[03:28] <LaserJock> nixternal: ping
[03:40] <nixternal> LaserJock: pong?
[03:40] <LaserJock> nixternal: I submitted my first fridge item
[03:40] <LaserJock> care to take a look?
[03:40] <nixternal> will do right now
[03:42] <nixternal> submitted
[03:44] <LaserJock> thank you sir
[09:36] <LaserJock> ok, so MOTU are having an open Q&A time and a Universe HUG day in the next week
[09:37] <LaserJock> do those sound fridge worthy?
[09:48] <mdke> you could tweak dholbach's text for the q&a announcement
[09:58] <LaserJock> I was going to sort of push both into one "In MOTU this week" kind of thing
[09:58] <LaserJock> in general Fridge seems to have a lot of "after the fact" news
[09:58] <mdke> LaserJock: sounds like a good plan
[09:58] <LaserJock> is it bad for me to do more "announcing X"
[09:59] <LaserJock> sort of marketing events rather than reporting on them after the fact
[10:00] <mdke> no, of course not; that sounds great
[10:01] <LaserJock> ok, I just don't want to break Fridge mojo
[10:01] <LaserJock> but I got like 3 times as many hits on my Behind MOTU blog since putting it on Fridge
[10:01] <LaserJock> than even putting it on Planet
[10:02] <mdke> that's pretty cool
[10:02] <mdke> we need to do more docteam publicity there :)
[10:03] <LaserJock> mhm
[10:31] <LaserJock> hmm, did something happen in fridge last night?
[10:31] <Burgundavia> why doy ou ask?
[10:32] <LaserJock> well, when I log in things are different
[10:32] <LaserJock> I don't see the submission queue anymore
[10:32] <LaserJock> and the administer section is greatly reduced
[10:33] <Burgundavia> likely somebody took some privs away from you
[10:33] <Burgundavia> let me poke
[10:34] <LaserJock> looks like it
[10:34] <LaserJock> which is fine, if that's what's needed
[10:34] <LaserJock> but it is nice to see the submission queue
[10:35] <Burgundavia> hmm, I don't see why
[10:35] <mdke> he's not an "administrator"
[10:36] <mdke> along with beuno and Madpilot
[10:36] <mdke> and popey
[10:36] <mdke> god knows how that distinction was arrived at
[10:37] <Burgundavia> I looked at access control, but I cannot figure out which of the obscurely named check boxes he woudl need
[10:37] <LaserJock> ok, so I was an administrator and now I'm not, correct?
[10:37] <Burgundavia> maybe
[10:37] <mdke> it's at http://fridge.ubuntu.com/admin/user
[10:38] <mdke> I'll make everyone an administrator until we actually have proper processes which make the distinction
[10:38] <mdke> make sense?
[10:39] <LaserJock> well, I can kinda see if you had like 50 "reporters" you'd maybe want to make a distinction
[10:39] <mdke> I think ultimately we should look to have a group of people contributing stories, and a group of editors. It will be easier to do when it's possible for anyone to post stories
[10:40] <LaserJock> exactly
[10:40] <Burgundavia> that works
[10:41] <mdke> Burgundavia: have you reviewed my changes to the planet spec?
[10:42] <Burgundavia> yep, looked at them
[10:42] <mdke> all ok?
[10:42] <Burgundavia> they look good except for one thing: clearly illegal content includes canonical employees spilling, non-canonical emplolyees spilling and other stuff
[10:43] <mdke> sorry, I don't follow
[10:44] <Burgundavia> there are two cases of concern here: illegal stuff and annoying stuff
[10:44] <Burgundavia> the latter is like the \sh issue
[10:44] <Burgundavia> the former is like the dell leak
[10:45] <mdke> yes, that's right
[10:45] <mdke> doesn't the spec say that?
[10:46] <Burgundavia> the rationale is a little bit more biased towards the "only canonical side"
[10:48] <mdke> you mean because the sentence about 1 is longer than the sentence about 2?
[10:48] <Burgundavia> no, the sentence about leaks only talks about canonical, in the rationale
[10:49] <Burgundavia> there is the very real possibility, as the commercial ecosystem grows, that it could be a system76 employee, for example
[10:49] <mdke> "or subsequently a community member"
[10:49] <mdke> ah, I'm with you now
[10:49] <Burgundavia> just changed it
[10:50] <mdke> I'm not sure it's necessary, given that planet is only open to members, I think "community members" covers it, myself
[10:50] <mdke> still, I know what you mean, at last :)
[10:51] <Burgundavia> I work for Userful. What if I break embargo and blog about something?
[10:51] <Burgundavia> how does Userful get my post off Planet Ubuntu?
[10:52] <mdke> yes, I understood
[10:53] <Burgundavia> ok, cool :)
[11:01] <LaserJock> ok, I got a story in the queue, if somebody could check it
[11:06] <Burgundavia> post meeting, yep
[11:33] <LaserJock> Burgundavia, mdke: do you guys know if \sh's post was ever removed
[11:33] <LaserJock> I believe he took it off himself, but I don't know for sure
[11:33] <mdke> yeah, corey removed his blog; \sh requested it
[11:34] <Burgundavia> I removed his blog from planet, as he requested
[11:34] <LaserJock> ok, but there wasn't any "we're removing your blog" thing
[11:34] <LaserJock> no "censorship"
[11:34] <LaserJock> I think that might be something that needs to be cleared up in this case
[11:34] <LaserJock> I get the impression that some people think Canonical took his blog away from him  or something
[11:35] <Burgundavia> no
[11:37] <LaserJock> bah, big deal over not much of anything
[11:38] <mdke> Burgundavia: did you email him about removing it from planet?
[11:38] <Burgundavia> yes, if I got his email right
[11:39] <Burgundavia> let me reemail him, because it went to his @ubuntu.com addy
[11:39] <Burgundavia> which may no longer be redirecting
[11:40] <mdke> thanks