/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2007/05/29/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

=== cjwatson_ [n=cjwatson@82-69-40-219.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== tonyyarusso [n=anthony@ubuntu/member/tonyyarusso] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== Admiral_Chicago_ [n=freddy@adsl-68-255-99-153.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
Admiral_Chicagognomefreak: still around?06:08
=== tonyyarusso [n=anthony@ubuntu/member/tonyyarusso] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== tonyyarusso [n=anthony@ubuntu/member/tonyyarusso] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== asac [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
asachi!09:56
asacdoes the link in bug 88317 crash for anyone?10:50
ubotuLaunchpad bug 88317 in firefox "firefox crash [@nsJSEnvironment::Init]  [@LocaleToUnicode]  [@nsViewManager::ForceUpdate]  ..." [High,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/8831710:50
hjmfhi asac. It doesn't crash for me ^^11:25
hjmfsame locale than the OP11:26
gnomefreakasac: how was your trip?11:28
asacyeah grewat11:30
asacunfortunately, the weather was bad :) ... so we couldn't go to the beach11:30
asacbut was nice anyway11:30
asachjmf: thanks11:30
asaci will reject it then :)11:30
gnomefreakasac: im testing in feisty atm to see if it crashes for me11:31
asacold reports without dupe should be closed :)11:31
gnomefreakim installing feistys version of ffox11:31
asacgnomefreak: cool11:31
gnomefreakasac: does -trunk us the new nss nspr packages?11:32
gnomefreaks/us/use11:32
asacgnomefreak: yes11:32
gnomefreakhmmmmmmm11:32
asaci made it work11:32
asacwith system-nss et all11:32
asacal11:32
gnomefreakasac: might want to take a look at it11:32
asacwhy?11:32
asacwhats the problem?11:33
asacat least on friday it build well :)11:33
gnomefreakasac: someone complained when installing it there was a problem overwriting one fo the old things that are in mspr11:33
gnomefreakbut not sure if he screwed up or not he left before i could ask11:33
asacwhich versino?11:33
asacthe old one didn't use that11:33
gnomefreakthe latest11:33
gnomefreaki think11:33
asacgnomefreak: then don't bother ... can you install firefox-trunk?11:34
gnomefreakdarkmage was the one having problems11:34
asachave you uploaded i386 build already?11:34
gnomefreaki havent tried yet ive been on other things. yes all is uploaded11:34
asacdon't know darkmage11:34
asac:)11:34
asack11:34
asacgnomefreak: did you use my orig.tar.gz for -trunk?11:34
gnomefreakyep11:34
gnomefreakhe was building it with other options so he might have scred up11:35
gnomefreakscrewed*11:35
gnomefreaki cant remeber what .so package it was but it was one that we had to remove from firefox2.0 in firefox-install file11:36
gnomefreaknot crashing in feisty here either11:37
asache build on his own?11:38
gnomefreaki couldnt find the ac_options in firefox-trunk.install or -install or whatever it is named11:38
asacok ... thats not supported :)11:38
gnomefreakasac: yes11:38
gnomefreak:)11:38
gnomefreakduring install it failed to overwrite something11:38
asacthere are no ac_options in firefox-trunk.install ... in that file there are just the files that will be installed11:38
asacfor him or for yxou?11:38
gnomefreakyeah i notinced11:38
gnomefreakhim11:38
asacgnomefreak: i think he messed up11:39
asac... at least if it built for you as well11:39
gnomefreakim leaning that way too11:39
gnomefreakit built fine here11:39
gnomefreakoh btw i think i found the file in iceape for the prefferences example pref("browser....) but it doesnt list the one i need am i supposed to add it to the all.js file :(11:40
gnomefreaktrying to make use of the go button in the tool bar11:41
gnomefreakubuntu-1.1.x/modules/libpref/src/init/all.js is the path and file i was looking in11:42
asacyeah right11:46
asacyou have to use dpatch-edit-patch <newpatchname> ... then edit that file11:46
asacand use ctrl-d to exit dpatch shell ... which will create the patch for you11:46
asacgnomefreak: ^^^11:46
gnomefreakok should i be cd'ed into top level or into /init/11:47
gnomefreaki am thinking like everyother patch be outside the source dir11:47
asache?11:47
asacfor dpatch-edit-patch you have to be in top-level i guess11:48
asacno ... dpatch-edit-patch will do the magic for you11:48
asacyou just have to use it ... then edit ... then exit that shell11:48
gnomefreakok ill try it i have no fear11:49
gnomefreaknumber of patch matter?11:49
asacyes ... look at the readme inside the patches dir11:49
asacthat explains what numbers to use11:50
gnomefreakk11:52
gnomefreakbrb brewing more coffee11:52
asack11:52
asaci am already in my 2nd litre as well:)11:52
asachjmf: what time do you think should bugs sit in mt-confirm before we reject them if they neither a dupe nor a testcase?11:54
asachjmf: .... and can we automize this :)11:55
hjmfasac: a couple of months? let me do it ;)11:58
asachjmf: hmm ok ... lets say 2+ month till it was reported ... and no testcase12:02
asachjmf: how can we figure out that there is not testcase ?12:02
asachjmf: do we need a tag?12:02
gnomefreakasac: there is no readme anywhere that has anything to do with patches :(12:03
gnomefreakthere is however a 82_prefs.dpatch patch already12:05
gnomefreakand it is same file i am patching12:05
hjmfthere should be a  mt-needtestcase12:05
asacgnomefreak: ok12:05
hjmfthat's the only way12:06
asacgnomefreak: use that patch12:06
asace.g. use dpatch-edit-patch 82_prefs12:06
asacoh12:06
asacgnomefreak: don't use that12:06
gnomefreakk12:06
asacuse: dpatch-edit-patch 82_prefs_ubuntu12:06
asacgnomefreak: ok?12:06
gnomefreakk12:06
asacfine12:06
gnomefreakand add .dpatch to the name or will it do it for me12:06
asachjmf: so we add to all that don't have a testcase ... mt-needtestcase?12:07
asachjmf: maybe we should use the 'testcase' tag to tag bugs that have one?12:07
hjmfreject bugs with tag mt-confirm + mt-needtestcase + older 2m + No dups12:07
hjmfyes maybe mt-hastestcase in needsinfo state?12:07
asachjmf: ok12:08
gnomefreakonce we have testcase we need testers12:08
asachjmf: mt-hastestcase is fine with me12:08
hjmfok12:08
asachjmf: can even be valid in confirm imo12:08
asaci mean to use that tag12:08
asac:)12:08
asachjmf: actually i would like to do that only with crashes12:09
asachjmf: can we do that?12:09
asachjmf: i have fear to close valid "normal" behavioural bug reports that we just triaged badly12:09
hjmfwe can issue a crontask for that if we are confident with the testcase tag12:09
asachjmf: maybe we shjould really use mt-needstestcase12:09
asacto prevent such things from happening12:09
asacmight be a bit more work (e.g. tag every crash mt-needtestcase12:10
hjmfnot more work, that is pretty automatic12:10
asachjmf: yes ... for new retraces :)12:10
hjmfyes12:10
asachjmf: but how does auto-retracer detect that there is no testcase atm?12:11
hjmfno way, that has to do by hand :)12:11
hjmfunless it is able to read and understand the bug summary :-P12:11
asachjmf: ok ... so maybe we shouldn't tag mt-needtestcase manually12:12
asacbut instead make those bugs appear in bughelper or by some smart query12:12
asacso we can regularly review crashes for "maybe attached testcases" ?12:12
asac"hjmf: ok ... so maybe we shouldn't tag mt-needtestcase manually" -> automatically of course12:12
hjmfif we attach them first it is ok12:12
asachjmf: then?12:13
hjmfI vote for a "has test case" tag12:13
asachjmf: yeah12:13
hjmfor better as you say a "has test case" attachment12:13
gnomefreakhmmm thats awfully verbose :(12:13
hjmfthat can't be deleted by error12:13
hjmfeg if some one deletes the 'has test case' tag a right bug might be rejected12:14
gnomefreakbut what would mt-hastestcase do?12:14
gnomefreakif we push the tag to mt-needtester it moves the bug along12:15
asachjmf: maybe we should not close automatically ... but tag something like "reject-candidate"12:15
hjmfbut a 'empty file' named "has test case" attached can do the trick12:15
asacso we can manually process that list?12:15
asachjmf: hmmm ... but we cannot remove them :)12:15
asace.g. if the testcase is bad ... or someone made an error the bug will always have a testcase12:16
hjmfright12:16
hjmfasac: you are right, maybe "reject-candidate" it is safer for such automatic use12:16
hjmfhowever we still need a confident way to look for a test case :)12:17
asacok ... lets think a bit more about this ... but using mt-reject-candidate appears to be ok12:17
hjmfto me too. Let's think a bit. I'll make a draft and tell you in the next days12:18
asaca draft in the wiki?12:18
hjmfthe other parts are easy: date, mt-confirm tag, no dups12:18
hjmfasac: script12:18
asacah12:18
asacok12:18
asacyes go ahead :)12:18
hjmfk12:19
asacits not that "dangerous" to just do it12:19
asacbecause its just a tag :)12:19
hjmfindeed at first it might only return a list  of candidates (even safer) :)12:19
hjmfand less messy12:19
asachehe ... right :)12:20
asacthough i would not mind if somehow 200 bugs just disappear :)12:20
hjmfright :)12:20
asacanyway ... mt-confirm list in needs info is now below 100 again :)12:20
hjmfI've seen your early spam :)12:21
asacmaybe i rejected too aggressively ... but i don't think so ... we just cannot push that amount of crashes without dupe upstream12:21
hjmfright ... and I can still search for dups while retracing looking for already rejected ones12:22
hjmfso it is not a problem at all12:22
hjmfto resque some one form rejected limbo12:22
asachjmf: really? ... cool12:22
asachow can we bring those to attention? ... e.g. resurrection candidates12:22
asac?12:22
hjmfdon't worry for that, as I retrace bugs I open firefox to search for the new crash signature12:23
hjmfit is the in the same script I use to post the new retraces12:24
hjmfit is tricky, but does the trick for me12:24
hjmfOK! tonight when I'll be back at home I'll start with that mt-confirm script and meanwhile I'll think how to solve the 'has test case' stuff12:26
gnomefreakasac: i think i did it :) patch is in debian/patches  it didnt put it in 00list  im assuming i need to do that right?12:26
asachjmf: thanks so much!12:27
hjmfasac: yw12:27
asacgnomefreak: did you exit the dpatch shell?12:27
asacgnomefreak: is there content in the new patch-file?12:27
gnomefreakyep it created it in patches12:27
asacok ... then add it to the end of the list :)12:27
gnomefreaksweet. do you need me to post this patch before i add it in gutsys iceape. right now it is being added to mt build to test it12:28
asacgnomefreak: we have two bzr branches right?12:29
gnomefreaki think so12:29
asacgnomefreak: one is your private one the other ~mozillateam?12:29
gnomefreakyes12:29
asacjust push it to yours12:29
asaci take a look and then you can merge it to ~mozillateam12:29
gnomefreakjust push the full patches dir?12:29
asacare the branches in synch otherwise?12:29
asacgnomefreak: no ... you have to bzr add debian/patches/newpatchfilename.dpath12:30
=== gnomefreak not sure if they are synced or not
asacthen commit debian/patches/00list and that file12:30
gnomefreakk12:30
asacgnomefreak: just compare revisions12:30
asacyou can look in launchpad12:30
asacif both have the same revno ... then probably they are in synch12:30
gnomefreakok finished all my changes. now i have to bzr adddebian/patches/newpatchfilename.dpath?12:37
gnomefreaks/adddebian/add debian12:37
asacyes12:39
gnomefreak.dpath should be .dpatch?12:39
asacthe you commit the new patch file and the modified list ... with a decent commet12:39
asacyes12:39
gnomefreakk12:39
asaccomment12:39
asac;)12:39
gnomefreaki think its doing it ill let you know when done12:48
asacgnomefreak: cool12:49
gnomefreakasac: btw the problem with trunk we were talking about was it failed to overwrite /path/to/libnssckbi.so12:49
gnomefreakits not showing changes on LP yet12:50
gnomefreakLaunchpad could not mirror this branch 1 minutes ago.  The error was: Knit ...12:50
gnomefreakis the error on the page12:50
gnomefreakhttps://code.beta.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/iceape/ubuntu-1.1.x12:51
gnomefreaki will ping LP guys after i get back from smoke12:51
asacthe page shows changes12:52
asacthough there is an error message as well12:52
asac#12:52
asacBy John Vivirito <email address hidden> on 2007-04-2412:52
asac* debian/rules: don't try to sign libnss because its not build by iceape anymore12:52
asacgnomefreak: you have not yet synched rev 7712:52
asacfrom ~mozillateam branch12:53
asacprobably you have to do that12:53
asaclet me know if you have up to date ~gnomefreak branch ... i can do the synch to ~mozillateam12:53
asace.g. four eyes :)12:53
gnomefreakhow do i do that?12:57
gnomefreakwhere did you see that?12:57
gnomefreakbzr log doesnt show me that01:00
gnomefreakbzr log nor bzr diff doesnt show that for me :(01:04
gnomefreakshould it be bzr status <mozillateam branch link>?01:07
asacWHAT DO YOU AwNT TO SEE?01:10
asacgnomefreak: what do you want to see?01:10
asacgnomefreak: you see that on ~mozillateam branch01:10
asacit has rev 7701:10
asacyours has 7601:10
gnomefreakthe part that wasnt merged01:10
asacyou can do a diff to the ~mozillateam brancgh01:11
asacor just look at the log01:11
asac... or just try to merge01:11
gnomefreakmine is showing revno: 8001:11
gnomefreakcommitter: John Vivirito <gnomefreak@Gutsy>01:11
gnomefreakbranch nick: ubuntu-1.1.x01:11
gnomefreaktimestamp: Tue 2007-05-29 06:46:26 -040001:11
gnomefreakmessage: * Updated accordingly.01:11
asacah01:11
asacyeah ... then lp was not update01:11
asactry to merge from mozillateam01:11
gnomefreakhow?01:11
asaclike always01:11
gnomefreakbzr merge01:12
asacyes01:12
gnomefreakok let me try01:12
asacbzr merge urltootherbranch01:12
gnomefreakthan look to see what needs to be pushed?01:13
asacno ... just after you merged ... and you committed your changes01:13
asacjust push up to your branch01:13
asaci will merge it into mozillteam branch01:13
gnomefreaknothing to do was what i got01:13
asacfine01:13
asacthen you can push your changes up to your branch01:13
asaci will merge to mozillateam01:13
gnomefreakbzr merge http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/iceape/ubuntu-1.1.x01:13
gnomefreakhttp://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/iceape/ubuntu-1.1.x is permanently redirected to http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/iceape/ubuntu-1.1.x/01:13
gnomefreakNothing to do.01:14
asacyes01:14
asaclooks good01:14
asacwhat are the upstream urls you see in bzr info?01:14
gnomefreakok cool but you cant merge from mine while that error is there can you?01:14
asaci can01:14
asacits just the web-interface that is broken01:14
gnomefreakah01:14
asacthat doesn't matter much01:14
gnomefreakrunning bzr info waiting for it to do something01:15
gnomefreakyou want location URl or publish URl?01:15
gnomefreakor related01:15
gnomefreakgnomefreak@Gutsy:~/feisty_builds/iceape/ubuntu-1.1.x$ bzr info01:16
gnomefreakLocation:01:16
gnomefreak  branch root: file:///home/gnomefreak/feisty_builds/iceape/ubuntu-1.1.x/01:16
gnomefreakRelated branches:01:16
gnomefreak      parent branch: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/iceape/ubuntu-1.1.x/01:16
gnomefreak  publish to branch: sftp://gnomefreak@bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Egnomefreak/iceape/ubuntu-1.1.x/01:16
gnomefreakthats what i got with other stuff under it but those are the only links i see01:16
asacyes looks good01:19
asacjust push it01:19
asacjust bzr push01:19
asacparent branch is where you merge from ... publish branch is where you push to01:19
gnomefreakok im pushing01:19
gnomefreakNo new revisions to push.01:21
asacgnomefreak: maybe you haven't committed your local changes?01:23
asacwhat does the last 2 log entries read?01:23
asachow do they read i mean :)01:23
gnomefreaki did from waht bzr log shows01:23
gnomefreak<flood>01:24
gnomefreakrevno: 8001:24
gnomefreakcommitter: John Vivirito <gnomefreak@Gutsy>01:24
gnomefreakbranch nick: ubuntu-1.1.x01:24
gnomefreaktimestamp: Tue 2007-05-29 06:46:26 -040001:24
gnomefreakmessage:01:24
gnomefreak    * Updated accordingly.01:24
gnomefreak------------------------------------------------------------01:24
gnomefreakrevno: 7901:24
gnomefreakcommitter: John Vivirito <gnomefreak@Gutsy>01:24
gnomefreakbranch nick: ubuntu-1.1.x01:24
gnomefreaktimestamp: Tue 2007-05-29 06:43:45 -040001:24
gnomefreakmessage:01:24
gnomefreak    * debian/patches/82_prefs_ubuntu.dpatch: debian/patches/82_prefs_ubuntu.dpa01:24
gnomefreaktch: Make use of the go button in01:24
gnomefreak      tool bar01:24
gnomefreak------------------------------------------------------------01:24
gnomefreakrevno: 7801:24
gnomefreakcommitter: John Vivirito <gnomefreak@Gutsy>01:24
gnomefreakbranch nick: ubuntu-1.1.x01:24
asacwhat did you commit in revno 80 ?01:24
gnomefreaktimestamp: Tue 2007-05-29 06:41:51 -040001:24
gnomefreakmessage:01:24
gnomefreak    * Updated accordingly.01:24
gnomefreaklast ones i commited today01:25
asaccan you please name next time "what" you updated accordingly? changelog?01:25
gnomefreakit was either changelog or 00list01:25
asacyeah ... you should name it next time :)01:25
asacso its already pushed01:25
asacfine01:25
gnomefreak80 was changelog01:25
asacyeah01:26
asacnext time just name debian/changelog: updated accordingly01:26
gnomefreakah ok01:26
asacor just "updated changelog accordingly"01:26
asacor even better "updated changelog for modifications: revno: 79,78 ... blablabla01:26
gnomefreak78 is the 00list01:27
gnomefreakah i see01:27
asacyeah ... that is even more important :)01:27
asacanyway ... ok now01:27
gnomefreakso bzr is ok?01:27
asacgnomefreak: its not yet pushed01:27
asaci get nothing to to01:28
asacplease push again01:28
gnomefreakthats a bzr/LP issue than no?01:28
asacno idea01:28
asacgnomefreak: can you ask?01:28
asacyou sure that you cannot push to your branch?01:28
gnomefreakyeah ill see if i get answered01:28
asacmaybe specify your branch url specifically01:28
asacin bzr push01:28
gnomefreaki pushed it already01:28
asace.g. bzr push sftp://....01:28
gnomefreakill push again01:29
asacif i branch from your branch i just get rev 7401:29
gnomefreakill go for smoke and let you know what it says when i return unless its done now01:30
asacso some commits are missing01:30
asacok01:30
gnomefreakgnomefreak@Gutsy:~/feisty_builds/iceape/ubuntu-1.1.x$ bzr push sftp://gnomefreak@bazaar.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/iceape/ubuntu-1.1.x01:30
gnomefreakNo new revisions to push.01:30
asacand bzr info?01:30
asacgives you revno 80 ?01:30
asachmm01:30
asacgnomefreak: please try to branch that to /tmp/ or something01:31
asacto see if you get the latest through sftp01:31
gnomefreakIn the working tree:01:31
gnomefreak       133 unchanged01:31
gnomefreak         0 modified01:31
gnomefreak         0 added01:31
gnomefreak         0 removed01:31
asacwhich i cannot use because i cannot access your dir then01:31
gnomefreak         0 renamed01:31
gnomefreak        65 unknown01:31
asacgnomefreak: just what revision01:31
gnomefreak         2 ignored01:31
asacthe rest is not important :)01:31
asacor paste to pastebin :)01:31
gnomefreaklatest revision: Tue 2007-05-29 06:46:26 -040001:31
asacgnomefreak: please cd /tmp/01:31
asacsftp://gnomefreak@bazaar.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/iceape/ubuntu-1.1.x01:32
asac# bzr branch sftp://gnomefreak@bazaar.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/iceape/ubuntu-1.1.x01:32
asaci mean01:32
gnomefreakbzr clone?01:32
asacgnomefreak: not the date ... the revision number01:32
asacbzr clone === bzr branch === bzr checkout01:32
asacchoose whatever you like most01:32
gnomefreakso you want me to create another one to see if changes are therE?01:32
asacyes01:33
asacjust in /tmp/01:33
asacnothing permanent01:33
asacif i branch your branch i just get 74 revisions01:33
asaclest see if you get 80 revisions01:33
asacif you branch through sftp01:33
asace.g. do a fresh branch01:33
gnomefreakim trying01:33
asack01:33
gnomefreakit will be a bit01:33
asack01:34
gnomefreaklol01:41
gnomefreaka fucking traceback :(01:41
asacwhen branching?01:41
asactry again01:42
=== gnomefreak joining #bzr
asacwhat did you run?01:42
asaccommand above?01:42
asacwhen you are in /tmp/ ?01:42
gnomefreakgnomefreak@Gutsy:~/temp$ bzr clone sftp://gnomefreak@bazaar.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/iceape/ubuntu-1.1.x01:42
gnomefreakbzr: ERROR: bzrlib.errors.KnitCorrupt: Knit 7c/svn-v2%253a39742%40f4e3d8d1-d80b-0410-9133-bbc0d6b0e2e8-iceape%25252ftrunk-debian%25252fpatches%25252f38_kbsd.dpatch.knit corrupt: While reading {asac@jwsdot.com-20070424114836-6fr7vgqel4eh6qbl} got AssertionError(what does flush do?)01:42
asache?01:42
asacare you in /tmp/ ?01:42
gnomefreakyes look at first line i gave :)01:43
asacis that dir clear?01:43
gnomefreaki made a temp dir01:43
asacor is there ubunt-1.1.x already in it?01:43
asacbe sure that its not already there01:43
gnomefreakubuntu- is there01:43
gnomefreaknow it is01:43
asacremove it ... and try again :)01:43
asacthat error looks ... kind of wierd01:44
gnomefreakit wasnt before since i had just made the dir01:44
asachmm01:44
asacmaybe try again?01:44
gnomefreakk01:44
asacif it happens again ... then #bzr people might be the right way to go01:44
asaci will never go to that channel again though :)01:44
gnomefreakthats odd01:45
asacworks now?01:45
gnomefreaknot sure its not done01:46
asack01:46
gnomefreakslow connection remember ;)01:46
asacyeah :)01:46
gnomefreakdealing with freenode issues now too01:47
asacfreenode? splitting away?01:47
gnomefreakim not +u anymore and i need to be01:47
asac+u ?01:47
asaci have +ei01:47
gnomefreakjoin more than 20 channels01:47
asacwhich is just identified01:47
asacno :)01:47
asaci am in 15 or so01:48
asacthats enough :)01:48
gnomefreak+u allows you to do that01:48
asacah01:48
asachmm ... never had a problem01:48
asac+i should as well01:48
gnomefreakfreenode restricts you to 20 channels01:48
asacas you are identified01:48
asacreally?01:48
asachmm01:48
gnomefreakyes01:48
asaci don't like freenode01:48
asacactually debian-devel moved to oftc at some point01:48
gnomefreakyou have to apply/ask for a +u to get in more01:48
asacbecause of the freenode wierdness01:48
gnomefreakyep i blame them too ;)01:49
asacwhy do they restrict to 20 channels? load issues?01:50
asacor anti-troll measures?01:50
asacmakes no sense imo01:50
gnomefreaknot sure01:51
gnomefreakstill same traceback01:52
gnomefreakonce i get this figured out ill join #bzr but as it stands i cant join there01:52
gnomefreakok i asked im not really sure ill get an answer they tend to hate to help people in there01:56
=== gnomefreak goes for coffee and smoke while i wait, last time i try this i waited an hour or 2 and left finally cause they didnt answer
gnomefreakwell they remember the error. he stated: there's at least a chance its some kind of bzr-svn  bug02:05
gnomefreaka chance doesnt make me feel any better02:05
asactse02:08
asacwhat a bad answer02:08
asacas we did not synch bzr with svn02:08
asacrecently02:09
asacand it worked02:09
gnomefreakhmmmmmmm02:11
gnomefreaki think bug in gutsy caused this im gonna try something02:12
gnomefreakwell i found out why i got error during last push but not helpfull to anything atm02:15
=== gnomefreak not happy at all now
gnomefreaksomeone changed the UI on my pastebin :) it looks ummmm pretty?02:17
gnomefreakin a weird sence02:17
gnomefreaksense02:17
gnomefreakasac: can you check if they are in commit and not pushed? if so can you try to push?02:19
asacmaybe gutsy bzr is broken02:19
asacuse feisty version then02:19
gnomefreakim thinking about it02:19
asacgnomefreak: i can't get them02:19
asacactually i think you merged your local iceape from svn right?02:19
gnomefreakok didnt think so thought i would ask :)02:19
asace.g. updated from debian branch?02:19
gnomefreaki dont remember02:19
asacdid you do that?02:19
gnomefreakyes in the begining02:20
asacdo you see any changelog entries from mike hommey?02:20
asace.g. within the last 8 commits or something02:20
gnomefreakthat was odd02:21
asacgnomefreak: did you ever merge from svn to your (ubunt-1.1.x) branch?02:22
gnomefreakif you bzr log there are entries from someone i dont know so im checking changelog in package but no mike in bzr log02:22
asacthat is wrong02:22
asacwe have a debian-1.1.x branch for that02:22
asacthe we merge ubuntu-1.1.x from debian-1.1.x ... and not directly from svn02:22
gnomefreakasac: i dont remember i know i used svn to grab debian stuff but cant remember (im gonna say i doubt it02:22
asacgnomefreak: what name/email has the one you don't know?02:22
asacgnomefreak: i bet you did02:23
asacgnomefreak: probably you have to start over and apply your patches one by one02:23
gnomefreakrevno: 6002:23
gnomefreakcommitter: glandium02:23
gnomefreaktimestamp: Sat 2007-04-21 12:17:00 +000002:23
gnomefreakmessage:02:23
gnomefreak  * debian/control, debian/rules: Removed dummy packages for transition from02:23
gnomefreak    mozilla.02:23
asacyes thats mike02:23
gnomefreak  * debian/*mozilla*: Removed.02:23
asacyou merged from svn02:23
asacwhich is wrong02:23
gnomefreakah damn02:23
asacyou should have merged to debian-1.1.x02:23
asacthe merge from debian-1.1.x to ubuntu-1.1.x02:23
asac:)02:23
asacits not a big problem02:23
gnomefreaki didnt see a debian one02:23
asacyou should be able to apply your patches one by one02:24
asacisn't there?02:24
gnomefreaki never saw one02:24
asachttps://code.launchpad.net/iceape/02:24
gnomefreakif there is its a secret02:24
asacno02:24
asacthere never was a secret02:24
gnomefreakthere is i dont have that under codes in LP02:25
asacgnomefreak: beacuse its a mozillateam branch?02:25
gnomefreakno i have mt branches in mine02:25
asacgnomefreak: ok i do that for you know02:25
gnomefreakhttps://code.beta.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/02:25
asacgnomefreak: you probably subscribed manually?02:26
gnomefreaki can upload to it02:26
asacor once you committed to them they pop up02:26
gnomefreakno i havent yet02:26
gnomefreaki was just about to do that02:26
asacok debian-1.1.x is up to date02:26
gnomefreakwhy is this an issue now and not before02:26
asaci now pull things over to mozillateam ubuntu-1.1.x branch02:26
asacfrom where you should ideally branch your private branch02:27
asacits not an issue ... *you* claim that its an issue02:27
gnomefreakso when your done i merge?02:27
asace.g. that its a secret because the branch is not in your code list02:27
asacgnomefreak: i doubt it02:27
gnomefreakasac: the errors im getting are they related to this?02:27
asaci think you have to branch again ... and then merge your checkins over it02:27
asacgnomefreak: the error is related because you pulled in changes from svn02:28
asacgnomefreak: which is not the right parent branch02:28
asacgnomefreak: for you02:28
gnomefreakah02:28
gnomefreakwhen your done what am i gonna do? recreate a branch?02:29
asacok gnomefreak ... just branch the ~mozillateam ubuntu-1.1.x branch again (keep yuor current branch somewhere)02:29
gnomefreakok so clone the mozillateam one?02:29
asacthe you merge in your checkins from the old branch02:29
asacgnomefreak: yes02:29
asacgnomefreak: 1st clone mozilla team ubuntu-1.1.x02:29
gnomefreakok ill start there02:29
asacgnomefreak: 2nd merge revisions from your old branch02:29
asace.g. bzr merge -r77..78 /path/to/old/broken/branch02:30
asacwhere 77 is the commit you want on your fresh checkout02:30
asaclook with bzr log in your broken branch which checkins you want02:30
asacand which are obsolete02:31
asacgnomefreak: ok?02:31
gnomefreakso just merge 77 78 and 79?02:31
asaci have no idea ... its your decision to decide what revisions you need02:31
asacbut use 77..78  if you want to merge just revision7702:32
asacif you want to merge revision 7802:32
asacuse 78..7902:32
asacyou get it?02:32
gnomefreaki think os02:32
gnomefreakso02:32
asacgnomefreak: maybe you have luck and cen improve the checkin commments02:32
asacby this chance :)02:32
asace.g. add info based on what you changed "accordingly" :)02:33
gnomefreakok so im merging from my branch to mozillateam branch the changes i made today02:37
gnomefreakwhat do i do after i merge to mozillateam branch is there a way to merge mozillateam branch to fix mine?02:39
asacgnomefreak: no02:40
asacyou branch your private branch from mozillateam02:40
asacapply your changes02:40
asacthen push to your private branch02:40
asacyou can use --override option or somthing to override your broken archive02:41
asaclook bzr help merge02:41
asacaeh02:41
asacbzr help push02:41
asacto see the options02:41
gnomefreaklol bzr merge --help doesnt show an --override option but i know there is one02:53
gnomefreakbzr merge --overwrite  /path/to/broken/branch? or would i use sftp: link for broken branch?02:55
gnomefreakoh bar push --overwrite sftp:link02:56
gnomefreakbzr even02:56
gnomefreaklets see if bzr push --overwrite sftp://gnomefreak@bazaar.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/iceape/ubuntu-1.1.x  works02:57
gnomefreakyay it pushed 80 revisions02:57
gnomefreaknow i pull or remove than clone over again?02:58
gnomefreakAll changes applied successfully.03:05
gnomefreakNow on revision 8003:05
gnomefreakthat mean pull took care of everything?03:05
gnomefreakbzr log still shows mike :(03:07
gnomefreakasac: something went wrong i still cant clone from my branch03:20
asacgnomefreak: you messed up :)03:33
gnomefreakwhat did i do wrong?03:33
asacdid you branch from mozillateam branch and applied your changes?03:33
asacapparently not03:33
asacor did you?03:33
asace.g. with merge -r 77..78 and so on?03:33
gnomefreaki did that03:33
gnomefreakmozillateam branch is good03:34
gnomefreakthey all applied and i wrote better discriptions03:34
asacgnomefreak: fine03:34
asacthen push the mozillateam branch up to your private branch03:34
asacdid you do that?03:34
gnomefreaki tried to03:34
asacwhat happened?03:34
gnomefreakbzr push --overwrite03:35
gnomefreaksftp://gnomefreak@bazaar.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/iceape/ubuntu-1.1.x03:35
gnomefreak08:57 <      gnomefreak > yay it pushed 80 revisions03:35
gnomefreakwait a sec03:35
gnomefreaktrying again with bzr push --overwrite sftp:link03:36
gnomefreakto my broken branch03:37
asacyou probably pushed to mozillateam03:37
gnomefreakpushing again03:37
gnomefreakgnomefreak@Gutsy:~/temp/ubuntu-1.1.x$ bzr push --overwrite sftp://gnomefreak@bazaar.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/iceape/ubuntu-1.1.x03:38
gnomefreakNo new revisions to push.03:38
asacyour local branch has not 80 revisions?03:38
asachas now03:38
gnomefreaknot that i see on LP03:38
asaci asked for *local* not LP03:39
gnomefreakbut bzr log always showed 80 after i commited my changes03:39
asacgnomefreak: your branch has problems ... launchpad fails to sync it03:39
gnomefreaki dont have a local of mine all i have is the mozilla one and it has 80 afaik03:40
asacyes the mozillateam branch is the *local*03:40
gnomefreakyes the mozilla one has 80 locally03:40
asacsince you push it to gnomefreak it should be03:40
asacok03:40
asacbut it isn't03:40
gnomefreakits not going there though03:40
asacso how many revisions has temp/ubuntu-1.1.x ?03:40
asac8003:40
asac?03:40
gnomefreakyes03:40
gnomefreakthat is mozillabranch03:41
asacgnomefreak: you can sftp into that sftp directory with some client03:41
asacmaybe delete your ubuntu-1.1.x branch by hand03:41
asacwith an sftp client03:42
asacdunno if nautilus works03:42
asacbut i think so03:42
gnomefreakyes bzr wants me to assign it to +junk03:42
asacassign  to junk?03:42
asacwhat does it display?03:42
asacwhen does bzr tell you that?03:42
gnomefreakthey just did03:42
gnomefreak09:40 <        mwhudson > but it's probably better for us if you reassign it03:43
gnomefreak                          to the +junk project03:43
gnomefreak09:41 <        mwhudson > which you should be able to do from03:43
gnomefreak          https://code.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/iceape/ubuntu-1.1.x/+edit03:43
asacgnomefreak: good ... then reassign it03:43
asacand when thats done push your branch again03:43
asacok?03:43
asacgnomefreak: how up to date is feisty tbird 2.0 on i386?03:45
asacis it the same as the amd64 build?03:45
gnomefreakyes03:45
gnomefreaklast week was last build03:45
gnomefreakwhen you uploaded source i grabbed it and built it03:46
asachmm03:46
asacok03:46
gnomefreaktheres is 10 pages of projects under search word junk :(03:46
asacgnomefreak: thats no problem03:47
asacits *trash*03:47
asacjust do it03:47
asacgnomefreak: why are menu icons missing for tbird ... are they missing in gutsy as well?03:48
asactbird 2.0 in preview archive i mean03:48
gnomefreakmenu icons?03:48
asac(feisty)03:48
asacyes03:48
asactbird menu icon03:48
gnomefreaki have it here in gutsy03:48
asacappears to be missing if you install your i386 package03:48
gnomefreakasac: i didnt change anything on it and havent had time to test it03:49
asacgnomefreak: so it i386 package is not the same version that is in gutsy03:49
asacgnomefreak: ok03:49
asacgnomefreak: when did i build tbird 2.0 for feisty archive?03:49
gnomefreakasac: i just used the sources you uploaded03:49
asacj03:49
asacif you ever boot into feisty, please test if they really miss03:49
asaci will test now on amd6403:50
gnomefreakyou uploaded the sources last week what day, did you build it for 64 i dont have a clue03:50
asacinstalling tbird 2.0 on my main system now to see it03:52
asacon amd64 its there03:52
asacplease test it asap03:52
gnomefreakas soon as i get this done03:53
asack ... don't need to just wonder why our builds diverged03:58
gnomefreakbooting laptop as we speak but its beeping at me04:00
gnomefreakok no more beeping04:01
gnomefreaklooks like branch is gone ;)04:01
asacgnomefreak: thats the idea, right?04:04
asacnow you can push your 80 revision branch04:04
asacand hopefully it works04:04
gnomefreaki hope so im pushing the mozillabranch since i commited and pushed the changes04:06
gnomefreaklaptop is very slow but ill be working on it to test tbird04:07
gnomefreakthat was odd04:13
=== ubuntu_laptop [n=ubuntu_l@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
ubuntu_laptopok lets see if i can do this04:17
asac:)04:17
ubuntu_laptop!moztest04:17
ubotuThe Mozilla-testing repos can be found at: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/PreviewArchives. Please remember these are testing repos, the packages in these repos are not stable and may break things on your system. Use with caution. Please report bugs found from these packages to: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/PreviewArchives/Bugs.04:17
ubuntu_laptopwhat is latest version number for tbird asac ?04:19
asacdunno04:19
asacdoesn't matter :)04:19
asaccompare what is in i386 to what is in amd64 repo04:19
asacubuntu_laptop: test with latest from preview feisty04:20
ubuntu_laptopi need it since its a lower version than whats in there show and policy are not showing it ill look it up04:21
ubuntu_laptopsomething is fucked up. i cant install it04:25
ubuntu_laptopok im installing a lower version but highest in archive than i will try to install the new package but i dont think it will happen04:26
gnomefreakok fixing tbird issue and i pushed wrong branch so redoing that04:35
asacgnomefreak: maybe use latest from bzr04:44
asacgnomefreak: or did the tbird issue resolve?04:44
gnomefreakim working on it04:45
gnomefreakits starting to piss me off bad04:45
asacyou already know what the issue is?04:46
ubuntu_laptopthunderbird-locale-en-gb is giving me issues04:46
ubuntu_laptopyes the problem is conflicts due to the versioning used on latest tbird04:48
ubuntu_laptopi dont know if im gonna beable to fix it but im working on it04:48
gnomefreakAlexLatchford: you here?04:49
AlexLatchfordyep04:49
gnomefreakAlexLatchford: what version of tbird are you using in feisty?04:49
AlexLatchford2.004:49
AlexLatchfordfrom your rep04:49
gnomefreakAlexLatchford: does it have menu icons?04:50
AlexLatchforderm yeah04:50
gnomefreakasac: ^^^04:50
AlexLatchfordAs in the drop menu or as in the big icons04:50
gnomefreakAlexLatchford: can you apt-cache policy thunderbird please04:50
gnomefreakthe accessories i believe04:50
AlexLatchfordthunderbird:04:51
AlexLatchford  Installed: 2.0.0.0-1ubuntu0.mt104:51
AlexLatchford  Candidate: 2.0.0.0-1ubuntu0.mt104:51
AlexLatchford  Version table:04:51
AlexLatchford *** 2.0.0.0-1ubuntu0.mt1 004:51
AlexLatchford        500 http://gnomefreak.youmortals.com feisty/main Packages04:51
AlexLatchford        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status04:51
gnomefreakther eis a newer version of it in repos but you would have to downgrade it04:51
AlexLatchforderm okay04:51
gnomefreakasac: does version matter?04:52
AlexLatchfordversion number?04:52
gnomefreakthunderbird_2.0.0.0-0ubuntu3~.mt1  but you might not have to04:52
gnomefreaklets wait and see what he says about the version04:53
AlexLatchfordcool cool04:53
AlexLatchfordgive me a buzz.. am messing about with AJAX, a real pain in the ass04:53
gnomefreakok ty04:53
=== gnomefreak been working on bzr for most of the time now maybe 3-4 hours :(
AlexLatchfordouch04:56
gnomefreakwell it pushed lets see if clone works :)04:57
gnomefreakasac: yes the newset version has icon in applications>internet menu04:59
asacgnomefreak: what do you mean by "newest version" ?05:01
asacdid you forget to remove the old one?05:01
asac(and it had higher version?)05:01
gnomefreakthunderbird_2.0.0.0-0ubuntu3~.mt105:01
gnomefreakthat is lower than other version we had. you said to use it anyway05:01
asacyes05:10
asacgnomefreak: you should have removed the old bins though05:10
asacwhich yuo didn't05:11
asacgnomefreak: please do so asap05:11
gnomefreakstill wont upgrade to it05:11
asacof course not05:11
asacyou have to remove it first05:11
asacif you ended up in the bad version05:11
gnomefreakill get there let me get what im doing done05:11
asack05:11
asaclet me know if you removed the .debs for bad vertsion05:11
asacand regen Packages05:11
gnomefreakthis wont build now05:12
asacwhat?05:12
gnomefreakiceape05:12
gnomefreakoh wait i know05:12
asac:)05:14
=== ubuntu_laptop [n=ubuntu_l@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
ubuntu_laptopHost 'Feisty-Laptop', running Linux 2.6.20-16-generic - Cpu0: Mobile Pentium II 299 MHz; Up: 2 min; Users: 2; Load: 2.69; Free: [Mem: 23/313 Mio]  [Swap: 918/918 Mio]  [/: 32431/36653 Mio] ; Vpenis: 23.4 cm;05:21
ubuntu_laptopyeah it worked05:22
asacwhat?05:22
ubuntu_laptopkernel upgrade05:22
asack05:22
asacyou can use uname -a as well :)05:22
gnomefreaklots of issues with -16 i heard05:22
asacno idea ... i never have issues :)05:22
gnomefreaktrue05:22
gnomefreakme neither05:22
asaci am not a hardware addict ... so i only have basic stuff that just works05:23
gnomefreakme too05:24
gnomefreakif patch fails to apply im going away for a while05:24
gnomefreak10_components was failing but i think i figured it out05:25
gnomefreakasac: you havent uploaded anything today right?05:36
asacy05:36
gnomefreakto our repo?05:36
gnomefreakso i know if i need to regen any of the other things other than release and 386 packages05:37
asacno ... i didn't upload05:39
asacif i do i tell you :)05:39
gnomefreakrepo is fixed than05:39
gnomefreak:)05:39
gnomefreakiceape is building an now im happy i can go eat lunch05:40
asacgnomefreak: good appetite06:08
asacgnomefreak: thanks for the repo fix06:08
=== JenFraggle [n=jen@91.84.43.217] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== DeVol [n=DeVol@dD5E04076.access.telenet.be] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
Admiral_Chicagohey the JenFraggle08:23
Admiral_Chicagoafternoon everone.08:54
=== JenFraggle [n=jen@91.84.43.217] has left #ubuntu-mozillateam ["Ex-Chat"]
Admiral_Chicagoasac: so you are closing crashes that aren't duplicates...09:12
Admiral_Chicagoor rather reproduceable09:12
asacif we haven't seen any dupes ... yes09:16
Admiral_Chicagookay good,09:16
asacfor some time09:16
asacwe are automizing this now :)09:16
asacwe will set something like mt-reject-candidate09:17
asacon bugs that have no testcase and no dupes09:17
asacand are older than 2 month or so09:17
Admiral_Chicagoyes, i'll try to do a bughelper query of bugs by duplicae09:17
asacwhat is the current state of bughelper info files?09:18
Admiral_ChicagoJen is working on them, we have added a few which is why i asked you what you were doing09:19
Admiral_Chicagoa few clues*09:19
Admiral_Chicagoi'm planning our workflow to be adding clues based on how many duplicates09:20
asacyes thats a good idea09:23
asaccan we sort by dupe count?09:23
asacor do we XML post processing?09:24
asacto setup task lists?09:24
gnomefreakwhy not just close them why another tag?09:24
Admiral_Chicagoi asked in -bugs. I'd like to list by highest number of duplicates in wiki or something.09:24
Admiral_ChicagoI'm not sure if we can sort them post-seach in bughelper...09:25
asacAdmiral_Chicago: if XML output channel includes dupe info we can post-process them using xslt09:28
Admiral_Chicagoasac: what is xslt?09:31
asaca language to flexibily transform xml to xml, html or whatever you want09:33
asacyou can use xpath et al09:33
asacjust google09:33
asacpretty decent xml processing technologie09:33
asacTHE standard to transform xml09:33
Admiral_Chicagoi think bughelper now uses xpath doesn't it?09:33
asacyes to select something09:33
Admiral_Chicagookay i may have to research that09:33
asacxslt allows you to match and out xml09:34
asacmatch and output that is09:34
asacxpath just allows to match09:34
Admiral_Chicagooh okay cool09:34
asacxpath is an auxiliary tech developed as kind of sub-standard of xslt09:34
asacits specified by w3c09:35
asacAdmiral_Chicago: http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt09:35
Admiral_Chicagoah from W3C..i see09:37
Admiral_Chicagobbiab09:37
gnomefreak@schedule09:41
gnomefreakdamnit09:41
ubotuSchedule for Etc/UTC: 29 May 21:00: Community Council | 30 May 12:00: Edubuntu | 30 May 20:00: Xubuntu Developers | 31 May 16:00: Ubuntu Development Team | 31 May 21:00: Kubuntu Developers | 05 Jun 19:00: Technical Board09:41
gnomefreak@schedule new_york09:41
ubotuSchedule for America/New_York: 29 May 17:00: Community Council | 30 May 08:00: Edubuntu | 30 May 16:00: Xubuntu Developers | 31 May 12:00: Ubuntu Development Team | 31 May 17:00: Kubuntu Developers | 05 Jun 15:00: Technical Board09:41
=== gnomefreak gone for a bit so i can be back before meeting
Admiral_Chicago@schedule chicago09:52
ubotuSchedule for America/Chicago: 29 May 16:00: Community Council | 30 May 07:00: Edubuntu | 30 May 15:00: Xubuntu Developers | 31 May 11:00: Ubuntu Development Team | 31 May 16:00: Kubuntu Developers | 05 Jun 14:00: Technical Board09:52
Admiral_Chicagoah i might need to go to a CC meeting...i haven't been to one in a while09:52
asac@schedule berlin10:02
ubotuSchedule for Europe/Berlin: 29 May 23:00: Community Council | 30 May 14:00: Edubuntu | 30 May 22:00: Xubuntu Developers | 31 May 18:00: Ubuntu Development Team | 31 May 23:00: Kubuntu Developers | 05 Jun 21:00: Technical Board10:02
asac1h left10:02
gnomefreakits gonna be a fairly long meeting10:46
gnomefreakwilling to bet 3+ hours10:46
Admiral_Chicagoi only like 2 or 3 people for membership10:48
Admiral_Chicagoimho, its gotten far too lax...10:48
gnomefreaktmt and bdmurry are about it IMHO but i havent studied the list10:49
Admiral_Chicagothere is also that woman...I can't remember her name so i have to use the title "woman"10:52
Admiral_Chicagobut she does a lot of work on the ubuntu-women project iirc10:52
gnomefreakpleia10:52
gnomefreaki didnt see her in the list10:52
Admiral_Chicagognomefreak: thats who i was referencin10:53
gnomefreakrepo should be back up i did a little more cleaning and uploaded new iceape10:58
=== Admiral_Chicago_ [n=freddy@adsl-68-255-99-153.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!