=== cjwatson_ [n=cjwatson@82-69-40-219.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk]  has joined #ubuntu-x
[12:46] <ubotu> New bug: #117461 in xfs (universe) "Please sync xfs 1:1.0.4-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/117461
=== seb128 [n=seb128@ubuntu/member/seb128]  has joined #ubuntu-x
=== seb128 [n=seb128@ubuntu/member/seb128]  has joined #ubuntu-x
[06:16] <ubotu> New bug: #117573 in xserver-xorg-video-i810 (main) "glFog implementation is broken on i810 driver (i915 video card)" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/117573
[07:18] <ubotu> New bug: #116456 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.20 (restricted) "[feisty]  lockups - "ipw2200: Firmware error detected.  Restarting."" [Medium,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/116456
=== seb128 [n=seb128@ubuntu/member/seb128]  has joined #ubuntu-x
[09:27] <bryce> seb128, tepsipakki: I'm curious about the numbering for libice - in ubuntu it has a 2: epoch number, but debian uses 1:.  Any idea why this is?
[09:28] <bryce> same with libxaw, libxext, etc.
[09:30] <seb128> bryce: new xorg has been packaged for Ubuntu first
[09:30] <seb128> and it has extra iteration
[09:31] <bryce> seb128: hmm, now that debian has the new xorg, how do we straighten this out?
[09:31] <bryce> (or do we need to?)
[09:31] <seb128> convince them to update the epoch number
[09:31] <jcristau> our next upload could bump the epoch, we've done that for a few libs already
[09:32] <seb128> would be nice ;)
[09:32] <bryce> jcristau: that'd be a big help; when is the next upload scheduled?
[09:33] <jcristau> "not", at this point :)
[09:33] <bryce> when was the last upload?
[09:34] <seb128> bryce: if the only change is the epoch number that's only getting the Debian source, running dch, uploading
[09:34] <seb128> not a lot of work but that would nicer to be in sync
=== bryce nods
[09:39] <jcristau> the epoch bump is already in git, btw (at least for libice)
[09:45] <bryce> ok cool
[09:46] <bryce> libxfontcache is a bit different; we have it as epoch 2:, but debian appears to not have any epoch on it
[09:47] <bryce> gutsy is on 2:1.0.2-0ubuntu1, whereas debian is at 1.0.4-1
=== seb128 [n=seb128@ubuntu/member/seb128]  has joined #ubuntu-x
[10:43] <keescook> bryce: beforelight> hm, not sure -- double checking
[10:47] <bryce> ok
[10:48] <bryce> bbl (lunch)
[10:50] <keescook> beforelight> it didn't actually fix it.  (there is no patch system in the beforelight package, so your patch did not get applied)
[10:51] <keescook> be sure to double-check your build logs for the patch happening, and then verify your resulting .deb files for the fix (I still see the bad paths)
[10:53] <keescook> if you want to add the "dpatch" patch system, you can add "dpatch" to the Build-Deps, and change the debian/rules to include the dpatch make file.  also the "build" and "clean" rules need to be updated.  "man dpatch" talks about this near the end, but fails to mention the "include /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make" bit.
[10:54] <keescook> build-stamp: -> build-stamp: patch     and  clean: -> clean: clean-patched unpatch\nclean-patched:
[11:44] <bryce> ok, I'll give all that a try