/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2007/06/01/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

asacgnomefreak: ok no problem ... i will have to upload tomorrow morning ... so nevermind ... sorry for the noise :)01:49
=== smm [n=shane@12-216-188-54.client.mchsi.com] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== smm [n=shane@12-216-188-54.client.mchsi.com] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== smcgraw [n=shane@12-216-188-54.client.mchsi.com] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
asachi08:31
Admiral_Chicagomorning09:01
=== asac_ [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== DarkMageZ [n=richard@ppp167-203.lns4.syd6.internode.on.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
Admiral_Chicagobug 71702 bug 68265 bug 7171210:13
ubotuLaunchpad bug 71702 in firefox "MASTER Firefox Crash [@js_FinalizeStringRT] [@js_atom_uninterner] " [High,In progress]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/7170210:13
ubotuLaunchpad bug 68265 in nagios2 "Issues accessing /var/lib/nagios2/rw with www-data" [Undecided,Rejected]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/6826510:13
ubotuLaunchpad bug 71712 in firefox "firefox crash [@NSSRWLock_UnlockRead]  [@__PK11_CreateContextByRawKey] " [High,Rejected]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/7171210:13
Admiral_Chicagoopps...10:13
Admiral_Chicagobug 8626510:14
ubotuLaunchpad bug 86265 in firefox "MASTER firefox crash [@totemScriptablePlugin::~totemScriptablePlugin] " [High,In progress]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/8626510:14
Admiral_Chicagohmm 71712 is in the clue files..thats okay, i'll sort that out later..10:15
Admiral_Chicagohttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/Bughelper/ClueFile10:27
Admiral_Chicagothat was just updated by me...in need of it as well10:27
asacAdmiral_Chicago: any info needed from me?10:42
Admiral_Chicagonot at the moment...10:43
Admiral_Chicagoasac: http://admiralchicago.wordpress.com/2007/06/01/bughelper-clue-files/10:43
Admiral_Chicagoi finished my blog that took entire way too long...10:45
Admiral_Chicagotime for bed..10:53
asacAdmiral_Chicago: night10:59
asacAdmiral_Chicago: nice blogger you are :)11:01
gnomefreakwhat is it with our patches and upstream releases :(12:00
gnomefreakwhy do they take parts of patches not the whole damn thing12:00
gnomefreakasac: same thing with iceape patches i know the one i added they changed part of the file so i have to regen it. but other patches look like they only accepted parts of it12:03
=== gnomefreak looking to see if debian built it yet maybe steal a patch or two from them :(
gnomefreaknope they havent touched it yet12:06
asacgnomefreak: isn't iceape updated in svn?12:36
asacmike probably already did that12:36
asacmike aka glandium12:36
gnomefreaki didnt look in svn i look at ftp.debian.org12:36
asacthere is no new version yet?12:36
asachmm12:36
gnomefreaknot there12:36
asacso what patches do fail?12:36
asaci fixed them here i guess12:36
asaci can send you12:36
asacwhich do you need updated?12:37
gnomefreakwell the one failing last night seems to be working atm ill let you know. so far only my patch this morning12:37
gnomefreakim gonna build orig.tar than do my patch over and see what happens (or should i do patch first?12:37
gnomefreakill do a build before adding patch i think to see if anyother issues are there12:41
=== bluekuja [n=andy@ubuntu/member/bluekuja] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
gnomefreakasac: just to make sure its ok with you iceape version going to be 1.1.2+1-0ubuntu1 is ok? its higher than feisty repo will ever be even if i update it in feisty repo i was thinking of going to 1.1.2-0.mt# or something of the sort12:47
gnomefreakor stick with 1.1.2+u1-0ubuntu1?12:48
asacwhat is in feisty?12:50
asacwhat is in gutsy atm?12:50
gnomefreak1.1.1-3.mt9 = feisty12:50
asacboth official + preview archive12:50
asacthat is preview12:50
asacok12:50
asacgutsy?12:50
gnomefreak1.1.1+u1-0ubuntu112:50
asacis it in?12:50
gnomefreakgutsy12:50
gnomefreaknone are in official repos12:51
asacis it available at all?12:51
gnomefreakgutsy still hasnt been pushed12:51
asacwhere is it stuck?12:51
gnomefreaknew still12:51
asacprobably hangs in binary new now12:51
asacare the packages build?12:51
asacplease look in launchpad12:51
gnomefreakhow do i find out?12:51
asaclook at source page of firefox12:52
asacthere you can find the builds12:52
asactwo links you have to follow afaik :)12:52
gnomefreakiceape source page has no builds12:53
gnomefreakfirefox source page only has ff12:53
asachttps://launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+source/firefox12:54
asachmm right12:54
asaci will try to take care12:54
gnomefreakhttps://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox  is wherer i am12:54
gnomefreakoops guess gutsy would have helped12:54
asacits not there anyway12:56
gnomefreaknope. i think its just they dont want to push it from what i have seen12:57
asactakes time01:10
gnomefreakit does i agree but the 2 people you talked about htis with were agianst having it in repos to begin with.01:16
gnomefreakhmmmmmmm dpatch seems very very slow here01:16
gnomefreakill be back i have to get ready for pysical theropy01:17
asaclunch01:37
gnomefreakill be gone as well have a good lunch01:41
asacgnomefreak: back ... cu02:18
=== bluekuja [n=andrea@ubuntu/member/bluekuja] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
asacbluekuja: pushing04:06
bluekujaasac: great :)04:06
bluekujaasac: I move to kdiff04:06
bluekujaasac: it should use the same build system04:06
bluekujaasac: I'll take a look04:06
asacuploading firefox to gutsy04:09
asacif there are any regressions ... i am away this weekend :-P04:10
bluekujaasac: I'm away too04:12
bluekuja:)04:12
gnomefreakok im back04:28
asacgnomefreak: firefox updated in gutsy and bzr04:28
gnomefreakk ty04:29
gnomefreakiceape uses dpatch (i can swear it does) :(04:29
gnomefreakdpatch-edit-patch 82_prefs_ubuntu  doesnt seem to want to play nicely04:31
gnomefreakit tells me it cant open <30+dirs/file> because they are missing or are not there04:32
asache?04:32
asacare you soure your iceape source tree is fine?04:32
gnomefreakits not there so it will create one04:32
asacin proper tree dpatch edit patch should work04:33
gnomefreakthan during copying* it hangs than finally says cant find04:33
gnomefreakgnomefreak@Gutsy:~/gutsy_builds/iceape/ubuntu-1.1.x$ dpatch-edit-patch 82_prefs_ubuntu04:33
asacif it breaks then it means that there is need to merge/drop/modify patch04:33
gnomefreakdpatch-edit-patch: * /home/gnomefreak/gutsy_builds/iceape/ubuntu-1.1.x/debian/patches/82_prefs_ubuntu.dpatch does not exist, it will be created as a new dpatch.04:33
gnomefreakdpatch-edit-patch: * Copying /home/gnomefreak/gutsy_builds/iceape/ubuntu-1.1.x to reference directory.04:33
asachow long does that step take?04:33
asaci mean "copying"04:33
asacshould take a fair amount of time04:33
gnomefreak1-2 minutes before it ends in failure04:33
gnomefreakmaybe more04:33
asacwhat patch does fail to apply04:34
asac?04:34
gnomefreakdont know trying to make one04:34
asacto make what?04:34
gnomefreakpatch04:34
asacthere are patches, aren't there?04:34
asacfirst you have to find which patch fails to apply04:35
asacthen you have to find a countermeasure for that04:35
gnomefreakyes. the patch i added to 1.1.1 wont apply in 1.1.2 so im doing it over04:35
gnomefreakits still at stage above04:35
asacgnomefreak: if its the patch i gave you04:35
gnomefreakdpatch command04:35
asac... you can take the exact same file i gave you04:35
asacjust drop it in debian patches04:35
gnomefreakasac: no its the one i made04:35
asacfor what?04:35
gnomefreakfor the go button on the toolbar04:36
asacah04:36
asacok04:36
asacthen go ahead04:36
gnomefreakworks in 1.1.104:36
asacjust make iceape build cleanly ... then dpatch-edit-patch should work04:36
gnomefreakdid you figure out version for gutsy?04:36
asacno :)04:37
gnomefreakso i can build orig.tar (that may be why its failing04:37
gnomefreaki havent built orig.tar04:37
asacits probably the same version we have in feisty ... just +1 and reset to -0ubuntu104:37
asacaeh same we have in gutsy i mean04:37
asacah04:37
asacand use -0ubuntu0.mt1 if its for the mt archive04:38
gnomefreak1.1.1+u1-0ubuntu1 is in NEW in gutsy04:38
asacactually i think you just have to use 1.1.2-0ubuntu0.mt104:38
asacwhy do we have u1?04:38
asacah04:38
asacright :)04:38
asacnow i remember ;)04:39
gnomefreaki was hoping to drop the 1u04:39
asacno way :)04:39
gnomefreakok04:39
asacunless you use debian orig.tarball04:39
gnomefreak1.1.2+u1-0ubuntu1?04:39
asacyou could do that ... but then you would have to patch what is currently done during orig tarball setup04:39
asac... in a dpatch that would be04:40
gnomefreakdpatch looks like its gonna drop me in /tmp/ so i should beable to get patch in and roll orig.tar after that04:40
asacit drops you in /tmp/ for patch edit04:41
gnomefreakto use that version i will have to patch something?04:41
asaconce you exit that shell04:41
gnomefreakright04:41
asacit generates patch in original directory04:41
gnomefreakyes04:41
asacyou can also exit 12121 (some value i don't remember) ... to abort04:41
gnomefreakedit file == 2 minutes if that04:41
asacyes04:41
asacthats why i hate dpatch for mozillas04:42
asac... and why i ended up using quilt for our packages04:42
asacas you don't have to use cdbs-edit-patch (which basically does the same as dpatch-edit-patch)04:42
gnomefreakright04:42
gnomefreakcan i exit 0?04:45
asacdunno04:45
asacctrl-d i press to exit and update patch04:45
gnomefreakok04:45
gnomefreakbrb goes for smoke. im gonna assume fakeroot ./debian/rules source uses changelog to give orig.tar the version. and im thinking 1.1.2+u1-0ubuntu1 for version unless you would rather change it to something else.04:49
gnomefreaki think it was corrupt, i think i cloned new before i left this morning and didnt do anything to it and it seems to work now. (i also had to clean up alot of stuff due to lose of disk space.)04:56
asacoh04:58
asacmight be04:58
gnomefreakit worked :) i have new patch created04:58
asacgreat04:59
gnomefreakmerged from upstream? since we didnt use debians build?05:00
asacwhat?05:03
asacin changelog?05:03
gnomefreakyes05:06
gnomefreaki guess NEw upstream release since we already sent one release up05:07
gnomefreakthe more i think of it05:07
gnomefreakok lets see if orig builds05:08
gnomefreakut oh05:09
gnomefreaki hate this frigging way to build orig05:10
gnomefreakmy fault i forgot to add something to changelog05:11
asacyeah05:37
asacits hard05:37
asacif you move diff from debian orig vs our orig to a patch then you can just use debian's one05:37
gnomefreakapplying patch 20_visibility to ./ ... failed.05:40
gnomefreakbunch of these too05:41
gnomefreakdpkg-source: warning: executable mode 0755 of 'debian/patches/38_mips64_build.dpatch' will not be represented in diff05:41
gnomefreak1 for every patch it looks like05:41
gnomefreakattempting to revert failed patch 20_visibility from ./: md5sums match, proceeding ... done (neither success nor failure guaranteed)05:42
gnomefreaki cant even frigging clean05:42
gnomefreak2nd time clean worked05:42
gnomefreakwtf am i missing05:43
gnomefreakand i did move everything out of /mozilla/05:43
gnomefreaki did leave empty mozilla dir there though05:44
asaci am out now05:45
asacanything serious05:45
asac?05:45
gnomefreakits failing to build05:45
gnomefreakdue to the above05:46
asacyou messed up your source tree state05:46
asac 20_visibility from ./: md5sums match, proceeding ...05:46
asacmeans that its already applied05:46
asacyou should have run clean before doing anything05:46
gnomefreak2nd clean fixed that05:46
gnomefreaki did05:46
asacyeah ... but now your underlying source is in wrong state05:46
asacbetter start over05:46
gnomefreaktrying again to see if it fails again05:46
asacbtw visibility has to be  dropped05:46
asacits applied upstream05:47
asacsee the list i send you05:47
asacabout what to drop05:47
asacthose are definitly in there05:47
gnomefreakwhat list?05:47
asaci told you further above what patches need to be dropped05:47
asac7 hours ago or so05:47
gnomefreakfor ffox? or IA?05:47
asacia05:47
asacffox is all done05:47
gnomefreakk ill scroll05:47
asacthe names might not be the same05:48
asacbut visibility is one of them05:48
asacgnomefreak: 20_visibility.dpatch05:49
gnomefreaki dont see any. you said you would send but you didnt05:50
asac 25_gnome_helpers_with_params.dpatch05:50
asachas to be replaced05:50
asacby the one i gave you05:50
asaclooks like those are the ones you need05:51
gnomefreakk ill try them05:52
gnomefreaki think i still have the patch05:52
asacyou have to autoconf update the autoconf patch ... but that should automatically happen on clean05:54
asaccu ... have to do something05:54
gnomefreakk05:54
=== Riddell [i=jr@kde/jriddell] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
gnomefreaki need to find debians build so i can steal a patch from them :(06:13
=== gnomefreak wonders if they applied 15_gecko_1.8.1.3 patch upstream
gnomefreakok im gone for a bit. asac if you come back can you check if that patch needs to be dropped. i havent found deians build for 1.1.2 so i cant see if mike dropped it or not, seeing  as its a gecko patch im leaning towards it has been applied upstream06:50
asacgnomefreak: you can find out07:24
asaclook at bonsai.mozilla.org07:24
asacsearch on MOZILLA_1_8_BRANCH07:24
asacfor the file that has been modified07:24
asacsearch for changes since beginning of time07:24
asacand you will see all recent checkins07:25
=== JenFraggle [n=jen@91.84.43.217] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
Admiral_ChicagoJenFraggle: did you see the planet08:17
Admiral_Chicagohttps://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-accessibility/2007-June/002210.html08:24
Admiral_Chicagoi don't know how that ^^ will affect us / Fx3 / accessiblity in general08:24
gnomefreakasac: looks like 1 or 2 of the files have been fixed (its hard to tell but im still looking)08:46
gnomefreakok looks like i can drop it.08:49
asacAdmiral_Chicago: can you summarize in one line?09:00
asacfine09:00
asacgnomefreak: ^^09:00
asacif you are sure ... drop it09:01
Admiral_Chicagoasac: ibm is dropping official (i think paid devs) for accessibility on GNOME09:01
gnomefreak99% sure to drop it so i did. now i have to see if the other patch still fails and i doubt that site is gonne help but i will try if it fails09:12
asacAdmiral_Chicago: what did they achieve so far?09:13
asacAdmiral_Chicago: sorry for my ignorance :) i rarely use accessibility tools seriously09:13
Admiral_Chicagoneither do i but there is some things about Fx accesiblity on linux09:14
gnomefreakasac: 99_configure.dpatch looks like its only a local patch (it failied to apply but im trying again.09:16
gnomefreakoh wait no thats right its ubuntu1.1.x/configure09:17
asacyou have to keep it09:19
asacits regenerated on clean i guess09:19
asacso you just have to run fakeroot ./debian/rules clean09:19
asacif its not updated look in rules file to find the target that does that09:20
asac(its easy to track)09:20
gnomefreakso my patch/change that i made will show up in that patch?09:21
asacif it modified configure.in, then yes09:22
gnomefreakno my patch didnt modify anything in there (not so say the other patches didnt09:22
asacgnomefreak: you dropped the visibility patch, which previously patched configure.in09:22
asacthats why you definitly need to sync it09:22
gnomefreakyep figured as much but for some reason i have to run clean more than once for things to take like that ive noticed09:23
gnomefreakthe gwget build that i gave up on, it was missing the patch that prevents the autoregen.09:25
gnomefreakdpkg-source: warning: executable mode 0755 of 'debian/patches/35_zip_cache.dpatch' will not be represented in diff09:26
asacyeah might be09:26
gnomefreaki cant frigging win09:26
asacif you keep your eyes open you should have seen that 99_configure has been regenerated09:26
asacdid you see that?09:26
=== gnomefreak waits for the patch to fail again
asacdpkg-source: warning: executable mode 0755 of 'debian/patches/35_zip_cache.dpatch' will not be represented  in diff09:26
asac^^^ thats not a problem at all09:26
asacjust ignore that09:26
gnomefreakok good09:26
gnomefreakall patches leave that09:27
gnomefreakit fails to apply again damnit09:27
asacyeah09:28
gnomefreakasac: where do i look for it to regen09:28
asacin rules09:28
asacthere is a target09:28
asacsomething like09:28
asacTARGET: ...09:28
asacand then there should be 99_configure..something09:28
asacin proximity09:28
asaci guess its clean09:29
gnomefreakwanna laugh?09:32
gnomefreakinstall -m 644 $(CURDIR)/dist/bin/.autoreg $(CURDIR)/debian/iceape.cfg $(TMP_DIR)/usr/lib/iceape09:33
gnomefreak^^ closest so far09:33
gnomefreakcant find a target let alone a patch number09:34
gnomefreakasac: its not in here at all from what i can see. heres full rules incase you dont have source: http://gnomefreak.pastebin.ca/52905109:37
asacgnomefreak: does everything else apply?09:38
asacif so ... just do it manually:09:38
asacdpatch-edit-patch 99_....09:38
asacthen autoconf2.1309:38
asacand done09:38
gnomefreakoh thats it? ill try it09:39
asacyes its always that simple09:39
asacif you cannot enter 99_confi... edit mode09:39
asacthen remove all content from that patch file ..., then enter edit shell, run autoconf2.13 and done :)09:40
gnomefreakwaiting for /tmp/09:41
gnomefreaki run autoconf2.13 when it drops me into edit mode?09:41
gnomefreakdpatch-edit-patch: * /home/gnomefreak/gutsy_builds/iceape/ubuntu-1.1.x/debian/patches/99_configure.dpatch exists, this patch will be updated.  << ignore that it says it will be updated and still run autoconf2.13 to be safe09:43
gnomefreakinstalling autoconf2.13 as we speak :)09:43
gnomefreakasac: firefox 0.4 hit and is upgrading :) thankyou09:53
gnomefreakdpatch-edit-patch: * Applying current 99_configure.dpatch for editing.09:55
gnomefreakapplying patch 99_configure to ./ ... failed.09:55
gnomefreakdpatch-edit-patch: Warning: Could not apply the patch we want to edit -- not aborting, as you may want to work with the .rejs.09:55
gnomefreakthat is bad IMHO asac09:55
gnomefreaki ran it anyway so we will see09:55
asacoh dapper ffox is out :/10:00
asacsit tight10:00
gnomefreak:)10:00
gnomefreakis out is good no?10:00
asacgnomefreak: its ok10:00
asacyou just remove .rej files10:00
asacand run autoconf2.1310:00
asacthen you are done10:01
gnomefreakwhere do i find .rej files?10:01
asacsearch for them10:01
asacyour excersize to find them :)10:01
gnomefreakill try10:02
asac:)10:02
gnomefreakwhat are .rej files?10:02
gnomefreakreject?10:02
asacfiles showing what hunks have not been applied due to conflicts10:02
asacyes10:02
asacif a patch cannot apply some parts then it creates a .rej file next to the file that could not be patched10:02
gnomefreakyes in patched10:02
asacyou can then look at it10:02
gnomefreakdir10:02
asacand manually do it10:02
asacof course ... for configure looking at rej and doing manually doesn't make sene :)10:03
asacgnomefreak: no not in patche10:03
asacgnomefreak: no not in patched10:03
asacin normal source10:03
asacthere should be reject10:03
asacfiles10:03
asacanyway10:03
asacyou have to remove them and run autoconf2.1310:03
asacthen done10:03
=== asac out for another hour
gnomefreakok autoconfig in source dir?10:03
gnomefreakit seemed to work after using dpatch-edit-patch after ctrl+d it updated it so i ran clean now build and they all applied :)10:39
asacgnomefreak: congrats10:42
asacdocument everything properly and commit to your private branch ... i can then review10:42
gnomefreakty10:43
gnomefreakok10:43
asacuse distinct checkins per issue you tackle10:44
asacso i don't have to review one huge diff10:44
gnomefreakk10:44
gnomefreakask me monday if you dont see it10:45
asacy10:45
gnomefreakdo i have to commit each patch seperate or just debian/patches10:46
gnomefreakyou wont have it monday10:47
gnomefreaki promise unless i get really lucky. it failed10:47
gnomefreak/usr/bin/ld: libxpcom_compat.so: hidden symbol `nsHashtable::Get(nsHashKey*)' isn't defined10:48
gnomefreaki have seen that before10:48
=== gnomefreak doesnt remember what you did to fix that last time
gnomefreakim grabbing branch again i want to look through the patches that are gone to make sure nothing like that was in them10:56
gnomefreakcome to think of it i still have them incase of issues10:56
gnomefreakim leaning toward the gecko patch since its full of .cpp hunks10:59
gnomefreaki dont see anything like the errors i got in any of the xpcom nor the patches we dropped/replaced11:04
asacgnomefreak: you don't have the latest11:13
asacsource11:13
asace.g. visibility.dpath is missing11:13
asacwhich you dropped11:13
asacat least parts apparently11:13
gnomefreakso i have to re patch it with new patch?11:14
asacno idea11:15
asacyou don't have latest sources11:15
asacmaybe they are not yet out11:15
asacwhat are you doing?11:15
asaci mean which tarball are you using?11:15
asacto start with11:15
gnomefreak1.1.211:15
gnomefreakfrom ftp.mozilla.org11:16
asachmm11:26
asacinterseting11:26
asacjust wait for mike ... he is often quick doing things anyway11:27
asacmaybe he already updated svn?11:27
gnomefreaki havent seen an svn at all. when i go to it it lists 30 packages none of them are ice anything11:27
gnomefreaki spent afternoon searching for debian svn11:28
asachttp://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-mozilla/iceape/?rev=0&sc=011:28
asacwhere is the problem :)11:28
asacstart at svn.debian.org :)11:28
gnomefreakyeah went there and no iceape11:28
=== gnomefreak saves this link
asaciceape is not fit for release11:29
asacsunbird isn't as well11:29
asacthough i got a tiny window starting :)11:29
asacnot bad ;)11:29
gnomefreaklast change to iceape was 5 weeks ago from what i see11:30
gnomefreakand he didnt drop patches from what i see but still looking around11:31
asacyeah11:32
asache didn't update yet11:32
gnomefreakoh well i tried to get it out.11:34
gnomefreak!info firefox edgy11:47
ubotufirefox: lightweight web browser based on Mozilla. In component main, is optional. Version 2.0.0.3+0dfsg-0ubuntu0.6.10 (edgy), package size 9008 kB, installed size 28608 kB11:47
gnomefreakasac: seems the source is messd up in edgy11:48
gnomefreakasac: bug 10429011:48
ubotuLaunchpad bug 104290 in firefox "cant build from source - FC_ANY_METRICS" [Undecided,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/10429011:48
asachey11:57
asaccurrent firefox just builds11:57
asaci have rejected it now11:58
gnomefreakk11:58
asaclets see what happens11:58
gnomefreakok im out for a while. i wont be here much this weekend but i may pop in from time to time if im home11:59
asack nice weekend gnomefreak12:04
asaci will be out as well12:04

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!