[01:49] <asac> gnomefreak: ok no problem ... i will have to upload tomorrow morning ... so nevermind ... sorry for the noise :)
[08:31] <asac> hi
[09:01] <Admiral_Chicago> morning
[10:13] <Admiral_Chicago> bug 71702 bug 68265 bug 71712
[10:13] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 71702 in firefox "MASTER Firefox Crash [@js_FinalizeStringRT] [@js_atom_uninterner] " [High,In progress]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/71702
[10:13] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 68265 in nagios2 "Issues accessing /var/lib/nagios2/rw with www-data" [Undecided,Rejected]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/68265
[10:13] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 71712 in firefox "firefox crash [@NSSRWLock_UnlockRead]  [@__PK11_CreateContextByRawKey] " [High,Rejected]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/71712
[10:13] <Admiral_Chicago> opps...
[10:14] <Admiral_Chicago> bug 86265
[10:14] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 86265 in firefox "MASTER firefox crash [@totemScriptablePlugin::~totemScriptablePlugin] " [High,In progress]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/86265
[10:15] <Admiral_Chicago> hmm 71712 is in the clue files..thats okay, i'll sort that out later..
[10:27] <Admiral_Chicago> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/Bughelper/ClueFile
[10:27] <Admiral_Chicago> that was just updated by me...in need of it as well
[10:42] <asac> Admiral_Chicago: any info needed from me?
[10:43] <Admiral_Chicago> not at the moment...
[10:43] <Admiral_Chicago> asac: http://admiralchicago.wordpress.com/2007/06/01/bughelper-clue-files/
[10:45] <Admiral_Chicago> i finished my blog that took entire way too long...
[10:53] <Admiral_Chicago> time for bed..
[10:59] <asac> Admiral_Chicago: night
[11:01] <asac> Admiral_Chicago: nice blogger you are :)
[12:00] <gnomefreak> what is it with our patches and upstream releases :(
[12:00] <gnomefreak> why do they take parts of patches not the whole damn thing
[12:03] <gnomefreak> asac: same thing with iceape patches i know the one i added they changed part of the file so i have to regen it. but other patches look like they only accepted parts of it
[12:06] <gnomefreak> nope they havent touched it yet
[12:36] <asac> gnomefreak: isn't iceape updated in svn?
[12:36] <asac> mike probably already did that
[12:36] <asac> mike aka glandium
[12:36] <gnomefreak> i didnt look in svn i look at ftp.debian.org
[12:36] <asac> there is no new version yet?
[12:36] <asac> hmm
[12:36] <gnomefreak> not there
[12:36] <asac> so what patches do fail?
[12:36] <asac> i fixed them here i guess
[12:36] <asac> i can send you
[12:37] <asac> which do you need updated?
[12:37] <gnomefreak> well the one failing last night seems to be working atm ill let you know. so far only my patch this morning
[12:37] <gnomefreak> im gonna build orig.tar than do my patch over and see what happens (or should i do patch first?
[12:41] <gnomefreak> ill do a build before adding patch i think to see if anyother issues are there
[12:47] <gnomefreak> asac: just to make sure its ok with you iceape version going to be 1.1.2+1-0ubuntu1 is ok? its higher than feisty repo will ever be even if i update it in feisty repo i was thinking of going to 1.1.2-0.mt# or something of the sort
[12:48] <gnomefreak> or stick with 1.1.2+u1-0ubuntu1?
[12:50] <asac> what is in feisty?
[12:50] <asac> what is in gutsy atm?
[12:50] <gnomefreak> 1.1.1-3.mt9 = feisty
[12:50] <asac> both official + preview archive
[12:50] <asac> that is preview
[12:50] <asac> ok
[12:50] <asac> gutsy?
[12:50] <gnomefreak> 1.1.1+u1-0ubuntu1
[12:50] <asac> is it in?
[12:50] <gnomefreak> gutsy
[12:51] <gnomefreak> none are in official repos
[12:51] <asac> is it available at all?
[12:51] <gnomefreak> gutsy still hasnt been pushed
[12:51] <asac> where is it stuck?
[12:51] <gnomefreak> new still
[12:51] <asac> probably hangs in binary new now
[12:51] <asac> are the packages build?
[12:51] <asac> please look in launchpad
[12:51] <gnomefreak> how do i find out?
[12:52] <asac> look at source page of firefox
[12:52] <asac> there you can find the builds
[12:52] <asac> two links you have to follow afaik :)
[12:53] <gnomefreak> iceape source page has no builds
[12:53] <gnomefreak> firefox source page only has ff
[12:54] <asac> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+source/firefox
[12:54] <asac> hmm right
[12:54] <asac> i will try to take care
[12:54] <gnomefreak> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox  is wherer i am
[12:54] <gnomefreak> oops guess gutsy would have helped
[12:56] <asac> its not there anyway
[12:57] <gnomefreak> nope. i think its just they dont want to push it from what i have seen
[01:10] <asac> takes time
[01:16] <gnomefreak> it does i agree but the 2 people you talked about htis with were agianst having it in repos to begin with.
[01:16] <gnomefreak> hmmmmmmm dpatch seems very very slow here
[01:17] <gnomefreak> ill be back i have to get ready for pysical theropy
[01:37] <asac> lunch
[01:41] <gnomefreak> ill be gone as well have a good lunch
[02:18] <asac> gnomefreak: back ... cu
[04:06] <asac> bluekuja: pushing
[04:06] <bluekuja> asac: great :)
[04:06] <bluekuja> asac: I move to kdiff
[04:06] <bluekuja> asac: it should use the same build system
[04:06] <bluekuja> asac: I'll take a look
[04:09] <asac> uploading firefox to gutsy
[04:10] <asac> if there are any regressions ... i am away this weekend :-P
[04:12] <bluekuja> asac: I'm away too
[04:12] <bluekuja> :)
[04:28] <gnomefreak> ok im back
[04:28] <asac> gnomefreak: firefox updated in gutsy and bzr
[04:29] <gnomefreak> k ty
[04:29] <gnomefreak> iceape uses dpatch (i can swear it does) :(
[04:31] <gnomefreak> dpatch-edit-patch 82_prefs_ubuntu  doesnt seem to want to play nicely
[04:32] <gnomefreak> it tells me it cant open <30+dirs/file> because they are missing or are not there
[04:32] <asac> he?
[04:32] <asac> are you soure your iceape source tree is fine?
[04:32] <gnomefreak> its not there so it will create one
[04:33] <asac> in proper tree dpatch edit patch should work
[04:33] <gnomefreak> than during copying* it hangs than finally says cant find
[04:33] <gnomefreak> gnomefreak@Gutsy:~/gutsy_builds/iceape/ubuntu-1.1.x$ dpatch-edit-patch 82_prefs_ubuntu
[04:33] <asac> if it breaks then it means that there is need to merge/drop/modify patch
[04:33] <gnomefreak> dpatch-edit-patch: * /home/gnomefreak/gutsy_builds/iceape/ubuntu-1.1.x/debian/patches/82_prefs_ubuntu.dpatch does not exist, it will be created as a new dpatch.
[04:33] <gnomefreak> dpatch-edit-patch: * Copying /home/gnomefreak/gutsy_builds/iceape/ubuntu-1.1.x to reference directory.
[04:33] <asac> how long does that step take?
[04:33] <asac> i mean "copying"
[04:33] <asac> should take a fair amount of time
[04:33] <gnomefreak> 1-2 minutes before it ends in failure
[04:33] <gnomefreak> maybe more
[04:34] <asac> what patch does fail to apply
[04:34] <asac> ?
[04:34] <gnomefreak> dont know trying to make one
[04:34] <asac> to make what?
[04:34] <gnomefreak> patch
[04:34] <asac> there are patches, aren't there?
[04:35] <asac> first you have to find which patch fails to apply
[04:35] <asac> then you have to find a countermeasure for that
[04:35] <gnomefreak> yes. the patch i added to 1.1.1 wont apply in 1.1.2 so im doing it over
[04:35] <gnomefreak> its still at stage above
[04:35] <asac> gnomefreak: if its the patch i gave you
[04:35] <gnomefreak> dpatch command
[04:35] <asac> ... you can take the exact same file i gave you
[04:35] <asac> just drop it in debian patches
[04:35] <gnomefreak> asac: no its the one i made
[04:35] <asac> for what?
[04:36] <gnomefreak> for the go button on the toolbar
[04:36] <asac> ah
[04:36] <asac> ok
[04:36] <asac> then go ahead
[04:36] <gnomefreak> works in 1.1.1
[04:36] <asac> just make iceape build cleanly ... then dpatch-edit-patch should work
[04:36] <gnomefreak> did you figure out version for gutsy?
[04:37] <asac> no :)
[04:37] <gnomefreak> so i can build orig.tar (that may be why its failing
[04:37] <gnomefreak> i havent built orig.tar
[04:37] <asac> its probably the same version we have in feisty ... just +1 and reset to -0ubuntu1
[04:37] <asac> aeh same we have in gutsy i mean
[04:37] <asac> ah
[04:38] <asac> and use -0ubuntu0.mt1 if its for the mt archive
[04:38] <gnomefreak> 1.1.1+u1-0ubuntu1 is in NEW in gutsy
[04:38] <asac> actually i think you just have to use 1.1.2-0ubuntu0.mt1
[04:38] <asac> why do we have u1?
[04:38] <asac> ah
[04:38] <asac> right :)
[04:39] <asac> now i remember ;)
[04:39] <gnomefreak> i was hoping to drop the 1u
[04:39] <asac> no way :)
[04:39] <gnomefreak> ok
[04:39] <asac> unless you use debian orig.tarball
[04:39] <gnomefreak> 1.1.2+u1-0ubuntu1?
[04:39] <asac> you could do that ... but then you would have to patch what is currently done during orig tarball setup
[04:40] <asac> ... in a dpatch that would be
[04:40] <gnomefreak> dpatch looks like its gonna drop me in /tmp/ so i should beable to get patch in and roll orig.tar after that
[04:41] <asac> it drops you in /tmp/ for patch edit
[04:41] <gnomefreak> to use that version i will have to patch something?
[04:41] <asac> once you exit that shell
[04:41] <gnomefreak> right
[04:41] <asac> it generates patch in original directory
[04:41] <gnomefreak> yes
[04:41] <asac> you can also exit 12121 (some value i don't remember) ... to abort
[04:41] <gnomefreak> edit file == 2 minutes if that
[04:41] <asac> yes
[04:42] <asac> thats why i hate dpatch for mozillas
[04:42] <asac> ... and why i ended up using quilt for our packages
[04:42] <asac> as you don't have to use cdbs-edit-patch (which basically does the same as dpatch-edit-patch)
[04:42] <gnomefreak> right
[04:45] <gnomefreak> can i exit 0?
[04:45] <asac> dunno
[04:45] <asac> ctrl-d i press to exit and update patch
[04:45] <gnomefreak> ok
[04:49] <gnomefreak> brb goes for smoke. im gonna assume fakeroot ./debian/rules source uses changelog to give orig.tar the version. and im thinking 1.1.2+u1-0ubuntu1 for version unless you would rather change it to something else.
[04:56] <gnomefreak> i think it was corrupt, i think i cloned new before i left this morning and didnt do anything to it and it seems to work now. (i also had to clean up alot of stuff due to lose of disk space.)
[04:58] <asac> oh
[04:58] <asac> might be
[04:58] <gnomefreak> it worked :) i have new patch created
[04:59] <asac> great
[05:00] <gnomefreak> merged from upstream? since we didnt use debians build?
[05:03] <asac> what?
[05:03] <asac> in changelog?
[05:06] <gnomefreak> yes
[05:07] <gnomefreak> i guess NEw upstream release since we already sent one release up
[05:07] <gnomefreak> the more i think of it
[05:08] <gnomefreak> ok lets see if orig builds
[05:09] <gnomefreak> ut oh
[05:10] <gnomefreak> i hate this frigging way to build orig
[05:11] <gnomefreak> my fault i forgot to add something to changelog
[05:37] <asac> yeah
[05:37] <asac> its hard
[05:37] <asac> if you move diff from debian orig vs our orig to a patch then you can just use debian's one
[05:40] <gnomefreak> applying patch 20_visibility to ./ ... failed.
[05:41] <gnomefreak> bunch of these too
[05:41] <gnomefreak> dpkg-source: warning: executable mode 0755 of 'debian/patches/38_mips64_build.dpatch' will not be represented in diff
[05:41] <gnomefreak> 1 for every patch it looks like
[05:42] <gnomefreak> attempting to revert failed patch 20_visibility from ./: md5sums match, proceeding ... done (neither success nor failure guaranteed)
[05:42] <gnomefreak> i cant even frigging clean
[05:42] <gnomefreak> 2nd time clean worked
[05:43] <gnomefreak> wtf am i missing
[05:43] <gnomefreak> and i did move everything out of /mozilla/
[05:44] <gnomefreak> i did leave empty mozilla dir there though
[05:45] <asac> i am out now
[05:45] <asac> anything serious
[05:45] <asac> ?
[05:45] <gnomefreak> its failing to build
[05:46] <gnomefreak> due to the above
[05:46] <asac> you messed up your source tree state
[05:46] <asac>  20_visibility from ./: md5sums match, proceeding ...
[05:46] <asac> means that its already applied
[05:46] <asac> you should have run clean before doing anything
[05:46] <gnomefreak> 2nd clean fixed that
[05:46] <gnomefreak> i did
[05:46] <asac> yeah ... but now your underlying source is in wrong state
[05:46] <asac> better start over
[05:46] <gnomefreak> trying again to see if it fails again
[05:46] <asac> btw visibility has to be  dropped
[05:47] <asac> its applied upstream
[05:47] <asac> see the list i send you
[05:47] <asac> about what to drop
[05:47] <asac> those are definitly in there
[05:47] <gnomefreak> what list?
[05:47] <asac> i told you further above what patches need to be dropped
[05:47] <asac> 7 hours ago or so
[05:47] <gnomefreak> for ffox? or IA?
[05:47] <asac> ia
[05:47] <asac> ffox is all done
[05:47] <gnomefreak> k ill scroll
[05:48] <asac> the names might not be the same
[05:48] <asac> but visibility is one of them
[05:49] <asac> gnomefreak: 20_visibility.dpatch
[05:50] <gnomefreak> i dont see any. you said you would send but you didnt
[05:50] <asac>  25_gnome_helpers_with_params.dpatch
[05:50] <asac> has to be replaced
[05:50] <asac> by the one i gave you
[05:51] <asac> looks like those are the ones you need
[05:52] <gnomefreak> k ill try them
[05:52] <gnomefreak> i think i still have the patch
[05:54] <asac> you have to autoconf update the autoconf patch ... but that should automatically happen on clean
[05:54] <asac> cu ... have to do something
[05:54] <gnomefreak> k
[06:13] <gnomefreak> i need to find debians build so i can steal a patch from them :(
[06:50] <gnomefreak> ok im gone for a bit. asac if you come back can you check if that patch needs to be dropped. i havent found deians build for 1.1.2 so i cant see if mike dropped it or not, seeing  as its a gecko patch im leaning towards it has been applied upstream
[07:24] <asac> gnomefreak: you can find out
[07:24] <asac> look at bonsai.mozilla.org
[07:24] <asac> search on MOZILLA_1_8_BRANCH
[07:24] <asac> for the file that has been modified
[07:24] <asac> search for changes since beginning of time
[07:25] <asac> and you will see all recent checkins
[08:17] <Admiral_Chicago> JenFraggle: did you see the planet
[08:24] <Admiral_Chicago> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-accessibility/2007-June/002210.html
[08:24] <Admiral_Chicago> i don't know how that ^^ will affect us / Fx3 / accessiblity in general
[08:46] <gnomefreak> asac: looks like 1 or 2 of the files have been fixed (its hard to tell but im still looking)
[08:49] <gnomefreak> ok looks like i can drop it.
[09:00] <asac> Admiral_Chicago: can you summarize in one line?
[09:00] <asac> fine
[09:00] <asac> gnomefreak: ^^
[09:01] <asac> if you are sure ... drop it
[09:01] <Admiral_Chicago> asac: ibm is dropping official (i think paid devs) for accessibility on GNOME
[09:12] <gnomefreak> 99% sure to drop it so i did. now i have to see if the other patch still fails and i doubt that site is gonne help but i will try if it fails
[09:13] <asac> Admiral_Chicago: what did they achieve so far?
[09:13] <asac> Admiral_Chicago: sorry for my ignorance :) i rarely use accessibility tools seriously
[09:14] <Admiral_Chicago> neither do i but there is some things about Fx accesiblity on linux
[09:16] <gnomefreak> asac: 99_configure.dpatch looks like its only a local patch (it failied to apply but im trying again.
[09:17] <gnomefreak> oh wait no thats right its ubuntu1.1.x/configure
[09:19] <asac> you have to keep it
[09:19] <asac> its regenerated on clean i guess
[09:19] <asac> so you just have to run fakeroot ./debian/rules clean
[09:20] <asac> if its not updated look in rules file to find the target that does that
[09:20] <asac> (its easy to track)
[09:21] <gnomefreak> so my patch/change that i made will show up in that patch?
[09:22] <asac> if it modified configure.in, then yes
[09:22] <gnomefreak> no my patch didnt modify anything in there (not so say the other patches didnt
[09:22] <asac> gnomefreak: you dropped the visibility patch, which previously patched configure.in
[09:22] <asac> thats why you definitly need to sync it
[09:23] <gnomefreak> yep figured as much but for some reason i have to run clean more than once for things to take like that ive noticed
[09:25] <gnomefreak> the gwget build that i gave up on, it was missing the patch that prevents the autoregen.
[09:26] <gnomefreak> dpkg-source: warning: executable mode 0755 of 'debian/patches/35_zip_cache.dpatch' will not be represented in diff
[09:26] <asac> yeah might be
[09:26] <gnomefreak> i cant frigging win
[09:26] <asac> if you keep your eyes open you should have seen that 99_configure has been regenerated
[09:26] <asac> did you see that?
[09:26] <asac> dpkg-source: warning: executable mode 0755 of 'debian/patches/35_zip_cache.dpatch' will not be represented  in diff
[09:26] <asac> ^^^ thats not a problem at all
[09:26] <asac> just ignore that
[09:26] <gnomefreak> ok good
[09:27] <gnomefreak> all patches leave that
[09:27] <gnomefreak> it fails to apply again damnit
[09:28] <asac> yeah
[09:28] <gnomefreak> asac: where do i look for it to regen
[09:28] <asac> in rules
[09:28] <asac> there is a target
[09:28] <asac> something like
[09:28] <asac> TARGET: ...
[09:28] <asac> and then there should be 99_configure..something
[09:28] <asac> in proximity
[09:29] <asac> i guess its clean
[09:32] <gnomefreak> wanna laugh?
[09:33] <gnomefreak> install -m 644 $(CURDIR)/dist/bin/.autoreg $(CURDIR)/debian/iceape.cfg $(TMP_DIR)/usr/lib/iceape
[09:33] <gnomefreak> ^^ closest so far
[09:34] <gnomefreak> cant find a target let alone a patch number
[09:37] <gnomefreak> asac: its not in here at all from what i can see. heres full rules incase you dont have source: http://gnomefreak.pastebin.ca/529051
[09:38] <asac> gnomefreak: does everything else apply?
[09:38] <asac> if so ... just do it manually:
[09:38] <asac> dpatch-edit-patch 99_....
[09:38] <asac> then autoconf2.13
[09:38] <asac> and done
[09:39] <gnomefreak> oh thats it? ill try it
[09:39] <asac> yes its always that simple
[09:39] <asac> if you cannot enter 99_confi... edit mode
[09:40] <asac> then remove all content from that patch file ..., then enter edit shell, run autoconf2.13 and done :)
[09:41] <gnomefreak> waiting for /tmp/
[09:41] <gnomefreak> i run autoconf2.13 when it drops me into edit mode?
[09:43] <gnomefreak> dpatch-edit-patch: * /home/gnomefreak/gutsy_builds/iceape/ubuntu-1.1.x/debian/patches/99_configure.dpatch exists, this patch will be updated.  << ignore that it says it will be updated and still run autoconf2.13 to be safe
[09:43] <gnomefreak> installing autoconf2.13 as we speak :)
[09:53] <gnomefreak> asac: firefox 0.4 hit and is upgrading :) thankyou
[09:55] <gnomefreak> dpatch-edit-patch: * Applying current 99_configure.dpatch for editing.
[09:55] <gnomefreak> applying patch 99_configure to ./ ... failed.
[09:55] <gnomefreak> dpatch-edit-patch: Warning: Could not apply the patch we want to edit -- not aborting, as you may want to work with the .rejs.
[09:55] <gnomefreak> that is bad IMHO asac
[09:55] <gnomefreak> i ran it anyway so we will see
[10:00] <asac> oh dapper ffox is out :/
[10:00] <asac> sit tight
[10:00] <gnomefreak> :)
[10:00] <gnomefreak> is out is good no?
[10:00] <asac> gnomefreak: its ok
[10:00] <asac> you just remove .rej files
[10:00] <asac> and run autoconf2.13
[10:01] <asac> then you are done
[10:01] <gnomefreak> where do i find .rej files?
[10:01] <asac> search for them
[10:01] <asac> your excersize to find them :)
[10:02] <gnomefreak> ill try
[10:02] <asac> :)
[10:02] <gnomefreak> what are .rej files?
[10:02] <gnomefreak> reject?
[10:02] <asac> files showing what hunks have not been applied due to conflicts
[10:02] <asac> yes
[10:02] <asac> if a patch cannot apply some parts then it creates a .rej file next to the file that could not be patched
[10:02] <gnomefreak> yes in patched
[10:02] <asac> you can then look at it
[10:02] <gnomefreak> dir
[10:02] <asac> and manually do it
[10:03] <asac> of course ... for configure looking at rej and doing manually doesn't make sene :)
[10:03] <asac> gnomefreak: no not in patche
[10:03] <asac> gnomefreak: no not in patched
[10:03] <asac> in normal source
[10:03] <asac> there should be reject
[10:03] <asac> files
[10:03] <asac> anyway
[10:03] <asac> you have to remove them and run autoconf2.13
[10:03] <asac> then done
[10:03] <gnomefreak> ok autoconfig in source dir?
[10:39] <gnomefreak> it seemed to work after using dpatch-edit-patch after ctrl+d it updated it so i ran clean now build and they all applied :)
[10:42] <asac> gnomefreak: congrats
[10:42] <asac> document everything properly and commit to your private branch ... i can then review
[10:43] <gnomefreak> ty
[10:43] <gnomefreak> ok
[10:44] <asac> use distinct checkins per issue you tackle
[10:44] <asac> so i don't have to review one huge diff
[10:44] <gnomefreak> k
[10:45] <gnomefreak> ask me monday if you dont see it
[10:45] <asac> y
[10:46] <gnomefreak> do i have to commit each patch seperate or just debian/patches
[10:47] <gnomefreak> you wont have it monday
[10:47] <gnomefreak> i promise unless i get really lucky. it failed
[10:48] <gnomefreak> /usr/bin/ld: libxpcom_compat.so: hidden symbol `nsHashtable::Get(nsHashKey*)' isn't defined
[10:48] <gnomefreak> i have seen that before
[10:56] <gnomefreak> im grabbing branch again i want to look through the patches that are gone to make sure nothing like that was in them
[10:56] <gnomefreak> come to think of it i still have them incase of issues
[10:59] <gnomefreak> im leaning toward the gecko patch since its full of .cpp hunks
[11:04] <gnomefreak> i dont see anything like the errors i got in any of the xpcom nor the patches we dropped/replaced
[11:13] <asac> gnomefreak: you don't have the latest
[11:13] <asac> source
[11:13] <asac> e.g. visibility.dpath is missing
[11:13] <asac> which you dropped
[11:13] <asac> at least parts apparently
[11:14] <gnomefreak> so i have to re patch it with new patch?
[11:15] <asac> no idea
[11:15] <asac> you don't have latest sources
[11:15] <asac> maybe they are not yet out
[11:15] <asac> what are you doing?
[11:15] <asac> i mean which tarball are you using?
[11:15] <asac> to start with
[11:15] <gnomefreak> 1.1.2
[11:16] <gnomefreak> from ftp.mozilla.org
[11:26] <asac> hmm
[11:26] <asac> interseting
[11:27] <asac> just wait for mike ... he is often quick doing things anyway
[11:27] <asac> maybe he already updated svn?
[11:27] <gnomefreak> i havent seen an svn at all. when i go to it it lists 30 packages none of them are ice anything
[11:28] <gnomefreak> i spent afternoon searching for debian svn
[11:28] <asac> http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-mozilla/iceape/?rev=0&sc=0
[11:28] <asac> where is the problem :)
[11:28] <asac> start at svn.debian.org :)
[11:28] <gnomefreak> yeah went there and no iceape
[11:29] <asac> iceape is not fit for release
[11:29] <asac> sunbird isn't as well
[11:29] <asac> though i got a tiny window starting :)
[11:29] <asac> not bad ;)
[11:30] <gnomefreak> last change to iceape was 5 weeks ago from what i see
[11:31] <gnomefreak> and he didnt drop patches from what i see but still looking around
[11:32] <asac> yeah
[11:32] <asac> he didn't update yet
[11:34] <gnomefreak> oh well i tried to get it out.
[11:47] <gnomefreak> !info firefox edgy
[11:47] <ubotu> firefox: lightweight web browser based on Mozilla. In component main, is optional. Version 2.0.0.3+0dfsg-0ubuntu0.6.10 (edgy), package size 9008 kB, installed size 28608 kB
[11:48] <gnomefreak> asac: seems the source is messd up in edgy
[11:48] <gnomefreak> asac: bug 104290
[11:48] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 104290 in firefox "cant build from source - FC_ANY_METRICS" [Undecided,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/104290
[11:57] <asac> hey
[11:57] <asac> current firefox just builds
[11:58] <asac> i have rejected it now
[11:58] <gnomefreak> k
[11:58] <asac> lets see what happens
[11:59] <gnomefreak> ok im out for a while. i wont be here much this weekend but i may pop in from time to time if im home
[12:04] <asac> k nice weekend gnomefreak
[12:04] <asac> i will be out as well