/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2007/06/06/#ubuntu-mobile.txt

=== javamaniac [n=gerardo@unaffiliated/javamaniac] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
=== bspencer [n=bob@c-67-189-96-91.hsd1.or.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
=== sabotage [n=sbryan@jffwprtest.jf.intel.com] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
=== merriam_ [n=merriam@85-211-245-180.dyn.gotadsl.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
=== sabotage is now known as sabotage_afk
=== tko [n=tko@jumbo180.adsl.netsonic.fi] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
=== PepperDog [n=fox@221.166.129.73] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
PepperDogHi! I'd like to compile a kernel module for Ubuntu Mobile. Can anyone guide me ?07:30
PepperDogAnyone compiled a kernel module on Ubuntu ?07:33
PepperDogany kernel developers here?07:44
=== PepperDog [n=fox@221.166.129.73] has left #ubuntu-mobile []
=== jsmanrique [n=jsmanriq@cme-212-89-8-169.telecable.es] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
=== robr [n=rob@jffwprtest.jf.intel.com] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
=== bobux [n=bspencer@jffwprtest.jf.intel.com] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
=== sabotage_afk [n=sbryan@jffwprtest.jf.intel.com] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
=== Mithrandir [n=tfheen@vawad-xen1.err.no] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
=== tko_ [n=tkomulai@jabber.hst.ru] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
=== asac_ [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
=== guardian [n=Guardian@mar44-1-87-90-32-28.dsl.club-internet.fr] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
looltko_, mdz: Ack, thanks10:19
looltfheen: So, keeping DH 4 suggests to postpone the "cleanup" spec, or at least to filter heavily the cleanups we allow; what do you think?10:20
=== guardian_ [n=Guardian@mar44-1-87-90-32-28.dsl.club-internet.fr] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
=== guardian_ is now known as guardian
loolMithrandir: ^^^11:45
loolI suppose we can mail fer who I understand has a clue about whether DH 5 is likely or not11:46
Mithrandirwell debhelper < 4 is deprecated, debhelper 4 is fine.11:46
danielsif dh5 does happen, it's almost certainly not going to be soon enough anyway.11:46
loolMithrandir: We're close to 6 from what I've seen in Debian's DH changelog entries11:47
looldaniels: Do you have a time estimate in case there would be some motivation for DH5?  Would it be at least weeks, at least months?11:49
loolPlus, there's the question of Python and dbg packages  :-/11:49
Mithrandirindeed.11:50
danielslool: months.11:51
loolThat's a pity; I don't think it makes sense to restrain to DH 4 stuff for months; what do other think?11:53
Mithrandiron one hand it would be good to be able to push bits back into maemo, on the other hand it'll be easier for maemo to grab our changes if we make the transitions now11:53
=== sp3000 [n=tt@hoasb-ff0ddd00-250.dhcp.inet.fi] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
=== javamaniac [n=gerardo@unaffiliated/javamaniac] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
lool(I would usually stand in favor of spending time to push things upstream, but I find the DH 4 burden a bit too heavy to carry for months)12:07
danielsno-one enjoys carrying it.  i didn't enjoy changing every single x package to use dh4 instead of 5.12:07
=== TeTeT [n=spindler@modemcable178.77-70-69.static.videotron.ca] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
loolmdz: Was outo also taken verbatim?01:32
mdzlool: I believe so, yes01:33
mdzdaniels: oh, hello01:33
danielsmdz: good afternoon01:34
daniels(i'm here more or less out of curiousity, rather than official capacity, fwiw.)01:34
loolmdz: Added to the wiki; thanks01:35
tko_oh, we've been trying to kick outo out.. was it needed somewhere?01:36
loolPerhaps someone can check the changes at bzr.debian.org/bzr/pkg-maemo/libosso/debian and merge some for Ubuntu?  There are a couple of upstream things, and not too much Debian specificities; I think you just want to revert the "Do not ship *.la files" change01:37
looltko_: It's in the deps of libosso-test01:37
mdzlool: might be a good thing to add to TODO01:38
tko_I wonder if libosso-test is up to date01:38
loolIs there a wiki page documenting the deprecated modules in the Ubuntu Wiki?01:38
mdzlool: deprecated modules?01:38
loolThe upstream deprecated stuff such as hildon-libs, outo...01:39
Mithrandirlool: we don't like .la files either, so we'd be happy to take that.01:41
=== TeTeT [n=spindler@modemcable178.77-70-69.static.videotron.ca] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
Mithrandirlool: I am planning to make a status page too and merge TODO into that, but I just haven't had time yet.01:41
loolmdz: Added the review of the bzr branch to TODO01:41
loolMithrandir: Good for *.la files; the other *.la files might already refer to it though01:42
looltko_: Should I best mail the maintainer to merge upstream changes into maemo (e.g. AM_MAINTAINER_MODE, EXTRA_DIST = debian/*, ...), a maemo list, or ping you?01:44
tko_lool, bug + mailing the maintainers would be nice. it depends on the individual how quickly he might react. and the bugs make it easier to track from outside01:48
loolOh right, bugzilla, that was the thing01:48
loolSuper slow though01:49
=== mdz_ [n=mdz@yttrium.canonical.com] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
danielslool: you've just got to make sure it's assigned to a real developer, rather than to maemo qa.01:51
=== agoliveira [n=adilson@201.22.81.110.adsl.gvt.net.br] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
=== bintut [n=bintut@cm47.gamma178.maxonline.com.sg] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
=== doko [n=doko@dslb-088-073-091-031.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
=== sabotage_afk is now known as sabotage
=== Horace [n=chatzill@222.64.161.165] has joined #Ubuntu-mobile
=== Horace is now known as horaceli
=== etrunko [n=edulima@200.184.118.132] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
=== vivijim [n=vivijim@200.184.118.132] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
=== viviji1 [n=vivijim@200.184.118.132] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
=== vivijim [n=vivijim@200.184.118.132] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
looldaniels: Thanks; I filed a tracker bug, bug #1516, and a libosso bug with an overview of all changes as bug #1517; I hope the maintainer will suggest a nice way to exchange fixes03:25
danielslool: cool, thanks03:27
danielslool: ditching .la files is definitely on the agenda03:29
danielslool: we've already done it with some parts of the distro03:29
loolCool; did you so by stripping dependency_libs?03:29
loolThis is what I use in gtk+2.0 and similar GNOME packages: sed -i "/dependency_libs/ s/'.*'/''/" debian/$(DEV_PKG)/usr/lib/*.la03:30
loolHmm that's not anchored; bad me03:30
danielser, no, we just did the iterative process of rebuilding from the bottom up, as we did in ubuntu as well.03:30
loolThe idea is that you can strip dependency_libs in all packages at once, it wont break anything (except static linking), and when that's over, you can remove all *.la files03:31
loolSo it's a too step approach, but you don't have to start by the leaf libs03:31
danielsright03:31
lools/too/two03:31
loolWeird, why does libosso have all the autotools generated files in SVN03:36
lool29 modules have a configure out of 43 modules with configure.ac03:37
tko_we require that dpkg-buildpackage on svn export works, and people couldn't be bothered to run autogen or similar in debian/rules03:49
loolI see; thanks03:50
Mithrandiris that a policy decision or would you take patches to run autogen.sh if configure doesn't exist?03:54
tko_depends on maintainer03:54
tko_it was their decision originally03:55
Mithrandirok03:58
Mithrandirand you don't have / want to use sticks to make them adjust to a common policy?03:58
danielsMithrandir: that process is incredibly heavyweight04:02
Mithrandirugh, ok.04:02
Mithrandirthis is part of why you guys want to move onto gnome.org or is that something else?04:02
loolgnome.org does not have many policies either; mostly some release policies TTBOMK04:06
loolBut at least all GNOME modules do not have autotools files in SVN :)04:06
Mithrandirthey don't have a policy against generated files in revision control?04:06
loolMithrandir: I'd say nobody would have had this idea just because no other module does os04:07
loolso04:07
danielsi'm not part of the sardine stuff: i have git repos with no generated files at all in them.  so i'm perhaps not the best person to ask. :)04:08
loolHehe04:09
=== dreamfly281 [n=e13597@221.220.27.2] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
=== agoliveira [n=adilson@201.22.81.110.adsl.gvt.net.br] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
Mithrandiragoliveira_lunch: can you make sure hildon-fm and hildon-fm-l10n are good to upload?  I think they are and would like to get them in today so I was planning on uploading tonight.04:32
Mithrandiragoliveira_lunch: also, if you know of anything that needs fixing in hildon-desktop, please fix or tell me so we can get it too in.04:33
KnowledgeSo does this mean that the n770 and N800 might get ubuntu?04:49
Knowledgeand while I'm at it...should I keep my hx4700?04:49
happycuberight now i think this is targeted for x86-based ultramobiles04:54
=== fcarvalho [n=fcarvalh@200.184.118.132] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
agoliveiraMithrandir: hildon-fm* should be fine as well as hildon-desktop itself. Just a warning that it does not have much pratical use so far without hildon-theme-plankton which I'm working on.05:42
=== tko_ [n=tkomulai@jabber.hst.ru] has left #ubuntu-mobile []
loolHmm should osso-af-settings really be Arch: all?05:59
loolIt ships files in /usr/lib/pkg-config05:59
=== guardian_ [n=Guardian@ANantes-256-1-2-224.w86-195.abo.wanadoo.fr] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
=== landley [n=landley@c-71-199-114-26.hsd1.pa.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
=== kylem [n=kyle@amnesiac.heapspace.net] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
=== bob_ [n=chatzill@jffwprtest.jf.intel.com] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
=== horaceli [n=chatzill@222.64.161.165] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
loolbzr.debian.org/bzr/pkg-maemo/hildon-1/debian and bzr.debian.org/bzr/pkg-maemo/osso-af-settings/debian are up for review too; added to the TODO page06:09
=== mvo [n=egon@p54a67922.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
=== bspencer [n=bob@jffwprtest.jf.intel.com] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
mvohi. I'm just adding a lpia architecture to apt, could someone please paste the output of config.guess for a lpia system here?06:10
horacelilool, could you please share with me what GTK+ base are you use right now?06:11
bspenceragoliveira  -- want to introduce you to horaceli 06:11
loolhoraceli: Right now I don't need Gtk06:11
loolhoraceli: The first modules _I_ have touched until now build with stock Gtk from Debian/Ubuntu06:11
bspencerhoraceli, what problems are you seeing.  what version of gtk do you have?06:12
horaceliwait for a moment, I am searching the build log.06:13
mdzbspencer: good morning!06:17
agoliveirabspencer: Hi Bob. We are alreayd in touch.06:17
bspenceragoliveira, ah, ok.06:18
mdzbspencer: good to see you on the channel06:18
agoliveirabspencer: I told him already that he needs to use Gutsy repositories.06:18
agoliveiramdz: He's being around already ;)06:18
bspenceryes, he was building hildon-1 but had conflict with gtk.  06:19
horacelilook, I tried to build up hildon-1 today, getting the source from launchpad.net.06:19
horaceliand got the error message that HILDON_GTK_INPUT_MODE_NUMERIC is not defined in src/hildon-date-editor.c06:20
agoliveirahoraceli: I understood that you tried to build it on Feisty, right? The stock gtk there will not work.06:20
horacelihi, agoliveria, this is horace who sent you email yesterday06:20
horaceliyes06:20
agoliveiraDon't you prefer to install Gutsy and grab the packges directly from there? It will be easier.06:21
horacelis/look/lool06:21
agoliveiraAs a matter of fact, I'll take a few CDs with me next week and I'll be glad to prepare an envioroment for the intel guys.06:22
horaceliI would like to, just currently our pdk is currently based on Feisty and have no Gusty in my hand right now. :-)06:23
bspencermdz, does henrik omma come around ubuntu-mobile?06:23
loolhoraceli: Hmm I could build hildon-1 fine here06:23
loolI'm on Debian/sid06:23
agoliveirahoraceli: We are going to change this as all our work is based on Gutsy.06:24
loolhoraceli: How did you get and build the source, and when did you get it?06:24
horaceliagoliveira, that is good. i will try to get Gusty installed on my workstation and have a try tomorrow06:25
agoliveirahoraceli: As I told you, you can install a Feisty CD and just change the apt sources and update. I sugest you do it in a separate enviromment like chroot or vmware. I prefer vmware actually.06:25
horacelilool, check out the source by bazaar from launchpad.net, 06:25
horaceliand I did this 14 hours ago06:25
loolhoraceli: How did you build it?  dpkg-buildpackage?06:26
horacelilool, did you build up hildon-1 with 'MAEMO_GTK' defined?06:26
loolhoraceli: Can you run "dpkg-checkbuilddeps" from your checkout?06:26
loolhoraceli: I just build using the regular process, either debuild or dpkg-buildpackage06:26
mdzbspencer: I haven't seen him around, but he's certainly on #ubuntu-devel and would come over if you asked him06:27
mdzbspencer: his nick is 'heno'06:27
bspencerthx06:27
mdzbspencer: I'm not sure how late he usually works, but I was on a conference call with him less than 30 minutes ago06:28
horacelilool, I guess I might use the different way. what I did is to do './autogen.sh --prefix=/usr ...' and then 'make'06:28
horacelilool, HILDON_GTK_INPUT_MODE_NUMERIC is defined by maemo guys in gtkenums.h and switched on/off by MAEMO_CHANGES.06:29
horaceliand hildon-date-editor.c used it06:30
loolhoraceli: Basically, you shouldn't worry about the way the package is built internally06:31
loolhoraceli: You should build packages, and this involves dpkg-buildpackage or debuild as interfaces06:32
loolhoraceli: For example in your case, I suspect debian/rules passes adapted configure flags, such as --without-maemo-gtk06:32
horacelilool, i am checking the rules. thank you for the advice06:33
mvotfheen: could you please paste the output of config.guess on a lpia system for me? support in apt is ready, I just want to be sure that I got it right 06:33
horaceliit just reminded me.06:33
horaceli'cause I built it up successfully by running './debian/rules binary'06:33
agoliveirahoraceli: Unless you have a very good reason to try to compile the packages yourself, I strongly suggest that you work the same way we do, using Gutsy and debian tools or we are risking duplicate efforts and raise conflicts between the results.06:35
loolhoraceli: Actually, it depends on what you want to do with the package; if it is to verify you can build it, debian/rules binary is fine, if you're planning to develop some feature in this source, you might want to call lower level commands manually I suppose06:35
horaceliagoliveira, I agree06:36
horacelilool, yes. what I wanted to do is to get all the hildon components installed in feisty first ( I will move to Gusty tomorrow) and get hildon desktop running06:40
loolhoraceli: You can install them from the archive directly then; no need to build them I suppose06:41
loolAh soryr, feisty nm06:41
bspencerlool, agoliveira, can't we build a gutsy chroot environment inside feisty?06:41
loolbspencer: Sure, I think so06:41
bspencerI thikn I was shown how to do this already06:41
bspencerby tollef06:42
loolbspencer: If you really want a _chroot_, you can use debootstrap to create a feisty chroot and then dist-upgrade to gutsy06:42
agoliveirabspencer: Yes you can. Personally, I prefer vmware.06:42
bspencerhoraceli, you should use project builder to get you a build environment.  It builds the gutsy stack for you. 06:43
bspenceror you can update your system to gutsy06:44
=== lool . o O ( Hmm what's project builder )
horacelibspencer, i am not sure gusty has already in our project builder or not06:44
horaceliso i preferred to install it and have a try06:44
bspencerhoraceli, I'll check with rusty.  That is the purpose of it anyway.  I'll chat with you tomorrow when you get in.06:45
horaceliI can install it to a UMPC06:45
horaceliok06:45
bspencerlool, project builder is a simple tool to create an ubuntu-mobile stack in a chroot environment and then allow a user to easily create a USB or ISO image for their device06:45
horacelibspencer, so you have already got the gusty source?06:45
loolbspencer: Ah, is this from maemo or from Intel?06:46
horacelilool, from Intel06:46
bspencerhoraceli, we've been using the ubuntu packages.06:46
loolInternal use only?06:46
bspencerlool, just until we can get legal stamp06:46
bspencerbig company, long delays06:46
bspencerbut that is in the works.06:46
horacelibspencer, yes, I know, just we are based on feisty now, right?06:47
loolSo I suppose it'll end up in Ubuntu too! :)06:47
bspencerlool, we would like that, if it is acceptable or something better.06:47
bspencerdoesn't show up06:47
loolIt permits some cool "Mise en abme" situations, where you install ubuntu where you install project builder where you install ubuntu06:48
bspencer:)06:48
bspencerlool, debootstrap was the tool tollef showed me.  thanks for the reminder06:49
loolIf you _just_ want to build packages, then I suggest you go for pbuilder though06:50
loolIt provides a high level interface to "just build" packages and maintain your chroot, basically "pbuilder create" the first time, "pbuilder update" regularly and "pdebuild" to build packages06:50
loolIt's not suited to launch commands under a gutsy environment and display them on feisty though06:51
bspencerlool, ok.  that sounds like what "mock" does in FC (our previous life)06:51
loolhehe06:51
loolKind of06:51
bspencerlool,  but it will create a clean environment (gutsy) and then build your package06:51
loolmock is a pbuilder + debootstrap kind of think06:51
loolBut yeah, that's the spirit06:52
bspencer"pbuilder create" doesn't create a full chroot environment?06:52
bspencermeaning, a chroot with all the dependent packages06:52
loolIt does, but it's different in that it will either 1) create a tarball of the chroot and unpack it each time you need to build something (you can build multiple things in parallel though) or 2) use a special hack called cowdancer which will intercept writes below a tree and create copy on write of files06:53
loolI'm using the later mode which permits building multiple packages at once and is very fast to setup clean chroots06:53
loolmock will not really restore a clean chroot each time, it installs and uninstalls packages06:54
loolAnyway, mock does not handle Debian packages and pbuilder does not handle rpm packages, so... :)06:54
bspencergot it.  thanks.06:56
loolbzr.debian.org/bzr/pkg-maemo/hildon-thumbnail/debian/ available for review07:15
mdzlool: where did these debian branches come from?07:32
loolHmm I created these07:32
mdzis someone working on packaging maemo natively for Debian?07:32
mdzlool: oh07:32
mdzwhy not put them on launchpad then?07:32
loolTo be able to grant commit access to Debian Developers  :-)07:33
mdzyou can grant commit access to anyone with an email address and an ssh key on Launchpad07:33
mdzso both Debian developers and Ubuntu developers07:33
loolOk, let's say it was symetry and independence07:34
mdzI don't think non-DDs can have access to bzr.d.o07:34
loolSure, they simply need to create an account on alioth07:34
loolAnd http:// is anonymous07:34
mdzas you like. it would be nice to at least register the branches in launchpad so that we can get email notifications etc.07:35
loolAh that would be nice indeed07:36
tfheenmvo: that's hard for me, given that I don't have such a system07:50
tfheenbspencer: hiya07:59
bspencerhowdy08:01
tfheengood to see you guys around here08:03
looltfheen: Did you take a look at some of the branches I published already?  Perhaps if they contain fixes of interest for Ubuntu, I can push some of these changes directly to ubuntu-mobile in the future?08:03
tfheenlool: no, sorry, I have been utterly swamped.  I'd be fine trusting your judgement on what's appropriate for ubuntu and what's not08:04
tfheenagoliveira: ok, good.  Prod me when -plankton is there?08:05
bspencertfheen, thx.  Well done on the "making us feel welcome" effort08:06
looltfheen: Ok; do you think I should push to ubuntu-mobile branches directly then? (I'm not an Ubuntu dev BTW)08:06
tfheenbspencer: good to hear, if there's anything more you need from us, please tell us.08:07
tfheenbspencer: I'm working with mdz on getting a set of goals for next week's sprint ready, I'll send it to you guys once it's ready.08:07
tfheenlool: I'd like to just review the branches first, and assuming they're fine I'm happy to accept you into the ubuntu-mobile team on launchpad.  Sounds good?08:08
looltfheen: Oh that's exactly what I wanted; perfect08:08
bspencergreat. I know charlie is working on schedule and stuff to get to you.  We can discuss tomorrow.08:08
tfheenlool: and then you can later make calls as to whether something is suitable for ubuntu or not.  If you're unsure, I or somebody else is around and happy to help you out.08:08
tfheenbspencer: excellent08:09
looltfheen: The changes which would not be suitable for Ubuntu are basically setting the Maintainer and the version number; I don't expect much more to differ, we discussed *.la files already08:10
agoliveiratfheen: No problem. Right now I'm having a weird coredump caused by hildon-theme-slicer related to a invalid pointer when it tries to parse some files to build -plankton but I'm on it.08:10
mdzbspencer: I've received the schedule from Charlie and glanced at it, but haven't digested it yet08:10
loolGrrr the symlinks in the osso-gwconnect tarball are not nice08:12
loolhttp://paste.debian.net/2978508:12
agoliveiratfheen: Are we ok with the conference tomorrow?08:12
agoliveiralool: I saw a lot of links to specific versions of autotools over hildon files. Just replace for the default ones looks fine.08:13
=== guardian [n=Guardian@ANantes-252-1-53-109.w82-126.abo.wanadoo.fr] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
=== doko_ [n=doko@dslb-088-073-094-183.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
loolagoliveira: Yeah; but these files are currently not kept in bzr, and I'm trying to build as non-native, so it made the build rules think the files were available, but these were dangling pointers08:14
lools/pointers/links08:14
tfheenagoliveira: thanks, yes the conference tomorrow is still on, I would have sent a mail to the mobile list if my email wasn't stuff ATM08:14
tfheenlool: I think we just have done an automake --copy --force -a to get rid of those08:16
tfheenbspencer: also, we're having a sprint downtown london in July; you (as in, your team) is welcome.  Again, I'll send an invite as soon as my email is back.08:16
bspencertfheen, ok, let us know and we'll see if we can come08:17
looltfheen: The thing is, if I try to build even the ubuntu bzr branch in non-native, it will get upstream's "configure" script and hence decide not to run autogen08:17
tfheenlool: hmm, ok.08:18
tfheenlool: wonder why our packages built fine, then08:18
looltfheen: You're in native mode I think08:18
tfheenbspencer: July 9th through 13th are the dates.08:18
tfheenlool: point, we are.08:18
bspencerwhen is guadec?08:18
tfheenweek after08:18
tfheenI'm going to guadec for the first couple of days at least.08:18
bspencergood -- maybe we could come the last couple of days of the sprint.08:18
tfheenthat'd be good.08:19
loolHmm and osso-gwconnect is missing build-deps too; I think it misses the whole autotools saga as it runs autogen08:21
tfheenhm, I thought I taught it not to do that08:22
=== tigert [n=tigert@nblzone-208-37.nblnetworks.fi] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
looltfheen: Perhaps the files were not bzr added after your bootstrap then?08:24
tfheenmaybe, and that machine is behind said horrible network so I can't check until tomorrow08:24
lool(Proposed bzr.debian.org/bzr/pkg-maemo/osso-gwconnect/debian/ for merge on the wiki / TODO)08:26
tfheencheers08:26
loolWeird, libhildonmime is newer in SVN than in the archive08:38
lool(at maemo.org)08:38
tkoit's strange that trunk is more recent than latest release?08:43
looltko: Well there are two versions with "unstable" instead of UNRELEASED in the changelog; so I would have expected to see at least one in the archive08:44
tkowell, we're not so picky about what we put in changelogs... :)08:44
loolHeh08:48
=== fcarvalho [n=fcarvalh@200.184.118.132] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
lool(TODO += bzr.debian.org/bzr/pkg-maemo/libhildonmime/debian/ )08:54
tfheenyay. :-)08:54
loolI'm at hildon-fm now; then I'll attach the hildonhelp tree08:55
lools/attach/attack08:55
loolBTW, is there a bzr command to wipe all files in a checkout which are not versionned?08:56
tfheenrm $(bzr unknowns) ?08:57
lool(For some reason, even maintainer-clean doesn't get rid of files in my libhildonmime)08:57
looltfheen: Looks good; thanks!08:57
loolaha, hildon-file-chooser-dialog.c:38:37: error: gtk/gtkfilechooserutils.h: No such file or directory09:01
loolSo I have to upload Debian's Gtk now :-P09:01
tfheenyup, it unfortunate.09:02
=== lool goes for dinner &
mvotfheen: ok, thanks. I added it as "i.86-.*-linux-gnulp     lpia" I hope that is appropriate. easy enough to fix (buildlib/systemtable)09:16
tfheenmvo: yup, thanks.09:25
mvoits in my bzr tree, I plan a upload for a new apt for friday or monday09:25
tfheencheers.09:26
tfheenhaving it Friday would be great.09:26
=== Seveas [n=seveas@ubuntu/member/seveas] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
=== lucasr [n=lucasr@cs164220.pp.htv.fi] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
=== Mithrandir [n=tfheen@vawad-xen1.err.no] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
agoliveiraYes, should be fine. Use the build tools as I said.09:41
=== vivijim [n=vivijim@200.184.118.132] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
loolCool, maemo folks started merging the patch I sent against libosso with the upstream fixes10:43
loolAll *.c, *.h, and Makefile.am changes tfheen, agoliveira, and I did were merged! :)10:43
agoliveiralool: Nice :)10:49
agoliveiralool: That's the spirit of free software!10:50
=== vivijim [n=vivijim@200.184.118.132] has left #ubuntu-mobile []
=== landley [n=landley@c-71-199-114-26.hsd1.pa.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
=== jonnylamb [n=jonnylam@88-108-202-202.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
looljonnylamb: Heya12:08
looljonnylamb: So, as a starter, there's some info on the Ubuntu Wiki pages12:08
loolhttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/MobileAndEmbedded/TODO for example is the TODO12:08
lool(Well, see topic)12:09
loolMost packages but not all are bzr based; you can find them on https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mobile/12:09
jonnylambIndeed :)12:09
loolThe Debian branches are on bzr.debian.org and have a mirror of the ubuntu branches12:09
jonnylambI was looking around on stage.maemo.org even today, amd noted how the packaging could be cleaned up!12:10
=== landley [n=landley@c-71-199-114-26.hsd1.pa.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-mobile
jonnylambOh, is pkg-maemo using bzr?12:10
loolI was suggested to file bugs in the maemo bugzilla to send packaging and other fixes12:11
looljonnylamb: Nope, but the SVN is imported in BZR and the packages use BZR12:11
loolIt seems plenty of upstream folks use git too12:11
jonnylambOkay, let me get this straight: we're getting the upstream stuff from maemo. They currently have debian/ directories. We're aiming to clean up the packaging and send the packaging (and of course any bug fixes) back upstream?12:13
loolSomething like that12:13
loolExcept sending back packaging fixes is probably not top priority versus getting things working12:13
jonnylambHave maemo requested packaging goes back upstream?12:13
loolNo12:14
loolOne big problem is that they are currently stuck with Debhelper 412:15
jonnylambOh, this same code is being used by them to create their ARM debs for the actual devices, right?12:15
loolUpstream, yes12:15
loolBut the bzr branches is for Ubuntu / Debian12:15
lools/is/are12:16
jonnylambOf course, sorry I missed the point for a second there!12:16
loolTime to go to bed it seems12:16
jonnylambOkay, so current _debian_ branches are on bzr.debian.org ?12:16
loolCorrect12:16
jonnylambAnd follow the TODO list on the Ubuntu wiki?12:17
loolDebian branches are catching up on the progress of the Ubuntu branches :)12:17
loolAnd I'm listing them on the TODO of the Ubuntu wiki because I basically do some cleanups which are cleanups for Ubuntu as well12:17
jonnylambHaha, I see!12:17
jonnylambOkay, I'm going to have to have a bit scout about this and then if I have any other questions, may I just ping you?12:18
jonnylambs/bit/big/12:18
loolBut currently the flow is 1) maemo works upsteam 2) ubuntu branched the maemo svn to try to boostrap maemo and will send its fixes at some point 3) debian (well, me) branched the ubuntu branches to also bootstrap maemo and sends its fixes to both ubuntu and maemo12:18
jonnylambAh okay.12:19
looljonnylamb: Sure, just ask around; people should be nice here :)12:19
jonnylambWhere would *you* like me to start poking around in the Debian branch?12:19
looljonnylamb: What do you run, Debian or Ubuntu?12:20
jonnylambDebian! You met me on #gnome-debian, after all!12:21
loolHehe, there are plenty of Ubuntu-runners on #gnome-debian :)12:21
looljonnylamb: Ok, so currently binary packages are available in gutsy, which makes it easier to get some maemo bits; on the Debian side of things, I didn't upload anything yet as I wanted to go a bit further in the bootstrap12:22
loolIf you like, you can try building packages locally from the Debian branches and/or review the existing packages12:22
loolYou should start in the order mce-dev, libosso, libhildon (hildon-1), osso-af-settings, hildon-thumbnail, libhildonmime12:23
loolYou should be able to build all this by bzr co + debuild -i12:23

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!