=== jml [n=jml@ppp121-44-219-120.lns1.hba1.internode.on.net] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #launchpad | ||
mdz | cprov: I have an upload which has built successfully, but the binaries are not in the queue or in the archive as far as I can see | 12:45 |
---|---|---|
cprov | mdz: which one ? | 12:45 |
mdz | cprov: https://launchpad.net/+builds/+build/347371 | 12:45 |
cprov | mdz: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haf-marketing-release/0.3.4ubuntu1 | 12:46 |
mdz | cprov: no binaries on that page | 12:47 |
cprov | mdz: I'm checking | 12:50 |
cprov | mdz: should it build 'hildon-*' binaries, is that correct on 'Resulting Binaries' portlet ? | 12:54 |
mdz | cprov: correct | 12:54 |
mdz | those look like the correct names | 12:55 |
mdz | do they only show up on the source package page when they have been published? | 12:56 |
mdz | anyway, I don't see why they aren't published | 12:56 |
cprov | mdz: no, resulting binaries doesn't have to be published | 12:57 |
=== cypherbios [n=cypher@ubuntu/member/cypherbios] has joined #launchpad | ||
mdz | cprov: source package page | 12:59 |
cprov | mdz: yes, in source package page they have to be published | 01:00 |
cprov | mdz: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+queue?queue_state=2&queue_text=hildon | 01:00 |
mdz | cprov: i.e., https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+source/hello shows (published) binaries, but https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+source/haf-marketing-release says "No binaries have been generated for this release." | 01:00 |
mdz | cprov: aha, thank you. I looked in output from the 'queue' tool and in /srv/launchpad.net/ubuntu-queue but found nothing | 01:00 |
cprov | mdz: it's in accepted queue, will be published in a bit (~ 5 min) | 01:01 |
mdz | cprov: so it will be published in this next run? | 01:01 |
mdz | cprov: so I must wait for that to finish, then retry the hildon-desktop build, then wait for that, approve the binaries, then wait for next publisher run | 01:01 |
cprov | mdz: `LPCONFIG=ftpmaster ./scripts/ftpmaster-tools/queue -Q accepted info hildon` shows it | 01:03 |
mdz | cprov: queue -Q accepted info | grep hildon as lp_archive@drescher shows nothing | 01:04 |
mdz | cprov: ah, looks like it was just processed | 01:04 |
mdz | it is pretty difficult to follow an upload all the way through the process from upload to binary publishing | 01:05 |
cprov | mdz: yes, links are messy and sourcepackage page doesn't present overall information | 01:08 |
=== poolie [n=mbp@ppp112-44.static.internode.on.net] has joined #launchpad | ||
cprov | lfittl: I have disable 'auto-overrides' for PPAs (yes, they were enabled for testing). IFW, now it will respect expanded Section: syntax ('[component/] <section>') | 01:23 |
lfittl | cprov: ok, thanks, will try another upload then :) | 01:24 |
cprov | lfittl: you can blame *me* for passing wrong information, sorry. | 01:24 |
lfittl | heh, no problem | 01:24 |
=== cprov goes for food | ||
=== cprov is now known as cprov-afk | ||
=== Spads [n=spacehob@unaffiliated/spads] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== zwnj [n=zwnj@194.225.70.226] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== chris___ [n=chris@dhcp047014.wireless.unsw.EDU.AU] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== chris___ is now known as RAOF | ||
=== merriam [n=merriam@85-211-184-56.dyn.gotadsl.co.uk] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== jsgotangco [n=jsg123@ubuntu/member/jsgotangco] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== radix [n=radix@70.91.133.157] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== chris___ [n=chris@dhcp047102.wireless.unsw.EDU.AU] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== chris___ is now known as RAOF | ||
=== jsgotangco_ [n=jsg123@121.97.243.223] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== mpt [n=mpt@121-72-131-30.dsl.telstraclear.net] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== jsgotangco_ [n=jsg123@121.97.243.223] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== jsgotangco [n=jsg123@ubuntu/member/jsgotangco] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== kiko-afk is now known as kiko-zzz | ||
=== effie_jayx [n=valles@ubuntu/member/effie-jayx] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== geser_ [i=mb@ubuntu/member/geser] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== stub [n=stub@ppp-58.8.16.153.revip2.asianet.co.th] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== Hobbsee [n=Hobbsee@ubuntu/member/hobbsee] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== neversfelde [n=neversfe@nrbg-4db445a8.pool.einsundeins.de] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== mpt [n=mpt@121-72-131-30.dsl.telstraclear.net] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== BjornT [n=bjorn@canonical/launchpad/BjornT] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== BjornT [n=bjorn@canonical/launchpad/BjornT] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== lengau [n=lengau@c-76-22-213-228.hsd1.tn.comcast.net] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== elkbuntu [n=melissa@ubuntu/member/elkbuntu] has joined #launchpad | ||
BjornT | lifeless: is there no reviewer meeting today? | 08:17 |
=== elkbuntu [n=melissa@ubuntu/member/elkbuntu] has joined #launchpad | ||
lifeless | BjornT: there is, at 1600 | 08:22 |
lifeless | thats 22 minutes ago, sorry! | 08:22 |
lifeless | man I'm freezing here | 08:22 |
lifeless | spiv: ping | 08:23 |
lifeless | jamesh: ping | 08:23 |
lifeless | thumper: ping | 08:23 |
=== Hobbsee throws lifeless into a pool of lava to warm up. | ||
lifeless | awww, how sweet | 08:23 |
lifeless | if a little... permanent | 08:23 |
spiv | pong | 08:24 |
lifeless | == Agenda == | 08:24 |
lifeless | * Roll call | 08:24 |
lifeless | * Next meeting | 08:24 |
lifeless | * Queue status. | 08:24 |
lifeless | * Are reviews fair/balanced? | 08:24 |
lifeless | * Preimplementation call status | 08:25 |
lifeless | jamesh: ping | 08:26 |
lifeless | thumper: ping | 08:26 |
jamesh | pong | 08:26 |
lifeless | its 0600 UTC now right ? | 08:26 |
spiv | lifeless: 0626, yeah. | 08:26 |
lifeless | well yeah | 08:26 |
jamesh | "date -u" says 06:26 | 08:27 |
lifeless | thumper: last call for .nz | 08:27 |
lifeless | BjornT: you talked about review fairness last week in .eu right ? | 08:28 |
BjornT | lifeless: yeah (or a couple of weeks ago) | 08:29 |
=== Fujitsu [n=william@c58-107-52-79.eburwd7.vic.optusnet.com.au] has joined #launchpad | ||
lifeless | we haven't talked about it in .au though IIRC? | 08:30 |
spiv | Not that I am aware of. | 08:30 |
lifeless | ok | 08:30 |
lifeless | final agenda | 08:30 |
lifeless | == Agenda == | 08:30 |
lifeless | * Roll call | 08:30 |
lifeless | * Next meeting | 08:30 |
lifeless | * Queue status. | 08:30 |
lifeless | * Are reviews fair/balanced? | 08:30 |
lifeless | * Preimplementation call status | 08:30 |
lifeless | * Meta review duration | 08:31 |
lifeless | lets do this | 08:31 |
lifeless | == Next meeting == | 08:31 |
lifeless | 2007-06-19 at 0600 UTC | 08:31 |
lifeless | all in favour interrupt the next point | 08:31 |
lifeless | all *not* in favour ... | 08:31 |
spiv | That's also a Tuesday? | 08:31 |
lifeless | same bat time | 08:32 |
lifeless | same bat channel | 08:32 |
spiv | Is the plan to switch to Tuesdays permanently? | 08:32 |
lifeless | I thought thats what you had voted to do. I was surprised that you did that in the convenors absence but still :) | 08:32 |
=== allenap [n=allenap@212.233.37.80] has joined #launchpad | ||
spiv | IIRC, I didn't express an opinion either way ;) | 08:33 |
lifeless | heh | 08:33 |
lifeless | are you fine with this time? | 08:33 |
spiv | Yeah, this time is ok with me. | 08:33 |
spiv | I was just asking to make sure there's no confusion. | 08:34 |
lifeless | ok | 08:34 |
lifeless | so pending-reviews looks like a bomb dropped on it | 08:34 |
lifeless | thats at least partly my fault - I find the incremental branches hell to allocate - and partly the Queens birthday here. | 08:35 |
spiv | A bomb called "first round of a time-based release cycle" :) | 08:35 |
lifeless | quick count | 08:35 |
lifeless | 32 branches | 08:36 |
lifeless | one at 54 days? | 08:36 |
spiv | I have reviews for my two in progress, should be done tonight. | 08:36 |
lifeless | reviewer workload is sneaking up | 08:37 |
lifeless | statik has 5K to review - but these figures are bogus aren't they ? | 08:37 |
spiv | Yeah, incremental diffs. | 08:38 |
BjornT | yeah. bug-workflow-3 depends on two other branches, and the first one is really big. | 08:38 |
lifeless | so we can't really tell a) how many 'units of work' are blocked on review or b) how much review work really is involved. | 08:39 |
=== stu1 [n=stub@ppp-58.8.8.95.revip2.asianet.co.th] has joined #launchpad | ||
lifeless | I've asked SteveA to allocate time to jamesh to implement this. | 08:39 |
BjornT | that would be nice, i've wanted that functionality for a long time. | 08:40 |
lifeless | well the developer workflow appears to have changed. So I think its critical now rather than optional. | 08:41 |
lifeless | SteveA: ^ | 08:41 |
lifeless | * Are reviews fair/balanced? | 08:41 |
lifeless | BjornT: what did the .eu meeting conclude, for anyone at this one that hasn't read the minutes. | 08:41 |
spiv | Is there a record of the .eu team discussion on this? I couldn't find the relevant minutes. | 08:41 |
lifeless | (which btw are not linked on the wiki) | 08:41 |
BjornT | well, it's in https://launchpad.canonical.com/ReviewerMeeting20070523, "if overwhelmed, push back to general queue" | 08:42 |
lifeless | nor AFAICT on the launchpad or lp-reviews list. | 08:42 |
lifeless | oh, that far back. Ok | 08:43 |
lifeless | are you sure thats the same discussion? | 08:43 |
BjornT | the main idea was that every reviewer should be expected to spend a more or less equal amount of time reviewing. | 08:43 |
spiv | Oh, I did see that one. I didn't realise it was the same topic. | 08:43 |
lifeless | no this is not the same topic | 08:43 |
lifeless | let me introduce this topic | 08:43 |
BjornT | oh, then what's this about? :) | 08:43 |
lifeless | Theres been a concern raised that developers that have been around longer are having their code put under substantially less scrutiny than new developers regardless of their development experience. | 08:44 |
lifeless | now, this may simply be that the folk who have been around longer are passing through the same checks and balances more easily | 08:46 |
lifeless | or it may be that we are not actually being as thorough. | 08:46 |
lifeless | I've had a look myself and it didn't seem biased to me. | 08:46 |
lifeless | but I think its important that a topic like this get talked about openly and clearly. | 08:47 |
lifeless | because the review process is a key one, and one that could easily demoralise developers if they felt it was unfair. | 08:47 |
=== geser_ is now known as geser | ||
lifeless | any comment, or stunned silence? | 08:48 |
spiv | I agree with what you've said. | 08:49 |
BjornT | it would be good if the people that are complaining would point out a few examples | 08:49 |
lifeless | so r 4236 was pointed out as a case where someone felt this may have happened. | 08:50 |
spiv | Reviewers can make mistakes, and developers should feel free to disagree with a comment made by a reviewer. | 08:50 |
lifeless | now if you look at that review there are plenty of things jamesh said | 08:52 |
=== spiv is looking | ||
lifeless | he missed one minor thing which is import alpha-sorting | 08:52 |
jamesh | for r4236 (and related commits), we have been working under time pressure | 08:53 |
lifeless | > + stepthrough, Navigation, RedirectionView, | 08:53 |
spiv | import alphabetising is hardly showstopper. | 08:53 |
lifeless | Oh, I agree. But if a new developer is called on it, its fair for them to expect senior developers to be held to the same or even a higher standard. | 08:54 |
jamesh | there were definitely some issues with the branch that could have been done better, but I made the call to get it in so we could fix them and do further work in parallel | 08:54 |
lifeless | right | 08:55 |
lifeless | so we don't aim for perfection on every merge; we're aiming to balance: | 08:55 |
BjornT | and considering the diff for r4236 is 6314 lines, it's easy to miss a few minor things. | 08:55 |
lifeless | - branch size | 08:55 |
lifeless | - urgency of delivery | 08:55 |
lifeless | - overall importance | 08:55 |
lifeless | and | 08:56 |
lifeless | we have an already agreed process for merging things we've decided 'will happen' with fixups later. | 08:56 |
lifeless | AIUI openid was one of those things? | 08:56 |
lifeless | jamesh: ? | 08:58 |
jamesh | lifeless: yeah. We are dealing with an external contractor for some of this, so it is not workable to keep things out of tree til perfect | 08:58 |
lifeless | ok | 08:58 |
lifeless | then I'd like to say in reply to this concern, something like: | 08:59 |
=== dneary [n=dneary@mne69-9-88-163-116-163.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #launchpad | ||
jamesh | that's probably the biggest difference between it and other similar cases | 08:59 |
lifeless | We're not aware of a bias to senior/long service developers. | 08:59 |
thumper | lifeless: sorry, was having dinner | 09:00 |
lifeless | The given example went in under the 'its going to happen' policy where the code is polished further after it lands, and this has in fact happened/is happening. | 09:00 |
lifeless | all in favour? | 09:01 |
lifeless | thumper: no prob | 09:01 |
spiv | lifeless: sounds good. But maybe it could have been clearer that that landing happened under that policy? | 09:01 |
lifeless | I think thats a good point. | 09:02 |
lifeless | I can't remember if we ended up documenting the process, I think the discussion about that got sidelined into 'what wiki page it should go on' when Bjorn was talking with Joey. | 09:03 |
lifeless | but the policy was clear in our minutes :) | 09:03 |
lifeless | BjornT: happy with that response? jamesh ? | 09:04 |
jamesh | sure. | 09:04 |
BjornT | yeah. although, it would be good to make it more clear. | 09:04 |
lifeless | BjornT: which 'it' | 09:05 |
BjornT | to make it more clear, that the branch needs to be landed quickly, and will be polished later. | 09:05 |
lifeless | BjornT: I agree with that. However this branch *was* landed quickly, and *is* being polished. (jamesh <- is that right) | 09:06 |
=== Spads [n=spacehob@unaffiliated/spads] has joined #launchpad | ||
BjornT | when we discussed it a while a go, i think we talked about adding a [fasttrack] tag to pqm, or something like that. | 09:07 |
BjornT | having the policy documented somewhere would be nice :) | 09:07 |
lifeless | right. So I'm separating out the reponse about bias, and the making the policy clear discussion. | 09:07 |
lifeless | on the former I want consensus | 09:07 |
lifeless | on the latter I know we already have it. | 09:08 |
BjornT | there should also be a way of tracking the work to polish the branch. | 09:08 |
lifeless | can you add that to the agenda for .eu and next week's .au? We are about to run out of time. | 09:08 |
BjornT | sure | 09:08 |
lifeless | thanks | 09:09 |
lifeless | * Preimplementation call status | 09:09 |
lifeless | Barry brought this up | 09:09 |
lifeless | are you doing pre-imp calls? Are you nagging when you get a branch that didn't have one? Are they useful? Are pre-imp-called branches better? | 09:09 |
thumper | I think it is handy to have so the reviewer knows that it has been talked about | 09:10 |
thumper | I haven't really been nagging, but then most have some entry now | 09:10 |
lifeless | mmm, thats really just an appeal to authority though. | 09:10 |
BjornT | i didn't have any last week (except for a few in-person ones with gavin), since i was on a sprint. | 09:11 |
spiv | I've had some calls with jml, and I think they've been useful. | 09:11 |
lifeless | ok | 09:11 |
lifeless | * Meta review duration | 09:11 |
lifeless | This was in the minutes | 09:11 |
lifeless | and I'm back | 09:11 |
lifeless | so - | 09:11 |
lifeless | I think the meta-review should stop when the meta-reviewer is satisfied that the reviewer knows the ropes | 09:12 |
thumper | sounds fair | 09:12 |
lifeless | just like a branch is let through when the reviewer is happy with the branch | 09:12 |
spiv | Sounds reasonable. As a data point, I'm happy with thumper's reviewing, so I'd expect the other new reviewers are probably doing equally well. | 09:13 |
lifeless | right | 09:13 |
lifeless | ok. | 09:13 |
lifeless | any other business? | 09:13 |
thumper | just to clarify | 09:13 |
thumper | am I still sending reviews pending spiv's approval? | 09:14 |
lifeless | ask spiv :) | 09:14 |
thumper | spiv: ? | 09:14 |
spiv | thumper: as of right now, you're on your own ;) | 09:14 |
thumper | w00t | 09:14 |
spiv | thumper: I'll review the reviews you've already sent me. | 09:14 |
thumper | ok | 09:14 |
=== jamesh was happy with thumper's reviews while spiv was away too | ||
lifeless | ok | 09:15 |
lifeless | welcome to the non-provisional status thumper ! | 09:16 |
=== thumper bows | ||
lifeless | 5 | 09:16 |
lifeless | 4 | 09:16 |
thumper | thanks | 09:16 |
lifeless | 3 | 09:16 |
lifeless | 2 | 09:16 |
lifeless | 1 | 09:16 |
lifeless | 0 | 09:16 |
lifeless | meeting over | 09:16 |
spiv | lifeless: thanks | 09:16 |
=== BjornT [n=bjorn@canonical/launchpad/BjornT] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== BjornT [n=bjorn@canonical/launchpad/BjornT] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== mpt again finds that a bug he was about to report was reported by Matthew Paul Thomas last year | ||
mpt | Thwarted by my past self! | 09:29 |
=== chris__ [n=chris@dhcp046122.wireless.unsw.EDU.AU] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== chris__ is now known as RAOF | ||
=== tca [n=tom@ti541110a080-6896.bb.online.no] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== BjornT [n=bjorn@canonical/launchpad/BjornT] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== chris__ [n=chris@dhcp046122.wireless.unsw.EDU.AU] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== superm1 is now known as superm1_bed | ||
=== BjornT [n=bjorn@canonical/launchpad/BjornT] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== allenap_ [n=allenap@212.233.37.241] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== allenap [n=allenap@212.233.37.241] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== bigjools [n=bigjools@canonical/launchpad/bigjools] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== tca [n=tom@ti541110a080-6896.bb.online.no] has left #launchpad [] | ||
SteveA | lifeless: hello | 10:17 |
=== chris__ [n=chris@dhcp046122.wireless.unsw.EDU.AU] has left #launchpad [] | ||
lifeless | hi | 10:18 |
lifeless | SteveA: hi | 10:19 |
SteveA | lifeless: in my "away" scrollback, I had some ^^^^ from you. | 10:34 |
lifeless | right | 10:35 |
lifeless | I was giving you hopefully more context than I put in the email you should have gotten overnight | 10:35 |
SteveA | so, it's worth the effort for me to look through the scrollback? | 10:37 |
lifeless | let me recap | 10:39 |
lifeless | reviews are very hard to allocate at the moment because of the use of incremental branches | 10:39 |
=== schwuk [n=dave@ubuntu/member/schwuk] has joined #launchpad | ||
SteveA | lifeless: joey and thumper had a suggestion about having more than one person allocate reviews, concurrently, to take some load from you | 10:39 |
lifeless | all the statistics that had made it relatively straight forward are broken, and the number of branches is high | 10:40 |
SteveA | because we're comparing the work to mainline? | 10:40 |
lifeless | I'm more than happy to have multiple people allocating, that won't solve the root problem though | 10:40 |
lifeless | which is that you cannot use the numbers as guidance now | 10:40 |
lifeless | yes because of that | 10:40 |
lifeless | So I think its very important to either stop doing incremental branches (which has its own costs) or fix the current tool (which requires developer effort) | 10:41 |
lifeless | I don't have the time to fix it myself right now unfortunately. | 10:41 |
SteveA | can you sketch out what the fix would look like? | 10:41 |
lifeless | theres a header in the wiki page saying what branch the diff should be like. the cronscript would be changed to diff against that when its present. | 10:42 |
lifeless | should be very straightforward for someone familiar with the code (and there are two such people that I know of - me and jamesh) | 10:42 |
SteveA | ok. and we need to make sure that forthcoming launchpad features in this area | 10:43 |
SteveA | can cope with the same kind of branch | 10:43 |
lifeless | thats the core of it; theres more that could be done, but thats the key item. | 10:43 |
lifeless | I'm aware we dont want to invest heavily in the non-launchpad solution | 10:43 |
lifeless | and yes the lp integrated reviews will need to handle this situation. | 10:43 |
SteveA | ok, thanks | 10:45 |
SteveA | who can we ask to be a second allocator of reviews? | 10:45 |
lifeless | I suggest bjornt or salgado | 10:45 |
lifeless | because they are familar and in a different timezone | 10:45 |
lifeless | and different country | 10:45 |
SteveA | once we have the single sign on stuff done, I'd like to ask jamesh to improve the review cron script | 10:45 |
lifeless | so they won't typically hit the same holidays | 10:45 |
SteveA | sure, let's ask salgado | 10:45 |
SteveA | would you mail him? | 10:46 |
SteveA | as the coordinator of reviews etc. | 10:46 |
lifeless | and if they do it in their morning we get 12-hour latency rather than 23:55 as at the moment, so its more than just a load sharing win. | 10:46 |
lifeless | naturally. | 10:46 |
SteveA | thanks | 10:46 |
=== _thumper_ [n=tim@125-236-193-95.adsl.xtra.co.nz] has joined #launchpad | ||
lifeless | the SSO stuff, is that days/weeks/months away? The key tweak is probably under a days work for jamesh. | 10:49 |
lifeless | SteveA: ^ | 10:50 |
SteveA | days/weeks | 10:51 |
lifeless | ok | 10:52 |
lifeless | if it looks like stretching out, please consider giving him a morning to see what he can do. | 10:52 |
SteveA | is there a bug on this? | 10:52 |
lifeless | I believe so | 10:53 |
SteveA | the question is, to what release do we target the bug | 10:53 |
lifeless | but with the deprecation of lp-development-infrastructure I'm not sure where to find it | 10:53 |
SteveA | if jamesh has finished his single sign on work, then 1.1.6 is possible | 10:54 |
SteveA | otherwise, we can shoot for 1.1.7 | 10:54 |
lifeless | for single sign on? | 10:54 |
=== danilos [n=danilo@adsl-236-193.eunet.yu] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== mvo__ [n=egon@p54A659F4.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== mvo__ is now known as mvo | ||
=== carlos__ [n=carlos@163.pool85-48-166.static.orange.es] has joined #launchpad | ||
carlos__ | morning | 11:10 |
=== carlos__ is now known as carlos | ||
=== tokj [n=tk@unaffiliated/tokj] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== tokj_ [n=tk@unaffiliated/tokj] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== faidillinger [n=faidilli@abo-49-240-68.guy.modulonet.fr] has joined #launchpad | ||
Hobbsee | morning carlos | 11:46 |
=== Prognatus [n=bjorn@2.80-203-143.nextgentel.com] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== LeeJunFan [n=junfan@adsl-76-204-9-149.dsl.klmzmi.sbcglobal.net] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== barry [n=barry@canonical/launchpad/barry] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== bigjools is now known as bigjools-afk | ||
=== zwnj [n=zwnj@194.225.70.226] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== raphink [i=raphink@nat/wormhole.x-echo.com/x-6cc591a9e805a144] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== TeTeT [n=spindler@modemcable178.77-70-69.static.videotron.ca] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== bigjools-afk is now known as bigjools | ||
=== beuno [i=martin@ubuntu/member/beuno] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== mvo_ [n=egon@p54A675E7.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== mvo__ [n=egon@p54A65221.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== salgado [n=salgado@canonical/launchpad/salgado] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== niemeyer [n=niemeyer@200-103-135-160.ctame705.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== matsubara [n=matsubar@canonical/launchpad/matsubara] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== cprov-afk is now known as cprov | ||
=== Watersevenub [n=Watersev@azevedo.astro.up.pt] has joined #launchpad | ||
cprov | good morning | 02:13 |
Hobbsee | morning cprov! | 02:13 |
cprov | Hobbsee: hi there (note that I'm not mentioning any names today) | 02:13 |
Hobbsee | hehe | 02:15 |
=== zwnj [n=zwnj@194.225.70.226] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== mvo__ is now known as mvo | ||
=== j^ [n=j^@e177091062.adsl.alicedsl.de] has joined #launchpad | ||
j^ | how can i delete a branch? | 02:29 |
j^ | i wanted to add another svn mirror and it ended up trying to mirror a bzr branch | 02:29 |
j^ | now i can not delete it | 02:30 |
=== cate [n=cate@cepew121208.ethz.ch] has joined #launchpad | ||
mwhudson | j^: you can't delete a branch | 02:32 |
mwhudson | j^: you can mark it obsolete though | 02:32 |
mwhudson | j^: can you give some details? | 02:33 |
j^ | what i wanted to do was to register another django svn branch to merge them using bzr | 02:33 |
j^ | ended up to create a bzr branch https://code.launchpad.net/~j/django/multiple-db-support | 02:34 |
j^ | which is wrong | 02:34 |
j^ | why does launchpad add a bzr branch if it can not import it from the url provided? | 02:34 |
j^ | would want to delete that now | 02:34 |
cate | I've some problem on log in. I've no error, but I'm alway "not logged". Some hits? | 02:34 |
oojah | cate: Are you sure that you have allowed cookies for launchpad? | 02:35 |
=== Watersevenub [n=Watersev@azevedo.astro.up.pt] has joined #launchpad | ||
cate | oojah: thanks. It seems I clicked the wrong cookies' button. BTW firefox should have a search function | 02:39 |
oojah | cate: Search for what? | 02:40 |
cate | for the coockies in the allow and block windows (as in the stored cookies list) | 02:41 |
oojah | Ah, ok. | 02:41 |
oojah | Yeah, that would make things easier. | 02:42 |
cate | yes, because they are not ordered by second level domain | 02:42 |
mwhudson | oops, i shouldn't ask for more info then have lunch | 03:00 |
cate | is it possible to close o change status of a bug? | 03:01 |
j^ | is it possible to add another vcs-import to a project? or is vcs-import no longer provided? fail to find a way to add branches other than bzr | 03:02 |
mwhudson | j^: you can only have one vcs-import per project | 03:02 |
=== mpt_ [n=mpt@121-72-129-224.dsl.telstraclear.net] has joined #launchpad | ||
mwhudson | because of the way the importer works, if you imported from both svn.example.org/trunk and svn.example.org/branches/foo you'd get two (as far as bzr could tell) unrelated branches | 03:03 |
j^ | ah ok, in that case i can not use launchpad for what i thought i could | 03:04 |
mwhudson | what are you trying to do? | 03:04 |
j^ | i wanted to merge two svn branches i do not have write access to | 03:05 |
mwhudson | ah hm | 03:07 |
mwhudson | you could try bzr-svn for that | 03:07 |
j^ | requires svn 1.5-trunk | 03:08 |
mwhudson | or a patched svn | 03:16 |
mwhudson | yes, the installation is a pain | 03:16 |
mwhudson | the svn in feisty is good enough :) | 03:16 |
=== Theuni [n=ctheune@uter.gocept.com] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== cypherbios [n=cypher@ubuntu/member/cypherbios] has joined #launchpad | ||
Theuni | howdi | 03:17 |
mrevell | Theuni: hi | 03:18 |
Theuni | I'm wondering how to deal with upgrading a bzr branch that is hosted on launchpad so it becomes usable for tags | 03:18 |
Theuni | Should I just delete that branch and push it again? | 03:18 |
Theuni | When I try upgrading it gives me this error: | 03:18 |
Theuni | bzr: ERROR: Permission denied: u'/~alphaflowforms/alphaflowforms/trunk_ctheune/.bzr.backup': [Errno 13] Can only create .bzr directories in branch directories: .bzr.backup | 03:18 |
mrevell | mwhudson: Is that something you can help Theuni with? | 03:18 |
=== Fujitsu [n=william@ubuntu/member/fujitsu] has joined #launchpad | ||
mwhudson | Theuni: log in with lftp or something, delete the .bzr directory and push again (with --use-existing-dir) | 03:26 |
mwhudson | there's a bug somewhere about this | 03:26 |
mwhudson | https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad-bazaar/+bug/118653 | 03:27 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 118653 in launchpad-bazaar "Need --no-backup flag or similar to upgrade remote repos on launchpad" [High,Confirmed] - Assigned to Jonathan Lange (jml) | 03:27 |
=== bac [n=bac@canonical/launchpad/bac] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== flacoste [n=francis@modemcable040.144-201-24.mc.videotron.ca] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== j^ [n=j^@e177091062.adsl.alicedsl.de] has left #launchpad [] | ||
beuno | where can someone suscribe to a package to recieve email notifications on pathces and bugs (think, debian maintainer) | 03:36 |
=== BjornT_ [n=bjorn@ip-213-190-55-148.static.b4net.lt] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== OgMaciel [n=omaciel@foresight/developer/OgMaciel] has joined #launchpad | ||
Fujitsu | beuno: Heh, that'd be too good to be true. You can get notification on bugs by heading to the bugs page for the source package and finding the right Actions link, but that's all. | 03:42 |
=== OgMaciel [n=omaciel@foresight/developer/OgMaciel] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== schwuk [n=dave@ubuntu/member/schwuk] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== beuno [i=martin@ubuntu/member/beuno] has joined #launchpad | ||
beuno | sorry, got disconnected | 03:48 |
beuno | where can someone suscribe to a package to recieve email notifications on pathces and bugs (think, debian maintainer) | 03:48 |
Hobbsee | subscribe to ubuntu-bugs mailing list? | 03:50 |
Hobbsee | not sure apart from that | 03:50 |
beuno | Hobbsee: but he just wants to be notified for a specific package (his packages) | 03:50 |
beuno | I thought you could dothat in Launchpad | 03:50 |
Hobbsee | you can subscribe to all bugs and such on a package (bugmail settings from the bugs page) but not patches as well, iirc. | 03:51 |
=== superm1_bed is now known as superm1 | ||
=== BjornT [n=bjorn@canonical/launchpad/BjornT] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== BjornT [n=bjorn@canonical/launchpad/BjornT] has joined #launchpad | ||
ubotu | New bug: #120037 in launchpad "Action reported in email as done by owner rather than administrator" [Undecided,Unconfirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/120037 | 04:26 |
=== Rinchen [n=joey@canonical/launchpad/rinchen] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== jelmer_ [n=jelmer@157pc196.sshunet.nl] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== jelmer_ is now known as jelmer | ||
=== shirish [n=shirish@59.95.37.113] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== neversfelde [n=neversfe@nrbg-4db44711.pool.einsundeins.de] has joined #launchpad | ||
shirish | guys can somebody help me, I filed a bug in launchpad & also got acknowledgement for upstream debian bug no. how do I enter it in launchpad? | 04:51 |
=== BjornT [n=bjorn@canonical/launchpad/BjornT] has joined #launchpad | ||
shirish | BjornT: do you have any idea how to do that? | 04:55 |
jamesh | shirish: you want to link the Launchpad bug to the debian bug? | 04:56 |
shirish | jamesh: right | 04:58 |
jamesh | shirish: on the bug page, there is some text like "Also affects: + Upstream + Distribution" | 04:58 |
jamesh | if you click on the "Distribution..." link, you can pick Debian from the distribution list and enter the URL of the Debian bug report | 04:59 |
jamesh | submit that form and you're done | 04:59 |
=== kiko-zzz is now known as kiko | ||
shirish | jamesh: how do I find the url, I got the bug no. I used submit@bugs.debian.org to submit the bug, got an acknowledgement there with the bug no. | 05:00 |
kiko | he ll o | 05:01 |
jamesh | shirish: go to http://bugs.debian.org/NNNN (where NNNN is the bug number) | 05:01 |
jamesh | shirish: it will redirect you to the bug's URL | 05:01 |
shirish | ah ok that's cool | 05:01 |
shirish | yippee, task completed | 05:02 |
shirish | I gotta write that whole thing down somewhere | 05:03 |
shirish | I mean the whole process. | 05:03 |
jamesh | shirish: the Debian task on the bug should now get updated as the remote Debian bug's status changes | 05:04 |
shirish | jamesh: thanx | 05:09 |
=== phanatic [n=phanatic@ubuntu/member/phanatic] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== radhios [n=radhios@96-208-126-200.fibertel.com.ar] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== Hobbsee_ [n=Hobbsee@ubuntu/member/hobbsee] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== mvo_ [n=egon@p54A6685D.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== cypherbios [n=cypher@ubuntu/member/cypherbios] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== mdz [n=mdz@72.165.117.168] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== mvo__ [n=egon@p54A65FD2.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== cprov is now known as cprov-lunch | ||
=== mvo__ is now known as mvo | ||
=== phanatic_ [n=phanatic@ubuntu/member/phanatic] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== phanatic_ is now known as phanatic | ||
ubotu | New bug: #120052 in soyuz "Component mapping for new source packages" [Undecided,Unconfirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/120052 | 06:05 |
Hobbsee | any LP admisn around? | 06:07 |
=== Hobbsee pokes jamesh or something | ||
Hobbsee | matsubara: doesnt seem alive, either | 06:12 |
matsubara | hello Hobbsee | 06:12 |
matsubara | Hobbsee: how can I help you? | 06:12 |
Hobbsee | matsubara: ooh, you are here. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubuntu-meta/+bug/119467 | 06:12 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 119467 in kubuntu-meta "make non-essential packages Recommends and not Depends" [Undecided,Unconfirmed] | 06:13 |
Hobbsee | matsubara: last comment. | 06:13 |
Hobbsee | matsubara: seeing that, fairly easy as to how to help :) | 06:14 |
matsubara | Hobbsee: thanks for bringing that up. I've requested deletion. | 06:15 |
cate | with a nice username ;-) https://bugs.launchpad.net/~hahahahaha/ | 06:16 |
Hobbsee | matsubara: thanks | 06:16 |
Hobbsee | indeed. pity it came up in my inbox, as i'm subscribed to teh bug | 06:16 |
Hobbsee | it's pretty impressive - the LP message ended up coming up as possible spam | 06:16 |
ubotu | New bug: #120053 in rosetta "upstream translation of digikam not imported (once again)" [Undecided,Unconfirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/120053 | 06:20 |
=== schwuk_ [n=dave@ubuntu/member/schwuk] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== BjornT [n=bjorn@canonical/launchpad/BjornT] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== mdz [i=mdz@nat/google/x-8436f482e469a5b5] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== kiko is now known as kiko-fud | ||
=== matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch | ||
=== lifeless_ [n=robertc@ppp245-86.static.internode.on.net] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== zwnj [n=zwnj@194.225.70.226] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== brussel_ [n=brussel@adsl-71-154-207-12.dsl.sndg02.sbcglobal.net] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== bigjools is now known as bigjools-afk | ||
=== neversfelde|mobi [n=neversfe@82.113.106.1] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== flacoste is now known as flacoste_lunch | ||
=== matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara | ||
=== neversfelde|mobi [n=neversfe@82.113.106.1] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== Thangalin [n=jarvisd@S010600195b2546cb.gv.shawcable.net] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== Thangalin [n=Lnjmbp31@S010600195b2546cb.gv.shawcable.net] has joined #launchpad | ||
Thangalin | Hello. | 08:07 |
Thangalin | Anyone know who runs this site: https://answers.launchpad.net/azureus ? | 08:07 |
Thangalin | Is anyone here alive? | 08:08 |
kiko-fud | NO | 08:08 |
=== kiko-fud is now known as kiko | ||
Thangalin | So, kiko ... Do you know who is in charge of the answers.launchpad.net/azureus site? :-) | 08:09 |
kiko | that's a question with two answers | 08:09 |
Thangalin | I don't mind people raising from the dead to answer questions. | 08:09 |
kiko | answers.launchpad.net | 08:09 |
kiko | is run by us, of course | 08:09 |
kiko | I'm not sure what azureus is. | 08:09 |
Thangalin | Azureus is a bittorrent client. | 08:09 |
Hobbsee | yay, kiko! | 08:10 |
Thangalin | So how do I find out who can change something at the azureus part of the website? | 08:10 |
kiko | Thangalin, okay so far. so why do you want to know? :) | 08:10 |
Thangalin | Two reasons. | 08:11 |
Thangalin | 1. There is a spelling boo-boo. | 08:11 |
Thangalin | 2. I'd like to get an e-mail address removed from the website. | 08:11 |
Thangalin | Any ideas on how to go about this? | 08:12 |
kiko | I see | 08:12 |
kiko | what e-mail address? | 08:12 |
kiko | and why's the spello? | 08:12 |
Thangalin | https://bugs.launchpad.net/azureus/+bug/83594 | 08:12 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 83594 in azureus "[feisty] azureus wont open after update of java" [Undecided,Unconfirmed] | 08:12 |
Thangalin | That's the one, ubotu. | 08:13 |
Thangalin | And this page: https://answers.launchpad.net/azureus/ | 08:13 |
Thangalin | "Azreus BitTorrent Client" | 08:13 |
Thangalin | Should really be "Azureus BitTorrent Client" | 08:13 |
=== jkakar [n=jkakar@204-174-36-45.dhcp802.dsl.ucc-net.ca] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== doko_ [n=doko@dslb-088-073-087-069.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #launchpad | ||
Thangalin | For some reason when BUGabundo quoted me, it included my e-mail address. | 08:14 |
=== Kmos [n=gothicx@unaffiliated/kmos] has joined #launchpad | ||
Thangalin | That was some serious quick finding, ubotu. :-) | 08:16 |
mwhudson | huh, whoever registered the azureus project typoed the name | 08:16 |
Thangalin | Well that was silly of them. | 08:16 |
mwhudson | it was | 08:16 |
Thangalin | No way to change it, eh? | 08:16 |
mwhudson | not for me | 08:16 |
mwhudson | you need an admin | 08:17 |
mwhudson | like kiko, for example | 08:17 |
=== mwhudson ducks | ||
Thangalin | I really don't care about the typo; but I'd really like the e-mail address removed. :-) | 08:17 |
=== flacoste_lunch is now known as flacoste | ||
Thangalin | Is that going to be an issue? | 08:19 |
=== cprov-lunch is now known as cprov | ||
Thangalin | Allo? Is this thing still on? ;-) | 08:22 |
kiko | I'll fix it. I'm very busy right now. | 08:24 |
Thangalin | Thanks, Kiko. I appreciate it. | 08:24 |
Thangalin | Take it easy, eh? :-) | 08:24 |
kiko | typo fixed. | 08:24 |
=== _neversfelde [n=neversfe@nrbg-4db44428.pool.einsundeins.de] has joined #launchpad | ||
kiko | as for your email address | 08:25 |
kiko | I can't help you directly | 08:25 |
Thangalin | Yes? | 08:25 |
Thangalin | Oh. | 08:25 |
Thangalin | Anyone in particular I should pester/ | 08:25 |
kiko | and I honestly think it's a wasted effort to even try to protect it | 08:25 |
kiko | if you don't want your email address cited on the internet, you can't use it publically | 08:25 |
kiko | but ANYWAY | 08:25 |
kiko | I will talk to an admin to see what we can do about it. | 08:25 |
Thangalin | Gracias. And I agree with you completely. I have a secondary e-mail address I use for public stuff -- I forgot to use it when signing up at Launchpad. | 08:26 |
=== gianmt [n=ubuntu@host110-22-dynamic.9-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== BjornT [n=bjorn@canonical/launchpad/BjornT] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== lifeless_ is now known as lifeless | ||
=== tokj [n=tk@unaffiliated/tokj] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== `23meg [n=m@ubuntu/member/-23meg] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== lamont [i=lamont@nat/hp/x-c4608a929fbe53fc] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== Gwaihir [n=Gwaihir@ubuntu/member/gwaihir] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== BjornT [n=bjorn@canonical/launchpad/BjornT] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== radhios [n=radhios@96-208-126-200.fibertel.com.ar] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== fernando1 [i=ariel@gateway/tor/x-f6e1f5ed6d882968] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== thumper [n=tim@125-236-193-95.adsl.xtra.co.nz] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== Watersevenub [n=Watersev@azevedo.astro.up.pt] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== superm1_ [i=malimonc@ubuntu/member/superm1] has joined #launchpad | ||
superm1_ | Hi guys, How do you add a task for a bug? Say it affects several ubuntu packages, and I want to notate that as 2 tasks to fix on the bug? | 10:33 |
=== zwnj [n=behnam@213.207.210.231] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== merriam [n=merriam@85-211-184-56.dyn.gotadsl.co.uk] has joined #launchpad | ||
crimsun | superm1_: Also affects distribution | 11:02 |
gnomefreak | superm1_: click on distribution | 11:02 |
=== cypherbios [n=cypher@ubuntu/member/cypherbios] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== PeP` [n=PeP@185.142-66-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== zwnj [n=behnam@213.207.210.231] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== cprov is now known as cprov-out | ||
=== shawn__ [n=shawn@adsl-70-231-227-173.dsl.snfc21.sbcglobal.net] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== mdz [i=mdz@nat/google/x-b716b695aaec1d1c] has joined #launchpad | ||
superm1_ | thanks crimsun & gnomefreak. got that bug cleaned up now | 11:33 |
=== faidillinger [n=faidilli@abo-49-240-68.guy.modulonet.fr] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== zwnj [n=behnam@213.207.210.231] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== doko_ is now known as doko |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!