[12:28] ok im logged into jabber acocunt i think (dont know how to use it though) one of these days ill figure it out [12:28] gnomefreak: what is your sn [12:29] gnomefreak i think [12:29] it just says localhost (0/0) [12:30] gnomefreak: you could just use gnomefreak@jabber.ccc.de :) [12:30] i'm not seeing you...looking [12:30] its says im available [12:30] i'll look again [12:30] gnomefreak: what domain did you choose? [12:30] localhost i think [12:30] JABBER - Error: Jabber Error: No such user: "gnomefreak@jabber.ccc.de [12:30] try gnomefreak@localhost [12:31] gnomefreak@localhost [12:31] thats it afaict [12:31] atleast from the accounts area [12:32] tryingto authorize... [12:32] gnomefreak: you did wrong [12:32] gnomefreak: you have to create an account at a jabber provider [12:32] localhost won't bring you anywhere [12:33] asac: Admiral_Chicago@jabber.com if you want to add me [12:33] you it says 404... [12:33] Admiral_Chicago: done [12:33] gnomefreak: localhost is none-sense [12:34] choose a provider [12:34] great, message me so i can authenticate. [12:34] gnomefreak: http://www.jabber.org/user/publicservers.shtml [12:34] Admiral_Chicago: authenticate? GPG you mean? [12:34] Admiral_Chicago: you should have received and authorization request already [12:35] sure... [12:35] i havent got anything [12:35] hmmm [12:35] bbbiab [12:35] i get service-unavailable atm [12:35] maybe a temporarily peering problem [12:35] my nick is asac@jabber.ccc.de [12:36] Admiral_Chicago: yeah ... i have problems with other jabber.com nicks in my list lately as well [12:38] ok working on it [12:39] Admiral_Chicago: i added you to my jabber.org account as well now [12:40] hmm maybe jabber.com has problems? I still get wierd errors even though I am going through jabber.org [12:40] Admiral_Chicago: you received anything? [12:40] try to add asac@jabber.org as well [12:42] asac: brb [12:46] ok i think im here [12:47] gnomefreak@jabber.org [12:49] how the hell do i read it [12:51] gnomefreak: it worked [12:51] yep :) [12:51] great...pidgin crashes on me [12:51] i had to remove ~/.gajim [12:51] gnomefreak: can you please add asac@jabber.ccc.de as well? [12:51] oh well. am i online though? [12:51] gnomefreak: that is my main account [12:51] asac: yes [12:52] ok i sent request [12:52] it sent even [12:53] ok i see gnomefreak online ... but not Admiral_Chicago [12:53] he logged off [12:53] should i add gpg key info to this? [12:53] ah ok [12:53] gnomefreak: if you want :) [12:54] I use the "Mobile Key" [12:54] you should be able to find it by asac@jabber.ccc.de [12:54] no i'm on... [12:54] did he log back in [12:54] i'm on but i'm not sure... [12:54] something is messed up because it makes it look like everyone is offline [12:55] you have away message up when i logged off [12:55] it has a 2 next to youa d [12:55] Admiral_Chicago: [12:57] my gpg key is DCF833D4 [12:57] pub 1024D/DCF833D4 2005-01-27 [expires: 2010-01-26] [12:57] uid Alexander Sack - Mobile Key - Insecure [12:57] uid Alexander Sack (Mobile Key - Insecure) [12:57] uid Alexander Sack (Mobile Key - Insecure) [12:57] uid Alexander Sack (Mobile Key - Insecure) [12:57] uid Alexander Sack (Mobile Key - Insecure) [12:58] uid Alexander Sack (Mobile Key - Insecure) [12:58] why do i have to keep requesting authorization from people? [12:58] !jabber [12:58] jabber is a free and open source instant messaging protocol, unlike MSN and AIM. Supporting clients on Linux: Kopete (KDE), Gaim (GNOME). For more info see http://www.jabber.org [12:58] Admiral_Chicago: you usually don't need to [12:58] ... just once [12:59] i had to do it 2 for asac and 1 time for Admiral_Chicago [12:59] i think its pidgin. [12:59] its interesting that the most enhanced clients 'psi' and 'gajim' are not listed there [12:59] gnomefreak: you did it twice for me because you added jabber.org + jabber.ccc.de :) [12:59] might be a bug. [01:00] oh ok [01:00] yes gaim is not really enhanced on jabber [01:00] its good if you use other protocols though [01:00] if you use kde you would want to use PSI which uses Qt [01:00] and implements almost all jabber features [01:00] for gnome its gajim [01:00] i'll try that... [01:01] this reminds me alot like gaim [01:01] both ship gpg support out of the box [01:01] gnomefreak: yeah i think thats the intention of the name gajim :) [01:01] :) good point [01:02] interstingly, gaim is now pidgin ... bug gajim stays :) [01:02] yep [01:04] !gpg [01:04] gpg is the GNU Privacy Guard. See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/GnuPrivacyGuardHowto and class #8 on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ClassroomTranscripts [01:04] i need to regenerate a key [01:04] http://gnomefreak.pastebin.ca/559905 [01:05] i updated the text a bit [01:05] but please lets go over it again tomorrow [01:05] i just didn't want to loose my changes [01:06] gnomefreak: ^^^ [01:07] k [01:09] am i away on jabbas? [01:12] jabber even [01:13] asac: ok saved your settings locally and we can review it tomorrow or later this week i have a few appointments tomorrow === gnomefreak will shut repo down tonight most likely to upload trunk update [01:15] gnomefreak: yeah you are away :) [01:15] yeah i fixed it [01:15] gajim has some problems recently to detect your activity from X session [01:16] gnomefreak: Admiral_Chicago do java applets work for you in gutsy? [01:16] asac: that java bug from this morning? [01:17] no [01:17] i mean in general? [01:17] i think so [01:17] does java plugin work for you at all [01:17] can you verify that please [01:17] java.com works fine here [01:17] its most important that it works [01:18] gnomefreak: you can play games? [01:18] give me a few and ill try pogo [01:21] waiting for it to load [01:22] mother [01:22] telling me i dont have plugin to play [01:23] iirc this works fine in iceape [01:23] thats what i was using to play [01:23] did this start with plugin finder update? [01:24] same issue from the bug this morning [01:24] still hasnt tested java5 that will have to wait till tomorrow [01:25] ok im gone for a while, i might peep in later but i doubt it [01:25] asac: i'm not on Gutdsy yet. i need a stable maching atm [01:25] Admiral_Chicago: does it work on feisty? [01:26] never had a problem with java applets, i'm using java 6 [01:26] maybe check if it works with java5 and java6 [01:26] or jusdt java6 [01:26] someone hava a link? [01:27] yeah its on that damn bug [01:27] dont remember it though [01:27] i just tried pogo.com but you need account [01:27] ok really gone now [01:32] feisty is not what bothers me [01:32] its just gutsy [01:32] Admiral_Chicago: you should be able to test in a gutsy chroot though. [01:33] but if you don't want to setup one ... no problem as well. [01:33] ok i am off [01:33] its late [01:33] night [01:43] i'll have to look at chroors. [01:43] i've never played with chroots === cjwatson [n=cjwatson@82-69-40-219.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === smcgraw [n=shane@12-216-188-54.client.mchsi.com] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === asac_ [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [09:46] bug 119955 [09:46] Launchpad bug 119955 in firefox "Firefox responds so slowly " [Low,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/119955 [09:59] asac: iirc you had wanted to change the way iceape builds, while your looking at the conflicts are you gonna change it or are you gonna wait a while? [09:59] i wanted to change the way iceape builds [09:59] ?? [09:59] please refresh my memory [10:02] you had me grab diffs and post them on my site, you never explained what you were gonna change but you had said you wanted to change it [10:03] here are the diffs incase you forgot and maybe they will refresh your memory http://gnomefreak.youmortals.com/ === gnomefreak trying something stupid but trying anyway [10:05] gnomefreak: i am sorry ... i am completely lost [10:06] maybe we can dig some irc log context, so I can remember? [10:06] when was tah? [10:08] 2007-04-24 [10:08] we talked about it that day. [10:09] !logs [10:09] Channel logs can be found at http://people.ubuntu.com/~fabbione/irclogs [10:10] i think the movement of tabbed windows is greatly improved in Fx trunk [10:10] much easier to use than a little arrow for all the information [10:15] it looks like ubuntulog was offline that day for most of it so there are no longs for it there :( === gnomefreak doesnt have logs that far back === Admiral_Chicago can look [10:15] i believe it was early to mid afternoon my time EST [10:15] its only 4:15 :( === DarkMageZ [n=richard@ppp167-203.lns4.syd6.internode.on.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [10:17] ah no i don't have them...sorry [10:17] there was a two week period when i used konversation, didn't log then [10:17] switched back to irssi with logging... [10:23] Admiral_Chicago: so you are testing trunk ... nice! [10:23] if you have any issues, bug reports are welcome [10:23] in fact upstream wants us to provide feedback [10:26] Admiral_Chicago: trunk update in repo btw [10:26] bug 118586 is a feature afaik [10:26] Launchpad bug 118586 in firefox "Firefox halts keyboard scrolling after embedded Flash video" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/118586 [10:26] flash needs to steal the focus for stuff like games etc. [10:26] that bug was in my inbox this mornig [10:27] i've had no issues so far asac, some UI feedback really [10:27] but i can get to that in the morning.... [10:27] actually i don't have that issue with gnash [10:27] is there a cnertal place for feedback or do we report ubgs [10:27] so i assume its a nonfree-flashplayer issue [10:27] (though I couldn't verify that its really like the bug report claims) [10:28] gnomefreak: we report bugs [10:28] gnomefreak: we have to push firefox-preview [10:28] so we have a package where we can file bugs in lp against [10:28] basically, when you enter the area of the embedded flash video (could be a sound clip, video game, video) [10:28] asac: i have firefox-trunk built for gutsy [10:28] it takes focus i case its like a video game that needs teh arrow keys for example [10:28] by mistake but its built [10:29] i'm thinking the way flash is interpreted is one element that can't diffirentiate between the types of content [10:29] gnomefreak: did you need any modifications? [10:29] .e.g for latest trunk? [10:29] asac: nope [10:29] or just whats in current bzr [10:29] good [10:30] current bzr but built for 20070608 [10:30] i will create a 'preview' branch then ... which we can use to prepare the -preview package [10:30] this is likely due to the way flash player reads embbeded content...but not our issue [10:30] Admiral_Chicago: maybe [10:31] i can say +1 that this is a feature [10:31] however ... taking the focus without a click (or a mouse-wheel spin) is not nice, right? [10:31] asac: renaming the packge will prevent upgrade to succeed [10:31] occurs in Windows XP + firefox [10:31] not sure if it happens in Vista + IE, nor do I care... [10:31] gnomefreak: its ment to be a separate package ... e.g. people should not automatically upgrade from -trunk to -preview [10:31] k [10:32] as people that use -trunk want the latest and get regular CVS updates [10:32] asac: from other OSs I can this is expected behavior from flash player. [10:32] Admiral_Chicago: feel free to explain that in bug and reject it [10:32] will do [10:32] tell them about game :) [10:33] if the reporter insists then it should be reassigned to flashplayer-nonfree [10:38] done [10:38] and let them reject it... [10:39] is there anyone actively working on flsah bugs? [10:39] i havent seen any real actions on them in a long time [10:40] gnomefreak: me :) [10:40] ah :) [10:40] actually i have to touch the package soon [10:40] freddy@omg-gnus:~$ bugnumbers -p flashplugin-nonfree [10:40] like in free-flash spec [10:40] what the heck... [10:40] bug 50839 [10:40] Launchpad bug 50839 in flashplugin-nonfree "If the mouse is hold on a flash animation keyboard and mouse scrolling stop to work" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/50839 [10:40] didn't i just reject a similar bug... [10:41] looking now.. [10:42] odd that they have upsteam bug tracker [10:43] would bug 49613 be a candidate for high priority... [10:43] Launchpad bug 49613 in flashplugin-nonfree "flash plugin always rendered on top of html" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/49613 === Admiral_Chicago would think so but maybe not... [10:43] i'm going to bed [10:45] Admiral_Chicago: night [11:10] night Admiral_Chicago === gnomefreak knows im late [11:11] night Admiral_Chicago, morning the rest of you :) [11:12] with ubuntu feisty. i've got libnspr-dev & libnspr4 & firefox-dev installed but diamond-x plugin runs into a compiler issue with nspr http://pastebin.ca/560994 [11:13] morning hjmf [11:23] asac: trunk is alpha6 [11:23] atleast that is what it says in help>about [11:26] yes ... thats next release [11:29] next release will be alpha7 or beta or rc not sure how they do version names like that [11:29] 6 released already === cjwatson [n=cjwatson@82-69-40-219.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [11:38] 6 released? [11:38] is it on ftp servers? [11:38] afaik we have code freeze today for alpha6 [11:38] gnomefreak: ^^ ? [11:41] from what help>about says its alpha 6 [11:42] Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9a6pre) Gecko/20070611 GranParadiso/3.0a6pre [11:42] maybe thats pre alpha? [11:44] the release notes page gives a 404 so i was unable to see what has been done [11:56] yeah ... they bump version info before release [11:56] anyway its not alpha6 ... since its not released yet [11:56] there might still be changes for blockers landing [11:57] oh ok === gnomefreak trusted what i read, next time i rethink it ;) [12:04] no its ok [12:04] but thats the way it works [12:04] the bump version before they freeze [12:04] ah ok [12:04] and wait if any serious issues pop up before they release [12:05] is there a way to tell without going to search mozilla site if its been released or if its pre-release [12:33] blog [12:33] probably mozillazine news feed should be enough if you don't want to subscribe to mozilla planet [12:34] ah ok [12:37] asac: you may need to hang around for a little it [12:37] bit === bharat862004 [n=bharat@122.167.187.153] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [12:37] this issue may be really bad [12:37] hi bharat862004 [12:37] hi [12:38] bharat862004: try a new profile see if it starts than. is this in feisty? [12:38] ok let me tell u the whole problem [12:38] good idea [12:42] i'm using ubuntu 6.06 version... and i can recover back by firefox by replacing with new profile by using this command " mv /.mozilla /.mozilla.bak " ..... and when i install this add-on ("IMAGELIKEOPERA") and after changing the settings of this add-on when i restart my firefox i get this error " error launching browser window:no XBL binding for browser "... i'm using this add-on so images won [12:42] won't be loaded when i visit adult site.... this is the whole problem now. [12:43] i have already downlaod the latest version of firefox and its in firefox.tar.gz format. [12:44] gnomefreak: r u their ??? [12:44] have you tried flash and or java to view the images. that extension isnt supported by ubuntu so you would have to file a bug with the maker of that extension. in dapper 1.5.0.12 shouldnt have this issue [12:44] bharat862004: yes im typing [12:44] u mean i cannot use that add-on ?? [12:45] bharat862004: as for the extension you wont beablet o use it with firefox sinces it stopping it from working. [12:45] on my ubuntu 6.06 [12:45] gnomefreak: do u have any alternative ? [12:46] gnomefreak: what if i install the latest version of firefox and then try to use the add-on.... that should work i guess ? [12:46] bharat862004: yes its conflicting with something firefox uses. i have never heard of it and im fairly sure you didnt find it at mozilla.com/org so you would have to talk to the extensions writer/maintainer for a fix for that. give me a site you cant view images on and i should beablet o tell you what you need, most of time java or flash work fine [12:46] bharat862004: no [12:47] bharat862004: the extension is the issue not the version of firefox [12:47] gnomefreak: i found that add-on on mozilla.com/org site dude [12:47] bharat862004: can i have link please [12:47] ok [12:47] asac: you have link to planet mozilla [12:48] http://planet.mozilla.org/ [12:48] ty :) [12:48] asac: have you heard of the above extension? [12:49] ok this is the add-on i am talking about link " https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1672 " === DarkMageZ [n=richard@ppp167-203.lns4.syd6.internode.on.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [12:49] brb looking [12:49] ok [12:51] bharat862004: its the same extension version for all of 2.0.0.* releases as well as 1.5.* releases im willing to bet it wont work on 2.0 either. [12:51] gnomefreak: holy $hit [12:51] i need that badly [12:51] you need to contact the owner of the extension to help you fix it [12:52] gnomefreak: i have one doubt do u work for mozilla ???????? [12:52] bharat862004: we cant support non ubuntu packaged extensions as there are so damn many and alot fo them are written badly or nonfree, ect... [12:52] bharat862004: no we are ubuntu-mozilla [12:53] bharat862004: mozilla wont support that one either [12:53] gnomefreak: so u get paid for it right ??? [12:53] you need to contact the owner of it [12:53] bharat862004: no [12:53] ok now i hav other problem [12:53] want someone that gets paid for it to repeat what i said? [12:55] i have downlaoded firefox.tar.gz file coz i cannot download firefox every time separately from repositories.... as i have limited bandwidth usage.... so how do i install from firefox.tar.gz file.... i need to update my firefox [12:55] !firefox [12:55] firefox is the default web-browser on Ubuntu. To install the latest version, see https://help.ubuntu.com/community/FirefoxNewVersion Installing plugins: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FirefoxPlugins [12:55] go to the firefoxnewversion [12:55] link [12:56] i already have downloaded the file its in *.tar.gz format [12:56] bharat862004: read the link it gives you step by step instructions on how to do it (or you can unpack tar cd into new dir and run ./firefox [12:56] bharat862004: the link is pretty much copy and paste [12:58] the command ./firefox is not working dude [12:59] gnomefreak: u their ?? [12:59] than your not cd'ed into the new dir after unpacking it. hint easy way use my repo [01:00] bharat862004: i have 2.0 backported to dapper in my repo so when EOS comes for 1.5 branch we can backport itto backport repos [01:00] u dont understand my problem.... i cannot do that everything... i have limited bandwidht usage re [01:01] bharat862004: downloading the tar takes more bacnwidth. but you get the tar unpack it cd into new dir and run ./firefox it will work as i do it here every day [01:02] ok tell me how to go about from the beginning i have the firefox.tar.gz.... next ??? [01:02] ***MEMORY-WARNING***: firefox-bin[27194] : GSlice: g_thread_init() must be called before all other GLib functions; memory corruption due to late invocation of g_thread_init() has been detected; this program is likely to crash, leak or unexpectedly abort soon... [01:02] might get that but it still runs [01:03] ok thanks anyways i will go now :) [01:03] bharat862004: unpack the tarball tar -zvxf firefox....tar.gz replace firefox.... with name [01:03] ok tell me [01:03] than cd firefox [01:03] if that is name of dir. [01:03] ok next ? [01:03] than ./firefox [01:04] where should i run that command "./firefox ? [01:04] gnomefreak@GutsyGibbon:~/upstream_ffox/firefox$ ./firefox [01:04] your dirs will be different or might be [01:05] since i made upstream_ffox dir to keep ~/ clean [01:05] once you unpack it you will see a dir named firefox [01:05] cd firefox [01:05] than ./firefox [01:05] ok [01:05] bharat862004: make sure all firefoxs are closed first [01:05] ko [01:06] ok updated.... but got hell lot of warning and error's in the terminal.... $hit [01:07] trying my luck with the add-on now... wait [01:07] bharat862004: its not updated its just running [01:07] bharat862004: you would need to follow the instructions on the link i gave above to use extension [01:08] or add it to upstream build that you are running but thats harder than it sounds [01:08] what ??? u mean its not installed... its just running from the firefox folder.... ??????? [01:08] bharat862004: yes [01:09] oh no [01:09] bharat862004: you HAVE to follow the instructions on the link i gave you to install it [01:09] ok tell me what 2 do now... i am listening to u [01:09] bharat862004: READ the link please [01:10] ok reading [01:10] asac: did you get sunbird built ok? [01:10] im catching up on the feeds and looks like there will be a rc2 [01:12] oh that cant be good. seamonkey branding is no longer free << as in firefox or tbirds [01:15] gnomefreak: yeah :) [01:15] gnomefreak: thats a pretty long procedure they have mentioned just to update or install the latest version of firefox... :( [01:15] gnomefreak: i remember exactly how the seamonkey council swear that it will stay free [01:16] i said ' i don't believe you, we are going iceape' [01:16] bharat862004: its not suppported by ubuntu so it wont be too easy [01:16] they said: trust me [01:16] i said: like we trust your previously firefox branding policy? no go! [01:16] i thought they were keeping it free too [01:16] this blows chunks [01:16] bharat862004: why don't you use our package? [01:16] so i cannot install or update my existing verion of firefox in ubuntu 6.06... right ? [01:16] asac: bandwidth he said [01:17] bharat862004: not unless you use our repo or wait untill its backported [01:17] bharat862004: are you a brave guy ... or just want to have a stable environment ? ... otherwise you could try our dapper backport :) [01:17] e.g. try backports if you feel brave [01:17] asac: he thinks it will help his extension [01:17] ok i am ready to use the repository method also ... tell me ? [01:17] what kind of extension is that? [01:17] the extension is trash [01:18] bharat862004: be warned ... it might upgrade a lot applications for you [01:18] ok i'm not bothered about my extension now... just wanna update the firefox.... that's it :) [01:18] asac: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1672 [01:18] bharat862004: what version do you want? [01:18] latest version.... [01:19] so latest 1.5.0.x version is not latest for you? [01:19] hope that does not take to much time to update firefox :) [01:19] you want latest 2.0.0.x ? === gnomefreak cant remember if i built 2.0.0.3 or .4 for our repo === gnomefreak goes looks [01:19] bharat862004: if you don't have time better don't use our repos [01:19] asac: yes... i guess that suppose to be the latest ? isnt it ? [01:19] depends :) [01:19] asac: I HAVE TIME [01:20] 1.5.0.12 is latest 1.5 version [01:20] 2.0.0.4 is latest 2.0 version [01:20] 3.0 alpha5 is latest 3.0 version :) [01:20] plugin isn't 3.0 happy [01:20] asac: stop playing games now :) [01:20] ah its .3 === gnomefreak building .4 for your repo hoefully no issues using feistys source but we shall see [01:22] should work [01:22] bharat862004: if you add our repo, do an apt-get update [01:22] will find out this afternoon [01:22] then do a apt-get dist-upgrade [01:23] but DON'T confirm that you want to go ahead [01:23] um, dappers handling of control files is lesser than feistys. so no $source-version [01:23] show us what apt wants to do, so we can at least see if something obvious break [01:23] and other things like that [01:23] DarkMageZ: 2.0.0.3 i already backported :) [01:23] gnomefreak: yes ... right ... we needed to fix control [01:23] asac: yep [01:24] iirc we had to do that with .3 as well [01:24] it was the - and : change iirc [01:25] is there any news on if the ubuntu guys are going to start building their apps against libxul instead of firefox? so you'll beable to break firefox api/abi with cool updates without breaking their apps? [01:28] ok guys i give up... i am sticking to my default version of firefox.... :) [01:29] bharat862004, what was your problem with that plugin? i've been playing around with it for afew minutes. [01:29] nothing much :) === gnomefreak wouldnt call firefox failing to start nothing much [01:30] sometimes linux is screwed up... but still i like linux dont know y... :( [01:33] :-P [01:34] is their anything u would like to say before i leave O:-) [01:35] it's probably time for a clean install. careful with admin apps & commands as they can and will do damage if used incorrectly. [01:36] feisty has lots of bug fixes and cool new stuff like flash 9 [01:36] and firefox 2 :P [01:36] i recently installed ubuntu.... so its already clean :P [01:36] not concerned about firefox 2 :P [01:36] lol [01:37] asac: do you read planet ubuntu? [01:37] if firefox is crashing on startup, something is wrong. have you managed to remove that plugin? [01:37] mv /.moziila /.mozilla.bak [01:37] by changing the profile [01:37] isnt that the correct way ??????? [01:37] :P [01:38] that'll do [01:39] bot [01:39] ubotu [01:39] ubuntu [01:39] mozilla [01:39] bot isnt working ?? [01:39] um, ubotu serves different purposes here. [01:40] bug #123 [01:40] ok [01:40] Launchpad bug 123 in rosetta "There's no direct way to see the project info when translating it" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/123 [01:44] gnomefreak: no ... if there is important news, please let me know .) [01:44] something on mozembed but its just a work around [01:44] ill get you link [01:44] thanks [01:45] yw [01:46] not sure if it is same issue or not but here is the blog on it http://skunkyjay.wordpress.com/2007/06/10/mozilla-embeded-error-resolved/ [01:48] could also be this? https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137189 [01:48] Mozilla bug 137189 in Plug-ins "Windowless plug-in support for X (WMODE)" [Normal,Assigned] [01:56] gnomefreak: i posted a comment :) [01:56] k ill look in a bit === redmonkey [n=redmonke@p54A05E20.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [01:59] hello === cjwatson_ [n=cjwatson@82-69-40-219.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [02:00] hi [02:00] i cannot run thunderbird anymore. i recieve a segmentation fault as soon as i start it :( [02:00] i hate the use of the word resolved in his comment. [02:00] redmonkey: extensions/addons/themes installed? [02:00] only root is able to run it without crashing it [02:00] gnomefreak: nothing [02:01] i also tried to delete /home/myname/.mozilla-thunderbird completely. but it didnt help [02:01] asac: not under your name you didnt (atleast on his blog [02:01] redmonkey: try running it in safe mode [02:01] gnomefreak: ok, how? [02:02] thunderbird -safe-mode i think [02:03] Warning: unrecognized command line flag -save-mode [02:03] redmonkey: or mozilla-thunderbird -safe-mode [02:03] redmonkey: you have typo [02:03] oops sorry [02:03] didnt work. same error: [02:03] DOUBLE-CLICK: 300 --> -1 THRESHOLD: 8 --> -1 Segmentation fault (core dumped) [02:05] redmonkey: what version of ubuntu what version of tbird? [02:06] ubuntu 7.04 thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (from the repos) [02:07] redmonkey: can you file a bug report and attach the crash report in /var/crash so we can better find what is going on with it. did it work at all with that version? [02:08] asac: maybe wordpress needs a while to update [02:09] yes, it worked without any problems before [02:09] before the .12 update? [02:09] file a bug report.. uh-oh, i never did that before [02:09] or worked with .12 for a while than just stopped? [02:10] !bugs | redmonkey [02:10] redmonkey: If you find a bug in Ubuntu or any of its derivatives, please file a bug report at: http://bugs.ubuntu.com/ - Bugs in/wishes for the bots can be filed at http://launchpad.net/products/ubuntu-bots [02:10] it should prety much walk you through it. you will have to submit the bug before you can attach teh log file [02:11] it worked without any problems in the last version. then i couldnt start it anymore. a few days later i updated to .12 to check if the bug has been fixed, but it hasnt. [02:12] but why am i able to run it as root? [02:13] well the easy things that were asked didnt help. please file bug and attach the file, the file is gonna be needed. not sure maybe root bypasses your profile === gnomefreak dont run apps as root unless i have to its a bad habit to get into === gnomefreak is gonna need to go soon (im hoping to get dappers ffox started but not looking too good atm [02:16] ) [02:19] that is odd when version is (= 2:1.fire...$(Source-Version) but when it uses >= its (Source:Version) [02:20] maybe its just me that finds that weird [02:23] ok im out for a bit i got a few hours before i can start on it anyway [02:28] seems like that bug has already been reported: [02:28] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozilla-thunderbird/+bug/72332 [02:28] Launchpad bug 72332 in mozilla-thunderbird "thunderbird crashes on start" [Medium,Confirmed] [02:29] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozilla-thunderbird/+bug/70649 [02:29] Launchpad bug 70649 in mozilla-thunderbird "Thunderbird crash" [Medium,Needs info] [02:30] it describes it extactly [03:23] hmm, redmonkey attached his report to an existing bug, weird he should open a new one (easier for me)... retracing === DarkMageZ [n=richard@ppp167-203.lns4.syd6.internode.on.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === hjmf hates when a reporter attachs his crash report to an existing thread, more if that thread is old and is about to be closed soon :( !!! [04:15] bug 70649 [04:15] Launchpad bug 70649 in thunderbird "Thunderbird crashes after finishing the creation of an email account (dup-of: 115602)" [High,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/70649 [04:15] Launchpad bug 115602 in thunderbird "MASTER thunderbird crashed [@nsHTMLReflowState::CalcLineHeight] [@nsBlockReflowState] " [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/115602 [04:17] one hour for doing the OP's retraces on a edgy chroot trying to get a good one with such old report and the same again for the new one in feisty chroot damn! how easy would have been if redmonkey just have opened a new crash report === hjmf exits angry mode [04:18] :) [04:48] hjmf: we cannot care for everyone [04:49] just ignore that report [06:08] --enable-system-myspell \ thats a good thing :( [06:09] we really need a damn patch system for pre gutsy firefox [06:11] asac: do you remember what you changed to fix myspell errors during build? [06:15] trying something to fix this [06:21] hmm [06:21] i don't remember ... are you updating dapper backport? [06:21] gnomefreak: ^^? [06:21] using feisty source to do it but yes [06:22] i just installed libmyspell-dev to see if that was problem [06:29] gnomefreak: do you still have the last package? [06:30] gnomefreak: better use the diff.gz from that and apply the patch on top of an extracted fresh upstream tarball [06:32] gnomefreak: actuallyl i think that i should update it ... there have been some patches applied upstream, which now need some work to make our patches work seemlessly with it [06:35] k go for it. i have it building but im getting ready to walk out the door for a while [06:36] not today :) [06:36] no its not important [06:40] @now new york [06:40] Current time in America/New_York: June 12 2007, 12:40:50 - Next meeting: Edubuntu in 19 hours 19 minutes [06:41] @now [06:41] Current time in Etc/UTC: June 12 2007, 16:41:13 - Next meeting: Edubuntu in 19 hours 18 minutes [06:41] @now eastern [06:41] Current time in Canada/Eastern: June 12 2007, 12:41:39 - Next meeting: Edubuntu in 19 hours 18 minutes [06:41] @now america/+eastern [06:41] @now america/eastern === JenFraggle [n=jen@host86-134-114-43.range86-134.btcentralplus.com] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [07:20] ok ... i am out for today .... this took my energy for today: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+source/gnash/0.8.0~cvs20070611.1016-1ubuntu1 [07:26] looks complicated [07:26] I'm looking at the MozillaTeam wiki for newbie friendliness [07:28] JenFraggle: yeah ... go ahead :) [07:31] JenFraggle: I'm thinking of beefing up https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/Proceduces [07:32] yes Precedures.. [07:32] Procedures. [07:32] i'm not on today.. [07:33] it's a bit small [07:33] i'm off out now but will mark it as another page to look at. will make some notes and get back to you === gnomefreak hates people === salty-horse [n=ori@pdpc/supporter/active/salty-horse] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [08:04] asac: it might build [08:05] asac: salty-horse has a question about a bug iirc i just came home to pick up a phone number and im out again :) [08:07] hi. about https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/82168 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/113683 -- in retrospect, I think the real problem is that mozilla products don't use the "east-west / north-south resize" mouse cursors - I can't find a screenshot tool that captures the cursor. if you still need a screenshot, can you assist me with this? [08:07] Launchpad bug 82168 in firefox "autoscroll shows the "resize up" cursor" [Medium,Confirmed] [08:11] salty-horse: i am out ... can you be here tomorrow? ... at best a few hours earlier? [08:11] actuallyl i am in conference now, but then out directly [08:12] asac, this is my "home" time. i'll try :) - or you could just comment on the bugs :) [08:12] i don't want to disturb [08:31] bug 113683 [08:31] Launchpad bug 113683 in firefox "hovering over splitter widget sets incorrect cursor (dup-of: 82168)" [Undecided,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/113683 [08:31] Launchpad bug 82168 in firefox "autoscroll shows the "resize up" cursor" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/82168 [08:31] bug 82168 [08:31] ah ... now i remember [08:31] it should definitly be pushed upstream [08:31] i mean its probably not ubuntu specific [08:31] salty-horse: ^^^ [08:31] salty-horse: i will try to verify your horizontal/vertical scrollbar rule [08:32] salty-horse: did you ever find a case where this rule doesn't hold? [08:33] salty-horse: looks like you found the right rule [08:33] salty-horse: wierd ... thanks [08:34] yes. see the bugs. in the bookmark/history sidebar resize (vertical), in thunderbird's email list/preview seperator, in the middle-click scroll wheel (when the page only has one of the scrollbars - otherwise it's the correct hand icon [08:34] ) [08:36] i'm using gnome - maybe it's worth checking in kde [08:37] Admiral_Chicago: can you test bug 82168 ? [08:37] Launchpad bug 82168 in firefox "autoscroll shows the "resize up" cursor" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/82168 [08:37] Admiral_Chicago: on kde :) [08:39] salty-horse: ok thanks for following up. i will look at the duplicate tomorrow [08:39] i am now out [08:39] Admiral_Chicago, it's easier to check with the sidebar resizer. [08:39] thanks asac [08:53] looking... [08:56] i need a page to upload too and can't remember the image site.. [08:57] imageshack.us works.. [08:57] asac: http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/7939/reproduceddo4.png [08:57] i'm missing an app to screenshot the cursor, not to host (I can attach the image to the launchpad bug) [08:57] yea i can reproduce it [08:58] hmm [09:01] should one bug be DUPLICATEd? [09:02] what do ou mean [09:03] i reported two bugs on the subject: 82168 and 113683 [09:03] yea the screen shot thing didn't get teh cursor [09:03] mark the older one as a dup of the younger one [09:03] err the other way around... [09:04] btw, how does your screenshot show the bug? :) [09:04] oh, you answered :) [09:06] well i'll try in a vm, that may work [09:06] i think it has to do with the way the mouse is drawn [09:42] ok im back for a while i think [09:46] asac: did i miss something? Accepted iceape 1.1.1+u2-0ubuntu1 (source) (Ubuntu Installer) thought pitti rejected it or did you upload again? === JenFraggle [n=jen@host86-134-114-43.range86-134.btcentralplus.com] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === salty-horse [n=ori@pdpc/supporter/active/salty-horse] has left #ubuntu-mozillateam ["Leaving"] [10:54] @schedule new_york [10:54] Schedule for America/New_York: 13 Jun 08:00: Edubuntu | 14 Jun 12:00: Ubuntu Development Team | 16 Jun 13:00: Xubuntu Developers | 19 Jun 15:00: Technical Board | 20 Jun 16:00: Edubuntu | 21 Jun 14:00: Mozilla Team [10:54] ok our meeting is set up [10:57] cool [10:59] great === Admiral_Chicago finished editing one wiki, starts on bug procedures nwo [11:00] if anyone has agenda items please add them. [11:03] Admiral_Chicago: did you just change your status on jabber? [11:03] i just got a little bit of music cant figure out what it was from [11:04] gnomefreak: yea it was me, i launced gaim. [11:04] ah ok ty [11:04] playing with getting psi to work [11:04] JenFraggle: if you feel adventureous, dansguardian could use a clue file [11:05] JenFraggle: http://pastebin.ca/562611 === cjwatson_ [n=cjwatson@82-69-40-219.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [11:32] gnomefreak: i fixed and uploaded iceape [11:32] and pushed pitti to let it in :) [11:32] i will push the new remove.nonfree script [11:33] once binaries are NEWed as well we need to push 1.1.3 [11:33] or whatever the latest is === cjwatson [n=cjwatson@82-69-40-219.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [11:38] 1.1.2 [11:38] might want to build it before you upload it ;) [11:39] gnomefreak: oh i think i messed it up :) [11:39] either its debian version ... or the new tarball still contains the binaries :) [11:39] 1.1.1? [11:39] yes 1.1.1 is what we have atm [11:40] we should definitly prepare 1.1.2 :) [11:40] and upload as soon as 1.1.1 gets binary NEWed [11:40] let me fix this :) [11:40] that way its never noticed lol [11:41] 1.1.2 isnt gonna be easy although most of it is removing patches. let me know if my patch applies ok please [11:42] which patch? [11:42] ah your menu patch? hope its actually in atm [11:42] 82_prefs_ubuntu.dpatch [11:42] let me see as soon as tree was cleaned here [11:42] its in my branch [11:42] ah ok [11:42] think we have 3 iceeape branches [11:42] let me first sync here [11:45] ok i updated mozilla team debian.1.1.x branch [11:46] wasent debian.1.1.x already updated with mikes changes [11:46] that should be wasnt [11:51] gnomefreak: can you look what you have as 1.1.1-3 in changelog [11:52] e.g. what text [11:52] looking [11:53] what one [11:53] there are 9 releases of that [11:53] give or take 1 [11:53] ill pastebin all [11:54] wow [11:54] i already found it [11:54] i guess we combined them [11:54] apparently mike wiped 1.1.1-3 [11:54] changlog entry [11:54] http://gnomefreak.pastebin.ca/562743 [11:54] by bumping to 1.1.2-1 [11:54] and adding more content to it [11:54] e.g. see [11:54] yes [11:55] i saw that [11:55] http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-mozilla/iceape/trunk/debian/changelog?op=log&rev=0&sc=1&isdir=0 [11:55] he started at 1.1.1-3 than moved to -2 thats why we got all screed up [11:55] screwed up [11:55] 39902 vs. 39917 [11:55] i think 1.1.1-3 was never released to debian [11:55] so its valid [11:55] ok [11:56] we got it from experimental than they killed it and released 1.1.1-2 to sid iirc [11:58] I've copied the states and tags wiki pages and am working my way through checking them. seems funny being written in american rather than english [11:59] this is really messy [11:59] i mean fixing this changelog mess [11:59] his or ours? [12:00] this changelog merge mess i mean [12:00] problem is i pushed changes to ubuntu ... and to debian [12:00] under different version numbers [12:00] ah [12:00] .e.g using different versions ... so shall i duplicate changelog entries now? [12:00] i think yes, since the changes were not really applied :/ [12:01] wait our changes you pushed to debian were never applied? [12:02] yeah i think i had a bad day yesterday :) [12:02] i pushed a bad version to debian svn ;) [12:02] maybe i should stop being online for a while [12:02] as mike will definitly laugh at me ;) [12:03] it happens to all of us [12:03] hehe was just kidding [12:03] http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-mozilla/iceape/trunk/debian/changelog?op=file&rev=39926&sc=1 [12:03] look [12:03] i used -2 [12:03] though it should have been - [12:03] -1 [12:03] e.g. the version [12:04] why -1 if mikes is -2 [12:04] yeah look [12:04] or is it because of version name [12:04] its because i bumped upstream version [12:05] ah ok [12:05] because that change means it needs a new orig [12:11] ok mozillateam branch for ubuntu-1.1.x is now up to date [12:12] you can merge changes to your branch :) [12:13] ok will try [12:15] gnomefreak: what is the revision i should merge to mozillateam branch? [12:15] from yours? [12:15] e.g. to get the prefs? [12:15] patch? [12:15] let me look [12:16] i would like to prepare 1.1.2.dfsg1-2ubuntu1 so i can directly push it tomorrow [12:16] 79for patch 80 for changelog [12:16] i have comflicts i need to resolve [12:17] brb [12:18] i think most conflicts you can just resolve by copying the .OTHER file to the real name [12:18] which conflicts do you have? [12:19] changelog [12:19] i havent looked at it yet [12:25] only changelog? [12:26] yeah i think that was my screw up [12:26] im merging now lets see what happens [12:27] it seems the changelog entry i pushed to my branch conflicts with yours you just pushed how do i remover a pushed entry in my branch [12:27] gnomefreak: look in changelog