[12:28] <gnomefreak> ok im logged into jabber acocunt i think (dont know how to use it though) one of these days ill figure it out
[12:28] <Admiral_Chicago> gnomefreak: what is your sn
[12:29] <gnomefreak> gnomefreak i think
[12:29] <gnomefreak> it just says localhost (0/0)
[12:30] <asac> gnomefreak: you could just use gnomefreak@jabber.ccc.de :)
[12:30] <Admiral_Chicago> i'm not seeing you...looking
[12:30] <gnomefreak> its says im available
[12:30] <Admiral_Chicago> i'll look again
[12:30] <asac> gnomefreak: what domain did you choose?
[12:30] <gnomefreak> localhost i think
[12:30] <Admiral_Chicago> JABBER - Error: Jabber Error: No such user: "gnomefreak@jabber.ccc.de
[12:30] <gnomefreak> try gnomefreak@localhost
[12:31] <gnomefreak> gnomefreak@localhost
[12:31] <gnomefreak> thats it afaict
[12:31] <gnomefreak> atleast from the accounts area
[12:32] <Admiral_Chicago> tryingto authorize...
[12:32] <asac> gnomefreak: you did wrong
[12:32] <asac> gnomefreak: you have to create an account at a jabber provider
[12:32] <asac> localhost won't bring you anywhere
[12:33] <Admiral_Chicago> asac: Admiral_Chicago@jabber.com if you want to add me
[12:33] <Admiral_Chicago> you it says 404...
[12:33] <asac> Admiral_Chicago: done
[12:33] <asac> gnomefreak: localhost is none-sense
[12:34] <asac> choose a provider
[12:34] <Admiral_Chicago> great, message me so i can authenticate.
[12:34] <asac> gnomefreak: http://www.jabber.org/user/publicservers.shtml
[12:34] <asac> Admiral_Chicago: authenticate? GPG you mean?
[12:34] <asac> Admiral_Chicago: you should have received and authorization request already
[12:35] <Admiral_Chicago> sure...
[12:35] <Admiral_Chicago> i havent got anything
[12:35] <asac> hmmm
[12:35] <Admiral_Chicago> bbbiab
[12:35] <asac> i get service-unavailable atm
[12:35] <asac> maybe a temporarily peering problem
[12:35] <asac> my nick is asac@jabber.ccc.de
[12:36] <asac> Admiral_Chicago: yeah ... i have problems with other jabber.com nicks in my list lately as well
[12:38] <gnomefreak> ok working on it
[12:39] <asac> Admiral_Chicago: i added you to my jabber.org account as well now
[12:40] <asac> hmm maybe jabber.com has problems? I still get wierd errors even though I am going through jabber.org
[12:40] <asac> Admiral_Chicago: you received anything?
[12:40] <asac> try to add asac@jabber.org as well
[12:42] <Admiral_Chicago> asac: brb
[12:46] <gnomefreak> ok i think im here
[12:47] <gnomefreak> gnomefreak@jabber.org
[12:49] <gnomefreak> how the hell do i read it
[12:51] <asac> gnomefreak: it worked
[12:51] <gnomefreak> yep :)
[12:51] <Admiral_Chicago> great...pidgin crashes on me
[12:51] <gnomefreak> i had to remove ~/.gajim
[12:51] <asac> gnomefreak: can you please add asac@jabber.ccc.de as well?
[12:51] <Admiral_Chicago> oh well. am i online though?
[12:51] <asac> gnomefreak: that is my main account
[12:51] <gnomefreak> asac: yes
[12:52] <gnomefreak> ok i sent request
[12:52] <gnomefreak> it sent even
[12:53] <asac> ok i see gnomefreak online ... but not Admiral_Chicago
[12:53] <gnomefreak> he logged off
[12:53] <gnomefreak> should i add gpg key info to this?
[12:53] <asac> ah ok
[12:53] <asac> gnomefreak: if you want :)
[12:54] <asac> I use the "Mobile Key"
[12:54] <asac> you should be able to find it by asac@jabber.ccc.de
[12:54] <Admiral_Chicago> no i'm on...
[12:54] <gnomefreak> did he log back in
[12:54] <Admiral_Chicago> i'm on but i'm not sure...
[12:54] <Admiral_Chicago> something is messed up because it makes it look like everyone is offline
[12:55] <gnomefreak> you have away message up when i logged off
[12:55] <gnomefreak> it has a 2 next to youa d
[12:55] <gnomefreak> Admiral_Chicago:
[12:57] <asac> my gpg key is DCF833D4
[12:57] <asac> pub   1024D/DCF833D4 2005-01-27 [expires: 2010-01-26] 
[12:57] <asac> uid                  Alexander Sack - Mobile Key - Insecure <asac@jabber.ccc.de>
[12:57] <asac> uid                  Alexander Sack (Mobile Key - Insecure) <alex@jwsdot.com>
[12:57] <asac> uid                  Alexander Sack (Mobile Key - Insecure) <asac@jabber.org>
[12:57] <asac> uid                  Alexander Sack (Mobile Key - Insecure) <asac@jwsdot.com>
[12:57] <asac> uid                  Alexander Sack (Mobile Key - Insecure) <asack@c1-fse.de>
[12:58] <asac> uid                  Alexander Sack (Mobile Key - Insecure) <asac@jabber.ccc.de>
[12:58] <Admiral_Chicago> why do i have to keep requesting authorization from people?
[12:58] <Admiral_Chicago> !jabber
[12:58] <ubotu> jabber is a free and open source instant messaging protocol, unlike MSN and AIM. Supporting clients on Linux: Kopete (KDE), Gaim (GNOME). For more info see http://www.jabber.org
[12:58] <asac> Admiral_Chicago: you usually don't need to
[12:58] <asac> ... just once
[12:59] <gnomefreak> i had to do it 2 for asac and 1 time for Admiral_Chicago
[12:59] <Admiral_Chicago> i think its pidgin.
[12:59] <asac> its interesting that the most enhanced clients 'psi' and 'gajim' are not listed there
[12:59] <asac> gnomefreak: you did it twice for me because you added jabber.org  + jabber.ccc.de :)
[12:59] <Admiral_Chicago> might be a bug.
[01:00] <gnomefreak> oh ok
[01:00] <asac> yes gaim is not really enhanced on jabber
[01:00] <asac> its good if you use other protocols though
[01:00] <asac> if you use kde you would want to use PSI which uses Qt
[01:00] <asac> and implements almost all jabber features
[01:00] <asac> for gnome its gajim
[01:00] <Admiral_Chicago> i'll try that...
[01:01] <gnomefreak> this reminds me alot like gaim
[01:01] <asac> both ship gpg support out of the box
[01:01] <asac> gnomefreak: yeah i think thats the intention of the name gajim :)
[01:01] <gnomefreak> :) good point
[01:02] <asac> interstingly, gaim is now pidgin ... bug gajim stays :)
[01:02] <gnomefreak> yep
[01:04] <Admiral_Chicago> !gpg
[01:04] <ubotu> gpg is the GNU Privacy Guard.  See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/GnuPrivacyGuardHowto and class #8 on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ClassroomTranscripts
[01:04] <Admiral_Chicago> i need to regenerate a key
[01:04] <asac> http://gnomefreak.pastebin.ca/559905
[01:05] <asac> i updated the text a bit
[01:05] <asac> but please lets go over it again tomorrow
[01:05] <asac> i just didn't want to loose my changes
[01:06] <asac> gnomefreak: ^^^
[01:07] <gnomefreak> k
[01:09] <gnomefreak> am i away on jabbas?
[01:12] <gnomefreak> jabber even
[01:13] <gnomefreak> asac: ok saved your settings locally and we can review it tomorrow or later this week i have a few appointments tomorrow
[01:15] <asac> gnomefreak: yeah you are away :)
[01:15] <gnomefreak> yeah i fixed it
[01:15] <asac> gajim has some problems recently to detect your activity from X session
[01:16] <asac> gnomefreak: Admiral_Chicago do java applets work for you in gutsy?
[01:16] <gnomefreak> asac: that java bug from this morning?
[01:17] <asac> no
[01:17] <asac> i mean in general?
[01:17] <gnomefreak> i think so
[01:17] <asac> does java plugin work for you at all
[01:17] <asac> can you verify that please
[01:17] <gnomefreak> java.com works fine here
[01:17] <asac> its most important that it works
[01:18] <asac> gnomefreak: you can play games?
[01:18] <gnomefreak> give me a few and ill try pogo
[01:21] <gnomefreak> waiting for it to load
[01:22] <gnomefreak> mother
[01:22] <gnomefreak> telling me i dont have plugin to play
[01:23] <gnomefreak> iirc this works fine in iceape
[01:23] <gnomefreak> thats what i was using to play
[01:23] <gnomefreak> did this start with plugin finder update?
[01:24] <gnomefreak> same issue from the bug this morning
[01:24] <gnomefreak> still hasnt tested java5 that will have to wait till tomorrow
[01:25] <gnomefreak> ok im gone for a while, i might peep in later but i doubt it
[01:25] <Admiral_Chicago> asac: i'm not on Gutdsy yet. i need a stable maching atm
[01:25] <gnomefreak> Admiral_Chicago: does it work on feisty?
[01:26] <Admiral_Chicago> never had a problem with java applets, i'm using java 6
[01:26] <gnomefreak> maybe check if it works with java5 and java6
[01:26] <gnomefreak> or jusdt java6
[01:26] <Admiral_Chicago> someone hava a link?
[01:27] <gnomefreak> yeah its on that damn bug
[01:27] <gnomefreak> dont remember it though
[01:27] <gnomefreak> i just tried pogo.com but you need account
[01:27] <gnomefreak> ok really gone now
[01:32] <asac> feisty is not what bothers me
[01:32] <asac> its just gutsy
[01:32] <asac> Admiral_Chicago: you should be able to test in a gutsy chroot though.
[01:33] <asac> but if you don't want to setup one ... no problem as well.
[01:33] <asac> ok i am off
[01:33] <asac> its late
[01:33] <asac> night
[01:43] <Admiral_Chicago> i'll have to look at chroors.
[01:43] <Admiral_Chicago> i've never played with chroots
[09:46] <gnomefreak> bug 119955
[09:46] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 119955 in firefox "Firefox responds so slowly " [Low,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/119955
[09:59] <gnomefreak> asac: iirc you had wanted to change the way iceape builds, while your looking at the conflicts are you gonna change it or are you gonna wait a while?
[09:59] <asac> i wanted to change the way iceape builds
[09:59] <asac> ??
[09:59] <asac> please refresh my memory
[10:02] <gnomefreak> you had me grab diffs and post them on my site, you never explained what you were gonna change but you had said you wanted to change it
[10:03] <gnomefreak> here are the diffs incase you forgot and maybe they will refresh your memory http://gnomefreak.youmortals.com/
[10:05] <asac> gnomefreak: i am sorry ... i am completely lost
[10:06] <asac> maybe we can dig some irc log context, so I can remember?
[10:06] <asac> when was tah?
[10:08] <gnomefreak> 2007-04-24
[10:08] <gnomefreak> we talked about it that day.
[10:09] <gnomefreak> !logs
[10:09] <ubotu> Channel logs can be found at http://people.ubuntu.com/~fabbione/irclogs
[10:10] <Admiral_Chicago> i think the movement of tabbed windows is greatly improved in Fx trunk
[10:10] <Admiral_Chicago> much easier to use than a little arrow for all the information
[10:15] <gnomefreak> it looks like ubuntulog was offline that day for most of it so there are no longs for it there :(
[10:15] <gnomefreak> i believe it was early to mid afternoon my time EST
[10:15] <gnomefreak> its only 4:15 :(
[10:17] <Admiral_Chicago> ah no i don't have them...sorry
[10:17] <Admiral_Chicago> there was a two week period when i used konversation, didn't log then
[10:17] <Admiral_Chicago> switched back to irssi with logging...
[10:23] <asac> Admiral_Chicago: so you are testing trunk ... nice!
[10:23] <asac> if you have any issues, bug reports are welcome
[10:23] <asac> in fact upstream wants us to provide feedback
[10:26] <gnomefreak> Admiral_Chicago: trunk update in repo btw
[10:26] <Admiral_Chicago> bug 118586 is a feature afaik
[10:26] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 118586 in firefox "Firefox halts keyboard scrolling after embedded Flash video" [Undecided,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/118586
[10:26] <Admiral_Chicago> flash needs to steal the focus for stuff like games etc.
[10:26] <gnomefreak> that bug was in my inbox this mornig
[10:27] <Admiral_Chicago> i've had no issues so far asac, some UI feedback really
[10:27] <Admiral_Chicago> but i can get to that in the morning....
[10:27] <asac> actually i don't have that issue with gnash
[10:27] <gnomefreak> is there a cnertal place for feedback or do we report ubgs
[10:27] <asac> so i assume its a nonfree-flashplayer issue
[10:27] <asac> (though I couldn't verify that its really like the bug report claims)
[10:28] <asac> gnomefreak: we report bugs
[10:28] <asac> gnomefreak: we have to push firefox-preview
[10:28] <asac> so we have a package where we can file bugs in lp against
[10:28] <Admiral_Chicago> basically, when you enter the area of the embedded flash video (could be a sound clip, video game, video)
[10:28] <gnomefreak> asac: i have firefox-trunk built for gutsy
[10:28] <Admiral_Chicago> it takes focus i case its like a video game that needs teh arrow keys for example
[10:28] <gnomefreak> by mistake but its built
[10:29] <Admiral_Chicago> i'm thinking the way flash is interpreted is one element that can't diffirentiate between the types of content
[10:29] <asac> gnomefreak: did you need any modifications?
[10:29] <asac> .e.g for latest trunk?
[10:29] <gnomefreak> asac: nope
[10:29] <asac> or just whats in current bzr
[10:29] <asac> good
[10:30] <gnomefreak> current bzr but built for 20070608
[10:30] <asac> i will create a 'preview' branch then ... which we can use to prepare the -preview package
[10:30] <Admiral_Chicago> this is likely due to the way flash player reads embbeded content...but not our issue
[10:30] <asac> Admiral_Chicago: maybe
[10:31] <Admiral_Chicago> i can say +1 that this is a feature
[10:31] <asac> however ... taking the focus without a click (or a mouse-wheel spin) is not nice, right?
[10:31] <gnomefreak> asac: renaming the packge will prevent upgrade to succeed
[10:31] <Admiral_Chicago> occurs in Windows XP + firefox
[10:31] <Admiral_Chicago> not sure if it happens in Vista + IE, nor do I care...
[10:31] <asac> gnomefreak: its ment to be a separate package ... e.g. people should not automatically upgrade from -trunk to -preview
[10:31] <gnomefreak> k
[10:32] <asac> as people that use -trunk want the latest and get regular CVS updates
[10:32] <Admiral_Chicago> asac: from other OSs I can this is expected behavior from flash player.
[10:32] <asac> Admiral_Chicago: feel free to explain that in bug and reject it
[10:32] <Admiral_Chicago> will do
[10:32] <asac> tell them about game :)
[10:33] <asac> if the reporter insists then it should be reassigned to flashplayer-nonfree
[10:38] <Admiral_Chicago> done
[10:38] <Admiral_Chicago> and let them reject it...
[10:39] <gnomefreak> is there anyone actively working on flsah bugs?
[10:39] <gnomefreak> i havent seen any real actions on them in a long time
[10:40] <asac> gnomefreak: me :)
[10:40] <gnomefreak> ah :)
[10:40] <asac> actually i have to touch the package soon
[10:40] <Admiral_Chicago> freddy@omg-gnus:~$ bugnumbers -p flashplugin-nonfree
[10:40] <asac> like in free-flash spec
[10:40] <Admiral_Chicago> what the heck...
[10:40] <Admiral_Chicago> bug 50839
[10:40] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 50839 in flashplugin-nonfree "If the mouse is hold on a flash animation keyboard and mouse scrolling stop to work" [Low,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/50839
[10:40] <Admiral_Chicago> didn't i just reject a similar bug...
[10:41] <Admiral_Chicago> looking now..
[10:42] <Admiral_Chicago> odd that they have upsteam bug tracker
[10:43] <Admiral_Chicago> would bug 49613 be a candidate for high priority...
[10:43] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 49613 in flashplugin-nonfree "flash plugin always rendered on top of html" [Medium,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/49613
[10:43] <Admiral_Chicago> i'm going to bed
[10:45] <asac> Admiral_Chicago: night
[11:10] <gnomefreak> night Admiral_Chicago
[11:11] <hjmf> night Admiral_Chicago, morning the rest of you :)
[11:12] <DarkMageZ> with ubuntu feisty. i've got libnspr-dev & libnspr4 & firefox-dev installed but diamond-x plugin runs into a compiler issue with nspr http://pastebin.ca/560994
[11:13] <gnomefreak> morning hjmf
[11:23] <gnomefreak> asac: trunk is alpha6
[11:23] <gnomefreak> atleast that is what it says in help>about
[11:26] <asac> yes ... thats next release
[11:29] <gnomefreak> next release will be alpha7 or beta or rc not sure how they do version names like that
[11:29] <gnomefreak> 6 released already
[11:38] <asac> 6 released?
[11:38] <asac> is it on ftp servers?
[11:38] <asac> afaik we have code freeze today for alpha6
[11:38] <asac> gnomefreak: ^^ ?
[11:41] <gnomefreak> from what help>about says its alpha 6
[11:42] <gnomefreak> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9a6pre) Gecko/20070611 GranParadiso/3.0a6pre
[11:42] <gnomefreak> maybe thats pre alpha?
[11:44] <gnomefreak> the release notes page gives a 404 so i was unable to see what has been done
[11:56] <asac> yeah ... they bump version info before release
[11:56] <asac> anyway its not alpha6 ... since its not released yet
[11:56] <asac> there might still be changes for blockers landing
[11:57] <gnomefreak> oh ok
[12:04] <asac> no its ok
[12:04] <asac> but thats the way it works
[12:04] <asac> the bump version before they freeze
[12:04] <gnomefreak> ah ok
[12:04] <asac> and wait if any serious issues pop up before they release
[12:05] <gnomefreak> is there a way to tell without going to search mozilla site if its been released or if its pre-release
[12:33] <asac> blog
[12:33] <asac> probably mozillazine news feed should be enough if you don't want to subscribe to mozilla planet
[12:34] <gnomefreak> ah ok
[12:37] <gnomefreak> asac: you may need to hang around for a little it
[12:37] <gnomefreak> bit
[12:37] <gnomefreak> this issue may be really bad
[12:37] <gnomefreak> hi bharat862004
[12:37] <bharat862004> hi
[12:38] <gnomefreak> bharat862004: try a new profile see if it starts than. is this in feisty?
[12:38] <bharat862004> ok let me tell u the whole problem
[12:38] <gnomefreak> good idea
[12:42] <bharat862004> i'm using ubuntu 6.06 version... and i can recover back by firefox by replacing with new profile by using this command " mv /.mozilla /.mozilla.bak " ..... and when i install this add-on ("IMAGELIKEOPERA") and after changing the settings of this add-on when i restart my firefox i get this error " error launching browser window:no XBL binding for browser "... i'm using this add-on so images won
[12:42] <bharat862004> won't be loaded when i visit adult site.... this is the whole problem now.
[12:43] <bharat862004> i have already downlaod the latest version of firefox and its in firefox.tar.gz format.
[12:44] <bharat862004> gnomefreak: r u their ???
[12:44] <gnomefreak> have you tried flash and or java to view the images. that extension isnt supported by ubuntu so you would have to file a bug with the maker of that extension. in dapper 1.5.0.12 shouldnt have this issue
[12:44] <gnomefreak> bharat862004: yes im typing
[12:44] <bharat862004> u mean i cannot use that add-on ??
[12:45] <gnomefreak> bharat862004: as for the extension you wont beablet o use it with firefox sinces it stopping it from working.
[12:45] <bharat862004> on my ubuntu 6.06
[12:45] <bharat862004> gnomefreak: do u have any alternative ?
[12:46] <bharat862004> gnomefreak: what if i install the latest version of firefox and then try to use the add-on.... that should work i guess ?
[12:46] <gnomefreak> bharat862004: yes its conflicting with something firefox uses. i have never heard of it and im fairly sure you didnt find it at mozilla.com/org so you would have to talk to the extensions writer/maintainer for a fix for that. give me a site you cant view images on and i should beablet o tell you what you need, most of time java or flash work fine
[12:46] <gnomefreak> bharat862004: no
[12:47] <gnomefreak> bharat862004: the extension is the issue not the version of firefox
[12:47] <bharat862004> gnomefreak: i found that add-on on mozilla.com/org site dude
[12:47] <gnomefreak> bharat862004: can i have link please
[12:47] <bharat862004> ok
[12:47] <gnomefreak> asac: you have link to planet mozilla
[12:48] <asac> http://planet.mozilla.org/
[12:48] <gnomefreak> ty :)
[12:48] <gnomefreak> asac: have you heard of the above extension?
[12:49] <bharat862004> ok this is the add-on i am talking about link " https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1672 "
[12:49] <gnomefreak> brb looking
[12:49] <bharat862004> ok
[12:51] <gnomefreak> bharat862004: its the same extension version for all of 2.0.0.* releases as well as 1.5.* releases im willing to bet it wont work on 2.0 either.
[12:51] <bharat862004> gnomefreak: holy $hit
[12:51] <bharat862004> i need that badly
[12:51] <gnomefreak> you need to contact the owner of the extension to help you fix it
[12:52] <bharat862004> gnomefreak: i have one doubt do u work for mozilla ????????
[12:52] <gnomefreak> bharat862004: we cant support non ubuntu packaged extensions as there are so damn many and alot fo them are written badly or nonfree, ect...
[12:52] <gnomefreak> bharat862004: no we are ubuntu-mozilla
[12:53] <gnomefreak> bharat862004: mozilla wont support that one either
[12:53] <bharat862004> gnomefreak: so u get paid for it right ???
[12:53] <gnomefreak> you need to contact the owner of it
[12:53] <gnomefreak> bharat862004: no
[12:53] <bharat862004> ok now i hav other problem
[12:53] <gnomefreak> want someone that gets paid for it to repeat what i said?
[12:55] <bharat862004> i have downlaoded firefox.tar.gz file coz i cannot download firefox every time separately from repositories.... as i have limited bandwidth usage.... so how do i install from firefox.tar.gz file.... i need to update my firefox
[12:55] <gnomefreak> !firefox
[12:55] <ubotu> firefox is the default web-browser on Ubuntu. To install the latest version, see https://help.ubuntu.com/community/FirefoxNewVersion Installing plugins: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FirefoxPlugins
[12:55] <gnomefreak> go to the firefoxnewversion
[12:55] <gnomefreak> link
[12:56] <bharat862004> i already have downloaded the file its in *.tar.gz format
[12:56] <gnomefreak> bharat862004: read the link it gives you step by step instructions on how to do it (or you can unpack tar cd into new dir and run ./firefox
[12:56] <gnomefreak> bharat862004: the link is pretty much copy and paste
[12:58] <bharat862004> the command ./firefox is not working dude
[12:59] <bharat862004> gnomefreak: u their ??
[12:59] <gnomefreak> than your not cd'ed into the new dir after unpacking it. hint easy way use my repo
[01:00] <gnomefreak> bharat862004: i have 2.0 backported to dapper in my repo so when EOS comes for 1.5 branch we can backport itto backport repos
[01:00] <bharat862004> u dont understand my problem.... i cannot do that everything... i have limited bandwidht usage re
[01:01] <gnomefreak> bharat862004: downloading the tar takes more bacnwidth. but you get the tar unpack it cd into new dir and run ./firefox it will work as i do it here every day
[01:02] <bharat862004> ok tell me how to go about from the beginning i have the firefox.tar.gz.... next ???
[01:02] <gnomefreak> ***MEMORY-WARNING***: firefox-bin[27194] : GSlice: g_thread_init() must be called before all other GLib functions; memory corruption due to late invocation of g_thread_init() has been detected; this program is likely to crash, leak or unexpectedly abort soon...
[01:02] <gnomefreak> might get that but it still runs
[01:03] <bharat862004> ok thanks anyways i will go now :)
[01:03] <gnomefreak> bharat862004: unpack the tarball tar -zvxf firefox....tar.gz replace firefox.... with name
[01:03] <bharat862004> ok tell me
[01:03] <gnomefreak> than cd firefox
[01:03] <gnomefreak> if that is name of dir.
[01:03] <bharat862004> ok next ?
[01:03] <gnomefreak> than ./firefox
[01:04] <bharat862004> where should i run that command "./firefox ?
[01:04] <gnomefreak> gnomefreak@GutsyGibbon:~/upstream_ffox/firefox$ ./firefox
[01:04] <gnomefreak> your dirs will be different or might be
[01:05] <gnomefreak> since i made upstream_ffox dir to keep ~/ clean
[01:05] <gnomefreak> once you unpack it you will see a dir named firefox
[01:05] <gnomefreak> cd firefox
[01:05] <gnomefreak> than ./firefox
[01:05] <bharat862004> ok
[01:05] <gnomefreak> bharat862004: make sure all firefoxs are closed first
[01:05] <bharat862004> ko
[01:06] <bharat862004> ok updated.... but got hell lot of warning and error's in the terminal.... $hit
[01:07] <bharat862004> trying my luck with the add-on now... wait
[01:07] <gnomefreak> bharat862004: its not updated its just running
[01:07] <gnomefreak> bharat862004: you would need to follow the instructions on the link i gave above to use extension
[01:08] <gnomefreak> or add it to upstream build that you are running but thats harder than it sounds
[01:08] <bharat862004> what ??? u mean its not installed... its just running from the firefox folder.... ???????
[01:08] <gnomefreak> bharat862004: yes
[01:09] <bharat862004> oh no
[01:09] <gnomefreak> bharat862004: you HAVE to follow the instructions on the link i gave you to install it
[01:09] <bharat862004> ok tell me what 2 do now... i am listening to u
[01:09] <gnomefreak> bharat862004: READ the link please
[01:10] <bharat862004> ok reading
[01:10] <gnomefreak> asac: did you get sunbird built ok?
[01:10] <gnomefreak> im catching up on the feeds and looks like there will be a rc2
[01:12] <gnomefreak> oh that cant be good. seamonkey branding is no longer free   << as in firefox or tbirds
[01:15] <asac> gnomefreak: yeah :)
[01:15] <bharat862004> gnomefreak: thats a pretty long procedure they have mentioned just to update or install the latest version of firefox... :(
[01:15] <asac> gnomefreak: i remember exactly how the seamonkey council swear that it will stay free
[01:16] <asac> i said ' i don't believe you, we are going iceape'
[01:16] <gnomefreak> bharat862004: its not suppported by ubuntu so it wont be too easy
[01:16] <asac> they said: trust me
[01:16] <asac> i said: like we trust your previously firefox branding policy? no go!
[01:16] <gnomefreak> i thought they were keeping it free too
[01:16] <gnomefreak> this blows chunks
[01:16] <asac> bharat862004: why don't you use our package?
[01:16] <bharat862004> so i cannot install or update my existing verion of firefox in ubuntu 6.06... right ?
[01:16] <gnomefreak> asac: bandwidth he said
[01:17] <gnomefreak> bharat862004: not unless you use our repo or wait untill its backported
[01:17] <asac> bharat862004: are you a brave guy ... or just want to have a stable environment ? ... otherwise you could try our dapper backport :)
[01:17] <asac> e.g. try backports if you feel brave
[01:17] <gnomefreak> asac: he thinks it will help his extension
[01:17] <bharat862004> ok i am ready to use the repository method also ... tell me ?
[01:17] <asac> what kind of extension is that?
[01:17] <gnomefreak> the extension is trash
[01:18] <asac> bharat862004: be warned ... it might upgrade a lot applications for you
[01:18] <bharat862004> ok i'm not bothered about my extension now... just wanna update the firefox.... that's it :)
[01:18] <gnomefreak> asac: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1672
[01:18] <asac> bharat862004: what version do you want?
[01:18] <bharat862004> latest version....
[01:19] <asac> so latest 1.5.0.x version is not latest for you?
[01:19] <bharat862004> hope that does not take to much time to update firefox :)
[01:19] <asac> you want latest 2.0.0.x ?
[01:19] <asac> bharat862004: if you don't have time better don't use our repos
[01:19] <bharat862004> asac: yes... i guess that suppose to be the latest ? isnt it ?
[01:19] <asac> depends :)
[01:19] <bharat862004> asac: I HAVE TIME
[01:20] <asac> 1.5.0.12 is latest 1.5 version
[01:20] <asac> 2.0.0.4 is latest 2.0 version
[01:20] <asac> 3.0 alpha5 is latest 3.0 version :)
[01:20] <DarkMageZ> plugin isn't 3.0 happy
[01:20] <bharat862004> asac: stop playing games now :)
[01:20] <gnomefreak> ah its .3
[01:22] <asac> should work
[01:22] <asac> bharat862004: if you add our repo, do an apt-get update
[01:22] <gnomefreak> will find out this afternoon
[01:22] <asac> then do a apt-get dist-upgrade
[01:23] <asac> but DON'T confirm that you want to go ahead
[01:23] <DarkMageZ> um, dappers handling of control files is lesser than feistys. so no $source-version
[01:23] <asac> show us what apt wants to do, so we can at least see if something obvious break
[01:23] <DarkMageZ> and other things like that
[01:23] <gnomefreak> DarkMageZ: 2.0.0.3 i already backported :)
[01:23] <asac> gnomefreak: yes ... right ... we needed to fix control
[01:23] <gnomefreak> asac: yep
[01:24] <gnomefreak> iirc we had to do that with .3 as well
[01:24] <gnomefreak> it was the - and : change iirc
[01:25] <DarkMageZ> is there any news on if the ubuntu guys are going to start building their apps against libxul instead of firefox? so you'll beable to break firefox api/abi with cool updates without breaking their apps?
[01:28] <bharat862004> ok guys i give up... i am sticking to my default version of firefox.... :)
[01:29] <DarkMageZ> bharat862004, what was your problem with that plugin? i've been playing around with it for afew minutes.
[01:29] <bharat862004> nothing much :)
[01:30] <bharat862004> sometimes linux is screwed up... but still i like linux dont know y... :(
[01:33] <bharat862004> :-P
[01:34] <bharat862004> is their anything u would like to say before i leave O:-)
[01:35] <DarkMageZ> it's probably time for a clean install. careful with admin apps & commands as they can and will do damage if used incorrectly.
[01:36] <DarkMageZ> feisty has lots of bug fixes and cool new stuff like flash 9
[01:36] <DarkMageZ> and firefox 2 :P
[01:36] <bharat862004> i recently installed ubuntu.... so its already clean :P
[01:36] <bharat862004> not concerned about firefox 2 :P
[01:36] <bharat862004> lol
[01:37] <gnomefreak> asac: do you read planet ubuntu?
[01:37] <DarkMageZ> if firefox is crashing on startup, something is wrong. have you managed to remove that plugin?
[01:37] <bharat862004> mv /.moziila /.mozilla.bak
[01:37] <bharat862004> by changing the profile
[01:37] <bharat862004> isnt that the correct way ???????
[01:37] <bharat862004> :P
[01:38] <DarkMageZ> that'll do
[01:39] <bharat862004> bot
[01:39] <bharat862004> ubotu
[01:39] <bharat862004> ubuntu
[01:39] <bharat862004> mozilla
[01:39] <bharat862004> bot isnt working ??
[01:39] <DarkMageZ> um, ubotu serves different purposes here.
[01:40] <DarkMageZ> bug #123
[01:40] <bharat862004> ok
[01:40] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 123 in rosetta "There's no direct way to see the project info when translating it" [Medium,Fix released]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/123
[01:44] <asac> gnomefreak: no ... if there is important news, please let me know .)
[01:44] <gnomefreak> something on mozembed but its just a work around
[01:44] <gnomefreak> ill get you link
[01:44] <asac> thanks
[01:45] <gnomefreak> yw
[01:46] <gnomefreak> not sure if it is same issue or not but here is the blog on it http://skunkyjay.wordpress.com/2007/06/10/mozilla-embeded-error-resolved/
[01:48] <DarkMageZ> could also be this? https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137189
[01:48] <ubotu> Mozilla bug 137189 in Plug-ins "Windowless plug-in support for X (WMODE)" [Normal,Assigned] 
[01:56] <asac> gnomefreak: i posted a comment :)
[01:56] <gnomefreak> k ill look in a bit
[01:59] <redmonkey> hello
[02:00] <gnomefreak> hi
[02:00] <redmonkey> i cannot run thunderbird anymore. i recieve a segmentation fault as soon as i start it :(
[02:00] <gnomefreak> i hate the use of the word resolved in his comment.
[02:00] <gnomefreak> redmonkey: extensions/addons/themes installed?
[02:00] <redmonkey> only root is able to run it without crashing it
[02:00] <redmonkey> gnomefreak: nothing
[02:01] <redmonkey> i also tried to delete /home/myname/.mozilla-thunderbird completely. but it didnt help
[02:01] <gnomefreak> asac: not under your name you didnt (atleast on his blog
[02:01] <gnomefreak> redmonkey: try running it in safe mode
[02:01] <redmonkey> gnomefreak: ok, how?
[02:02] <gnomefreak> thunderbird -safe-mode i think
[02:03] <redmonkey> Warning: unrecognized command line flag -save-mode
[02:03] <gnomefreak> redmonkey: or mozilla-thunderbird -safe-mode
[02:03] <gnomefreak> redmonkey: you have typo
[02:03] <redmonkey> oops sorry
[02:03] <redmonkey> didnt work. same error:
[02:03] <redmonkey> DOUBLE-CLICK: 300 --> -1 THRESHOLD: 8 --> -1 Segmentation fault (core dumped)
[02:05] <gnomefreak> redmonkey: what version of ubuntu what version of tbird?
[02:06] <redmonkey> ubuntu 7.04 thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (from the repos)
[02:07] <gnomefreak> redmonkey: can you file a bug report and attach the crash report in /var/crash so we can better find what is going on with it. did it work at all with that version?
[02:08] <gnomefreak> asac: maybe wordpress needs a while to update
[02:09] <redmonkey> yes, it worked without any problems before
[02:09] <gnomefreak> before the .12 update?
[02:09] <redmonkey> file a bug report.. uh-oh, i never did that before
[02:09] <gnomefreak> or worked with .12 for a while than just stopped?
[02:10] <gnomefreak> !bugs | redmonkey
[02:10] <ubotu> redmonkey: If you find a bug in Ubuntu or any of its derivatives, please file a bug report at: http://bugs.ubuntu.com/  -  Bugs in/wishes for the bots can be filed at http://launchpad.net/products/ubuntu-bots
[02:10] <gnomefreak> it should prety much walk you through it. you will have to submit the bug before you can attach teh log file
[02:11] <redmonkey> it worked without any problems in the last version. then i couldnt start it anymore. a few days later i updated to .12 to check if the bug has been fixed, but it hasnt.
[02:12] <redmonkey> but why am i able to run it as root?
[02:13] <gnomefreak> well the easy things that were asked didnt help. please file bug and attach the file, the file is gonna be needed. not sure maybe root bypasses your profile
[02:16] <gnomefreak> )
[02:19] <gnomefreak> that is odd when version is (= 2:1.fire...$(Source-Version) but when it uses >= its (Source:Version)
[02:20] <gnomefreak> maybe its just me that finds that weird
[02:23] <gnomefreak> ok im out for a bit i got a few hours before i can start on it anyway
[02:28] <redmonkey> seems like that bug has already been reported:
[02:28] <redmonkey> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozilla-thunderbird/+bug/72332
[02:28] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 72332 in mozilla-thunderbird "thunderbird crashes on start" [Medium,Confirmed] 
[02:29] <redmonkey> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozilla-thunderbird/+bug/70649
[02:29] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 70649 in mozilla-thunderbird "Thunderbird crash" [Medium,Needs info] 
[02:30] <redmonkey> it describes it extactly
[03:23] <hjmf> hmm, redmonkey attached his report to an existing bug, weird he should open a new one (easier for me)... retracing
[04:15] <hjmf> bug 70649
[04:15] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 70649 in thunderbird "Thunderbird crashes after finishing the creation of an email account (dup-of: 115602)" [High,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/70649
[04:15] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 115602 in thunderbird "MASTER thunderbird crashed [@nsHTMLReflowState::CalcLineHeight]  [@nsBlockReflowState] " [High,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/115602
[04:17] <hjmf> one hour for doing the OP's retraces on a edgy chroot trying to get a good one with such old report and the same again for the new one in feisty chroot damn! how easy would have been if redmonkey just have opened a new crash report
[04:18] <hjmf> :)
[04:48] <asac> hjmf: we cannot care for everyone
[04:49] <asac> just ignore that report
[06:08] <gnomefreak> --enable-system-myspell \   thats a good thing :(
[06:09] <gnomefreak> we really need a damn patch system for pre gutsy firefox
[06:11] <gnomefreak> asac: do you remember what you changed to fix myspell errors during build?
[06:15] <gnomefreak> trying something to fix this
[06:21] <asac> hmm
[06:21] <asac> i don't remember ... are you updating dapper backport?
[06:21] <asac> gnomefreak: ^^?
[06:21] <gnomefreak> using feisty source to do it but yes
[06:22] <gnomefreak> i just installed libmyspell-dev to see if that was problem
[06:29] <asac> gnomefreak: do you still have the last package?
[06:30] <asac> gnomefreak:  better use the diff.gz from that and apply the patch on top of an extracted fresh upstream tarball
[06:32] <asac> gnomefreak: actuallyl i think that i should update it ... there have been some patches applied upstream, which now need some work to make our patches work seemlessly with it
[06:35] <gnomefreak> k go for it. i have it building but im getting ready to walk out the door for a while
[06:36] <asac> not today :)
[06:36] <gnomefreak> no its not important
[06:40] <asac> @now new york
[06:40] <ubotu> Current time in America/New_York: June 12 2007, 12:40:50 - Next meeting: Edubuntu in 19 hours 19 minutes
[06:41] <asac> @now
[06:41] <ubotu> Current time in Etc/UTC: June 12 2007, 16:41:13 - Next meeting: Edubuntu in 19 hours 18 minutes
[06:41] <asac> @now eastern
[06:41] <ubotu> Current time in Canada/Eastern: June 12 2007, 12:41:39 - Next meeting: Edubuntu in 19 hours 18 minutes
[06:41] <asac> @now america/+eastern
[06:41] <asac> @now america/eastern
[07:20] <asac> ok ... i am out for today .... this took my energy for today: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+source/gnash/0.8.0~cvs20070611.1016-1ubuntu1
[07:26] <JenFraggle> looks complicated
[07:26] <JenFraggle> I'm looking at the MozillaTeam wiki for newbie friendliness
[07:28] <asac> JenFraggle: yeah ... go ahead :)
[07:31] <Admiral_Chicago> JenFraggle: I'm thinking of beefing up https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/Proceduces
[07:32] <Admiral_Chicago> yes Precedures..
[07:32] <Admiral_Chicago> Procedures.
[07:32] <Admiral_Chicago> i'm not on today..
[07:33] <JenFraggle> it's a bit small
[07:33] <JenFraggle> i'm off out now but will mark it as another page to look at.  will make some notes and get back to you
[08:04] <gnomefreak> asac: it might build
[08:05] <gnomefreak> asac: salty-horse has a question about a bug iirc i just came home to pick up a phone number and im out again :)
[08:07] <salty-horse> hi. about https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/82168 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/113683 -- in retrospect, I think the real problem is that mozilla products don't use the "east-west / north-south resize" mouse cursors - I can't find a screenshot tool that captures the cursor. if you still need a screenshot, can you assist me with this?
[08:07] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 82168 in firefox "autoscroll shows the "resize up" cursor" [Medium,Confirmed] 
[08:11] <asac> salty-horse: i am out ... can you be here tomorrow? ... at best a few hours earlier?
[08:11] <asac> actuallyl i am in conference now, but then out directly
[08:12] <salty-horse> asac, this is my "home" time. i'll try :) - or you could just comment on the bugs :)
[08:12] <salty-horse> i don't want to disturb
[08:31] <asac> bug 113683
[08:31] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 113683 in firefox "hovering over splitter widget sets incorrect cursor (dup-of: 82168)" [Undecided,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/113683
[08:31] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 82168 in firefox "autoscroll shows the "resize up" cursor" [Medium,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/82168
[08:31] <asac> bug 82168
[08:31] <asac> ah ... now i remember
[08:31] <asac> it should definitly be pushed upstream
[08:31] <asac> i mean its probably not ubuntu specific
[08:31] <asac> salty-horse: ^^^
[08:31] <asac> salty-horse: i will try to verify your horizontal/vertical scrollbar rule
[08:32] <asac> salty-horse: did you ever find a case where this rule doesn't hold?
[08:33] <asac> salty-horse: looks like you found the right rule
[08:33] <asac> salty-horse: wierd ... thanks
[08:34] <salty-horse> yes. see the bugs. in the bookmark/history sidebar resize (vertical), in thunderbird's email list/preview seperator, in the middle-click scroll wheel (when the page only has one of the scrollbars - otherwise it's the correct hand icon
[08:34] <salty-horse> )
[08:36] <salty-horse> i'm using gnome - maybe it's worth checking in kde
[08:37] <asac> Admiral_Chicago: can you test bug 82168 ?
[08:37] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 82168 in firefox "autoscroll shows the "resize up" cursor" [Medium,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/82168
[08:37] <asac> Admiral_Chicago: on kde :)
[08:39] <asac> salty-horse: ok thanks for following up. i will look at the duplicate tomorrow
[08:39] <asac> i am now out
[08:39] <salty-horse> Admiral_Chicago, it's easier to check with the sidebar resizer.
[08:39] <salty-horse> thanks asac
[08:53] <Admiral_Chicago> looking...
[08:56] <Admiral_Chicago> i need a page to upload too and can't remember the image site..
[08:57] <Admiral_Chicago> imageshack.us works..
[08:57] <Admiral_Chicago> asac: http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/7939/reproduceddo4.png
[08:57] <salty-horse> i'm missing an app to screenshot the cursor, not to host (I can attach the image to the launchpad bug)
[08:57] <Admiral_Chicago> yea i can reproduce it
[08:58] <salty-horse> hmm
[09:01] <salty-horse> should one bug be DUPLICATEd?
[09:02] <Admiral_Chicago> what do ou mean
[09:03] <salty-horse> i reported two bugs on the subject: 82168 and 113683
[09:03] <Admiral_Chicago> yea the screen shot thing didn't get teh cursor
[09:03] <Admiral_Chicago> mark the older one as a dup of the younger one
[09:03] <Admiral_Chicago> err the other way around...
[09:04] <salty-horse> btw, how does your screenshot show the bug? :)
[09:04] <salty-horse> oh, you answered :)
[09:06] <Admiral_Chicago> well i'll try in a vm, that may work
[09:06] <Admiral_Chicago> i think it has to do with the way the mouse is drawn
[09:42] <gnomefreak> ok im back for a while i think
[09:46] <gnomefreak> asac: did i miss something? Accepted iceape 1.1.1+u2-0ubuntu1 (source) (Ubuntu Installer)  thought pitti rejected it or did you upload again?
[10:54] <gnomefreak> @schedule new_york
[10:54] <ubotu> Schedule for America/New_York: 13 Jun 08:00: Edubuntu | 14 Jun 12:00: Ubuntu Development Team | 16 Jun 13:00: Xubuntu Developers | 19 Jun 15:00: Technical Board | 20 Jun 16:00: Edubuntu | 21 Jun 14:00: Mozilla Team
[10:54] <gnomefreak> ok our meeting is set up
[10:57] <JenFraggle> cool
[10:59] <Admiral_Chicago> great
[11:00] <gnomefreak> if anyone has agenda items please add them.
[11:03] <gnomefreak> Admiral_Chicago: did you just change your status on jabber?
[11:03] <gnomefreak> i just got a little bit of music cant figure out what it was from
[11:04] <Admiral_Chicago> gnomefreak: yea it was me, i launced gaim.
[11:04] <gnomefreak> ah ok ty
[11:04] <Admiral_Chicago> playing with getting psi to work
[11:04] <Admiral_Chicago> JenFraggle: if you feel adventureous, dansguardian could use a clue file
[11:05] <Admiral_Chicago> JenFraggle: http://pastebin.ca/562611
[11:32] <asac> gnomefreak: i fixed and uploaded iceape
[11:32] <asac> and pushed pitti to let it in :)
[11:32] <asac> i will push the new remove.nonfree script
[11:33] <asac> once binaries are NEWed as well we need to push 1.1.3
[11:33] <asac> or whatever the latest is
[11:38] <gnomefreak> 1.1.2
[11:38] <gnomefreak> might want to build it before you upload it ;)
[11:39] <asac> gnomefreak: oh i think i messed it up :)
[11:39] <asac> either its debian version ... or the new tarball still contains the binaries :)
[11:39] <gnomefreak> 1.1.1?
[11:39] <asac> yes 1.1.1 is what we have atm
[11:40] <asac> we should definitly prepare 1.1.2 :)
[11:40] <asac> and upload as soon as 1.1.1 gets binary NEWed
[11:40] <asac> let me fix this :)
[11:40] <gnomefreak> that way its never noticed lol
[11:41] <gnomefreak> 1.1.2 isnt gonna be easy although most of it is removing patches. let me know if my patch applies ok please
[11:42] <asac> which patch?
[11:42] <asac> ah your menu patch? hope its actually in atm
[11:42] <gnomefreak> 82_prefs_ubuntu.dpatch
[11:42] <asac> let me see as soon as tree was cleaned here
[11:42] <gnomefreak> its in my branch
[11:42] <asac> ah ok
[11:42] <gnomefreak> think we have 3 iceeape branches
[11:42] <asac> let me first sync here
[11:45] <asac> ok i updated mozilla team debian.1.1.x branch
[11:46] <gnomefreak> wasent debian.1.1.x already updated with mikes changes
[11:46] <gnomefreak> that should be wasnt
[11:51] <asac> gnomefreak: can you look what you have as 1.1.1-3 in changelog
[11:52] <asac> e.g. what text
[11:52] <gnomefreak> looking
[11:53] <gnomefreak> what one
[11:53] <gnomefreak> there are 9 releases of that
[11:53] <gnomefreak> give or take 1
[11:53] <gnomefreak> ill pastebin all
[11:54] <asac> wow
[11:54] <asac> i already found it
[11:54] <gnomefreak> i guess we combined them
[11:54] <asac> apparently mike wiped 1.1.1-3
[11:54] <asac> changlog entry
[11:54] <gnomefreak> http://gnomefreak.pastebin.ca/562743
[11:54] <asac> by bumping to 1.1.2-1
[11:54] <asac> and adding more content to it
[11:54] <asac> e.g. see
[11:54] <gnomefreak> yes
[11:55] <gnomefreak> i saw that
[11:55] <asac> http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-mozilla/iceape/trunk/debian/changelog?op=log&rev=0&sc=1&isdir=0
[11:55] <gnomefreak> he started at 1.1.1-3 than moved to -2 thats why we got all screed up
[11:55] <gnomefreak> screwed up
[11:55] <asac> 39902 vs. 39917
[11:55] <asac> i think 1.1.1-3 was never released to debian
[11:55] <asac> so its valid
[11:55] <asac> ok
[11:56] <gnomefreak> we got it from experimental than they killed it and released 1.1.1-2 to sid iirc
[11:58] <JenFraggle> I've copied the states and tags wiki pages and am working my way through checking them.  seems funny being written in american rather than english
[11:59] <asac> this is really messy
[11:59] <asac> i mean fixing this changelog mess
[11:59] <gnomefreak> his or ours?
[12:00] <asac> this changelog merge mess i mean
[12:00] <asac> problem is i pushed changes to ubuntu ... and to debian
[12:00] <asac> under different version numbers
[12:00] <gnomefreak> ah
[12:00] <asac> .e.g using different versions ... so shall i duplicate changelog entries now?
[12:00] <asac> i think yes, since the changes were not really applied :/
[12:01] <gnomefreak> wait our changes you pushed to debian were never applied?
[12:02] <asac> yeah i think i had a bad day yesterday :)
[12:02] <asac> i pushed a bad version to debian svn ;)
[12:02] <asac> maybe i should stop being online for a while
[12:02] <asac> as mike will definitly laugh at me ;)
[12:03] <gnomefreak> it happens to all of us
[12:03] <asac> hehe was just kidding
[12:03] <asac> http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-mozilla/iceape/trunk/debian/changelog?op=file&rev=39926&sc=1
[12:03] <asac> look
[12:03] <asac> i used -2
[12:03] <asac> though it should have been -
[12:03] <asac> -1
[12:03] <asac> e.g. the version
[12:04] <gnomefreak> why -1 if mikes is -2
[12:04] <asac> yeah look
[12:04] <gnomefreak> or is it because of version name
[12:04] <asac> its because i bumped upstream version
[12:05] <gnomefreak> ah ok
[12:05] <asac> because that change means it needs a new orig
[12:11] <asac> ok mozillateam branch for ubuntu-1.1.x is now up to date
[12:12] <asac> you can merge changes to your branch :)
[12:13] <gnomefreak> ok will try
[12:15] <asac> gnomefreak: what is the revision i should merge to mozillateam branch?
[12:15] <asac> from yours?
[12:15] <asac> e.g. to get the prefs?
[12:15] <asac> patch?
[12:15] <gnomefreak> let me look
[12:16] <asac> i would like to prepare 1.1.2.dfsg1-2ubuntu1  so i can directly push it tomorrow
[12:16] <gnomefreak> 79for patch 80 for changelog
[12:16] <gnomefreak> i have comflicts i need to resolve
[12:17] <gnomefreak> brb
[12:18] <asac> i think most conflicts you can just resolve by copying the .OTHER file to the real name
[12:18] <asac> which conflicts do you have?
[12:19] <gnomefreak> changelog
[12:19] <gnomefreak> i havent looked at it yet
[12:25] <asac> only changelog?
[12:26] <gnomefreak> yeah i think that was my screw up
[12:26] <gnomefreak> im merging now lets see what happens
[12:27] <gnomefreak> it seems the changelog entry i pushed to my branch conflicts with yours you just pushed how do i remover a pushed entry in my branch
[12:27] <asac> gnomefreak: look in changelog