=== asac_ [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [12:56] gnomefreak: i don't feel in charge to unapprove swiftfox [12:56] it should just not be filed against firefox [12:57] can we unassign package? or maybe ask bdmurray what to do with package wishes? [01:22] its a gecko based browser, when bugs come in who do you think they will go to? and yes i can unassign us from it i will do in monring [01:22] asac: ^^ [01:49] IMHO we need to reject it as bugs will come to us and we didnt even package it === gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === Admiral_1hicago [n=FreddyM@adsl-69-209-79-241.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [08:00] I was able to pull my HDD from one compy and move it to another [08:00] I swear if its broken. I'll just buy a new computer [08:00] ^-^ === Admiral_Chicago [n=FreddyM@adsl-69-209-79-241.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === Admiral_Chicago [n=FreddyM@adsl-69-209-79-241.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === cjwatson_ [n=cjwatson@82-69-40-219.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === Admiral_Chicago [n=FreddyM@adsl-69-209-79-241.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [09:31] morning [10:18] morning === DarkMageZ [n=richard@ppp59-167-4-195.lns1.syd7.internode.on.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [10:36] gnomefreak: yes just reject it [11:07] hjmf: any idea why we keep mt-confirm for mt-reject-candidates bugs? [11:07] i am currently going through mt-confirm and have the feeling that m-reject-candidates should not be in that list :) [11:17] @schedule [11:17] Schedule for Etc/UTC: 19 Jun 19:00: Technical Board | 20 Jun 20:00: Edubuntu | 21 Jun 18:00: Mozilla Team | 21 Jun 20:00: Ubuntu Development Team | 23 Jun 20:00: Ubuntu US LoCo Team | 26 Jun 15:00: Kernel Team [11:17] @schedule berlin [11:17] Schedule for Europe/Berlin: 19 Jun 21:00: Technical Board | 20 Jun 22:00: Edubuntu | 21 Jun 20:00: Mozilla Team | 21 Jun 22:00: Ubuntu Development Team | 23 Jun 22:00: Ubuntu US LoCo Team | 26 Jun 17:00: Kernel Team [11:18] ok fine ... we are really scheduled [11:23] ok i think im here for a little while hour or so [11:35] what reject it fue to mozillateam doesnt want ot have anything to do with this package? or wait for bdmurry and see if since it is a firefox clone (for most part) we think that adding it to repos is a bad idea (it will pretty much dupe every bug thats on firefox? [11:35] ) [11:35] gnomefreak: i don't know ... actually let bdmurray do the stuff, but afaik, swiftfox doesn't have its own sources [11:35] but its just a firefox build with changed compile switches [11:35] it doesnt? [11:36] gnomefreak: try to find the swiftfox sources [11:36] thats what i thought too but i never looked into it [11:36] either its closed source [11:36] or its just a respin with wanna-be optimizations [11:36] k looking [11:36] i didn't find any [11:36] sources ... so i guess this bug is really a non-bug [11:38] Swiftfox is a binary and settings optimized build of the Mozilla Firefox web browser === gnomefreak would rather find official site saying that. brb looking [11:42] imo swiftfox is just a hoax [11:43] doesn't deserve its own nwame [11:43] and almost certainly not its own package :) [11:43] do you have bug # handy? [11:43] its not its built using ffox source [11:44] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/120699 [11:44] Launchpad bug 120699 in Ubuntu "[needs packaging] swiftfox" [Wishlist,Confirmed] [11:44] ty [11:50] its rejected [11:50] brb need coffee [12:02] anything you need (i should be around for another 30 minutes or so [12:03] n) [12:03] -n [12:03] not atm [12:03] :) [12:03] i have to go out in 30 minutes as well ... i ran low on coffee and cigarettes [12:05] ok ill be back in around 5+hours oncve i leave [12:06] ah that is good ... maybe i finished my day today by then :) [12:06] but i doubt [12:06] :) [12:06] anyway, I did too much computer stuff at weekend will probably go out for a beer today or tomorrow [12:06] go for it take the day off ;) [12:07] i only slept an hour so i may do that as well but im not employed by canoncal [12:07] hehe ... right [12:08] gnomefreak: why do you have such problems to sleep? [12:08] my problem is more to get to bed ... and then hours later to get up :) [12:09] asac: doctors cant figure it out yet [12:09] they think its sleep apnea but they are not sure they want me to take a sleep study but i havent gotten there yet [12:10] but isn't apnea that you always fail asleep ... not that you can't sleep? [12:11] cant fall asleep [12:11] have you tried drugs? [12:11] like .... [12:11] pot? [12:11] the other one starts with a n but i cant remeber it [12:11] asac: i have 4 sleeping pills as it is [12:12] thats hard [12:12] is it that your brain is twisting ... thinking stuff all the time [12:12] or just no sleep? [12:14] asac: that is most nights yeah but like last night i didnt think just couldnt fall asleep to save my life [12:14] hjmf: any idea why we keep mt-confirm for mt-reject-candidates bugs? [12:14] asac: the idea was to review the mt-confirm bugs to reject them later [12:14] or not [12:14] ah ... right [12:14] :) [12:14] good [12:14] :) [12:15] i thought that you already closed bugs that didn't receive any duplicate for some time [12:15] reject as many as you can [12:15] didn't you` [12:15] hjmf: ? [12:15] its ok .. its just that i probably got confused about it [12:15] gnomefreak: when is next CC meeting? [12:16] asac: they got tagged automatically, and when I got time I rejetct them or ask politely if it is still an issue [12:16] no date set. and seveas is out for a month or more so we are not sure yet [12:16] so they might be still open for some time [12:16] hjmf: ah ok ... so if i see a question from you i will keep them open :) [12:17] yes, I'll reject them in a week [12:17] if there's no answer [12:17] ok ... i guess i will wait with mt-confirm processing one more week then :) [12:18] asac: i will ask one of the CC guys about next meeting (they might be waiting for seveas to come back [12:19] asac: there is no way to search for mt-confirm NOT mt-reject-candidate? maybe through bug numbers? [12:19] *bugnumbers [12:19] not sure if that is implemented [12:20] hjmf: want to add yourself? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CommunityCouncilAgenda [12:20] or are you already member? [12:20] hjmf: only through bughelper i guess [12:20] asac: I'm not a member, looking [12:21] Admiral_Chicago: can you add such a rule? [12:22] Admiral_Chicago: mt-confirm is in TAGS && mt-reject-canditate is not in TAGS [12:22] Admiral_Chicago: ? [12:22] hjmf: you should definitly become a member [12:23] hjmf: http://www.ubuntu.com/community/processes/newmember [12:25] gnomefreak, asac: Sleep apnea is when you stop breathing during your sleep, causing you to almost wakeup, thus preventing deep sleep. Symptoms are extreme tiredness. gnomefreak: I think the other one you think of is narcolepsia, causing you to fall asleep suddenly and with almost no warning during the day. I don't really think either fits what asac is describing [12:25] Fjodor: what did i describe ... i have no problems with sleep :) [12:26] asac: Oh, sorry. I got you two mixed up :-$ [12:26] hehe no problem [12:27] But still, they don't really fit what _gnomefreak_ described [12:28] yeah ... its wierd [12:28] Fjodor: im just going on what drs tell me [12:29] However, insomnia is a common trait for all sorts of psychological anomalies. Not saying that you are nuts, though. Common stress springs to mind as plausible [12:30] either way they dont know what it is and last time i tried the sleep study i didnt stay long due to something happening :( [12:30] asac: seems there is no date yet for the next cc meeting, is it? [12:30] Depends, though. Are you normally "clear in the head" when you can't sleep, or are you almost, just not quite, sleeping? [12:30] hjmf: no [12:30] hjmf: yes i have no idea .... i ask dholbach [12:30] hjmf: i will ping one of the members of the CC about it when i get a minute [12:31] gnomefreak: ty [12:31] the person that sets the meetings up (CC secratery) is gone for atleast a month [12:31] I would apply for membership, but before I need to be sure to be able to attend the meeting [12:32] ah [12:32] hjmf: put you name there anyway [12:32] would you sponsor me :))) [12:32] ? [12:32] yes [12:32] apparently not yet known [12:32] im behind you 200% [12:32] ty :) [12:32] hjmf: go [12:32] add your name [12:32] OK [12:33] gnomefreak: At any rate, I'll leave the subject. Just hope you get to sleep normally sometime :-) [12:33] i will when i get home today [12:33] hjmf: if you get to know that you cannot attend remove your name [12:34] asac: Ok, then I'll append my name to that list, lets see [12:34] shoot [12:34] elmo and who [12:36] omfg who is it :( [12:36] who is what? [12:37] elmo mako and mark are the 3 orig memberse [12:37] -e [12:37] elmo almost never around, mako and mark pretty much same === hjmf added himself to member cadidates list [12:38] those would be the ones to ask' [12:38] hjmf: congrats on your membership ;) [12:39] hjmf: you wont have a problem getting it [12:39] your bug work alone will more than likely be all you need [12:40] hjmf: yeah gnomefreak is right .... do you see what is going on in bts [12:41] all cores are removed if bugs are rejected/resolved [12:41] ... or from all duplicates [12:41] ... so await lots of bug-spam on gtk_style_realize [12:41] asac gnomefreak ty [12:41] yw [12:41] asac: noticed the bug spam [12:41] ...since all duplicates get at least one mail now :) [12:41] which goes to main bug as well ... reasonably :) [12:42] lets see how many jump off from subscription list after this flood :) [12:43] asac: I also noticed that gutsy are autotagged for retrace [12:43] *gutsy bugs [12:43] though none of which I've seen seem to have a crash attached [12:44] e.g. bug 120634 [12:44] Launchpad bug 120634 in firefox "[GUTSY] firefox crashed" [Medium,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/120634 [12:44] really? [12:44] dunnot it that crash was removed, but it doesn't have the stacktrace, nor the coredump [12:44] wierd ... maybe reporter aborted upload? [12:44] other example I found this morning from gnash [12:45] bug 120916 [12:45] Launchpad bug 120916 in gnash "gnash crashed with signal 5" [Undecided,Unconfirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/120916 [12:46] hmmm ... lets wait a few more ... then ping pitte [12:46] pitt [12:46] t [12:46] pitti [12:46] :-D [12:46] yep I was thinking the same [12:46] hjmf: afaik there is some work going on to make coredumps [12:46] private [12:46] so people don't expose their credit cards et al [12:47] i am not sure if this is the case here [12:47] afaik there will be team based access-control [12:47] asac: yes I read the specification some time ago, but I expected to see the retraces directly when the bug gets public w/o the coredump [12:47] probably it is not yet implemented, I thought it would take some more time [12:48] hjmf: afaik the retraces are subject to review before pushing them to public as well [12:48] ah [12:48] e.g. soem team member has to review if there is some sensible info visible ... if not open [12:48] hjmf: at least its actively worked on atm ... as you see progress in deleting coredumps :) [12:48] yes you are right :) [12:49] lets give them a few days [12:49] to sort things out [12:49] I'm anxious! :-P [12:50] im getting crash reports sort of nautilus crashed yesterday and there was a report in my home dir [12:50] Im waiting for a bunch of reports from gutsy [12:50] in your home dir? [12:50] hjmf: yes ... me too [12:51] asac: yep [12:51] but its not yet turned on afaik [12:51] afaik the idea is: as long as privacy issues are not resolved, don't turn it on [12:51] at lesat thats what was said at last weeks development team meeting [12:51] it was giving me an empty file named core (in whatever dir you are cd'ed into when running from terminal) [12:52] which are the requisites to access private bugs? [12:52] you are cced [12:52] afaik [12:52] ah [12:52] or assignee [12:52] i have no idea [12:52] ah ok :) [12:52] i have just seen one private bug so far that is kind of support request [12:53] ... from a canonical customer [12:53] ok bbl shower time so i can get going long drive :( [12:53] but that is a bug that is not even specific ;) [12:53] hjmf: the idea is to allow the right teams to see the bugs [12:54] btw firefox-trunk has been updated and fixed in preview (if anyone noticed it was borked. and gnash is done [12:54] gnomefreak: gnash is done? ... didn't i pushed it over to my archive yesterday already? [12:54] asac: did you grab the 386 binaries? [12:55] afaik yes [12:55] ah ok [12:55] than scratch that gnash one [12:55] http://people.ubuntu.com/~asac/gnash-feisty/ [12:55] trunk still fixed ;) [12:55] ok [12:55] ;) [12:55] fine [12:55] ok im out [12:55] asac: lets wait we are the first group allowed to see mozilla bugs :-P [12:55] asac: gnomefreak I'm off for a while, see you [12:55] hjmf: ok [12:55] me too [12:55] hjmf: cu [12:56] cu you [12:56] i am out for lunch now [12:56] need to get coffee (prio 1 task) === smcgraw is away: I'm away === smcgraw is back (gone 00:00:37) [01:42] k coffee ... cigarettes ... all here [01:42] me as well of course :) [01:42] anyone notice apport doing a cleanup? [01:48] yeah ... coredumps get removed from issues that are resolved somehow === Starting logfile irclogs/ubuntu-mozillateam.log === ubuntulog [i=ubuntulo@ubuntu/bot/ubuntulog] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === Topic for #ubuntu-mozillateam: Home of Ubuntu Mozilla Team - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam | Bug Triagers please read: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/ | Firefox trunk package source : https://code.launchpad.net/~asac/firefox/trunk | Mailing List: ubuntu-mozillateam@lists.ubuntu.com | Next meeting is June 21, 2007 1800UTC in #ubuntu-meeting. === Topic (#ubuntu-mozillateam): set by gnomefreak at Wed Jun 13 02:36:34 2007 [04:35] i hate changelog syntax errors [04:36] ok found :) [05:14] bluekuja: you want to adopt libagg in debian? [06:17] hmm, again no backtrace, no coredump: bug 121007 [06:17] Launchpad bug 121007 in firefox "firefox-bin crashed with signal 5" [Undecided,Unconfirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/121007 [06:19] same on bug 121014 [06:19] Launchpad bug 121014 in firefox "firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV" [Undecided,Unconfirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/121014 [06:19] hjmf: i will talk to pitti tomorrow [06:20] i guess all new crashes are hidden atm [06:20] asac: I guess that too, I'll look for what apport-crash tag means [06:20] probably means that apport runners should look in to hidden archive to get the crash dump [06:21] and try auto-dupe merge ... etc .... no idea [06:21] if you find out, let me know :) [06:21] ok [06:27] asac: not that exact tag, but this is the specification: [06:27] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CrashReporting [06:27] 1. Create Launchpad users which control access to the bug, split by main/restricted and universe/multiverse. [06:27] 2. Apport files bugs as private/nonsecurity by default, with only the crash reprocessing bot subscribed (Launchpad user apport, the "Apport retracing service"). [06:27] 3. The retracing bot generates the symbolic stack traces, handles duplicates (see [UbuntuSpec] apport-crash-duplicates), and removes the core dump attachment. Then it subscribes the relevant team to the bug. [06:27] 4. The triaging teams regularly inspect crash reports (preferably prioritized by number of duplicates). After verifying that a stack trace does not contain sensitive information, they can set the bug to "public". [06:28] I guess the system is working but we cannot see it !? [06:29] or the retraces aren't working right [06:30] he? [06:30] hjmf: i will figure out ... since i am in core dev i should be able to see those bugs (if any exist already) [06:31] hjmf: ping me tomorrow about this ... we have to find a way to involve people from mozillateam in trace evaluation [06:31] lets see [06:31] asac: ok. I'll be patient then, I wont triage those ones until we know something :) [06:31] actually i have no idea how to search for those crash reports [06:32] hjmf: there are no bugs cced to core-dev [06:32] atm [06:32] so maybe this has even been moved to a different team or bugs are just not yet CCed to teams [06:32] (or bugs are not yet created :)) [06:33] i guess the latter [06:36] heya asac! [06:36] just went home from work [06:36] :) [06:37] bluekuja: heya [06:37] i will went out soon out from my home/work to the streets of hamburg :) [06:37] asac: :D [06:37] asac: talk me about libagg please :) [06:37] looks interesting [06:37] bluekuja: currently maintainer by ooo team [06:38] bluekuja: but according to baby they will drop it [06:38] bluekuja: she told me that she will adopt it [06:38] bluekuja: but honestly, i don't feel good about her maintaining a library [06:38] bluekuja: so i am looking for someone with technical potential to package a library properly :) [06:38] e.g. we will need this for gnash soon [06:39] asac: sounds good, does it need an update? [06:39] e.g new release [06:39] (unless we use opengl for gutsy) [06:39] bluekuja: i think so ... 2.4 is in ... 2.5 is out [06:39] :) [06:39] great! :) [06:39] bluekuja: please do not yet start ... i will talk to debian openoffice maintainers first [06:39] just wanted to know if you would be willing to adopt [06:40] asac: yeah, it's ok for me. Now I finish work at 5 o'clock, after I will be free for it [06:40] so ok [06:40] :) [06:40] asac: keep me updated :) [06:41] will [06:43] sounds great :) [06:45] asac: btw who is baby? [06:46] asac: ctorrent in testing [06:46] :) [06:48] bluekuja: baby is debian gnash maintainer [06:49] bluekuja: congrats [06:49] asac: :) [06:49] asac: verlihub will be a great package [06:49] a lot of ppl use it [06:49] hehe [06:49] yeah finally maybe some bug traffic [06:49] for you [06:49] yup :) [06:49] how many bugs processed? [06:50] so far? [06:50] mmm... [06:50] 2? :) [06:50] something like 3-4 [06:50] I think [06:50] :) === bluekuja hopes that ftp masters will process the queue [06:50] we all hope :) [06:50] :) [06:50] is huge [06:50] i even hope that they will do so for gutsy [06:50] ahha [06:51] yeah : [06:51] I want greatparadise in! [06:51] its not yet really huge [06:51] there where times where lots of packages were multiple month old :) [06:51] there were [06:51] really?? [06:51] yes [06:51] for debconf ? [06:51] like this time [06:51] no ... for no ftpmaster spare-time :) [06:52] oh :D [06:52] and noone else with permissions ;) [06:52] how many ftp-masters are there? [06:52] dunno at that point there were 2 :) [06:52] :D [06:52] what's the process to become ftp-masters? [06:52] now it should be 6? no idea [06:52] thats not documented [06:53] a DD with a lot of experience [06:53] in fact [06:53] which actually was one of the big reasons for huge ml-wars in the past [06:54] well, ftp-masters can control all the package's traffic [06:54] two main problems: bottleneck of ftp-master, bottleneck in security team, in release team and of course *DAM* :-D [06:54] 4 main problems :) [06:54] i can't tell how much energy was wasted for those discussions [06:55] but probably 90% ;) [06:55] :D [06:55] asac: are you a DAM member? [06:55] hehe [06:55] e.g you can process new maintainers [06:55] no [06:55] your decision? [06:56] i am an AM (application manager) ... i only help, test and push out a recommondation [06:56] then there is frontdesk that quality assures my recommondation before it goes to dam state [06:56] cool [06:56] there is 1 person reviewing things yet another time before the application gets pushed to the single person allowed to add things to keyring [06:56] elmo [06:56] ;) [06:56] :D [06:57] huge bottleneck [06:57] elmo is the only one that can add a key to the debian keyring? [06:57] but its ok ... somehow the job is done and the DAM queue is under control [06:57] yes [06:57] joerg (ganneff) is the second DAM [06:57] that's really nice [06:58] but afaik he still can't add by himself [06:58] he just gives green light and elmo trusts him to a good extend [06:58] i don't know if this is really nice [06:58] it just takes ages [06:58] to go through NM [06:59] yeah [06:59] ... but having short time contributors doesn't help much either [06:59] so ... i am not one of those that says that this needs an immediate fix [06:59] yeah, you're right [07:00] asac: why not at debconf? [07:01] my bad. i somehow missed the train ... but i don't think its that important :) ... though would have been nice. now i can work more on my specs :) [07:02] hehee [07:02] yeah :) [07:02] and this weekend i don't have time anyway :) ... family calls. [07:02] :D [07:02] I'll be at the sea [07:02] ^^ [07:02] i wanted to go to mozilla developer day in paris, but didn't because of that :) [07:03] hmmm i think we should drop xulrunner python xpcom package from ubuntu [07:03] y? [07:04] lurked on irc that bsmedberg wants this to be maintained outside of xulrunner ... basically doesn't want to maintain the code [07:04] i think he found out that python2.5 broke api ... and python xpcom doesn build against new python anymore [07:05] i started to do a real fix, but then it was not just a line :) [07:06] :D [07:06] asac: do you have a minute for a merge? [07:06] :) [07:06] simple one? [07:07] yup [07:07] don't ask to ask ;) [07:07] give me a link i let you know [07:07] adding the bug [07:07] :) [07:07] just a moment [07:09] asac: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gpib/+bug/121022 [07:09] Launchpad bug 121022 in gpib "Merge gpib 3.2.06-3.2 from debian unstable" [Undecided,Confirmed] [07:10] -binary-predeb/php4-gpib:: [07:10] - echo "php:Depends=phpapi-$(phpapiver)" >> debian/php4-gpib.substvars [07:10] - [07:10] ups [07:10] is that needed to fullfill the task to [07:10] Don't build a php4 module anymore [07:10] ? [07:10] yeah [07:10] i mean it would build without that hunk, right? [07:11] yeah, I build it now to be sure [07:11] yeah ... drop that hunk [07:11] its easier to reenable later [07:11] yeah, it has been dropped [07:11] now building [07:12] yeah ... update debdiff [07:12] where is the merge in merges.ubuntu.com [07:12] asac: http://dad.dunnewind.net/gpib/ [07:13] bluekuja: where can i see it on merges.ubuntu.com [07:14] why is there no merge requested for that package [07:14] asac: http://merges.ubuntu.com/universe.html [07:14] check gpib [07:15] why do we need to disable that package? [07:16] which? [07:16] asac: we just need to report remaining changes [07:16] the one that is disabled [07:16] added before [07:16] so if a developer added it, it should be kept [07:16] when merging again [07:17] not true ... it whould be verified if its still needed to carry the difference [07:17] the goal is to get in synch again [07:17] so 1. find reason why it was disabled [07:17] yeah [07:17] but [07:17] 2. check if reason still exists [07:17] debian did not add it [07:17] so we cant sync [07:17] he? [07:18] i mean [07:18] debian didnt add anything regarding it on new changelog entry [07:18] so we assume that those changes should be kept for ubuntu [07:19] bluekuja: point is ... when was this reviewed the last time [07:20] asac: for feisty [07:20] if you see that change was introduced in same upstream version ... then yes [07:20] otherwise, it should be checked [07:20] yeah [07:20] that's right [07:21] asac: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/t/tipa/tipa_1.3-7_all.deb [07:22] dunno what that is about :) [07:23] was trying to get build it [07:23] and one of the deps [07:23] is tipe [07:23] *tipa [07:23] I don't know why it does not get the last version [07:24] (is not specified in debian control) [07:24] sending it to build-machine [07:24] something wrong with my pbuilder [07:24] (maybe) [07:30] asac: gonna ping you with build logs [07:31] in a min [07:34] yeah in 2 min i am out :) [07:34] so better hurry ;) [07:35] yeah! [07:35] :) [07:35] bluekuja: please figure out why php4 was dropped [07:35] maybe contact the developer doing this ;) [07:35] yeah, is geser [07:35] otherwise we cannot decide on this [07:36] yeah .. .ask him ... just let me know ... i am out more or less [07:36] asac: you will be back later? === JenFraggle [n=jen@host217-43-183-130.range217-43.btcentralplus.com] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [07:38] maybe [07:38] asac: I take it as a "yes" [07:38] :P [07:38] haha ... don't count on it [07:38] i will try [07:38] sounds great! :) [07:47] this one looks better despite the horrible summary; bug 121027 [07:47] Launchpad bug 121027 in gnash "gnash crashed with SIGSEGV in std::_Rb_tree, boost::intrusive_ptr, std::_Identity >, std::less >, std::allocator > >::erase()" [Undecided,Unconfirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/121027 [07:47] it has a retrace and the coredump attached [07:49] maybe the other bug reports were some kind of *short crash reports*; dunno === JenFraggle [n=jen@host217-43-183-130.range217-43.btcentralplus.com] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [09:15] asac: you can build a custom clue file for that [09:15] they are both in tags [09:15] Admiral_Chicago, he's away [09:15] :) [09:15] thanks bluekuja [09:15] np :) [09:15] Admiral_Chicago, I've seen your photo [09:15] on lp [09:16] is it currently photo or younger? [09:16] uh, it was taken last year [09:16] cool [09:16] how old are you? [09:16] 20 now [09:16] nice [09:16] :) [09:18] JenFraggle: around? === poningru [n=poningru@ip72-196-112-63.ga.at.cox.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === JenFraggle [n=jen@host217-43-183-130.range217-43.btcentralplus.com] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === Admiral_Chicago [n=FreddyM@ubuntu/member/admiral-chicago] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === cjwatson_ [n=cjwatson@82-69-40-219.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === asac [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === bluekuja [n=andrea@ubuntu/member/bluekuja] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === Fjodor [n=sune@0x55510b65.adsl.cybercity.dk] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === tonyyarusso [n=anthony@ubuntu/member/tonyyarusso] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === red_herring [n=rj@unaffiliated/redherring/x-220354] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === ubotu [n=ubotu@ubuntu/bot/ubotu] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === rhelmer [n=rhelmer@people.mozilla.com] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [10:00] thats odd [10:02] not as odd as it should be :( === gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [11:31] raise the curtain :) [11:34] bluekuja: i am here ... while not at full conscience :) [11:57] bluekuja: ok no problem ... i am out :) ... doing some more bug processing as a sleeping pill ;) [12:10] ;) [12:12] pushed tbirds bugs down to one page aka 75 bugs :) [12:13] firefox stillat 575 [12:14] and 1350 or something if you don't eliminate duplicates === Gustavo [n=croscato@201-43-27-174.dsl.telesp.net.br] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [12:15] Hi all. Why when a checkout firefox 2.0.0.4 and build-it, when it starts its named "Bon Echo" and not "Firefox"? [12:15] yeah ... because its not configured to be an official [12:15] build [12:15] Gustavo: anyway .. this is the wrong place to ask [12:16] unless you want to build ubuntu/debian packages :) [12:16] go irc.mozilla.org [12:16] I'm sorry. But thanks for the help. [12:16] or http://forums.mozillazine.org [12:16] np [12:16] asac: Bye and thankyou === Gustavo [n=croscato@201-43-27-174.dsl.telesp.net.br] has left #ubuntu-mozillateam ["Kopete] [12:16] Gustavo: but if you are [12:16] :) [12:16] bye [12:16] ;) [12:17] wtf is wrong with wiki [12:17] slow ? [12:17] no [12:17] not showing up as it should [12:17] he? [12:17] startpage looks ok here [12:17] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/Triage/Responses+ [12:17] oops [12:17] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/Triage/Responses scroll to bottom [12:18] its not showing up like code [12:18] not for me :) [12:18] works for me [12:18] it looks fine? [12:18] hmmmmm [12:18] yeah [12:18] try to reload [12:18] with shift [12:18] or ctrl [12:18] ctrl+r [12:18] :) [12:18] ctr+shift+r [12:18] ctrl+shift+r [12:18] :) === asac is using epiphany ... as usual [12:19] im using ff [12:19] trunk build? [12:20] gnomefreak: did tbird have a soft landing :) [12:20] or anyone complains on other channels that things are broken [12:20] ;) [12:20] its there i havent heard anything yet [12:20] good [12:20] should have been soft [12:21] but who knows ;) [12:21] it was final 2.0.0.4? [12:21] yeah [12:21] released on friday [12:21] i subscribed to a total of 4 new mailing lists [12:21] so i won't miss announcement next time [12:22] they apparently don't announce final releases on security list nor security-announce anymore [12:22] i knew that i missed something ;) [12:22] damnit wtf [12:22] but it was not critical ... gutsy only + i uploaded security fixes with rc1 already [12:22] afaik there was no change from rc1 to final anyway [12:22] other than version.txt [12:22] ;) [12:22] lol [12:24] i cant get it to look right its starting to piss me off [12:24] what? [12:24] trun? [12:24] trunk? [12:24] Thanks for your report. Your idea might get more attention and have the possibility of being implemented if you submit a specification for it. First check whether the idea is already registered <[WWW] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+specs>, and if so, contact the specification's drafter about your ideas. Otherwise, you can start writing a spec yourself. <[WWW] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FeatureSpecifications> [12:24] that part looks right to you? [12:24] why not? [12:24] no firefox 2.0.0.4 [12:24] [[[Thanks for your report. Your idea might get more attention and have the possibility of being implemented if you submit a specification for it. First check whether the idea is already registered <[WWW] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+specs>, and if so, contact the specification's drafter about your ideas. Otherwise, you can start writing a spec yourself. <[WWW] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FeatureSpecifications> ] ] ] [12:24] everything on wiki looks good for me in ffox 2.0.0.4 [12:25] in feisty though [12:25] thats how im seeing it [12:25] give me the link again please [12:25] with the brakets [12:25] have it [12:25] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/Triage/Responses [12:25] gnomefreak: yes [12:25] thats in deed broken [12:25] but its most likely a syntax error in wiki text [12:26] it should be [12:26] so its not me [12:26] {{{ .... }}} [12:26] no [12:26] k [12:26] its wrong wiki formatting [12:26] wanna change? [12:26] just replace [[[ -> {{{ and ] ] ] -> }}} [12:26] yeah i noticed that now [12:26] ty [12:27] small font here in firefox [12:27] actually i am not happy with only those kind of feature request template [12:27] we shouldn't post that if its a feature request for upstream