=== Starting logfile irclogs/ubuntu-mozillateam.log === ubuntulog [i=ubuntulo@ubuntu/bot/ubuntulog] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === Topic for #ubuntu-mozillateam: Home of Ubuntu Mozilla Team - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam | Bug Triagers please read: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/ | Firefox trunk package source : https://code.launchpad.net/~asac/firefox/trunk | Mailing List: ubuntu-mozillateam@lists.ubuntu.com | Next meeting is June 21, 2007 1800UTC in #ubuntu-meeting. === Topic (#ubuntu-mozillateam): set by gnomefreak at Wed Jun 13 02:36:34 2007 === #ubuntu-mozillateam [freenode-info] channel flooding and no channel staff around to help? please check with freenode support: http://freenode.net/faq.shtml#gettinghelp === DarkMageZ_ [n=richard@ppp59-167-20-38.lns2.syd7.internode.on.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === DarkMageZ__ [n=richard@ppp59-167-30-126.lns1.syd6.internode.on.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === DarkMageZ [n=richard@ppp59-167-30-126.lns1.syd6.internode.on.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === Admiral_Chicago [n=FreddyM@ubuntu/member/admiral-chicago] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === hjmf [n=hjmf@138.Red-83-45-117.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [09:26] morning! === cjwatson_ [n=cjwatson@82-69-40-219.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [09:35] morning hjmf [09:35] seems like we may need to redo a lot of the bugs because of the update to LP [09:36] have you seen the link? [09:50] Admiral_Chicago: I know about the update, but I haven't seen changes yet [09:50] Admiral_Chicago: which link? [10:06] \me 's afk === hjmf 's afk (*meant) [10:28] the email to bugsquad that is [10:39] Admiral_Chicago: I've seen your patch to HTMLOperations.py; against what version is it? [10:40] main in bzr [10:41] I said that because if you want you can also patch that branch [10:41] status_values = [ "Unconfirmed", "Needs Info", "Rejected", "Confirmed", [10:41] "In Progress", "Fix Commited", "Fix Released" ] [10:41] [10:41] in set_status() [10:42] Admiral_Chicago: and you'll get the credits :) [10:53] finally we have a small flame-fest too :) ... bug states === cjwatson [n=cjwatson@82-69-40-219.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [11:11] out to get some food [11:20] Admiral_Chicago: did you find out the command kmenu is using to launch -trunk? [11:22] firefox-trunk %u iirc [11:23] hmmmmmm [11:23] hjmf: let me check [11:24] it was against version: hmm. [11:24] latest version of bughelper [11:24] Admiral_Chicago: ill look into it later today [11:24] i forgot to do bzr up for lp-py-bugs [11:24] sounds good [11:26] Admiral_Chicago: yes, I thing you should patch the bzr version too :) [11:26] yea against latest revision in lp-py-bugs. [11:26] yep [11:26] what do you mean? [11:26] yes* [11:27] we are waiting on LP to actually update so that this could to work. [11:45] Admiral_Chicago: this issue is on feisty kde 3.5.7? [11:45] asac: granparadiso was pushed already or is this another upload? [11:45] grandparadiso is still in NEW [11:46] oh maybe because i installed it [11:46] !mozillatesting [11:46] Sorry, I don't know anything about mozillatesting - try searching on http://bots.ubuntulinux.nl/factoids.cgi [11:46] !mozillatest [11:46] Sorry, I don't know anything about mozillatest - try searching on http://bots.ubuntulinux.nl/factoids.cgi [11:46] ah that would me it [11:46] what wast the fact? [11:46] !moztest [11:46] The Mozilla-testing repos can be found at: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/PreviewArchives. Please remember these are testing repos, the packages in these repos are not stable and may break things on your system. Use with caution. Please report bugs found from these packages to: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/PreviewArchives/Bugs. [11:47] that one? [11:47] yeah :) [11:47] thanks [11:47] i might alias other triggers [11:47] gnomefreak: do we have -trunk in Preview ... or also granparadiso? [11:47] Admiral_Chicago: can you check what command kmenueditor is using to launch it [11:47] just trunk [11:48] asac: thats what i am trying to figure out atm [11:48] ok [11:48] isnt' really important [11:48] asac: maybe we should make a -kde-support package [11:48] gnomefreak: thats the idea ... yes [11:49] i will test granparadiso sometime today in kde [11:49] but there is noone with a clue ;) [11:49] its not running in kde [11:49] gnomefreak: shouldn't be much different in terms of kde integration [11:50] asac: Admiral_Chicago wont run in kde :( [11:50] I can imagine that Admiral_Chicago will not run in kde :) ... after all he is not binary ;) [11:51] so you say that firefox-trunk won't run at all? [11:51] even if started from command line? [11:53] asac: Admiral_Chicago can be what he might want to be (even binary) :-P [11:53] yeah ;) [11:53] morning guys [11:53] hjmf: morning [11:53] though its almost lunch here ;) [11:53] ... but thats when i start on Wed :) [11:53] asac: hehehe [11:54] so why are bug states still the same?= [11:54] have they reverted? [11:54] asac: it runs from CLI in kde but not menu or launcher [11:54] runs fine in gnome any way it starts [11:54] gnomefreak: so i guess there isn't a launcher in kde? [11:54] asac: I've played a bit with mozilla-mplayer plugin, here is the debdiff http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/26387/ [11:54] asac: he added it to kicker and command is firefox-trunk %u [11:55] as long as we don't have a kdefreak in our team, gnome is more important by definition :) === hjmf confess is a bit lost in many points [11:55] hjmf: let me see [11:55] agreed :) [11:55] e.g: do I need to edit the changelog file? [11:55] but i will do some testing sometime today while im waiting for apt fix [11:55] brb [11:56] hjmf: yes ... a changelog entry is good ... maybe a bit more explicit, but its definitly needed to request sponsored upload [11:56] asac: is that a merge? [11:56] or a sync, or nothing of the above? [11:56] hjmf: kind of ... a merge is always retroactive ... this is a *new* development [11:56] that people later have to keep when doing merges [11:57] ah [11:57] so ... its packaging improvemenent ... maybe call it wishlist bug fix [11:57] :) [11:57] hjmf: you should refer in the changelog to the spec [11:57] asac: ok [11:57] asac: I've just append the Xb-NSPlugin-XXX to the control file, is that right? or should be idented as the Description? [11:57] hjmf: Xb-... have to be in the binary package section [11:57] where did you add it? [11:58] (e.g. in the binary package section of the plugin package) [11:58] asac: just at the bottom: http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/26374/ [11:58] yes ... should be the right place ... i would add it before Description though [11:58] ok fixing it [11:59] don't think it matters ... you can test if it works: [11:59] install the plugin and see if apt-cache show displays those headers [11:59] ok I'll test it [11:59] last question, when I've built the source package for the debdiff I got an error about my gpg key [12:00] should I add my email in control? [12:00] or doesn't matter [12:00] hjmf: no ... it should ask for the key of the email in changelog [12:01] hmm [12:01] if you want to sponsor (e.g. its not your email that is last) ... you can add -kKEYID to dpkg-buildpackage [12:01] hjmf: your gpg key needs your email in the UID field [12:01] e.g. [12:01] asac@hector:~$ gpg --list-keys asac [12:01] pub 1024D/A824B93F 2003-08-15 [12:01] uid Alexander Sack [12:01] uid Alexander Sack [12:01] uid Alexander Sack [12:01] uid Alexander Sack [12:01] sub 4096R/9580ABA9 2006-11-15 [expires: 2007-07-13] [12:02] sub 4096R/140C6664 2006-11-23 [expires: 2008-05-16] [12:02] hjmf: anyway ... since you don't upload to a queue ... you don't need to sign for now :) [12:02] I ran debuild -S [12:02] what are you trying to build (sorry i rarely use debuild) [12:02] ? [12:02] binary or source package? [12:03] just the source package to get the dsc file for debdiff [12:04] don't worry I'll look in the man page [12:05] i run dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot to get both: source + binary [12:05] or dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -S to get only source [12:05] or dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -b to get only binary [12:06] but then ... i am an old guy ... and maybe debuild is really better ;) [12:06] asac: OK I'll try that (I'm open to changes as this is my first time) [12:06] :-P [12:06] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FirefoxDistroAddonSpec ... [12:07] look i started the headers with XB- [12:07] maybe thats the right way ... and not Xb- ... must be some reason i did that in the spec [12:07] i am soure there was a wiki page about custom dpkg headers [12:07] sure [12:08] but i can't find it atm [12:09] ok I'll change to XB [12:09] yes i think so ... at least http://wiki.debian.org/DebianPython/NewPolicy ... uses XS- ... and XB- [12:09] ah OK [12:10] hjmf: ok ... lets s/NSPlugin/NP/ and s/Xb/XB/ ... thne [12:10] all looks good [12:11] though i think that we can drop like s/[{}] // [12:11] in the app-id field [12:12] so XB-NP-MimeType: .... [12:12] right? [12:12] i think so yes :) [12:13] oh use NPP ... thats how the client API is called for NP host === gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [12:14] Admiral_Chicago: where do i find kmenueditor? [12:15] ... fixing [12:16] found it [12:16] asac: OK http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/26395/ [12:17] asac: check the changelog entry [12:17] is it enough clear? [12:17] btw I'm getting these warnings: [12:18] dpkg-source: warning: Version number suggests Ubuntu changes, but Maintainer: does not have Ubuntu address [12:18] dpkg-source: warning: Version number suggests Ubuntu changes, but there is no XSBC-Original-Maintainer field [12:18] the firs one is OK, [12:18] but the second one? === gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [12:24] hjmf: oh ... was mplayer in sync? [12:24] e.g. didn't have a ubuntu version? [12:24] ah ... its ok === cjwatson_ [n=cjwatson@82-69-40-219.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [12:24] asac: according the changelog there is mplayerplug-in (3.31+main-1ubuntu1) feisty; urgency=low [12:25] did you change maintainer or something? [12:25] that's why I put 3.31+main-1ubuntu2 [12:25] asac: no, I just added the changelog [12:25] yes ... thats ok [12:25] at debian/control I just add our tags [12:25] then its fine ... what is in maintainer field? [12:25] Maintainer: Ari Pollak [12:26] no XSBC? [12:26] interesting [12:26] no [12:27] who did last upload? [12:27] in changelog? [12:27] ... looking [12:28] asac: Adrien Cunin Tue, 16 Jan 2007 23:09:42 +0100 [12:28] ok ... so mplayer is from multiverse or from universe? [12:30] asac: multiverse [12:30] i asked ari (waiting for reply) ... i guess we will have to move him to XSBC-Original-Maintainer field and add MOTU or something to maintainer [12:31] asac: ok I'll wait before creating the bug report then === ubuntu_laptop [n=ubuntu_l@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [12:31] asac: ah, the application ids I add where just firefox and seamonkey. I thought that that was enough [12:32] s/where/were [12:32] hjmf: yes i think its enough ... for now. haven't received an embedded movie in mail so far ... so i have no idea if it would even work in tbird ;) [12:32] but probably it might work :) [12:32] yeah :-) [12:33] or html mail with embedded movie (with external URL) ? [12:33] omg where are the old text email times !!! [12:33] hehe yes ... which is why i have no idea :) [12:33] :) [12:34] I don't like html formated emails even [12:35] yeah ... i use mutt ... so :) [12:36] thats odd my keys arent working on laptop :( [12:36] not that far, I used to use it, but now I use evolution but for editing I use vi [12:36] gnomefreak: yeah ... unlikely, but possible :) [12:36] evo + vi ? interesting [12:36] the p key and the / keys for sure are nt working [12:37] are ... those keys :) ... i thought about gpg keys [12:37] gnomefreak: maybe you have some wierd language setting on your keyboard? [12:37] hmmmm i will look when it boots === ubuntu_laptop [n=ubuntu_l@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [12:43] heya asac [12:43] :) [12:43] hi [12:43] how it's going? [12:44] better than a few hours ago :) [12:44] :D [12:44] 20 mins and I have to go to work again [12:44] :/ [12:44] bluekuja: what are you working? [12:45] a33 2eys w5th 06re than 6ne char 5ts 4s5ng the a3ternate char n6t what 5t sh643d be [12:45] asac: summer work [12:46] asac: I do it for one month only [12:46] after finishing school [12:46] k [12:47] that should read all keys with more than one char its using the alternate char not what it should use [12:47] asac: later we will talk about packages [12:47] ;) [12:47] gnomefreak: you have a bad keyboard setting [12:48] thats not good :( [12:49] somehow debconf video streams are down :/ [12:51] asac: where do you get them? [12:51] i don't ... i looked that them sonday monday night where nothing was going on ... now i wanted to take a look and they are gone [12:52] :D [12:52] http://streams.video.debconf.org:8000/ [12:52] that was the place [12:52] but there is nothing in "icecast" [12:52] at least i don't see them ;) [12:53] yeah [12:53] maybe you can see non-live in the archives: http://meetings-archive.debian.net/pub/debian-meetings/2007/debconf7/ [12:53] can't see them too [12:53] cool1 [12:53] ! [12:54] ****** [12:54] n6 34c2 [12:56] cya later [12:56] good work to everyone [12:56] :) [12:56] maybe something got messed up when i used keyboard with it [12:57] 3Dcya [12:57] bluekuja: have fin [12:57] thanks [12:57] fun [12:57] ^^ [12:58] i guess im getting a keyboard for it [12:58] yeah [01:02] bbs [01:25] gnomefreak ... do you still have a bzr package in your gutsy apt-cache? [01:25] some 0.16something version [02:08] gnomefreak: does flashplugin-nonfree work for you in chroot? [03:31] asac: this is how apt-cache shows the tags http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/26423/ [03:32] asac: notice that doesn't mind if the tag is XB-NPP or Xb-Npp as per: [03:32] dpkg-genchanges: warning: unknown information field `Xb-Npp-Mimetype' in input data in package's section of control info file [03:32] It takes it as Xb-Npp-xxxx [03:32] I'll still be around for some minutes [03:39] bzr package? [03:39] ah no i dont [03:39] asac: ^^ is .17 borked? [03:40] hjmf: looks good [03:40] asac: and what chroot are we talking about? [03:40] hjmf: can you replace s/[{}] //g ? [03:41] gnomefreak: your gutsy chroot :) [03:41] ill check [03:41] 0.17 builddeb has not yet been updated ... so i cannot build as easy as i would like :) [03:41] asac: in the app ids, yes [03:42] asac: ah yes we bzr upgrade removed bzr-something maybe a week or so ago [03:42] gnomefreak: right [03:42] i asked ari (waiting for reply) ... i guess we will have to move him to XSBC-Original-Maintainer field and add MOTU or something to maintainer [03:42] asac: I'm waiting for that [03:42] me too [03:42] :) [03:42] asac: meanwhile If have time I'll do other plugins [03:43] oh i should have bzr .16 in chroot :) [03:43] asac: yeah! its that I'm slow typing :) [03:44] want me to grab the deb for you and upload it somewhere (if i can) [03:44] gnomefreak: no ... just want to know if it works for you ... later would be great to test [03:46] here we go again [03:47] someone without a clue is triaging ffox bugs [03:49] how is that news :) [03:49] but i think it should be safe ... i still read all bugmail [03:50] lol he reported it and marked it upstream debian [03:50] oh ... i try to at least ;) [03:50] but he didnt mean to i think [03:50] yeah [03:50] i just assigned it to team [03:54] flash works fine in gutsy chroot in firefox [03:54] hjmf: maybe bug 85238 [03:54] Launchpad bug 85238 in firefox "[EDGY] firefox crashed -- maybe rel. realplayer (dup-of: 76608)" [Undecided,Rejected] https://launchpad.net/bugs/85238 [03:54] Launchpad bug 76608 in firefox "MASTER [@g_timeout_dispatch] [@nsAppShell::Run] " [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/76608 [03:55] shows that the master is realplayer related? [03:56] there is a testcase attached to bug 106199 [03:56] Launchpad bug 106199 in firefox "[feisty] 50% of cpu when a page is waiting to load" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/106199 [03:59] i added the testcase to summary ... maybe someone can be "tester" :) [03:59] asac: maybe its fixed somehow now (bug 76608) since we dont have dups since #94834 (Mar 22) [03:59] Launchpad bug 76608 in firefox "MASTER [@g_timeout_dispatch] [@nsAppShell::Run] " [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/76608 === ubuntu_laptop [n=ubuntu_l@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [04:00] I'll test that test case [04:01] hjmf 13572 7.2 3.1 108144 33112 pts/4 Sl+ 16:01 0:01 /usr/lib/firefox/firefox-bin file:///tmp/test.html -a firefox [04:02] asac: nothing special ^^ [04:02] even if I write through the fifo [04:07] ill be working on -trunk+kdemenu to see what issue is for the most part (adept and debtags are still on to do list) [04:08] lol @ libqt3-mt 3:3.3.8really3.3.7-0ubuntu5 [04:08] !info libqt3-mt feisty [04:08] libqt3-mt: Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime version), Version 3. In component main, is optional. Version 3:3.3.8really3.3.7-0ubuntu5 (feisty), package size 3221 kB, installed size 8916 kB [04:11] hjmf: interesting [04:11] gnomefreak: do you still have the "slow" machine at hand? [04:11] to test the CPU bug [04:11] Bug 16465 [04:11] Launchpad bug 16465 in firefox "Firefox eats up all the CPU with certain pages" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/16465 [04:11] is another [04:11] i have a slow pc at hand [04:11] maybe we should merge them all [04:13] hjmf: what frequency of reports did we have before? are they from feisty only (for which there is no auto-submission anymore)? [04:13] asac: looking... [04:13] 2.7 [04:14] maybe one dupe every 2 weeks or so [04:14] 2.7% is about normal or better than normal opening a page [04:14] hmmm and most are edgy crashes from what i see [04:14] gnomefreak: 2.7 ? ... but is there change in cpu usage if you stop ffox? [04:14] i mean ... stop the load [04:15] that is top CPU% while opening i assume since he put it in bug [04:15] or is 2.7 baseline for ffox on that machine in any case [04:15] gnomefreak: what is average [04:15] ... btw, the opening should not stop [04:15] automatically [04:16] PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 5352 root 19 0 204m 26m 4748 R 85.2 2.7 2:57.95 Xorg 7240 berti 16 0 254m 49m 25m S 2.7 4.9 0:02.95 firefox-bin 5765 berti 15 0 142m 40m 20m S 2.0 4.0 0:59.21 konqueror [04:17] average IMHO is around 20-30% as we have seen in past [04:17] 20%? [04:17] how can it peak at 2.7 then? [04:18] sounds not consitent ;) [04:18] asac: 89601 90037 94834 are feisty (3/15) [04:18] !16465 [04:18] Sorry, I don't know anything about 16465 - try searching on http://bots.ubuntulinux.nl/factoids.cgi [04:18] asac: did you read the bug? they posted their op outputs [04:18] top [04:18] 3/16; feisty/edgy [04:18] my t key is borked :( [04:18] *feisty/total [04:18] damn I'm sleepy [04:19] bug 16465 [04:19] Launchpad bug 16465 in firefox "Firefox eats up all the CPU with certain pages" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/16465 [04:19] most of them stated this problem is no longer present but looking into it [04:20] 68.2% [04:20] 88 [04:21] max CPU is 89.7 [04:21] thats way too high [04:21] http://www.vu.lt/ivykiai_old/ is the link [04:21] gnomefreak: what are you trying? [04:21] k [04:22] open link read CPU in top [04:22] gnomefreak: in gutsy or where do you test? [04:22] 90.3 [04:22] thats feisty on a P2 300mhz around 300mb ram [04:23] its frigging anamated [04:23] animated [04:23] open page look on left the scroll stuff [04:24] 97.2 in gutsy on a p4 256mb ram [04:24] yeah i think its animation [04:24] i would have to say its site [04:24] is konqueror better for you? [04:24] can you try? [04:24] asac: gnomefreak if you want high cpu usage go to http://www.chutneymary.com/critics.htm and wait 30 seconds [04:24] dont know [04:24] from bug 113654 [04:24] Launchpad bug 113654 in firefox "http://www.chutneymary.com/critics.htm causes unresponsiveness in firefox, cpu usage goes to 100 percent" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/113654 [04:24] hjmf: dont want high [04:24] we should compare to konqueror [04:24] otherwise we have no valid benchmark [04:24] and just saying this feels too much is not proper imo [04:25] we have no valid benchmark anyway as konq uses khtml or something like that (the rendering engine) [04:25] trying [04:26] much lower than ff [04:26] highest it got was ~20% [04:27] its a gecko issue im assuming sinces its about rendering and its marked upstream [04:30] gnomefreak: can you try paradise or trunk? [04:30] only on p4 pc [04:30] there should be a lot of improvement i gues [04:30] s [04:30] gnomefreak: not on slow one? [04:30] gnomefreak: why can't you install? [04:31] asac: im installing it on slow one atm with kubuntu-desktop [04:31] its gonna be a couple of hours [04:31] gnomefreak: oh ... why not just firefox-trunk :) [04:31] to give it a quick test [04:31] asac: to fix the bug Admiral_Chicago found? [04:32] no ... to see if the CPU performance has improved (which it should) [04:32] its about half of what other ff was doing [04:32] highest it got here was 56% [04:33] but leveled out around 30-40 [04:33] 38.8% [04:33] thats granparadiso in gutsy [04:34] about 1hour 20 minutes left than i can test [04:34]