[05:57] <TheSheep> you guys have seen this? http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2502875508327767830
[06:05] <nothlit> what accent does she have? its curious
[06:12] <nothlit> wow, his chosen websites aren't very nice
[06:13] <TheSheep> he didn't spend a lot of time on chosing :)
[11:40] <klepas> moin
[07:02] <troy_s> That's a great link.
[08:35] <nothlit> lol, whats new in there compared not already known or learned by composition
[08:48] <troy_s> nothlit: It is just an interesting take on it.  I find most of it quite foolish actually and ill researched.  He restricted his "study" to westernized thinking and examples.  He should have done a little art history before making those claims.
[09:06] <troy_s> nothlit: Most of what he comes to conclusion on is learned history based on post-ren thinking -- aka Phi and all of its implications.  It also fails to take into account historical context, thematic context, and a few other massive factors.
[09:36] <nothlit`alpha> lol, it wasn't really researched at all, he seems to think his [very biased and personal]  suppositions are groundbreaking, as well as his findings
[09:37] <nothlit`alpha> i find it interesting that he says hes a photographer/looked deeply into this stuff, because its obvious he has no grounding
[09:39] <nothlit`alpha> i think articles colour theory/composition would be far more articulate, and efficient to link to
[09:46] <troy_s> nothlit`alpha: Yeah... like I said, it gets a +1 for at least trying.  -6 for being rather foolish in pursuit / scope / understanding.
[12:03] <BHSPitLappy> Why does the ubuntu.com tour of ubuntu show Dapper screenshots?