=== Starting logfile irclogs/ubuntu-mozillateam.log === ubuntulog [i=ubuntulo@ubuntu/bot/ubuntulog] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === Topic for #ubuntu-mozillateam: Home of Ubuntu Mozilla Team - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam | Bug Triagers please read: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/ | Firefox trunk package source : https://code.launchpad.net/~asac/firefox/trunk | Mailing List: ubuntu-mozillateam@lists.ubuntu.com | === Topic (#ubuntu-mozillateam): set by Admiral_Chicago at Sun Jun 24 10:33:47 2007 [08:49] hjmf_: you're not subscribed to the MT ML? [08:50] I am, but I did a mistake with the sender email :-P === hjmf [n=hjmf@81.Red-217-125-221.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [09:00] ...I've sent now the message with the right sender email :) [09:28] asac: you here yet? [09:28] yeah [09:28] just arrived :) [09:29] asac: the updates for plugins for ff tell you when you try to open ff? [09:29] its 3:30am please forgive the confusing parts [09:30] gnomefreak: extensions yes [09:31] greasmonkey just did [09:31] gnomefreak: plugins ... not sure if those auto-update at all [09:31] gnomefreak: yeah greasemonkey is an extension [09:31] scared me [09:31] not a plugin [09:31] ah ok [09:31] it said plugin on hte update dialog [09:31] the [09:32] hmm [09:32] can't tell ... greasemonkey is definitly not a plugin ... maybe it said 'Add-on' :) [09:33] yeah anyway ... apparently greasemonkey released a new version [09:33] yeah they did [09:33] maybe it did say add on [09:34] bug 122059 [09:34] Launchpad bug 122059 in network-manager "Added Leap Support plus fixes" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/122059 [09:38] gnomefreak: does firefox in gutsy have a 'report a bug' menu entry? [09:38] yes [09:38] in help [09:39] brb needs smoke [09:40] hjmf: can you add a GPL copyright header to the top of the firefox.py file? [09:40] with yourself as the copyright owner? [09:40] asac: doing now :) [09:42] hjmf: do you want it to add it to the package on your own (e.g. put to debian/ directory and install the file to proper place in debian/firefox.install [09:42] ? [09:43] (i can do that too) :) [09:44] hjmf: if you want to do on your own, just do it on ~mozillateam branch or ... use your private bzr branch. I can then easily cherry-pick that checkin to my branch [09:44] asac: I don't have the sources for that, so please do it [09:44] k [09:45] asac: ok then :) [09:45] just upload the new file to the bug === Admiral_Chicago [n=FreddyM@adsl-68-255-102-60.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [09:48] asac: done [09:48] hjmf: great! [09:50] asac: Author: Hilario J. Montoliu is OK? [09:50] or do I need to explicit say copyright [09:50] ? === hjmf doubts [09:51] yeah its not enough :) ... you have copyright [09:51] let me find an example [09:53] just replace s/Author:/Copyright 2007/ [09:54] ok then, fixing [09:56] fixed :) [09:57] hjmf: have you tested what happens in case you through an exception/error in the add_report method? [09:57] can bug report still be filed or does apport choke and prevent user to submit report? [09:57] (in the latter case I have to more careful to include a hook ... e.g. thorough review) [09:57] might want to do a try. else: don't attach [09:58] don't attach extension that is... === Admiral_Chicago can't think clearly [09:58] i'll see you all in the morning [09:59] hehe ... yeah ... i trust you enough when you say: apport goes on an the report might not be attached :) [09:59] asac: yes apport does it's job even if the script fails :) [09:59] which it doesn't by the way :) [09:59] blah, just close all the bugs in Ubuntu and say their fixed [09:59] good ... then there is not much reason to push this in this upload [09:59] out of sight, out of mind. [09:59] yeah [10:00] hjmf: yes ... just want to be sure ... things can have bugs ... even scripts by you : [10:00] :) [10:00] sure :) [10:01] the flaw part is the xml parsing, but if it fails the script doesn't break as the exceptions are handled [10:01] or that's what I hope :-P [10:02] hjmf: ok so you need cStringIO.StringIO() ... instead of just a string? [10:02] otherwise attachment gets chopped off? [10:02] asac: that's the only way [10:02] but doesn't buffer.read() ... just return a string? === wigfreitz [n=andrew@81-86-251-23.dsl.pipex.com] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [10:03] do you understood why it failed in the beginning? [10:03] yes, but some how better formated because of unicode stuff [10:03] hi ho, are you guys supporting the new flash plugin? I have some bugs Id like to report [10:04] wigfreitz: just tell us in a few words, so we can say if they are worth a bug report :) [10:04] asac: I'm going to try an un-handled exception in my script to check if apport goes on as it should [10:04] hjmf: yeah ... if you find it breaks let me know ... otherwise this will go up later today [10:05] asac: I'll do some checks and I'll tell you [10:05] great [10:05] Ill just upload the screenshot [10:05] k [10:08] http://www.moonet.co.uk/snapshot5.png [10:08] this is whilst running xgl [10:10] have you found a opengl setup that works? [10:10] e.g. some xorg.conf tweaks maybe? [10:10] or other driver? [10:10] wigfreitz: btw, what version of gnash do you use? [10:12] 0.8.0 [10:13] I get this effect whilst scrolling [10:13] (the browser) and when a flash element is loading I get this pattern for a fwe seconds [10:15] & you tube doesn't work properly [10:15] :-) [10:16] asac: confirmed, it is safe, apport does the default stuff even if my script dies badly [10:16] wigfreitz: does it work if yousign back on without xgl? [10:16] e.g. bug 122070 [10:16] wigfreitz: ok ... if you tube doesn't work I would blame opengl ... we are trying to shift to use something else for next upload ... so stay tuned [10:16] Launchpad bug 122070 in firefox "apport hook test - error 3" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/122070 [10:17] hjmf: fine [10:17] so enigmail is broken for everyone? [10:17] (e.g. except gutsy) [10:18] gnomefreak: Ill try sans xgl === wigfreitz [n=andrew@81-86-251-23.dsl.pipex.com] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [10:22] asac: good timing [10:22] gnomefreak, it works better, but some elements do not load or are displayed incorrectl [10:22] asac: im backporting final tb .4 release to preview i guess ill spin enigmail as well :) [10:23] gnomefreak: & youtube is still mangled [10:24] wigfreitz: some work or non work on youtube? [10:25] nothing works on youtube [10:25] wigfreitz: 32bit or 64bit? [10:26] wigfreitz: are you getting Internal Server Error [10:27] nevermind that was just that one [10:27] wigfreitz: what video card/driver do you use? [10:27] fglrx [10:28] i cant watch them either [10:28] hang on, lemme just compile all the info [10:28] this is new since it worked last week === gnomefreak on gutsy [10:29] give me a few minutes while download finishes [10:32] works here [10:32] gutsy 32bit nvidia [10:32] guys, here is uname and xorg.0.log http://rafb.net/p/Vvw6HG84.html [10:33] wigfreitz: 2.6.20-15-generic does -16 not work for you? [10:33] It would seem not [10:34] wigfreitz: 64bit or 32? [10:34] 64 [10:34] asac: can you confirm this behavour? [10:35] http://www.moonet.co.uk/snapshot5.png [10:38] wigfreitz: did you try klash instead of gnash? [10:38] no [10:39] its build in same package klash == kde version of gnash [10:39] :) [10:39] aha [10:39] I shall give that a go === gnomefreak doesnt know if it will make a differnece [10:39] wigfreitz: what options have you set for your fglrx driver in your xorg? [10:41] http://rafb.net/p/0GByMe63.html [10:42] wigfreitz: thats wierd because i have the same setup :) [10:43] though i have this in my device section: [10:43] Section "Device" [10:43] # Driver "vesa" Identifier "ATI Technologies, Inc. ATI Default Card" Driver "fglrx" Option "DesktopSetup" "clone" Option "UseInternalAGPGART" "yes" Option "TexturedVideoSync" "on" Option "VideoOverlay" "off" Option "OpenGLOverlay" "off" [10:43] EndSection [10:43] ups [10:43] :) [10:43] http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/27102/ [10:43] wigfreitz: ^^^ [10:43] maybe try one of these options [10:44] or all ;) [10:48] omg ... bzr-builddeb is updated in gutsy chroot ... hopefully it doesn't break things again :/ [10:49] uff ... appears to work :) [10:54] asac: is there a reason we didnt use ~mt1 for enigmail in the preview archive? [10:55] dunno ... what did we use? [10:55] ~mtX should be used nowadays [10:55] nothing just the version [10:55] hmm [10:55] which is latest in there [10:55] ?= [10:55] ouch :) [10:55] im updating it to ubuntu3 and ill add ~mt [10:56] 0.95.0-0ubuntu1 [10:56] hmmm ... no idea :) ... should have been ~mt1 [10:56] ok well ill add it this time [10:56] maybe fix it if you upload next time [10:56] gnomefreak: why do you rebuild? [10:56] is there a new package available? [10:57] isnt there a klash mozilla pluin? [10:57] asac: no just ubuntu3 now. you stated above its borked in feisty but not gutsy so i figured i would try gutsys latest on tb2.0.0.4 final in feisty see if it fixes problems for them [10:58] wigfreitz: yes there should be [10:58] wigfreitz: sorry no [10:59] wigfreitz: there is a konqueror-plugin [10:59] but there is a klash_0.8.0 package [10:59] + libs [11:00] aha, but if I want to play vids in firefox in kde Im a bit stuck? [11:00] wigfreitz: firefox is always gnash plugin [11:00] konqueror is klash [11:01] gnomefreak: gnomefreak i didn't refert to preview archive enigmail ... but to official package [11:01] oh, okay [11:02] wigfreitz: did you try to add the options? [11:02] wigfreitz: http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/27102/ [11:02] let me know if those help [11:08] gnomefreak: anyway ... getting latest enigmail to feisty preview is good as well ;) [11:08] asac: Im just doing so [11:08] should I replace my section completely? [11:10] BusID "PCI:1:5:0" <- which boils down to this line [11:12] he i soff === asac wonders if his X stopped to start now [11:16] tse ... network-manager appears to be more or less minor desaster in gutsy [11:16] someone merged it ... but just dropped patches [11:16] so hell broke loose [11:17] bad thing: i have the feeling that people expect me to fix this now [11:17] before tribe-2 :( [11:24] !info enigmail feisty [11:24] Package enigmail does not exist in feisty [11:25] !find enigmail [11:25] Found: mozilla-thunderbird-enigmail, enigmail-locale-ca, enigmail-locale-cs, enigmail-locale-de, enigmail-locale-el (and 16 others) [11:25] !info mozilla-thunderbird-enigmail feisty [11:25] mozilla-thunderbird-enigmail: Enigmail - GPG support for Mozilla Thunderbird. In component main, is optional. Version 2:0.94.2-0ubuntu1 (feisty), package size 317 kB, installed size 1396 kB === gnomefreak wonders if we shouldnt try to get backport to feisty [11:27] asac: btw the changelog in gutsy's enigmail is wrong [11:28] asac: Tue, 15 May 2006 10:59:00 +0200 should be 2007 === wigfreitz [n=andrew@81-86-251-23.dsl.pipex.com] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [11:36] asac, those additions to xorg.conf didnt seem to make any difference [11:38] wigfreitz: ok thanks ... then lets see if switching away from opengl to agg will help. [11:38] wigfreitz: thanks for your feedback [11:38] stay tuned [11:38] np [11:39] Ill keep updating then [11:39] what is the new reject for LP now? invaild? [11:42] i found out, it is === gnomefreak thinks nap until 8 while enigmail and tb build [11:51] gnomefreak: rest well [11:51] ill try ty [12:11] oh no ... enigmail doesn't build in feisty anymore ... what happened :( [12:14] wierd ... i didn't have latest tbird ... anyway ... it should build imo [12:14] lets see [12:14] if lastest feisty tbird cures this issue [12:23] asac: doesnt build due to build-dep thunderbird (<< 2.0.0.0.0) [12:23] if you mean 0.95 [12:26] after changing build-dep it builds fine here on feisty [12:26] so far atleast [12:28] heya guys [12:28] asac: :) [12:28] yeppers built fine here [12:29] asac: what can we do for that autogen in rules? [12:30] he? [12:30] gnomefreak: no ... the current feisty enigmail doesn't build in feisty [12:30] asac: it fails to build [12:30] gnomefreak: which scares me a lot [12:30] ah [12:30] will have to look into this later again :) ... i appear to miss the obvious [12:30] asac: make: ./autogen.sh: Command not found [12:31] asac: what is failing? [12:31] bluekuja: why would it not exist? [12:31] bluekuja: its in the orig.tar.gz === gnomefreak can look at it in a bit and see if its something simple ;) [12:31] take a look [12:31] asac: I use 0.8.* release [12:31] new one [12:32] I pushed in ubuntu debian dir [12:32] and started to build [12:32] gnomefreak: don't think you can find it ... it might be that it just builds fine for me ... if you want to help, please verify that it really fails to build [12:32] bluekuja: why new one? [12:32] asac: i will [12:32] bluekuja: don't use new orig tarball [12:32] bluekuja: the tarball should be fine [12:32] asac: what gnash orig should I use then? [12:33] bluekuja: use everything from ubuntu [12:33] nothing from debian [12:33] ok then [12:33] gonna branch [12:33] bluekuja: from gutsy [12:33] bluekuja: use the gutsy orig :) [12:33] and the gnash branch [12:33] from launchpad [12:33] ok [12:35] asac: what was branch link? [12:35] :) [12:36] ok found [12:36] look in my code home: http://code.launchpad.net/~asac [12:38] thanks [12:39] oh ... its in core-dev :) [12:39] look in my code home: http://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev [12:39] branched [12:40] added configure variables [12:40] building [12:42] gnomefreak: crazy ... it just builds in pbuilder [12:42] thus, my feisty chroot appears to be broken [12:42] remake it :( === gnomefreak making a 2nd feisty one soon [12:43] one for preview and one for testing [12:47] ok im gone for a little while, im not feeling real great today [12:52] asac: leaving for work again...package is building [12:52] when I'm back, we have results [12:52] I hope it will be everything ok [12:53] so we can push libagg [12:53] ;) [12:53] cya later === wigfreitz [n=andrew@81-86-251-23.dsl.pipex.com] has left #ubuntu-mozillateam [] [01:43] gnomefreak: interestingly it really builds after setting up feisty chrrot from scratch again === asac wonders what happened to my feisty chroot :/ [01:44] depends what it was failing on but only thing that comes to mind is depends issue (did you upgrade new chroot to latest? [01:48] yeah [01:48] nevermind [01:49] the old chroot is gone so no way to investigate closer :) [01:53] im out for a bit again while i upload packages [01:57] k === swarna [n=swarna@203.129.255.178] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [02:11] Hi,I am trying to create ubuntu package for firefox-2.0.0.4 but i am getting an error related to nsFontMetricsPSPango .cpp [02:11] somebody please help me in solving this [02:19] Is anyone here [02:22] gnomefreak: is granparadiso in moztest? [02:22] yes [02:23] gnomefreak: so i need to push amd64? [02:23] or did i already do that? [02:23] you need to afaik [02:23] gnomefreak: you wanna post info about preview archive here: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php [02:23] ups [02:23] http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=481470&page=3 [02:23] they appear to try to build for feisty [02:23] a lot [02:24] i will push amd64 [02:24] gnomefreak: btw, what happened to mozilla emblem in forums? [02:24] swarna: why do you want to do that? [02:25] asac, I have added a patch to the source to get proper tamil printing [02:25] asac, It has compiled properly,the problem is while packaging only [02:25] swarna: yeah ... don't do your own packages [02:26] swarna: either build from our bzr tree [02:26] or modify what you got with apt-get source [02:26] we cannot really support people trying to package on their own [02:26] if they don't base on what we did [02:27] asac, i am not creating my own package but trying to make firefox to support tamil printing [02:28] so what did you do ... and what is failing now? [02:29] gnomefreak: did you push your paradiso changelog to mozillateam branch or something? [02:29] ../../dist/lib/components/libgfxps.a(nsFontMetricsPSPango.o):/root/Desktop/iceweasel/iceweasel-2.0.0.4/gfx/src/ps/nsFontMetricsPSPango.cpp:2034: first defined here [02:29] yeah you are build iceweasel [02:30] and you didn't answer my question [02:30] asac, yes [02:30] 14:28 < asac> so what did you do... [02:30] I have taken the source from debian [02:30] k [02:30] and? [02:30] I am getting the above error [02:31] if you don't answer my question, then i can't really help :) [02:31] asac: i think i did [02:31] < swarna> I have taken the source from debian + I am getting the above error [02:31] positive i did [02:31] I took the source added a patch and compiled it [02:31] thats almost certainly not all you did [02:32] swarna: try to compile without patch first [02:32] it is working if i install from source [02:32] asac,but if i try to package it i am getting error [02:32] swarna: 1st. never build as root [02:33] 2nd ... test if all works without applying your patch [02:33] if it doesn't there is a point to take a look [02:33] asac, yes i have compiled without patch it is getting compiled [02:33] otherwise you might have missed to apply your changes to pango as well [02:33] since if you build default upstream, pango is not used [02:33] so make your patch build for pango as well and you are done :) [02:34] swarna: and please don't build as root [02:34] use dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot [02:34] asac, yes i have to make some changes i dont know what changes should be made and where [02:34] (install fakeroot package) [02:34] asac, yes i have used that command only [02:34] swarna: did you develop the patch?= [02:35] swarna: but you are building in /root/Desktop/iceweasel/iceweasel-2.0.0.4/gfx/src/ps/nsFontMetricsPSPango.cpp:2034 [02:35] which means that you build as root [02:35] you are even logged in as root (ouch) [02:35] asac, ok i'll change the user [02:35] should not make much difference .... but its much safer to go as non-privileged user [02:36] asac, ok [02:36] swarna: if you did not develop the printing patch then you are lost unless you know how to port that to pango [02:36] in that case ask patch developer to produce for pango as well [02:37] asac: is it gonna be a while until granparadiso 64bit is done? [02:37] asac, the patch is produced for pango also\ [02:37] swarna: so where is the patch from? [02:37] gnomefreak: just tell on forum that amd64 build will appear soon as well [02:37] gnomefreak: what version is in feisty preview? [02:38] asac, I got it from a redhat guy [02:38] gnomefreak: can you give me the changelog entry? [02:38] gnomefreak: unless you want to push your changelog entry to mozillateam branch or something [02:39] swarna: yeah ... i have really no idea ... and as long as i cannot see the patch i cannot help at all. [02:39] asac, can we should make changes in the source if we add a patch to it [02:39] swarna: if it builds without patch, but doesn't with the patch its definitly the patch that is broken [02:39] asac: firefox-granparadiso (3.0~alpha5-0ubuntu2~mt1) gutsy; urgency=low [02:39] gnomefreak: please the full entry [02:39] gnomefreak: so i can copy it on top of mine :) [02:39] gnomefreak: for the build [02:39] k [02:40] http://gnomefreak.pastebin.ca/588269 [02:40] swarna: i don't understand your last question [02:40] swarna: maybe rephrase [02:40] gnomefreak: ty [02:40] yw [02:41] asac, i am not able to send the patch can you please send me ur mail id [02:41] im gonna go ahead and update the release crap for repo while your building it, unless you want me to wait [02:41] shall i paste it in the pastebin [02:42] swarna: why can't you send the patch? [02:42] swarna: yes if you want ... at best tell me where you got that patch from [02:42] e.g. bugzilla.mozilla.org bug id [02:42] i think firewall [02:42] or bugzilla.redhat.com bug id [02:42] swarna: http://pastebin.mozilla.org/ [02:42] paste there [02:44] asac, http://pastebin.mozilla.org/106262 [02:46] swarna: so where is this patch in bugzilla? [02:46] swarna: it probably got updated [02:46] swarna: that patch may need to be updated [02:47] swarna: its for 1.5 ... and is most likely not compatible with 2.0.x [02:47] swarna: if you can find the bugzilla bugid, chances are high that there is a 2.0 patch [02:47] otherwise wait for 2.0 patch [02:48] asac, but the person who gave me the patch told that it is compatible for 2.0 also [02:48] swarna: who is that person? [02:48] and why did he gave you the patch [02:48] ask him for bugzilla bug id [02:48] instead [02:48] asac, he is a redhat person [02:49] really i cannot help you if you don't answer my questions [02:49] asac, ok i'll ask him for bug id [02:49] thanks [02:50] swarna: apparently its mozilla bug 357733 [02:50] Mozilla bug 357733 in General "Use Pango for printing" [Normal,Unconfirmed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=357733 [02:51] swarna: try to diff if you really have the latest [02:53] asac: btw you could have grabbed the source from the repo to build granparadiso [02:53] asac, are you telling that the bug which i sent now is bug 357733 [02:53] yes [02:53] and your patch is something else [02:53] at least its not a patch that is attached to it [02:54] which is why i asked you who send you this pach [02:54] ... as it more than obscure that a redhat guy that knows what he is doing doesn't send you the link to the bugzilla id [02:54] but instead he sends you a patch [02:55] gnomefreak: yeah ... i now build from what i have here ... i already had it lying around here [02:55]