/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2007/06/28/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

gnomefreakk ill start reading a little later :)12:32
asacyeah12:32
asacthe first is  a pretty good read12:32
asaci already learned some things :)12:32
gnomefreakok cool :)12:32
asacok night12:48
gnomefreaknight12:49
=== cjwatson_ [n=cjwatson@82-69-40-219.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
gnomefreak@schedule new_york02:42
ubotuSchedule for America/New_York: 28 Jun 11:00: Ubuntu Development Team | 29 Jun 07:00: MOTU Team | 03 Jul 15:00: Technical Board | 04 Jul 16:00: Edubuntu | 05 Jul 16:00: Ubuntu Development Team | 10 Jul 11:00: Kernel Team02:42
=== asac_ [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== asac_ [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
Admiral_Chicagoanyone have an idea about what to do about bug 8857304:20
ubotuLaunchpad bug 88573 in firefox "[feisty]  Firefox Crashed x86_64" [High,Incomplete]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/8857304:20
Admiral_Chicagoalso bug 11080204:44
ubotuLaunchpad bug 110802 in firefox "[feisty]  Firefox Crashed x86_64" [High,Incomplete]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/11080204:44
Admiral_Chicagoi think that could be rejected04:44
=== asac_ [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== shirish [n=shirish@59.95.37.101] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
shirishguys anybody up?05:40
shirishasac: you up m8?05:43
=== ubotu [n=ubotu@ubuntu/bot/ubotu] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== red_herring [n=rj@unaffiliated/redherring/x-220354] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== shirish [n=shirish@59.95.37.101] has left #ubuntu-mozillateam []
poningrugp/minefield is in universe right?07:11
poningruin gutsy I mean07:11
=== poningru assumes so
poningruplease correct in GutsyGibbon/Testing/Tribe2 if not07:12
Admiral_Chicagoponingru: it is07:17
poningruawesome thanks07:17
=== gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== AlexLatchford [n=alex@82-44-193-109.cable.ubr07.haye.blueyonder.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== gnomefreak needs to find some easy fix bugs today
gnomefreakif anyone runs across bugs like wrong depends or something fairly easy please let me know09:04
Admiral_Chicagoi'll keep an eye out09:07
gnomefreakAdmiral_Chicago: ty09:08
gnomefreakupdating java in the preview archive after a few requests09:08
gnomefreakall frigging night ive beem at it09:08
=== Admiral_Chicago [n=Freddy@adsl-68-72-103-252.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== Admiral_Chicago [n=FreddyM@adsl-68-72-103-252.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
gnomefreakasac: firefox-granparadiso-bin: /build/buildd/libcairo-1.4.8/src/cairo-hash.c:196: _cairo_hash_table_destroy: Assertion `hash_table->live_entries == 0' failed. that cant be good10:43
gnomefreakAdmiral_Chicago: bug 122737 im fairly sure that is the way it ships this early in devel.10:44
ubotuLaunchpad bug 122737 in firefox-granparadiso "No default search engines" [Undecided,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/12273710:44
asacgnomefreak: can you upgrade using feisty preview archive?11:03
asacfor me it removes almost everything11:03
asace.g. feisty archive is broken for amd6411:04
asaci cannot use dist-upgrade11:04
asacgnomefreak: i think i really need a list of what is not in amd64 archive11:21
asacand build that11:21
asacat least there is no firefox in there?11:21
gnomefreakis it because of nss and nspr -dev packages?11:26
asacyeah because of nss11:26
asacand we cannot really provide firefox then11:27
asacwithout respinning lots of things in the archive11:27
asacnevermind11:27
asaci think we have to accept that11:28
gnomefreakasac: gutsys ff should have stopped that no?11:28
asacno ... firefox still conflicts libnss311:28
asacand there is no real way out of this11:29
gnomefreakasac: what did we do for gutsy?11:29
asacnothing ... everything is respun against libnss3-0d11:29
gnomefreakcant i do that for preview as well or is it way too much11:29
asacso we don't have a problem11:29
asacbut i don't its feasible to do that for feisty archive11:30
gnomefreak:( i hate it that its like that but as you said when we first saw it that it will only affect building it so we left it that way11:31
asacis tribe-2 out?11:31
gnomefreakalmost11:31
asacout-of-freeze?11:31
gnomefreaklast i heard they were still testing maybe ~6 hours ago11:32
gnomefreakasac: no i think we are still frozen11:32
gnomefreakedubuntu-server needed testing last i heard11:32
asachmm11:32
=== gnomefreak hasnt slept yet so ive seen alot
asacok11:32
gnomefreaktopic in -devel says we are still frozen11:33
asachttp://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox:2.0.0.511:33
gnomefreakholy shit11:33
gnomefreakalready11:33
asachopefully we manage to backport it in time11:33
asacnot yet11:34
asacits just the schedule :)11:34
gnomefreaki would like to get that in preview as soon as we can (screw everyone else i want it) ;)11:35
=== gnomefreak thinks i can handle that though as long as i can use same rules file and stuff from .0.4
asacthere should be not much problems upgrading from .4 to .511:36
asacbut we need 1.5.0.x11:36
asacfor dapper11:36
gnomefreakbtw if i can get back onto a real sleep schedule i will start reading the merging pages again at 2am they made very little sense11:36
asacat least for this release11:36
asacoh11:36
asacok ... take your time11:37
asacget some rest11:37
gnomefreakasac: im gonna go through and see if i cant get some little fixes in (wroing depends or adding a patch or 3) but that is just so i can say i did something today and helpful for me to working with patches11:38
=== gnomefreak can use the practice with patches
asac;)11:39
gnomefreakbut finding them is hard there are alot of bugs out there ;) and naming patches is a bit well unknown to me atm so it will help me get the understanding on naming them, since i cant name the diff-config.dpatch11:40
asacyeah11:43
asacbug 8185811:43
ubotuLaunchpad bug 81858 in firefox "Digg.com slows down the browser" [Low,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/8185811:43
asacclaims that http://windyroad.org/software/wordpress/vistered-little-theme/11:43
asacscrolls smoothly on win11:43
gnomefreaklooking11:44
gnomefreaknot real smooth here11:44
gnomefreakkind of laggy/jerky11:45
gnomefreakwhat i mean by that is it moves a little stops than moves a little stops ......11:46
asacyes11:47
gnomefreaknow what i would like to know is how are they scrolling11:47
asache claims that its smooth on winxp11:47
=== gnomefreak doesnt have xp handy
asacme neither11:47
gnomefreakim not real conviced its 3D causing this, im more on the lines of X not the acctual drivers for cards (i bet you change it to vesa it does it as well11:51
gnomefreakdigg works fine for me11:51
gnomefreakok they must be using the arrows to scroll page11:52
asachmm11:53
gnomefreakits a bit choppy and slow using the slider arrows but wouse wheel and grabbing the slider and moving it work fine11:53
gnomefreakwhat does the scroll bar use? (not sure if you are gonna know what i mean but thinking isnt really great atm. i guess like is there a wrapper for opengl that would cause that or is the scrollbar a plugin built into package11:56
gnomefreaki guess what i mean is what is behind the way the arrows work on the scoll bar11:57
gnomefreakas for the first complaint i can not reproduce but there seems to be several complaints on this bug11:58
gnomefreakand at that time edgy/dapper we used pango as default and disabling it made pages load faster and not freeze as often so if that is still complaint try that11:59
asacimo that site is just shitty12:06
gnomefreakthat was my next guess is that content on site since it doesnt do it on all sites12:10
bluekujaheya guys12:40
bluekuja:)12:40
bluekujaasac: all of my packages are now in testing12:40
gnomefreakhi12:40
bluekujaheya gnomefreak12:40
bluekuja:)12:40
bluekujagnomefreak, how are you?12:40
gnomefreakbluekuja: tired and yourself?12:41
bluekujagnomefreak, really tired man, just finished working12:41
bluekujaand gonna leave again in 15 mins12:41
bluekuja:/12:41
gnomefreaki know the feeling :(12:41
bluekuja:)12:41
asacbluekuja: all? even those that are stilil in NEW?12:42
bluekujaasac: except the ones in NEW12:42
bluekujathat are still there12:42
bluekuja:/12:42
bluekujathe ftp-master that follows NEW is on holiday12:42
bluekuja:(12:42
bluekujaand gtorrent gonna move to testing too soon12:43
asacwho is the ftp-master that follows new?12:45
asaci thought there were at least a few12:45
bluekujaganneff12:45
asacganneff ... hmmm jeroen12:46
asacshould do it as well12:46
bluekujayeah12:46
bluekujabut it doesnt12:46
bluekuja^^12:46
asacis he gone as well?12:46
bluekujadont know12:46
bluekujathey said me12:46
bluekujaganneff is the only one12:46
bluekujathat follows NEW12:46
bluekujaI'm leaving again12:50
bluekujaasac: see you later12:50
bluekuja:)12:50
gnomefreakbug 11568712:52
ubotuLaunchpad bug 115687 in sun-java6 "java6 update1 is released, please update" [Low,Fix released]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/11568712:52
gnomefreakdamn12:52
gnomefreakasac: what do you want to do with bug 11965701:02
ubotuLaunchpad bug 119657 in firefox "There is no flash support in Firefox. (PowerPC)" [Wishlist,Incomplete]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/11965701:02
gnomefreakim not real confident that adobe is willing to port it for ppc as they have never done in past and there hasnt been a response on it in a while, do we have contacts at adobe bychance?01:03
asacgnomefreak: closed01:03
asacno we don't have contacts with adobe01:03
asacthey just don't care ... and honestly i don't care much as well01:04
asacfree-software will win in the end anyway ... so ...01:04
gnomefreakand has nspluginwrapper hit repos in gutsy? any plans to backport for feisty?01:04
asacnot now01:05
asacin gutsy it is ... yes01:05
gnomefreakclose bug 99352 or mark it as wishlist and see if we cant get it backported?01:06
ubotuLaunchpad bug 99352 in firefox "feisty+firefox+amd64+java=segfault" [Undecided,Incomplete]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/9935201:06
gnomefreakbug 10873301:07
ubotuLaunchpad bug 108733 in nspluginwrapper "flash losing clicks with desktop effects enabled" [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/10873301:07
gnomefreakhmmmmmm01:07
asacyeah ... its definitly desktop effects then01:07
gnomefreak108733 say it happens outside of d-e01:09
gnomefreaki just subscribed us to nspluginwrapper since its your project01:10
asacyeah sometimes flash doesn't get events01:10
asacbut thats no news01:10
asaci think that bug should be assigned to compiz01:10
asaci will add the target01:11
gnomefreakty01:11
asacdone01:12
asac...gone01:12
asac:)01:12
gnomefreak# - Check acroread5, something is missing while loading a PDF is bad in nspluginwrapper01:12
gnomefreakwe dropped acroread afaik01:12
gnomefreak!info acroread feisty01:12
ubotuPackage acroread does not exist in feisty01:12
asacacroread5 is 10 years old afaik01:12
asacwe can't support that01:13
gnomefreakasac: we dropped it due to upstream no support01:13
gnomefreaki would think it can be dropped from mkruntime.sh01:13
gnomefreakbug 121066 is what im looking at about that01:14
=== gnomefreak trying to clean up bugs that are on my list
ubotuLaunchpad bug 121066 in nspluginwrapper "mkruntime.sh script is invalid sh" [Undecided,Incomplete]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/12106601:14
gnomefreakthere is a crap load of them01:15
=== DarkMageZ [n=richard@238.101.233.220.exetel.com.au] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
gnomefreakmozilla is making me sick caring more about windows bugs than ours01:18
=== gnomefreak thought we fixed this, maybe ill test later
gnomefreakill brb im gonna test this bug as i thought it was fixed.01:25
asacbluekuja: wanna provide a debdiff for bug 12106601:31
ubotuLaunchpad bug 121066 in nspluginwrapper "mkruntime.sh script is invalid sh" [Undecided,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/12106601:31
=== gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
asacgnomefreak: maybe consider to provide a debdiff for bug 12106601:32
asacwould be a good motu work :)01:32
asacpatch is attached ... so you need just to assemble new package version with that patch01:32
asacand attach debdiff + subscribe ubuntu-universe-sponsors01:33
gnomefreakk looking01:33
gnomefreakasac: dont think i can01:35
gnomefreakbut give me a few to figure out01:36
gnomefreakoh well i guess ill try to grab it from packages.ubuntu01:37
gnomefreakasac: http://gnomefreak.pastebin.ca/593527  does that look sane?01:48
asacthats just a diff01:49
asacnot a debdiff01:49
asacgnomefreak: apt-get source nspluginwrapper01:49
asacthen make new version that has that patch01:49
asacthen debdiff original and new .dsc file01:49
gnomefreakasac: i have the source but i cant apt-get it or build anything01:50
asacthen thats the problem you have to figure out01:50
asacapt-get source should work01:50
asacfix your sources.list01:50
asacor something01:50
gnomefreakasac: i dont have 6401:50
asacah01:50
asacyeah ... but apt-get source should work anyway01:50
gnomefreakit doesnt01:51
asacsure ... i already did01:51
asacor?01:51
asachmm01:51
asacleave it alone01:51
gnomefreakE: Could not open file /var/lib/apt/lists/gb.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_gutsy_main_source_Sources - open (2 No such file or directory)01:51
asacthats something different01:51
asacyour apt cache is broken01:51
asacprobably you have removed the deb-src line from sources.list01:51
gnomefreaknope sources list is fine01:52
gnomefreakdeb-src http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ gutsy main restricted01:53
gnomefreakoh wait let me try something01:53
gnomefreakasac: wtf02:10
asacuniverse02:12
asacis missing02:12
gnomefreakasac: is there a reason you have build-dep libc6-dev-i386 and not just libc6-dev02:12
asac... nspluginwrapper is still in universe02:12
asacyes02:12
asacon amd64 we need i386 :)02:12
gnomefreakalso make: dh_testdir: Command not found02:12
gnomefreakmake: *** [clean]  Error 12702:12
asacthats the trick of nspluginwrapper02:12
asacyeah thats stupid error02:13
asactry to figure out02:13
asacyou don't have build-essential installed02:13
gnomefreaki should02:13
gnomefreakyep it is02:13
gnomefreakdh_clean -k is there02:15
gnomefreakunder clean there is dh_testdir dh_testroot dh_clean rm -f build-stamp and -$(MAKE) distclean02:17
gnomefreakhmmmm let me see if im missing something02:17
gnomefreakhmmm suggest dh-make but cant install that02:19
gnomefreaklooks like chroot was missing a bunch of build-deps so after they install ill try again but there are 2 i hope i dont need to do this02:23
gnomefreakasac: should i check the box on LP that says this attachment is a patch?02:39
asacwhy?02:41
gnomefreakits done and attached02:41
gnomefreakit has a box for "is this a patch"02:42
gnomefreakbut either way its attached i followed a wiki so if its wrong blame the wiki :)02:42
=== gnomefreak was missing devscripts :(
gnomefreakcrap i thought i added removed them due to bash not dash but oh well02:44
asaclet me see02:51
gnomefreakbug 12106602:52
ubotuLaunchpad bug 121066 in nspluginwrapper "mkruntime.sh script is invalid sh" [Undecided,Triaged]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/12106602:52
asaclooks good ... if it applies :)02:52
asacgnomefreak: do debdiffs always have this /tmp/.... in patchfile?02:53
asachow did you produce it?02:54
gnomefreakthat was the dir i was using'02:54
asacgnomefreak: no ... you should just use debdiff02:54
asac(e.g. instead of diff02:54
asac)02:54
gnomefreaki did02:54
asacreally? ... how?02:54
asacyou still have the command?02:54
gnomefreakdebdiff napluginwrapper.....ubuntu2.dsc nsplugin....ubuntu1.dsc > naplugin..debdiff02:55
gnomefreakshort version02:55
asacok02:56
asacso without /tmp/... ?02:56
gnomefreakright02:56
asacyou have both .dsc files in same directory?02:56
gnomefreakyes02:56
asack02:56
asacthen its probably fine02:56
asacok subscribe ubuntu-universe-sponsors :)02:57
asac@schedule berlin02:57
ubotuSchedule for Europe/Berlin: 28 Jun 17:00: Ubuntu Development Team | 29 Jun 13:00: MOTU Team | 03 Jul 21:00: Technical Board | 04 Jul 22:00: Edubuntu | 05 Jul 22:00: Ubuntu Development Team | 10 Jul 17:00: Kernel Team02:57
gnomefreakhttp://gnomefreak.pastebin.ca/59360902:57
gnomefreakthats it?02:58
asacyes02:58
gnomefreakk :)02:58
asacsubscribe universe-sponsors :)02:58
gnomefreakthat pastebin is what i had in dir02:59
gnomefreakboth?02:59
asache?02:59
asacboth what?02:59
asacjust universe sponsors02:59
gnomefreakubuntu-universe-sponsers or universe-sponcers03:00
gnomefreaki got it03:01
=== cjwatson_ [n=cjwatson@82-69-40-219.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
asacgnomefreak: maybe give credits to patch author in changelog as well03:07
gnomefreakso re do it?03:07
gnomefreakeasy enough03:08
asace.g. ...: applied patch by Anders Kaseorg <email@...> to fix blablabla03:08
asacgnomefreak: yes please03:08
asaccredits are important in a community of volunteers03:08
gnomefreakyou got it03:08
asacanders@kaseorg.com is his email03:08
gnomefreakok ty03:09
asacok all is open again03:13
asacnow let me think which steps to take next :/03:13
asachjmf_: you there?03:14
asacoh i appear to be still away :)03:15
asacgnomefreak: let me know when new debdiff is up ... i wanna push it :)03:16
gnomefreakk03:16
gnomefreakasac: its up03:17
gnomefreaklet me know if good03:17
gnomefreak@schedule new_york03:18
ubotuSchedule for America/New_York: 28 Jun 11:00: Ubuntu Development Team | 29 Jun 07:00: MOTU Team | 03 Jul 15:00: Technical Board | 04 Jul 16:00: Edubuntu | 05 Jul 16:00: Ubuntu Development Team | 10 Jul 11:00: Kernel Team03:18
gnomefreakim not real sure why /tmp/SYk0CBNi3i/nspluginwrapper   is there03:20
asacgnomefreak: looks good ... next time put the credits in the same line as the patch comment03:20
gnomefreakoh sorry03:20
asaci will tweak the comment i guess ... but will upload after eating a banana03:20
asac:)03:20
gnomefreak:)03:20
=== gnomefreak waiting to pass out i cant believe im still up ive been up for ~29 hours
=== gnomefreak goes for a drink and smoke
asacgnomefreak: sleep03:24
asacthe longer you are awake the more difficult it becomes to sleep03:24
gnomefreaki will i would like to get a few more things done or started than i will lay down03:27
gnomefreakasac: firefox-3.0a6pre.en-US.linux-i686.tar.bz203:39
gnomefreakis that pre alpha6 or is it 603:39
asacalpha6 or pre?03:39
asachmm03:39
asacis there an announcement on mozillazine?03:39
gnomefreaki didnt get one in email03:39
gnomefreakhttp://www.mozillazine.org/ not from the looks of it03:40
gnomefreaknope not from what i see im at the list archives and its not there03:42
asacgnomefreak: pushed03:43
asachttp://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/nspluginwrapper/ubuntu/03:43
asacpushed to bzr as well03:43
gnomefreakty04:12
gnomefreakget trunk started and im going to bed ill upload tonight or late this afternoon04:17
gnomefreakasac: devel meeting05:02
asacyeah05:02
asaci am in :)05:02
gnomefreakoh ok05:02
asacthanks for the reminder :)05:03
gnomefreakaah now i see you wave05:03
gnomefreakyw05:03
gnomefreakthis is how i sleep :(05:03
=== jerome_ [n=jerome@gra94-2-82-66-142-60.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
gnomefreakif at all possible can we try to push ffox2 into this point release, they are fairly far apart maybe 6month point releases and i would rather no have to throw it in any other time than during a point release. Ill be back later and fix trunk since it FTB05:14
=== hjmf [n=hjmf@81.Red-217-125-221.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
hjmfgood evening05:33
hjmfasac: would you think that bug 122726 is a dup of bug 9893805:45
ubotuLaunchpad bug 122726 in firefox "firefox crashed [@g_type_check_instance]  [@g_signal_emit_valist]  [@g_signal_emit] " [High,Incomplete]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/12272605:45
ubotuLaunchpad bug 98938 in firefox "MASTER Firefox Crashed [@IA__g_type_check_instance_is_a] " [High,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/9893805:45
hjmfthe pattern of the stacktrace is very symilar though the function names of the stacks aren't the same05:46
hjmfe.g05:46
hjmf g_type_check_instance, g_signal_emit_valist, g_signal_emit, gtk_widget_event_internal05:46
hjmfvs05:46
asachmm05:47
hjmf IA__g_type_check_instance, IA__g_signal_emit_valist, IA__g_signal_emit, gtk_widget_event_internal05:47
hjmfalso we have bug 9384105:48
ubotuLaunchpad bug 93841 in firefox "MASTER Firefox Crashed [@IA__g_type_check_instance] [@ IA__g_signal_emit_valist] " [High,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/9384105:48
asacPrevious frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)05:48
hjmfbut in ^^ the stacktrace is a bit different05:48
hjmfyes, those ones show that error05:48
asaci don't think we should take any retrace that has that message seriously05:48
hjmfhmm, corrupt stack then05:49
asacyes05:49
asaccan be anything05:49
hjmfwe should throw them away then05:49
asaceither its really corrupt stack05:49
hjmfonly 3 dups though05:49
asacor retrace / coredump problem05:49
hjmfk, will tag as invalid that master05:50
asaci think thats the right decision05:50
asachjmf: one might check if the line numbers make sense05:50
asace.g. does gobject.c:173705:50
asacreally invoke05:51
asacgtype.c:311505:51
asacaeh ... really invoke IA__g_type_check_instance_is_a05:51
asaci would say we should close it05:52
hjmfboth masters05:52
asacwe have enough crashes anyway05:52
asacboth masters?05:52
asaci only see one05:52
asacoh right05:52
asacbut bug 93841 doesn't have a dupe05:52
asacubotu: hello?05:52
hjmflooking I thought it had 305:52
hjmfyep one has 3 dups and the other 405:53
asacright i confused ... bug 12272605:53
asacdoesn't have a dupe05:54
hjmfmaybe we merge both in one to catch duplicates05:54
hjmfor doesn't make sense at all05:54
asacah there were 3 bugs  involved :)05:54
hjmfsince corrupt stack05:54
hjmfyes05:54
hjmf3 bugs ;)05:54
hjmfone new and both masters05:54
asacif they don't have similar use cases in summary (e.g. most use mplayer)05:54
asacthen we can close them05:54
hjmflooking05:54
asacwe will catch dupes too05:55
asacso if it really grows we can revive it at anypoint05:55
hjmfok05:56
hjmflooking at the summaries there is no relation between them05:56
hjmfeach one seems to happened w/o relation with each other05:57
bluekujaback05:57
bluekujaheya :)05:57
hjmfso..... closing them muahahahahaha! :)05:57
=== cjwatson [n=cjwatson@82-69-40-219.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== ubotu [n=ubotu@ubuntu/bot/ubotu] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== red_herring [n=rj@unaffiliated/redherring/x-220354] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
bluekujaasac: :) news?06:04
=== hjmf 's off to take some rest
bluekujaasac: leaving again, tell me when you gonna send the mail, cya later07:19
bluekuja:)07:19
=== JenFraggle [n=jen@host217-43-183-130.range217-43.btcentralplus.com] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== AlexLatchford [n=alex@82-44-193-109.cable.ubr07.haye.blueyonder.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
Admiral_Chicagoits AlexLatchford...09:01
Admiral_Chicagohey there JenFraggle09:01
JenFragglehi09:03
Admiral_Chicagohow is it going?09:03
Admiral_Chicagoalso, what are you currently working on?09:03
=== dotpavan [n=pavan@d00-129-24-143-178.dhcp.unm.edu] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
JenFragglethings are going well.  currently working on wiki09:06
Admiral_Chicagowhich one?09:06
JenFragglebeginner page09:07
Admiral_Chicagogot a link?09:07
JenFragglehaven't posted it yet, working on it locally first09:07
Admiral_Chicagoawesome09:09
JenFragglehow are things with you?09:09
Admiral_Chicagoi was busy with xubuntu release notes09:17
gnomefreakasac: is it just me or doesnt libpng suppport APNG?09:18
=== jerome_ [n=jerome@gra94-2-82-66-142-60.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
asacgnomefreak: you are right09:35
gnomefreakasac: i wish i was09:35
gnomefreakconfigure: error: --with-system-png won't work because the system's libpng doesn't have APNG support09:36
gnomefreakso either feistys libpng12-dev doesnt provide support for it or -trunk is really mucked up somewhere09:37
asachmm09:39
asaclet me eat first09:39
gnomefreaktake you rtime09:39
asack ten minutes ... have start laundry :(09:48
gnomefreakk09:48
asack09:53
asacsomehow available09:53
asacis new flash already in?09:53
gnomefreak9.0.31.0.4ubuntu209:54
Admiral_Chicagooh crap, I can test the new gnash...09:54
gnomefreakis that the new one09:54
gnomefreakAdmiral_Chicago: its the best release of gnash so far :)09:54
bluekujaasac: back09:55
bluekuja:)09:55
asacwhere is the amd64 build?09:56
asacbluekuja: hey09:56
asaci am also more or less back :)09:56
bluekuja:)09:56
Admiral_Chicagoi'm looking forward to free flash09:56
gnomefreakdont know i cant see tham afaik09:56
bluekujaasac; my post is going great! only you and laserjock need to post and MC can start09:57
asacAdmiral_Chicago: me too09:57
asacbluekuja: how do you know?09:57
Admiral_Chicagolots of gstreamer deps...09:57
Admiral_Chicagogrr.09:57
asacwhat is bad about gstreamer?09:57
bluekujaasac: usually two days to wait sponsors09:58
gnomefreakAdmiral_Chicago: you want sound?09:58
bluekujaand then they start09:58
Admiral_Chicagono, i don't need that :)09:58
asacwe decided to use it because its not crap like ffmpeg :)09:58
bluekujaasac: *usually*09:58
bluekuja:)09:58
asacbluekuja: i already chattet with dholbach09:58
bluekujaasac: oh great!09:58
bluekuja:)09:58
bluekujait's ok then09:59
bluekuja:)09:59
asacgood ... i will ask him tomorrow morning if i should send mail as well09:59
bluekujaok, you rock alex!09:59
bluekujagonna offer you some beers09:59
asacits so damn busted09:59
bluekujawhen I come there09:59
asaci uploaded the flashplugin nonfree package to get an amd64 build09:59
asacand now ... nothing10:00
asacnot tried10:00
asacnot in queue10:00
asacwhere is it?10:00
gnomefreakdid they know to have it built on 64?10:00
gnomefreakalthough it goes to new beofre it goes to build farm10:01
asache?10:01
asaci set Architecture: i386 amd64 in control10:01
asacgnomefreak: do i need to set this up manually?10:01
gnomefreakshoudlnt10:02
gnomefreakhmmm wonder why :(10:04
gnomefreakhttps://launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+queue?queue_state=3&queue_text=flashplugin-nonfree10:04
gnomefreakFiles:  4397d30dfe6380273100a8d540b48819 16772 contrib/web optional flashplugin-nonfree_9.0.31.0.4ubuntu2_i386.deb d00d7f9923525c4808836de0813493ca 9365 raw-translations - flashplugin-nonfree_9.0.31.0.4ubuntu2_i386_translations.tar.gz10:05
gnomefreakasac: only shows 38610:06
=== gnomefreak gonna assume that is why only 386 build.
gnomefreakhmm asac you didnt set it to 6410:10
gnomefreakatleast not from what im seeing10:11
gnomefreakasac: Architecture: i386_translations i386  (shouldnt 64 be in that line10:11
=== gnomefreak could be wrong but the 2 that are listed there built
asacgnomefreak: look at .dsc10:14
gnomefreakcant from here :( have to look for it10:15
hjmfI've been able to reproduce bug 11021210:17
ubotuLaunchpad bug 110212 in firefox "[FEISTY]  firefox crashed [@nsHTMLContainerFrame::CreateViewForFrame]  [@nsCSSFrameConstructor::BeginBuildingScrollFrame] " [High,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/11021210:17
gnomefreakasac: yeah you did but why didnt it show as you did on query10:17
asacno idea :910:18
asaci am trying to figure out10:18
gnomefreakmaybe it is soyez issue :(10:18
asacsoyuz10:18
asacyes10:18
gnomefreakthat too10:18
asacluckily soyuz main developer was my roommate in seville :)10:18
asacso when i get him i will figure out :)10:18
gnomefreak:)10:19
hjmf... probably that crash happens only in the site reported in the test case10:19
asacbut first i pinged "normal archive admin"10:19
asaclets see10:19
gnomefreakasac: they are all gone for day arnt they?10:19
asachjmf: cool10:19
=== hjmf is unable to interpret the firefox debug build session output
asachjmf: have you been able to extract a testcase?10:19
hjmfthe reporter send it yesterday10:20
hjmfit is 100% reproducible in the debug build10:20
hjmfand almost the same in our build10:20
hjmfthough not always crashes10:20
asaccool10:21
asacupstream bug?10:21
hjmfsure10:21
=== gnomefreak goes for smoke than back to trying to figure this POS out
asachjmf: does it happen on trunk as well?10:21
hjmfdunno I have 1.8 branch10:21
hjmfdon't have the trunk yet10:21
hjmfCSS stuff10:22
asachjmf: maybe try if it crashes paradiso10:22
asac(though its not debug build)10:22
hjmfah cool will try :)10:22
asacif it does i will try on debug build to get a trunk log10:23
asacas upstream is more likely to look into this quick if its trunk :)10:23
asacmost developers hate branches ... there hard beats for the trunk :)10:24
hjmfasac: it crashed with granparadiso too10:25
hjmfthough it doesn't have generated a crash report10:25
asachjmf: THATS good10:26
hjmfasac: I will download trunk tomorrow so I'll be able to test there too :)10:26
asacNSPR_LOG_MODULES=all:510:26
asactry to set that10:26
asacin environment10:26
hjmfk10:26
asacand see if you get more output10:26
asac(though i guess debug build already spits out most)10:27
asacyou can set NSPR_LOG_FILE=/tmp/log.txt10:27
asacto put output to file10:27
hjmf... I'm downloading it know and let it build tonight10:27
hjmfasac: k10:27
asachjmf: use CVS if you want to build trunk10:27
asac(e.g. don't download tarballs :))10:27
gnomefreakok myabe libpng12-dev has limited support10:27
asaclike in wiki10:27
hjmfI'll follow your instructions in wiki10:28
asacgnomefreak: back to you now10:28
asacwhat is the problem?10:28
hjmfyeah10:28
gnomefreakchecking for png_get_valid in -lpng... yes10:28
gnomefreakchecking for png_get_acTL in -lpng... no10:28
asacdoes it fail to build?10:28
gnomefreakyes10:28
asaconly on feisty?10:28
gnomefreakfails to configure10:28
gnomefreakdont know didnt try gutsy10:28
asacgnomefreak: did you enable system-png10:29
asacor is that what i am doing?10:29
gnomefreakit was already enabled10:29
asachmmm ... then why would it fail10:29
asaci mean it always built10:29
asacor did it just pop up recently?10:29
asace.g. 5 days ago it built ... but now it fails?10:29
gnomefreakthi sis first build it failed on png10:29
gnomefreakasac: right10:29
asacwhen was last trunk update you successfully pushed?10:30
gnomefreakbuilt fine on 22nd10:30
asace.g. date (so i can get a regreseion window)10:30
gnomefreak^^^10:30
asacso last week10:30
gnomefreakyes10:30
asachttp://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsquery.cgi?treeid=default&module=all&branch=HEAD&branchtype=match&dir=&file=&filetype=match&who=&whotype=match&sortby=Date&hours=2&date=week&mindate=&maxdate=&cvsroot=%2Fcvsroot10:31
asacthose are checkins on trunk for last week10:31
asacconfigure.in has been touched three times10:31
asacbut i don't see from comments that they changed anything10:31
asac--- in regards to apng10:32
gnomefreakthey dont like to comment often i see10:34
asacactually they have pretty good checkin comments10:34
asacalmost all checkins have a bug for instance10:34
asace.g. almost all checkins have been approved and were developed as patches10:35
gnomefreakoh im looking at all the white space just relized all those are in one comment10:36
gnomefreakfound it10:40
gnomefreakBug 375921, configure should throw error when APNG not found, Patch by Andrew Smith, r=dbaron, r=benjamin10:41
asacgnomefreak: oh10:41
gnomefreakmozilla bug 37592110:42
ubotuMozilla bug 375921 in Build Config "configure should throw error when APNG not found" [Normal,Resolved: fixed]  http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37592110:42
asaci don't see it gnomefreak10:42
asacin the checkin list10:42
asacmust have happened before last week10:42
gnomefreakhttp://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvslog.cgi?file=mozilla/configure.in&root=/cvsroot10:42
asacor do you see it in the checkins i gave you?10:42
gnomefreakoh damn10:42
gnomefreakit was 18th :(10:42
asacah10:42
asacoh interesting10:43
gnomefreakno its not10:43
gnomefreakwtf is this10:44
asacapparently we always build with embeeded png10:44
asacbecause:10:44
asacA check was added to configure.in so that if the system libpng doesn't have10:44
asacAPNG support, the embedded library is used.10:44
gnomefreakit was done on the 25th10:44
asacIt would be nice to have configure through an error rather than silently ignore10:44
asacthe --with-system-png option10:44
asacso good to see this now10:44
asacgnomefreak: for now drop system-png flag10:44
gnomefreakok10:44
asacand bug me weekly to figure out what we can do10:44
asace.g. either patch libpng10:44
asacor provide libapng :)10:44
gnomefreakanother package :(10:45
asacyeah i don't like it either10:45
asacwhich is why i want to figure out if we can prepatch libpng10:45
gnomefreakyour gonna run into this on granparadiso unless it gets fixed by next tarball10:45
asac(assuming that libpng upstream willa ccept the apng patch developed by mozilla at some point)10:45
asacit won't get fixed10:45
asacits better to get an error instead of silently fallback to embedded png10:46
asacin this way we get at least reminded10:46
hjmfnight ;)10:48
asacsunbird 0.5 is out10:50
asac:)10:50
asaci was reminded by a flood of mails asking for a package10:51
gnomefreaklol10:51
asacmaybe i should really package one11:02
asacanyone volunteers ?11:02
asac:)11:02
asacshould be really simple with the new package layout of firefox11:02
asachave we retrieved any useful crash report since apport is on?11:04
asacor is it completely broken?11:05
gnomefreakpackage what?11:05
asacsunbird11:07
asac:)11:07
asacand lightning while we are at it :)11:07
asacthose two should be the last mozilla apps we are adding11:07
gnomefreakthe hard part isnt done for me ;)11:07
asacat least I don't know of more11:07
gnomefreakrules file is the hardest part that im not sure of11:07
asacactually sunbird shouldn't be hard11:07
asacjust start with firefox11:08
asacchange configure11:08
asacthen you are almost done :)11:08
gnomefreakremind me and ill look at it in morning11:09
asacyeah11:09
asacwe can go through it11:09
gnomefreakwould be nice if i can pull whole debian file from ffox :)11:12
asacgnomefreak: you start by branching firefox bzr like:11:12
asacbzr branch ..../ubuntu.2.0.0.x sunbird.ubuntu.0.511:12
asacthe you just modify all debian/ content as necessary11:13
asacso yes you can pull whole debian file from ffox11:13
asacthats the idea11:13
gnomefreakah cool11:13
asacif you have bzr branch on local disk11:13
asacyou can just branch from that one11:13
asac(so you don't need to download all)11:13
gnomefreakok ill branch it locally (might even still have it) and we can start there in morning. im grabbing source tarball atm11:14
asacgnomefreak: yeah thats good11:14
asacjust build a proper orig.tar.gz from it11:14
asacso you can bzr bd11:14
asac:)11:14
asacgnomefreak: if you want i can build orig as well11:15
asacso we can use same11:15
asac(i think its more faster for you to wait till i uploaded11:15
asacthan me till you uploaded :)11:15
gnomefreakasac: ok11:16
gnomefreaklooks like source tarballs are same for lighting and sunbird so couldnt we add in control lightning?11:16
asacgnomefreak: yeah ... we probably can11:17
gnomefreakgood :)11:17
asacbut not in first step11:17
gnomefreakno we have alot of other work to do first11:17
asacactually archive admins are pretty much pissed for every new mozilla tarball arriving11:18
asacits always 90% the same11:18
asacso in a perfect world we could strip everything out and build against system xulrunner or something11:18
asacbut well11:18
asaci tried it trice11:18
gnomefreakyeah i know they are11:19
asacit works pretty well11:19
asachowever it fails in the final bits11:19
asacbut lets see ... maybe i can come up with some wizardry11:19
gnomefreakflash fails?11:20
asacwhy?11:20
asacno it is just manually blocked11:20
gnomefreakyou siad it fails in final bits11:20
gnomefreaksaid*11:20
asacno sunbird11:20
asacgnomefreak: remember the current topic :)11:21
gnomefreakyou already started on that11:21
gnomefreaklol11:21
bluekujagoodnight guys11:21
bluekuja:)11:21
bluekujacu tomorrow11:21
gnomefreakbluekuja: night11:21
asacbluekuja: night ... did i forget something?11:21
bluekujaasac: like?11:21
asacbluekuja: i have the feeling you asked something and i didn't answer11:21
bluekujammm11:21
asacbecause i ate or did laundry or something11:21
asacand then forgot11:21
=== gnomefreak goes for a shower be back in a few
asacif you don't know11:21
asacthen probably not11:21
bluekujajust mail one11:21
asacbluekuja: yeah11:22
bluekujaand you answered11:22
asacok11:22
bluekuja:(11:22
bluekuja*:)11:22
bluekujadamn keyboard11:22
asacbluekuja: night!11:22
bluekuja^^11:22
bluekujanight ;)11:22
asac:)11:22
gnomefreakfuck trunk11:22
asacgnomefreak: just remove --use-system-ong11:23
asacpng11:23
asacfrom rules11:23
asacthen go11:23
gnomefreakconfigure: error: system-png=/usr: invalid package name11:23
gnomefreaki used --without11:23
gnomefreakshould i have removed it instead?11:23
gnomefreakguess from that error i have ot11:23
gnomefreakto11:23
asacdoesn't matter i gues11:26
asacdefault is to not use system png11:26
asacif you drop it it won't be used11:26
asacif you negate ... same result11:26
asacgnomefreak: just drop it11:27
gnomefreakwell it failed using --without11:27
gnomefreakso i dropped it now11:27
asacwhat was it before?11:27
gnomefreakand we will see.11:27
asacgnomefreak: if you say --without-system-png11:27
asacit makes no sense to say11:27
asac--without-system-png=/usr11:27
asacyou see?11:27
gnomefreak=/usr was there11:27
asacyeah11:27
gnomefreakit was all one line i just changes --with to --without11:28
asacit only makes sense with enabling options ... e.g. tell compilere wher eit its11:28
asacyes11:28
asacbut you would have to drop =/usr as well11:28
asacas it makes no sense11:28
asacfor withou11:28
asactz11:28
asacgnomefreak: but just drop that whole line for now11:28
gnomefreaki just did11:28
asack11:28
=== gnomefreak off to shower ill bbiab
asacsunbird pushing11:29
asac 75%   29MB  82.8KB/s   01:57 ETA11:29
asacaccording to my calendar alpha6 is ment to be released tomorrow11:31
asachttp://people.ubuntu.com/~asac/tarballs/lightning-sunbird_0.5.orig.tar.gz11:32
asacthere it is11:32
=== asac has to go ahead with laundry
=== gnomefreak might have an idea
gnomefreakgrrrrrr11:47
gnomefreakasac: im adding random things to the files in debian dir for trunk ;)11:51
=== gnomefreak can only hope this works :)
asacwhy?11:53
gnomefreakasac: for granparadiso you are gonna need libcurl3-dev as a build-dep11:53
asacthat doesn't sound promissing11:53
asacoh ... yes might be11:53
gnomefreakmozilla crash reporter11:54
gnomefreakairbag :)11:54
asaci read something about curl in checkins11:54
asacso configure still fails?11:54
gnomefreakits testing and they want feedback i figure lets enable it11:54
asacw/o libcurl3-dev?=11:54
gnomefreakasac: it did because of airbag but fixed that11:54
asachmmm11:54
asacok when you are done let me look at your changes ... or push to mt branch or something11:55
gnomefreakeither add libcurl3-dev or --disable-airbag11:55
asacwhat is airbag?11:55
gnomefreakthe crash reporter11:55
gnomefreakmozillas11:55
Admiral_Chicagobreakpad?11:55
asacah ... hmmm ... lets think about it ... but i think we should disable11:55
asacwe have apport for that11:55
gnomefreakconfigure: error: Couldn't find libcurl, which is required for the crash reporter.  Use --disable-airbag to disable the crash reporter.11:55
gnomefreakfeistys apport doesnt cover our preview archive11:56
gnomefreakatleast not new packages11:56
asacah right.11:56
gnomefreakyou can use --disable in gutsy11:56
asacTBH, i am unsure if they are really happy if we enable it11:57
asacbecause then they will receive crash reports from a build that might be different from theirs11:57
gnomefreakhmmmmm11:57
asacanyway ... enable it for now if you want11:57
asaci will figure out11:57
asacand contact upstream ... e.g. what do they wnat11:57
gnomefreakif it failed ill change it but if it passes im not stopping it11:57
gnomefreakif they want it disabled its easy enough11:58
asacgnomefreak: maybe test what happens if you crash it :)11:58
asac... we have a testcase now again :)11:58
gnomefreakofcourse :)11:58
asacAdmiral_Chicago: do you know of the breakpad state?11:58
=== gnomefreak almost suggested we use debians debian dir for sunbird and hack at that
gnomefreakbut they are a bit on the lower version end11:59
gnomefreakasac: use the ubuntu2.0.0.x branch for sunbird?12:02
gnomefreakasuming its better than trunk12:02
asacyes12:03
asacshould be better12:03
asacthough it shouldn't matter much12:03
asacgnomefreak: TBH, i don't know how far those have diverged12:03
asaciirc it should just be different configure options12:04
asacand of course control, et al12:04
gnomefreakthats what we find out tomorrow?12:04
asacgnomefreak: do we have a -dom-inspector package for paradiso/trunk as well?12:04
gnomefreaki think trunk does12:04
asacok then there is no difference i guess12:04
asacjust take whatever you have on your disk12:04
gnomefreakk12:04
asacoh12:05
asacbetter use 2.0.0.x12:05
asacas the patches will most likely apply12:05
gnomefreakhopfully12:05
asacand might be beneficial for sunbird12:05
asac(though lots might be wipable)=12:05
gnomefreakthe smaller the better ;)12:05
gnomefreakafter we get sunbird to build ill make a MT branch of it12:08
asacright12:09
asacmozilla bug 37778212:11
ubotuMozilla bug 377782 in File Handling "Simplify content-handling UI" [Normal,New]  http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37778212:11
asacmozilla bug 34880812:13
ubotuMozilla bug 348808 in File Handling "use application selector instead of file selector dialog when picking helper apps" [Normal,New]  http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34880812:14

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!