[12:32] k ill start reading a little later :) [12:32] yeah [12:32] the first is a pretty good read [12:32] i already learned some things :) [12:32] ok cool :) [12:48] ok night [12:49] night === cjwatson_ [n=cjwatson@82-69-40-219.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [02:42] @schedule new_york [02:42] Schedule for America/New_York: 28 Jun 11:00: Ubuntu Development Team | 29 Jun 07:00: MOTU Team | 03 Jul 15:00: Technical Board | 04 Jul 16:00: Edubuntu | 05 Jul 16:00: Ubuntu Development Team | 10 Jul 11:00: Kernel Team === asac_ [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === asac_ [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [04:20] anyone have an idea about what to do about bug 88573 [04:20] Launchpad bug 88573 in firefox "[feisty] Firefox Crashed x86_64" [High,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/88573 [04:44] also bug 110802 [04:44] Launchpad bug 110802 in firefox "[feisty] Firefox Crashed x86_64" [High,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/110802 [04:44] i think that could be rejected === asac_ [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === shirish [n=shirish@59.95.37.101] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [05:40] guys anybody up? [05:43] asac: you up m8? === ubotu [n=ubotu@ubuntu/bot/ubotu] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === red_herring [n=rj@unaffiliated/redherring/x-220354] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === shirish [n=shirish@59.95.37.101] has left #ubuntu-mozillateam [] [07:11] gp/minefield is in universe right? [07:11] in gutsy I mean === poningru assumes so [07:12] please correct in GutsyGibbon/Testing/Tribe2 if not [07:17] poningru: it is [07:17] awesome thanks === gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === AlexLatchford [n=alex@82-44-193-109.cable.ubr07.haye.blueyonder.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === gnomefreak needs to find some easy fix bugs today [09:04] if anyone runs across bugs like wrong depends or something fairly easy please let me know [09:07] i'll keep an eye out [09:08] Admiral_Chicago: ty [09:08] updating java in the preview archive after a few requests [09:08] all frigging night ive beem at it === Admiral_Chicago [n=Freddy@adsl-68-72-103-252.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === Admiral_Chicago [n=FreddyM@adsl-68-72-103-252.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [10:43] asac: firefox-granparadiso-bin: /build/buildd/libcairo-1.4.8/src/cairo-hash.c:196: _cairo_hash_table_destroy: Assertion `hash_table->live_entries == 0' failed. that cant be good [10:44] Admiral_Chicago: bug 122737 im fairly sure that is the way it ships this early in devel. [10:44] Launchpad bug 122737 in firefox-granparadiso "No default search engines" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/122737 [11:03] gnomefreak: can you upgrade using feisty preview archive? [11:03] for me it removes almost everything [11:04] e.g. feisty archive is broken for amd64 [11:04] i cannot use dist-upgrade [11:21] gnomefreak: i think i really need a list of what is not in amd64 archive [11:21] and build that [11:21] at least there is no firefox in there? [11:26] is it because of nss and nspr -dev packages? [11:26] yeah because of nss [11:27] and we cannot really provide firefox then [11:27] without respinning lots of things in the archive [11:27] nevermind [11:28] i think we have to accept that [11:28] asac: gutsys ff should have stopped that no? [11:28] no ... firefox still conflicts libnss3 [11:29] and there is no real way out of this [11:29] asac: what did we do for gutsy? [11:29] nothing ... everything is respun against libnss3-0d [11:29] cant i do that for preview as well or is it way too much [11:29] so we don't have a problem [11:30] but i don't its feasible to do that for feisty archive [11:31] :( i hate it that its like that but as you said when we first saw it that it will only affect building it so we left it that way [11:31] is tribe-2 out? [11:31] almost [11:31] out-of-freeze? [11:32] last i heard they were still testing maybe ~6 hours ago [11:32] asac: no i think we are still frozen [11:32] edubuntu-server needed testing last i heard [11:32] hmm === gnomefreak hasnt slept yet so ive seen alot [11:32] ok [11:33] topic in -devel says we are still frozen [11:33] http://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox:2.0.0.5 [11:33] holy shit [11:33] already [11:33] hopefully we manage to backport it in time [11:34] not yet [11:34] its just the schedule :) [11:35] i would like to get that in preview as soon as we can (screw everyone else i want it) ;) === gnomefreak thinks i can handle that though as long as i can use same rules file and stuff from .0.4 [11:36] there should be not much problems upgrading from .4 to .5 [11:36] but we need 1.5.0.x [11:36] for dapper [11:36] btw if i can get back onto a real sleep schedule i will start reading the merging pages again at 2am they made very little sense [11:36] at least for this release [11:36] oh [11:37] ok ... take your time [11:37] get some rest [11:38] asac: im gonna go through and see if i cant get some little fixes in (wroing depends or adding a patch or 3) but that is just so i can say i did something today and helpful for me to working with patches === gnomefreak can use the practice with patches [11:39] ;) [11:40] but finding them is hard there are alot of bugs out there ;) and naming patches is a bit well unknown to me atm so it will help me get the understanding on naming them, since i cant name the diff-config.dpatch [11:43] yeah [11:43] bug 81858 [11:43] Launchpad bug 81858 in firefox "Digg.com slows down the browser" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/81858 [11:43] claims that http://windyroad.org/software/wordpress/vistered-little-theme/ [11:43] scrolls smoothly on win [11:44] looking [11:44] not real smooth here [11:45] kind of laggy/jerky [11:46] what i mean by that is it moves a little stops than moves a little stops ...... [11:47] yes [11:47] now what i would like to know is how are they scrolling [11:47] he claims that its smooth on winxp === gnomefreak doesnt have xp handy [11:47] me neither [11:51] im not real conviced its 3D causing this, im more on the lines of X not the acctual drivers for cards (i bet you change it to vesa it does it as well [11:51] digg works fine for me [11:52] ok they must be using the arrows to scroll page [11:53] hmm [11:53] its a bit choppy and slow using the slider arrows but wouse wheel and grabbing the slider and moving it work fine [11:56] what does the scroll bar use? (not sure if you are gonna know what i mean but thinking isnt really great atm. i guess like is there a wrapper for opengl that would cause that or is the scrollbar a plugin built into package [11:57] i guess what i mean is what is behind the way the arrows work on the scoll bar [11:58] as for the first complaint i can not reproduce but there seems to be several complaints on this bug [11:59] and at that time edgy/dapper we used pango as default and disabling it made pages load faster and not freeze as often so if that is still complaint try that [12:06] imo that site is just shitty [12:10] that was my next guess is that content on site since it doesnt do it on all sites [12:40] heya guys [12:40] :) [12:40] asac: all of my packages are now in testing [12:40] hi [12:40] heya gnomefreak [12:40] :) [12:40] gnomefreak, how are you? [12:41] bluekuja: tired and yourself? [12:41] gnomefreak, really tired man, just finished working [12:41] and gonna leave again in 15 mins [12:41] :/ [12:41] i know the feeling :( [12:41] :) [12:42] bluekuja: all? even those that are stilil in NEW? [12:42] asac: except the ones in NEW [12:42] that are still there [12:42] :/ [12:42] the ftp-master that follows NEW is on holiday [12:42] :( [12:43] and gtorrent gonna move to testing too soon [12:45] who is the ftp-master that follows new? [12:45] i thought there were at least a few [12:45] ganneff [12:46] ganneff ... hmmm jeroen [12:46] should do it as well [12:46] yeah [12:46] but it doesnt [12:46] ^^ [12:46] is he gone as well? [12:46] dont know [12:46] they said me [12:46] ganneff is the only one [12:46] that follows NEW [12:50] I'm leaving again [12:50] asac: see you later [12:50] :) [12:52] bug 115687 [12:52] Launchpad bug 115687 in sun-java6 "java6 update1 is released, please update" [Low,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/115687 [12:52] damn [01:02] asac: what do you want to do with bug 119657 [01:02] Launchpad bug 119657 in firefox "There is no flash support in Firefox. (PowerPC)" [Wishlist,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/119657 [01:03] im not real confident that adobe is willing to port it for ppc as they have never done in past and there hasnt been a response on it in a while, do we have contacts at adobe bychance? [01:03] gnomefreak: closed [01:03] no we don't have contacts with adobe [01:04] they just don't care ... and honestly i don't care much as well [01:04] free-software will win in the end anyway ... so ... [01:04] and has nspluginwrapper hit repos in gutsy? any plans to backport for feisty? [01:05] not now [01:05] in gutsy it is ... yes [01:06] close bug 99352 or mark it as wishlist and see if we cant get it backported? [01:06] Launchpad bug 99352 in firefox "feisty+firefox+amd64+java=segfault" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/99352 [01:07] bug 108733 [01:07] Launchpad bug 108733 in nspluginwrapper "flash losing clicks with desktop effects enabled" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/108733 [01:07] hmmmmmm [01:07] yeah ... its definitly desktop effects then [01:09] 108733 say it happens outside of d-e [01:10] i just subscribed us to nspluginwrapper since its your project [01:10] yeah sometimes flash doesn't get events [01:10] but thats no news [01:10] i think that bug should be assigned to compiz [01:11] i will add the target [01:11] ty [01:12] done [01:12] ...gone [01:12] :) [01:12] # - Check acroread5, something is missing while loading a PDF is bad in nspluginwrapper [01:12] we dropped acroread afaik [01:12] !info acroread feisty [01:12] Package acroread does not exist in feisty [01:12] acroread5 is 10 years old afaik [01:13] we can't support that [01:13] asac: we dropped it due to upstream no support [01:13] i would think it can be dropped from mkruntime.sh [01:14] bug 121066 is what im looking at about that === gnomefreak trying to clean up bugs that are on my list [01:14] Launchpad bug 121066 in nspluginwrapper "mkruntime.sh script is invalid sh" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/121066 [01:15] there is a crap load of them === DarkMageZ [n=richard@238.101.233.220.exetel.com.au] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [01:18] mozilla is making me sick caring more about windows bugs than ours === gnomefreak thought we fixed this, maybe ill test later [01:25] ill brb im gonna test this bug as i thought it was fixed. [01:31] bluekuja: wanna provide a debdiff for bug 121066 [01:31] Launchpad bug 121066 in nspluginwrapper "mkruntime.sh script is invalid sh" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/121066 === gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [01:32] gnomefreak: maybe consider to provide a debdiff for bug 121066 [01:32] would be a good motu work :) [01:32] patch is attached ... so you need just to assemble new package version with that patch [01:33] and attach debdiff + subscribe ubuntu-universe-sponsors [01:33] k looking [01:35] asac: dont think i can [01:36] but give me a few to figure out [01:37] oh well i guess ill try to grab it from packages.ubuntu [01:48] asac: http://gnomefreak.pastebin.ca/593527 does that look sane? [01:49] thats just a diff [01:49] not a debdiff [01:49] gnomefreak: apt-get source nspluginwrapper [01:49] then make new version that has that patch [01:49] then debdiff original and new .dsc file [01:50] asac: i have the source but i cant apt-get it or build anything [01:50] then thats the problem you have to figure out [01:50] apt-get source should work [01:50] fix your sources.list [01:50] or something [01:50] asac: i dont have 64 [01:50] ah [01:50] yeah ... but apt-get source should work anyway [01:51] it doesnt [01:51] sure ... i already did [01:51] or? [01:51] hmm [01:51] leave it alone [01:51] E: Could not open file /var/lib/apt/lists/gb.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_gutsy_main_source_Sources - open (2 No such file or directory) [01:51] thats something different [01:51] your apt cache is broken [01:51] probably you have removed the deb-src line from sources.list [01:52] nope sources list is fine [01:53] deb-src http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ gutsy main restricted [01:53] oh wait let me try something [02:10] asac: wtf [02:12] universe [02:12] is missing [02:12] asac: is there a reason you have build-dep libc6-dev-i386 and not just libc6-dev [02:12] ... nspluginwrapper is still in universe [02:12] yes [02:12] on amd64 we need i386 :) [02:12] also make: dh_testdir: Command not found [02:12] make: *** [clean] Error 127 [02:12] thats the trick of nspluginwrapper [02:13] yeah thats stupid error [02:13] try to figure out [02:13] you don't have build-essential installed [02:13] i should [02:13] yep it is [02:15] dh_clean -k is there [02:17] under clean there is dh_testdir dh_testroot dh_clean rm -f build-stamp and -$(MAKE) distclean [02:17] hmmmm let me see if im missing something [02:19] hmmm suggest dh-make but cant install that [02:23] looks like chroot was missing a bunch of build-deps so after they install ill try again but there are 2 i hope i dont need to do this [02:39] asac: should i check the box on LP that says this attachment is a patch? [02:41] why? [02:41] its done and attached [02:42] it has a box for "is this a patch" [02:42] but either way its attached i followed a wiki so if its wrong blame the wiki :) === gnomefreak was missing devscripts :( [02:44] crap i thought i added removed them due to bash not dash but oh well [02:51] let me see [02:52] bug 121066 [02:52] Launchpad bug 121066 in nspluginwrapper "mkruntime.sh script is invalid sh" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/121066 [02:52] looks good ... if it applies :) [02:53] gnomefreak: do debdiffs always have this /tmp/.... in patchfile? [02:54] how did you produce it? [02:54] that was the dir i was using' [02:54] gnomefreak: no ... you should just use debdiff [02:54] (e.g. instead of diff [02:54] ) [02:54] i did [02:54] really? ... how? [02:54] you still have the command? [02:55] debdiff napluginwrapper.....ubuntu2.dsc nsplugin....ubuntu1.dsc > naplugin..debdiff [02:55] short version [02:56] ok [02:56] so without /tmp/... ? [02:56] right [02:56] you have both .dsc files in same directory? [02:56] yes [02:56] k [02:56] then its probably fine [02:57] ok subscribe ubuntu-universe-sponsors :) [02:57] @schedule berlin [02:57] Schedule for Europe/Berlin: 28 Jun 17:00: Ubuntu Development Team | 29 Jun 13:00: MOTU Team | 03 Jul 21:00: Technical Board | 04 Jul 22:00: Edubuntu | 05 Jul 22:00: Ubuntu Development Team | 10 Jul 17:00: Kernel Team [02:57] http://gnomefreak.pastebin.ca/593609 [02:58] thats it? [02:58] yes [02:58] k :) [02:58] subscribe universe-sponsors :) [02:59] that pastebin is what i had in dir [02:59] both? [02:59] he? [02:59] both what? [02:59] just universe sponsors [03:00] ubuntu-universe-sponsers or universe-sponcers [03:01] i got it === cjwatson_ [n=cjwatson@82-69-40-219.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [03:07] gnomefreak: maybe give credits to patch author in changelog as well [03:07] so re do it? [03:08] easy enough [03:08] e.g. ...: applied patch by Anders Kaseorg to fix blablabla [03:08] gnomefreak: yes please [03:08] credits are important in a community of volunteers [03:08] you got it [03:08] anders@kaseorg.com is his email [03:09] ok ty [03:13] ok all is open again [03:13] now let me think which steps to take next :/ [03:14] hjmf_: you there? [03:15] oh i appear to be still away :) [03:16] gnomefreak: let me know when new debdiff is up ... i wanna push it :) [03:16] k [03:17] asac: its up [03:17] let me know if good [03:18] @schedule new_york [03:18] Schedule for America/New_York: 28 Jun 11:00: Ubuntu Development Team | 29 Jun 07:00: MOTU Team | 03 Jul 15:00: Technical Board | 04 Jul 16:00: Edubuntu | 05 Jul 16:00: Ubuntu Development Team | 10 Jul 11:00: Kernel Team [03:20] im not real sure why /tmp/SYk0CBNi3i/nspluginwrapper is there [03:20] gnomefreak: looks good ... next time put the credits in the same line as the patch comment [03:20] oh sorry [03:20] i will tweak the comment i guess ... but will upload after eating a banana [03:20] :) [03:20] :) === gnomefreak waiting to pass out i cant believe im still up ive been up for ~29 hours === gnomefreak goes for a drink and smoke [03:24] gnomefreak: sleep [03:24] the longer you are awake the more difficult it becomes to sleep [03:27] i will i would like to get a few more things done or started than i will lay down [03:39] asac: firefox-3.0a6pre.en-US.linux-i686.tar.bz2 [03:39] is that pre alpha6 or is it 6 [03:39] alpha6 or pre? [03:39] hmm [03:39] is there an announcement on mozillazine? [03:39] i didnt get one in email [03:40] http://www.mozillazine.org/ not from the looks of it [03:42] nope not from what i see im at the list archives and its not there [03:43] gnomefreak: pushed [03:43] http://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/nspluginwrapper/ubuntu/ [03:43] pushed to bzr as well [04:12] ty [04:17] get trunk started and im going to bed ill upload tonight or late this afternoon [05:02] asac: devel meeting [05:02] yeah [05:02] i am in :) [05:02] oh ok [05:03] thanks for the reminder :) [05:03] aah now i see you wave [05:03] yw [05:03] this is how i sleep :( === jerome_ [n=jerome@gra94-2-82-66-142-60.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [05:14] if at all possible can we try to push ffox2 into this point release, they are fairly far apart maybe 6month point releases and i would rather no have to throw it in any other time than during a point release. Ill be back later and fix trunk since it FTB === hjmf [n=hjmf@81.Red-217-125-221.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [05:33] good evening [05:45] asac: would you think that bug 122726 is a dup of bug 98938 [05:45] Launchpad bug 122726 in firefox "firefox crashed [@g_type_check_instance] [@g_signal_emit_valist] [@g_signal_emit] " [High,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/122726 [05:45] Launchpad bug 98938 in firefox "MASTER Firefox Crashed [@IA__g_type_check_instance_is_a] " [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/98938 [05:46] the pattern of the stacktrace is very symilar though the function names of the stacks aren't the same [05:46] e.g [05:46] g_type_check_instance, g_signal_emit_valist, g_signal_emit, gtk_widget_event_internal [05:46] vs [05:47] hmm [05:47] IA__g_type_check_instance, IA__g_signal_emit_valist, IA__g_signal_emit, gtk_widget_event_internal [05:48] also we have bug 93841 [05:48] Launchpad bug 93841 in firefox "MASTER Firefox Crashed [@IA__g_type_check_instance] [@ IA__g_signal_emit_valist] " [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/93841 [05:48] Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?) [05:48] but in ^^ the stacktrace is a bit different [05:48] yes, those ones show that error [05:48] i don't think we should take any retrace that has that message seriously [05:49] hmm, corrupt stack then [05:49] yes [05:49] can be anything [05:49] we should throw them away then [05:49] either its really corrupt stack [05:49] only 3 dups though [05:49] or retrace / coredump problem [05:50] k, will tag as invalid that master [05:50] i think thats the right decision [05:50] hjmf: one might check if the line numbers make sense [05:50] e.g. does gobject.c:1737 [05:51] really invoke [05:51] gtype.c:3115 [05:51] aeh ... really invoke IA__g_type_check_instance_is_a [05:52] i would say we should close it [05:52] both masters [05:52] we have enough crashes anyway [05:52] both masters? [05:52] i only see one [05:52] oh right [05:52] but bug 93841 doesn't have a dupe [05:52] ubotu: hello? [05:52] looking I thought it had 3 [05:53] yep one has 3 dups and the other 4 [05:53] right i confused ... bug 122726 [05:54] doesn't have a dupe [05:54] maybe we merge both in one to catch duplicates [05:54] or doesn't make sense at all [05:54] ah there were 3 bugs involved :) [05:54] since corrupt stack [05:54] yes [05:54] 3 bugs ;) [05:54] one new and both masters [05:54] if they don't have similar use cases in summary (e.g. most use mplayer) [05:54] then we can close them [05:54] looking [05:55] we will catch dupes too [05:55] so if it really grows we can revive it at anypoint [05:56] ok [05:56] looking at the summaries there is no relation between them [05:57] each one seems to happened w/o relation with each other [05:57] back [05:57] heya :) [05:57] so..... closing them muahahahahaha! :) === cjwatson [n=cjwatson@82-69-40-219.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === ubotu [n=ubotu@ubuntu/bot/ubotu] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === red_herring [n=rj@unaffiliated/redherring/x-220354] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [06:04] asac: :) news? === hjmf 's off to take some rest [07:19] asac: leaving again, tell me when you gonna send the mail, cya later [07:19] :) === JenFraggle [n=jen@host217-43-183-130.range217-43.btcentralplus.com] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === AlexLatchford [n=alex@82-44-193-109.cable.ubr07.haye.blueyonder.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [09:01] its AlexLatchford... [09:01] hey there JenFraggle [09:03] hi [09:03] how is it going? [09:03] also, what are you currently working on? === dotpavan [n=pavan@d00-129-24-143-178.dhcp.unm.edu] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [09:06] things are going well. currently working on wiki [09:06] which one? [09:07] beginner page [09:07] got a link? [09:07] haven't posted it yet, working on it locally first [09:09] awesome [09:09] how are things with you? [09:17] i was busy with xubuntu release notes [09:18] asac: is it just me or doesnt libpng suppport APNG? === jerome_ [n=jerome@gra94-2-82-66-142-60.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [09:35] gnomefreak: you are right [09:35] asac: i wish i was [09:36] configure: error: --with-system-png won't work because the system's libpng doesn't have APNG support [09:37] so either feistys libpng12-dev doesnt provide support for it or -trunk is really mucked up somewhere [09:39] hmm [09:39] let me eat first [09:39] take you rtime [09:48] k ten minutes ... have start laundry :( [09:48] k [09:53] k [09:53] somehow available [09:53] is new flash already in? [09:54] 9.0.31.0.4ubuntu2 [09:54] oh crap, I can test the new gnash... [09:54] is that the new one [09:54] Admiral_Chicago: its the best release of gnash so far :) [09:55] asac: back [09:55] :) [09:56] where is the amd64 build? [09:56] bluekuja: hey [09:56] i am also more or less back :) [09:56] :) [09:56] i'm looking forward to free flash [09:56] dont know i cant see tham afaik [09:57] asac; my post is going great! only you and laserjock need to post and MC can start [09:57] Admiral_Chicago: me too [09:57] bluekuja: how do you know? [09:57] lots of gstreamer deps... [09:57] grr. [09:57] what is bad about gstreamer? [09:58] asac: usually two days to wait sponsors [09:58] Admiral_Chicago: you want sound? [09:58] and then they start [09:58] no, i don't need that :) [09:58] we decided to use it because its not crap like ffmpeg :) [09:58] asac: *usually* [09:58] :) [09:58] bluekuja: i already chattet with dholbach [09:58] asac: oh great! [09:58] :) [09:59] it's ok then [09:59] :) [09:59] good ... i will ask him tomorrow morning if i should send mail as well [09:59] ok, you rock alex! [09:59] gonna offer you some beers [09:59] its so damn busted [09:59] when I come there [09:59] i uploaded the flashplugin nonfree package to get an amd64 build [10:00] and now ... nothing [10:00] not tried [10:00] not in queue [10:00] where is it? [10:00] did they know to have it built on 64? [10:01] although it goes to new beofre it goes to build farm [10:01] he? [10:01] i set Architecture: i386 amd64 in control [10:01] gnomefreak: do i need to set this up manually? [10:02] shoudlnt [10:04] hmmm wonder why :( [10:04] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+queue?queue_state=3&queue_text=flashplugin-nonfree [10:05] Files: 4397d30dfe6380273100a8d540b48819 16772 contrib/web optional flashplugin-nonfree_9.0.31.0.4ubuntu2_i386.deb d00d7f9923525c4808836de0813493ca 9365 raw-translations - flashplugin-nonfree_9.0.31.0.4ubuntu2_i386_translations.tar.gz [10:06] asac: only shows 386 === gnomefreak gonna assume that is why only 386 build. [10:10] hmm asac you didnt set it to 64 [10:11] atleast not from what im seeing [10:11] asac: Architecture: i386_translations i386 (shouldnt 64 be in that line === gnomefreak could be wrong but the 2 that are listed there built [10:14] gnomefreak: look at .dsc [10:15] cant from here :( have to look for it [10:17] I've been able to reproduce bug 110212 [10:17] Launchpad bug 110212 in firefox "[FEISTY] firefox crashed [@nsHTMLContainerFrame::CreateViewForFrame] [@nsCSSFrameConstructor::BeginBuildingScrollFrame] " [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/110212 [10:17] asac: yeah you did but why didnt it show as you did on query [10:18] no idea :9 [10:18] i am trying to figure out [10:18] maybe it is soyez issue :( [10:18] soyuz [10:18] yes [10:18] that too [10:18] luckily soyuz main developer was my roommate in seville :) [10:18] so when i get him i will figure out :) [10:19] :) [10:19] ... probably that crash happens only in the site reported in the test case [10:19] but first i pinged "normal archive admin" [10:19] lets see [10:19] asac: they are all gone for day arnt they? [10:19] hjmf: cool === hjmf is unable to interpret the firefox debug build session output [10:19] hjmf: have you been able to extract a testcase? [10:20] the reporter send it yesterday [10:20] it is 100% reproducible in the debug build [10:20] and almost the same in our build [10:20] though not always crashes [10:21] cool [10:21] upstream bug? [10:21] sure === gnomefreak goes for smoke than back to trying to figure this POS out [10:21] hjmf: does it happen on trunk as well? [10:21] dunno I have 1.8 branch [10:21] don't have the trunk yet [10:22] CSS stuff [10:22] hjmf: maybe try if it crashes paradiso [10:22] (though its not debug build) [10:22] ah cool will try :) [10:23] if it does i will try on debug build to get a trunk log [10:23] as upstream is more likely to look into this quick if its trunk :) [10:24] most developers hate branches ... there hard beats for the trunk :) [10:25] asac: it crashed with granparadiso too [10:25] though it doesn't have generated a crash report [10:26] hjmf: THATS good [10:26] asac: I will download trunk tomorrow so I'll be able to test there too :) [10:26] NSPR_LOG_MODULES=all:5 [10:26] try to set that [10:26] in environment [10:26] k [10:26] and see if you get more output [10:27] (though i guess debug build already spits out most) [10:27] you can set NSPR_LOG_FILE=/tmp/log.txt [10:27] to put output to file [10:27] ... I'm downloading it know and let it build tonight [10:27] asac: k [10:27] hjmf: use CVS if you want to build trunk [10:27] (e.g. don't download tarballs :)) [10:27] ok myabe libpng12-dev has limited support [10:27] like in wiki [10:28] I'll follow your instructions in wiki [10:28] gnomefreak: back to you now [10:28] what is the problem? [10:28] yeah [10:28] checking for png_get_valid in -lpng... yes [10:28] checking for png_get_acTL in -lpng... no [10:28] does it fail to build? [10:28] yes [10:28] only on feisty? [10:28] fails to configure [10:28] dont know didnt try gutsy [10:29] gnomefreak: did you enable system-png [10:29] or is that what i am doing? [10:29] it was already enabled [10:29] hmmm ... then why would it fail [10:29] i mean it always built [10:29] or did it just pop up recently? [10:29] e.g. 5 days ago it built ... but now it fails? [10:29] thi sis first build it failed on png [10:29] asac: right [10:30] when was last trunk update you successfully pushed? [10:30] built fine on 22nd [10:30] e.g. date (so i can get a regreseion window) [10:30] ^^^ [10:30] so last week [10:30] yes [10:31] http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsquery.cgi?treeid=default&module=all&branch=HEAD&branchtype=match&dir=&file=&filetype=match&who=&whotype=match&sortby=Date&hours=2&date=week&mindate=&maxdate=&cvsroot=%2Fcvsroot [10:31] those are checkins on trunk for last week [10:31] configure.in has been touched three times [10:31] but i don't see from comments that they changed anything [10:32] --- in regards to apng [10:34] they dont like to comment often i see [10:34] actually they have pretty good checkin comments [10:34] almost all checkins have a bug for instance [10:35] e.g. almost all checkins have been approved and were developed as patches [10:36] oh im looking at all the white space just relized all those are in one comment [10:40] found it [10:41] Bug 375921, configure should throw error when APNG not found, Patch by Andrew Smith, r=dbaron, r=benjamin [10:41] gnomefreak: oh [10:42] mozilla bug 375921 [10:42] Mozilla bug 375921 in Build Config "configure should throw error when APNG not found" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375921 [10:42] i don't see it gnomefreak [10:42] in the checkin list [10:42] must have happened before last week [10:42] http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvslog.cgi?file=mozilla/configure.in&root=/cvsroot [10:42] or do you see it in the checkins i gave you? [10:42] oh damn [10:42] it was 18th :( [10:42] ah [10:43] oh interesting [10:43] no its not [10:44] wtf is this [10:44] apparently we always build with embeeded png [10:44] because: [10:44] A check was added to configure.in so that if the system libpng doesn't have [10:44] APNG support, the embedded library is used. [10:44] it was done on the 25th [10:44] It would be nice to have configure through an error rather than silently ignore [10:44] the --with-system-png option [10:44] so good to see this now [10:44] gnomefreak: for now drop system-png flag [10:44] ok [10:44] and bug me weekly to figure out what we can do [10:44] e.g. either patch libpng [10:44] or provide libapng :) [10:45] another package :( [10:45] yeah i don't like it either [10:45] which is why i want to figure out if we can prepatch libpng [10:45] your gonna run into this on granparadiso unless it gets fixed by next tarball [10:45] (assuming that libpng upstream willa ccept the apng patch developed by mozilla at some point) [10:45] it won't get fixed [10:46] its better to get an error instead of silently fallback to embedded png [10:46] in this way we get at least reminded [10:48] night ;) [10:50] sunbird 0.5 is out [10:50] :) [10:51] i was reminded by a flood of mails asking for a package [10:51] lol [11:02] maybe i should really package one [11:02] anyone volunteers ? [11:02] :) [11:02] should be really simple with the new package layout of firefox [11:04] have we retrieved any useful crash report since apport is on? [11:05] or is it completely broken? [11:05] package what? [11:07] sunbird [11:07] :) [11:07] and lightning while we are at it :) [11:07] those two should be the last mozilla apps we are adding [11:07] the hard part isnt done for me ;) [11:07] at least I don't know of more [11:07] rules file is the hardest part that im not sure of [11:07] actually sunbird shouldn't be hard [11:08] just start with firefox [11:08] change configure [11:08] then you are almost done :) [11:09] remind me and ill look at it in morning [11:09] yeah [11:09] we can go through it [11:12] would be nice if i can pull whole debian file from ffox :) [11:12] gnomefreak: you start by branching firefox bzr like: [11:12] bzr branch ..../ubuntu.2.0.0.x sunbird.ubuntu.0.5 [11:13] the you just modify all debian/ content as necessary [11:13] so yes you can pull whole debian file from ffox [11:13] thats the idea [11:13] ah cool [11:13] if you have bzr branch on local disk [11:13] you can just branch from that one [11:13] (so you don't need to download all) [11:14] ok ill branch it locally (might even still have it) and we can start there in morning. im grabbing source tarball atm [11:14] gnomefreak: yeah thats good [11:14] just build a proper orig.tar.gz from it [11:14] so you can bzr bd [11:14] :) [11:15] gnomefreak: if you want i can build orig as well [11:15] so we can use same [11:15] (i think its more faster for you to wait till i uploaded [11:15] than me till you uploaded :) [11:16] asac: ok [11:16] looks like source tarballs are same for lighting and sunbird so couldnt we add in control lightning? [11:17] gnomefreak: yeah ... we probably can [11:17] good :) [11:17] but not in first step [11:17] no we have alot of other work to do first [11:18] actually archive admins are pretty much pissed for every new mozilla tarball arriving [11:18] its always 90% the same [11:18] so in a perfect world we could strip everything out and build against system xulrunner or something [11:18] but well [11:18] i tried it trice [11:19] yeah i know they are [11:19] it works pretty well [11:19] however it fails in the final bits [11:19] but lets see ... maybe i can come up with some wizardry [11:20] flash fails? [11:20] why? [11:20] no it is just manually blocked [11:20] you siad it fails in final bits [11:20] said* [11:20] no sunbird [11:21] gnomefreak: remember the current topic :) [11:21] you already started on that [11:21] lol [11:21] goodnight guys [11:21] :) [11:21] cu tomorrow [11:21] bluekuja: night [11:21] bluekuja: night ... did i forget something? [11:21] asac: like? [11:21] bluekuja: i have the feeling you asked something and i didn't answer [11:21] mmm [11:21] because i ate or did laundry or something [11:21] and then forgot === gnomefreak goes for a shower be back in a few [11:21] if you don't know [11:21] then probably not [11:21] just mail one [11:22] bluekuja: yeah [11:22] and you answered [11:22] ok [11:22] :( [11:22] *:) [11:22] damn keyboard [11:22] bluekuja: night! [11:22] ^^ [11:22] night ;) [11:22] :) [11:22] fuck trunk [11:23] gnomefreak: just remove --use-system-ong [11:23] png [11:23] from rules [11:23] then go [11:23] configure: error: system-png=/usr: invalid package name [11:23] i used --without [11:23] should i have removed it instead? [11:23] guess from that error i have ot [11:23] to [11:26] doesn't matter i gues [11:26] default is to not use system png [11:26] if you drop it it won't be used [11:26] if you negate ... same result [11:27] gnomefreak: just drop it [11:27] well it failed using --without [11:27] so i dropped it now [11:27] what was it before? [11:27] and we will see. [11:27] gnomefreak: if you say --without-system-png [11:27] it makes no sense to say [11:27] --without-system-png=/usr [11:27] you see? [11:27] =/usr was there [11:27] yeah [11:28] it was all one line i just changes --with to --without [11:28] it only makes sense with enabling options ... e.g. tell compilere wher eit its [11:28] yes [11:28] but you would have to drop =/usr as well [11:28] as it makes no sense [11:28] for withou [11:28] tz [11:28] gnomefreak: but just drop that whole line for now [11:28] i just did [11:28] k === gnomefreak off to shower ill bbiab [11:29] sunbird pushing [11:29] 75% 29MB 82.8KB/s 01:57 ETA [11:31] according to my calendar alpha6 is ment to be released tomorrow [11:32] http://people.ubuntu.com/~asac/tarballs/lightning-sunbird_0.5.orig.tar.gz [11:32] there it is === asac has to go ahead with laundry === gnomefreak might have an idea [11:47] grrrrrr [11:51] asac: im adding random things to the files in debian dir for trunk ;) === gnomefreak can only hope this works :) [11:53] why? [11:53] asac: for granparadiso you are gonna need libcurl3-dev as a build-dep [11:53] that doesn't sound promissing [11:53] oh ... yes might be [11:54] mozilla crash reporter [11:54] airbag :) [11:54] i read something about curl in checkins [11:54] so configure still fails? [11:54] its testing and they want feedback i figure lets enable it [11:54] w/o libcurl3-dev?= [11:54] asac: it did because of airbag but fixed that [11:54] hmmm [11:55] ok when you are done let me look at your changes ... or push to mt branch or something [11:55] either add libcurl3-dev or --disable-airbag [11:55] what is airbag? [11:55] the crash reporter [11:55] mozillas [11:55] breakpad? [11:55] ah ... hmmm ... lets think about it ... but i think we should disable [11:55] we have apport for that [11:55] configure: error: Couldn't find libcurl, which is required for the crash reporter. Use --disable-airbag to disable the crash reporter. [11:56] feistys apport doesnt cover our preview archive [11:56] atleast not new packages [11:56] ah right. [11:56] you can use --disable in gutsy [11:57] TBH, i am unsure if they are really happy if we enable it [11:57] because then they will receive crash reports from a build that might be different from theirs [11:57] hmmmmm [11:57] anyway ... enable it for now if you want [11:57] i will figure out [11:57] and contact upstream ... e.g. what do they wnat [11:57] if it failed ill change it but if it passes im not stopping it [11:58] if they want it disabled its easy enough [11:58] gnomefreak: maybe test what happens if you crash it :) [11:58] ... we have a testcase now again :) [11:58] ofcourse :) [11:58] Admiral_Chicago: do you know of the breakpad state? === gnomefreak almost suggested we use debians debian dir for sunbird and hack at that [11:59] but they are a bit on the lower version end [12:02] asac: use the ubuntu2.0.0.x branch for sunbird? [12:02] asuming its better than trunk [12:03] yes [12:03] should be better [12:03] though it shouldn't matter much [12:03] gnomefreak: TBH, i don't know how far those have diverged [12:04] iirc it should just be different configure options [12:04] and of course control, et al [12:04] thats what we find out tomorrow? [12:04] gnomefreak: do we have a -dom-inspector package for paradiso/trunk as well? [12:04] i think trunk does [12:04] ok then there is no difference i guess [12:04] just take whatever you have on your disk [12:04] k [12:05] oh [12:05] better use 2.0.0.x [12:05] as the patches will most likely apply [12:05] hopfully [12:05] and might be beneficial for sunbird [12:05] (though lots might be wipable)= [12:05] the smaller the better ;) [12:08] after we get sunbird to build ill make a MT branch of it [12:09] right [12:11] mozilla bug 377782 [12:11] Mozilla bug 377782 in File Handling "Simplify content-handling UI" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377782 [12:13] mozilla bug 348808 [12:14] Mozilla bug 348808 in File Handling "use application selector instead of file selector dialog when picking helper apps" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348808