=== Starting logfile irclogs/ubuntu-mozillateam.log === ubuntulog [i=ubuntulo@ubuntu/bot/ubuntulog] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === Topic for #ubuntu-mozillateam: Home of Ubuntu Mozilla Team - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam | Bug Triagers please read: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/ | Firefox trunk package source : https://code.launchpad.net/~asac/firefox/trunk | Mailing List: ubuntu-mozillateam@lists.ubuntu.com | === Topic (#ubuntu-mozillateam): set by Admiral_Chicago at Sun Jun 24 10:33:47 2007 === Admiral_Chicago_ [n=FreddyM@adsl-68-72-98-104.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === DarkMageZ [n=richard@238.101.233.220.exetel.com.au] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === jerome_ [n=jerome@gra94-2-82-66-142-60.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === ondra_AllPeers [n=smrt@81.104.95.80.ip.b26.cz] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [11:36] Admiral_Chicago: i sent him email to come here since i didnt have your email handy [11:38] asac: it failed same place same errors (just fyi) [11:49] hmm [11:49] k [11:50] should we try with a new tarball if they released one? [11:54] he? [11:54] is it official that that tarball doesn't build or what? [11:54] no === JakubLe [n=superman@81.104.95.80.ip.b26.cz] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === JakubLe [n=superman@81.104.95.80.ip.b26.cz] has left #ubuntu-mozillateam [] [12:25] heya [12:25] asac: news? [12:36] send [12:36] bluekuja: ^^^ [12:37] OoO [12:37] ;) [12:37] :) [12:37] lets see what happens [12:37] yea [12:38] asac: your mail rocks! [12:39] thanks a lot alex! :) [12:40] asac: ah [12:40] you forgot [12:40] to add motu-council [12:40] asac: so only gauvain will receive it [12:41] :D [12:41] bluekuja: i have replied all [12:41] mmm [12:41] otherwise gauvain hasn't send to mc [12:41] either [12:41] it doesn't appear in archive [12:41] bluekuja: its in CC [12:41] so all ok [12:41] ah yup [12:41] Cc: Andrea Veri , motu-council@lists.ubuntu.com, mantha@ubuntu.com, asac@ubuntu.com, vil@ubuntu.com, ivoks@ubuntu.com, zhengpeng-hou@ubuntu.com [12:41] you're right [12:41] did not see it [12:42] yup [12:42] ;) [12:50] should i be looking on MoM for merges? [12:51] mom or dad [12:51] better dad for now [12:52] so you can see if someone is already working on something [12:52] e.g you don't duplicate the work [12:53] gnomefreak, I'm leaving again for work [12:53] gonna be here later [12:53] so I can help you [12:53] :) [12:53] wher eis dad? [12:53] http://dad.dunnewind.net/universe.php [12:54] ty [12:54] np [12:54] :) [12:54] cya later! [12:57] yeah ... ubuntu mobile builds :) [12:57] aeh mobile browser i mean :) [01:00] it seems i still have 2 outstanding merges :( [01:00] asac: did you hear back on iceape-calendar from mike? [01:01] asac: also seems there is a new version of nspluginwrapper [01:05] thats odd === jerome_ [n=jerome@gra94-2-82-66-142-60.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [01:11] gnomefreak: he? [01:11] where is new nspluginwrapper? [01:11] ftp://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/pool/contrib/n/nspluginwrapper/ [01:11] im grabbing diffs and source atm [01:11] what version? [01:12] vs. what is our ? [01:12] ours is .4-2 [01:13] new is -3 [01:13] so no new upstream [01:13] no [01:13] what does changelog say? [01:13] new debian, im looking [01:15] http://pastebin.mozilla.org/113904 === jerome_ [n=jerome@gra94-2-82-66-142-60.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [01:16] i can make these changes in our build change the version in changelog and poof done [01:17] that wont work [01:19] he added a symlink patch [01:20] gnomefreak: look at merges.ubuntu.com [01:20] take it from there if it already arrived and do the merge [01:20] so you keep our changes [01:21] i grabbed our source from repos [01:22] gnomefreak: we have it in bzr [01:22] yep there too [01:22] k [01:22] i am oout for lunch in a few [01:22] should i just move the changes they made to our package? [01:22] didn't have acigarette nor coffee ... and need to shop these now [01:23] you have to merge them [01:23] go have fun im still on coffee [01:23] happy gnomefreak [01:23] :) [01:28] k lunch === jerome_ [n=jerome@gra94-2-82-66-142-60.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [02:19] asac: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nspluginwrapper/+bug/123533 let me know if it was done ok or wrong i tried following wiki and kind of hard (they shoot in all directions at one) [02:19] Launchpad bug 123533 in nspluginwrapper "nspluginwrapper merge new debian version" [Undecided,In progress] [02:20] gnomefreak: did you start from merges.ubuntu.com ? [02:20] DaD [02:20] he? [02:20] its not on merges.ubuntu.com [02:20] what does that mean? [02:20] http://dad.dunnewind.net/universe.php [02:20] its listed there [02:21] you purged my changes ... wait till it arrives on merges [02:21] if it ever will arrive [02:21] ... but i hope so [02:22] thought your changes were applied in debian when you last packaged it there [02:22] the only other change from ubuntu was the patch and they applied that in debian [02:23] i never pushed my changes to debian [02:23] you can see in diff that my changelog entry was removed by your merge [02:23] what is dad.dunnewind? [02:23] ah shit [02:24] dad tells you list of outstanding merges it reads from ftp.fr.debian.org [02:24] why does it exist? [02:24] i mean we have merges.ubuntu.com [02:24] asac: theres MoM DaD and merges.ubuntu.com [02:25] http://dad.dunnewind.net/nspluginwrapper/nspluginwrapper_0.9.91.4-2ubuntu2.patch [02:25] those are mandatory to preserve [02:25] according to changelog only [02:25] asac: nspluginwrapper sould not show up on merges.ubuntu.com as it has been merged already [02:25] nspluginwrapper-0.9.91.4.orig/utils/mkruntime.sh has been applied [02:25] gnomefreak: no it hasn't ... there is new debian release [02:25] so it should be there as well [02:26] as updated merges [02:27] anyway ... we don't really need that merge [02:27] the package doesn't bring any substantial new for us [02:27] k [02:27] but if you want to merge you have to move our diff to a patch in debian/patches/ [02:27] as debian now uses quild [02:27] quilt [02:27] MoM has a blacklist DaD doesnt reason why its not showing up on m.u.c [02:31] it turns out it shouldnt be merged that is why its not on m.u.c === jerome_ [n=jerome@gra94-2-82-66-142-60.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [02:48] hmm [02:48] intersting [02:49] gnomefreak: ok [02:49] i accept that for now [02:49] then just forget about dad :) [02:49] in future [02:50] k [02:52] ty, if you want i can re-add your changes than debdiff it [02:52] gnomefreak: just do the merge proper :) [02:52] readding manually is not proper [02:52] though it works :) [02:52] don't ask me how proper is ;) [02:52] lo [02:52] maybe its indeed manually [02:52] l [02:52] me neither :( [02:53] please figure out :) [02:53] so you can teach me ;) [02:53] k [02:53] i found the documentation completely incomprehensible [02:53] it is manually [02:53] asac: it is hard as hell to follow [02:54] thats how i ended up with what was attached to bug [02:54] what steps did you do? [02:55] ill grab bluekuja sometime this week and see if he can explain better (motu doestn seem to answer questions on some days) [02:55] bluekuja: ^^^ [02:55] please help! [02:55] i used 2 of the merging pages but i missed your changes i thought they were debian changes [02:55] but how did you miss them? [02:55] i mean the merge procedure should automatically merge them or bring you conflicts [02:55] still waking up [02:56] at that time atleast [02:56] gnomefreak: can you redo? [02:56] asac: not likely [02:56] and run script? [02:56] so i can see what you did? [02:56] asac: i can try, there is no script for merges other than to help with bug reporting and grabbing sources [02:58] i think since ubuntu changes you made were not in debian i have to ask for a sync unless i can do them myself [02:59] he? [02:59] thats nonsense [02:59] merging is about changes we have that debian hasn't [03:00] i know unless it was changed recently that is how it was done [03:01] used to be someone maybe motu or core would sync the 2 to add ubuntu changes or drop ubuntu changes [03:02] i think you don't understand [03:02] there should be no problem [03:02] if you follow merge procedure with dad [03:02] i looked at the .patch file and it has our changes [03:03] unless i really get something wrong [03:03] none of these links tell you anything about dad [03:04] and the merge isnt on MoM and as i understand it wont be [03:04] hmm ... can't use ask how to do a merge from dad? [03:04] s/use/you/ [03:04] i grabbed the source from ftp.fr.debian.... and apt-get ours [03:04] asac: i asked i didnt get an answer [03:05] thats way i said ^^ up there they dont answer questions on some days [03:07] gnomefreak: your question asked something trivial: if they added our changes ... but they didn't [03:07] they just took parts of our changes [03:07] not all [03:08] oh this script works really good :( [03:09] gnomefreak@GutsyGibbon:~/merges$ sh grab-merge.sh [03:09] Sure you want to delete all the files in /home/gnomefreak/merges [yn] ? y [03:09] so much for that idea === gnomefreak goes for smoke i may end up waiting for bluekuja [03:15] gnomefreak: that is right [03:15] you have to move the grag-merge.sh somewhere else [03:16] otherwise you will always whipe it [03:16] then you have to say [03:16] sh grab-merge.sh nspluginwrapper [03:16] asac: it wasnt grabbing sources like it should [03:16] it uses mom not dad [03:16] yeah [03:16] look into that script [03:16] should be easy to change [03:16] name it grab-merge-dad.sh [03:16] theres one for dad :) [03:16] yeah [03:16] use that [03:17] lol [03:20] this almost looks too easy === gnomefreak doesnt think its gonna do what i want but gonna try anyway [03:22] nope they just build it [03:24] seems the only conflict is debian/control [03:28] yeah ... you probably have to eliminate the change that was moved to debian/patches [03:28] just look at the debdiff [03:28] looking at report [03:28] actually the build should fail [03:28] because the new patch in debian/patches doesn't apply [03:29] only conflict that couldnt be fixe was control file [03:30] yeah build will fail [03:30] you have to unpatch the pristine source first [03:30] i have 2 patches here one with our changes and one with debian changes it looks like [03:30] e.g. remove the patch that moved to debian/patches [03:31] gnomefreak: move our patches to a patch in debian/patches/ [03:31] except the patch that has already been added there [03:32] hjmf_: there? [03:32] so i just more that file nspluginwrapper.....patch to the debian patches dir. after removing the part that they added [03:33] yes ... only diffs that don't apply to debian/ dir [03:33] of course [03:33] e.g. not the debian/control changes that are in that .patchj [03:33] those you need to apply manually again (if there are any) [03:33] k [03:34] do you see the difference? [03:34] there are changes against upstream sources ... and changes against debian/ [03:34] changes against upstream sources should now go to a patch [03:34] nspluginwrapper-0.9.91.4/src/npw-config.c upstream? [03:38] ok made changes to patch i guess go with the numbers they have 000 001 so make this 002 [03:39] like 002_ubuntu.diff === DarkMageZ [n=richard@238.101.233.220.exetel.com.au] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [03:43] name is 002_nsplugindir_install.diff [03:43] just ubuntu is lame [03:43] as it should go to debian as well at some point [03:49] ok im gonna try this see if it works and ill paste debdiff when done so you can make sure its right === gnomefre1k [n=gnomefre@adsl-221-44-127.rmo.bellsouth.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [04:03] ok that sucked === jerome_ [n=jerome@gra94-2-82-66-142-60.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === jerome_ [n=jerome@gra94-2-82-66-142-60.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [04:13] should i debdiff debians .dsc and new or our old .dsc and new? [04:16] both [04:16] and paste somewhere before uploading [04:18] ok but the 2 mihgt conflict [04:21] ok here is debdiff using 4-2ubuntu2 and 4-3ubuntu1 http://pastebin.mozilla.org/113943 [04:23] this one is debiands 4-3 against our 4-3ubuntu1 http://pastebin.mozilla.org/113944 [04:23] im gonna assume the first one is all that is needed [04:24] gnomefreak: looks almost good [04:24] howver you kept debian/ changes in patch [04:24] they don't belong there [04:24] only upstream changes as i said :) [04:25] and you didn't remove the changes that are applied in debian for it [04:25] so in general the build should fail [04:25] like it is [04:25] please fix those [04:25] and you didn't wipe our changes against upstream: nspluginwrapper-0.9.91.4.orig/src/npw-config.c [04:26] those will make the patch fail as well [04:27] that patch you added was it applie upstream? [04:29] http://pastebin.mozilla.org/113945 is the patch i added [04:29] the npw-config is the change you added that i left out in first debdiff this morning [04:31] ok i just removed the ialibs as you stated in your changelog entry [04:31] gnomefreak: no nothing was applied upstream [04:32] just the javascript stuff was added to debian/patches/ [04:32] (if you consider this upstream) [04:33] http://pastebin.mozilla.org/113945 doesnt show javascript so im confused [04:33] ^^ patch that i added to debian/patches [04:33] sorry i mean .sh [04:33] shell [04:33] not javascript [04:33] ah the last part [04:34] ok so i pull the last part out of patch [04:35] asac: line 42-44 shoudl i drop those also? [04:35] or even 40-44 [04:36] he? [04:36] that belongs to a diff against debian/ [04:36] its nothing that you could drop [04:36] its part of the diff of nspluginwrapper-0.9.91.4/debian/changelog [04:36] so leave # [04:36] so leave only in patch2: [04:36] # [04:36] unchanged: [04:37] that was odd [04:37] no ... those can be removed [04:37] right [04:37] ok [04:37] please verify that the 45-end patch is [04:37] in debian/patches/ [04:37] ... though i think it its [04:38] not with that name [04:38] only 2 patches other than ours [04:39] onlly symlink patch, the bashism patch and the one i just added [04:40] inside them none has anything that looks like 45-end [04:40] gnomefreak: its in bashism patch [04:40] ah ok [04:40] just check that that hunk is there as well [04:40] yes its there [04:40] k [04:41] you verified that the *hunk* is there as well? [04:41] looking [04:41] then all is fine [04:41] show me updated debdiffs against debian when ready [04:41] im not seeing it [04:42] http://pastebin.mozilla.org/113947 is the bashism patch [04:43] gnomefreak: its in there [04:43] try to find it :) [04:43] where? [04:43] its the error hunk [04:43] line 12ff [04:44] where did you get 45-end though? [04:44] http://pastebin.mozilla.org/113945 [04:44] ?? [04:45] dont know [04:45] then i don't understand your question [04:45] its in there [04:45] starting from line 45 [04:45] ... its cruft [04:45] oh [04:45] that has to go [04:45] as its in the patch you just showed me [04:45] 45 on debdiff paste [04:45] yes [04:46] oh ok well im gening another debdiff [04:46] if you are done there should be no diff against any upstream sources in the debdiff of debian vs. ubuntu(new) [04:46] ok [04:46] cool [04:47] and you want debain4-3 4-3ubuntu1 diff ? or 4-2ubuntu2 4-3ubuntu1 diff? [04:47] 2nd one is the biggest [04:48] example you want debdiff nspluginwrapper_0.9.91.4-2ubuntu2.dsc nspluginwrapper_0.9.91.4-3ubuntu1.dsc > nspluginwrapper_0.9.91.4.debdiff? [04:49] this merge script grabs 3 or 4 .dsc plus the one i made [04:51] http://pastebin.mozilla.org/113952 is the debdiff from command above [04:54] -Xs-Vcs-Bzr: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/nspluginwrapper/ubuntu [04:55] that was dropped [04:55] bad [04:55] +Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ia32-libs, ia32-libs-gtk, linux32 [04:55] gtk doesn't exist for us [04:55] so remove that [04:55] ok now show me diff against debian version [04:56] e.g. once you fixed both above [04:56] ok [04:57] you want me to leave ia32-libs or drop that also? [04:57] i cant access the link you gave [05:00] just what i said [05:00] gtk [05:01] gnomefreak: you can change the url to use code.launchpad.net instead of bazaar.launchpad.net [05:01] while yuo are at it [05:02] in the link you gave? [05:02] so you visit that url with browser as well [05:02] its not a link [05:02] its a diff [05:02] that you dropped [05:02] look at your debdiff [05:02] its removed [05:02] it has to stay [05:02] and maybe replace bazaar with code [05:06] http://pastebin.mozilla.org/113956 here is the ubuntu version to ubuntu version [05:07] http://pastebin.mozilla.org/113957 debian version against new ubuntu version [05:07] brb smoke [05:08] gnomefreak: you still have dropped the bzr link [05:09] and you still have nspluginwrapper-0.9.91.4/utils/mkruntime.sh [05:09] changes [05:10] did you do anything? [05:10] or are those links the old ones? [05:10] same goes for nspluginwrapper-0.9.91.4/src/npw-config.c [05:10] its still in there [05:10] drop that also? [05:10] all from 120-bottom [05:10] in http://pastebin.mozilla.org/113957 [05:11] has to go [05:11] hey ... thats what i was talking about all the time ;) [05:11] i never had the bzr link in there [05:11] yes ... which was wrong :) [05:11] we need it [05:11] as it was in the previous ubuntu version [05:11] where? [05:12] look at the ubuntu/ubuntu debdiff [05:12] and you will see [05:12] oh that one [05:15] http://pastebin.mozilla.org/113959 asac that is the patch i used the .sh part was dropped already [05:15] not understanding why diff is nt picking that up [05:15] isnt [05:15] gnomefreak: please reconsider this: we don't want *any* diffs that are not in debian/ directoy [05:16] if i drop nspluginwrapper-0.9.91.4/src/npw-config.c only thing left in patch is changelog [05:16] gnomefreak: since you added the right diff to debian/patches [05:16] gnomefreak: start from beginning [05:16] you messed things up [05:16] either you dropped the patch in debian/patches again [05:16] cd into debian and run debdiff ~/merges/nspluginwrapper....dsc other one [05:17] gnomefreak: you probably updated debian then [05:17] e.g. by accident [05:17] be sure that you have unmodified debian [05:17] a few minutes ago you had this: http://pastebin.mozilla.org/113956 [05:18] which has nspluginwrapper-0.9.91.4.orig/debian/patches/002_nsplugindir_install.diff [05:18] which is not in debian by definition [05:18] if that isn't showing up in your debdiffs then you definitly messed areound with original debian [05:18] unless you don't have it anymore now [05:18] its still in debian dir [05:18] debian/patches [05:19] get a clean debian version [05:19] ive been editing it as i go [05:19] if its not showing up then you copied it to debian's directory tree [05:19] at some point [05:20] perserve your new ubuntu version ... then wipe everything and get a clean debian one again [05:20] gnomefreak: i have no idea what you did [05:20] 10 minutes ago your debdiffs looked good [05:21] please be sure that you don't mix something up [05:22] starting over and just gonna bring stuff over as needed [05:23] what do you mean by starting over? [05:23] its not just "bringing over" ... its reverting changes as well [05:23] so you don't have any diffs against non debian/... dirs [05:23] re ran script to grab sources [05:23] ok [05:23] starting clean [05:24] ok you want nspluginwrapper-0.9.91.4/src/npw-config.c taken out of patch? [05:24] everything that is not nspluginwrapper-0.9.91.4/debian/*** has to go to a patch [05:24] in debian/patches/ [05:24] e.g. in your 002_... [05:25] expect the hunks for bashism that are already moved to a patch [05:25] http://pastebin.mozilla.org/113963 is my 002 patch as it is [05:25] that is right right? [05:26] no [05:26] if i pull the npw-config.c where is the use of the patch come in other than changelog [05:26] the debian/* stuff doesn't belong there [05:27] in debian/patches/* there *must not* be any debian/... patch [05:27] just patches against upstream sources [05:27] so i remove all of the changelog stuff [05:27] gnomefreak: it should never have ended up there [05:27] but yes [05:27] do we want the changelog stuff added by hand? [05:27] to changelog? [05:28] wait maybe its there [05:28] nvm damn [05:28] it should be there [05:28] by merge [05:28] it is [05:29] http://pastebin.mozilla.org/113964 new patch [05:34] asac: new ubuntu against ubuntu debdiff http://pastebin.mozilla.org/113965 [05:35] ok [05:35] back [05:35] now debian vs ubunt? [05:35] asac: what persia said on his mail? [05:35] http://pastebin.mozilla.org/113966 [05:35] debian vs ubutnu [05:37] asac: in fact, one vote is not the final decision [05:38] that's why there are 2 council members [05:38] gnomefreak: you still have the cruft [05:38] outside debian dir [05:38] *5 [05:38] do you see? [05:38] look at debian vs ubuntu diff [05:39] there should be no diff outside debian/ dir [05:39] gnomefreak: just try to build and you will see that it fails [05:40] it failed on thier patches [05:41] yes [05:41] because you didn't remove them [05:41] from upstream source [05:41] 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file utils/mkruntime.sh [05:41] as i said [05:41] Patch 001_remove_bashisms.diff can be reverse-applied [05:41] you still have cruft [05:41] look at the debdiff [05:41] and you will see [05:41] the patches in debian/patches are fine -> don't touch [05:41] remove the diffs against upstream sources [05:42] bluekuja: i haven't received any mail [05:42] he cced only motu-council [05:42] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/motu-council/2007-July/000214.html [05:42] here it is [05:42] give me a around line number and dont say line 89 and 90 [05:43] this debdiff is what DaD changed and what i changed btw === jerome_ [n=jerome@gra94-2-82-66-142-60.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [05:44] not to mention the script grabs 3 sources [05:44] bluekuja: do you have any decent email client and can bounce that mail to me? [05:45] e.g. not forward [05:45] -> really bounce [05:45] I use tbird [05:45] there is a bounce mail extension [05:45] search for it [05:45] ok [05:45] give me a min [05:45] gnomefreak: look at it [05:46] everything that is a diff that doesn't belong to debian/ dir has to go [05:46] i am [05:46] yes then you will find [05:46] look at debian vs ubuntu debdiff [05:46] see that is the dir im running it from [05:47] same dir that i ran ubuntu vs ubuntu [05:47] i don'tknow what you are talking about atm [05:47] the dir doesn't matter [05:47] the debdiff just contains cruft [05:47] e.g. changes that are now in a patch [05:47] all those have to go [05:49] line 90ish [05:49] maybe its getting in there when the patch is applied? [05:49] all of that [05:49] yes of course it gets in there [05:49] it has to be reverted manually [05:49] from debdiff [05:49] no its not getting in there if the debian/patches/ patch is applied [05:49] it gets in there when the automatic merge is attempted [05:49] you have to revert it [05:50] ah ok [05:50] so edit those files [05:50] its not giving you any conflicts because it just applies cleanly [05:50] revert the patch parts [05:50] the normal way is to patch it reversed [05:50] copy the patches you don't want to another file [05:50] then patch it with -R [05:51] or manually edit ... but that is a pita if you are doing huge things [05:51] e.g. copy the diffs you don't want to /tmp/donwant.patch [05:51] check those files to see if the patches are needed [05:51] then patch -p1 -R < /tmp/dontwant.patch [05:51] he? [05:51] i already checked a hundred times [05:51] those patches are duplicated atm [05:51] you have them in debian/patches/ [05:51] and you have them in general diff.gz [05:52] e.g. directly patched against upstream sources [05:52] how the hell did that happen [05:52] because those files where patched in previous version [05:52] asac: done [05:52] so the merge applied it ... and had no problem to do soe [05:52] ok so pull debians patches out [05:52] he? [05:52] no [05:52] asac: redirected to your mail [05:52] bluekuja: can you please explain gnomefreak what he has todo [05:53] the patches i dont want are in the debdiff [05:53] asac: yup [05:53] upstream moved changes from diff.gz to patches in debian/patches/ [05:53] gnomefreak, what's the problem? [05:53] those are debians 2 patches [05:53] now he has patches in debian/patches [05:53] but still upstream source is directly patched [05:53] as you can see in [05:53] http://pastebin.mozilla.org/113966 [05:53] line 91ff [05:54] yup [05:54] the patch we had against debian is already in debian/patches too [05:54] the patches that were applied are on the debdiff those are 000 and 001 both added by debian [05:54] its just to wipe all diffs that are not in debian/ directory [05:55] yes ... plus we had a patch as well [05:55] which we now moved to 002 [05:55] so everything has to go [05:55] right [05:55] gnomefreak, anyway your remaining changes are bad [05:55] define everything [05:55] gnomefreak: everything not affecting debian/ [05:55] has to go out of diff.gz [05:56] gnomefreak, are you merging now? [05:56] bluekuja: `yes [05:56] gnomefreak, a lot of changes [05:56] are not documented [05:56] in your current changelog entry [05:57] e.g [05:57] # [05:57] -Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ia32-libs, ia32-libs-gtk, linux32 [05:57] # [05:57] +Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ia32-libs, linux32 [05:57] you not document this [05:57] there are changes in a .sh file [05:57] (from the diff) [05:57] still not documented [05:57] becaue debian added it [05:57] ? [05:58] you're merging [05:58] we added it first than debian took it over [05:58] wait [05:58] current debian version has them [05:58] * Inherit "remove bashisms" patch from Ubuntu, to remove bashisms (oddly enough!) - patch by Anders Kaseorg [05:58] i had added that patch in version 4-2ubuntu2 [05:59] gnomefreak, what are you using? [05:59] e.g dad/mom [05:59] dad [05:59] ok, so [05:59] if you debdiff [05:59] current debian version [05:59] with new ubuntu one [05:59] (you merged) [05:59] question why does my ubuntu vs ubuntu look right and my debian vs ubuntu now [05:59] not [06:00] you have to debdiff [06:00] debian vs ubuntu [06:00] bluekuja: done that [06:00] and you get that? [06:00] http://pastebin.mozilla.org/113966 [06:00] is right [06:00] this looks right? http://pastebin.mozilla.org/113965 [06:00] you have to check [06:00] if its right wtf [06:00] previous entries too [06:00] look what asac said [06:01] # [06:01] * src/npw-config.c: NSPLUGIN_DIR environment can override default [06:01] # [06:01] + mozilla_system_dir and can specify custom install dir for created [06:01] # [06:01] + wrapper library [06:01] and you have it [06:01] (but you not document it) [06:01] same for * utils/mkruntime.sh: applied anti-bashism patch by Anders [06:01] you have it on your debdiff [06:01] but you not document it [06:01] you have to check for every ubuntu change [06:02] added [06:02] and report them all [06:02] checking if they are still there [06:02] (using debdiff) [06:02] it was applie in version nspluginwrapper (0.9.91.4-2ubuntu2) gutsy; urgency=low [06:02] yea [06:02] you have to report that [06:02] i did [06:02] as remaining change [06:02] no [06:02] yes [06:02] you did not [06:02] I dont see it in your changelog entry [06:03] http://pastebin.mozilla.org/113974 [06:03] its not in this version that i applied it when i applied it it was sent up already. debian took the patch and added the patch as 001 [06:03] still bad === gnomefreak not seeing bad since it was applied in verion 4-2ubuntu2 and it was uploaded all was good. now debian gets it takes the patch and applies it to thier version so do i remove 001 patch [06:05] gnomefreak, you're not understanding me [06:05] :) [06:05] gnomefreak, the last link [06:05] is what you get from? [06:05] why do i have to report anything that was already done [06:06] gnomefreak, wait [06:06] please [06:06] link me [06:06] i reported it already [06:06] all the debdiff [06:07] http://pastebin.mozilla.org/113976 [06:07] bluekuja: please take care that all the changes that are not against a debian/ directory are removed from debdiff ... i have to go out for a few [06:07] asac: ok, you gonna answer to hat mail? [06:07] http://pastebin.mozilla.org/113977 [06:07] *that [06:07] bluekuja: once i received it [06:08] asac: strange [06:08] I sent it to you [06:08] already [06:08] brb snoke [06:08] using bounce addon [06:09] asac: maybe reported as spam? [06:11] k [06:12] the 2 patches that are on the debdiff shouldnt be on debdiff so i should go in remove the parts of the patch from the files (since somehoe they got applied to source) right? [06:12] bluekuja: no should be fine [06:13] so the patch works as it should or its like double patching? [06:13] asac: mmm..strange then [06:13] gnomefreak: no they did not get applied to source somehow ... they have moved to patches/ directory ... otherwise you would have seen a merge conflict ... which is why you might be confused atm [06:13] the only merge conflict was control file [06:14] I'm a little less confused [06:14] of what are you doing [06:14] :) [06:15] that makes one of us because i didnt touch the 2 patches debian had all i did was add ours [06:15] the 002 [06:15] gnomefreak, [06:15] explain me what you did step by step please [06:16] took patch dad gave me for versiion 4-2ubuntu2 edited it and added it to debian/patches and series. changed changelog and changed control [06:17] ? [06:17] what you did? [06:17] why you touched the patch? [06:17] http://pastebin.mozilla.org/113980 patch i added [06:18] oh shit [06:18] the symlinks patch is the same i added [06:18] lol [06:18] nvm no it isnt [06:19] it patches same file though [06:19] dont touch the patch [06:19] of ubuntu version [06:19] just grab-merge [06:19] the patch ishowed you looks good right? [06:19] you added ut= [06:19] *it? [06:20] which patch system does it use? [06:20] when i used grab-merge it was named something 4-2ubuntu2.patch so i edited it and added it [06:20] quilt [06:21] gnomefreak, you dont have to touch [06:21] the patch [06:21] dad provides you [06:21] asac: told me to get rid of everyting from debian dir related [06:21] gnomefreak, answer to me [06:21] so i ended up with the npw-con... patch [06:21] bluekuja: that was meant for you [06:21] why did you touch the patch dad provides you? [06:22] bluekuja: asac told me to remove everything debian dir related from the patch dad gave me for ubuntu version not debian version [06:22] why? [06:22] bluekuja: he said it shouldnt be in there [06:23] mmmm [06:23] changelog entries and crap [06:24] mm [06:24] usually [06:24] you dont have to touch it [06:24] lets start all over let me make new dir andgrab new [06:24] yeah [06:24] ^^ [06:24] do it please [06:25] care to grab it too so you know what im doing? [06:26] yeah [06:26] give me a min [06:26] ok grabbed i got the 3 sources and a toplevel dir [06:26] ok wait me [06:26] 2 mins [06:26] k [06:31] hey folks .. i think i will do the merge then [06:31] its just not comprehensible ... i mean its not really that difficult [06:31] debian previously had not patch system [06:32] now debian introduced patch system [06:32] so everything has to go to patches [06:32] asac, is an easy one [06:32] debian already did that for everything except for our nsplugindir changes [06:32] from what I see here [06:32] asac: received my redirect? [06:32] so we have to make a patch our of it [06:32] yes [06:33] oh it works then [06:33] problem is that merge-script patches upstream sources because it of course applies like a charm [06:33] which is why you need to revert it manually [06:33] so you don't have duplicate patches [06:33] ---> all patches belong to debian/patches/ [06:33] so when you see anything in diff.gz that is outside of debian/ hierarchy it has to go [06:33] (but first check that the change is actually in some debian/patches/ file) [06:34] bluekuja: yes it works [06:34] bouncing allows me to reply now without breaking thread [06:34] oh cool [06:34] didnt know about it [06:34] its just like i received the mail directly [06:34] yeah [06:34] really nice [06:34] modern mailing lists have an option to safe mbox files from archive site [06:34] but ubuntu apparently doesn' have that option [06:35] which is a shame imo [06:35] yup [06:35] ok out again [06:35] cu later [06:35] :) [06:35] i will look ... if you finished the nspluginwrapper merge then i am happy :) [06:35] asac: me or gnomefreak ? [06:35] both [06:35] :) [06:35] :D === bluekuja starts checking [06:36] after all frigging morning i not giving up [06:36] bluekuja: please help him [06:36] read what i said in histroy [06:36] its all in there [06:36] and its not really difficula [06:36] gnomefreak has already done all [06:36] no, as I said [06:36] :) [06:36] he just has to wipe the changes from non debian/ files [06:37] e.g. so nothing else than debian/ files show up in diff.gz [06:37] hence go in source files and edit the parts that are in the patches i thought would have done that [06:39] yes [06:39] go the way you want [06:39] i just said patching with -R like described above will guard you from all problems [06:39] but i didnt understand the mocing patches that i dont want [06:39] hjmf_: when you appear ... can you drop the bug links for the debdiffs you prepared? [06:40] he? [06:40] anyway .... do what suites you best [06:40] what counts is the result ;) [06:40] not the way [06:40] :) [06:40] you said make a dir tmp/patchesdontwant [06:40] mo [06:40] no ... read again [06:40] make a patch /tmp/patchidontwant.patch [06:41] in that you paste the patches (e.g. diffs) you don't want [06:41] then you just patch them with -R [06:41] but it doesn't matter [06:41] oh [06:41] I will try to bring something up ... like: [06:41] how to revert patches you don't want :) [06:41] in wiki [06:42] i move debdiff to temp dir. than edit them than patch using the edited versions [06:42] than build than debdiff again [06:43] more or less yes [06:43] e.g. you can either remove what you want :) ... or you can create a new patch with patches/diffs that you don't want :) [06:43] the debian vs ubuntu one was the only messed up pne? [06:43] both will end up with a file with patches that you don't want [06:44] gnomefreak: its the one where you can see what you don't want [06:44] ok [06:44] of course the other is also messed up [06:44] but you cannot easily see what you don't want [06:44] asac: strange thing that dad messed up things [06:44] (it happens sometimes) [06:44] bluekuja: think about it ... it didn't mess up [06:44] in fact [06:44] it did what you want .. it merged diff into it [06:44] as you said [06:45] its the special case that diff.gz content was moved to debian/patches/ [06:45] which is why there are no conflicts [06:45] yeah [06:45] you're right [06:45] that explains [06:45] everything [07:30] damn it [07:31] brb [07:33] i might have it :) [07:36] nope damn [07:37] gnomefreak, have you followed what alex said? [07:38] yes and i got turned around but im back i should have it this time :) [07:38] :D [07:53] got it [07:53] woohoo [07:53] :) [07:54] hold that woohoo [07:54] i did it right i swear [07:54] lol [08:02] http://pastebin.mozilla.org/114023 what do you think? i tried both patching and not patching the 002_nsplugindir_install.diff but either way it shows up in debdiff since i added it [08:06] either i answered the patch questions right or wrong if wrong i can easliy redo it and answer correctly this time :) [08:07] its building binaries by the looks of it [08:08] it failed because im not on 64bit but looks good. [08:08] gnomefreak: looks reasonable right ... yes [08:08] asac: yes i think so [08:09] http://pastebin.mozilla.org/114023 [08:09] 002_nsplugindir_install.diff showing up is not a problem [08:09] good :) [08:09] actually its wanted because we added it [08:10] its just important that what you see in that patch doesn't show up again [08:10] like it did before [08:10] gnomefreak: ok ... now give me a debdiff from ubuntu to ubuntu so i can update bzr repo based on that :) [08:10] k [08:12] gnomefreak: only thing you want to do is add an explicit section that documents the diff against debian (e.g. "left mergesn:" [08:12] ) [08:12] explicit section in changelog [08:12] k [08:12] so when next merge arrives one can easily checked if anything was dropped [08:13] just look at the debdiff (debian - ubuntu) and describe what you see there [08:14] hmmmm [08:14] it reverted the patches as it should have [08:15] but at the end it added the npw-config.c patch in ubuntu vs ubuntu debdiff [08:15] i may have to redo that [08:15] no because its in debian dir [08:15] we should be good let me get this up [08:16] asac: http://pastebin.mozilla.org/114025 let me kno if i should redo this one [08:17] asac: I talked with dholbach about that guy [08:17] and he suggested me to send a mail (already sent yesterday) [08:17] to explain it [08:17] ;) [08:24] he? [08:24] bluekuja: sorry don't follow [08:25] asac: gauvain posted that comment on the base of this guy [08:25] comments [08:26] nvm :) [08:30] of which guys? [08:30] mr_pouit [08:30] or is is still anonymous? [08:30] who is that? [08:30] no no [08:30] I talked with him [08:30] he's a MOTU [08:31] is that the one you pissed at lately? [08:31] because of his comments on your debdiffs? [08:31] mmm...nope, his friend [08:31] I worked with him for a week [08:31] there you see what happens [08:31] yea [08:31] I've seen :/ [08:32] both are french [08:32] please keep any nationalism or patriotism out of this [08:32] yeah, that's not what I mean [08:33] ok [08:33] they know very well [08:33] right [08:33] and he pointed it out [08:33] my discussion [08:33] (via pm) [08:33] with him === bashelier [n=bashelie@srv122.hosteur.com] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [08:33] (the one of debdiffs comments) [08:33] yeah ... i knew somehow :) [08:34] in any case ... even if you are not accepted you probably will not get rejected, but just deferred [08:34] so don't care for it [08:34] yea [08:34] just show that you can do better [08:34] asac: attached debdiff to bug 123533 with the updated changelog (changelog could be better on the patch reverting part) :( thats what i came up with im still kind of burnt out from this damn thing [08:34] Launchpad bug 123533 in nspluginwrapper "nspluginwrapper merge new debian version" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/123533 [08:34] asac: anyway 4 votes are missing [08:34] gnomefreak: congrats [08:34] gnomefreak: you did well [08:34] ty :) [08:35] ty for the help bluekuja and asac [08:35] at last :) [08:35] lol [08:35] gnomefreak: next time it gets better [08:35] gnomefreak, np [08:35] feel free to ask [08:35] everytime [08:35] i hope it does get better [08:35] finally you got more experienced to look at diffs, right? === Sp4rKy [n=Sp4rKy@ubuntu/member/sp4rky] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [08:36] e.g. can you read the debdiff you produced? [08:36] asac: anyway, I can't understand latest comment by emmet [08:36] gnomefreak: e.g. what changes exist ... and what file they affect? [08:36] it does not make sense [08:36] bluekuja: please ... get over it ... i will add one more comment and then wait [08:37] asac: yup [08:37] all he said is that it makes sense to look closer if there is any negative feedback from a mc member [08:37] asac: you know how I'm done [08:37] for this stuff [08:37] sure [08:38] and usually I feel really sad [08:38] (which is bad) [08:38] don't do that [08:38] right [08:38] just concentrate on what you are doing :) [08:38] not on what others are doing ;) [08:38] yeah, that's the right thing to do [08:38] but sometimes [08:38] bluekuja: maybe look at the sven luther case in debian [08:39] for NM? [08:39] and you will learn why people get allergic if someone tries to convince anyone [08:39] no a DD who got thrown out lately [08:39] oh [08:39] what he did? [08:39] just search for sven luther in google :) [08:39] yes i do know what the changes are and what files (after looking at the for 6hours i better) [08:40] yeah, searching right now :D [08:40] he just did not stop pushing his opinion on anyone [08:40] if you disagreed or stated an opinion he couldn't follow he would repeat his arguments over and over again [08:41] asac: he's not more a DD then? [08:41] for that [08:42] http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2007/03/threads.html#00241 [08:42] how does a vote make you able to declair yourself a leader :( [08:42] read a few on that page [08:42] its not all ... since some are only in -private [08:42] bluekuja: he has been expulsed [08:42] aww [08:42] bluekuja: and finally he has even been banned from all debian lists [08:42] and irc [08:43] 0_9 [08:43] and if that happens in debian then its really hard [08:43] *0_0 [08:43] i mean ... people say: thats censoring et al === bluekuja reading [08:45] its not easy to find ... if you go to debian-project archive ... there should be length threads [08:45] where you can better see how he replies to each and everyone [08:45] always saying the same things [08:46] as if people didn't understand what he said [08:46] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/FransPopAndOthersVs.SvenLutherIssue/SvenLutherThinking [08:46] yeah [08:46] found that too [08:46] there has even been a wiki page set up for that [08:47] one of the many mediation attempts [08:47] all started that fras pop revoked his commit rights to debian-installer [08:47] which he refused to accept [08:47] looks like glibc was uploaded [08:47] in the end frans pop left the project because of this constant attacks [08:48] frans was a DD too? [08:48] yeah ...lead of debian-installer [08:48] oh how much i hate those auto replies to emails :( [08:48] auto replies? [08:48] sven luther was a famous DD then [08:48] for his work I mean [08:49] debian-installer is a really important package [08:49] and part [08:49] no [08:49] yeah guy on debian bug 297293 has one set [08:49] Debian bug 297293 in mozilla-thunderbird "mozilla-thunderbird: profiles imported from (older) mozilla mailnews might fail to copy mail to Sent-Folder" [Important,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/297293 [08:49] sven luther just did the powerpc port [08:49] oh [08:49] frans pop was the lead [08:49] where it replies with out of office [08:49] oh, so I did only powerpc port [08:49] *he [08:50] there are huge discussions [08:50] yeah ... about 80% the mails of last year i would guess [08:50] and even more on debian-private [08:50] which is not public [08:50] (luckily) [08:51] who got debian-private access? [08:51] DD [08:52] oh k [08:52] its usually to announce vacations [08:52] oh :D [08:52] cool [08:52] but its actually the place were discussion takes place that hurts feelings and attacks others et al [08:52] not a good place after all [08:56] gnomefreak: yeah .. auto-reply is a major issue [08:56] you are luck if you don't get endless bouncing [08:56] like we had once ;) [08:58] ok out for an hour or so [08:58] have fun [08:58] cu later [08:58] ;) [08:59] signal 5 is X related [08:59] by the looks of it [08:59] asac: when you get back see bug 122858 for signal 5 and sebs conclusion [08:59] Launchpad bug 122858 in firefox "[gutsy] firefox crash on a _XError" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/122858 === gnomefreak should go rest :( [09:02] yeah its not a glib bug [09:02] my bet its compiz [09:03] i would agree on that === asac_ [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === jerome_ [n=jerome@gra94-2-82-66-142-60.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === cjwatson_ [n=cjwatson@82-69-40-219.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [11:09] asac: you around or still off? [11:18] sure [11:18] oh bug 123622 [11:18] Launchpad bug 123622 in firefox "Add third party default prefs to firefox" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/123622 [11:18] im thinking thats just looking for issues [11:19] telephone [11:19] k [11:24] actually i don't see the point [11:24] its already possible [11:24] please comment if you get time :) [11:24] just install a .js file inside that [11:25] invalidated [11:25] if he claims its not possible ping me again [11:25] k [11:26] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubufox [11:26] you got it done? [11:26] yes [11:26] waiting for build to finish to smash it through binary NEW [11:26] then i can upload new firefox [11:27] that drops lots of ubuntu-* patches [11:27] sweet [11:27] you have a branch for ubufox? [11:27] yes [11:27] https://code.launchpad.net/ubufox/ [11:27] main is just ubufox [11:27] and ubuntu is the package [11:28] k [11:28] ty ill play a bit with it [11:28] did you upload nsplugin stuff to branch? === gnomefreak has 3 dirs with nsplugin builds and i cant remember what one was good one [11:29] hmm you mean update? [11:29] no not yet [11:29] i will do nsplugin update tomorrow [11:29] morning [11:29] ok [11:30] http://people.ubuntu.com/~asac/git-repo/mobile.browser.1.8.git/ [11:30] :) [11:30] damn you have been busy [11:31] i have been more busy figuring out how to setup the branch repo than actually bootstrapping the mobile browser [11:31] basically its still firefox [11:31] but you configure with --enable-application=midbrowser [11:31] instead of browser [11:31] i am still unsure if git repo is really how its ment to be done :/ [11:31] cool [11:32] gnomefreak: btw, you remember the canvas build failure? [11:32] it happens with firefox as well [11:32] its that you have to use system-cairo in order to make it succeed [11:33] i think so [11:33] apparently the in-source cairo is borked that ships with firefox 2.0 [11:33] it is [11:33] its causing crashes [11:33] (e.g. same for sunbird 0.5) [11:33] maybe not insource but libcario is [11:33] so where did we fail now for sunbird? [11:33] asac: same place same error [11:33] yes ... i don't remember the exact error [11:33] do you have link at hand? [11:34] /lastlog pastebin will bring me lots of links :( [11:34] i doubt it let me check [11:34] http://gnomefreak.pastebin.ca/596546 [11:34] is that current build error? [11:35] one of more use on mozilla pastebin but not sure of the link [11:35] ah right ... this crazy autocomplete thing [11:35] wierd stuff [11:35] ill build in a bit and upload a new error log if you need [11:35] no ... it will probably fail [11:35] gnomefreak: please push to a private branch [11:35] so i can build what you have [11:35] i really have to play around a bit to find what is missing [11:35] ok give me afew [11:39] no i seem to not beable to :( [11:39] bzr: ERROR: Unable to connect to SSH host bazaar.launchpad.net; EOF during negotiation [11:40] EOF end of file? [11:44] he? [11:44] yes [11:44] but that doesn'matter [11:44] how did you try to push? [11:47] wtf [11:47] [Errno 13] Directories directly under a user directory must be named after a product name registered in Launchpad . [11:47] so much for that [11:48] bzr push --create-prefix sftp://gnomefreak@bazaar.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/sunbird/ubuntu-0.x [11:48] change sunbird to trunk? [11:49] hmm [11:49] no not sunbird [11:49] aeh don't change i mean [11:49] hmm [11:49] push as ubuntu-1.8.x [11:49] or ... just push as ubuntu [11:50] as we will probably not maintain other branches [11:50] and its unsure what release policy upstream has [11:50] so go for just ubuntu [11:50] i guess the EOF was just a temporary issue [11:50] the url looks good that you used [11:51] next time just try ubuntu instead of ubuntu-0.x [11:51] it was [11:51] none of it works [11:51] gnomefreak@GutsyGibbon:~/gutsy_builds/work/sunbird-0.x/debian$ bzr push --create-prefix sftp://gnomefreak@bazaar.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/sunbird/ubuntu [11:51] Enter passphrase for key '/home/gnomefreak/.ssh/id_dsa': [11:51] bzr: ERROR: Permission denied: '/~gnomefreak/sunbird/ubuntu': [Errno 13] Directories directly under a user directory must be named after a product name registered in Launchpad [11:52] can we register it without well it [11:52] you have to register [11:52] why haven't you? [11:52] just do :) [11:52] i didnt know i had to [11:52] lol [11:52] register sunbird [11:52] project [11:52] set mozillateam as driver [11:52] done [11:54] name and display name as sunbird? [11:54] yes ... for now its ok [11:55] we can change later [11:55] don't care about description for now [11:55] just set it as subproject of mozilla [11:55] you remember? [11:55] :) [11:55] we looked at the list of registered trash there [11:55] because we talked about registering sunbird [11:55] :) [11:56] ah yes [11:57] https://launchpad.net/sunbird :) [11:58] yeah thats good [11:58] now push your initial code ;) [11:58] im trying [11:59] its just sitting there this could be good sign === gnomefreak goes for smoke while this thing does whatever it does [11:59] its pushing :) [12:06] it will be here when its done https://code.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/sunbird/ubuntu-0.x [12:07] so you used 0.x ? [12:07] hmm ok [12:07] yeah [12:07] it was on the scroll back [12:08] and deleting 4 characters from the back was too much ... boah [12:08] :-P [12:08] lol [12:08] anyway ... i consider this a temporary branch anyway ... you can remove or hide or something once mozillateam branch is up [12:08] true === Admiral_Chicago_ [n=FreddyM@adsl-68-72-94-248.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [12:09] i am really unhappy that i committed the trunk tarball once [12:09] this is why pushing initial takes ages now [12:09] because it uploads a 35mb tarball that is never used [12:09] unfortunately we cannot remove that revision :/ [12:10] the tarball is branched? [12:10] the initial trunk branch i created had the embedded tarball in it ... remember? [12:10] ah yes [12:10] i branched from that branch for firefox ubuntu-2.0.0.x [12:10] and so on [12:11] so we still carry it around [12:11] as bzr always downloads everything [12:11] yep [12:11] even tbird branch has it [12:11] and paradiso [12:11] its all in there ;) [12:11] the invisible handicap we carry around [12:11] ;) [12:11] you can get rid of it [12:11] he? [12:12] without doing a new branch [12:12] ssh into the branch and remove the .bzr file [12:12] no [12:12] haha [12:12] you still have to upload [12:12] no === Admiral_1hicago_ [n=FreddyM@adsl-68-72-90-122.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [12:12] i ouwld have to redo everything [12:12] e.g. merge everything over that is not the tarball checkin [12:12] i don't dare todo that [12:12] and its always only on initial push/pull that its a problem [12:13] right [12:13] and since we deal with huge tarballs everyday [12:13] its not really much added work [12:14] i can make this branch mozillateam branch [12:14] :) [12:14] i can change the ending too im sure [12:24] you can ... but please don't until this builds [12:24] then we should clean up revisions so that there are not so many commits (e.g. at best all the complete package rename to one big commit) [12:24] can we clean them up? [12:24] once we get this build we can do the clean up together so you can push [12:24] yes [12:24] it commited 64 by default [12:25] and 64 is a big one [12:25] because its not yet officially published [12:25] which is why i want to hold back mozillateam branch publishing ... which i consider official for us [12:25] yep [12:28] http://people.ubuntu.com/~asac/Screenshot-Add-ons.png [12:28] ubufox :) [12:28] not really a big attraction ;) ... but its there [12:28] :) [12:29] i had to grab the orig and dsc and diff for that [12:29] to build ubufox? [12:29] yeah === gnomefreak doesnt have tarball [12:29] you can just branch the ubuntu branch [12:29] then say: [12:29] bzr bd --split . [12:29] but in general you should better download the tarball to your tarballs directory [12:30] so its the same [12:30] especially if you plan to push this to preview [12:30] bzr bd --split . will create a orig for you [12:30] (just for your info) [12:30] oh [12:30] damn [12:30] but ... the tarball will probably differ in md5sum [12:30] from what i uploaded [12:31] so better use the one you can download from launchpad etm [12:31] amt [12:31] atm [12:31] damn [12:31] http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8283205/ubufox_0.2.orig.tar.gz [12:31] its 22k :) [12:31] so not a big thing [12:31] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+source/ubufox this tar [12:31] but then use the bzr branch [12:31] the link i provided [12:31] guess its from there ... yes [12:31] got it [12:32] ill set it up now i hope [12:32] you can also branch the main branch and run sh build.sh [12:32] then you will get an .xpi [12:32] which you can install as user === Admiral_Chicago [n=FreddyM@adsl-68-72-101-70.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [12:39] i still want to build debs for preview right? [12:39] or .xpi? === gnomefreak builing on gutsy first so i can play [12:42] i don't know ... the extension is probably not worth much in feisty now [12:42] even in gutsy its not [12:42] bzr bd --merge . is the command right? [12:42] just if you use latest firefox which doesn't have the ubuntu pref tweaks anymore [12:42] you don't need merge [12:42] i keep forgetting --merge [12:42] oh ok [12:42] because its not just debian layout [12:42] its all in there [12:43] gnomefreak: remember: --merge if you have debian/ -only layout [12:43] ah ok [12:43] if upstream source is included as well, then you don't need it [12:44] lol its a FTB === gnomefreak wonders why [12:45] you don't fullfill package depdenencies? [12:46] maybe [12:46] its not failing there but ill see [12:46] how would i know ther eis no debian dir [12:46] hehe [12:46] you branched main branch then [12:47] which is actually upstream source [12:47] you need core-dev branch [12:47] e.g. ubuntu [12:47] you didnt have another one that i saw on your LP page goes back to branch right one [12:47] https://code.launchpad.net/ubufox/ [12:47] the ubuntu one is in realm of core-dev [12:47] i am just upstream author [12:47] its always better to look at code page of project [12:48] and not of team/person [12:48] good point [12:48] i could have done this as a native package ... e.g. not with orig.tar.gz [12:48] but i hope i can make something out of it that is good for other distributors as well [12:48] its pushed [12:48] which is why i split it up in upstream branch [12:49] and ubuntu branch [12:49] he? [12:49] the sunbird branch [12:50] ah great [12:50] i will pull it in a minute [12:50] can you please add mozilla-bugs as bug contact for ubufox package? [12:50] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+source/ubufox [12:50] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+source/ubufox [12:50] damn [12:50] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubufox/ [12:50] yep i can [12:50] thats the page [12:51] just the one? [12:51] yes [12:51] that was fast [12:52] done [12:52] great [12:55] ok sunbird build is going ... lets see what happens [12:55] good luck [12:55] ;) [12:55] let me know what you find [12:56] sure [12:56] i will send you a patch :) [12:56] but lets see how fast it fails [12:56] javascript engine appears to build like a charm :) ... naturally of course [12:56] eh i dont think you will need a patch i still thinging configure options but shhhh [12:56] it failes damn near end of it [12:56] -e [12:57] not patch like in patch in debian/patches [12:57] patch like bzr diff :) [12:57] ah ok that will work [12:57] brb smoke [12:57] sure [01:02] btw how do you read when it moves so damn fast [01:07] i see them :) [01:07] i know where to look [01:07] e.g. i can see [01:07] lude ../../../../mozilla-config.h -Wp,-MD,.deps/nsLeafBoxFrame.pp nsLeafBoxFrame.cpp [01:07] so i know its buildding something in layout engine [01:08] if you look of the bottom of the terminal you often can see what file is currently build [01:08] if its really fast you might see the pattern e.g. it creates .jar files or something like that [01:09] ah ok [01:09] yeah i catch bits and peices of it [01:10] yeah ... if you looked often enough you will recogize :) [01:10] especially if you looked at most of those files once [01:10] and if you know exactly what modules exist in code its getting easier to identify at least some that you know