[03:35] <calc> anyone know if the 3945 wireless is fixed in gutsy yet?
[04:04] <BenC> fixed?
[04:04] <BenC> it's worked throughout gutsy for me
[04:31] <calc> BenC: oh ok
[04:31] <calc> well afaik it has never worked for me, feisty's works fine though
[04:32] <calc> i'm not sure where to start looking to determine why it doesn't work though
[04:33] <calc> it is going from 2.6.20 -> 2.6.22 though so its possible it is something else breaking it besides the driver itself
[04:39] <mjg59> BenC: I'm still entirely unable to pull from the gutsy git tree in any sane way
[04:41] <kylem> it keeps getting rebased.
[04:41] <mjg59> So what do I do?
[04:41] <kylem> fetch into a new branch and reset to the new head
[04:41] <mjg59> (Other than blow away my tree)
[04:42] <mjg59> kylem: Ouch.
[04:42] <mjg59> Can't we just avoid rebasing?
[04:43] <kylem> git fetch origin master:tmp; git reset --hard $(git-show-ref master | awk '{print $1}') or something
[04:43] <kylem> er, s/master/tmp/ in the second bit
[07:22] <lifeless> mjg59: git is not bzr :)
[08:59] <kraut> moin
[10:54] <ogra> hi, can anyone tell me if dropping of the oss headers was our decision or upstreams ?
[10:55] <ogra> (things like soundcore.h and ac97.h are missing from the recent headers/source)
[02:15] <zul> morning
[03:29] <jeromeg> hello
[03:29] <jeromeg> could someone tell me if bug 52846
[03:29] <jeromeg> is really a bug ?
[03:30] <jeromeg> it's about kernel headers and a possible missing file from the kernel tree
[03:32] <kylem> well, they're explicitly not exported, so what userland code needs it?
[03:34] <jeromeg> dunno, 'im just triaging old bugs
[03:35] <kylem> likely he's missing build-depends and assumes that's where it should come from
[03:35] <kylem> (but in reality, there's probably a library providing a sanitized header.)
[03:36] <jeromeg> kylem : so I can close this ?
[03:37] <kylem> i marked it as incomplete for now.
[03:37] <jeromeg> kylem : thx
[03:37] <kylem> np.
[03:37] <kylem> thanks for bringing it up.
[03:37] <jeromeg> np
[06:48] <zul> BenC: ping
[10:50] <holycow> hi guys
[10:50] <holycow> can anyone comment on whether or not the intel 945 gu chipset is supported by any kernel yet? particularly say the feisty kernel?
[10:58] <JanC> what do you mean by "gu" ?
[10:58] <holycow> http://www.dynamism.com/u8240/specs.shtml
[10:58] <holycow> i was curious about that too
[10:59] <holycow> never heard of a 945gu express chipset
[11:00] <kylem> i have no idea what that is.
[11:00] <JanC> it's probably just a variation of the normal 945
[11:00] <holycow> *nod*
[11:00] <JanC> with a new name invented for marketing purposes  :)
[11:00] <kylem> i've heard of 945GM and 945GT...
[11:00] <holycow> i'm probably going to buy that device anyway and give it a go ... but thought to ask first
[11:00] <kylem> feisty probably needs pci id updates for it.
[11:01] <holycow> when i get it in, i would be a willing guinea pig :)
[11:01] <holycow> but they are short ordered so that will take a while
[11:01] <kylem> yeah, feel free to poke me about it if it does give you trouble
[11:01] <holycow> danke :)
[11:01] <JanC> seems like it's the "ultra mobile" version
[11:02] <kylem> it seems tobe a new part.
[11:03] <holycow> yeah
[11:03] <holycow> appearently the a110 cpu is a chopped down dothan with a tiny cache
[11:04] <holycow> the cpu is supposed to be a stop gap until they get a true low power cpu out next year
[11:04] <JanC> the PDF linked from http://www.intel.com/design/mobile/specupdt/309220.htm says some things about "April 2007 - Added information for the Ultra Mobile 945GU Express Chipset GMCH 82945GU."
[11:04] <kylem> indeed: http://www.intel.com/products/mid/ultramobile2007.htm
[11:04] <holycow> i presume they did the same thing with the chipset to match the sliced up cpu
[11:05] <kylem> not quite as much to change there.. it's likely just a refresh to cope with a slower fsb.
[11:25] <holycow> thanks guys 
[11:25] <holycow> later