[12:28] can you paste the original patch as well please ? [12:28] e.g. the one that is still in debian/patches ? [12:28] yes [12:28] gnomefreak: you sure you saved? [12:28] I don't see any PROGRAM lines in that diff [12:28] http://pastebin.mozilla.org/114364 [12:29] asac: yes i was looking at that too let me see [12:29] you didn't save [12:30] as you can see the diff for mozilla.orig/browser/app/Makefile.in is now completely missing in your new quilt diff [12:30] http://pastebin.mozilla.org/114367 [12:30] please do the change [12:30] still missing and yes i saved [12:30] i did already [12:30] look into that file again [12:30] (open in new editor) [12:31] ifeq ($(USE_SHORT_LIBNAME), 1) [12:31] PROGRAM = $(MOZ_APP_NAME)-trunk$(BIN_SUFFIX) [12:31] else [12:31] PROGRAM = $(MOZ_APP_NAME)-trunk-bin$(BIN_SUFFIX) [12:31] endif [12:32] you sure you are in right directory tree? [12:32] yes i opened it up new and save never saved it === gnomefreak thinks gedit issue [12:32] ah [12:32] please save it :) [12:32] when your change shows up in quilt diff ... let me know :) [12:33] http://pastebin.mozilla.org/114369 [12:33] yeah ... that looks better [12:33] i did save it the whole time :( [12:33] ok ... updating patch is now really simple ;) [12:33] just do [12:33] quilt refresh --diffstat -U8 [12:34] in mozilla dir still i take it [12:34] ok refreshed [12:34] do it whereever you ran quilt diff [12:34] ok ... now you can stay in that directory and see if all other patches apply as well [12:34] (e.g. lets excercise quilt a bit) [12:34] k [12:34] run quilt top [12:35] it should show you the currently top-most patch applied [12:35] (which should be trunk-fsh) [12:35] trunk-fsh [12:35] you see that? [12:35] yeah [12:35] run quilt series [12:35] what do you see? [12:35] 3 of them [12:35] the whole series, right? [12:35] no-have-stdint-h-ftbfs.patch [12:35] trunk-fsh [12:35] ftbfs-with-branding-dir [12:35] yes [12:36] that should be all patches listed in series [12:36] you can do quilt applied [12:36] to see which ones are currently applied [12:36] although there are 5 or so in debian/patches so i may get rid of the non used patches [12:36] yeah ... might be that i removed them from series weithout removing the in patches [12:36] no-have-stdint-h-ftbfs.patch [12:36] trunk-fsh [12:36] yeah ... and unapplied? [12:36] missing one [12:36] -> quilt unapplied [12:37] ftbfs-with-branding-dir [12:37] which is what we expected, right? [12:37] why did we expect that one to not be applied [12:37] because the trunk-fsh failed [12:37] other than the other 2 were wuilt applied [12:37] ah ok [12:37] we now applied it manually [12:38] and now we can apply the last one with [12:38] quilt push [12:38] try that [12:38] does it fail? [12:38] its patched [12:38] cool [12:38] ok ... don't go out [12:38] just get a feeling for what quilt does [12:38] try quilt pop [12:38] then look at unapplied and applied again [12:38] then do another pop [12:38] hey [12:39] pop redoes the last thing you did ? [12:39] or just last patch applied [12:39] pop unapplies what is currently on top [12:39] ah ok [12:39] with pop you unapply ... with push you apply [12:39] you can pop all by [12:39] quilt pop -a [12:39] then all patches should be in unapplied [12:40] and applied should be none [12:40] do you see? [12:40] then you can apply all again by quilt push -a [12:40] :) [12:40] yes [12:40] after that all should be in applied [12:40] and non in unapplied [12:40] ok ...fine [12:40] the trunk-fsh patch is not fixed and applies cleanly [12:41] just ensure that you copy it to the debian/patches directory of bzr tree [12:41] (so you don't loose it) [12:41] not fixed because we need to add quilt diff inplace of whats there? [12:41] no [12:41] oh [12:41] you did quilt refresh [12:41] that updated the patch for you [12:41] its already fine [12:41] cool [12:41] otherwise you would not be able to pop [12:41] or push it [12:41] makes sense [12:42] cool :) [12:42] well done [12:42] you merged the patch ;) [12:42] :) sweet ty [12:42] now lets see if it works [12:42] yeah (but please remember that bzr bd wipes your build-area) [12:42] so copy the new trunk-fsh patch there [12:42] im using dpkg-buildpackage [12:42] you can of course just build in build-area [12:42] right [12:43] (but don't forget to copy it) [12:43] :) [12:43] copy it [12:43] to bzr tree ... so its preserved [12:43] (unless you are in bzr of course) :) [12:43] i don't know how you build ... and i don't really care ;) [12:43] wait you mean the .bzr dir? [12:43] or you mean push to branch? [12:43] gnomefreak: commit the new patch :) [12:44] ah yes [12:44] do you use bzr bd or not? [12:44] if you don't use bzr bd ... its just commit [12:44] and publish it [12:44] once the build went well [12:44] (probably not before) [12:45] gnomefreak: so basically what you did was the same what you do when you do a merge [12:45] e.g. manually applying changes that patch is to stupid to apply [12:48] ok lets try this again :) [12:48] you can just use [12:48] dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -nc [12:48] to go on [12:49] e.g. without unpacking and stuff like that [12:49] is fucking mp3 player is driving me nuts [12:50] it just refuses to get back to a sane state after you disconnnet it without pulling the plug [12:51] who knows ... maybe it just cannot reconfigure at all [12:51] and i have to write a server that keeps line up until the plug is physically reset [12:54] am i still here? [12:55] lag is hitting me again [12:56] irc lag? [12:57] yeah ... but apparently my connection worked well [12:58] gnomefreak: do you have access to a windows box? [12:58] no [12:58] win box is all fudged up from what im hearing i told her id get to it this weekend so shes using laptop until than [12:59] i already have lag [12:59] i probably will not survive long [01:00] gnomefreak: let me know when you have access to win :) [01:00] i just need to get a spec that is only shipped in .exe [01:00] which i cannot extract [01:00] http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms867188.aspx [01:00] there is the spec [01:00] these bastards [01:02] i hate ms so much [01:02] these ignorant bastards [01:02] hopefully they will suffocate from in their own ignorance [01:02] why are you using it :) [01:03] i don't use it [01:04] i want to enable these shitty devices they force upon the world on linux [01:04] almost all high-end mp3 players use MTP [01:04] nowadays [01:04] no usb-storage anymore [01:04] everything that is more than a mp3-stick [01:04] is mtp [01:04] ah [01:05] brb smoke now that i got this to start === cjwatson_ [n=cjwatson@82-69-40-219.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [01:56] bug 123829 [01:56] Launchpad bug 123829 in dhcp "Latest Gutsy Upgrade does not connect to DHCP anymore." [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/123829 === DarkMageZ [n=richard@238.101.233.220.exetel.com.au] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [02:37] probably a network manager issue ./ [02:37] :/ [03:26] grrrrrr [03:31] asac: can you please test bug 123882 on feisty 64bit when you get time [03:31] Launchpad bug 123882 in firefox "Some web sites reload infinitely, but not on Opera" [Low,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/123882 [03:32] gnomefreak: not reproducible .. added comment [03:33] ah ok ty i added one he had said more than 1 site so i wanna see the others [03:33] asac: trunk failed to build [03:34] i will look into it more in the morning im going to bed === DarkMageZ [n=richard@238.101.233.220.exetel.com.au] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [08:04] asac: I've submitted bug 123926 [08:04] Launchpad bug 123926 in totem "added Xb-Npp-xxx tags accordingly to "firefox distro add-on suport" spec" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/123926 === hjmf_ 's out for the morning [08:04] cu === shirish [n=shirish@59.95.54.99] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === shirish [n=shirish@59.95.54.99] has left #ubuntu-mozillateam [] === shirish [n=shirish@59.95.32.111] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === shirish [n=shirish@59.95.32.111] has left #ubuntu-mozillateam [] === gnomefreak is in for a while [10:54] hjmf_: great [10:54] i just want to verify that plugin-id is the right one ... then i push it [10:54] lets see [10:56] asac: is there a way to crash firefox just for shits and giggles? === gnomefreak doesnt seem to be affected by libcairo(if causing crashes) [11:01] this is annoying as hell [11:04] gonna see if restarting fixes this brb === jerome___ [n=jerome@gra94-2-82-66-142-60.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [11:16] who has ~256mb ram that i can borrow to test something? [11:22] why is it no matter what string i search for i can never find upstream bugs maybe i need to search for somethin unrelated :( [11:22] gnomefreak: you say its because of too little mem? [11:22] gnomefreak: what bug do you try to triage? [11:22] i get crash and it cant send crash report due to not enough memory [11:23] bug 80964 [11:23] Launchpad bug 80964 in mozilla-thunderbird "MASTER mozilla-thunderbird crashed [@nsNSSCertificateDB::ImportCertsFromFile] " [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/80964 [11:34] asac: do you remember seeing a thunderbird crash while deleting Imap message? i found upstream and i thought i remembered seeing it. [11:37] hjmf_: all sponsored ... rock! [11:38] hjmf_: i had to adapt changelog because uploads happened in the meantime ... though my bad [11:39] gnomefreak: can you please verify that this crash happens with latest upstream binary release as well? [11:39] gnomefreak: otherwise, they will probably hunt us down :) [11:39] k [11:39] if we post upstream [11:40] hjmf_: would be great if you could verify tonight that the packages succeeded to build [11:43] let me know when you have a few minutes strange feeling we are gonna need a few patches for trunk === jeromeg_ [n=jerome@gra94-2-82-66-142-60.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [11:46] gnomefreak: yeah ... i always have a few minutes for you ;) [11:46] :) [11:46] well your not gonna like this im sure http://pastebin.mozilla.org/114392 === jeromeg [n=jerome@gra94-2-82-66-142-60.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [11:54] gnomefreak: first think you should do if things fail on trunk is to look in bonsai [11:54] if there has been a checkin after that .... if it fails for all [11:55] there is most likely a checkin that fixes this pretty quick [11:55] http://bonsai.mozilla.org/ [11:55] look what was checked in last week in mozilla/toolkit/xre directory [11:55] on HEAD [11:55] maybe you just need to take a new snapshot [11:55] and things will be done [11:56] (that said: from a first glance, this looks like a bug in Makefile.in of that directory) [12:06] hmmmm i cant open links from irssi anymore :( [12:08] asac: do i want to look in thunderbirdtinderbox? [12:10] why thunderbird? [12:10] its firefox trunk that fails, right? [12:10] gnomefreak: open the bonsai url above [12:10] you can fill in the fields [12:10] e.g. just set the directory like above [12:10] ensure that Branch is HEAD (should be default) [12:10] oh damn [12:11] and set how far you want to look in the past (e.g. today, week, month, since beginning of time) [12:11] usually a week should give you enough info [12:13] it lists the same as the thunderbird search i did by mistake [12:13] http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsquery.cgi?treeid=default&module=MozillaBranchTinderboxAll&branch=HEAD&branchtype=match&dir=mozilla%2Ftoolkit%2Fxre&file=&filetype=match&who=&whotype=match&sortby=Date&hours=2&date=week&mindate=&maxdate=&cvsroot=%2Fcvsroot [12:18] should i diff http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/toolkit/xre/Makefile.in against the makefile.in from the source i have? oh and i dont know how to do snapshots :( [12:19] thunder crashes upstream as well === asac_ [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [12:23] sprry this sucky connection is shaky again === asac_ [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [12:24] i dont see anything that jumps out and smacks me in face with this FTB [12:30] gnomefreak: do you have build failure again? [12:30] i lost my irssi history [12:30] heya guys [12:31] bluekuja: hey [12:31] asac_: is possible to add something to previous changelog's entries? [12:31] documenting it in new one [12:31] bluekuja: imo yes ... but you should document that in new ... yes [12:31] asac_: I'll do that for regex [12:32] seems it's what we need [12:32] yes right ... fix the changelog to be more readable and add it to outstanding merges [12:32] asac_: I prepare a diff and I push it on pastebin [12:32] for you [12:33] of the merge changelog [12:33] asac_: http://pastebin.mozilla.org/114392 build failure [12:36] if this connection resets one more time ... i will go kamikaze [12:36] i see lag already [12:36] still here? [12:36] ping [12:37] gnomefreak: ?? [12:37] am i still here? [12:37] yes [12:37] did you get the failure? [12:38] asac_: you still here or did you get dissconnected again [12:39] yeah i am here [12:39] please cross-fingers that i stay for an hour or so [12:39] k good [12:39] until this mozilla bzr branch is completely scp'ed to people.ubuntu.com at lsat [12:39] what branch is this? [12:40] mobile [12:40] ah [12:40] a complete 350M branch [12:40] e.g. not just debian [12:40] omg that is huge [12:40] like what i did for git ... but using bzr [12:40] gnomefreak: http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsquery.cgi?treeid=default&module=all&branch=HEAD&branchtype=match&dir=mozilla%2Ftoolkit%2Fxre&file=&filetype=match&who=&whotype=match&sortby=Date&hours=2&date=week&mindate=&maxdate=&cvsroot=%2Fcvsroot [12:40] if you look there [12:40] there is a change to Makefile.in [12:41] he? [12:41] its not really huge [12:41] anyway ... its broken [12:41] upstream is broken? [12:41] yeah ... look at the libs:: line they added [12:41] they should have done the same for install [12:41] so lest do a quilt patch for that [12:41] you ready? [12:41] have tree that failed lying around? [12:42] give me 1 minute to get set up for it [12:43] ok do i need to be in build-tree? === gnomefreak there since we did that lastnight :) [12:44] ok ready when you are :) [12:52] ok [12:52] you have to go to build-tree [12:52] mozillla [12:52] you in that directory? [12:52] yep [12:53] please verify with quilt applied /unapplied that actually all current patches are applied [12:53] like we did yesterday [12:53] all applied [12:53] then you create a new patch by [12:54] quilt new PATCHNAME .... use ftbfs_toolkit_xre_Makefile_in [12:54] as PATCHNAME [12:54] end with .patch or no need to end with anything? [12:56] no ... we usually don't use .patch in the end [12:56] k [12:56] or can you see .patch in any applied? [12:56] its now on top [12:56] just one [12:56] yeah [12:56] right [12:56] ok [12:56] now quilt is not like bzr [12:57] it doesn't know anything about the state [12:57] so you have to tell quilt that it should observe the file you are going to touch [12:57] in order to do that you have to [12:57] quilt add path/to/file/you/want/to/Edit [12:57] in our case its toolkit/xre/Makefile.in , right? [12:57] /toolkit/xre [12:58] ah yes makefile [12:58] thats a good question but yes i think it is makefile.in [12:58] im looking at failure [12:59] look at bonsai [12:59] its definitly toolkit/xre/Makefile.in [12:59] ah yes [12:59] because it failed in toolkit/xre [12:59] right [12:59] so add that file to be tracked in that patch [12:59] like above [12:59] then go into that file and fix the install:: target [12:59] File toolkit/xre/Makefile.in added to patch ftbfs_toolkit_xre_Makefile_in [12:59] (look how the libs:: line looks [01:00] yeah [01:00] where is the patch at this point? [01:00] its been created in debian/patches/ [01:00] but you don't need to care [01:01] its not there [01:03] it might even be not yet created (until first content is added) [01:03] ah ok [01:03] it gets created lazily [01:03] so edit makefile.in ... and look at your changes by [01:03] quilt diff [01:03] k let me see what we have [01:03] http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsview2.cgi?diff_mode=context&whitespace_mode=show&root=/cvsroot&subdir=mozilla/toolkit/xre&command=DIFF_FRAMESET&root=/cvsroot&file=Makefile.in&rev1=1.79&rev2=1.80 [01:03] that page (shows diff) [01:03] yeah [01:03] they added new targets for platform.ini [01:03] but failed to do it right for install:: target [01:03] because nobody upstream uses make install [01:03] so we ran into this [01:04] look how the libs:: line looks like [01:04] the install:: line should be similar [01:04] just fix that and show me quilt diff [01:05] oh so just use whats on the right hand side [01:05] yeah [01:05] they forgot [01:05] because they never use install [01:05] its always the same [01:05] install is always broken if they add something [01:05] either it forgets something ... or it has a typo [01:07] i have to find right makefile :( [01:07] hey ... its the one you just added to patch [01:07] remember? [01:08] gnomefreak: you should learn to use vi at some point [01:08] gedit will bring you to a mental institution at some point [01:08] anyway ... not today ;) [01:10] gnomefreak: you said: [01:10] 12:59 < gnomefreak> File toolkit/xre/Makefile.in added to patch ftbfs_toolkit_xre_Makefile_in [01:10] if that helps ;) [01:10] yeah i know but it looks exactly the same [01:11] same like what? [01:11] i guess its not hte green part i need to be looking for [01:12] the green part is what was added [01:12] so naturally its the same [01:12] the libs:: lines are the same but the makefile is missing the section above [01:12] but the green part has a fault [01:12] just fix the install:: line [01:12] but look closer if you want to understand [01:12] take your time [01:13] gnomefreak: maybe you got this wrong ... the patch you see in bonsai is the patch that broke this thing [01:13] it looks like the makefile.in has different indentions but that shouldnt matter [01:13] (its not the cure) [01:13] oh [01:13] we are developing the cure right now [01:13] and will submit upstream [01:13] ah ok [01:13] what should i be comparing it to? [01:14] you should not compare against anything [01:14] you have to fix the install:: line [01:14] and then produce a patch by quilt refresh [01:14] ah ok [01:14] but you can take alook [01:14] and show me your changes [01:14] before refresh [01:14] with quilt diff [01:14] just run quilt diff after you fixed the makefile [01:14] and show :) [01:14] so i can confirm that you did right ;) [01:15] though the change is pretty trivial [01:17] it is? [01:17] im lookingt at error i got from build atm [01:17] its just a one line change [01:17] gnomefreak: you see that the nsinstall run is missing an argument [01:17] if you look to makefile you see that $^ is empty [01:17] do you see that [01:17] ? [01:17] install:: [01:17] $(INSTALL) $(IFLAGS1) $^ $(DESTDIR)$(mozappdir) [01:17] $^ will be replaced with whatever is after instal:: [01:17] i have that in makefile [01:17] and since there is nothing ... this will be replaced by empty [01:17] so the error you see during build will happen [01:17] (e.g. wrong arguments to nsinstall) [01:17] k [01:17] you understand? [01:17] just assume: [01:17] there would be [01:17] install:: [01:17] ^ == nothing [01:17] cp $^ /tmp/ [01:17] when make is run [01:17] it will be just cp /tmp [01:18] so it would fail [01:18] k [01:18] same goes for $(INSTALL) .... [01:18] so fix the install:: line will cure you [01:18] like it is for libs:: [01:18] a few lined above [01:18] $^ $(DIST)/bin [01:19] no [01:19] just fix the install:: line [01:19] is the line for libs:: [01:19] no [01:19] the line for libs:: [01:19] is [01:19] i no im not changing that line [01:19] [01:19] libs:: platform.ini [01:19] while install:: is just [01:19] install:: [01:19] ah [01:19] you look at the line below libs:: :) [01:19] yes [01:20] so fix the install:: line ;) [01:20] install:: should have something after it [01:20] yeah [01:20] the same [01:20] install should install platforms.ini [01:20] oh [01:21] i couldnt find that in error from build :( [01:21] yeah ... just look again ... $^ is empty ... which causes a command line error in build [01:21] so of course you cannot see it ;) [01:21] anyway ... now fix it :) [01:21] and show me quilt diff :) [01:22] libs:: platform.ini [01:22] install:: platform.ini [01:22] http://pastebin.mozilla.org/114512 [01:22] good [01:22] now the standard refresh we use: [01:22] quilt refresh --diffstat -U8 [01:23] it was refreshed [01:23] yeah then you are done ... add the new patch to bzr and commit series and the new patch [01:23] e.g. bzr add debian/patches/howver_the_new_patch_is_called [01:23] bzr commit debian/patches/series debian/patches/howver_the_new_patch_is_called [01:24] ok so i can get out of buil-tree now [01:24] yeah [01:24] k [01:24] bzr status should show you one unknown file (the new patch) [01:24] and modified series [01:24] can you confirm that? [01:24] if so you need to add the unknown file and commit [01:25] use bzr add debian/patches/however_new_patch_is_called to add [01:25] before commit [01:26] ok its added [01:26] now just commit [01:26] yeah [01:27] afterwards you should not see it as unknown file with bzr status anymore, right? [01:28] give me a minute :) [01:28] sure [01:31] it shows a bunch of unknown files [01:31] but not that patch [01:34] so you committed the patch? [01:34] what revision is latest? [01:34] bzr log | more [01:34] 24 [01:34] ok show me a bzr diff -r 23..24 [01:35] 23 is commited and 24 is commited [01:35] http://pastebin.mozilla.org/114513 [01:35] brb more coffee [01:36] looks good [01:36] please try to build now [01:41] im thinking of pulling them both and commiting the whole patches dir. since i removed those 2 patches [01:41] and ill do it all as one commit with rules and changelog (rules i have to check on first [01:44] he? [01:44] please rephrase [01:45] i don't understand what you want to do [01:45] please test if build works now first [01:45] and bring up the patch somewhere so i can submit upstream ;) [01:46] i changed rules to not use png so needs to be commited changelog as well and patches dir. since i added 1 patch modified series and antoher patch [01:47] patch you can wget http://gnomefreak.youmortals.com/ftbfs_toolkit_xre_Makefile_in [01:48] gnomefreak: please do a distinct commmit [01:48] for the series and ftbfs [01:48] otherwise merging that to granparadiso branch becomes a crux [01:48] so dont do them all together [01:48] oh ok [01:48] always commit changelog in its own commit [01:48] at the end [01:48] because that will always cause conflicts [01:48] if you merge it somewhere [01:48] no ... commit per issue [01:48] commit for the ftbfs [01:49] then commit if you want to do cleanup (like removing patches) [01:49] then commit changelog documenting all this [01:49] gnomefreak: please verify first that the build succeeds now [01:49] i want to be sure before submitting (though its a safe bet) [01:50] k [01:54] why is trunk depending on quilt and cdbs arnt they both for patching? [01:57] no [01:57] cdbs is build system [01:57] quilt is a patchsystem [01:57] cdbs allows you to use multiple patch systems [01:58] e.g. quilt, dpatch, simple-patchsys [01:58] ah ok [01:58] we use quilt as its most sophisticated and we can use it without cdbs-edit-patch (e.g. which does the same stupid thing as dpatch-edit-patch) [01:59] ah [02:00] when you get time (its not important) take a look at https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam and let me know if i am missing packages in the list [02:02] firefox-granparadiso [02:02] don't know what install-flash-player is [02:02] maybe drop it from that list [02:02] unless you know that its still valid [02:08] ok ill look into it [02:09] feisty was last time it was uploaded [02:10] its not in feisty hmmmm [02:14] only flash packages now is gnash and flashplugin-nonfree as none of the others showed up in feisty or gutsy [02:19] asac: for granparadiso did you forget to add name and email time and date to changelog? [02:19] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+source/firefox-granparadiso/+changelog [02:23] no its just how its displayed in launchpad [02:23] i explicitily included both changelog entries in changes [02:24] ah ok [02:24] now our homepage should be up to date === DarkSun88 [n=Ma@ubuntu/member/darksun88] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [02:32] Hi all [02:32] I'm off now. [02:32] Sya === gnomefreak gonna take a break since it is a holiday ;) but it shouldnt be too long as holiday or not i want trunk done [02:51] DarkSun88: hey ... cya === jeromeg [n=jerome@gra94-2-82-66-142-60.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [03:09] DarkSun88: pushed [03:13] asac: Thanks for upload. [03:13] :) [03:14] Change I the status of bug as "Fix Committed"? [03:24] DarkSun88: sorry no idea :) ... i am not the man to ask about exact motu procedures [03:24] :D [03:24] Ok, sorry. [03:24] :) [03:24] my bet would be that its released as soon as builds have finished ... but no idea [03:25] maybe ask on -motu and let me know :) [03:28] Usually, the MOTU changes the status of bug as Fix Committed after to have uploaded the package. [03:28] So, change the status. :) [03:28] so i shall change it? [03:28] ah [03:28] so the sponsor changes it? [03:28] ok [03:28] Yes. [03:29] done [03:29] Thanks :) [03:29] Are you the sponsor of bluekuja, right? [03:30] yes his mentor [03:30] actually i don't like sponsoring ;) [03:30] unless its mozilla related of course [03:31] :) [03:31] I've read the Andrea's MOTU Application in this days. [03:31] s/read/readed [03:32] read is right i guess :) [03:32] read read read :) [03:32] read red red [03:32] (pronounced) [03:32] though i might be wrong === DarkMageZ [n=richard@238.101.233.220.exetel.com.au] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [03:34] no it's ok :) [03:34] :) === DarkMageZ [n=richard@238.101.233.220.exetel.com.au] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === jeromeg [n=jerome@gra94-2-82-66-142-60.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [04:16] gnomefreak: did build go well === bluekuja [n=andrea@ubuntu/member/bluekuja] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === shirish [n=shirish@59.95.6.121] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [05:29] asac: what is that ubufox , can you tell me something about it? [05:30] its a package where ubuntu specific tweaks will go [05:30] e.g. for now it ships all preference changes we have [05:30] later report a bug menu entry et al will go there [05:31] the efford is to bring our firefox closer to upstream [05:31] so we only carry patches that are prefetched bugfixes from bugzilla [05:31] package ... aka an extension [05:31] shirish: ^^ [05:31] asac: ok but this is just good for firefox or also for firefox-granparadiso? [05:32] currently only for firefox [05:32] maybe i will develop ubufox for firefox 3 ... which could be installed in-granparadiso then [05:32] but not yet in pipeline [05:33] asac: one thing though, the description is kinda off for this, maybe you could set it right [05:33] Description: modifications for ubuntu firefox (default) install [05:33] Extension package for firefox, that ships various modifications for the ubuntu default install of firefox. [05:33] [05:33] You can uninstall this package if you prefer to use a genuine firefox install. [05:34] asac: see you buddy, will be bbl === shirish [n=shirish@59.95.6.121] has left #ubuntu-mozillateam [] [05:37] DarkSun88: thanks [05:38] asac: ;) [05:39] asac: Your version is *ubuntu2, right? [05:43] for xulrunner? [05:43] probably [05:43] yes [05:43] did it fail or what? [05:43] asac: Ok. [05:44] No no. [05:45] asac: Currently building again [05:46] good ... ;) [05:46] for a secod i felt this pain ... you know ;) [05:46] :D [05:58] asac: On i386 it's ok. [05:59] Waiting for others arch. === hjmf [n=hjmf@150.Red-83-44-175.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [05:59] asac: howdy, just stepping in! [05:59] bug 124016 [05:59] Launchpad bug 124016 in sun-java5 "added Xb-Npp-xxx tags accordingly to "firefox distro add-on suport" spec" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/124016 [05:59] probably tonight when I'll be back I'll do sun-java6-plugin [05:59] if not then tomorrow morning === hjmf will be back at night (hopes) [06:04] hjmf_: great ... thanks [06:04] probably upload tonight ... everything else went in already [06:31] DarkSun88: two architectures failed? [06:31] asac: No, three successfully built. :) [06:31] ah ;) [06:34] gnomefreak: build succeeded? [06:41] asac: Last architecture. [06:42] (i64) [06:42] ia* === JenFraggle [n=jen@host86-134-24-44.range86-134.btcentralplus.com] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [07:05] gone for a few hours [07:41] asac: yep it did [08:08] asac: are you updating granparadiso or did they not release a tarball for it === hjmf [n=hjmf@150.Red-83-44-175.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === hjmf [n=hjmf@150.Red-83-44-175.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [09:05] asac: sun-java6-plugin: bug 124059 [09:05] Launchpad bug 124059 in sun-java6 "added Xb-Npp-xxx tags accordingly to "firefox distro add-on suport" spec" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/124059 === shirish [n=shirish@59.95.10.162] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [09:13] guys anybody here has firefox-granparadiso? [09:15] shirish: what ubuntu and what is the question [09:16] gnomefreak: I'm on FF3 alpha 5 & there is no option to save page as a pdf [09:16] gnomefreak: wired tells me that this was introduced in FF3 alpha 3 [09:16] http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/2007/04/firefox_3_alpha.html [09:16] do you have a link for pdf [09:16] gnomefreak: look up :) [09:17] shirish: wired isnt working on it and you didnt give me link to the pdf [09:17] gnomefreak: right, wired isn't working on it, would investigate & report further. They reported it hence thought its there. [09:18] shirish: your missing point. not everything happens when it is first said to happen. can i have a link to the pdf please [09:19] gnomefreak: I think I must have jumped the gun, there is no link to the pdf atm, I'm trying to find out === gnomefreak goes back to work === shirish goes back to investigating & finding more about FF3 [09:23] shirish: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/3.0a3/releasenotes/ doesnt say anything about it [09:24] that's what I got, dunno from where the wired guys got that added. [09:24] neither does a1 or a2 [09:25] if you dont hear it from a source that would know be very carefull what you believe, im not saying its not there but its a good chance that it was postponed [09:27] gnomefreak: got it, although it would be cool to have that [09:30] yeah and its proibly in the windows or mac versions [09:32] gnomefreak: will check out l8ter & let u know if its there, as they have moved on alpha 7 [09:38] gnomefreak: another thing, .xpi are not associated with either firefox or firefox-granparadiso, shouldn't they be or are there other apps. (besides archives which can use .xpi) [09:39] besides archive managers like Xarchiver & like [09:39] .xpi are different source [09:40] they are not built with firefox (except for lang packs [09:43] right, what I was thinking is its just an extension, just like .odt for openoffice.org, so shouldn't they be associated with each other, or is this something that should be done upstream? [09:44] is firefox the only ones that use .xpi? [09:45] .odt == open office doc .exe == windows archive(for most part) [09:47] shirish: btw afaik both of these are wrong: # Boomarks are now called Places, new menu structure [09:47] # Save web pages as PDF [09:47] atleast on linux [09:48] gnomefreak: wikipedia talks of all mozilla browsers, but 4 other apps. which I don't think have nothing to do with browsers, seems to be similar to the .exe you were stating. [09:49] gnomefreak: you are right, bookmarks is known as places & they got that one wrong also, save pages on pdf (isn't even in the alpha 6 release notes also). [09:49] and if you look at link they gave you to release notes none of those are stated [09:49] and they are behind [09:50] im uploading alpha 6 atm they are still on 4 [09:50] :) [09:50] wow, you are doing this on ubuntu straight alpha 6 or on debian also [09:51] just feisty atm [09:51] I am sure you noticed the wishlist bug I had put yesterday about alpha 6 [09:51] debian can get thier own [09:51] ah ok, feisty, on gutsy :( [09:51] shirish: nope [09:51] maybe [09:51] :) [09:51] i saw alot of bugs yesterday [09:51] I'm sure [09:52] 40+ bugs yesterday iirc [09:53] wow, that's a big big triage [09:53] no not really [09:53] hjm^f does alot more [09:53] alot maybe like 100+ a day [09:54] when he does them [09:54] wow, that's quite a lot of bugs [09:54] when firefox has 500+ bugs you have to [09:55] asac: i finally got my first bug on iceape (that i didnt file) and its a damn crash if i had to guess without seeing the debugging info its cario [10:02] i guess i can replace old tarball with new one [10:08] gnomefreak: enjoy yourself, will be looking forward to alpha 6 whenever its ready to hit gutsy :) [10:08] cheers === shirish [n=shirish@59.95.10.162] has left #ubuntu-mozillateam [] [10:23] when is sprint week? [10:26] alphs6 in feisty preview archives [10:38] gnomefreak: does trunk build? [10:38] gnomefreak: does it crash for you? [10:39] or display wierd stuff on shutdown on console? [10:39] so far it built i havent gotten crash in feisty yet [10:39] give me a few minutes to finish email and ill run through a series of tests [10:39] hjmf: i dropped a comment on your java5 debdiff [10:40] wtf is wrong with people [10:40] hjmf: in your java6 diff it locks good though [10:40] asac: ok looking [10:40] ok i am out ... have to arrive really before i can seriously do anything [10:40] 30 minutes i guess [10:40] asac: someone replied to your answer on the ML [10:41] we dont work fast enough is how i read it [10:41] asac: bug 123687 is the same problem than bug 117575 [10:41] Launchpad bug 123687 in firefox-granparadiso "/usr/lib/firefox-granparadiso/firefox doesnt run" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/123687 [10:41] Launchpad bug 117575 in firefox "[GUTSY] Cannot execute /usr/lib/firefox/x-www-browser-bin." [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/117575 [10:42] why is bug #1 in our bugs :( [10:42] Launchpad bug 1 in Ubuntu "Microsoft has a majority market share" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1 [10:43] son of a bitch [10:43] yeah gnomefreak :) [10:43] asac: this isnt good! and i think it might have been granparadiso in gutsy i tested :( [10:43] (Feisty)gnomefreak@GutsyGibbon:~$ firefox-trunk [10:43] Couldn't read application.ini [10:43] the patch seems to not have worked === asac_ [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [10:51] no patch maybe ok since i didnt add applications.ini to it [10:58] asac: gnomefreak, I'm not sure if it is the same problem, I think I'm too tired to be productive at this hour, I'll look at it tomorrow evening [10:58] cu [10:59] anyway in my chroot it doesnt launch crash or anything else except couldnt read applications.ini [11:00] asac: did you try granparadiso yet? [11:00] sorry had a call [11:00] its k [11:00] ok [11:01] whats the problem? [11:01] but let me get something to eat first [11:01] ok ill be in a nd out [11:01] i built granparadiso a6 ... [11:01] however its somehow instable [11:01] and? [11:01] which i refer to cairo [11:01] when i shutdown i get crash [11:01] 100% reproducible [11:02] its an assertion crash [11:02] cant be any worse than getting Couldn't read application.ini on start up [11:02] do you see it in console on trunk? [11:02] hmm application.ini [11:02] gnomefreak do you steill have built directory? [11:02] i get that error and it brings me back to prompt [11:02] yes [11:02] its probably just not installed [11:02] go to debian/firefox& [11:02] debian/firefox/ [11:02] directory [11:02] inside it try to find that file [11:03] is it there? [11:03] somewhere beneath [11:03] do a deep search [11:03] in console like find | grep application.*ini [11:03] debian/firefox-trunk? [11:03] yeah [11:03] sorry forgot that you are using trunk ;) [11:04] no [11:04] find | grep application.*ini just gives me prompt [11:05] hm [11:05] ko [11:05] and if you do that find in build-tree ? [11:05] might give you garbage [11:05] please just look careful if there is any application.ini in between [11:07] they seem to be in build-tree/mozilla [11:07] there are 4 or so [11:07] ./browser/app/application.ini seems likely to be the one? [11:07] probably [11:07] whatothers? [11:07] do exist? [11:08] ./extensions/python/dom/test/pyxultest/application.ini [11:08] ./extensions/layout-debug/application.ini [11:08] ./dist/bin/application.ini [11:08] ./browser/app/application.ini [11:08] yeah [11:08] stupid mob [11:08] you see ... its exactly like with our build failure [11:08] they give a damn shit about standard way of doing linux build [11:08] they just forget to add that file to install:: target [11:09] as they just don't remember that there is somebody out there who runs make install [11:09] ok [11:09] lets look [11:09] it should be missing in browser/app/Makefile.in [11:09] they are all there [11:09] he? [11:09] all the application.ini are there [11:09] yes ... but not installed, right? [11:10] how would i find out if installed? [11:10] they werent in debian/ [11:11] yeah then they are not installed [11:11] it looks complicated [11:11] e.g. they just have in that makefile [11:11] DIST_FILES = application.ini [11:11] which means they have some generic make rule coded for that variable [11:12] probably in config/rules.mk [11:12] (which is where most of their generic make system code lies) [11:13] i dont see a config/rules.mk [11:13] yeah they just coded it and ignored install target [11:13] its in mozilla/config/rules.mk [11:13] http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/config/rules.mk [11:13] thats the file [11:14] search for dist_files [11:14] and you see that they just have a libs:: target for it [11:14] nothing about install:: [11:14] gnomefreak: do you have orig.tarball somwhere? [11:14] of what you try to build? [11:14] and pushed your changes to mt branch or so? [11:14] yes the one made with build [11:15] asac: already done [11:15] good ... where can i get the orig? [11:15] is it on your server? [11:15] yep [11:15] i have to do a patch for that ... again [11:15] give me a sec ill get link [11:15] do you have url at hand? [11:15] cool [11:16] http://gnomefreak.youmortals.com/mozilla-testing/dists/feisty/main/source/firefox-trunk_2.99+2cvs20070703.orig.tar.gz [11:16] gratias [11:17] and bzr branch url? [11:17] getting [11:17] sftp of mozilla branch or something [11:17] though i should be able to figure out [11:17] how is the branch called? [11:17] trunk? [11:17] do you want sftp or http [11:17] just tell me the name [11:17] the rest i can see on my own [11:18] trunk i think [11:18] im frozen [11:18] cant do anything but type here [11:18] brb === gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [11:28] there you are :) [11:29] brb strange dog [11:29] n-m is borked [11:30] nm is my realm :( [11:30] i don't feel good about it [11:31] tomorrow i have to wlan router + usb dongle ... and pray that this works [11:31] in my lunchtime :( [11:31] and i need a power adapter for uk [11:33] gnomefreak: did you push to mt branch? [11:33] its not connecting i have to disconnect and reconnect it :( ok whats up with firefox-trunk [11:33] yes [11:33] i hope so [11:33] bzr push sftp://gnomefreak@bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/trunk [11:34] yep i did [11:34] looked with arrow ;) [11:34] ok [11:34] i got it [11:34] lets see [11:34] k [11:34] this might take some time ;) [11:35] take your time [11:35] when did you adopt n-m? [11:35] as was voluntold [11:36] i was [11:36] lol [11:36] sorry to hear that [11:36] actually if i don't have enough time i can push it away [11:36] but i like the challange === gnomefreak wants to know how your gonna fix this issue with it [11:36] actually i am more a high level programmer and always hated things that have remotely todo with hardware [11:36] me too :-D === gnomefreak here if needed [11:38] quilt new config_rules_install_dist_files [11:38] Patch config_rules_install_dist_files is now on top [11:38] quilt add config/rules.mk [11:38] File config/rules.mk added to patch config_rules_install_dist_files [11:38] ok ... now lets fix rules.mk ;) [11:38] 2 patches? [11:38] oh and next time you might want to type that in terminal [11:39] hmmmmm [11:39] places menu changed i think [11:39] starting to look alot like windows :( [11:40] in fox? [11:40] no in gnome menu [11:41] what is windowish now? [11:41] places>Documents and places>bookmarks [11:46] asac: problem [11:46] i saw this in -devel and i didnt even know we had a middle click patch [11:47] asac: bug 124084 [11:47] Launchpad bug 124084 in firefox "patch dropped: disable middle-click paste" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/124084 [11:49] ok lets see whats worth this patch [11:50] im looking into lost patch maybe we took it out for a reason [11:53] gnomefreak: rejected [11:53] its now in ubufox [11:53] as almost every preference tweak [11:53] i commented accordingly [11:53] asac: i dont think hes gonna like that [11:53] doesn't matter [11:54] its just the smarter way [11:54] i agree [11:54] grabbing firefox now so i can merge to mozillateam branch [11:55] k [11:55] gnomefreak: if he complains ... let me know [11:55] i have a huge bugmail backlog atm [11:55] k [11:55] because i worked too much on other things [11:55] time is getting short of getting all my specs implemented [11:56] and the mobile browser eats time too [11:56] i want almost all of my specs be done by end of july [11:57] so i can concetrate on stabilizing and bug fixing till gutsy is out [11:57] gnomefreak: if there is something serious popping up ... like firefox doesn't run for a bunch of users anymore, please raise [11:58] otherwise it might go unseen for too long [11:58] same for thunderbird ... my picture of thunderbird state is atm a bit too blurry imo [11:59] gnomefreak: http://people.ubuntu.com/~asac/config_rules_install_dist_files [11:59] thats the path [11:59] its not verified if it fixes it [11:59] but i think so [11:59] build still going [11:59] if you want to prefetch it go ahead [12:00] and tell me if you want to push this to mt branch or if i should push it [12:00] just add to series at the end [12:01] gnomefreak: now its good ... i uploaded a bogus version [12:01] first [12:02] you can pull if you want or wait till i confirmed that it works [12:02] pull == prefetch the patch from my p.u.c account [12:08] ok [12:08] ill grab it throw it in and wait [12:10] once you confirm ill build and make sure it works on feisty build (im assuming your doing gutsy) and ill push it [12:11] i can use the practice with bzr [12:14] sure [12:14] its your branch [12:17] gnomefreak: ok ... you have to add application.ini to firefox-trunk.install [12:18] same goes for platform.ini ? [12:18] otherwise the patch looks good [12:18] if you want i can do the firefox-trunk.install modification [12:18] but maybe just try [12:18] ok i have to add it [12:18] its /usr/lib/firefox/application.ini [12:18] and probably platform.ini in same directory [12:19] just verify after build if both files are installed in debian/firefox-trunk/usr/lib/firefox/ [12:20] i dont see application.ini in debian/firefox-trunk/usr/lib/firefox-trunk [12:21] gnomefreak: look in the patch [12:21] gnomefreak: it will not be there until you applied patch and build [12:21] the patch is to install it there ;) [12:22] actually it will end up in debian/tmp/usr/lib/firefox-trunk by make install [12:22] you have to add that file to firefox-trunk.install to get it installed in package target directory [12:22] -- which is debian/firefox-trunk/usr/lib/firefox-trunk [12:22] like i just said :) [12:22] gnomefreak: look in the patch ... there is a typo in it [12:23] in the config/rules.mk patch? [12:23] in documentation (in the top) DEST_FILES --> should be DIST_FILES [12:23] yes its just a documentation typo [12:23] look in [12:23] you will see [12:23] yes i see it [12:24] in the comments under --evaluation [12:26] ok so in debian/firefox-trunk.install i add application.ini and platform.ini right? [12:27] debian/firefox-trunk/usr/lib/firefox-trunk/application.ini [12:27] like that? [12:27] gnomefreak: ok ... please add another documentation line to the patch ... right on top: [12:27] k [12:27] This is from: [12:27] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386904 [12:27] Mozilla bug 386904 in Build Config "DIST_FILES and DIST_CHROME_FILES not implemented for install:: target in config/rules.mk" [Normal,New] [12:28] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=270967 [12:28] ^^ those three lines ... then add two new-lines before text begins [12:28] thanks [12:28] above --summary