[12:28] <asac> can you paste the original patch as well please ?
[12:28] <asac> e.g. the one that is still in debian/patches ?
[12:28] <gnomefreak> yes
[12:28] <asac> gnomefreak: you sure you saved?
[12:28] <asac> I don't see any PROGRAM lines in that diff
[12:28] <gnomefreak> http://pastebin.mozilla.org/114364
[12:29] <gnomefreak> asac: yes i was looking at that too let me see
[12:29] <asac> you didn't save
[12:30] <asac> as you can see the diff for mozilla.orig/browser/app/Makefile.in is now completely missing in your new quilt diff
[12:30] <gnomefreak> http://pastebin.mozilla.org/114367
[12:30] <asac> please do the change
[12:30] <gnomefreak> still missing and yes i saved
[12:30] <gnomefreak> i did already
[12:30] <asac> look into that file again
[12:30] <asac> (open in new editor)
[12:31] <gnomefreak> ifeq ($(USE_SHORT_LIBNAME), 1)
[12:31] <gnomefreak> PROGRAM = $(MOZ_APP_NAME)-trunk$(BIN_SUFFIX)
[12:31] <gnomefreak> else
[12:31] <gnomefreak> PROGRAM = $(MOZ_APP_NAME)-trunk-bin$(BIN_SUFFIX)
[12:31] <gnomefreak> endif
[12:32] <asac> you sure you are in right directory tree?
[12:32] <gnomefreak> yes i opened it up new and save never saved it
[12:32] <asac> ah
[12:32] <asac> please save it  :)
[12:32] <asac> when your change shows up in quilt diff ... let me know :)
[12:33] <gnomefreak> http://pastebin.mozilla.org/114369
[12:33] <asac> yeah ... that looks better
[12:33] <gnomefreak> i did save it the whole time :(
[12:33] <asac> ok ... updating patch is now really simple ;)
[12:33] <asac> just do
[12:33] <asac> quilt refresh --diffstat -U8
[12:34] <gnomefreak> in mozilla dir still i take it
[12:34] <gnomefreak> ok refreshed
[12:34] <asac> do it whereever you ran quilt diff
[12:34] <asac> ok ... now you can stay in that directory and see if all other patches apply as well
[12:34] <asac> (e.g. lets excercise quilt a bit)
[12:34] <gnomefreak> k
[12:34] <asac> run quilt top
[12:35] <asac> it should show you the currently top-most patch applied
[12:35] <asac> (which should be trunk-fsh)
[12:35] <gnomefreak> trunk-fsh
[12:35] <asac> you see that?
[12:35] <asac> yeah
[12:35] <asac> run quilt series
[12:35] <asac> what do you see?
[12:35] <gnomefreak> 3 of them
[12:35] <asac> the whole series, right?
[12:35] <gnomefreak> no-have-stdint-h-ftbfs.patch
[12:35] <gnomefreak> trunk-fsh
[12:35] <gnomefreak> ftbfs-with-branding-dir
[12:35] <gnomefreak> yes
[12:36] <asac> that should be all patches listed in series
[12:36] <asac> you can do quilt applied
[12:36] <asac> to see which ones are currently applied
[12:36] <gnomefreak> although there are 5 or so in debian/patches so i may get rid of the non used patches
[12:36] <asac> yeah ... might be that i removed them from series weithout removing the in patches
[12:36] <gnomefreak> no-have-stdint-h-ftbfs.patch
[12:36] <gnomefreak> trunk-fsh
[12:36] <asac> yeah ... and unapplied?
[12:36] <gnomefreak> missing one
[12:36] <asac>  -> quilt unapplied
[12:37] <gnomefreak> ftbfs-with-branding-dir
[12:37] <asac> which is what we expected, right?
[12:37] <gnomefreak> why did we expect that one to not be applied
[12:37] <asac> because the trunk-fsh failed
[12:37] <gnomefreak> other than the other 2 were wuilt applied
[12:37] <gnomefreak> ah ok
[12:37] <asac> we now applied it manually
[12:38] <asac> and now we can apply the last one with
[12:38] <asac> quilt push
[12:38] <asac> try that
[12:38] <asac> does it fail?
[12:38] <gnomefreak> its patched
[12:38] <asac> cool
[12:38] <asac> ok ... don't go out
[12:38] <asac> just get a feeling for what quilt does
[12:38] <asac> try quilt pop
[12:38] <asac> then look at unapplied and applied again
[12:38] <asac> then do another pop
[12:38] <gnomefreak> hey
[12:39] <gnomefreak> pop redoes the last thing you did ?
[12:39] <gnomefreak> or just last patch applied
[12:39] <asac> pop unapplies what is currently on top
[12:39] <gnomefreak> ah ok
[12:39] <asac> with pop you unapply ... with push you apply
[12:39] <asac> you can pop all by
[12:39] <asac> quilt pop -a
[12:39] <asac> then all patches should be in unapplied
[12:40] <asac> and applied should be none
[12:40] <asac> do you see?
[12:40] <asac> then you can apply all again by quilt push -a
[12:40] <asac>  :)
[12:40] <gnomefreak> yes
[12:40] <asac> after that all should be in applied
[12:40] <asac> and non in unapplied
[12:40] <asac> ok ...fine
[12:40] <asac> the trunk-fsh patch is not fixed and applies cleanly
[12:41] <asac> just ensure that you copy it to the debian/patches directory of bzr tree
[12:41] <asac> (so you don't loose it)
[12:41] <gnomefreak> not fixed because we need to add quilt diff inplace of whats there?
[12:41] <asac> no
[12:41] <gnomefreak> oh
[12:41] <asac> you did quilt refresh
[12:41] <asac> that updated the patch for you
[12:41] <asac> its already fine
[12:41] <gnomefreak> cool
[12:41] <asac> otherwise you would not be able to pop
[12:41] <asac> or push it
[12:41] <gnomefreak> makes sense
[12:42] <asac> cool :)
[12:42] <asac> well done
[12:42] <asac> you merged the patch ;)
[12:42] <gnomefreak> :) sweet ty
[12:42] <gnomefreak> now lets see if it works
[12:42] <asac> yeah (but please remember that bzr bd wipes your build-area)
[12:42] <asac> so copy the new trunk-fsh patch there
[12:42] <gnomefreak> im using dpkg-buildpackage
[12:42] <asac> you can of course just build in build-area
[12:42] <asac> right
[12:43] <asac> (but don't forget to copy it)
[12:43] <asac> :)
[12:43] <gnomefreak> copy it
[12:43] <asac> to bzr tree ... so its preserved
[12:43] <asac> (unless you are in bzr of course) :)
[12:43] <asac> i don't know how you build ... and i don't really care ;)
[12:43] <gnomefreak> wait you mean  the .bzr dir?
[12:43] <gnomefreak> or you mean push to branch?
[12:43] <asac> gnomefreak: commit the new patch :)
[12:44] <gnomefreak> ah yes
[12:44] <asac> do you use bzr bd or not?
[12:44] <asac> if you don't use bzr bd ... its just commit
[12:44] <asac> and publish it
[12:44] <asac> once the build went well
[12:44] <asac> (probably not before)
[12:45] <asac> gnomefreak: so basically what you did was the same what you do when you do a merge
[12:45] <asac> e.g. manually applying changes that patch is to stupid to apply
[12:48] <gnomefreak> ok lets try this again :)
[12:48] <asac> you can just use
[12:48] <asac> dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -nc
[12:48] <asac> to go on
[12:49] <asac> e.g. without unpacking and stuff like that
[12:49] <asac> is fucking mp3 player is driving me nuts
[12:50] <asac> it just refuses to get back to a sane state after you disconnnet it without pulling the plug
[12:51] <asac> who knows ... maybe it just cannot reconfigure at all
[12:51] <asac> and i have to write a server that keeps line up until the plug is physically reset
[12:54] <asac> am i still here?
[12:55] <asac> lag is hitting me again
[12:56] <gnomefreak> irc lag?
[12:57] <asac> yeah ... but apparently my connection worked well
[12:58] <asac> gnomefreak: do you have access to a windows box?
[12:58] <gnomefreak> no
[12:58] <gnomefreak> win box is all fudged up from what im hearing i told her id get to it this weekend so shes using laptop until than
[12:59] <asac> i already have lag
[12:59] <asac> i probably will not survive long
[01:00] <asac> gnomefreak: let me know when you have access to win :)
[01:00] <asac> i just need to get a spec that is only shipped in .exe
[01:00] <asac> which i cannot extract
[01:00] <asac> http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms867188.aspx
[01:00] <asac> there is the spec
[01:00] <asac> these bastards
[01:02] <asac> i hate ms so much
[01:02] <asac> these ignorant bastards
[01:02] <asac> hopefully they will suffocate from in their own ignorance
[01:02] <gnomefreak> why are you using it :)
[01:03] <asac> i don't use it
[01:04] <asac> i want to enable these shitty devices they force upon the world on linux
[01:04] <asac> almost all high-end mp3 players use MTP
[01:04] <asac> nowadays
[01:04] <asac> no usb-storage anymore
[01:04] <asac> everything that is more than a mp3-stick
[01:04] <asac> is mtp
[01:04] <gnomefreak> ah
[01:05] <gnomefreak> brb smoke now that i got this to start
[01:56] <gnomefreak> bug 123829
[01:56] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 123829 in dhcp "Latest Gutsy Upgrade does not connect to DHCP anymore." [Undecided,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/123829
[02:37] <asac> probably a network manager issue ./
[02:37] <asac> :/
[03:26] <gnomefreak> grrrrrr
[03:31] <gnomefreak> asac: can you please test bug 123882 on feisty 64bit when you get time
[03:31] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 123882 in firefox "Some web sites reload infinitely, but not on Opera" [Low,Incomplete]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/123882
[03:32] <asac> gnomefreak: not reproducible .. added comment
[03:33] <gnomefreak> ah ok ty i added one he had said more than 1 site so i wanna see the others
[03:33] <gnomefreak> asac: trunk failed to build
[03:34] <gnomefreak> i will look into it more in the morning im going to bed
[08:04] <hjmf_> asac: I've submitted bug 123926
[08:04] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 123926 in totem "added Xb-Npp-xxx tags accordingly to "firefox distro add-on suport" spec" [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/123926
[08:04] <hjmf_> cu
[10:54] <asac> hjmf_: great
[10:54] <asac> i just want to verify that plugin-id is the right one ... then i push it
[10:54] <asac> lets see
[10:56] <gnomefreak> asac: is there a way to crash firefox just for shits and giggles?
[11:01] <gnomefreak> this is annoying as hell
[11:04] <gnomefreak> gonna see if restarting fixes this brb
[11:16] <gnomefreak> who has ~256mb ram that i can borrow to test something?
[11:22] <gnomefreak> why is it no matter what string i search for i can never find upstream bugs maybe i need to search for somethin unrelated :(
[11:22] <asac> gnomefreak: you say its because of too little mem?
[11:22] <asac> gnomefreak: what bug do you try to triage?
[11:22] <gnomefreak> i get crash and it cant send crash report due to not enough memory
[11:23] <gnomefreak> bug 80964
[11:23] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 80964 in mozilla-thunderbird "MASTER mozilla-thunderbird crashed [@nsNSSCertificateDB::ImportCertsFromFile]  " [High,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/80964
[11:34] <gnomefreak> asac: do you remember seeing a thunderbird crash while deleting Imap message? i found upstream and i thought i remembered seeing it.
[11:37] <asac> hjmf_: all sponsored ... rock!
[11:38] <asac> hjmf_: i had to adapt changelog because uploads happened in the meantime ... though my bad
[11:39] <asac> gnomefreak: can you please verify that this crash happens with latest upstream binary release as well?
[11:39] <asac> gnomefreak: otherwise, they will probably hunt us down :)
[11:39] <gnomefreak> k
[11:39] <asac> if we post upstream
[11:40] <asac> hjmf_: would be great if you could verify tonight that the packages succeeded to build
[11:43] <gnomefreak> let me know when you have a few minutes strange feeling we are gonna need a few patches for trunk
[11:46] <asac> gnomefreak: yeah ... i always have a few minutes for you ;)
[11:46] <gnomefreak> :)
[11:46] <gnomefreak> well your not gonna like this im sure http://pastebin.mozilla.org/114392
[11:54] <asac> gnomefreak: first think you should do if things fail on trunk is to look in bonsai
[11:54] <asac> if there has been a checkin after that .... if it fails for all
[11:55] <asac> there is most likely a checkin that fixes this pretty quick
[11:55] <asac> http://bonsai.mozilla.org/
[11:55] <asac> look what was checked in last week in mozilla/toolkit/xre directory
[11:55] <asac> on HEAD
[11:55] <asac> maybe you just need to take a new snapshot
[11:55] <asac> and things will be done
[11:56] <asac> (that said: from a first glance, this looks like a bug in Makefile.in of that directory)
[12:06] <gnomefreak> hmmmm i cant open links from irssi anymore :(
[12:08] <gnomefreak> asac: do i want to look in thunderbirdtinderbox?
[12:10] <asac> why thunderbird?
[12:10] <asac> its firefox trunk that fails, right?
[12:10] <asac> gnomefreak: open the bonsai url above
[12:10] <asac> you can fill in the fields
[12:10] <asac> e.g. just set the directory like above
[12:10] <asac> ensure that Branch is HEAD (should be default)
[12:10] <gnomefreak> oh damn
[12:11] <asac> and set how far you want to look in the past (e.g. today, week, month, since beginning of time)
[12:11] <asac> usually a week should give you enough info
[12:13] <gnomefreak> it lists the same as the thunderbird search i did by mistake
[12:13] <gnomefreak> http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsquery.cgi?treeid=default&module=MozillaBranchTinderboxAll&branch=HEAD&branchtype=match&dir=mozilla%2Ftoolkit%2Fxre&file=&filetype=match&who=&whotype=match&sortby=Date&hours=2&date=week&mindate=&maxdate=&cvsroot=%2Fcvsroot
[12:18] <gnomefreak> should i diff http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/toolkit/xre/Makefile.in against the makefile.in from the source i have? oh and i dont know how to do snapshots :(
[12:19] <gnomefreak> thunder crashes upstream as well
[12:23] <asac_> sprry this sucky connection is shaky again
[12:24] <gnomefreak> i dont see anything that jumps out and smacks me in face with this FTB
[12:30] <asac_> gnomefreak: do you have build failure again?
[12:30] <asac_> i lost my irssi history
[12:30] <bluekuja> heya guys
[12:31] <asac_> bluekuja: hey
[12:31] <bluekuja> asac_: is possible to add something to previous changelog's entries?
[12:31] <bluekuja> documenting it in new one
[12:31] <asac_> bluekuja: imo yes ... but you should document that in new ... yes
[12:31] <bluekuja> asac_: I'll do that for regex
[12:32] <bluekuja> seems it's what we need
[12:32] <asac_> yes right ... fix the changelog to be more readable and add it to outstanding merges
[12:32] <bluekuja> asac_: I prepare a diff and I push it on pastebin
[12:32] <bluekuja> for you
[12:33] <asac_> of the merge changelog
[12:33] <gnomefreak> asac_: http://pastebin.mozilla.org/114392 build failure
[12:36] <asac_> if this connection resets one more time ... i will go kamikaze
[12:36] <asac_> i see lag already
[12:36] <asac_> still here?
[12:36] <asac_> ping
[12:37] <asac_> gnomefreak: ??
[12:37] <asac_> am i still here?
[12:37] <gnomefreak> yes
[12:37] <gnomefreak> did you get the failure?
[12:38] <gnomefreak> asac_: you still here or did you get dissconnected again
[12:39] <asac_> yeah i am here
[12:39] <asac_> please cross-fingers that i stay for an hour or so
[12:39] <gnomefreak> k good
[12:39] <asac_> until this mozilla bzr branch is completely scp'ed to people.ubuntu.com at lsat
[12:39] <gnomefreak> what branch is this?
[12:40] <asac_> mobile
[12:40] <gnomefreak> ah
[12:40] <asac_> a complete 350M branch
[12:40] <asac_> e.g. not just debian
[12:40] <gnomefreak> omg that is huge
[12:40] <asac_> like what i did for git ... but using bzr
[12:40] <asac_> gnomefreak: http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsquery.cgi?treeid=default&module=all&branch=HEAD&branchtype=match&dir=mozilla%2Ftoolkit%2Fxre&file=&filetype=match&who=&whotype=match&sortby=Date&hours=2&date=week&mindate=&maxdate=&cvsroot=%2Fcvsroot
[12:40] <asac_> if you look there
[12:40] <asac_> there is a change to Makefile.in
[12:41] <asac_> he?
[12:41] <asac_> its not really huge
[12:41] <asac_> anyway ... its broken
[12:41] <gnomefreak> upstream is broken?
[12:41] <asac_> yeah ... look at the libs:: line they added
[12:41] <asac_> they should have done the same for install
[12:41] <asac_> so lest do a quilt patch for that
[12:41] <asac_> you ready?
[12:41] <asac_> have tree that failed lying around?
[12:42] <gnomefreak> give me 1 minute to get set up for it
[12:43] <gnomefreak> ok do i need to be in build-tree?
[12:44] <gnomefreak> ok ready when you are :)
[12:52] <asac> ok
[12:52] <asac> you have to go to build-tree
[12:52] <asac> mozillla
[12:52] <asac> you in that directory?
[12:52] <gnomefreak> yep
[12:53] <asac> please verify with quilt applied /unapplied that actually all current patches are applied
[12:53] <asac> like we did yesterday
[12:53] <gnomefreak> all applied
[12:53] <asac> then you create a new patch by
[12:54] <asac> quilt new PATCHNAME .... use ftbfs_toolkit_xre_Makefile_in
[12:54] <asac> as PATCHNAME
[12:54] <gnomefreak> end with .patch or no need to end with anything?
[12:56] <asac> no ... we usually don't use .patch in the end
[12:56] <gnomefreak> k
[12:56] <asac> or can you see .patch in any applied?
[12:56] <gnomefreak> its now on top
[12:56] <gnomefreak> just one
[12:56] <asac> yeah
[12:56] <asac> right
[12:56] <asac> ok
[12:56] <asac> now quilt is not like bzr
[12:57] <asac> it doesn't know anything about the state
[12:57] <asac> so you have to tell quilt that it should observe the file you are going to touch
[12:57] <asac> in order to do that you have to
[12:57] <asac> quilt add path/to/file/you/want/to/Edit
[12:57] <asac> in our case its toolkit/xre/Makefile.in , right?
[12:57] <gnomefreak> /toolkit/xre
[12:58] <gnomefreak> ah yes makefile
[12:58] <gnomefreak> thats a good question but yes i think it is makefile.in
[12:58] <gnomefreak> im looking at failure
[12:59] <asac> look at bonsai
[12:59] <asac> its definitly toolkit/xre/Makefile.in
[12:59] <gnomefreak> ah yes
[12:59] <asac> because it failed in toolkit/xre
[12:59] <gnomefreak> right
[12:59] <asac> so add that file to be tracked in that patch
[12:59] <asac> like above
[12:59] <asac> then go into that file and fix the install:: target
[12:59] <gnomefreak> File toolkit/xre/Makefile.in added to patch ftbfs_toolkit_xre_Makefile_in
[12:59] <asac> (look how the libs:: line looks
[01:00] <asac> yeah
[01:00] <gnomefreak> where is the patch at this point?
[01:00] <asac> its been created in debian/patches/
[01:00] <asac> but you don't need to care
[01:01] <gnomefreak> its not there
[01:03] <asac> it might even be not yet created (until first content is added)
[01:03] <gnomefreak> ah ok
[01:03] <asac> it gets created lazily
[01:03] <asac> so edit makefile.in ... and look at your changes by
[01:03] <asac> quilt diff
[01:03] <gnomefreak> k let me see what we have
[01:03] <gnomefreak> http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsview2.cgi?diff_mode=context&whitespace_mode=show&root=/cvsroot&subdir=mozilla/toolkit/xre&command=DIFF_FRAMESET&root=/cvsroot&file=Makefile.in&rev1=1.79&rev2=1.80
[01:03] <gnomefreak> that page (shows diff)
[01:03] <asac> yeah
[01:03] <asac> they added new targets for platform.ini
[01:03] <asac> but failed to do it right for install:: target
[01:03] <asac> because nobody upstream uses make install
[01:03] <asac> so we ran into this
[01:04] <asac> look how the libs:: line looks like
[01:04] <asac> the install:: line should be similar
[01:04] <asac> just fix that and show me quilt diff
[01:05] <gnomefreak> oh so just use whats on the right hand side
[01:05] <asac> yeah
[01:05] <asac> they forgot
[01:05] <asac> because they never use install
[01:05] <asac> its always the same
[01:05] <asac> install is always broken if they add something
[01:05] <asac> either it forgets something ... or it has a typo
[01:07] <gnomefreak> i have to find right makefile :(
[01:07] <asac> hey ... its the one you just added to patch
[01:07] <asac> remember?
[01:08] <asac> gnomefreak: you should learn to use vi at some point
[01:08] <asac> gedit will bring you to a mental institution at some point
[01:08] <asac> anyway ... not today ;)
[01:10] <asac> gnomefreak: you said:
[01:10] <asac> 12:59 < gnomefreak> File toolkit/xre/Makefile.in added to patch ftbfs_toolkit_xre_Makefile_in
[01:10] <asac> if that helps ;)
[01:10] <gnomefreak> yeah i know but it looks exactly the same
[01:11] <asac> same like what?
[01:11] <gnomefreak> i guess its not hte green part i need to be looking for
[01:12] <asac> the green part is what was added
[01:12] <asac> so naturally its the same
[01:12] <gnomefreak> the libs:: lines are the same but the makefile is missing the section above
[01:12] <asac> but the green part has a fault
[01:12] <asac> just fix the install:: line
[01:12] <asac> but look closer if you want to understand
[01:12] <asac> take your time
[01:13] <asac> gnomefreak: maybe you got this wrong ... the patch you see in bonsai is the patch that broke this thing
[01:13] <gnomefreak> it looks like the makefile.in has different indentions but that shouldnt matter
[01:13] <asac> (its not the cure)
[01:13] <gnomefreak> oh
[01:13] <asac> we are developing the cure right now
[01:13] <asac> and will submit upstream
[01:13] <gnomefreak> ah ok
[01:13] <gnomefreak> what should i be comparing it to?
[01:14] <asac> you should not compare against anything
[01:14] <asac> you have to fix the install:: line
[01:14] <asac> and then produce a patch by quilt refresh
[01:14] <gnomefreak> ah ok
[01:14] <asac> but you can take alook
[01:14] <asac> and show me your changes
[01:14] <asac> before refresh
[01:14] <asac> with quilt diff
[01:14] <asac> just run quilt diff after you fixed the makefile
[01:14] <asac> and show :)
[01:14] <asac> so i can confirm that you did right ;)
[01:15] <asac> though the change is pretty trivial
[01:17] <gnomefreak> it is?
[01:17] <gnomefreak> im lookingt at error i got from build atm
[01:17] <asac> its just a one line change
[01:17] <asac> gnomefreak: you see that the nsinstall run is missing an argument
[01:17] <asac> if you look to makefile you see that $^ is empty
[01:17] <asac> do you see that
[01:17] <asac> ?
[01:17] <asac> install::
[01:17] <asac>    $(INSTALL) $(IFLAGS1) $^ $(DESTDIR)$(mozappdir)
[01:17] <asac> $^ will be replaced with whatever is after instal::
[01:17] <gnomefreak> i have that in makefile
[01:17] <asac> and since there is nothing ... this will be replaced by empty
[01:17] <asac> so the error you see during build will happen
[01:17] <asac> (e.g. wrong arguments to nsinstall)
[01:17] <gnomefreak> k
[01:17] <asac> you understand?
[01:17] <asac> just assume:
[01:17] <asac> there would be
[01:17] <asac> install::
[01:17] <gnomefreak> ^ == nothing
[01:17] <asac>     cp $^ /tmp/
[01:17] <asac> when make is run
[01:17] <asac> it will be just cp /tmp
[01:18] <asac> so it would fail
[01:18] <gnomefreak> k
[01:18] <asac> same goes for $(INSTALL) ....
[01:18] <asac> so fix the install:: line will cure you
[01:18] <asac> like it is for libs::
[01:18] <asac> a few lined above
[01:18] <gnomefreak> $^ $(DIST)/bin
[01:19] <asac> no
[01:19] <asac> just fix the install:: line
[01:19] <gnomefreak> is the line for libs::
[01:19] <asac> no
[01:19] <asac> the line for libs::
[01:19] <asac> is
[01:19] <gnomefreak> i no im not changing that line
[01:19] <asac> 
[01:19] <asac> libs:: platform.ini
[01:19] <asac> while install:: is just
[01:19] <asac> install::
[01:19] <gnomefreak> ah
[01:19] <asac> you look at the line below libs:: :)
[01:19] <gnomefreak> yes
[01:20] <asac> so fix the install:: line ;)
[01:20] <gnomefreak> install:: should have something after it
[01:20] <asac> yeah
[01:20] <asac> the same
[01:20] <asac> install should install platforms.ini
[01:20] <gnomefreak> oh
[01:21] <gnomefreak> i couldnt find that in error from build :(
[01:21] <asac> yeah ... just look again ... $^ is empty ... which causes a command line error in build
[01:21] <asac> so of course you cannot see it ;)
[01:21] <asac> anyway ... now fix it :)
[01:21] <asac> and show me quilt diff :)
[01:22] <asac> libs:: platform.ini
[01:22] <asac> install:: platform.ini
[01:22] <gnomefreak> http://pastebin.mozilla.org/114512
[01:22] <asac> good
[01:22] <asac> now the standard refresh we use:
[01:22] <asac> quilt refresh --diffstat -U8
[01:23] <gnomefreak> it was refreshed
[01:23] <asac> yeah then you are done ... add the new patch to bzr and commit series and the new patch
[01:23] <asac> e.g. bzr add debian/patches/howver_the_new_patch_is_called
[01:23] <asac> bzr commit debian/patches/series debian/patches/howver_the_new_patch_is_called
[01:24] <gnomefreak> ok so i can get out of buil-tree now
[01:24] <asac> yeah
[01:24] <gnomefreak> k
[01:24] <asac> bzr status should show you one unknown file (the new patch)
[01:24] <asac> and modified series
[01:24] <asac> can you confirm that?
[01:24] <asac> if so you need to add the unknown file and commit
[01:25] <asac> use bzr add debian/patches/however_new_patch_is_called to add
[01:25] <asac> before commit
[01:26] <gnomefreak> ok its added
[01:26] <gnomefreak> now just commit
[01:26] <asac> yeah
[01:27] <asac> afterwards you should not see it as unknown file with bzr status anymore, right?
[01:28] <gnomefreak> give me a minute :)
[01:28] <asac> sure
[01:31] <gnomefreak> it shows a bunch of unknown files
[01:31] <gnomefreak> but not that patch
[01:34] <asac> so you committed the patch?
[01:34] <asac> what revision is latest?
[01:34] <asac> bzr log | more
[01:34] <gnomefreak> 24
[01:34] <asac> ok show me a bzr diff -r 23..24
[01:35] <gnomefreak> 23 is commited and 24 is commited
[01:35] <gnomefreak> http://pastebin.mozilla.org/114513
[01:35] <gnomefreak> brb more coffee
[01:36] <asac> looks good
[01:36] <asac> please try to build now
[01:41] <gnomefreak> im thinking of pulling them both and commiting the whole patches dir. since i removed those 2 patches
[01:41] <gnomefreak> and ill do it all as one commit with rules and changelog (rules i have to check on first
[01:44] <asac> he?
[01:44] <asac> please rephrase
[01:45] <asac> i don't understand what you want to do
[01:45] <asac> please test if build works now first
[01:45] <asac> and bring up the patch somewhere so i can submit upstream ;)
[01:46] <gnomefreak> i changed rules to not use png so needs to be commited changelog as well and patches dir. since i added 1 patch modified series and antoher patch
[01:47] <gnomefreak> patch you can wget http://gnomefreak.youmortals.com/ftbfs_toolkit_xre_Makefile_in
[01:48] <asac> gnomefreak: please do a distinct commmit
[01:48] <asac> for the series and ftbfs
[01:48] <asac> otherwise merging that to granparadiso branch becomes a crux
[01:48] <gnomefreak> so dont do them all together
[01:48] <gnomefreak> oh ok
[01:48] <asac> always commit changelog in its own commit
[01:48] <asac> at the end
[01:48] <asac> because that will always cause conflicts
[01:48] <asac> if you merge it somewhere
[01:48] <asac> no ... commit per issue
[01:48] <asac> commit for the ftbfs
[01:49] <asac> then commit if you want to do cleanup (like removing patches)
[01:49] <asac> then commit changelog documenting all this
[01:49] <asac> gnomefreak: please verify first that the build succeeds now
[01:49] <asac> i want to be sure before submitting (though its a safe bet)
[01:50] <gnomefreak> k
[01:54] <gnomefreak> why is trunk depending on quilt and cdbs arnt they both for patching?
[01:57] <asac> no
[01:57] <asac> cdbs is build system
[01:57] <asac> quilt is a patchsystem
[01:57] <asac> cdbs allows you to use multiple patch systems
[01:58] <asac> e.g. quilt, dpatch, simple-patchsys
[01:58] <gnomefreak> ah ok
[01:58] <asac> we use quilt as its most sophisticated and we can use it without cdbs-edit-patch (e.g. which does the same stupid thing as dpatch-edit-patch)
[01:59] <gnomefreak> ah
[02:00] <gnomefreak> when you get time (its not important) take a look at https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam and let me know if i am missing packages in the list
[02:02] <asac> firefox-granparadiso
[02:02] <asac> don't know what install-flash-player is
[02:02] <asac> maybe drop it from that list
[02:02] <asac> unless you know that its still valid
[02:08] <gnomefreak> ok ill look into it
[02:09] <gnomefreak> feisty was last time it was uploaded
[02:10] <gnomefreak> its not in feisty hmmmm
[02:14] <gnomefreak> only flash packages now is gnash and flashplugin-nonfree as none of the others showed up in feisty or gutsy
[02:19] <gnomefreak> asac: for granparadiso did you forget to add name and email time and date to changelog?
[02:19] <gnomefreak> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+source/firefox-granparadiso/+changelog
[02:23] <asac> no its just how its displayed in launchpad
[02:23] <asac> i explicitily included both changelog entries in changes
[02:24] <gnomefreak> ah ok
[02:24] <gnomefreak> now our homepage should be up to date
[02:32] <DarkSun88> Hi all
[02:32] <DarkSun88> I'm off now.
[02:32] <DarkSun88> Sya
[02:51] <asac> DarkSun88: hey ... cya
[03:09] <asac> DarkSun88: pushed
[03:13] <DarkSun88> asac: Thanks for upload.
[03:13] <DarkSun88> :)
[03:14] <DarkSun88> Change I the status of bug as "Fix Committed"?
[03:24] <asac> DarkSun88: sorry no idea :) ... i am not the man to ask about exact motu procedures
[03:24] <DarkSun88> :D
[03:24] <DarkSun88> Ok, sorry.
[03:24] <DarkSun88> :)
[03:24] <asac> my bet would be that its released as soon as builds have finished ... but no idea
[03:25] <asac> maybe ask on -motu and let me know :)
[03:28] <DarkSun88> Usually, the MOTU changes the status of bug as Fix Committed after to have uploaded the package.
[03:28] <DarkSun88> So, change the status. :)
[03:28] <asac> so i shall change it?
[03:28] <asac> ah
[03:28] <asac> so the sponsor changes it?
[03:28] <asac> ok
[03:28] <DarkSun88> Yes.
[03:29] <asac> done
[03:29] <DarkSun88> Thanks :)
[03:29] <DarkSun88> Are you the sponsor of bluekuja, right?
[03:30] <asac> yes his mentor
[03:30] <asac> actually i don't like sponsoring ;)
[03:30] <asac> unless its mozilla related of course
[03:31] <DarkSun88> :)
[03:31] <DarkSun88> I've read the Andrea's MOTU Application in this days.
[03:31] <DarkSun88> s/read/readed
[03:32] <asac> read is right i guess :)
[03:32] <asac> read read read :)
[03:32] <asac> read red red
[03:32] <asac> (pronounced)
[03:32] <asac> though i might be wrong
[03:34] <jeromeg> no it's ok :)
[03:34] <DarkSun88> :)
[04:16] <asac> gnomefreak: did build go well
[05:29] <shirish> asac: what is that ubufox , can you tell me something about it?
[05:30] <asac> its a package where ubuntu specific tweaks will go
[05:30] <asac> e.g. for now it ships all preference changes we have
[05:30] <asac> later report a bug menu entry et al will go there
[05:31] <asac> the efford is to bring our firefox closer to upstream
[05:31] <asac> so we only carry patches that are prefetched bugfixes from bugzilla
[05:31] <asac> package ... aka an extension
[05:31] <asac> shirish: ^^
[05:31] <shirish> asac: ok but this is just good for firefox or also for firefox-granparadiso?
[05:32] <asac> currently only for firefox
[05:32] <asac> maybe i will develop ubufox for firefox 3 ... which could be installed in-granparadiso then
[05:32] <asac> but not yet in pipeline
[05:33] <shirish> asac: one thing though, the description is kinda off for this, maybe you could set it right
[05:33] <shirish> Description: modifications for ubuntu firefox (default) install
[05:33] <shirish>  Extension package for firefox, that ships various modifications for the ubuntu default install of firefox.
[05:33] <shirish> 
[05:33] <shirish>  You can uninstall this package if you prefer to use a genuine firefox install.
[05:34] <shirish> asac: see you buddy, will be bbl
[05:37] <asac> DarkSun88: thanks
[05:38] <DarkSun88> asac: ;)
[05:39] <DarkSun88> asac: Your version is *ubuntu2, right?
[05:43] <asac> for xulrunner?
[05:43] <asac> probably
[05:43] <asac> yes
[05:43] <asac> did it fail or what?
[05:43] <DarkSun88> asac: Ok.
[05:44] <DarkSun88> No no.
[05:45] <DarkSun88> asac: Currently building again
[05:46] <asac> good ... ;)
[05:46] <asac> for a secod i felt this pain ... you know ;)
[05:46] <DarkSun88> :D
[05:58] <DarkSun88> asac: On i386 it's ok.
[05:59] <DarkSun88> Waiting for others arch.
[05:59] <hjmf> asac: howdy, just stepping in!
[05:59] <hjmf> bug 124016
[05:59] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 124016 in sun-java5 "added Xb-Npp-xxx tags accordingly to "firefox distro add-on suport" spec" [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/124016
[05:59] <hjmf> probably tonight when I'll be back I'll do sun-java6-plugin
[05:59] <hjmf> if not then tomorrow morning
[06:04] <asac> hjmf_: great ... thanks
[06:04] <asac> probably upload tonight ... everything else went in already
[06:31] <asac> DarkSun88: two architectures failed?
[06:31] <DarkSun88> asac: No, three successfully built. :)
[06:31] <asac> ah ;)
[06:34] <asac> gnomefreak: build succeeded?
[06:41] <DarkSun88> asac: Last architecture.
[06:42] <DarkSun88> (i64)
[06:42] <DarkSun88> ia*
[07:05] <asac> gone for a few hours
[07:41] <gnomefreak> asac: yep it did
[08:08] <gnomefreak> asac: are you updating granparadiso or did they not release a tarball for it
[09:05] <hjmf> asac: sun-java6-plugin: bug 124059
[09:05] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 124059 in sun-java6 "added Xb-Npp-xxx tags accordingly to "firefox distro add-on suport" spec" [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/124059
[09:13] <shirish> guys anybody here has firefox-granparadiso?
[09:15] <gnomefreak> shirish: what ubuntu and what is the question
[09:16] <shirish> gnomefreak: I'm on FF3 alpha 5 & there is no option to save page as a pdf
[09:16] <shirish> gnomefreak: wired tells me that this was introduced in FF3 alpha 3
[09:16] <shirish> http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/2007/04/firefox_3_alpha.html
[09:16] <gnomefreak> do you have a link for pdf
[09:16] <shirish> gnomefreak: look up :)
[09:17] <gnomefreak> shirish: wired isnt working on it and you didnt give me link to the pdf
[09:17] <shirish> gnomefreak: right, wired isn't working on it, would investigate & report further. They reported it hence thought its there.
[09:18] <gnomefreak> shirish: your missing point. not everything happens when it is first said to happen. can i have a link to the pdf please
[09:19] <shirish> gnomefreak: I think I must have jumped the gun, there is no link to the pdf atm, I'm trying to find out
[09:23] <gnomefreak> shirish: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/3.0a3/releasenotes/ doesnt say anything about it
[09:24] <shirish> that's what I got, dunno from where the wired guys got that added.
[09:24] <gnomefreak> neither does a1 or a2
[09:25] <gnomefreak> if you dont hear it from a source that would know be very carefull what you believe, im not saying its not there but its a good chance that it was postponed
[09:27] <shirish> gnomefreak: got it, although it would be cool to have that
[09:30] <gnomefreak> yeah and its proibly in the windows or mac versions
[09:32] <shirish> gnomefreak: will check out l8ter & let u know if its there, as they have moved on alpha 7
[09:38] <shirish> gnomefreak: another thing, .xpi are not associated with either firefox or firefox-granparadiso, shouldn't they be or are there other apps. (besides archives which can use .xpi)
[09:39] <shirish> besides archive managers like Xarchiver & like
[09:39] <gnomefreak> .xpi are different source
[09:40] <gnomefreak> they are not built with firefox (except for lang packs
[09:43] <shirish> right, what I was thinking is its just an extension, just like .odt for openoffice.org, so shouldn't they be associated with each other, or is this something that should be done upstream?
[09:44] <gnomefreak> is firefox the only ones that use .xpi?
[09:45] <gnomefreak> .odt == open office doc  .exe == windows archive(for most part)
[09:47] <gnomefreak> shirish: btw afaik both of these are wrong: # Boomarks are now called Places, new menu structure
[09:47] <gnomefreak> # Save web pages as PDF
[09:47] <gnomefreak> atleast on linux
[09:48] <shirish> gnomefreak: wikipedia talks of all mozilla browsers, but 4 other apps. which I don't think have nothing to do with browsers, seems to be similar to the .exe you were stating.
[09:49] <shirish> gnomefreak: you are right, bookmarks is known as places & they got that one wrong also, save pages on pdf (isn't even in the alpha 6 release notes also).
[09:49] <gnomefreak> and if you look at link they gave you to release notes none of those are stated
[09:49] <gnomefreak> and they are behind
[09:50] <gnomefreak> im uploading alpha 6 atm they are still on 4
[09:50] <gnomefreak> :)
[09:50] <shirish> wow, you are doing this on ubuntu straight alpha 6 or on debian also
[09:51] <gnomefreak> just feisty atm
[09:51] <shirish> I am sure you noticed the wishlist bug I had put yesterday about alpha 6
[09:51] <gnomefreak> debian can get thier own
[09:51] <shirish> ah ok, feisty, on gutsy :(
[09:51] <gnomefreak> shirish: nope
[09:51] <gnomefreak> maybe
[09:51] <shirish> :)
[09:51] <gnomefreak> i saw alot of bugs yesterday
[09:51] <shirish> I'm sure
[09:52] <gnomefreak> 40+ bugs yesterday iirc
[09:53] <shirish> wow, that's a big big triage
[09:53] <gnomefreak> no not really
[09:53] <gnomefreak> hjm^f does alot more
[09:53] <gnomefreak> alot maybe like 100+ a day
[09:54] <gnomefreak> when he does them
[09:54] <shirish> wow, that's quite a lot of bugs
[09:54] <gnomefreak> when firefox has 500+ bugs you have to
[09:55] <gnomefreak> asac: i finally got my first bug on iceape (that i didnt file) and its a damn crash if i had to guess without seeing the debugging info its cario
[10:02] <gnomefreak> i guess i can replace old tarball with new one
[10:08] <shirish> gnomefreak: enjoy yourself, will be looking forward to alpha 6 whenever its ready to hit gutsy :)
[10:08] <shirish> cheers
[10:23] <gnomefreak> when is sprint week?
[10:26] <gnomefreak> alphs6 in feisty preview archives
[10:38] <asac> gnomefreak: does trunk build?
[10:38] <asac> gnomefreak: does it crash for you?
[10:39] <asac> or display wierd stuff on shutdown on console?
[10:39] <gnomefreak> so far it built i havent gotten crash in feisty yet
[10:39] <gnomefreak> give me a few minutes to finish email and ill run through a series of tests
[10:39] <asac> hjmf: i dropped a comment on your java5 debdiff
[10:40] <gnomefreak> wtf is wrong with people
[10:40] <asac> hjmf: in  your java6 diff it locks good though
[10:40] <hjmf> asac: ok looking
[10:40] <asac> ok i am out ... have to arrive really before i can seriously do anything
[10:40] <asac> 30 minutes i guess
[10:40] <gnomefreak> asac: someone replied to your answer on the ML
[10:41] <gnomefreak> we dont work fast enough is how i read it
[10:41] <hjmf> asac: bug 123687 is the same problem than bug 117575
[10:41] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 123687 in firefox-granparadiso "/usr/lib/firefox-granparadiso/firefox doesnt run" [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/123687
[10:41] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 117575 in firefox "[GUTSY]  Cannot execute /usr/lib/firefox/x-www-browser-bin." [High,Fix released]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/117575
[10:42] <gnomefreak> why is bug #1 in our bugs :(
[10:42] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 1 in Ubuntu "Microsoft has a majority market share" [Critical,In progress]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/1
[10:43] <gnomefreak> son of a bitch
[10:43] <hjmf> yeah gnomefreak :)
[10:43] <gnomefreak> asac: this isnt good! and i think it might have been granparadiso in gutsy i tested :(
[10:43] <gnomefreak> (Feisty)gnomefreak@GutsyGibbon:~$ firefox-trunk
[10:43] <gnomefreak> Couldn't read application.ini
[10:43] <gnomefreak> the patch seems to not have worked
[10:51] <gnomefreak> no patch maybe ok since i didnt add applications.ini to it
[10:58] <hjmf> asac: gnomefreak, I'm not sure if it is the same problem, I think I'm too tired to be productive at this hour, I'll look at it tomorrow evening
[10:58] <hjmf> cu
[10:59] <gnomefreak> anyway in my chroot it doesnt launch crash or anything else except couldnt read applications.ini
[11:00] <gnomefreak> asac: did you try granparadiso yet?
[11:00] <asac_> sorry had a call
[11:00] <gnomefreak> its k
[11:00] <asac_> ok
[11:01] <asac_> whats the problem?
[11:01] <asac_> but let me get something to eat first
[11:01] <gnomefreak> ok ill be in a nd out
[11:01] <asac_> i built granparadiso a6 ...
[11:01] <asac_> however its somehow instable
[11:01] <gnomefreak> and?
[11:01] <asac_> which i refer to cairo
[11:01] <asac_> when i shutdown i get crash
[11:01] <asac_> 100% reproducible
[11:02] <asac_> its an assertion crash
[11:02] <gnomefreak> cant be any worse than getting Couldn't read application.ini on start up
[11:02] <asac_> do you see it in console on trunk?
[11:02] <asac_> hmm application.ini
[11:02] <asac> gnomefreak do you steill have built directory?
[11:02] <gnomefreak> i get that error and it brings me back to prompt
[11:02] <gnomefreak> yes
[11:02] <asac> its probably just not installed
[11:02] <asac> go to debian/firefox&
[11:02] <asac> debian/firefox/
[11:02] <asac> directory
[11:02] <asac> inside it try to find that file
[11:03] <asac> is it there?
[11:03] <asac> somewhere beneath
[11:03] <asac> do a deep search
[11:03] <asac> in console like find | grep application.*ini
[11:03] <gnomefreak> debian/firefox-trunk?
[11:03] <asac> yeah
[11:03] <asac> sorry forgot that you are using trunk ;)
[11:04] <gnomefreak> no
[11:04] <gnomefreak> find | grep application.*ini just gives me prompt
[11:05] <asac> hm
[11:05] <asac> ko
[11:05] <asac> and if you do that find in build-tree ?
[11:05] <asac> might give you garbage
[11:05] <asac> please just look careful if there is any application.ini in between
[11:07] <gnomefreak> they seem to be in build-tree/mozilla
[11:07] <gnomefreak> there are 4 or so
[11:07] <gnomefreak> ./browser/app/application.ini seems likely to be the one?
[11:07] <asac> probably
[11:07] <asac> whatothers?
[11:07] <asac> do exist?
[11:08] <gnomefreak> ./extensions/python/dom/test/pyxultest/application.ini
[11:08] <gnomefreak> ./extensions/layout-debug/application.ini
[11:08] <gnomefreak> ./dist/bin/application.ini
[11:08] <gnomefreak> ./browser/app/application.ini
[11:08] <asac> yeah
[11:08] <asac> stupid mob
[11:08] <asac> you see ... its exactly like with our build failure
[11:08] <asac> they give a damn shit about standard way of doing linux build
[11:08] <asac> they just forget to add that file to install:: target
[11:09] <asac> as they just don't remember that there is somebody out there who runs make install
[11:09] <asac> ok
[11:09] <asac> lets look
[11:09] <asac> it should be missing in browser/app/Makefile.in
[11:09] <gnomefreak> they are all there
[11:09] <asac> he?
[11:09] <gnomefreak> all the application.ini are there
[11:09] <asac> yes ... but not installed, right?
[11:10] <gnomefreak> how would i find out if installed?
[11:10] <gnomefreak> they werent in debian/
[11:11] <asac> yeah then they are not installed
[11:11] <asac> it looks complicated
[11:11] <asac> e.g. they just have in that makefile
[11:11] <asac> DIST_FILES = application.ini
[11:11] <asac> which means they have some generic make rule coded for that variable
[11:12] <asac> probably in config/rules.mk
[11:12] <asac> (which is where most of their generic make system code lies)
[11:13] <gnomefreak> i dont see a config/rules.mk
[11:13] <asac> yeah they just coded it and ignored install target
[11:13] <asac> its in mozilla/config/rules.mk
[11:13] <asac> http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/config/rules.mk
[11:13] <asac> thats the file
[11:14] <asac> search for dist_files
[11:14] <asac> and you see that they just have a libs:: target for it
[11:14] <asac> nothing about install::
[11:14] <asac> gnomefreak: do you have orig.tarball somwhere?
[11:14] <asac> of what you try to build?
[11:14] <asac> and pushed your changes to mt branch or so?
[11:14] <gnomefreak> yes the one made with build
[11:15] <gnomefreak> asac: already done
[11:15] <asac> good ... where can i get the orig?
[11:15] <asac> is it on your server?
[11:15] <gnomefreak> yep
[11:15] <asac> i have to do a patch for that ... again
[11:15] <gnomefreak> give me a sec ill get link
[11:15] <asac> do you have url at hand?
[11:15] <asac> cool
[11:16] <gnomefreak> http://gnomefreak.youmortals.com/mozilla-testing/dists/feisty/main/source/firefox-trunk_2.99+2cvs20070703.orig.tar.gz
[11:16] <asac> gratias
[11:17] <asac> and bzr branch url?
[11:17] <gnomefreak> getting
[11:17] <asac> sftp of mozilla branch or something
[11:17] <asac> though i should be able to figure out
[11:17] <asac> how is the branch called?
[11:17] <asac> trunk?
[11:17] <gnomefreak> do you want sftp or http
[11:17] <asac> just tell me the name
[11:17] <asac> the rest i can see on my own
[11:18] <gnomefreak> trunk i think
[11:18] <gnomefreak> im frozen
[11:18] <gnomefreak> cant do anything but type here
[11:18] <gnomefreak> brb
[11:28] <asac> there you are :)
[11:29] <gnomefreak> brb strange dog
[11:29] <gnomefreak> n-m is borked
[11:30] <asac> nm is my realm :(
[11:30] <asac> i don't feel good about it
[11:31] <asac> tomorrow i have to wlan router + usb dongle ... and pray that this works
[11:31] <asac> in my lunchtime :(
[11:31] <asac> and i need a power adapter for uk
[11:33] <asac> gnomefreak: did you push to mt branch?
[11:33] <gnomefreak> its not connecting i have to disconnect and reconnect it :( ok whats up with firefox-trunk
[11:33] <gnomefreak> yes
[11:33] <gnomefreak> i hope so
[11:33] <gnomefreak> bzr push sftp://gnomefreak@bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/trunk
[11:34] <gnomefreak> yep i did
[11:34] <gnomefreak> looked with arrow ;)
[11:34] <asac> ok
[11:34] <asac> i got it
[11:34] <asac> lets see
[11:34] <gnomefreak> k
[11:34] <asac> this might take some time ;)
[11:35] <gnomefreak> take your time
[11:35] <gnomefreak> when did you adopt n-m?
[11:35] <asac> as was voluntold
[11:36] <asac> i was
[11:36] <gnomefreak> lol
[11:36] <gnomefreak> sorry to hear that
[11:36] <asac> actually if i don't have enough time i can push it away
[11:36] <asac> but i like the challange
[11:36] <asac> actually i am more a high level programmer and always hated things that have remotely todo with hardware
[11:36] <asac> me too :-D
[11:38] <asac>  quilt new config_rules_install_dist_files
[11:38] <asac> Patch config_rules_install_dist_files is now on top
[11:38] <asac> quilt add config/rules.mk
[11:38] <asac> File config/rules.mk added to patch config_rules_install_dist_files
[11:38] <asac> ok ... now lets fix rules.mk ;)
[11:38] <gnomefreak> 2 patches?
[11:38] <gnomefreak> oh and next time you might want to type that in terminal
[11:39] <gnomefreak> hmmmmm
[11:39] <gnomefreak> places menu changed i think
[11:39] <gnomefreak> starting to look alot like windows :(
[11:40] <asac> in fox?
[11:40] <gnomefreak> no in gnome menu
[11:41] <asac> what is windowish now?
[11:41] <gnomefreak> places>Documents and places>bookmarks
[11:46] <gnomefreak> asac: problem
[11:46] <gnomefreak> i saw this in -devel and i didnt even know we had a middle click patch
[11:47] <gnomefreak> asac: bug 124084
[11:47] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 124084 in firefox "patch dropped: disable middle-click paste" [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/124084
[11:49] <asac> ok lets see whats worth this patch
[11:50] <gnomefreak> im looking into lost patch maybe we took it out for a reason
[11:53] <asac> gnomefreak: rejected
[11:53] <asac> its now in ubufox
[11:53] <asac> as almost every preference tweak
[11:53] <asac> i commented accordingly
[11:53] <gnomefreak> asac: i dont think hes gonna like that
[11:53] <asac> doesn't matter
[11:54] <asac> its just the smarter way
[11:54] <gnomefreak> i agree
[11:54] <gnomefreak> grabbing firefox now so i can merge to mozillateam branch
[11:55] <asac> k
[11:55] <asac> gnomefreak: if he complains ... let me know
[11:55] <asac> i have a huge bugmail backlog atm
[11:55] <gnomefreak> k
[11:55] <asac> because i worked too much on other things
[11:55] <asac> time is getting short of getting all my specs implemented
[11:56] <asac> and the mobile browser eats time too
[11:56] <asac> i want almost all of my specs be done by end of july
[11:57] <asac> so i can concetrate on stabilizing and bug fixing till gutsy is out
[11:57] <asac> gnomefreak: if there is something serious popping up ... like firefox doesn't run for a bunch of users anymore, please raise
[11:58] <asac> otherwise it might go unseen for too long
[11:58] <asac> same for thunderbird ... my picture of thunderbird state is atm a bit too blurry imo
[11:59] <asac> gnomefreak: http://people.ubuntu.com/~asac/config_rules_install_dist_files
[11:59] <asac> thats the path
[11:59] <asac> its not verified if it fixes it
[11:59] <asac> but i think so
[11:59] <asac> build still going
[11:59] <asac> if you want to prefetch it go ahead
[12:00] <asac> and tell me if you want to push this to mt branch or if i should push it
[12:00] <asac> just add to series at the end
[12:01] <asac> gnomefreak: now its good ... i uploaded a bogus version
[12:01] <asac> first
[12:02] <asac> you can pull if you want or wait till i confirmed that it works
[12:02] <asac> pull == prefetch the patch from my p.u.c account
[12:08] <gnomefreak> ok
[12:08] <gnomefreak> ill grab it throw it  in and wait
[12:10] <gnomefreak> once you confirm ill build and make sure it works on feisty build (im assuming your doing gutsy) and ill push it
[12:11] <gnomefreak> i can use the practice with bzr
[12:14] <asac> sure
[12:14] <asac> its your branch
[12:17] <asac> gnomefreak: ok ... you have to add application.ini to firefox-trunk.install
[12:18] <asac> same goes for platform.ini ?
[12:18] <asac> otherwise the patch looks good
[12:18] <asac> if you want i can do the firefox-trunk.install modification
[12:18] <asac> but maybe just try
[12:18] <gnomefreak> ok i have to add it
[12:18] <asac> its /usr/lib/firefox/application.ini
[12:18] <asac> and probably platform.ini in same directory
[12:19] <asac> just verify after build if both files are installed in debian/firefox-trunk/usr/lib/firefox/
[12:20] <gnomefreak> i dont see application.ini in debian/firefox-trunk/usr/lib/firefox-trunk
[12:21] <asac> gnomefreak: look in the patch
[12:21] <asac> gnomefreak: it will not be there until you applied patch and build
[12:21] <asac> the patch is to install it there ;)
[12:22] <asac> actually it will end up in debian/tmp/usr/lib/firefox-trunk by make install
[12:22] <asac> you have to add that file to firefox-trunk.install to get it installed in package target directory
[12:22] <asac>  -- which is debian/firefox-trunk/usr/lib/firefox-trunk
[12:22] <asac> like i just said :)
[12:22] <asac> gnomefreak: look in the patch ... there is a typo in it
[12:23] <gnomefreak> in the config/rules.mk patch?
[12:23] <asac> in documentation (in the top) DEST_FILES --> should be DIST_FILES
[12:23] <asac> yes its just a documentation typo
[12:23] <asac> look in
[12:23] <asac> you will see
[12:23] <gnomefreak> yes i see it
[12:24] <gnomefreak> in the comments under --evaluation
[12:26] <gnomefreak> ok so in debian/firefox-trunk.install i add application.ini and platform.ini right?
[12:27] <gnomefreak> debian/firefox-trunk/usr/lib/firefox-trunk/application.ini
[12:27] <gnomefreak> like that?
[12:27] <asac> gnomefreak: ok ... please add another documentation line to the patch ... right on top:
[12:27] <gnomefreak> k
[12:27] <asac> This is from:
[12:27] <asac>   https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386904
[12:27] <ubotu> Mozilla bug 386904 in Build Config "DIST_FILES and DIST_CHROME_FILES not implemented for install:: target in config/rules.mk" [Normal,New] 
[12:28] <asac>   https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=270967
[12:28] <asac> ^^ those three lines ... then add two new-lines before text begins
[12:28] <asac> thanks
[12:28] <gnomefreak> above --summary