=== ubotu [n=ubotu@ubuntu/bot/ubotu] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [01:17] Admiral_Chicago: be careful using the name junk [01:17] there are junk projects (if you wan tto get rid of a branch you assign it to +junk or junk cant remember [01:25] btw firefox needs to start opening in tabs [01:28] i hate LP now [03:58] gnomefreak: how can I rename my project, probably in LP [03:58] why do you hate it now btw === Admiral_Chicago_ [n=Freddy@adsl-68-72-80-116.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === DarkMageZ [n=richard@238.101.233.220.exetel.com.au] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [04:32] gnomefreak: if its on code.launchpad.net/~freddymartinez/+junk it should be fine no? [04:32] after all, people will need to know its freddymartinez and who I am to check it out [04:38] i'm editing the wiki pages now, looking to more or less streamline the pages. [04:39] the bugs page for example, could be less pages and not so many subpages [04:40] /tags, /states, etc [04:58] Admiral_Chicago_: should be fine just thought i would let you know [04:59] ah === Admiral_Chicago_ [n=Freddy@adsl-68-72-80-116.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === DarkMageZ [n=richard@ppp121-44-43-70.lns3.syd7.internode.on.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [09:23] morning [09:31] hey there asac [09:34] hey ... still away ;) [09:34] ? [09:37] Admiral_Chicago: did your bzr branch work out well? [09:38] yes it did [09:49] great === jeromeg [n=jerome@gra94-2-82-66-142-60.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [10:19] yep, I have to work on packaging some more today i think [10:19] asac: btw, i've started some work on the wiki pages. [10:20] good good ... i have a new idea on howto improve our bug overview :) [10:21] its like ... producing summaries of bug duplicate clusters [10:21] e.g. look at master bugs and produce a summary of all duplicates [10:22] my idea is to parse out the info of each bugs summary entry [10:22] and put them on one page [10:22] so for a top-crash we can see all initial reporter comments on one page [10:22] hopefully being able to get a better idea on how to reproduce === Admiral_Chicago is trying to get that all in his head [10:23] hehe [10:23] late i know ... and early for me [10:23] not a good mix :) [10:23] definetly no [10:23] not* [10:24] lets see [10:24] i understand I think [10:25] bug 91519 [10:25] has 2 duplicates [10:25] we would get a summary like: [10:25] Launchpad bug 91519 in firefox "MASTER Firefox Crash [@~nsCOMPtr_base] [@~nsInstallInfo] [@nsSoftwareUpdate::InstallJarCallBack] " [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/91519 [10:25] bug 91519 - "MASTER Firefox Crash [@~nsCOMPtr_base] [@~nsInstallInfo] [@nsSoftwareUpdate::InstallJarCallBack] " [10:26] - just did a upgrade on kubuntu to feisty [10:26] - Firefox crash downloading extension [10:26] After downloadind "Download them all" extension plugin firefox crashed. Yesterdad that plugin was completely undownloadable. [10:26] - no comment [10:26] :) [10:27] i don't know if this should be done by bughelper ... or maybe just by a greasemonkey script [10:27] that goes through all duplicates and injects the content to the main bug page === DarkMageZ [n=richard@ppp121-44-43-70.lns3.syd7.internode.on.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [10:46] oh. I see [10:46] hmm, seems like something to discuss with the bug team [10:47] this would ba a headache if people mark as dups things that aren't [10:49] i think parsing LP and dumping to a wiki is a better idea [10:50] that could be done easily in Python by someone like red_herring [10:54] hmm [10:54] don't really see the difference ... whatever way ... getting a summary of summaries might be beneficial :) [10:55] i think there is a big difference. [10:55] where? [10:55] i mind be too dump in the morning :) [10:57] s/mind/might/ [10:57] i think by doing something wiki style we can sort out common lines [10:57] hehe [10:57] == bug xone === [10:57] === @~nsComp== [10:57] ah ok [10:57] === bug xtwo === [10:58] !@~nscomp [10:58] Sorry, I don't know anything about nscomp - try searching on http://bots.ubuntulinux.nl/factoids.cgi [10:58] and each subsection gets the summary? [10:58] yep, and this way we can all easily edit comments, LP doesn't let you delete comments (yet_ [10:58] so when I screw up, it won't be so bad [11:03] hmm [11:03] no i don't mean to add it persistently [11:04] its just that you provide a summary on that site [11:08] ah i see [11:53] gnomefreak: debian bug 297293 [11:53] Debian bug 297293 in mozilla-thunderbird "mozilla-thunderbird: profiles imported from (older) mozilla mailnews might fail to copy mail to Sent-Folder" [Important,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/297293 [11:53] received a reply [11:54] gnomefreak: .... you can close it :) [12:19] asac: do you have a min for a merge? [12:19] :) [12:23] its fixed? [12:25] how the hell do you close debian bugs :( [12:26] gnomefreak: by mail [12:27] using something like status: closed ? [12:27] bluekuja: i have the feeling that its more than a minute [12:27] bluekuja: :) [12:27] gnomefreak: close is deprecated [12:27] gnomefreak: look at bugs.debian.org [12:27] there is doc [12:27] k [12:27] its simple [12:31] nnn-done@debian.org is the nnn the bug number? [12:31] yeah [12:31] and i dont see a reason on bug why its being closed? [12:31] if you know that it has been fixed in a specific version [12:31] you can add [12:32] Version: 1.4.5-3 [12:32] as first line [12:32] with two line feeds after [12:32] gnomefreak: you can include reason in mail [12:32] just send mail to nnn-done@bugs.debian.org [12:32] add Version line (if applicable - this time its not applicable) [12:32] then add comment why its closed [12:32] done [12:33] send the mail and its closed [12:33] have you uploaded a fix for it? [12:33] no [12:33] asac: lol [12:33] we don't know the version [12:33] asac: believe me, is a minute [12:33] :) [12:33] so you can just send to -done [12:33] bluekuja: its already 10 minutes :) ... counting [12:33] :D [12:33] was eating [12:33] :) [12:34] asac: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/balsa/+bug/124330 [12:34] Launchpad bug 124330 in balsa "Merge balsa (2.3.17-1) from debian unstable" [Wishlist,Confirmed] [12:34] asac: i need a reason to close it or is the reason becasue he cant reproduce? [12:34] gnomefreak: i have to do the nspluginwrapper merge in bzr [12:34] otherwise i cannot get this back in sync [12:34] in future we should not do debdiffs ... if its in bzr [12:34] its a pita [12:34] gnomefreak: yeah you can answer on the mail he send ... modify bug address [12:34] (to -done) [12:35] and say "thanks for the info ... closing." [12:35] please don't just send ... but answer on the mail he send so it doesn't break threads for me [12:37] asac: diff ok? [12:38] bluekuja: if its in bzr ... then no :) [12:38] otherwise yes [12:38] bzr? [12:38] why? [12:39] anyway it's not in bzr [12:39] ^^ [12:39] because bzr causes headaches [12:39] lol [12:39] if its a new debian merge [12:39] the merge should be done in bzr properly then [12:39] anyway no, it's not in bzr [12:39] ;) [12:40] (i'm talking about balsa) [12:40] it builds correctly [12:40] what is balsa? [12:40] the merge [12:40] something sound related? [12:40] I told you about [12:40] ooh [12:40] mm [12:41] do you know what it does ... do you know how to test? [12:41] it's a mail client [12:41] test what? [12:41] test if it works [12:42] and if what debian claims to be fixed is really fixed [12:42] (if they claim something at all) [12:42] it's an upstream release [12:42] in debian [12:42] bug 297293 [12:43] debian bug 297293 [12:43] Debian bug 297293 in mozilla-thunderbird "mozilla-thunderbird: profiles imported from (older) mozilla mailnews might fail to copy mail to Sent-Folder" [Important,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/297293 [12:44] oh thats the one i jsut did [12:44] asac: why these questions for a merge? [12:44] because imo it makes no sense to merge something you don't test [12:45] i will raise that soon ... because i have the feeling that most merges are done that way in universe [12:45] and that is plain bad [12:45] usually [12:45] MOTUs does not check [12:45] debian package [12:45] yeah ... that has to change imo [12:45] yea [12:45] i mean we cannot prevent people from not checking [12:45] yea [12:45] but we have to remember them that they don't do merges for the sake of having somthing that builds [12:46] but for having something that works [12:46] yup [12:46] asac: anyway that's an upstream release [12:46] so nothing [12:46] that is fixed [12:46] et all [12:47] yes ... but does it work at all :) [12:47] ? [12:47] asac: e.g builds? [12:47] or application [12:48] i thought we just talked about what matters [12:48] (for me) :) [12:49] lol [12:49] :D [12:49] wanted to be sure [12:49] ^^ [12:49] oh damn [12:49] bluekuja: builds is a prerequisities of works [12:50] 5 mins and work [12:50] :/ [12:50] up [12:50] *yup [12:50] that is not a problem [12:50] for me yes [12:50] lol [12:50] just drop info when you are ready ... application is build-tested and tested to work :) [12:50] I dont like working [12:50] :P [12:50] yeah ... my condolesence ... working can suck :) [12:50] hehehe [12:50] yeah [12:51] that's it [12:51] asac: when I'm back, gonna install it [12:51] and test [12:51] then ping you [12:51] and then party [12:51] ^^ [12:52] asac: are you away too this night? [12:53] e.g party [12:53] no idea [12:53] maybe [12:53] most likely cinema [12:53] so not really party :) [12:54] cinema is cool too [12:54] :) [12:54] but i have to relax ... e.g. no compuer ... next week will be hard enough [12:54] :) [12:54] I leave [12:54] lot of work this afternoon [12:54] :/ [12:54] cya later [01:12] debian bug 405585 [01:12] Debian bug 405585 in iceape "iceape fails to save preferences for "general.skins.selectedSkin"" [Normal,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/405585 [01:15] hmm [01:15] do we have that too? [01:32] someone just reported it and i cant get debians bug to take on our report [01:33] he? [01:33] asac: bug 124365 [01:33] Launchpad bug 124365 in Debian "Iceape-Browser: Theme setting reverts on restart" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/124365 [01:33] if that is the upstream bug for us ... just set it as upstream [01:33] i marked it as a debian bug but wrong bug now i cant get right bug in there [01:34] so use upstream with debians bug report? [01:34] just set remote bug tracker [01:34] to debian ... and set bug id [01:34] cant [01:34] of course you can [01:34] if you do it wont open [01:34] he? [01:34] it will automatically do that [01:34] on next run [01:34] just set it properly [01:34] and done [01:35] the bug id is already correct [01:35] look at it now [01:35] yeah launchpad is broken [01:35] next time do it right ;) [01:36] ask on launchpad [01:36] this is the bug # that is correct. opent he bug id in debian line [01:36] #launchpad [01:36] ok i added a new upstream [01:36] debian bug 405748 [01:37] Debian bug 405748 in iceape-browser "iceape-browser: theme selection reset to classic" [Normal,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/405748 [01:37] you did use distribution [01:37] not upstream [01:37] is what the bug should be set to [01:37] asac: its not upstream is it? [01:37] its upstream [01:37] since we use upstream tarball [01:37] anyway now its again wrong [01:37] fix it please [01:37] i used the bug id you pasted [01:38] and you used the wrong bug number [01:38] i used the one you intiially pasted [01:39] but its the same bug [01:39] look up 10 lines see debian bug 405748 [01:39] Debian bug 405748 in iceape-browser "iceape-browser: theme selection reset to classic" [Normal,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/405748 [01:39] so why bother? [01:39] asac: thats why i was trying to change it [01:39] yes you pasted that too late [01:39] the first bug i gave was closed [01:39] not very helpful being closed [01:39] debian bug 405585 [01:39] Debian bug 405585 in iceape "iceape fails to save preferences for "general.skins.selectedSkin"" [Normal,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/405585 [01:39] its open [01:39] so whats theproblem? [01:40] Bug is archived. No further changes may be made. [01:40] Then, I'll just close this bug. [01:40] Mike [01:40] ok i fixed the debian target [01:40] ty [01:40] it just worked [01:41] probably launchpad was down orsomething [01:41] i set upstream target to invalid again now [01:41] close upstream now? [01:41] ah ok [01:41] yes [01:41] i still cant reproduce this at all [01:42] in debian bug there is probably a workaround? [01:42] no i didnt see one [01:44] chrome.rdf broken [01:44] let user attach his [01:44] from profile [01:45] gnomefreak: ok nspluginwrapper pushed [01:45] i guess you tested :) [01:45] i had to edit a bit because i had to do that in bzr [01:45] no [01:45] oh [01:45] have no amd64 at hand [01:45] anyway ... i added info that i sponsored to changelog [01:45] so if it breaks blame me [01:46] as i modified your debdiff byhand et al [01:46] so i could apply it to bzr [01:46] ty if it breaks its still not your fault [01:46] remember me never to ask for debdiff on bzr maintained software again :) [01:46] than it is your fault :) how would you like it ? [01:46] we now have a debian branch as well [01:46] so we can update that and then merge changes that happened over at debian by bzr merge [01:47] ...e.g. like i did now [01:47] that makes merging a bit easier [01:47] gnomefreak: for bzr the best is to do the merge locally ... bring it up on private branch and tell maintainer, that your merge is available from there [01:47] yeah [01:48] anyway ... the tricky stuff remained ... e.g. that we had changes against a file ... that upstream directly applied to a patch [01:48] yeah [01:48] anyway ... now all should be on track and future merges should be even more easier [01:48] otherwise the merge went well with bzr [01:48] ty :) [01:48] just had to setup a debian branch :) [01:48] which i previously didn't ;) === Admiral_Chicago_ [n=FreddyM@adsl-68-72-109-250.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [01:49] gnomefreak: if you get build errors let me know :) [01:49] i cant build it [01:49] wont let me build binaries [01:50] and it lets me know when they start to build (i assume it got htat far its good) [01:51] brb smoke [01:57] asac: is that your n-m push that i just got update for? [01:57] yesterday? [01:58] you might have pushed it yesterday [01:58] its ubuntu6? [01:58] i filied bug report yesterday on n-m [01:59] ok its seb [01:59] hope he pushed to bzr as well [01:59] reboot == no network i have to click it uncheck enable network and than enable it again :( [01:59] gnomefreak: no changes [01:59] no changes? [01:59] so no need to try [01:59] nothing that can be of any relevance [01:59] ah [02:00] its just something for build systems [02:01] did -trunk build? [02:02] gnomefreak: it definitly build ... but i won't push it ... haven't tested if it also crashes ... its just for me to track down when the regression occurs [02:02] k [02:02] the idea was to begin to maintain a weekly builds in gutsy ... so we can track such things down more easily in future === DarkSun88 [n=Ma@ubuntu/member/darksun88] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [02:05] Hi all [02:06] gnomefreak: you should remember to checkin and publish bzr whenever you upload trunk [02:07] i had to add a changelog entry on my own [02:07] hey there DarkSun88 [02:07] or is that pushed to ~gnomefreak? [02:07] asac: did you push? [02:07] and i just took wrong one? [02:07] i don't push anything [02:07] i pushed to mozillateam [02:07] and i won't [02:07] i havent made a personal branch yet [02:07] yeah ... but you did not have a commit for the 0628 release [02:07] so i had to fiddle around [02:08] so remember ... evertime upload ... you need a changelog commit for that [02:08] thought you pushed the 28 release [02:08] asac: i will [02:08] gnomefreak: i will not push anything from the past [02:08] unless others need to test [02:08] gnomefreak: great [02:08] what day are you leaving for sprint week/ [02:08] sunday [02:08] saturday return [02:09] anything you need done for next week? [02:09] but i will take the weekend off when i return i guess [02:10] DarkSun88: hmm, you're a member, got a link to your wiki? [02:10] hmm ... you mean for the beginning of next week ... or for the end of next week? [02:10] Admiral_Chicago: One moment. [02:10] anyway ... don't have much in mind ... except finding this damn sunbird issue [02:10] and finishing my specs :) [02:10] Admiral_Chicago: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MicheleAngrisano [02:10] asac: things that should be done for when you return [02:11] ah ... yeah figure out when regression appeared in trunk [02:11] but lets see if this build works [02:11] looking [02:12] DarkSun88: i've seen this wiki page before, when did you get membership? [02:12] Admiral_Chicago: yes DarkSun88 is a member [02:12] they were approved [02:12] 2007-05-29 [02:12] gnomefreak: :) [02:13] ah okay === gnomefreak took hint from your cloak [02:13] i could tell from the cloak [02:13] gnomefreak: damn the build failed because apparently the orig was truncated [02:13] i actually just update my wiki, so I should be good for a while. Still have another year and a half at least [02:13] e.g. upload aborted [02:13] don't ask me why [02:14] my tarball is too small [02:14] asac: what one? [02:14] maybe connection reset [02:14] 0628 [02:14] ah ok [02:14] let me repull [02:14] and sping [02:14] asac: what revision are you pulling? [02:15] http://gnomefreak.youmortals.com/mozilla-testing/dists/feisty/main/source/firefox-trunk_2.99+2cvs20070628.orig.tar.gz [02:15] thats the idea [02:16] 31MB ... mine was just 27 [02:16] ah [02:16] what happened :) [02:16] hmm [02:16] ok ... should be there in a minute [02:41] seems the sources are messed up in the repo [02:44] i cant even extract the .dsc [02:46] speaking of packaging, i'm having some issues here too [02:46] oh well, thats okay [02:48] i'll have to figure it out soon [02:49] im off to go to meeting ill be back in a few hours [02:50] asac: its the source that was uploaded to mt repo that is wrong im grabbing from bzr and we will see what happens [02:50] gnomefreak: which sources? [02:50] the 20070628 [02:50] the orig looks good [02:51] the diff is off and that is blocking the .dsc from extracting [02:51] unfortunatley you need to modify a lot because we have no revision for that build [02:51] yes ... you don't need thediff [02:51] gnomefreak: you don't need to build that anyway [02:51] i will test later [02:51] pleas go for new builds ;) [02:51] if i rm the .diff the .dsc fails to extract with error no diff [02:51] in case this issue is *just resolved [02:52] usptream [02:52] ill work on it when i get home ill start the latest upstream build [02:52] k out for now [02:53] sure ... take care [02:53] Admiral_Chicago: do you use cdbs [02:53] or debhelper? [02:53] (pure debhelper that is) [02:55] dh_make [02:55] ok so pure debhelper [02:55] Admiral_Chicago: i wouldn't use dh_make in the long run [02:55] just to get an initial template [02:55] ya, i think i'm going to try something different [02:55] Admiral_Chicago: just use cdbs [02:55] its plain straight forward [02:56] goodness, I just grabbed some source from a guy to package, its aweful.. [02:56] and there are plugins [02:56] Admiral_Chicago: is it C or what? [02:58] sec, taking a call [03:03] asac: take a look at the bzr repo freddymartinez9@bazaar.launchpad.net/~freddymartinez9/+junk/main/ [03:03] its the magnify project [03:04] can i still branch it? [03:05] should be able to [03:06] Admiral_Chicago: its empty :) [03:07] probably junk stuff gets removed in batches ;) [03:07] at least its not in http [03:07] and cannot access that path by sftp [03:07] maybe you can resurrect it in lp ? [03:08] yea, looking now [03:08] note: its empty ... but i could branch [03:08] so its somehow existing ... unless +junk/* is a zero archive script :) [03:09] Admiral_Chicago: hmmm [03:09] it branches 3 revisions [03:09] but is empty [03:09] :) [03:09] lets see [03:10] what about code.launchpad.net/~freddymartinez9/+junk/main [03:10] odd, Mario was able to grab it earlier today [03:10] both should work [03:11] .bzr directory is 2.7m [03:11] so its in there [03:11] however [03:11] http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/28796/ [03:12] looking... [03:12] for meit looks like its a repo checkout [03:12] hmm [03:12] lets branch it from here [03:12] again [03:14] ok [03:14] odd, i have my branch as commited 12 minutes ago on LP [03:14] that was my last bzr push [03:15] could do bzr checkout [03:15] through http? [03:16] i don't know how he did it [03:16] like bzr branch http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~freddymartinez9/+junk/main [03:16] can you do it? [03:17] its broken ... maybe its gutsy bzr thats broken? [03:17] but actually i think ist been doen by junk cronjob or something [03:17] no, i'm using gutsy [03:17] however ... its strange that i have no idea howto get the files out :) [03:17] Admiral_Chicago: so you can do the above command and get files? [03:18] do bzr checkout freddymartinez9@bazaar.launchpad.net/~freddymartinez9/+junk/main [03:19] hey [03:19] why don't you try asac@bazaar.launchpad.net/+asac/firefox/trunk :) [03:19] why don't you try asac@bazaar.launchpad.net/~asac/firefox/trunk :) [03:19] ~bzr: ERROR: Target directory "main" already exists. [03:19] yeah you have to remove main first [03:20] anyway ... revive that branch ... otherwise i cannot really look at it :) [03:20] and i checked out lots of other branches today ... so it should work ;) [03:20] what do you mean main? [03:21] if you get [03:21] ~bzr: ERROR: Target directory "main" already exists. [03:22] it means that main directory exists ;) [03:22] wait.. i get you i think [03:25] can you bring this up to a good branch? [03:25] i can't figure out how to fix it.. [03:25] e.g. maybe just push again :) [03:25] to normal location [03:28] i did a bzr uncommit [03:28] let me push that [03:30] try now [03:31] uncommit brings you sources [03:31] ? [03:31] lets try [03:31] uncommit fails for me :) [03:32] at least from what i checked out through http [03:32] ok let me know when its avail in a non-junk place :) [03:35] i'll have to look at it soon. === Admiral_Chicago afk [03:50] gnomefreak: damn thing the crash is already on 0628 [03:51] gnomefreak: did you see crashes during normal use or just during shutdown? [03:53] yeah ... anditcrashes when starting it for first time after upgrade [03:58] bluekuja: libagg needs attention today [03:58] you need to strip non-free sources from it [03:58] and please ensure its documented properly ... so in future one has the chance to get it [04:06] bluekuja: debian bug 431987 is yours [04:06] please prepare an update asap ;) === Admiral_Chicago [n=FreddyM@adsl-68-72-109-250.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === asac_ [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [05:16] asac: TBH it never crashed here on 6/28 [05:17] not that i saw (in feisty) === jeromeg [n=jerome@gra94-2-82-66-142-60.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [05:25] yeah ... i already think its a caio regression [05:25] of the bad sort [05:25] e.g. not a binary issue, but aheader issue [05:25] asac: baby sent me a mail [05:25] bluekuja: yeah [05:25] not a nice one [05:25] ^^ [05:25] yeah ... she is stupid [05:25] i already talked to her [05:25] I noticed [05:26] not saying she is stupid ... but he forgets ... and then behaves trollish [05:26] anyway I gonna have a showa [05:26] then go away for a while (shop) [05:26] and then here [05:26] ;) [05:26] bbl [05:26] have fun [05:26] ty [05:26] yw :) [05:27] bluekuja: just remember what you have learned. don't jump in on train [05:27] i already said everything she needs to know [05:27] asac: dont worry [05:27] asac: than i say before we do anything further someone needs to look into cario. who is the person that maintains cario? [05:27] today I'm feeling good [05:27] dont want to start another war [05:27] hehe [05:27] no need to [05:27] great [05:27] really [05:27] :) [05:28] life is hard enough without such things ;) [05:28] gnomefreak: i will take care for this crash atm [05:28] asac: right words [05:28] cant we skip cario? [05:28] :) [05:29] we could ship the in-source cairo [05:29] but that is a stupid thing todo [05:29] we do trunnk exactly for that reason [05:29] true [05:29] e.g. to get to know about issues early [05:29] so we are happy we are seeing it now [05:29] and not when 3.0 is final [05:29] now we have all time we need [05:35] i hope so, there is still a bit of issues upstream has to work out our major issue is cario (once fixed i can spin iceape on it and have it tested) since ive seen a crash report already [05:37] if that person responds again that we should support google-desktop extention for firefox im gonna go off :( [05:38] with google-desktop ff extention ffox crashes without it it doesnt crash i think the g-d-e is made by google but we should support his crash anyway [05:39] bbl emergency [05:42] gnomefreak: only trunk is affected afaik [05:42] right? [05:42] so iceape should not be blocked by that [06:49] asac: back [06:50] asac: now, I test balsa [06:50] so I can leave for the party, happy [06:50] :P [06:52] asac: I hope you're still there [06:54] good [06:54] i am almost gone [06:54] have to do shopping [06:54] please wait it [06:54] :) [06:54] pleaes take care for agg [06:54] asac: don't worry, I'll take care of it better than my gf :P [06:54] as well ... heym no chance ... i am starving ... time is running low here :/ [06:54] hehe [06:55] I re-read miriam mail [06:55] is a little less aggressive [06:55] "but I feel I [06:55] wasted all the time I spent starting to package it, and definitely a bit [06:55] pissed of at not having been even notified about it." [06:55] yeah [06:55] i reminded here that i told here [06:55] she remembered [06:56] but after 5 minutes she trolled again [06:56] so i let her alone [06:56] mmm [06:56] i mean the people that need to know ... know now [06:56] why did she not pm me? [06:56] because 1st. pm is bad [06:56] 2nd ... how should she know how you are [06:56] 3rd ... she wanted to have something to complain about in channel [06:57] yeah [06:57] so she retrieves visibility [06:57] yeah [06:57] I'm happy that you talked with her [06:57] should I answer to that mail? [06:57] I want to [06:57] i talked to rene ... who she complained to first [06:57] and her [06:57] ;) [06:58] i don't know [06:58] asac: should I answer? [06:58] not instantly ;) [06:58] ^^ [06:58] I think she's a little less angry [06:58] now [06:58] ^^ [06:59] say her ... sorry, butyou was told that she knew [06:59] ... and that you will spend her a bear when you see her at some point :) [06:59] :D [06:59] maybe offer her to take that package back ... but she probably will not wantto [07:00] ok [07:00] she repeated that in channel ... as i already offered her that [07:00] channel? [07:00] but she said ... no ... a mail would have been fine. [07:00] which? [07:00] debianists are never in ubunt channels [07:00] so d.d [07:00] OFTC then [07:01] ok i am really out now ... i might take a look later ... but no guarantees [07:01] yes right [07:01] bye [07:01] lol [07:01] have fun with your movie [07:01] :) [07:01] sure [07:01] cya! === rhelmer [n=rhelmer@people.mozilla.com] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === JenFraggle [n=jen@91.84.43.217] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [07:52] hey everyone [07:52] hi [07:52] Admiral_Chicago: are you an op in #kubuntu? [07:53] no [07:53] oh ok [07:53] you need someone with ops? [07:53] no i am op if i need it [07:54] i was gonna walk away and its getting a bit offtpic [07:54] i'll keep an eye out [07:54] i wish I had ops, been helping there since forever...oh well. [07:57] talk to riddell he can give you them [07:58] nah, I don't feel like asking for op access, its one of those things people are appointed for [08:00] yeah dont remind me :(