[03:09] <jbailey> lamont: Lalala how's things?
[03:31] <lamont> latest kernel is building atm
[03:32] <jbailey> Is there a newer -7?
[03:32] <lamont> -8.15
[03:32] <lamont> mind you, it's ftbfs on amd64, so hope is kinda sketchy atm
[03:32] <jbailey> Eh, handy.
[03:33] <jbailey> I haven't seen a fix commited notification.
[03:33] <lamont> well, if it's not, then definitely pester for -8.16, eh?
[03:38] <jbailey> I'm pestering in the kernel channel.
[03:41] <lamont> so I should just nuke the 8.15 build?
[03:41] <jbailey> Yes.
[03:41] <jbailey> And it's FTBFS on ppc and sparc.
[03:42] <jbailey> So it's NFG anyway.
[03:42] <jbailey> lamont: I'm looking for cheap <$100/month colo in SF for my hppa boxes.
[03:43] <jbailey> If I can't find some, do you have access to cheap colo anywhere near you?
[03:43] <lamont> 1U, metered, $100/mo here
[03:43] <jbailey> Hmm
[03:44] <lamont> ISTR 30 kbits/sec on 95th percentile for the meter
[03:44] <lamont> 2U
[03:44] <jbailey> Hmm
[03:44] <jbailey> Anything more than $100 a month is more than I'm willing to put out for this hobby.
[03:44] <lamont> OTOH, the nice man at Qwest told me that they might be able to give me DSL end of september.
[03:44] <lamont> I'm debating how much I believe him
[03:44] <jbailey> You can get DSL.
[03:44] <jbailey> It just won't be faster than the string and tin cans that you have now. ;)
[03:44] <lamont> no string
[03:45] <jbailey> Heh =)
[03:45] <lamont> DSL won't be metered...
[03:45] <jbailey> Aren't you 15km from the CO?
[03:45] <lamont> < 17250 feet from the RT
[03:45] <lamont> and ISTR the spec really says 18000
[03:46] <lamont> they have been claiming 15000
[03:46] <jbailey> interesting.
[03:46] <lamont> which may just mean that the infrastructure isn't quite ready for it
[03:46] <lamont> it == more customers
[03:46] <jbailey> Well, if this comes true, got room for a spare a500 and zx6000? =)
[03:46] <lamont> I think we could make room
[03:46] <jbailey> Need 4 network ports. =)
[03:46] <lamont> that part is no issue.
[03:47] <jbailey> The ia64 could, I suspect, be powered down most of the time.
[03:47] <lamont> given the machines, a little help with the power and bw bill wouldn't hurt.
[03:47] <jbailey> Yup.
[03:47] <lamont> I fear that I run on the order of 100KWh/day
[03:47] <jbailey> Are you time-of-day metered?
[03:48] <lamont> no
[03:48] <lamont> I could be, but it would cost more
[03:48] <jbailey> Right.  Just if you already were, we could test suspend-to-disk on the boxes are particular times of days. =)
[03:48] <lamont> oh gag.
[03:48] <lamont> we could do that anyway... it's the cron'ed wakeup thing that I want to see...
[03:49] <jbailey> The ia64 supports wake-on-lan, anyway.
[03:49] <lamont> there's always lan traffic
[03:49] <jbailey> wake-on-lan is a particular packet sent to a particular mac address.
[03:50] <jbailey> So, let's keep this in mind.  If I can wind up feeding you less than $100/month for having basically two build boxes on your site, that would be lovely.
[03:50] <jbailey> They're just way too noisy to keep in a small SF apartment.
[03:51] <lamont> heh
[05:56] <lamont> jbailey: glibc building on bld-4, fwiw
[05:58] <jbailey> Thanks.  I hadn't noticed that doko'd uploaded.
[05:58] <jbailey> bld-5 is still chugging away on gcj for me.  Again. =)
[06:23] <jbailey> It should want gcc-4.2
[06:23] <lamont> gcc-4.2 [hppa] 
[06:23] <lamont> yep
[06:23] <lamont>   apache2-utils apt base-files bsdutils cpp-4.1 debianutils dmsetup dpkg
[06:23] <lamont>   dpkg-dev g++-4.1 gcc-4.1 gcc-4.1-base initscripts libblkid1
[06:23] <lamont>   libdevmapper1.02.1 libstdc++6-4.1-dev mount sysv-rc sysvinit sysvutils
[06:23] <lamont>   util-linux
[06:23] <lamont> to upgrade in the chroot
[06:24] <lamont> it would relieve some pain of mine
[06:24] <jbailey> Cool.  Beyond that it doesn't required gcc-4.1
[06:25] <jbailey> I just didn't bother [!hppa] ing them.