[10:39] <asac> Admiral_Chicago: hmmm .... you have the bug id? we should probably add the search engines of firefox to paradiso as well ... so if you come around, maybe assign to me and set to "in progress" :)
[10:40] <gnomefreak> asac: only a couple of more days left of sprint :)
[10:40] <asac> yeah :)
[10:40] <asac> tomorrow ... finito
[10:40] <gnomefreak> get anything good done?
[11:22] <gnomefreak> i see your working on n-m ;)
[11:38] <asac> yeah justuploaded nm
[11:38] <asac> dunno if it fixes things for you
[11:38] <asac> though
[11:38] <asac> gnomefreak: what are the nm issues you are seeing?
[11:43] <gnomefreak> doesnt connect at log in
[11:44] <gnomefreak> log in you get a red x on the icon, right click and uncheck enable networking, right click check enable networking than it scans and connects
[11:45] <gnomefreak> asac: bug 124297
[11:45] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 124297 in network-manager "network-manager doesnt connect me at startup anymore" [Undecided,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/124297
[11:53] <gnomefreak> asac: also bug 45008 seems to have been fixed upstream for only the 1.5 branch :(
[11:54] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 45008 in firefox "MASTER firefox theme crash" [High,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/45008
[12:01] <gnomefreak> what tag is used after adding upstream task?
[12:31] <asac> gnomefreak: ok
[12:32] <asac> so you are struck a race condition
[12:32] <asac> are there ubuntu7 packages already available?
[12:32] <gnomefreak> running update now ill let you know as soon as its done
[12:34] <gnomefreak> nope still ubuntu6
[12:39] <gnomefreak> asac: i have the build you uploaded i just havent built it since i saw you say it was uploaded
[12:54] <gnomefreak> asac: when you get time can you look at bug 124223 (doesnt matter when) Im thinking of rejecting it since its a tab plus issue not a firefox one, but would like to know your thoughts on extension crashes/breakage/ect..
[12:54] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 124223 in firefox "Ubuntu's Firefox ceased to work with Tab Mix Plus extension" [Low,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/124223
[01:01] <asac> gnomefreak: let me look
[01:04] <asac> gnomefreak: new policy is: when people report bugs in gutsy, they must use the Report a Bug ... Menu entry in firefox
[01:04] <asac> gnomefreak: i rejected that bug for that reason for now
[01:04] <asac> and asked to open a new one
[01:04] <gnomefreak> how do you know they didnt use that?
[01:04] <asac> because there are no attachments attached
[01:05] <asac> we now have attachments through hooks for what extensions and plugins are installed for instance
[01:05] <asac> gnomefreak: maybe report a testbug to see
[01:05] <gnomefreak> oh ok
[01:09] <asac> http://people.ubuntu.com/~brian/testing_graphs/
[01:09] <asac> thats interesting
[01:09] <asac> though the history does not go back that far
[01:13] <asac> ... for now
[01:14] <gnomefreak> goes back a year
[01:14] <gnomefreak> well sort of
[01:20] <gnomefreak> i thought i have seen everything until yesterday, someone wanted to backport gcc4.2 to feisty becasue his game needed 4.2 :(
[01:28] <DarkMageZ> that would have been interesting to see
[01:29] <DarkMageZ> was that a bug report or irc discussion?
[01:29] <gnomefreak> DarkMageZ: it wont work. it was in -motu
[01:30] <DarkMageZ> i know it would mess things up something horrid :)
[01:30] <gnomefreak> everything would need to be rebuilt since everything depends on tool-chain
[01:31] <DarkMageZ> i was thinking of having alook @ the game and seeing if dropping the configure check on gcc would work
[01:31] <gnomefreak> he never stated game name or anything helpful
[01:33] <DarkMageZ> aww, that ruins my fun. oh well.
[01:36] <gnomefreak> lmao @ bug 124995
[01:36] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 124995 in firefox "failure to commect to internet" [Undecided,Invalid]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/124995
[01:53] <DarkMageZ> i don't know how he managed to install ubuntu
[01:53] <DarkMageZ> must have brought one of those dells
[01:53] <gnomefreak> what is with the private bugs?
[01:56] <DarkMageZ> private bugs? security bugs get to be private.
[02:00] <gnomefreak> bug 125379
[02:00] <ubotu> Bug 125379 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/125379 is private
[02:02] <DarkMageZ> i'd say it's a security bug and someone from the security team hasn't declassified it yet.
[02:02] <gnomefreak> its not a security issue since its a simple crash but i asked why it was marked that way
[02:03] <gnomefreak>  	   Keep bug confidential
[02:03] <gnomefreak> Make this bug visible only to its subscribers
[02:03] <gnomefreak> 	Security vulnerability
[02:03] <gnomefreak> Select this option if the bug describes a security vulnerability
[02:03] <gnomefreak> they are spearate
[02:03] <gnomefreak> security isnt marked just confidential
[02:04] <gnomefreak> done with bugs for time being
[02:40] <gnomefreak> asac: the n-m is fixed thank you :)
[02:50] <asac> gnomefreak: really?
[02:50] <asac> can your please try multiple times?
[02:50] <gnomefreak> asac: yep really and i will soon
[02:51] <gnomefreak> i want to get tarball built first than log out and than build trunk on newest to see how far they have gotten
[02:51] <asac> gnomefreak: you hope for cure?
[02:51] <gnomefreak> asac: hey without hope whatelse is there with mozilla :(
[02:51] <asac> ;)
[02:51] <gnomefreak> its worth a shot atleast
[02:52] <gnomefreak> cairo is a known issue to them (atleast said it on one of the pages i looked at lastweek)
[02:52] <gnomefreak> ok brb logging out
[02:54] <AnRkey> asac, you work on the netinstaller for ubuntu?
[02:55] <asac> netinstaller ? ... no ... network-manager ... yes
[02:55] <AnRkey> oh ok
[02:55] <AnRkey> do you know who does the netinstaller?
[02:55] <AnRkey> or how to find out
[02:55] <AnRkey> or what it's called
[02:56] <asac> ask on #ubuntu-installer
[02:56] <AnRkey> ahh ok
[02:56] <AnRkey> thanks
[03:00] <gnomefreak> asac: tested 4 times total and still works like a charm :)
[03:00] <asac> great
[03:01] <asac> so ... can you digg through the network-manager bugs and find bugs that might refer to your behaviour?
[03:01] <asac> :)
[03:01] <gnomefreak> lol
[03:01] <asac> you don't need to, but if you find some, I would be happy to close them and ask reporters to reopen
[03:01] <asac> in case they still see
[03:01] <gnomefreak> asac: yeah ill get there  sometime today
[03:02] <gnomefreak> did this fix any other issues?
[03:02] <gnomefreak> wifi issues? wifi password issues i saw iirc
[03:02] <asac> i am on the wifi password manager issues now
[03:02] <asac> ... as well on the signal 5 crashes
[03:03] <asac> i doubt that this has fixed it
[03:03] <gnomefreak> ah ok those make up biggest part of the bugs
[03:03] <asac> actually i think the wifi password issues are more keyring related
[03:03] <gnomefreak> i would think so and that needs to be fixed as well :(
[03:03] <asac> though there is definitly a bug in wpa supplicant in case you have more than 2 cells or somethnig
[03:04] <asac> gnomefreak: let me see if keyring is fixed now
[03:04] <gnomefreak> ok i dont think it has been fixed here (gnome-keyring-manager
[03:04] <asac> so ... short out ... because of reconnecting to wireless
[03:04] <gnomefreak> )
[03:10] <asac> hmm ... keyring appears to work for me
[03:11] <gnomefreak> asac: ok let me try it here
[03:11] <asac> at least it does for my network manager now
[03:12] <gnomefreak> not for nautilus yet it seems but will keep playing with it
[03:12] <asac> what does nautilus have to do with keyring?
[03:12] <asac> whatfor?
[03:13] <gnomefreak> asac: connecting to ftp server user/password is not remembered after checking remember always
[03:14] <gnomefreak> morons :(
[03:14] <gnomefreak> not you someone that doesnt know how to use apt
[03:17] <gnomefreak> asac: heres a n-m bug :( bug 125522
[03:17] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 125522 in network-manager-pptp "refusing mppe stateful " [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/125522
[03:17] <gnomefreak> ok im gone for a little while been working for 5 hours already
[03:17] <gnomefreak> its only 9:17am :(
[04:12] <asac> gnomefreak: is flashplugin-nonfree not installable for you atm ?
[04:30] <asac_> gnomefreak: ok found the problem ... adobe rolled an update jul 10
[04:30] <asac_> and mirrors are out of synch now
[04:30] <asac_> :(
[04:30] <asac_> once they are in synch again we have to sru flashplugin-nonfree
[04:30] <asac_> :(
[04:30] <asac_> pretty unfortunate now that flashplugin nonfree is finally build for amd64
[04:52] <asac> ok out for a smoke
[06:10] <bluekuja_> asac: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=431987
[06:10] <ubotu> Debian bug 431987 in agg "contains copy of non-free gpc" [Serious,Open] 
[06:12] <bluekuja_> asac: need to delete that source file, and upload new revision
[06:12] <bluekuja_> let me know when back
[06:20] <asac> bluekuja_: you don't need me for that :)
[06:21] <asac> just prepare update and point me to it, so i can sponsor
[06:21] <bluekuja_> asac: of course :)
[06:21] <bluekuja_> fixing
[06:21] <asac> bluekuja_: you have to prepare a new source package in case you are in doubt
[06:21] <bluekuja_> and pushin
[06:21] <bluekuja_> to bzr
[06:21] <asac> use the same version+dfsg as new upstream version
[06:21] <asac> e.g. 1.0
[06:21] <asac> 1.0+dfsg-1
[06:21] <bluekuja_> ok
[06:21] <asac> as package version
[06:22] <bluekuja_> I gonna use a new tarball
[06:22] <bluekuja_> I'll create
[06:22] <bluekuja_> ;)
[06:22] <bluekuja_> asac: you'll have to explain me dfsg stuff
[06:24] <asac> when we free sources we add +dfsg to the upstream version
[06:25] <asac> as its not the identical tarball as upstream
[06:25] <asac> which is actually what rene didn't do so we didn't see
[06:26] <bluekuja_> ok
[06:26] <bluekuja_> asac: if version is agg (2.5-1)
[06:26] <bluekuja_> previous
[06:26] <bluekuja_> should be agg (2.5+dfsg-1)?
[06:26] <bluekuja_> or 2?
[06:32] <bluekuja_> asac: ^^
[06:37] <asac> yeah
[06:37] <bluekuja_> asac: and anyway, I don't have to create a new source package, if we maintain it in bzr
[06:37] <asac> -1
[06:37] <asac> he?
[06:37] <asac> you definitly have
[06:37] <bluekuja_> yeah, but on bzr how?
[06:37] <asac> the non-free sources must not be on the ftp servers
[06:37] <asac> bzr rm
[06:37] <bluekuja_> yea
[06:37] <bluekuja_> that's what I said
[06:37] <bluekuja_> :)
[06:37] <bluekuja_> we misunderstood
[06:37] <bluekuja_> ^^
[06:37] <asac> sure :)
[06:38] <asac> just document the bug id you close so i can review if the files are out et al :)
[06:38] <asac> cool
[06:38] <bluekuja_> asac: ok, now I push to both bzr branches
[06:38] <bluekuja_> so you can bzr bd and go
[06:38] <bluekuja_> ;)
[06:59] <bluekuja_> asac: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~bluekuja/libagg/debian.source
[07:00] <bluekuja_> asac: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~bluekuja/libagg/upstream.source
[07:02] <bluekuja_> asac: should be ok ;)
[07:08] <asac> ok .... let me see
[07:08] <bluekuja_> asac: btw diff-ext got 2 RC bugs
[07:08] <bluekuja_> ^^
[07:08] <bluekuja_> both related
[07:09] <bluekuja_> now I'm investigating
[07:09] <bluekuja_> I've provided a dbg package for a better traceback
[07:10] <asac> i won't get any of those things done now ... I have to leave soon ... we are going to the theatre soon
[07:10] <bluekuja_> asac: don't worry, I have really no time
[07:10] <bluekuja_> on this period
[07:10] <bluekuja_> I've bought a new motorbike
[07:10] <bluekuja_> ^^
[07:10] <asac> oh
[07:10] <bluekuja_> also work
[07:10] <asac> ok ... take care
[07:10] <bluekuja_> and friends
[07:11] <bluekuja_> but one hour per day
[07:11] <bluekuja_> should be here
[07:11] <bluekuja_> :)
[07:11] <bluekuja_> asac: I'll let you know when I've fixed those
[07:11] <bluekuja_> agg is ok for now
[07:11] <bluekuja_> ;)
[07:12] <bluekuja_> leaving now
[07:12] <bluekuja_> good theatre then
[07:12] <bluekuja_> take care too
[07:12] <bluekuja_> ;)
[07:13] <asac> yeah ... remind me tomorrow :) ... or at best at the weekend ;)
[07:13] <asac> who knows whatelese i have to do
[07:13] <bluekuja_> will be away
[07:13] <asac> ok out
[07:13] <bluekuja_> for the weekend
[07:13] <bluekuja_> all from now on
[07:13] <bluekuja_> ;)
[07:13] <bluekuja_> tomorrow I'm here
[07:13] <bluekuja_> cya!
[07:13] <bluekuja_> ;)
[07:13] <asac> cool
[07:13] <asac> bye
[08:22] <hjmf_> gnomefreak: in bug 125379 to the OP why he filed the report as private
[08:22] <ubotu> Bug 125379 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/125379 is private
[08:22] <hjmf_> gnomefreak: there is a new policy about crash reports
[08:22] <hjmf_> gnomefreak: --> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CrashReporting
[08:23] <hjmf_> gnomefreak: "Bug reports about crashes which are automatically generated by the Apport system are now private by default. This avoids exposing potentially sensitive data like passwords to the public. Those bug reports are now inspected by a trusted Ubuntu developer before marking it public."
[08:23] <hjmf_> HTH :)
[08:23] <hjmf_> gnomefreak: that applies to gutsy crashes
[08:23] <hjmf_> ;)
 gnomefreak: in bug 125379 to the OP why he filed the report as private
[08:25] <hjmf_> of course I meant to say: in bug 125379 *you asked* to... :)
[08:25] <ubotu> Bug 125379 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/125379 is private
[08:25] <ubotu> Bug 125379 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/125379 is private
[10:01] <gnomefreak> asac: flash is looking for version 9.0.31 but the tarball they used stayed the same name but the package is the newest release(dont remember release) i look at it the other night found out the problem nut not real sure what is needed to fix. did the newest upstream lose all regressions it had? if so i dont see an issue upgrading it if not we have to stop it from looking for that tarball. but yes it doesnt install it has no files 
[10:01] <gnomefreak> hjmf: thank you, sorry noone was ablet o tell me why it was marked private when i was there (noone in -bugs) for some odd reason
[10:11] <gnomefreak> asac: from what i saw of it md5sum in scripts should do it i dont rmemember a version number in there but if there is that needs to be changed as well