[02:31] <TheMuso> c
[02:31] <TheMuso> ugh
[11:22] <amitk_> lamont: ping
[11:23] <amitk_> lamont: did 2.6.22-8 fix bug 123178 for you?
[11:51] <kraut> moin
[01:35] <Jaghound> latest gutsy (after apt dist-upgrade this morning) seems to have initramfs breakage
[01:35] <Nafallo> Jaghound: what has that to do with the kernel then? :-)
[01:36] <Jaghound> I got dropped to initramfs busybox, because directory /dev/disk/by-uuid does not exists
[01:36] <Nafallo> Jaghound: -> #ubuntu-devel
[01:36] <Jaghound> Nafallo: #kubuntu-devel people told me to come here :-)
[01:36] <Jaghound> this is like a service desk, everybody trnasfers :-)
[01:36] <Nafallo> hehe
[01:37] <Jaghound> transfers 
[01:37] <Jaghound> ok, I try the plain ubuntu folks then
[01:37] <Nafallo> sounds like udev anyway, and that's not kernel.
[01:37] <Jaghound> sure
[03:18] <BenC> pkl__: 124194 is fix released as of the last kernel upload
[03:19] <BenC> pkl__: it's actually a dupe of another bug, but I'd just mark it fix-released and move on
[03:20] <BenC> doko: ping, re: bug 74691
[03:20] <amitk_> benc: any plans to apply patch for custom DSDTs to gutsy?
[03:21] <doko> BenC: no idea at first sight
[03:22] <BenC> doko: I remember this in feisty, but it was fixed in the kernel...perhaps there's something that needs to be done in bfd to read the newer files right?
[03:22] <zul> hello
[03:23] <amitk_> benc: feel like applying the patch in bug 54621?
[03:24] <BenC> amitk_: for some reason, I thought the patch was there, but if not we can definitely get an updated one in that applies for 2.6.22
[03:24] <amitk_> benc: I will work on it
[03:24] <doko> BenC: I'll look at upstream gdb sources, but probably at the end of the week; subscribed to the report
[03:24] <BenC> doko: can I assign it to you in the meantime as well?
[03:25] <doko> BenC: well, if you like ...
[03:26] <BenC> doko: helps me to remember what's going on with it :)
[03:26] <BenC> doko: thanks
[03:27] <doko> hrm, gdb-6.7 didn't branch yet ...
[03:34] <amitk_> benc: want a patch for 54621 on kernel-team?
[03:36] <BenC> amitk_: I think 54621 looks good
[03:36] <BenC> I'm doing an initramfs-tools upload real quick
[03:37] <amitk_> benc: I meant - Do you want a patch or should I upload?
[03:37] <zul> oh yeah can you pull in my crack as well
[03:37] <BenC> amitk_: patch and push :)
[03:37] <BenC> zul: is your crack cleaned up? :)
[03:37] <zul> it is
[03:38] <zul> no reverts no nothing..
[03:38] <BenC> zul: Ok, can you resend the pull request and we'll get it in?
[03:38] <zul> sure..
[03:38] <zul> do i have to pull in the latest updates?
[03:43] <BenC> amitk_: if you update status of bug to something other than confirmed (e.g. fix-committed or fix-released), please give it an importance level and assign to self
[03:43] <amitk_> benc: ok
[03:44] <BenC> amitk_: and for the ppl sub'd, it's usually a good idea to tack a little note saying "applied, will be in next kernel upload"
[03:44] <BenC> amitk_: thanks
[03:45] <zul> BenC: done
[03:46] <amitk_> benc: I can't assign importance
[03:47] <BenC> amitk_: hmm, that's not good
[03:47] <amitk_> i was told only QA could do that?
[03:50] <BenC> amitk_: we're going to get you added to QA :)
[03:50] <BenC> the whole canonica-kernel-team should be distro-qa
[03:50] <BenC> or ubuntu-qa I mean
[04:12] <lamont> amitk_: 2.6.22-8.18 still has the issues.  My git repo on kernel.u.c has all the fixes that I need.
[04:12] <lamont> you want a git-format-patch of them?
[04:14] <amitk_> lamont: could you check out latest git tree and make sure everything needed is in there? If not, then please provide a tree to pull from or format-patch
[04:14] <lamont> ok
[04:14] <amitk_> I had to break up the patch because parts were already applied
[04:16] <lamont> amitk_: and this was -8.18?
[04:17] <BenC> amitk_, pkl__: Ok, no kernel upload today, so let's work toward the upload for post-tribe-3
[04:17] <BenC> seems like we have some momentum, so no need to waste it :)
[04:17] <amitk_> ok
[04:17] <amitk_> lamont: no.. get the HEAD
[04:22] <lamont> git fetch origin HEAD?
[04:23] <amitk_> 'git pull' should do it if you had already rebased to -8.18
[04:24] <lamont> git diff origin shows no differences between my tree and ubuntu-gutsy, so I'll give it a roll.
[04:24] <lamont> BenC: assuming this builds, any chance of changing your mind about an upload today?
[04:25] <amitk_> lamont: if you haven't rebased to the last kernel, git pull might very well fail
[04:25] <amitk_> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelGitGuide
[04:25] <lamont> just did a 'git fetch origin; git rebase origin', all seems to be current there
 Never use git pull.  use git fetch and an appropriate git merge command instead
[04:29] <lamont> (actually, he asserts that git-pull will either go away or change semantics in 1.6)
[04:29] <amitk_> everybody should be permitted their own threshold of laziness =)
[04:38] <lamont> amitk_: btw, looks like we split the patches the same way, since the rebase had no conflicts. :-)
[04:38] <lamont> I do _love_ git.
[04:39] <lamont> just wish I understood it better.
[04:39] <lamont> otoh, a git-repack in ubuntu-gutsy from time to time would be nice.
[04:46] <abogani_> BenC: I received an error from "fakeroot debian/rules custom-binary-rt" ...
[04:46] <abogani_> /home/alessio/ubuntu-rt/ubuntu-gutsy/debian/build/custom-source-rt is not clean, please run 'make mrproper'
[04:48] <abogani_> To my eyes this dir is ok... :-(
[06:51] <lamont> amitk_: missing one or two things... I'll make a tree for you
[06:52] <amitk_> lamont: great
[06:52] <lamont> looks like just one debian/control* change
[06:52] <lamont> of course, trashing my git tree didn't help. :-(
[06:57] <lamont> is building the kernel source just a matter of debian/rules insertchanges; dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -S  ?
[06:57] <amitk_> lamont: only the control.stub.in should be required, right? Everything else is autogenerated?
[06:57] <lamont> ah, ok.
[06:57] <lamont> if it's autogenerated, why is it committed instead of in .gitignore?
[06:57] <amitk_> good question. Perhaps nobody put it there? BenC?
[07:04] <lamont> amitk_: so am I right on how to build the source package?
[07:13] <BenC> lamont: no need to insert changes
[07:14] <lamont> BenC: well, I was figuring on building -8.18hppa1 :-)
[07:14] <lamont> so a good changelog never hurts.. :)
[07:14] <BenC> lamont: we don't gitignore debian/changelog because we like to keep it in the tree...just insertchanges is what we do just before upload
[07:14] <lamont> control and control.stub were the question
[07:15] <lamont> that is, since control{,.stub} are generated from control.stub.in, shouldn't they be ignored?
[07:15] <BenC> lamont: fakeroot debian/rules clean will generate those
[07:15] <BenC> lamont: eh, hard for them not to exist at all in most cases
[07:15] <BenC> so would have to answer lots of questions from git users
[07:16] <lamont> right
[07:16] <lamont> I guess that works
[07:16] <lamont> BenC: any chance of getting you to ln ubuntu-gutsy.git to .git somewhere and saying 'git repack'?
[07:17] <lamont> that would greatly speed up cloning head, I expect
[07:17] <kylem> next person to screw up permissions on zinc is going to get a stab to the face.
[07:17] <BenC> lamont: how are you cloning?
[07:17] <lamont> git clone git://kernel.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ubuntu-gutsy.git ubuntu-gutsy
[07:17] <BenC> git:// or ssh method should not be retrieving anything that isn't referenced anyway
[07:18] <lamont> remote: Generating pack...
[07:18] <lamont> remote: Done counting 507072 objects.
[07:18] <lamont> remote: Deltifying 507072 objects.
[07:18] <lamont> remote:  100% (507072/507072) done
[07:18] <lamont> Indexing 507072 objects...
[07:18] <lamont> remote: Total 507072, written 507072 (delta 399909), reused 492712 (delta 385643)
[07:18] <lamont>  100% (507072/507072) done
[07:18] <lamont> Resolving 399909 deltas...
[07:18] <lamont>  100% (399909/399909) done
[07:18] <lamont> Checking 22582 files out...
[07:18] <lamont>  100% (22582/22582) done
[07:18] <lamont> so it'll still take that small eternity of processing?
[07:18] <lamont> admittedly, that's not precisely from ubuntu-gutsy..
[07:18] <lamont> which was also slow
[07:19] <BenC> lamont: repacked
[07:21] <BenC> guess I should prune as well
[07:22] <lamont> git fetch origin
[07:22] <lamont> ...
[07:22] <lamont> * refs/heads/origin: does not fast forward to branch 'master' of /srv/kernel.ubuntu.com/git/ubuntu/ubuntu-gutsy;
[07:22] <lamont> so how do I overcome that?
[07:23] <BenC> lamont: there's info on KernelMaintenance wiki
[07:30] <BenC> lamont: long document, basically you want to look for git-rebase information
[07:32] <mkrufky> hi guys
[07:34] <mkrufky> id like to know what *I* can do, in order to make it easy for you to take care of the missing firmware issues .... applies to feisty and gutsy, launchpad bugs #90723 and #99107
[07:34] <mkrufky> 90723 deals with dvb-usb-bluebird-01.fw , which I released, and I am the author of the kernel module
[07:35] <mkrufky> 99107 deals with the new, official cx2341x firmware, as released officially by Hauppauge Computer Works ...  Ubuntu is shipping the old, broken firmware, and the new kernel drivers were altered to no longer accept the old, buggy firmware that ubuntu ships... (ivtv, cx88-blackbird, and pvrusb2)
[07:37] <BenC> mkrufky: for feisty, nominate the bugs for feisty, and we'll try to follow up, for gutsy, best bet is to apply to me via email for access to kernel.ubuntu.com so you can put changed into a clone of ubuntu-gutsy-lum that we can pull from
[07:37] <mkrufky> these are kernel bugs that i originally filed against the 2.6.20 kernel for feisty, although they also apply to edgy and dapper... (only 90723 applies to dapper) ... these will also affect gutsy
[07:37] <BenC> mkrufky: requesting an account requires login name and ssh pub key
[07:38] <mkrufky> the bugs were originally filed against feisty, 2.6.20 ... somebody reclassed them to linux-source-2.6.22
[07:38] <mkrufky> hmm, ok.. .i can do that
[07:39] <BenC> do a "Also affects..." and add linux-source-2.6.20 back
[07:39] <mkrufky> will do right now
[07:39] <BenC> I can't guarantee they will make it in feisty (I know they wont for edgy)
[07:39] <BenC> but we definitely want it done for gutsy
[07:39] <BenC> for gutsy, aim it at linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.22
[07:40] <BenC> not linux-source-2.6.22
[07:41] <mkrufky> ah.... thats the problem
[07:41] <mkrufky> the linux-source should all be changed to linux-ubuntu-modules-  :-/
[07:50] <mkrufky> ok, email sent to you, BenC
[07:50] <BenC> mkrufky: will probably take a day or two to finish (I have to forward to admins)
[07:52] <mkrufky> no rush ... thanks
[08:04] <mkrufky> gosh.. .as i keep surfing the open bugs list, i keep running into more and more bugs that i've already dealt with upstream
[08:05] <mkrufky> launchpad is more fun than bugzilla :-P
[09:47] <lamont> amitk_: test build running of lamont/hppa-ia64.git, will advise