=== doko [n=doko@dslb-088-073-070-181.pools.arcor-ip.net]  has joined #ubuntu-toolchain
=== fabbione_ [i=fabbione@gordian.fabbione.net]  has joined #ubuntu-toolchain
=== Starting logfile irclogs/ubuntu-toolchain.log
=== ubuntulog [i=ubuntulo@ubuntu/bot/ubuntulog]  has joined #ubuntu-toolchain
=== infinity_ [n=adconrad@cerberus.0c3.net]  has joined #ubuntu-toolchain
[12:10] <infinity> doko: Around yet?
[12:11] <doko> infinity: yes, but didn't succeed with binutils yet, currently another compiler building ...
[12:11] <infinity> doko: Kay, I have other things to work on, so I'm not blocking on you yet... Just keep me posted.
[12:11] <infinity> doko: Obviously, this is important to some people. :)
[12:12] <infinity> doko: And if you want to triple-check with Intel that our spec file is exactly what they want before I go and build the whole archive with it, that will cure some of my anxiety. :)
[12:13] <doko> infinity: we don't know that ... but I will ask ...
[12:17] <infinity> doko: I just really, really don't want to have to dump the architecture in a week or two and build it all over again.
[12:18] <infinity> doko: partially because it'll be a waste of time, mostly because deleting anything from launchpad is unbelievably difficult.
=== anibal [n=anibal@debian/developer/anibal]  has joined #ubuntu-toolchain
=== tmarble [n=tmarble@user-38q4et6.cable.mindspring.com]  has joined #ubuntu-toolchain
=== jbailey [n=jbailey@modemcable169.10-56-74.mc.videotron.ca]  has joined #ubuntu-toolchain
[04:58] <Mithrandir> doko: are you winning your argument with the toolchain?
[04:59] <doko> Mithrandir: well, currently experimenting with different optimization iptions ...
[05:00] <Mithrandir> ugh
=== tmarble [i=tmarble@nat/sun/x-3fdbd26ded2d4d8b]  has joined #ubuntu-toolchain
=== Starting logfile irclogs/ubuntu-toolchain.log
=== ubuntulog [i=ubuntulo@ubuntu/bot/ubuntulog]  has joined #ubuntu-toolchain