=== yharrow [n=sysadmin@unaffiliated/yharrow] has joined #ubuntu-artwork === tonic-pushcart [n=tonic@203-114-182-35.dsl.sta.inspire.net.nz] has joined #ubuntu-artwork === klepas [n=klepas@ppp167-251-133.static.internode.on.net] has joined #ubuntu-artwork === andreasn [n=andreas@h125n2fls306o1003.telia.com] has joined #ubuntu-artwork === kwwii [n=kwwii@p54954AD4.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-artwork === lapo [n=lapo@host102-254-static.189-82-b.business.telecomitalia.it] has joined #ubuntu-artwork [12:08] hi === klepas [n=klepas@60-242-104-119.tpgi.com.au] has joined #ubuntu-artwork === bersace [n=bersace@did75-13-82-243-217-90.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-artwork === elkbuntu [n=melissa@ubuntu/member/elkbuntu] has joined #ubuntu-artwork === lapo [n=lapo@host23-22-dynamic.9-79-r.retail.telecomitalia.it] has joined #ubuntu-artwork [10:57] hi [11:12] hi lapo [11:12] hey kwwii [11:13] hi kwwii! [11:13] howdy andreasn [11:13] did you go for 24x24 in oxygen/kde4? [11:14] nope [11:15] apparently shipping both 22x22 and 24x24 in the gnome icon set(s) are causing a lot of headache and stuff for panel maintainers [11:15] it was too major of a change this late in the game [11:15] damn [11:15] yeah, believe me, I feel the pain of that [11:15] since I am also responsible for ubuntu [11:16] I guess I need to make someone write better code that isn't so sensitive to a couple of pixels [11:17] ;-) [11:18] andreasn: isn't that code in gnome already fixed? [11:18] I don't think it is [11:18] but I could be wrong [11:19] most stuff looks sharp to me though, so maybe it is === ritvik_zzz [n=ritvik@little-black-box.vmware.com] has joined #ubuntu-artwork