[12:45] <cyph3r> wad up peeps ?
[03:34] <AndyP> i just installed gutsy to a minimal level using debootstrap and noticed that the lilo recommends of the linux-image-* packages are being satisfied by default now so lilo gets pulled in. should i file a bug about that or would it not be a problem for a properly installed system?
[10:04] <stgraber> amitk_: I have added another oops which seems to be related to bug 129226, let me know if there is anything I can try (I'm connected to Internet till 11:30 UTC (prepaid wifi))
[02:59] <abogani> BenC: May i disturb you?
[03:12] <BenC> abogani: sure
[03:12] <abogani> BenC: :-)
[03:13] <abogani> BenC: Now i successfully compiled Lrm for rt but i don't hardware (in this case ati video card) to test the patch. How i should proceed?
[03:15] <zul> BenC: btw I should have a new xen snapshot for the next kernel upload
[03:15] <BenC> abogani: if it compiles, it should be ok
[03:15] <BenC> abogani: get me a patch and I can upload
[03:24] <kraut> amitk_: the nfs-issue is fixed in upstream-kernel 2.6.22 btw.
[03:25] <infinity> BenC: Hey!
[03:25] <infinity> BenC: Hate to be the bearer of nags, but.  Well.  Nag.
[03:25] <infinity> BenC: And lamont's begged me to beg you to apply his hppa love at the same time as you do my lpia upload. :)
[03:25] <BenC> infinity: I gots an lpia prepped kernel upload pending in just a few minutes :P
[03:26] <BenC> infinity: nag nag nag, thought I got rid of my wife damnit :)
[03:26] <kraut> ChangeLog-2.6.22             08-Jul-2007 23:39  3.8M  
[03:26] <kraut> arghs
[03:26] <infinity> BenC: Hey, I know how lonely it is, I'm just trying to fill in.
[03:26] <kraut> much to read :/
[03:26] <BenC> hehe
[03:28] <infinity> BenC: Any chance hppa is in that upload too?  lamont and I are looking to get hppa back into the DC soon.
[03:28] <infinity> (About time...)
[03:28] <infinity> (lpia's obviously more important, though)
[03:28] <BenC> infinity: should be easy to pull his changes in too
[03:28] <infinity> \o/
[03:48] <abogani> BenC: Sorry internet connection problem. Do you have a reply for me?
[03:52] <BenC> BenC abogani: if it compiles, it should be ok
[03:52] <BenC>  abogani: get me a patch and I can upload
[04:50] <BenC> infinity: do we need udeb's for lpia?
[04:50] <infinity> Eventually we might do, certainly don't right now.
[05:13] <BenC> lamont: please use the files in debian/commit-templates/ in the future
[05:14] <BenC> lamont: like: git-commit -s -F debian/commit-templates/patch -e
[05:14] <lamont> BenC: ok.  sorry about that
[05:14] <BenC> lamont: makes our changelog auto-fill work better
[05:14] <BenC> np
[05:29] <BenC> lamont, infinity: 2.6.22-9.21 uploaded with lpia (hope it works) and hppa pulled in
[05:29] <BenC> doko: ^^
[05:29] <doko> \o/
[05:32] <lamont> BenC: thanks
[05:33] <BenC> be warned, there's a good chance lpia wont build, since I have no way to test it
[05:34] <BenC> but I am pretty sure I got all the instrumentation in there
[05:34] <BenC> if it fails, I'll do another upload
[05:35] <infinity> Testing it is easy enough...
[05:36] <BenC> how do I force an lpia build?
[05:36] <BenC> maybe I could setup an lpia chroot on my x86_64 box
[05:36] <infinity> Yes, you can do that.
[05:36] <infinity> chinstrap:~adconrad/chroot-ubuntu-gutsy-lpia.tar.bz2
[05:36] <infinity> Let me give you a sources.list that works a bit better than the one in there. :)
[05:37] <infinity> chinstrap:~adconrad/sources.list.lpia
[05:37] <infinity> Untar (A), spice with a little (B), toss your resolv.conf in, chroot in, and have fun.
[05:38] <infinity> And don't unhold the packages that are on hold, or you're in for a world of hurt.
[05:38] <infinity> (The apt build in there is a fancy one that pulls multiple architectures at once)
[05:41] <BenC> infinity: thanks
[07:13] <joejaxx> BenC: is linux-image-2.6.22-9-xen an intentional depend of linux-restricted-modiles-2.6.22-9-rt?
[07:13] <infinity> BenC: Failed.
[07:13] <infinity> BenC: make: *** No rule to make target `debian/rules.d/i686.mk'.  Stop.
[07:13] <infinity> BenC: I assume that chroot I gave you will help shed some light. :)
[07:14] <joejaxx> s/modiles/modules/g
[07:37] <BenC> infinity: that comes from dpkg-architecture
[07:37] <BenC> joejaxx: no, mistake, and I'll have it fixed soon
[07:37] <joejaxx> BenC: oh alright
[07:39] <BenC> infinity: doh, I use DEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU for that, guess it should be just DEB_HOST_ARCH?
[07:40] <BenC> infinity: will upload a fix in a bit
[07:48] <lamont`> BenC: hppa's abi files should just rename over I expect...
[07:48] <lamont`> BenC: what's the best way for me to get the new abi files from a build back to the tree?
[07:48] <lamont`> (the target is mid august for getting hppa live in the DC)
[08:17] <doko> BenC: DEB_HOST_ARCH stays fixed, DEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU may change
[08:29] <doko> BenC: could you make the binary linux-libc-dev package available somewhere?
[10:22] <BenC> doko: will get another upload shortly
[11:03] <bdmurray> BenC: I resumed from Hibernate and my caps lock button is blinking and I seem to have a kernel oops message in dmesg.  What would be useful to gather?
[11:12] <kylem> bdmurray, hmm. same here, but sans oops.
[11:13] <bdmurray> I've captured dmesg at least but was wondering if there was anything else worth grabbing.
[11:15] <bdmurray> kylem: I'm missing a cpu too
[11:15] <kylem> the cpus are hotplugged, so if something has died on the way back up, that's perfectly plausible.
[11:15] <bradley> if you are looking to file a bug report, start here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeamBugPolicies
[11:16] <bdmurray> thanks bradley
[11:18] <bradley> no problem, for the second output command, you may have to shorten it to cat /proc/version...i don't have a /proc/version_signature file
[11:18] <BenC> bdmurray: lol, you're getting schooled on filing a bug :)
[11:19] <kylem> bdmurray is our QA department, i imagine he knows this already.
[11:19] <bdmurray> bradley: you should have /proc/version_signature what kernel are you running?
[11:19] <JanC> now bradley is oops'ing  ;)
[11:19] <BenC> bdmurray: version_signature in gutsy didn't show up until this week with the -9 kernel
[11:19] <bdmurray> Come on now. He was trying to help.
[11:19] <bradley> lol...sorry guy, i was just here to ask a question and saw his, so i thought id answer it :)
[11:19] <JanC> of course he was
[11:20] <BenC> bradley: it's no problem, we like help...It just gave me a good laugh :)
[11:20] <bradley> bdmurray: im running the latest gutsy kernel
[11:21] <bdmurray> really? it sounds like you should have version_signature then.
[11:21] <BenC> bradley: if you have the latest, you should have it
[11:21] <bradley> i did the outputs a few days ago and didnt have version_signature
[11:21] <bradley> got and error when I tried to putput it
[11:21] <kylem> it's back in -9.
[11:22] <bradley> i was using -8 when i did the ouputs for my bug, so that would explain it
[11:22] <bdmurray> bradley: You said you had a question though?
[11:23] <bradley> yeah, um, it's about a bug report I filed.  I know you guys are super busy and all that, but I have a feeling the fix could be very simple and it doesn't seem as though it's been looked at.
[11:24] <bdmurray> what bug number is it?
[11:24] <bradley> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.22/+bug/126140
[11:25] <bradley> hasn't been looked at by anyone that could fix it, I should say
[11:28] <bradley> For the time being, I've created a simple , one-line script that runs and shut down, just before the halt script is invoked.  All it does is remove the module.
[11:30] <bdmurray> bradley: the output of 'sudo dmidecode' may be helpful too
[11:31] <bdmurray> bradley: and is your BIOS up to date?
[11:35] <bradley> ok, i added the dmidecode log.  As far as BIOS goes, I'm at v1.40 right now.  1.70 works but I downgraded on an unrelated problem.  BIOS V.1.80 and 2.00 mess with my system to the point that i cant login
[11:35] <bradley> i had this bug with v1.70
[11:36] <bradley> 1.80 and 2.00 are BIOS updates for Vista and aren't friendly toward Ubuntu
[11:37] <JanC> heh?
[11:37] <bdmurray> that's interesting
[11:39] <bradley> JanC: sorry if that didn't make sense, I have a tendency to ramblew
[11:40] <JanC> I was just wondering why & how they would block Ubuntu?
[11:40] <IntuitiveNipple> bradley:  can you add the output of " cat /proc/asound/card0/codec#0"
[11:41] <bradley> to be honest, I dont know what the problem is.  all i know is that when i tried to boot with the 1.8 and 2.0 BIOS, i would get to the gnome-splash and everything locks up
[11:41] <holycow> hi guys
[11:42] <holycow> does anyone know if the intel g33 chipset is supported?
[11:42] <holycow> either in feisty or dapper?
[11:43] <bradley> IN: i added your requested output
[11:44] <IntuitiveNipple> thanks
[11:47] <allee> should be bug 129130 assigned to linux-source or debian-installer or ???
[11:48] <bdmurray> dyslexia strikes again
[11:48] <bdmurray> 129310 is about something totally different
[11:50] <bdmurray> allee: the two systems in that bug seem quite different
[11:50] <bdmurray> allee: but to answer your question linux-source-2.6.22 would be the right package for that bug
[11:51] <allee> bdmurray: thx.  Yeah, different.  but identical error output ;)
[11:52] <bdmurray> allee: the same symptoms, identical error output, can be due to vastly different reasons.
[11:53] <IntuitiveNipple> bradley: Can you test something for me whilst your here?
[11:53] <bradley> certainly
[11:53] <allee> bdmurray: yeah, but I've no idea how to provide more useful output.  I'm working my way the KernelTeamBugPolicies. 
[11:53] <IntuitiveNipple> I just Googled your problem and found a potential solution, depending on what the cause is.
[11:54] <IntuitiveNipple> bradley: Switch to a tty console (using Ctrl+Alt+F1), login, then close down Gnome, then shutdown
[11:54] <bdmurray> allee: You can get a BusyBox prompt for a ton of different reasons and that is why a separate bug report would be a good idea.
[11:55] <IntuitiveNipple> so you'd do "sudo /etc/init.d/gdm stop" then "sudo shutdown -h now"
[11:55] <allee> bdmurray: k, as soon as I find some useful output, other then 'can't allocate tty' I create a new one
[11:56] <JanC> holycow: AFAIK the G33 hit the market after the Feisty release...
[11:56] <bdmurray> allee: cool, do you have any other distro on it?
[11:57] <bradley> IN: OK, I'll be back shortly to give you the results
[11:57] <allee> bdmurray: only the preinstalled Vista from DELL.
[11:58] <allee> bdmurray: ahhhh: access bejond end of device!
[12:02] <bradley> IN: following you instructions, my laptop shutdown just fine.
[12:03] <IntuitiveNipple> Great! I saw a Google post over at Fedora saying it might be an X issue
[12:03] <IntuitiveNipple> It looks like it is, so can you add the xorg package to the 'affects' list ?
[12:04] <IntuitiveNipple> So, what we can work out for you is an additional shutdown script that unloads snd_hda_intel as a workaround
[12:05] <bradley> i already have a workaround script that shuts things down just by removing that module
[12:06] <bradley> and sorry, how do I add to the affects list?
[12:07] <bradley> i see affects upstream and affects distrobution
[12:10] <IntuitiveNipple> I've done it for you :)
[12:10] <IntuitiveNipple> You use the Add Distribution button, select Ubuntu, then the package
[12:12] <bradley> i got an error message saying this bug has already been reported on xorg
[12:13] <IntuitiveNipple> yeah... I must have beat you to it :)
[12:13] <bradley> ok, nevermind, it's there
[12:13] <bradley> lol
[12:13] <IntuitiveNipple> Can you add your script workaround instructions to help others and the developers zero in on it, please?
[12:14] <IntuitiveNipple> I've recently been doing a lot of work with snd-hda-intel and ACPI, so I was pretty sure it isn't an ACPI issue. I suspect it'll turn out to be an alsa issue when someone who knows about that side of things looks at it.
[12:16] <bdmurray> IntuitiveNipple: I think the Xorg bug is a bit hasty
[12:19] <bdmurray> Couldn't it be gnome or a component of it?