[04:18] <mpt> "Results 1 - 10 of about 64,900 for allintext:ubuntu gusty. (0.14 seconds)"
[04:19] <mpt> That's 4% of the pages that refer to Ubuntu Gutsy at all
[04:19] <mpt> wow
[04:21] <mpt> "Fiesty" is just over 3% of Ubuntu Feisty references
[04:21] <mpt> I wonder if the error rate increases or decreases over the release cycle
[11:52] <tepsipakki> cjwatson: patching debconf on dapper makes it reject parts of the patch
[11:57] <tepsipakki> only the first hunk applied
[11:57] <tepsipakki> oh wait
[11:57] <tepsipakki> duh
[11:57] <tepsipakki> wrong debconf :I
[12:00] <cjwatson> wrong in which way?
[12:00] <tepsipakki> version ;)
[12:00] <cjwatson> heh
[12:00] <tepsipakki> I had deb-src line for feisty..
[12:01] <tepsipakki> too bad apt-get can't fetch the version I'd like if it's a source package
[12:01] <cjwatson> media-change handling was added to debconf-apt-progress after edgy
[12:01] <cjwatson> err
[12:01] <cjwatson> you're not installing feisty's debconf directly on dapper, are you?
[12:01] <tepsipakki> no, the deb-src was there for development
[12:07] <tepsipakki> hmm, I can of course build a new debconf package and put it on our repo, that way it should be a lot easier to test
[12:07] <cjwatson> tepsipakki: I can just give you the ones I built
[12:07] <tepsipakki> cjwatson: yeah, that works too :)
[12:08] <tepsipakki> I haven't seen that bug with feisty, so dapper is enough
[12:10] <cjwatson> http://people.ubuntu.com/~cjwatson/debconf-bug62986/
[12:10] <tepsipakki> thanks, I'll try them out
[03:28] <tepsipakki> cjwatson: I've tried dapper-netboot on one machine three times now, and haven't been able to reproduce the hang, but this is without the fix.. I'll leave it looping, so maybe we'll hit the bug eventually ;)
[03:41] <cjwatson> tepsipakki: ok, thanks
[03:41] <tepsipakki> cjwatson: do you want me to test with the fix anyway?
[03:42] <cjwatson> yes please, would be useful to know that it hasn't regressed previously working systems
[03:42] <tepsipakki> ok I'll test that too
[07:46] <cjwatson> evand: bug 127365 got the information you asked for, but it looks rejectable - stuff like:
[07:46] <cjwatson> Aug  2 04:50:24 ubuntu kernel: [  735.750836]  SQUASHFS error: sb_bread failed reading block 0x282b
[07:46] <cjwatson> near the end
[07:46] <cjwatson> well, either reject, or reassign it over to linux-source-2.6.22 and remove the milestone
[07:46] <cjwatson> possibly the latter if you ping pkl to let him know
[07:47] <evand> will do, thanks
[10:00] <superm1> what would you guys think about adding an option in that last advanced dialog to not configure the bootloader if checked to resolve this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/130445 ?
[10:05] <cjwatson> I'm fine with a "don't install grub" checkbox in the advanced dialog
[10:05] <cjwatson> it should cause the grub device entry that's already there to be greyed out
[10:05] <superm1> great :).  I'll work out a patch this week for that then
[10:05] <superm1> Ok. should be easy enough