[12:12] <Yahooadam> time to reboot
[12:13] <Yahooadam> cross your fingers :(
[12:17] <lamont> kraut: feisty is a stable and fully supported release.  The fact that dapper will have support on servers after gutsy+1 is gone is a different factor....
[12:23] <yahooadam> grub error 14 that time :(
[12:24] <yahooadam> or 15
[12:24] <yahooadam> should have written it down
[12:24] <yahooadam> 14 is filesystem compatibility error
[12:24] <yahooadam> and 15 is file not found
[12:26] <yahooadam> mounted hda1 and all thats there is "lost+found"
[12:26] <yahooadam> yet gparted says 600mb is used
[12:36] <yahooadam> sigh
[12:36] <yahooadam> looks like an ubuntu reinstall
[12:39] <ScottK> yahooadam: One thing to consider...
[12:40] <ScottK> Generally on Feisty, disks (and other devices) are tracked by UUID and not by traditional names.
[12:40] <yahooadam> yeah scot ?
[12:40] <ScottK> I'm not sure how you ended up with out that.
[12:40] <yahooadam> how do you work out the UUID ?
[12:41] <ScottK> If you have multiple drives, using the UUID keeps it so the right drive is always booted.
[12:41] <ScottK> The installer should do it for you.
[12:41] <yahooadam> ah
[12:41] <ScottK> If it doesn't, you can look in /dev/device-by-uuid, I think
[12:41] <yahooadam> well i hadnt touched the ubuntu config
[12:41] <yahooadam> so it may well have been using UUID
[12:42] <yahooadam> but i always rememberd it as hda1 :p
[12:42] <ScottK> It's in /dev/disk/by-uuid
[12:42] <yahooadam> kk, but as the disk was corrupt couldnt exactly see that :p
[12:43] <ScottK> If you are having problems getting the boot drive recognized, you can look there and check to make sure it's the same as in your /boot/grub/menu.lst.
[12:43] <ScottK> Right.
[12:43] <ScottK> Not the problem you were having this time, but 
[12:43] <ScottK> ...
[12:43] <yahooadam> kk
[12:43] <ScottK> an oddity of what you were describing to be aware of for the future.
[12:43] <yahooadam> kk :)
[12:44] <yahooadam> is there any way to recover my data ?
[12:44] <yahooadam> (atleast that drive was only hosting ubuntu itself, i would have been pissed if i had lost a data drive)
[12:51] <yahooadam> right well thx for the help anyway
[12:52] <yahooadam> l8trs
[01:17] <duaneb> hello?
[01:17] <duaneb> I'm completely new to this server stuff
[01:18] <duaneb> I followed the instructions given on https://help.ubuntu.com/community/RubyOnRails , but how can I get to it? :P
[01:18] <duaneb> the scripts/server works excellently
[01:28] <nealmcb> A server of mine is running into spam problems, e.g. being listed as dhcp incorrectly at dhcp.tqmcube.com  I want to mine our mail.log files (postfix) to look for more outgoing mail bounces and problems.  Is there a nice log parsing program to help me with this?  awstats gives some info, but not much about error messages
[01:28] <nealmcb> duaneb: we need specifics.  see the Seriously good guide to asking questions on IRC: http://www.sabi.co.uk/Notes/linuxHelpAsk.html
[01:28] <duaneb> nealmcb: I gave you specifics
[01:29] <nealmcb> "get to it" - what do you mean?
[01:29] <duaneb> I followed the EXACT guide on the link I provided
[01:29] <duaneb> ahh
[01:29] <duaneb> My root is showing as the default apache page
[01:29] <nealmcb> what did you say and what did it say that was unexpected and why did you think so
[01:31] <duaneb> nealmcb: thanks, but I got it working with an alias :)
[01:31] <nealmcb> which options did you choose in that howto?
[01:31] <duaneb> ahh
[01:31] <nealmcb> duaneb: ahh - good!
[01:44] <frederific> I have just upgraded my webserver (only running a few pages within my house) to feisty. I need to change the default gateway. I used to do this by editing /etc/interfaces, now that file no longer exists, how do I do it?
[01:55] <nealmcb> frederific: /etc/network/interfaces
[01:55] <frederific> nealmcb: ah, thanks a lot :)
[01:55] <nealmcb> :-)
[01:56] <frederific> it was always that, wasn't it? and I'm just too dense to have noticed...
[01:56] <nealmcb> I think so....
[01:56] <nealmcb> (not that you're dense :-)
[01:56] <frederific> :P
[02:54] <hiroshiX> yay, I got the iscsi to work in linux
[07:57] <jbrouhard> Anyone here ever work with HP LPr Servers?
[08:09] <jbrouhard> hey PanzerMKZ
[08:57] <kraut> moin
[11:01] <CrummyGummy> nealmcb, Sure, got an input?
[11:56] <enseven> Hi! I have got an Ubuntu Server, that sees 1 Volume over two fibre channel paths, e.g. /dev/sdd and /dev/sde. With multipath-tools I can create a device in /dev/mapper that uses both paths. Generally there is the possibility to set priorities. At the moment priorities are the same, and the first path found is used. But it varies which is found first. I would like to set different priorities to configure which path should be prefered
[11:56] <enseven> . Does anyone know how to do this? See http://paste.uni.cc/16917
[12:42] <fabbione> hey Christian
[12:43] <fabbione> enseven: no i don't recall how to do it off hands.. but there is a long example config file in /usr/share...
[12:43] <fabbione> enseven: with all the explanation
[12:43] <fabbione> anyway i am back to enjoy my last day of holidays
[01:04] <enseven> fabbione: That's why I wonder to meet you in the chat. You should really enjoy your holidays!
[01:07] <enseven> fabbione: I read the /usr/share/doc/multipath-tools/examples/multipath.conf.annotated.gz. There is a "prio_callout" option. It is to call a script to determine the priority. But there is no information about the script, how it works and no example.
[01:43] <chandu_> Hi
[01:57] <enseven> chandu_: Hi
[01:59] <chandu_> enseven, While booting , I am getting this erro
[01:59] <chandu_> enseven,  ata2: port is slow to respond 
[02:00] <enseven> For those who joined during the last hour again my question: I have got an Ubuntu Server, that sees 1 Volume over two fibre channel paths, e.g. /dev/sdd and /dev/sde. With multipath-tools I can create a device in /dev/mapper that uses both paths. Generally there is the possibility to set priorities. At the moment priorities are the same, and the first path found is used. But it varies which is found first. I would like to set differ
[02:00] <enseven> ent priorities to configure which path should be prefered. Does anyone know how to do this? See http://paste.uni.cc/16917 . In  /usr/share/doc/multipath-tools/examples/multipath.conf.annotated.gz there is an option "prio_callout" that is to be used for this. But there is no description or example how to do this.
[02:00] <enseven> chandu_: So your are missing some disk drives?
[02:07] <dthacker> enseven: two controllers on the SAN?
[02:07] <chandu_> enseven, missing disk drives
[02:08] <dthacker> bbl
[06:08] <tck> question
[06:09] <tck> im using kernel 2.6.20-16
[06:09] <tck> and if i wanted to patch to the latest stable at kernel.org which is at 2.6.22.1
[06:10] <tck> I have to apply patche 2.6.21 before i apply 2.6.21.1 right ?
[06:10] <tck> s/patche/patch/
[06:10] <tck>  apply 2.6.22.1 right ?
[06:13] <gamble6x> I BELIEVE that to patch you have to go up through the versions yes.  Though I have never done it myself.  I've always simply just compiled/installed the latest kernel.
[06:16] <tck> well here's my confusement
[06:16] <tck> one surely doesn't have to start at 2.6.21.1 and then do 2.6.21.2
[06:16] <tck> which patch version of the 2.6.21 do i patch with?
[06:17] <tck> there's alot of patch released for 2.6.21.* http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/
[06:22] <gamble6x> again, this is only from what I've read, but you can patch based on the main updates.  so 2.6.19 to 2.6.20 to 2.6.21.2
[06:24] <gamble6x> but also remember that you're patching your source and then recompiling from that anyway.
[06:24] <tck> sure 
[06:25] <tck> there is no 2.6.21.0 so to speak only http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/patch-2.6.21.1.bz2
[06:25] <tck> i presume the first 2.6.21.* patch is suitable?
[06:26] <tck> excuse there is
[06:26] <tck> sorry
[06:26] <tck> http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/patch-2.6.21.bz2 ;)
[06:32] <lamont`> generally speaking, I've found it works better to just take my patches to the new kernel, rather than bringing the new kernel in patch form to my patches
[07:34] <dthacker> hello, in this package name: 1-38.11-7ubuntu6   Does 1.38.11 refer to the bacula version?
[07:35] <ScottK> Yes
[07:36] <ScottK> -7 is the Debian revision and ubuntu6 is the Ubuntu revisions to the Debian revision.
[07:38] <dthacker> thanks.  I see that bacula 2.03 is in universe for gutsy.  I also know that the project is about to release 2.20 this weekend.  Does Ubuntu wait for new Debian packages, or package the new version?
[07:45] <ScottK> It depends on if someone is motivated.
[07:51] <dthacker> ok thanks.
[08:14] <ivoks> mathiaz: ping
[08:16] <mathiaz> ivoks: yop
[08:16] <ivoks> i don't recall that i told you...
[08:17] <ivoks> but it is possible to create guided RAID setup
[08:17] <ivoks> there is .udeb in debian already
[08:17] <mathiaz> ivoks: excellent.
[08:17] <ivoks> i guess raid+lvm shouldn't be dificult then
[08:17] <ivoks> the bad news is that i have only GPRS connection here (i'm on a vacation)
[08:18] <mathiaz> ok. currently we don't even have RAID.
[08:18] <mathiaz> what about adding RAID for now ?
[08:18] <ivoks> i will test it, but it will take time
[08:19] <ivoks> cause i'm very limited with connection :)
[08:19] <mathiaz> ok. no problem.
[08:19] <ivoks> when is future freeze?
[08:19] <ivoks> opening web page would take ages :D
[08:20] <mathiaz> feature freeze is next week
[08:20] <mathiaz> on the 16th
[08:20] <ivoks> urgh...
[08:21] <mathiaz> So you said that for the raid setup, it's already in debian.
[08:21] <ivoks> i'll try at least do guided raid till then
[08:21] <ivoks> yes, for some time, but we didn't include it, and i don't know why
[08:21] <mathiaz> that means it may be easier to integrate.
[08:22] <mathiaz> ok. so let's try to get RAID before feature freeze.
[08:22] <ivoks> of course...
[08:22] <mathiaz> and get it tested for tribe-5.
[08:22] <mathiaz> once RAID is integrated, we can start to have a look at RAID+LVM.
[08:23] <ivoks> ok, you can count on me
[08:23] <mathiaz> ivoks: excellent. Thanks for your help !
[08:42] <foo> Can 500-1000 TIME_WAITs for mysql port cause a load between 2-3? RAM is fine (no swapping), CPU utilization is < 24%... I'm trying to narrow this down, only thing that looks strange is TIME_WAITs
[08:43] <foo> ivoks: ping
[08:47] <foo> :) I'm at linuxworld myself, but there seems to be a problem. /me checks to see if we use persistent connections for mysql
[11:55] <Innatech> Is ICH7 fakeraid supported on 7.04 server? The installer sees the physical disks instead of the mirror defined in the BIOS setup screen. 
[11:56] <ajmitch> I suspect it'd only be supported by dmraid
[11:57] <ajmitch> which is in universe
[11:57] <mathiaz> ajmitch: is universe supposed to be enabled by default on fresh server installs ?
[11:57] <ajmitch> no
[11:57] <mathiaz> hum... ok thks. Seems that it's the case with the tribe-4 isos.
[11:58] <ajmitch> at least I don't think it's a good idea, though I think universe was enabled by default for the desktop
[11:58] <mathiaz> ok. so bug 105511 has been fixed
[11:58] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 105511 in Ubuntu "Universe and Multiverse not enabled by default on the livecd" [Medium,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/105511
[11:59] <ajmitch> given my bandwidth limitations :)
[11:59] <Innatech> So, can I switch to TTY2 and apt-get install dmraid, and then re-scan the disks?
[12:00] <ajmitch> you could try it at least :)
[12:00] <Innatech> heh. yeah. I will. :) 
[12:07] <lionel> mathiaz: universe and multiverse is enabled by default in feisty (on a fresh server install)