[12:31] <ubotu> New bug: #57408 in xserver-xorg-video-ati (main) "[radeon]  enabling EXA results in black screen" [Undecided,Incomplete]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/57408
[12:36] <ubotu> New bug: #56273 in xserver-xorg-video-ati (main) "X extremely slow after resume on ATI mobility M4 with DRI (dup-of: 23513)" [Undecided,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/56273
[12:41] <ubotu> New bug: #55073 in xserver-xorg-video-ati (main) "Emacs window doesn't get redrawn when switching desktops" [Undecided,Incomplete]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/55073
[12:45] <ubotu> New bug: #130799 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.22 (restricted) "Gutsy nvidia-glx no gpu or API mismatch (dup-of: 106217)" [Undecided,Invalid]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/130799
[11:45] <tepsipakki> wow, we should be able to sync ati from experimental
[11:46] <tepsipakki> means dropping 105_fdo_att7409_bug5437.diff, which is a hacky patch just for some acer
[11:46] <tepsipakki> and upstream hates that patch
[01:11] <ubotu> New bug: #131276 in xorg-server (main) "X does not use preferred mode when connected to Samsung 225bw" [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/131276
[02:20] <ubotu> New bug: #127677 in xorg (main) "oversized fonts in compiz in gutsy on intel 945" [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/127677
[05:21] <bryce> tepsipakki: excellent
[06:14] <mvo> /home/egon/devel/compiz/compiz/src/display.c:2018: undefined reference to `XGetXCBConnection'
[06:14] <mvo>  ^--- I assume this is only availabe with a xcb enable xlib?
[06:40] <mvo> ^--- byce, tepsipakki ? any idea?
[06:50] <bryce> that sounds likely
[06:50] <bryce> here's my todo notes for xcb enablement:
[06:50] <bryce>    * libx11 with xcb reactivated
[06:50] <bryce>      - Problem is a static lib inside java
[06:50] <bryce>      - Current package in debian should patch java not to use
[06:50] <bryce>      - Needs a fix for
[06:50] <bryce>        https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11390
[06:50] <mvo> hrm, that is pretty bad is it makes it impossible currently to follow compiz
[06:50] <bryce>      - http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libX11/
[06:50] <ubotu> Freedesktop bug 11390 in Lib/Xlib "Locking hooks not called from software built against non-XCB Xlib without XTHREADS" [Blocker,Resolved: notourbug]  
[06:51] <mvo> bryce: how likely is that for gutsy? oh, and will we get the latest ati driver from experimental :) ? it contains some nice fixes for compiz
[06:52] <bryce> mvo, I can talk more about it with timo, however I had been planning on postponing it until gutsy+1 since I get the impression we'll need debian's involvement but I get the sense they won't be looking at it in the near term
[06:52] <bryce> yes, the ati driver should be here soon
[06:52] <mvo> I'm not adcoating that we need to enable it if it is a risk, its just unfortunate that compiz upstream is using it now and we are sort of excluded
[06:53] <bryce> tepsipakki said he'd upload it today.  Sounds like maybe we can just sync from debian
[06:53] <mvo> cool
[06:53] <bryce> I think it's going to be a moderately-high important task for gutsy+1
[06:53] <mvo> it seems that other distros (opensuse, fedora) ship with a xcb-xlib?
[06:53] <mvo> how do they manage?
[06:54] <jcristau> last i checked, fedora didn't use xlib-xcb
[06:54] <bryce> sorry, I'm being called to breakfast.  bbiab.
[06:54] <bryce> Btw, I put in the main inclusion request for displayconfig-gtk the other day :-)
[06:55] <bryce> I'm hoping it gets in soon, since that's a prereq for two specs
[06:57] <jcristau> oh, it does now
[06:57] <seb128> mvo: previous cycle when we had the xlib-xcb issues fedora was not using it, I've not looked recently though
[06:58] <jcristau> %changelog
[06:58] <jcristau> * Mon Jul 23 2007 Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com> 1.1.2-1
[06:58] <jcristau> - libX11 1.1.2.
[06:58] <jcristau> - Enable XCB for libX11 transport.
[06:58] <mvo> bryce: rock!
[06:58] <mvo> jcristau: thanks
[06:59] <mvo> seb128: right, as I said, I'm not advocating to enable it (yet ;) - just getting a picture of it
[07:00] <seb128> mvo: do we still want to track compiz git at this point? we are not too far from UVF now, and they just rolled a new stable, might make sense to just use it?
[07:00] <jcristau> i don't know when java is going to be fixed...
[07:01] <mvo> seb128: its a stable unstable ("Compiz 0.5 is the developmental version")
[07:01] <seb128> on an other hand we should better push those change this cycle that next one if they need some adjustments
[07:01] <mvo> seb128: currently we do not have any option, we need to stop tracking it
[07:17] <bryce> back