/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2007/08/23/#launchpad.txt

=== Pricey [n=pricechi@ubuntu/member/pdpc.supporter.student.PriceChild] has joined #launchpad
=== mthaddon [n=mthaddon@canonical/launchpad/mthaddon] has joined #launchpad
=== Mez [n=Mez@ubuntu/member/mez] has joined #launchpad
=== doko_ [n=doko@dslb-088-073-104-209.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #launchpad
=== jml [n=jml@ppp121-44-219-182.lns1.hba1.internode.on.net] has joined #launchpad
=== Kmos_ [n=gothicx@249-164.dial.nortenet.pt] has joined #launchpad
=== tonyyarusso [n=anthony@ubuntu/member/tonyyarusso] has joined #launchpad
=== Mez [n=Mez@ubuntu/member/mez] has joined #launchpad
=== Kmos_ is now known as Kmos
=== spiv [n=andrew@86.228.233.220.exetel.com.au] has joined #launchpad
=== helix84 [n=a@adsl-dyn107.91-127-42.t-com.sk] has joined #launchpad
=== Mez [n=Mez@ubuntu/member/mez] has joined #launchpad
=== superm1 [n=superm1@ubuntu/member/superm1] has joined #launchpad
=== merriam [n=merriam@82-133-115-120.dyn.gotadsl.co.uk] has joined #launchpad
=== gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #launchpad
=== Mez [n=Mez@ubuntu/member/mez] has joined #launchpad
=== kiko-afk is now known as kiko
=== Mez [n=Mez@ubuntu/member/mez] has joined #launchpad
=== kiko is now known as kiko-zzz
=== jml [n=jml@ppp108-61.static.internode.on.net] has joined #launchpad
=== Mez [n=Mez@ubuntu/member/mez] has joined #launchpad
=== Mez [n=Mez@ubuntu/member/mez] has joined #launchpad
=== tck [n=tck@213-202-140-94.bas502.dsl.esat.net] has joined #launchpad
=== tck [n=tck@213-202-140-94.bas502.dsl.esat.net] has joined #launchpad
=== effie_jayx [n=valles@ubuntu/member/effie-jayx] has joined #launchpad
=== stub [n=stub@ppp-58.8.5.12.revip2.asianet.co.th] has joined #launchpad
ubotuNew bug: #134189 in launchpad-bazaar "Heading consistency for code.lp.net/project" [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/13418905:50
=== spiv [n=andrew@canonical/launchpad/spiv] has joined #launchpad
=== Prognatus_ [n=irc@201.80-202-51.nextgentel.com] has joined #launchpad
mthaddonLaunchpad is going down in 15 mins for a code update. Estimated downtime is approx 60mins.06:49
fabbionemthaddon: good luck06:54
=== superm1_ [n=superm1@ubuntu/member/superm1] has joined #launchpad
mthaddonthx fabbione :)06:54
=== Amaranth [n=travis@ubuntu/member/Amaranth] has joined #launchpad
=== LaserJock [n=mantha@ubuntu/member/laserjock] has joined #launchpad
=== LaserJock hugs #launchpad
=== caravena [n=caravena@pc-84-203-83-200.cm.vtr.net] has joined #launchpad
=== fabbione [i=fabbione@gordian.fabbione.net] has joined #launchpad
jameshnow your portlets should stay open if appropriate08:14
=== neversfelde|mobi [n=neversfe@82.113.106.1] has joined #launchpad
=== caravena_ [n=caravena@pc-84-203-83-200.cm.vtr.net] has joined #launchpad
=== caravena_ is now known as caravena
=== zahris [n=zahris@167.205.79.100] has joined #launchpad
=== zahris [n=zahris@167.205.79.100] has left #launchpad []
=== allenap [n=allenap@212.233.37.68] has joined #launchpad
=== superm1 [n=superm1@ubuntu/member/superm1] has joined #launchpad
superm1the new upload URL for PPAs is going to be ppa.launchpad.net, correct?08:58
mdkedoes a subteam have permissions to push to a branch owned by a team?08:59
spivmdke: yes, they should.09:00
spivmdke: or rather, anyone that is a member of a team can push to branches owned by that team.09:00
spivmdke: it doesn't matter if they are a member indirectly through another team, or directly in that team.09:00
mdkespiv: thanks09:00
spivThe only part of Launchpad that should distinguish between indirect and direct team members is the team membership admin pages, iirc.09:01
mdkeok, so same applies to bugmail etc09:02
spivRight.09:02
mdkecheers09:03
=== carlos [n=carlos@canonical/launchpad/carlos] has joined #launchpad
carlosmorning09:19
superm1mornin09:20
=== mpt [n=mpt@121-72-138-60.dsl.telstraclear.net] has joined #launchpad
=== Amaranth [n=travis@ubuntu/member/Amaranth] has joined #launchpad
Amaranthi'm supposed to use ppa.launchpad.net for my PPA, right?09:41
Amaranthin dput, i mean09:41
superm1Amaranth, i think so, but it's not working for me yet09:44
Amaranthsuperm1: yeah, that's what i was wondering09:47
superm1Amaranth, the mail that went out yesterday indicated that it wasn't upload.launchpad.net, that it should be ppa.launchpad.net at least09:48
superm1i might just stop waiting around and just try the PPA tomorrow09:48
Amaranthyeah09:48
superm1Amaranth, in doing an nmap on it, it looks like they have a firewall up atm on port 21, hence why we can't ftp stuff in with dput yet09:52
Amaranthheh09:53
superm1alright bed time for me, i'll have fun with the PPA tomorrow. nn09:53
=== gmb [n=gmb@i-83-67-5-113.freedom2surf.net] has joined #launchpad
=== intellectronica [n=intellec@host86-140-40-56.range86-140.btcentralplus.com] has joined #launchpad
=== mrevell [n=matthew@canonical/launchpad/mrevell] has joined #launchpad
=== jml [n=jml@ppp121-44-219-182.lns1.hba1.internode.on.net] has joined #launchpad
=== bigjools [n=ed@canonical/launchpad/bigjools] has joined #launchpad
=== doko_ is now known as doko
=== Ek0nomik [n=Edelweis@75.128.244.253] has joined #launchpad
Ek0nomikyo.10:33
=== danilos [n=danilo@adsl-236-193.eunet.yu] has joined #launchpad
Ek0nomikWould anyone be able to help me sign the code of conduct?  I keep entering what was given to me in the *.asc file, but I get this error:10:34
Ek0nomikPlease fix the problems below and try again.10:34
Ek0nomik(7, 9, 'No public key')10:34
Ek0nomikbut, my key is already on the server:  http://keyserver.ubuntu.com:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x6C77D4B1&op=index10:35
=== Mez [n=Mez@ubuntu/member/mez] has joined #launchpad
=== jml [n=jml@ppp121-44-219-182.lns1.hba1.internode.on.net] has joined #launchpad
=== intellectronic1 [n=intellec@host81-153-175-237.range81-153.btcentralplus.com] has joined #launchpad
=== tonyyarusso [n=anthony@ubuntu/member/tonyyarusso] has joined #launchpad
=== intellectronic1 [n=intellec@host81-153-175-237.range81-153.btcentralplus.com] has left #launchpad []
=== norsetto [n=norsetto@host225-159-dynamic.57-82-r.retail.telecomitalia.it] has joined #launchpad
norsettomorning gents11:09
=== helix84 [n=a@adsl-dyn107.91-127-42.t-com.sk] has joined #launchpad
norsettoI'm quite keen to use the PPA, but it seems like I'm stuck since a couple of days waiting approval for the launchpad beta team?11:10
=== ddaa [n=david@canonical/launchpad/ddaa] has joined #launchpad
=== coNP [n=conp@unaffiliated/conp] has joined #launchpad
=== norsetto bows in front of the new master of the know and unknown universe
=== ..[topic/#launchpad:mrevell] : Launchpad - https://launchpad.net/ | Current version: 1.1.8 | Next developer meeting: Thu 23 Aug 2007, 1400UTC (wiki:MeetingAgenda) | launchpad-users@lists.canonical.com (wiki:MailingLists) | Launchpad help: https://help.launchpad.net | Channel logs: http://tinyurl.com/72w39
mrevellnorsetto: Hi11:20
mrevellnorsetto: Sorry for the delay in replying to your message above.11:20
mrevellnorsetto: I'm the person on the Launchpad team who helps people join the PPA beta.11:20
norsettomrevell: np, take all the time it takes11:21
=== coNP [n=conp@unaffiliated/conp] has joined #launchpad
mrevellnorsetto: I haven't approved anyone this week because we're about to move the PPA beta to the main Launchpad site, from our "dogfood" sandbox environment.11:22
norsettomrevell: right11:22
mrevellnorsetto: What's your Launchpad user name?11:22
norsettonorsetto :-)11:22
mrevellnorsetto: Cool, just wanted to check :)11:23
=== asisak [n=conp@unaffiliated/conp] has joined #launchpad
=== asisak is now known as coNP
coNPAre you really sure on that interface change of the bug pages? The "overview" tab is still there for what now the package name is meant. On the other hand we have lost the colors of importance and status :(. Furthermore experienced users are punished now with lots of mis-click( possibilitie)s. This is only my opinion, of course. :)11:24
=== intellectronic1 [n=intellec@host81-153-175-237.range81-153.btcentralplus.com] has joined #launchpad
mrevellnorsetto: I've just checked your account on dogfood. (https://dogfood.launchpad.net/~norsetto) You're ready to join the PPA beta. So, I need to add you to the Launchpad Beta Testers team both on dogfood and production.11:25
mrevellnorsetto: Done.11:26
=== Gwaihir [n=Gwaihir@ubuntu/member/gwaihir] has joined #launchpad
mrevellnorsetto: Okay, you can go ahead and set up your PPA now. Here's the quick-start guide:11:26
norsettomrevell: thanks a bunch!11:26
mrevellnorsetto: https://help.launchpad.net/PPAQuickStart11:26
norsettomrevell: really appreciate this11:27
mrevellnorsetto: One thing, though: when we move the PPA beta from our dogfood server to the main Launchpad environment, you'll have to re-upload your packages. However, the change may not happen until after the weekend.11:27
mrevellnorsetto: No problem :)11:27
norsettomrevell: np, will keep that in mind11:27
mrevellnorsetto: I'm sorry I didn't reply to explain why there'd be a delay in approving you. This week has been particularly busy, preparing for our 1.1.8 release.11:27
norsettomrevell: hey, no need to explain11:28
=== rulus [n=rulus_|@d54C1A033.access.telenet.be] has joined #launchpad
norsettomrevell: you guys are doing an excellent work :-)11:28
mrevellnorsetto: Thanks for joining the PPA beta. Any feedback you can offer will be really useful.11:29
=== rulus [n=rulus_|@d54C1A033.access.telenet.be] has left #launchpad ["Ex-Chat"]
=== neversfelde|mobi [n=neversfe@82.113.121.1] has joined #launchpad
ubotuNew bug: #134220 in malone "the new layout has no informations about the current version" [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/13422011:40
gnomefreakim gonna guess and say the oops i get when trying to view my branches is known?11:41
Odd_BlokeI have a branch at https://code.launchpad.net/~daniel-thewatkins/bzr/fix-for-124853 which I get an oops (OOPS-600E1094) when I try to access via the web.  I have yet to upload to it without interruption (which is probably causing the problem) and need to rid myself of it anyways.  Could someone just get rid of it?11:49
ubotuhttps://devpad.canonical.com/~jamesh/oops.cgi/600E109411:49
mwhudsonit works for me11:54
mwhudsonah11:54
mwhudsonohfuck11:55
Odd_Blokemwhudson: Was that 'ohfuck' related to this?12:00
mwhudsonyes12:00
mwhudsonwe did a rollout this morning, seems it has a bug12:00
=== Mez [n=Mez@ubuntu/member/mez] has joined #launchpad
=== jtv [n=jtv@ppp-58.8.70.165.revip2.asianet.co.th] has joined #launchpad
norsettosilly question: apparently my ppa is already in production (not dogfood). What fqdn can I use to upload?12:04
carlosnorsetto: ppa.launchpad.net12:06
norsettocarlos: cool, thanks :-[12:06
mwhudsonOdd_Bloke: i think you have a 20% chance of that page not oopsing12:07
mwhudsonOdd_Bloke: it depends which app server  you get :/12:07
norsettooh well: Uploading to ppa (via ftp to ppa.launchpad.net):12:08
norsettoConnection failed, aborting. Check your network (111, 'Connection refused')12:08
Odd_Blokemwhudson: Ah, that sounds nasty.  I've got through and done my thing now though, thanks.12:08
mwhudsoncool12:08
mrevellnorsetto: hi12:09
norsettomrevell: I'm giving trouble as usual :-)12:09
mrevellnorsetto: :) What makes you say your ppa is already in production?12:09
ubotuNew bug: #134223 in launchpad-bazaar "viewing the index page of a bug you can upload to oopses" [Critical,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/13422312:10
norsettomrevell: it is not in: https://dogfood.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+ppas but  it is in: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+ppas12:10
norsettomrevell: I can indeed dput in dogfood but then I don't see anything in the PPA (nor I receive any feedback)12:11
mrevellnorsetto: Ah, ok. For now, you still need to follow the instruction in the PPA quick-start guide - i.e. use the dogfood FQDN - as far as I know.12:12
mrevellnorsetto: Oh, right.12:12
mrevellnorsetto: Hmm, if you could wait a couple of hours, I'll be able to get a definitive answer on what you need to do.12:12
norsettomrevell: sure12:12
mrevellnorsetto: I need to speak to a colleague in Brazil. He hasn't started work yet, as it's still quite early there.12:13
norsettomrevell: those brazilians, always an excuse to not work ;-)12:13
=== Philip5 [n=Philip@c83-253-56-100.bredband.comhem.se] has joined #launchpad
=== meduxa [i=agustin@213.231.80.16.static.user.ono.com] has joined #launchpad
=== Spads [i=spacehob@unaffiliated/spads] has joined #launchpad
ubotuNew bug: #134230 in launchpad ""Home" menu broken at help.launchpad.net" [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/13423001:00
=== intellectronica [n=intellec@host86-140-40-229.range86-140.btcentralplus.com] has joined #launchpad
=== zwn1 [n=behnam@213.207.210.231] has joined #launchpad
mrevellnorsetto: when you say you couldn't see anything in your PPA, after uploading to the dogfood FQDN, did you mean you couldn't see anything in production, dogfood, or both?01:12
norsettomrevell: both01:12
mrevellnorsetto: right, thanks. It can take up to 20 minutes before your package is processed.01:13
=== gnomefre1k [n=gnomefre@adsl-144-142-136.rmo.bellsouth.net] has joined #launchpad
=== norsetto checking
norsettomrevell: nothing in production but the dogfood ppa disappeared01:16
mrevellnorsetto: disappeared?01:16
norsettomrevell: yeah, I don't see that anymore01:17
mrevellnorsetto: I'm on your dogfood profile page and no longer see a link to your PPA link. That's odd.01:18
mrevellnorsetto: Is there a link on your profile page to re-enable the PPA?01:18
norsettomrevell: yes01:18
norsettomrevell: should I proceed with that?01:19
gnomefreakok for some reason it looks like if i use ppa.launchpad.net uploads to ubuntu archives :01:20
mrevellnorsetto: Yes, please re-enable it.01:21
norsettomrevell: done01:21
mrevellnorsetto: Okay, I'm going to see what more information I can find out.01:22
=== tokj [n=tk@151.82.1.65] has joined #launchpad
norsettomrevell: I think this: http://ppa.dogfood.launchpad.net/<LP_NAME>/ in the quickstart is wrong? Should be https://dogfood.launchpad.net/~<LP_NAME>/+archive?01:25
norsettomrevell: no, I think thats just because I have no archives uploaded yet01:27
norsettomrevell: gotta go, wife is calling for lunch (those italians, always an excuse to not work...)01:29
mrevellnorsetto: Okay, talk to you layer :)01:30
mreveller, later01:30
=== kiko-zzz is now known as kiko-afk
gnomefreakmrevell: when i use pp.launchpad.net in dput.cf than i use dput file.source.changes it uploads it to ubuntu.com archive01:37
gnomefreakppa*01:37
gnomefreakoh and if i change ppa.launchpad.net to the dogfood link it fails to upload saying it has already been uploaded01:40
=== asisak [n=conp@unaffiliated/conp] has joined #launchpad
=== asisak is now known as coNP
mrevellgnomefreak: Hi01:48
gnomefreakmrevell: hi ;)01:48
mrevellgnomefreak: Thanks for preorting this.01:48
mreveller, reporting,I mean01:48
gnomefreakoh ok so i did it right oh good ok01:48
ubotuNew bug: #134243 in launchpad "When the person has no homepage description vertical spacing is weird" [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/13424301:50
gnomefreakoh and https://help.launchpad.net/PPAQuickStart needs to be changed to use stable/released information if it is out of beta01:50
mrevellgnomefreak: We're still in beta at the moment.01:51
gnomefreakthat could explain why ppa.lp.net didnt work but still it wont let me upload it again using dogfood link 01:51
bigjoolsgnomefreak: what is your LP ID?01:52
gnomefreakhttps://launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/01:52
mrevellgnomefreak: I'm going to email all PPA holders to explain that PPA is still in beta on dogfood, for the time being.01:52
gnomefreakmrevell: ok is there a way to kill the upload since it went to ubuntu.com and i got a rejecting email saying i cant upload to it (that is known since im not motu nor core01:53
mrevellgnomefreak: bigjools may be able to answer that01:53
gnomefreakbigjools: i trying to upload to mozillateam PPa not my own01:53
bigjoolsgnomefreak: aha, ok I am checking01:53
gnomefreakk ty01:54
bigjoolsgnomefreak: what package name?01:55
=== tck [n=tck@213-202-140-94.bas502.dsl.esat.net] has joined #launchpad
=== carlos [n=carlos@canonical/launchpad/carlos] has joined #launchpad
gnomefreaknspr01:58
gnomefreakhold on ill get full name01:58
bigjoolsok01:58
gnomefreaknspr-trunk_4.7.0~cvs20070713-0ubuntu1~mt1_source.changes01:58
gnomefreakim using this as a test becasue it takes all of 3 minutes to build ;)01:59
bigjoolsgnomefreak: I can't see any uploads for that package01:59
bigjoolscan you try again02:00
bigjoolsdid you get an email saying it had failed?02:00
gnomefreakeverytime i do it says its uploaded. it got uploaded to ubuntu.com not lp02:00
gnomefreakUpload package to host ubuntu02:00
gnomefreakAlready uploaded to upload.ubuntu.com02:00
Fujitsudput -f02:00
gnomefreakand yes i got a reject since im i dont have upload rights to ubuntu archives02:01
=== gmb is now known as gmb-afk
bigjoolswhat about PPA upload, did you get an email for that?02:01
gnomefreakbigjools: it never went to PPA it went to ubuntu,com02:01
gnomefreakUploading to ubuntu (via ftp to upload.ubuntu.com):02:01
gnomefreakwhen using ppa.lp.net in dput.cf02:02
bigjoolsAnd when you upload to dogfood, it rejects with an email?02:02
=== Hobbsee [n=Hobbsee@ubuntu/member/hobbsee] has joined #launchpad
gnomefreakno it rejects in terminal02:03
=== salgado [n=salgado@canonical/launchpad/salgado] has joined #launchpad
gnomefreakFujitsu: even with -f it tries to upload to ubuntu02:03
gnomefreakfqdn = upload.dogfood.launchpad.net  still uploads to ubuntu.com02:04
bigjoolsok let me check that02:04
Hobbseegnomefreak: sounds like you're calling it wrong02:04
gnomefreakwhy is this a separate dput file than the main one02:04
=== j^_ [n=j^@p54BED171.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #launchpad
gnomefreakHobbsee: what do you mean02:05
gnomefreakdput -f nspr-trunk_4.7.0~cvs20070713-0ubuntu1~mt1_source.changes02:05
Hobbseegnomefreak: if you're trying to upload to a ppa02:05
Hobbseegnomefreak: yes, you havent specified where to, and it dputs to ubuntu02:05
j^_i seem to get subscribed to bugs from a product automatically, how can i disabled that02:05
gnomefreakHobbsee: so dput -f ppa file?02:06
Hobbseegnomefreak: yes.02:07
gnomefreakk ill try it02:07
Hobbseegnomefreak: or whatever you've specified as in your dput.cf02:07
gnomefreakUploading to ppa (via ftp to upload.dogfood.launchpad.net)02:07
gnomefreakmuch better ty :)02:07
bigjoolssorted02:08
gnomefreakbigjools: yep sorry about that thank you for helping02:09
mrevellthanks for your help bigjools02:09
bigjoolsno problem!02:09
Hobbseegnomefreak: you can also set which is the default that you dput to, in your dput.cf02:10
=== matsubara [n=matsubar@canonical/launchpad/matsubara] has joined #launchpad
=== never|mobi [n=neversfe@82.113.121.1] has joined #launchpad
=== norsetto [n=norsetto@host115-2-dynamic.10-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it] has joined #launchpad
=== gmb-afk is now known as gmb
=== zwn1 is now known as zwnj
norsettomrevell: ok, little update, I have dput a package about an hour ago (to dogfood) and I still don't see it in dogfood (or production); 02:30
Hobbsee"oops, you broke it"02:30
=== norsetto hugs Hobbsee
mrevellnorsetto: Hmm.02:31
=== Hobbsee hugs norsetto
Hobbseehiya mrevell 02:31
mrevellhi Hobbsee02:31
norsettomrevell: and don't tell me you don't love me 'cause I won't believe you :-D02:32
mrevellnorsetto: hehe :)02:32
mrevellnorsetto: bigjools is at lunch at the moment. He may be able to give you detailed help when he returns. He's one of the developers close to PPA.02:33
Hobbseemrevell: you just dont want to admit you broke it, during a tribe release.02:33
=== carlos [n=carlos@canonical/launchpad/carlos] has joined #launchpad
norsettomrevell: I see what might be the problem, apparently only one gpg key was migrated to dogfood (of course the one I don't use anymore)02:39
mrevellnorsetto: Ah!02:40
=== parker13 [n=garry@205.143.79.181] has joined #launchpad
=== ddaa [n=david@canonical/launchpad/ddaa] has joined #launchpad
mrevellnorsetto: Now, that would explain it. I'm afraid that's something we can't fix until tomorrow, when my colleague cprov-out returns.02:40
norsettomrevell: and that was also deactivated :-/02:41
parker13Hi guys. I'm trying to upload to the new PPA server as per the "Quick Start Guide", but the FTP connection is refused to ppa.launchpad.net. Is there a problem at the moment?02:48
parker13/who02:55
=== intellectronica [n=intellec@host86-140-40-229.range86-140.btcentralplus.com] has joined #launchpad
ubotuNew bug: #134256 in launchpad-bazaar "codebrowse chokes when there is no commit message" [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/13425603:00
norsettoparker13: I just saw an email from mrevell explaining that03:03
gnomefreakparker13: try dput ppa(or whatever the name of the ppa is in dput.cf than the source.changes file03:03
mrevellparker13: hey03:04
mrevellparker13: You say you're following the quick-start guide. Have you used the upload.dogfood.launchpet.net address?03:04
gnomefreakor not i got a rejection email :(03:05
norsettolaunchpet :-) freaudian slip I guess ....03:05
mrevellha, yes :)03:06
parker13I've been following https://help.launchpad.net/PPAQuickStart03:06
parker13It just says to use ppa.launchpad.net03:06
mrevellparker13: I can't find ppa.launchpad.net in that guide. Could you tell me roughly where you can see that?03:07
gnomefreakmrevell: your email you sent out yesterday03:07
gnomefreakto lp mailing list03:07
mrevellgnomefreak: but parker13 says that ppa.launchpad.net is in the quick-start guide. I'm concerned, because I can't find that in the guide.03:08
parker13mrevell: Step 1: Edit ~/.dput.cf and add something like:03:08
mrevellgnomefreak: have you seen the email I sent today?03:08
gnomefreakmrevell: its not in the guide just your email03:08
gnomefreakmrevell: no03:08
parker13mrevell:  fqdn = ppa.launchpad.net 03:08
gnomefreakunless you sent me the rejection email 03:08
mrevellparker13: And that's on the guide right now? When I visit it, I see: 03:09
mrevell[my-ppa] 03:09
mrevellfqdn = upload.dogfood.launchpad.net03:09
mrevellincoming = ~<LP_NAME>/ubuntu/03:09
mrevelllogin = anonymous03:09
gnomefreakparker13: you saw that in the email not the guide afaik03:09
norsettomrevell: confirmed; thats what I see too03:09
parker13mrevell: I'm not on dogfood, I'm just on launchpad.net03:09
mrevellparker13: You still shouldn't see any mention of ppa.launchpad.net in the quick-start guide.03:10
bigjoolsmrevell: anyone need any help?03:10
mrevellgnomefreak: Take a look at the email i sent today ... PPA is still in dogfood for a while yet03:11
mrevellparker13: Have you ever had a PPA in dogfood?03:11
mrevellbigjools: I think norsetto had a problem earlier.03:11
gnomefreakmrevell: when i get it i will, right now im trying to figure out why it rejected it03:11
bigjoolsnorsetto: do you still have a problem?03:11
norsettobigjools: well, it seems that the gpg keys from my account were not migrated correctly to dogfood; I can change them manually of course, was wondering if I should do it03:12
parker13mrevell: Oops. I've had the page open since this morning and I've just refreshed it now. Sorry for the confusion. It now says "upload.dogfood.launchpad.net".03:13
bigjoolsnorsetto: yes, you should do that03:13
norsettobigjools: okki dokki, problem solved :-D03:14
bigjoolsnorsetto: did you get a rejection about GPG keys?03:14
norsettobigjools: no, I was unable to upload to my ppa03:14
mrevellgnomefreak: ah, no problem. Someone edited the page earlier today, in anticipation of the move to production, but it won't happen for a while yet, so I had to revert the changes straight away. That would explain the confusion :)03:15
gnomefreakah ok03:15
parker13mrevell: Thanks. Will anything we upload be 03:15
parker13mrevell: available on launchpad at the end of the beta?03:16
mrevellparker13: What's your Launchpad user name?03:16
parker13mrevell: parker13 :-)03:17
mrevellparker13: ok03:17
mrevellparker13:  let me check something03:17
gnomefreakok lets see if it works this time 03:18
mrevellparker13: Right. PPA is still only available in dogfood. Dogfood is separate testing environment for Launchpad. It uses a database snapshot of production Launchpad from back in June.03:19
mrevellparker13: Back then, you didn't have a gpg key in your Launchpad profile nor were you an Ubuntero.03:19
parker13mrevell: Yeah, that's why I left it until now to give it a try.03:19
mrevellparker13: Both of those are conditions for joining the PPA beta. You can usually overcome that, because my colleague cprov-out can move them over from your main account. He's out today, tho03:20
parker13parker13: OK, I'll leave it for now. Thanks. When's the new launch date?03:20
mrevellparker13: I'll send an email out to announce it but it should be next week.03:21
=== mrevell is now known as mrevell-afk
=== j^ [n=j^@e179004203.adsl.alicedsl.de] has joined #launchpad
=== zyga [n=zyga@ubuntu/member/zyga] has joined #launchpad
=== mrevell-afk is now known as mrevell
=== jkakar [n=jkakar@modemcable178.77-70-69.static.videotron.ca] has joined #launchpad
gnomefreakRejected:03:27
gnomefreakCould not find PPA for 'mozillateam'03:27
gnomefreakSigner has no upload rights at all to this distribution.03:27
gnomefreakwhy me03:27
Hobbseegnomefreak: because it hates you.03:27
gnomefreakim seeing this03:28
gnomefreakhttps://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/03:28
gnomefreakits right there03:28
gnomefreakwhy is this being a pain :(03:29
=== Rinchen [n=joey@canonical/launchpad/pdpc.supporter.professional.rinchen] has joined #launchpad
Hobbseewhat does your dput.cf say?03:29
gnomefreakincoming = ~mozillateam/ubuntu/03:29
Hobbseehiya Rinchen!03:29
Hobbseeright03:29
Rinchenhiya Hobbsee 03:30
Fujitsugnomefreak: Has mozillateam had its PPA activated?03:30
HobbseeRinchen: at some point, i'd like to pick your brains, with laserjock, if that's OK by you.03:30
gnomefreaki activated it now im trying to upload to it03:30
RinchenHobbsee, sure, pick away03:30
gnomefreakhttps://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive Fujitsu 03:30
HobbseeRinchen: mmm...brains...03:30
Fujitsugnomefreak: Erm, dogfood.03:31
Rinchenah, I love the smell of a LP release in the morning :-)03:31
gnomefreakFujitsu: it never had a dogfood account 03:31
Fujitsugnomefreak: Then you have a problem. It won't just magically work from production.03:31
Fujitsugnomefreak: Er, I see it there on dogfood... activate the PPA there and you should be OK.03:32
gnomefreakwhere is there?03:32
Fujitsugnomefreak: https://dogfood.launchpad.net/~mozillateam03:33
norsettobigjools: can you do something on your end? I've given the fingerprint but I'm not receiving any encrypted email03:33
=== mhb [n=mhb@ubuntu/member/mhb] has joined #launchpad
Fujitsunorsetto: I don't think you can add keys directly on dogfood.03:33
bigjoolswhat he said, sorry norsetto03:33
bigjoolsI jumped the gun a bit03:33
bigjoolsmrevell: can you get an admin to migrate his keys over to dogfood?03:34
mrevellbigjools: I'll mthaddon when arrives later. Alternatively, cprov-out can do it when he returns tomorrow.03:35
=== niemeyer [n=niemeyer@modemcable178.77-70-69.static.videotron.ca] has joined #launchpad
gnomefreakFujitsu: ok done ill try it again03:35
ubotuNew bug: #134269 in soyuz "IntegrityError activating PPA in a stale page" [Undecided,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/13426903:35
bigjoolsmrevell: ok thanks03:35
Fujitsugnomefreak: That should work.03:35
gnomefreakis it gonna show up in dogfood until it is released?03:36
Fujitsu`it'?03:36
gnomefreakthe upload03:36
FujitsuYou'll need to reupload it to production once production gets PPAs working.03:36
gnomefreakk03:37
=== sinzui [n=sinzui@pool-70-17-67-100.res.east.verizon.net] has joined #launchpad
Fujitsugnomefreak: Looks to be working.03:43
=== mthaddon [n=mthaddon@canonical/launchpad/mthaddon] has joined #launchpad
gnomefreakok cool ty03:47
gnomefreakwill it automaticly send it build or do i have to do something?03:48
ubotuNew bug: #134275 in rosetta "Missing download.png image in translation import queue" [Undecided,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/13427503:50
Fujitsugnomefreak: They're queued already.03:51
gnomefreakoh i couldnt see them thats why i asked03:51
gnomefreakah now i see them03:51
=== OgMaciel [n=omaciel@foresight/developer/OgMaciel] has joined #launchpad
=== adeuring [n=abel@Fc19e.f.ppp-pool.de] has joined #launchpad
=== stub [n=stub@ppp-58.8.5.12.revip2.asianet.co.th] has joined #launchpad
=== schwuk [n=schwuk@ubuntu/member/schwuk] has joined #launchpad
=== jtv [n=jtv@ppp-58.10.64.111.revip2.asianet.co.th] has joined #launchpad
SteveAWelcome to this week's Launchpad development meeting!  For the next 45 minutes, we'll be coordinating about Launchpad development.03:58
=== kiko-afk is now known as kiko
=== jsk [n=jonathan@client-86-27-130-27.winn.adsl.virgin.net] has joined #launchpad
mptcoNP, I understand the problem you describe, but our designer considered that making project/package links consistent was more important.03:58
SteveAhmm, my computer clock says it's the hour, but my irc server clock says :5803:58
SteveAlet's start anyway03:58
SteveAwho is here today?03:58
mptme03:58
sinzuime03:58
statikme03:58
kikomy clock says :58 too03:58
allenapme03:58
kikome03:58
jtvme03:58
schwukme03:59
jtvand what kiko said03:59
jameshme03:59
EdwinGrubbsme03:59
jskme03:59
adeuringme03:59
carlosme03:59
intellectronicame03:59
salgadome03:59
gmbme03:59
matsubarame03:59
mrevellme03:59
mwhudsonme03:59
coNPmpt: thanks. I hope I'll get used to the new interface. Maybe you could bring back the colors that would help anyway. Thanks for your reply.03:59
danilosme03:59
mptcoNP, yes, that's reported, and should be quite easy to fix.03:59
danilosSteveA: fix the clock :)03:59
bigjoolsme04:00
daniloscarlos: early ping04:00
SteveAdanilos: I keep trying to, but I think I hit an ubuntu bug04:00
=== seb128 [n=seb128@ubuntu/member/seb128] has joined #launchpad
carlosdanilos: early pong04:00
seb128OOPS-600D167704:00
ubotuhttps://devpad.canonical.com/~jamesh/oops.cgi/600D167704:00
SteveABjornT and bac can't make it today.04:00
Rinchenme04:00
mthaddonme04:00
daniloscarlos: ah, haven't seen your 'me' already, sorry :P04:00
carlosdanilos: :-)04:00
BjornTme04:01
bacme04:01
bac:)04:01
bigjoolscprov is not here today, he is bending over for his examination at the US Consulate04:01
SteveABjornT, bac: you're here!04:01
SteveAI guess the agenda page is out of date04:01
bacyes, sorry, that was last week04:01
SteveA== Agenda ==04:01
SteveA * Roll call04:01
SteveA * Agenda04:01
SteveA * Next meeting04:01
SteveA * Actions from last meeting04:01
ddaame04:01
SteveA * Oops report (Matsubara)04:01
SteveA * Critical Bugs (Rinchen)04:01
SteveA * Bug tags04:01
SteveA * Operations report (mthaddon)04:01
SteveA * DBA report (stub)04:01
SteveA * Sysadmin requests (Rinchen)04:01
SteveA * A top user-affecting issue (mrevell)04:01
SteveA----04:01
SteveA * 1k branch limits - barry04:01
SteveA (other items)04:01
SteveA----04:01
SteveA * Blockers04:02
SteveA04:02
stubme04:02
SteveAsame time next week?  various people, me included, will be at an apis sprint in florida04:02
SteveAbut that needn't stop the meeting04:02
barryme04:02
SteveAso, same time next week04:02
SteveA * Actions from last meeting04:02
mrevellI will be on vacation next week.04:02
SteveAnone04:02
SteveAthanks mrevell 04:02
carlosSteveA: is that the new way to say 'enjoying the beach and sun' ?04:02
kikoI won't. :)04:02
SteveA* Oops report (Matsubara)04:02
carlos:-P04:02
matsubaraToday's oops report is about bugs 134063, 134070, 134275, 13426904:02
ubotuLaunchpad bug 134063 in blueprint "OOPS registering sprint or meeting using date format DD-M-YYYY" [Undecided,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/13406304:02
ubotuLaunchpad bug 134070 in launchpad "OOPS registering a team with renewal period equals 0 (zero)" [Medium,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/13407004:02
ubotuLaunchpad bug 134275 in rosetta "Missing download.png image in translation import queue" [Undecided,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/13427504:03
ubotuLaunchpad bug 134269 in soyuz "IntegrityError activating PPA in a stale page" [Undecided,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/13426904:03
matsubarabigjools: can you take the soyuz one?04:03
carlosmatsubara:  https://launchpad.net/bugs/134275 is a trivial fix, change download.png with download04:03
ubotuLaunchpad bug 134275 in rosetta "Missing download.png image in translation import queue" [Undecided,Confirmed]  04:03
bigjoolsmatsubara: it's best left for cprov04:03
carlosI will do it04:03
kikobigjools, the page just needs to check if it already exists.04:03
kikobigjools, it's an easy fix04:03
matsubarathanks carlos04:04
matsubarawho can take the blueprint one? jsk or intellectronica ?04:04
jskyeah04:04
intellectronicamatsubara: blueprint one?04:04
jskbug 13406304:04
kikointellectronica, the sprint one, IOW04:04
matsubarasalgado: the team renewal is yours 04:04
bigjoolskiko: I already discussed with matsubara and he said it wasn't urgent but I can do it if necessary04:04
salgadomatsubara, I may not have time for it on this cycle04:05
kikobigjools, it's not urgent but it might be more of an issue as people start activating PPAs in production, which is why I think it might be a good candidate for an rc today04:05
bigjoolsok04:05
matsubarakiko, bigjools I targeted it to the next cycle, but I don't think it needs a CP04:05
kikosinzui, can you take salgado's two OOPSes?04:05
sinzuikiko: yes04:05
kikomatsubara, won't it happen more often now that people will start using PPAs? I bet it will04:05
kikothanks man04:05
matsubarakiko: might happen, oops reports will tell. cprov told me it's an easy fix though04:06
kikomatsubara, that's my point -- today is the last day for an easy RC04:06
kikoafter that it really requires a CP04:07
matsubarakiko: would you approve that as RC? I'm fine with that.04:07
kikoyes, provided the patch didn't rewrite the world :)04:08
matsubaracarlos patch could be RC as well04:08
=== gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #launchpad
matsubaraand it's trivial and it's generating lots of notfounds :-)04:08
kikoyes, I'd love that.04:08
carlosok04:08
kikomatsubara, did that not show up in the older staging reports?04:08
kikoor did we miss it?04:08
carlosmatsubara: the only thing is that I'm not sure how to write a test for it04:08
carlosother than that, it should be a single line patch04:09
matsubarakiko: missed it. it's in the last reports04:09
mptFor that, the OOPS report *is* the test, no?04:09
kikocarlos, notfound traversals?04:09
carloskiko: well, the problem is that the link was pointing to the wrong url04:09
kikomatsubara, garr04:09
carlosnot that the resource was not correct04:09
matsubaraok. discussion about how to fix/test can happen in the bug report.04:10
carloss/correct/available/04:10
carlosmatsubara: sure04:10
matsubaraSteveA: I'm done here.04:10
matsubarathanks04:10
SteveAthanks matsubara !04:11
SteveA * Critical Bugs (Rinchen)04:11
RinchenFor those of you with Fix Committed bugs, please remember to mark them Fixed Released! 04:11
RinchenStatus updates needed for bug 131043 (jamesh) and bug 132422 (barry) 04:11
ubotuLaunchpad bug 131043 in launchpad "database adapter serialisation tests disabled" [Critical,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/13104304:11
ubotuBug 132422 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/132422 is private04:11
RinchenI need someone to take bug 133630 (maybe barry?)04:11
ubotuBug 133630 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/133630 is private04:11
jameshno change on 13104304:11
Rinchenand a reminder to jtv to close-out bug 132660 04:11
ubotuBug 132660 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/132660 is private04:11
Rinchenthanks jamesh 04:11
barryRinchen: no change on 132422 yet04:11
jtvRinchen: sure, thanks04:11
Rinchenthanks barry, do you have a timeline for132422?04:12
Rinchenjtv, thanks. That went ok?04:12
jtvRinchen: no failures "yet," according to matsubara04:12
barryRinchen: not sure. it's tricky.  is it critical?04:12
=== jtv shoots matsubara a nasty look
barryRinchen: i can take 13363004:12
Rinchenbarry, thanks for 13363004:13
barryRinchen: but that one will take some investigation, so no eta on it04:13
Rinchencarlos, can you advise on 132422 since you filed it?04:13
matsubarajtv: later on today I'll re-run the oops report and let you know if anything shows up04:13
jtvmatsubara: cool, thanks04:13
stubDo we have tracebacks for Bug #133630 ?04:13
ubotuBug 133630 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/133630 is private04:13
kikostub, in the mailing list archives I think04:14
=== stub sighs
carlosRinchen: I don't know, I just detected it with make lint04:14
Rinchencarlos, ok, thanks.04:14
barrycarlos: yes, w/make lint the /problem/ is obvious :)04:15
Rinchenbarry, if you find you are missing information this week on this last one, let me know and I'll try to dig up more details.04:15
Rinchenthanks all, SteveA back to you04:15
SteveAthanks Rinchen !04:16
barryRinchen: cool04:16
SteveA * Bug tags04:16
SteveAtwo proposals today04:16
SteveApackaging04:16
SteveAfor 04:16
SteveAProject-package links -- not obviously either Registry or Soyuz 04:16
SteveAmy first thought is to say "they're soyuz"04:17
mptI misworded that rationale04:17
SteveAI'm interested in what other people think04:17
mptI think that tag would be useful even after a decision about what "project" those bugs belong in.04:17
=== Kmos [n=gothicx@unaffiliated/kmos] has joined #launchpad
mptbecause they're bugs that would often be fixed together.04:17
SteveAcould the tag name 'packaging' be confused with the idea of "we need a new launchpad-dependencies package" ?04:18
mptyes04:18
BjornT"packaging" sounds more like problems with a package, or something needs to be done to package something04:18
mptI was just about to say, it's not necessarily the best name04:18
salgadoyes, that's what I thought it was initially04:18
kikoSteveA, they aren't soyuz, really.04:19
SteveAwhile we consider this one a bit more, let's look at the other proposed tag04:19
SteveAimportqueue04:19
SteveATranslations import queue bugs: import queue bugs usually affect only 'rosetta admins' team, but are almost completely independent from other Translations bugs. (Maybe reuse 'rosetta-imports' tag for this as well?)04:19
danilosSteveA: the other one is from last week, and I haven't done any action as suggested04:19
SteveA04:19
SteveAwe discussed this last week04:20
danilosSteveA: I am ok with moving it to 'Declined' until I come up with better and clearer reasoning04:20
SteveAok, let's reject that one for now.  you can use the rosetta-imports tag.04:20
SteveAok04:20
SteveAthanks danilos 04:20
danilosthanks, Steve04:20
kikoI think packaging is a bad tag, but I think it's worth a tag04:20
SteveAkiko: my rationale for saying they're soyuz is, if we removed soyuz from launchpad, these links would go too.04:20
kikoSteveA, that's not a very good rationale.04:21
SteveAbut then, the same is true if we removed the registry04:21
=== gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #launchpad
kikothe issue is that this is really something that spans LP04:21
mptIf we removed the registry, *most* of Launchpad would disappear04:21
seb128should browsing https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-desktop/nautilus/ubuntu work? it oops at the moment :/04:21
kikoand most of the work that needs doing is actually /not/ in soyuz04:21
kikoseb128, not yet04:21
SteveAkiko: how about calling it the name package-links ?04:21
SteveAor package-link04:21
kikoSteveA, that's a better name04:21
mptok04:22
kikoseb128, doesn't OOPS for me, but yeah, mwhudson has a fix for it already04:22
seb128kiko: "not yet" mean? I though browsing code on launchpad was working for ages04:22
SteveAmpt: you proposed the tag.  how about package-link ?04:22
kikoit will be rolled out04:22
mptthat works for me04:22
SteveAok, done04:22
seb128kiko: OOPS-600D167704:22
ubotuhttps://devpad.canonical.com/~jamesh/oops.cgi/600D167704:22
kikompt, I think it only oopses for the owner.04:22
seb128^ it does that04:22
SteveAthanks everyone04:22
mptkiko, what does?04:22
mwhudsonit oopses for people who can upload04:22
kikompt, I confused you and me there. sorry04:22
mptok04:22
mptby "that" I meant "package-link"04:23
=== SteveA pauses while the support issue is concluded, or moved off-channel
kikopackage-links is better04:23
=== flint-dude [n=bubba2@cpe-066-056-211-072.ec.res.rr.com] has joined #launchpad
SteveAwhy is a plural name better?04:23
SteveAit's longer than the singular04:23
matsubaraseb128: that's bug 4761 which mwhudson fixed already and it's scheduled to be cherrypicked into production04:23
ubotuLaunchpad bug 4761 in offlineimap "offlineimap: merge new debian version" [Medium,Fix released]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/4761 - Assigned to '' (removed346507)04:23
SteveAI guess we have 'rosetta-imports'04:24
mwhudsonmatsubara: i really don't think you meant that bug :)04:24
kikoI guess package-link suggests it's one specific singular link04:24
SteveAanyway, the singular/plural can be discussed later04:24
matsubaraseb128: bug 13422304:24
ubotuLaunchpad bug 134223 in launchpad-bazaar "viewing the index page of a bug you can upload to oopses" [Critical,Fix committed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/134223 - Assigned to Michael Hudson (mwhudson)04:24
kikowhere in fact it's a set of links04:24
SteveAI don't really care which it is04:24
SteveAmoving on now...04:24
SteveA * Operations report (mthaddon)04:24
mthaddon1.1.8 released04:24
mthaddonA number of fixes needed (icingrev and nightly.sh changes, for instance)04:24
mthaddonNeed to rollout to importd (after the meeting)04:24
mthaddonPPA follow up once cprov returns04:24
mthaddonthat's it from me unless there are any questions04:25
SteveAkiko: did you get the icingrev change in?04:25
kikoSteveA, it's in PQM's tummy04:25
SteveAawesome04:25
SteveAawesomerer04:25
SteveAthanks mthaddon 04:26
SteveA * DBA report (stub)04:26
stubNothing to report04:26
seb128matsubara: ok thanks04:26
seb128first time I try to import a package in launchpad, looks like I picked the right day ;)04:26
=== j^ [n=j^@e179004203.adsl.alicedsl.de] has left #launchpad []
bigjoolskiko: PQM's bowels would be more appropriate04:27
SteveAany questions for stub ?04:27
jtvbigjools: doesn't rhyme with "yummy"04:27
kikonot from me04:27
SteveA * Sysadmin requests (Rinchen)04:27
RinchenInteresting work going on in this area still.  Anyone have any blockers?04:27
stubAnd talking about 80 minute bowel movements is just too disgusting even for us.04:27
=== SteveA kicks stub from the channel
SteveA(metaphorically speaking)04:28
Rinchenmthaddon and matsubara  I know about yours. And Kiko the staging one you pointed out04:28
Rinchenare you comfortable with the priority on your items?04:28
mthaddonthat's a yes from me04:29
mwhudsoni still have one about rsyncing importd oopses from macquarie to devpad04:29
matsubarayes04:29
kikoRinchen, it's all good to me04:29
Rinchenmwhudson, right.04:29
matsubarayes, Rinchen 04:29
Rinchenok, thanks. Back to you SteveA 04:29
SteveAthanks Rinchen once again04:30
SteveA * A top user-affecting issue (mrevell)04:30
mrevellI have three things to raise today. Today's main user-affecting issue was raised by mdke. With regard to PPA, he asks:04:30
mrevell"What is the position for packages which contain material which is distributed under licenses which aren't in [the opensource.org]  list but which are still free?"04:30
mrevellHe continues: "Although the opensource.org website itself appears to be licensed under a Creative Commons (attribution) license, no Creative Commons licenses appear in the list, nor does the GFDL."04:30
mrevellThe second issue is a reminder to all Launchpad users in attendance that, temporarily, bug searches no longer search in bug comments. Searching bug comments was causing an unacceptable number of timeouts but will return when the fix has been created.04:30
mrevellThe final issue is another reminder to anyone using PPA: the beta is still in dogfood for the time being and we will move it to production Launchpad within the next few days. Although you may see some PPA-related UI in production Launchpad, please continue to use dogfood.04:30
mrevellThanks SteveA.04:31
jameshmrevell: are we talking about source code material or non-source code materiel?04:31
mrevelljamesh: In mdke's particular case, he's talking about Ubuntu documentation.04:31
SteveAmrevell: on the licence issue, what packages have GFDL or CC stuff that have given rise to this question?04:32
mrevelljamesh: Some of which is GPL, some GFDL and so on.04:32
mrevellSteveA: I believe mdke is looking at using PPA to create packages for the docs team.04:32
SteveAI think if something is good enough for the CC, it's good enough for us.  That's just, like, my opinion.04:32
SteveAkiko: what do you think?04:32
SteveAthe CC as in the Community Council04:33
jameshSteveA: a lot of GNU packages have GFDL documentation which would bar them from our current T.O.S.04:33
SteveAnot the Creative Commons04:33
kikoI agree with SteveA 04:33
kikoso perhaps our TOS needs amending04:33
SteveAjamesh: I'm proposing amending the TOS to include GFDL if the Com Coun has approved GFDL stuff for inclusion in ubuntu04:33
kikowhat SteveA said!04:33
danilosI'd agree on that one04:33
mptSteveA, Ubuntu CC approval makes sense as long as PPAs are only for Ubuntu04:34
SteveAmrevell: so, the answer is, if you get a request to allow a licence that isn't in our TOS04:34
SteveAmrevell: then check whether the CC allows it in Ubuntu04:34
BjornTstub: re the second issue, did you see that i re-opened and assigned bug 70665 to you?04:34
ubotuLaunchpad bug 70665 in malone "Allow searching in comments" [High,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/70665 - Assigned to Stuart Bishop (stub)04:34
mrevellSteveA: thank you04:34
SteveAmrevell: if so, then ask on the launchpad list for an addition to our TOS04:34
elmoGFDL is fine for Ubuntu04:34
SteveA(perhaps by filing a bug)04:34
elmo(FTR)04:34
mrevellthanks elmo04:35
SteveAFTW!04:35
mrevell:)04:35
SteveAelmo: what about Creative Commons (attribution) ?04:35
jameshelmo: is there anything written up about this that we could reference in the PPA TOS?04:35
stubBjorn: ack. No idea when I can look at it though.04:35
jameshrather than maintaining our own rules04:35
ubotuNew bug: #134070 in launchpad "OOPS registering a team with renewal period equals 0 (zero)" [Medium,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/13407004:35
RinchenSteveA, kiko - we still on in 1 hour with Mark?04:36
Rinchenw/c of course04:37
SteveAstub, Rinchen: please talk about what cycle we can plan 70665 in04:37
kikodunno. are we?04:37
RinchenSteveA, will do04:37
SteveAthanks mrevell !04:37
kikoSteveA, the problem with 70665 is that it requires either an upstream fix, or more research.04:37
SteveA * 1k branch limits - barry04:37
barryso we've imposed a limit on the size of branches to make life manageable for reviewers04:38
barryit's a 2k limit despite the agenda title :)04:38
danilosis this about the on-list email you sent?04:38
SteveAkiko: if we at least target it to a release, and put aside some of stub's time to work on it in that release, then we'll be in a good posistion to either fix it, or bounce it to a future release04:38
barrydanilos: yes04:38
SteveAkiko: this is a better position than "no idea"04:38
kikoSteveA, yeah, I agree with it not falling off the radar -- totally04:38
barrydid anybody not read that message, or does anybody have any questions about it?04:38
kikobarry, I think that's a great idea. <wink>04:39
barrykiko: thought you might :)04:39
RinchenI'm +1 for a 2k limit.04:39
barryokay?  well, if there's nothing else. back to you SteveA04:39
barryRinchen: thanks!04:39
SteveAthanks barry 04:39
SteveA * Blockers04:39
sinzuiAnswer Tracker: BLOCKED: no04:40
barryTEAM: mailing lists BLOCKED: no04:40
matsubaraTEAM: infrastructure BLOCKED: no04:40
BjornTTEAM: bug tracker BLOCKED: no04:40
salgadoTEAM: Registry BLOCKED: NO04:40
jtvTEAM: Translations, BLOCKED: no04:40
SteveAfor the next cycle, let's do these by Launchpad teams04:40
EdwinGrubbsTEAM: Commercialization BLOCKED: no04:40
SteveAum, I mean, for next week04:40
bigjoolsTEAM: Soyuz BLOCKED: decision on Gutsy commercial upload pocket04:40
mptTEAM: UI BLOCKED: Feedback from commercialization team about distribution permissions04:40
ddaaTEAM Code. BLOCKED: code-import db patch approval, machine for staging codehosting.04:40
intellectronicaTEAM: Blueprint BLOCKED: No04:40
=== norsetto wakes up and find himself in the middle of a meeting :-[
SteveAnorsetto: very near the end, actually :-)04:41
adeuringTTeam HWDB: Blocked: NO04:41
SteveAok04:42
SteveAwe're all done04:42
Rinchenmpt,  you mean statik?04:42
SteveAthanks for being here, and keeping us moving along04:42
mptsinzui, ddaa, adeuring: just btw, it saves me about 30 seconds if you follow the exact "TEAM: X BLOCKED: Y" format of the other teams :-)04:42
SteveAMEETING ENDS04:42
mptRinchen, I guess so04:43
Rinchenmpt,  ok, I'll chat with his team today04:43
mptthough I hadn't kept track of how many were in the team :-)04:43
jtvnorsetto: see, if you'd just kept your eyes closed a few minutes longer, you could've saved yourself the embarrassment :)04:43
=== norsetto helps himself with the leftover coffee ...
EdwinGrubbsmpt: what are distribution permissions?04:43
sinzuimpt: If I ever have a chance to do this again, I will follow the format.04:43
mptthanks sinzui04:43
mptEdwinGrubbs, see bug 3210404:44
ubotuLaunchpad bug 32104 in launchpad "+edit and +launchpad should be merged" [Medium,In progress]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/32104 - Assigned to Matthew Paul Thomas (mpt)04:44
mrevellmatsubara: I'm going to grab a cup of tea, then do you have five minutes for me?04:44
mptEdwinGrubbs, basically whether distribution registrars should be able to say that their distribution uses Launchpad for bugtracking etc04:44
matsubaramrevell: yes, I'll grab something to eat too. ping me when you're ready.04:45
mrevellcool04:45
ubotuNew bug: #134063 in blueprint "OOPS registering sprint or meeting using date format DD-M-YYYY" [Undecided,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/13406304:45
mptthanks Rinchen 04:46
bdmurrayDoes the commentedbugs list included won't fix or invalid bugs?04:51
Odd_BlokeHey guys, is there a quicker way to push a branch to LP than using 'bzr push'?04:51
gmbbdmurray: Do you mean the list of bugs on which you have commented.04:53
gmb?04:53
bdmurraygmb: correct04:53
gmbbdmurray: Let me just check...04:53
gmbbdmurray: No, it won't, because those bugs are considered to be closed.04:55
gmbbdmurray: But you can do an advanced search for those bugs if you wish.04:56
mptgmb, so this is probably new scope for bug 597704:56
ubotuLaunchpad bug 5977 in malone "Person Bugs pages seems to be incomplete" [Medium,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/597704:56
gmbmpt: Agreed.04:57
bdmurraygmb: okay, thanks I suspected as much.04:57
gmbbdmurray: np.04:57
=== jsk__ [n=jonathan@client-86-27-130-27.winn.adsl.virgin.net] has joined #launchpad
bdmurrayWhat is the e-mail command for adding a bug tag?04:57
=== gmb is now known as gmb-afk
bdmurrayIs it just "tag my-new-tag" ?04:58
mptbdmurray, there isn't one currently afaik04:58
bdmurraympt: It was in today's release notes04:58
matsubarampt: of course there is!04:58
mptoh!04:58
mptneat04:59
matsubarabug 5838804:59
ubotuLaunchpad bug 58388 in malone "Implement a tag command in the email interface" [Medium,Fix committed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/58388 - Assigned to Dave Murphy (schwuk)04:59
schwukbdmurray: yes, that will add a new tag to a bug04:59
bdmurrayIt isn't documented yet - https://help.launchpad.net/UsingMaloneEmail04:59
bdmurrayschwuk: can you subtract a tag too?05:00
schwukbdmurray: yes05:00
schwuktag -my-new-tag05:00
bdmurrayschwuk: neat!05:00
seb128are new bugs coming from "Launchpad Bug Tracker" a bug or a change made on purpose?05:00
matsubaraseb128: on purpose05:01
seb128hum, k05:01
seb128what is the rational?05:01
mptseb128, iirc, because they represent changes that weren't made by the reporter (e.g. a bug being assigned to someone), so it wasn't reasonable to represent them as coming from the reporter05:03
seb128k05:03
seb128bug reassigned from an another package are in this case?05:04
seb128usually the description of the bug is coming from the submitter05:04
seb128he just didn't get the package right05:04
ubotuNew bug: #134301 in rosetta "AttributeError: 'unicode' object has no attribute 'code'" [Undecided,In progress]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/13430105:05
mptseb128, not sure05:05
mptallenap?05:05
matsubarathanks jtv 05:05
allenapmpt: hi05:06
mptallenap, can you answer seb128's question?05:06
allenapmpt, seb128: Not sure on this one. I think BjornT was involved with these changes. BjornT?05:09
=== tck [n=tck@213-202-140-94.bas502.dsl.esat.net] has joined #launchpad
BjornTthe notifications from 'Launchpad Bug Tracker' are the ones that say that you have been subscribed to a bug, which can mean either that you are actually subscribed to the bug, or that the bug was re-assigned to a package, of which you are a bug contact (and you weren't a bug contact of the the previous package)05:17
BjornTseb128: ^^^05:18
seb128BjornT: I find it annoying in the case it reassigned to the correct package05:18
seb128I like to know who submitted the bug05:18
seb128because I don't consider it the same way if that's a distro team guy or a regular contributor or somebody I don't know05:18
seb128would you consider a request for reassigned bugs to be displayed as coming from the bug submitter as valid?05:19
BjornTseb128: would it be enough to include the sumbmitter in the body of the notification?05:20
seb128yes05:20
seb128though I don't get the interest to add content05:21
seb128especially than you can see the From from the mails listing05:21
seb128thinking about it I like the From; better05:22
seb128you can filter on it quickly, etc05:22
BjornTseb128: ok, we could add it to the body of the notification at least. having it in the From field is quite tricky, since it's often confusing. we changed the From field for exactly this reason05:23
seb128I'm not sure how it's confusing to send the bug description as coming from the bug submitter05:24
=== radhios [n=radhios@96-208-126-200.fibertel.com.ar] has joined #launchpad
kikoseb128, the problem is that the bug submitter is not actually causing /that/ email to be sent.05:25
BjornTseb128: well, quite a lot of people complained about it (for the reason kiko mentioned)05:26
kikoit's actually very confusing05:26
seb128so maybe a verbatim copy should not be sent to the bug contact then05:26
=== gmb-afk is now known as gmb
seb128you should rather send "bug nnnnn has been reassigned to your product"05:26
seb128because at the moment it looks like a new bug coming on your product from launchpad bug tracker05:27
kikodoesn't the message body say something?05:29
seb128"You have been subscribed to a public bug:" rather than "Public bug reported:" in the first line05:29
=== neversfelde|mobi [n=neversfe@82.113.106.1] has joined #launchpad
seb128it's very tricky to notice the difference05:29
seb128it really look like a new bug opened05:29
kikothe text could be changed05:30
kikobut will you read it?05:30
seb128well if you include the name of the submitter maybe05:30
seb128but I would really like better having the "From" having the submitter05:30
seb128so I can filter quickly05:30
seb128and look to my mailbox and know what mails I want to read (those coming from people I know for example)05:31
=== Nafallo thinks seb128 is planning to killfile him :-P
Hobbseeseb128: maybe they need a header for quality of the bug05:31
seb128Hobbsee: not really as good, you don't have those displayed in the mails list05:31
seb128you would either have to setup filter on the content05:31
seb128or to open every single bugs and that would not give you "by submitter" easy sorting05:32
Hobbseeseb128: no, launchpad should autodetect the quality of the bug, and close anything with a score of "crap" :P05:32
Nafallo"You sent a crappy bug. Please don't do that."05:34
NafalloI can't imagine the reaction that would get ;-)05:34
seb128"if you can't figure the right component maybe you should not open a bug" ;)05:34
NafalloLOL05:35
Hobbseeyeah :P05:35
Hobbseeseb128: it surprises me about apport, with people thinking they dont have to write everything, as it's all automated.05:35
=== sinzui [n=sinzui@pool-70-17-67-100.res.east.verizon.net] has left #launchpad []
=== alex-weej [n=alex@cpc2-darl3-0-0-cust237.midd.cable.ntl.com] has joined #launchpad
alex-weejhi05:43
alex-weejon a bug entry page, there are packages listed under "affects"05:43
alex-weejand links to "also affects upstream" and "... distribution/package"05:43
alex-weejthis terminology seems to be a little bit off with what some people expect; i think the old terminology might have been "tasks", implying that there is "something to do" for a specific package05:44
=== radhios [n=radhios@96-208-126-200.fibertel.com.ar] has joined #launchpad
=== mayeco [n=mayeco@200.75.192.12] has joined #launchpad
mayecothe ppa is working or not?05:49
mayecois in live site or only in dogfood?05:49
=== danilos [n=danilo@adsl-236-193.eunet.yu] has joined #launchpad
kikomayeco, on dogfood still -- we're setting up the production boxes still this week05:57
kikobut the code is all good05:57
Nafallothis week. kewl :-)05:57
mayecokiko: thanks :D05:57
mayecothat thing is super kool!05:58
kikoit is indeed 05:58
kikoblog about it!05:58
mayeco:S05:58
=== jtv [n=jtv@125-24-222-124.adsl.totbb.net] has joined #launchpad
=== dieman [n=dieman@destiny.ringworld.org] has joined #launchpad
ubotuNew bug: #134309 in malone "External bug tracker for Mantis should be able to fetch status for individual bugs" [Undecided,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/13430906:15
Ek0nomikWould anyone be able to help me sign the code of conduct?  I keep entering what was given to me in the *.asc file, but I get this error:06:33
Ek0nomikPlease fix the problems below and try again.06:33
Ek0nomik(7, 9, 'No public key')06:33
Ek0nomikbut, my key is already on the server:  http://keyserver.ubuntu.com:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x6C77D4B1&op=index06:33
ubotuNew bug: #134312 in launchpad "Checkwatches script doesn't use correct DB user" [Critical,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/13431206:36
kikoEk0nomik, hmmmm. could the syncing be broken again, elmo?06:37
elmokiko: it's not, I just checked06:38
elmothat key is retrievable from the internal server06:38
kikohmmm06:38
kikothanks06:38
=== xxxxx1 [n=xxxxx1@200.174.45.170] has joined #launchpad
kikoEk0nomik, what are you placing in the input box?06:38
Ek0nomikthe whole contents of the *.asc file.06:38
kikoEk0nomik, I mean in the GPG key upload06:39
kikoEk0nomik, what's your launchpad homepage?06:39
Ek0nomikhttps://launchpad.net/~ek0nomik06:39
=== mthaddon [n=mthaddon@canonical/launchpad/mthaddon] has joined #launchpad
kikoEk0nomik, are you sure you signed with that key?06:39
=== intellectronic1 [n=intellec@host86-139-53-135.range86-139.btcentralplus.com] has joined #launchpad
Ek0nomikUnder Step 1. Register an OpenPGP key.06:40
Ek0nomikIt appears you have already done this; the key 6C77D4B1 is registered on your account. You can skip to the next step if you are not intending on signing with a different key. 06:40
=== PriceChild [n=pricechi@ubuntu/member/pdpc.supporter.student.PriceChild] has joined #launchpad
matsubaraEk0nomik: can you paste (http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/) the signed code of conduct that you're pasting into LP?06:48
Ek0nomikhttp://pastebin.ubuntu.com/20/\06:49
Ek0nomikwhoops.06:49
Ek0nomikhttp://pastebin.ubuntu.com/20/06:49
Ek0nomikany dice?06:56
=== never|mobi [n=neversfe@82.113.106.1] has joined #launchpad
matsubaraEk0nomik: you seem to have signed it with:  key ID 432EE88107:00
Ek0nomikwt..07:00
Ek0nomikhow do I sign with the 6C77D4B1 key?07:01
matsubaraEk0nomik: $ gpg -u 6C77D4B1 --clearsign codeofconduct.txt07:05
=== gmb is now known as gmb-afk
=== kiko is now known as kiko-fud
=== matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch
=== Mez [n=Mez@ubuntu/member/mez] has joined #launchpad
=== Mez_ [n=Mez@ubuntu/member/mez] has joined #launchpad
Ek0nomikthanks matsubara.  :)07:13
=== zwnj is now known as zwn1
=== zwn1 is now known as zwnj
bdmurrayWhere did the $pkgname source expandy go?07:30
bdmurrayThe one on the lefthand side?07:30
=== mrevell is now known as mrevell-dinner
=== Prognatus__ [n=irc@201.80-202-51.nextgentel.com] has joined #launchpad
=== Prognatus__ is now known as Prognatus
=== superm1 [n=superm1@ubuntu/member/superm1] has joined #launchpad
ubotuNew bug: #54329 in ubuntu "Error when launcher target not found needs to be user-readable" [Low,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/5432907:50
=== gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #launchpad
norsettobdmurray: isn't that on the package name now? (where it used to be the status).07:54
bdmurraynorsetto: the expandy would show you the latest version of the package which was handy to see if the bug reporter had the latest version07:56
norsettobdmurray: yes, its a bit convoluted now, you have to go to overview07:57
norsettobdmurray: and then you find the expandy on the left07:58
bdmurraynorsetto: right and then you are "away" from the bug report that you were working on07:59
norsettobdmurray: yep07:59
=== helix84 [n=a@adsl-dyn107.91-127-42.t-com.sk] has left #launchpad []
norsettobdmurray: why not filing a bug report in launchpad asking for it to be back? it shouldn't be a big deal08:00
bdmurraynorsetto: okay, I wasn't sure if it had just moved on me. :)08:00
norsettobdmurray: hehe08:01
norsettobdmurray: in the meantime you can use a terminal08:01
bdmurraynorsetto: what do you mean?  Isn't any terminal command dependent on me running the same release as the bug report?08:03
bdmurrayterminal command to check for a package version08:03
norsettobdmurray: not necessarily, for instance you can use rmadison (or apt-cache)08:03
norsettobdmurray: an example, try rmadison -u ubuntu <package-name> and see what it gives you08:04
norsettormadison is using a remote query; apt-cache is using the local cache (so the latter is quicker but needs you to keep the cache updated)08:06
bdmurraynorsetto: right, I've used apt-cache before but not rmadison.  plus with apt-cache you have to manipulate your sources.list right?08:06
norsettobdmurray: indeed08:07
norsettobdmurray: I use rmadison when I need to check what version is where, and the advantage is also that you can check debian (not important for you I guess)08:08
bdmurraynorsetto: I don't seem to have '-u' as an option08:08
norsettobdmurray: are you on feisty?08:09
bdmurraynorsetto: at the moment yes08:09
norsettobdmurray: thats why then, IIRC its not yet implemented in the feisty version08:10
gnomefreakcan PPA archives deal with more than one distro at a time? example upload gutsy packages and feisty packages to same PPA and use something like deb http://ppa.dogfood.launchpad.net/mozillateam/ubuntu gutsy bleh and http://ppa.dogfood.launchpad.net/mozillateam/ubuntu feisty bleh...08:10
bdmurraynorsetto: right, doesn't seem so.  Thanks for the information regarding rmadison.08:11
norsettobdmurray: np, too bad it doesn't help08:11
bdmurraynorsetto: I've been using apt-cache madison and I can work around the functionality not being in the bug page anymore.  I just thought it was quite convenient to have it right there.08:13
=== matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara
=== kiko-fud is now known as kiko
kikobdmurray, not having what right there?08:25
=== EdwinGrubbs [n=edwin@m815f36d0.tmodns.net] has joined #launchpad
bdmurraykiko: the information expandy on the left hand side regarding the latest version of the source package08:28
=== lbm [n=lbm@0x555373ab.adsl.cybercity.dk] has joined #launchpad
kikobdmurray, was that removed?08:28
bdmurraykiko: as far as I can tell yes08:29
kikompt, do you confirm?08:29
mptkiko, yes, it's reported08:30
mptI'll target it to 1.1.908:30
kikothanks.08:30
kikobdmurray, sorry! :)08:30
bdmurraympt: what bug number?08:30
bdmurrayI just want to subscribe08:31
mptI don't remember08:32
Amaranthgnomefreak: As I accidentally found out, yes08:44
gnomefreakcool ty Amaranth :)08:44
=== EdwinGrubbs [n=edwin@m815f36d0.tmodns.net] has joined #launchpad
=== LaserJock [n=mantha@ubuntu/member/laserjock] has joined #launchpad
=== radhios [n=radhios@96-208-126-200.fibertel.com.ar] has joined #launchpad
=== effie_jayx [n=valles@ubuntu/member/effie-jayx] has joined #launchpad
=== gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #launchpad
LaserJockso PPA is still only available for Beta Testers and still only on dogfood?08:55
kikoLaserJock, we're moving it, but there's a server issue or two that need to be cleared up, should be all done by early next week08:55
kikothe builders and build scheduler08:56
kikoneed movin'08:56
mptbdmurray, bug 13422008:56
ubotuLaunchpad bug 134220 in malone "the new layout has no informations about the current version" [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/13422008:56
LaserJockkiko: ok, so next week it should go live on main LP and will anybody be able to use it or just Beta Testers?08:57
bdmurraympt: thanks08:57
mptbdmurray, what would you think about including the version number of the latest version in the table inside the expandable section?09:00
mpte.g.09:00
mptAffecting: firefox (Ubuntu)09:00
=== EdwinGrubbs [n=edwin@cpe-66-25-91-128.satx.res.rr.com] has joined #launchpad
mptLatest version: 2.0.3-ubuntuwotsit09:00
mptFiled here by: B D Murray09:01
mptetc09:01
=== EdwinGrubbs [n=edwin@cpe-66-25-91-128.satx.res.rr.com] has joined #launchpad
bdmurraympt: personally I think that chews uses too much space to glean that little bit of information09:02
bdmurraybecause you might not know the submitters package version in the first comment09:02
bdmurrayso would have to scroll down even more to find it09:03
mptscroll down?09:03
mptNo, I mean the expandable section in the "Affects" table09:03
mptthat already has a table with "Affecting:", "Filed here by:", and "When:" rows09:04
=== EdwinGrubbs_ [n=edwin@cpe-66-25-92-150.satx.res.rr.com] has joined #launchpad
bdmurrayRight but when you expand that it shifts down all comments right?09:05
mptFor as long as you have it open, yes09:05
bdmurraybecause you have the comment on this change box09:05
norsettoanyone here that can migrate my pgp keys to my dogfood account?09:05
mptAh, so you want to be able to see the reporter's version, and the latest version, simultaneously09:05
mptok09:05
seb128mpt: right, to know if the user is uptodate09:06
bdmurraympt: ideally yes. the location isn't that important.09:06
mptSo that would work if we didn't have so much navigation stuff at the top of the page09:06
mptand if we had only one comment field per bug report09:06
mptbecause then you *would* be able to see both of them simultaneously09:07
mptbut so long as we don't, it probably needs to be a box down the side instead.09:07
=== Kmos [n=gothicx@unaffiliated/kmos] has joined #launchpad
=== helix84 [n=a@adsl-dyn107.91-127-42.t-com.sk] has joined #launchpad
=== helix84 [n=a@adsl-dyn107.91-127-42.t-com.sk] has left #launchpad []
=== EdwinGrubbs_ [n=edwin@cpe-66-25-92-150.satx.res.rr.com] has joined #launchpad
Kmoskiko: can you delete the zzz ones now? https://launchpad.net/bugs/bugtrackers09:12
=== mdz [i=mdz@nat/canonical/x-7daf0e659d3e98df] has joined #launchpad
kikoKmos, not yet -- we don't yet support dupes09:14
kikoKmos, I want to promote you to official bugtracker gardener :)09:15
Kmoskiko: it will be a pleasure for me :)09:18
=== mhb [n=mhb@ubuntu/member/mhb] has left #launchpad []
Kmoskiko: so only 1.1.9 will have support for that?09:19
kikoKmos, I just need to get the privileges sorted out and a process for you09:19
kikoKmos, I'm HOPING BjornT will have pity on us and do it for 1.1.9 :)09:19
Kmosthat's nice09:19
Kmoskiko: i'm not even an ubuntu member.. maybe they won't accept it09:19
kikothis isn't anything to do with ubuntu09:20
=== Kmos is currently working on set powertop 1.8 from debian to ubuntu universe trought motu uvf procedures
Kmos:)09:20
ubotuNew bug: #134345 in launchpad "Link to Terms of Service on 'Activate Personal Package Archive' goes to a nonexistant wiki page." [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/13434509:20
Kmoskiko: yeah, LP is one thing, ubuntu is another09:20
Kmos=)09:20
kikooh good grief09:20
=== gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #launchpad
mptwhat09:21
mptterms of service on a wiki?09:22
mpt"You hereby agree to KILROY WAS HERE"09:22
kikoyes09:24
seb128kiko: is there a way to workaround the "registering a bzr branch requires an upstream product with the same name"?09:28
=== helix84 [n=a@adsl-dyn107.91-127-42.t-com.sk] has joined #launchpad
kikoseb128, well, you could upload something as +junk09:28
seb128I don't want to do that ;)09:28
seb128I want to maintain desktop packages in bzr09:28
seb128but gnome-vfs is name gnome-vfs2 for example09:28
seb128or gtk+ gtk+2.009:28
seb128or epiphany epiphany-browser09:29
kikoseb128, and why is using a different name a problem?09:30
seb128different name than what?09:30
kikowhy is the name of the branch important, IOW?09:31
seb128I would like the branch having the same name than the package for obvious reasons09:31
seb128well, because otherwise it's going to be complicated for users09:31
seb128and for scripting09:31
seb128it's much easier if you can use apt-get and bzr on the same name09:31
seb128and not to know that the gtk+2.0 package is named gtk+ in launchpad09:32
LaserJockyep, that's a tough one especially09:32
=== flint-dude [n=bubba2@cpe-066-056-211-072.ec.res.rr.com] has joined #launchpad
=== Spads [n=spacehob@unaffiliated/spads] has joined #launchpad
seb128s/and not/and don't need/09:33
seb128is there any reason to require an upstream product to add a packaging branch?09:33
kikoseb128, it's just that it's not currently set up.09:34
kikothat way.09:35
seb128is that likely to change any time soon?09:35
kikoddaa, wanna context switch to this discussion?09:36
kikoseb128, unlikely to be /real/ soon, to be honest, but I think we need to sort this out09:36
=== ddaa reads backlog
seb128kiko: the easy workaround would be to use one packaging branch for the team09:37
kikoddaa, seb128 wants to upload branches for packages, irrespective of history. 09:37
seb128register a random product09:37
seb128and use a directory by package in the branch09:37
ddaaso...09:38
ddaaideally09:38
ddaaI think it should be possible to have package branches in the way we have product branches.09:38
ddaabut nobody has figured out how it should look like, even less scheduled time to do it.09:38
=== _gpg_ [n=tar_a@82.251.185.156] has joined #launchpad
_gpg_hello09:39
ddaaI think registering an ubuntu-packaging or debian-packaging product is a reasonably to deal with the issue now.09:39
ddaaIt's connected to another current issue.09:39
kikoddaa, it's easy to migrate from that to something else later, right?09:40
ddaaWhich is "where to put the productseries for a svn import of a packaging branch from debian svn?"09:40
seb128in this case that would be a ubuntu-desktop product09:40
ddaaATM, people seem to have decided to create a "debian" productseries in the product.09:40
ddaaWhich I think is borken.09:40
_gpg_i would linke to know where ca n i find about launchpad licence, it it would be open source etc, can any one help me please ?09:40
ddaaI think it would be better to have a debian-packaging product, and have series named after the package there.09:41
seb128"series" = "branches"?09:41
ddaakiko: anything which is consistent is reasonably easy to migrate, I guess.09:41
ddaaseb128: no productseries, like "trunk"09:41
mpt_gpg_, <https://launchpad.net/faq>, 2/3 of the way down the page09:41
ddaathe object you need to get a code import at the moment.09:41
seb128ok09:42
ddaaOne of my worries if that if we start to get "debian" series all over the place, users will see it and duplicate the pattern.09:42
_gpg_mpt: ty09:42
seb128I don't expect launchpad changing really quickly so we will likely workaround for now by creating a product for the team and using a directory by package there09:42
ddaaand we'll have a mess in no time that we won't be able to deal with whenever we want to transition to something else.09:43
seb128ddaa, kiko: thanks09:43
ddaaseb128: can you keep me posted of what comes out?09:43
seb128ddaa, kiko: should I raise the issue on some mailing-list?09:43
ddaaseb128: some ubuntu-devels list would be good start, as other ubuntu ppl are asking the same question.09:43
ddaaI really just want you guys to adopt a policy that is consistent and you are happy with.09:44
seb128well, ubuntu lists will not make a difference09:44
ddaaThen inform the Launchpad ML of what you decided.09:44
seb128I'll say "the requirements to have a product with the same name as the package sucks" and the distro people will likely agree09:44
seb128I don't know how launchpad internals are organized09:45
seb128but I would happy to just not have the upstream product obligation09:45
seb128like we have an team maintaining packages09:45
seb128I would like to be able to add a branch for every package there09:46
ddaaseb128: really, the Launchpad model has no provision for those "packaging branches".09:46
seb128does it need to fit in some model?09:46
seb128why can't a team just have random bzr branches?09:46
ddaabecause sabdfl said teams shall not have +junk branches.09:46
seb128well, that's not junk09:47
seb128that's an ubuntu package09:47
ddaaWhat namespace would you use for those branches then?09:47
seb128I would be happy to "the branch name must be the one of a distro package"09:47
ddaathat conflicts with our current branch namespace09:48
ddaaand which distro?09:48
ddaawhich distrorelease?09:48
ddaaetc.09:48
ddaaYou probably want different branches for each distro release.09:48
seb128that's not going to be easy09:48
seb128maybe we should just ask to be honest on the alioth svn ;)09:48
seb128s/honest/hosted09:49
ddaaYes, that's why nobody has decided how it should look like yet.09:49
ddaaseb128: sure, if you're happy with that. Then I want you guys to agree on a policy for dummy productseries you create to request bzr imports.09:49
seb128that discussion would not be right placed on the ubuntu side because most of us don't know about launchpad requirements, namespaces, structure, etc09:50
ddaaATM, we're going to have ~vcs-imports/nspr/debian09:50
ddaa(which sucks IMO)09:51
ddaaseb128: then ask on the Launchpad ML09:51
seb128mdz: around?09:51
ddaabut when this sort of trans-project discussion occurs, it tends to end in mid-air09:51
seb128mdz: do you know if there is any reflection or work in progress going on on "being able to create branches for ubuntu packages on launchpad"?09:51
ddaaI have the impression it's because each side expects the other to know how things should look like.09:52
seb128well, I know what I need09:52
seb128I need to be able to create random bzr branches for a team09:52
ddaaIn which way would team-owned +junk branches be inadequate?09:53
seb128I'm not sure I understand what +junk mean09:53
ddaait means "no associated product"09:53
seb128it's not junk, it's nice packaging ;)09:53
LaserJockbut they aren't junk09:54
ddaait's called like that to encourage ppl to put branches in the right product.09:54
LaserJockI think most people think +junk == throw away09:54
seb128well, call them "junk" if you want09:54
seb128I can workaround it by creating random upstream product for every package I want to add09:54
seb128but that's ugly, extra work, and doesn't make things nicer for anybody09:55
seb128gnome-vfs2 has an upstream product, it's just named gnome-vfs09:55
ddaaI think that would be what sabdfl would like.09:55
ddaamh09:55
kikoddaa, what do you mean?09:55
ddaa"creating random upstream product for every package I want to add"09:56
ddaaseb128: ask fabbione about .info files :)09:56
=== tck [n=tck@213-202-168-142.bas503.dsl.esat.net] has joined #launchpad
fabbioneDIE DIE DIE09:56
ddaaor Keybuk09:56
ddaaright09:56
seb128ddaa: I think I helped fabbione with them when I started at Canonical ;)09:56
fabbionewe all share the same feeling about info files09:57
fabbioneDIE DIE DIE DIE09:57
ddaaSo, the modern equivalent is "create a project in Launchpad"09:57
ddaaI believe the motivation for them has not gone away.09:57
seb128well, I don't want to have to create a product to forward a bug or put a package in bzr09:57
ddaaJust that the dumb idea of doing them in bulk before they are needed has gone away.09:57
seb128that's just to much work09:57
seb128and there is some package where is there is no proper upstream09:58
ddaaseb128: I agree with you09:58
seb128like no website, etc09:58
ddaaI cannot help you with that.09:58
ddaaBring that to mdz, and have him bring that to sabdfl.09:58
seb128will do that09:58
LaserJockseb128: what about native packages?09:58
seb128thanks for replying to my questions09:58
ddaaseb128: you're welcome.09:59
ddaaLaserJock: they need a project too.09:59
LaserJockyikes09:59
=== radhios [n=radhios@96-208-126-200.fibertel.com.ar] has joined #launchpad
ddaait's not because upstream is a distro that it should not be modelled as a project in Launchpad.09:59
ddaaNot saying it's good.10:00
ddaaSaying that's the way Launchpad thinks.10:00
LaserJockit sounds to me as if projects could be in danger of becoming so ubiquitous that they end up being useless10:01
ddaakiko: that's for you to answer :)10:01
ddaadiscussion is moving out of my dept quiclky10:01
LaserJockI mean, if we have gnome-vfs and gnome-vfs2 projects and they're really the same thing10:02
ddaathere should not be duplicates10:02
LaserJockbut how can you determine that10:03
ddaaeyeballs10:03
LaserJockbut already seb128 has illustrated how it could easily become duplicated10:03
ddaaduplication is the wrong solution, I am sure of that10:03
ddaano idea what the right solution is10:04
ddaaOne upstream project (even if upstream is a distro) == one project in Launchpad.10:04
ddaaWe could have branches named like10:04
LaserJockok, but you're tying package names to project names10:05
ddaa~owner/distro/release/srcpkg/name10:05
=== radhios [n=radhios@96-208-126-200.fibertel.com.ar] has joined #launchpad
ddaaLaserJock: we are supposed to have a links between project series and source packages.10:06
ddaaThey are a badly unloved part of Launchpad ATM.10:06
ddaaNothing tying package and project names.10:06
ddaaJust devels dislike for inconsistent naming.10:06
ddaaThe inconsistent naming is what needs fixing.10:07
LaserJockI don't think it's inconsistent naming really10:07
LaserJockif we have gnome-vfs as a project10:07
mpt( Report as inappropriate )10:07
mptWhy is this project inapproprate?10:07
ddaaspam10:07
mpt( ) It does not appear to be software10:07
LaserJockbecuase the package name is gnome-vfs210:08
mpt( ) It seems to exist primarily for spam purposes10:08
mpt( ) It is someone wanting an Ubuntu CD10:08
mpt( ) It is a duplicate of another project10:08
mpt    Which other project? [              ] 10:08
ddaais that existing UI?10:08
mptno10:09
mptbut it should be ;-)10:09
ddaayes please10:09
ddaathat does not address the problem LaserJock and seb128 are talking about, but it would help placate people trying to solve it the wrong way.10:09
mptyes10:09
mptI have a vague idea about how to solve LaserJock's/seb128's problem10:10
=== ddaa goes to cook pasta
mptbut it requires existing thorough project-package links10:10
ddaago on, I'll check the scrollback10:10
ddaawell10:11
mptwhich we don't have10:11
mpt(which was partly the motivation for the QA that led to my proposing the tag this morning)10:11
=== cprov-out is now known as cprov
mptThe vague idea is10:11
mptfrom a project's page, say "I want to package this project"10:12
mptLaunchpad says "for what distribution?", and you say "Fooix"10:12
mptAnd Launchpad says "ah, so you'll want to call the package X, because that's the name of this project's packages in Fooix".10:13
ddaathat's not adressing the right problem10:16
ddaaseb128 is unhappy because the Ubuntu source package names do not match upstream project names.10:16
mptBut isn't that a problem regardless of whether PPAs exist?10:16
ddaaand he wants the packaging branches to be named consistently after corresponding source packages.10:16
ddaaAIUI it has nothing to do with PPA10:17
ddaait's more a Foobuntu kind of problem.10:17
mptah10:17
mptso for "package" above read "branch"10:18
ddaariht10:18
ddaabut that still does not address the problem10:18
ddaabecause the branch URL contains the uptsream project name10:18
ddaaand anyway, it's unclear whether packaging branches belong in upstream projects at all.10:19
mptWhy does the branch URL contain the upstream project name?10:19
ddaaBecause that's how we designed it.10:19
ddaa~owner/project/name10:20
mptWhy?10:20
mptCould you have ~owner/project and ~owner/name coexisting?10:20
ddaaThat would be problematic.10:20
mptLike /distribution and /project do?10:20
ddaaI do not think that would be impossible, actually I think maybe we should do it.10:20
ddaathumper disagrees with me on this.10:20
ddaahe thinks the current naming is fine and consistent10:21
ddaabtw10:21
LaserJockbut what if you *do* want /project/name ?10:21
ddaawe do have sort of ~owner/name in addition to ~owner/product/name10:21
mptcode.launchpad.net/~owner/project could still list all owner's branches of project10:21
ddaaexcept it is spelled ~owner/+junk/name10:21
mptJust those URLs wouldn't have project in them any more10:21
ddaahu?10:22
ddaanot making sense10:22
ddaaI understood you as ~owner/name was a branch10:22
mptyes10:22
ddaaso it would show a branch, not a list of branches10:22
mptyes10:22
mptbut ~owner/project would be a list of owner's branches for that project10:22
ddaaoh right10:23
ddaaI agree with you10:23
ddaaabout making +junk disappear10:23
ddaayou need to convince thumper10:23
ddaaand sabdfl to allow those branches to be team-owned10:23
mptI don't know what teams have to do with this issue10:24
mpt(which is not the same as "I don't think teams have anything to do with this issue" -- honestly, I don't know how teams work w.r.t. branches)10:24
ddaawe almost had to do a sit-in to get +junk branches out of sabdfl in the first place10:24
ddaawhat they have to do:10:25
ddaa"Team shall not have +junk branches"10:25
ddaawe have an open bug about closing a couple of place where we still allow this to happen.10:25
ddaaThe reason is "When you need a team to work on a branch, you really need a project."10:25
LaserJockthat seems quite irrational to me10:26
ddaaLaserJock: that what the boss says.10:26
LaserJockbut I'm just a lackey ;-)10:26
ddaaI'm just being a diligent engineer.10:26
LaserJockagain, it seems to me that that leads to junk projects being made instead of junk branches10:26
ddaathat's the motivation for +junk branches in the first place10:27
=== mayeco [n=mayeco@200.75.192.12] has left #launchpad []
ddaastop people from putting branches that have no project in the wrong place, or from creating pointless project.10:27
ddaaby giving them an easier path10:27
LaserJockright, but he's forcing teams to act differently than individuals10:27
LaserJockand tying them to projects10:28
ddaaactually, if that was only up to the boss, there would not be +junk branch to start with.10:28
ddaait's the engineers who insisted on it.10:28
LaserJockthank goodness10:28
LaserJock;-)10:28
mptddaa, not everything is a grand battle10:28
ddaawell10:28
ddaathat one episode was10:29
=== stub [n=stub@ppp-58.8.5.12.revip2.asianet.co.th] has joined #launchpad
ddaa"do not want" "do want" "do not want" "okay, let's call them junk so people won't like them" "okay we've got a compromise"10:29
ddaaI think I should stop this discussion now.10:30
ddaaAnd go for dinner.10:31
mptYes.10:31
norsettoanyone here that can migrate my pgp keys to my dogfood account?10:35
=== who_cares [n=cameron@71-12-166-197.dhcp.gwnt.ga.charter.com] has joined #launchpad
ubotuNew bug: #134362 in launchpad-answers "Email from any user should reopen an expired question" [Undecided,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/13436210:40
=== effie_jayx [n=valles@ubuntu/member/effie-jayx] has joined #launchpad
=== danilos [n=danilo@adsl-236-193.eunet.yu] has joined #launchpad
=== never|mobi [n=neversfe@82.113.106.1] has joined #launchpad
thumpermpt: the branch naming scheme is to reduce naming clashes10:46
thumpermpt: there use to be a +branch in there10:46
thumpermpt: which got removed as it served no useful purpose10:47
thumpermpt: however if you want branches and projects to share a namespace then there is a problem10:47
thumpermpt: there will be many more branches than projects10:47
thumpermpt: and what happens if I have a branch called "foo"10:47
thumpermpt: and later, someone registers a project called "foo"10:47
thumpermpt: should the project name be disallowed due to someone somewhere having a branch called "foo"10:48
thumpermpt: and if the project was allowed, how then to traverse to the branch?10:48
thumpermpt: this is why I think we need the current scheme10:48
=== effie_jayx [n=valles@ubuntu/member/effie-jayx] has joined #launchpad
ddaathumper: it's not a real problem10:51
thumperddaa: oh? why?10:51
ddaait's only a problem when the user that has that branch called "foo" wants to create a branch in the project "foo"10:51
=== Gwaihir [n=Gwaihir@ubuntu/member/gwaihir] has joined #launchpad
ddaaSo it's entirely user-local. It's not a case of individual users polluting a global namespace.10:52
ddaathumper: see what I mean?10:52
thumperhmm10:52
thumperyes10:52
thumperI see what you mean10:52
=== thumper is thinking
ddaaAlready had that in mind the last time we discussed it.10:52
ddaaI thought you realized that too.10:53
ddaaWhen things get tricky10:53
ddaais when a project is renamed10:53
thumperok, it could be done, but what is the driving advantage?  The removal of +junk?10:54
ddaaYes.10:54
thumperhow then would a pushed branch know its project?10:55
thumperbzr push bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~me/foo ?10:55
ddaaif foo is a project, that fails10:55
thumperbut if it isn't?10:55
ddaaif foo is not a project that creates a branch with name=foo, project=None.10:55
thumperthat's crack10:55
ddaaThat the logical conclusion.10:55
thumperanother reason why I don't like it10:56
seb128why is a project required anyway?10:56
seb128why can't somebody or a team store random code there?10:56
ddaato make it easier to find related branches10:56
thumperddaa: it becomes a much bigger problem when thinking of shared repos10:57
thumperinitial push10:57
thumperet al10:57
ddaathumper: I am starting to believe that shared repos is a much bigger problem than you think.10:57
=== ubotu [n=ubotu@ubuntu/bot/ubotu] has joined #launchpad
ddaathumper: not a discussion to have now10:58
ddaathumper: we need to understand better how shared repos will work10:58
ddaaI have a hunch that we're not going to escape the need for an explicit SharedRepo object in our model.10:58
thumperwhile I think it is feasible, it is a not right now10:58
ddaaThen things like that become less problematic.10:59
thumperddaa: there are much more interesting things to implement that redesigning how the branch traversal works10:59
thumperddaa: I don't want to spend too much time right now trying to address it10:59
ddaathumper: the reason we got there was that seb128 was asking for it.10:59
thumpersure11:00
ddaarather insistently.11:00
=== norsetto [n=norsetto@host115-2-dynamic.10-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it] has left #launchpad []
thumperseb128: feasible but not now11:00
thumper:)11:00
ddaaGood night.11:01
=== WebMaven [n=webmaven@nv-65-173-67-149.dhcp.embarqhsd.net] has joined #launchpad
seb128thumper: well, which means launchpad code is not usable now for Ubuntu packaging 11:10
=== ianm_ [n=yella@168.226.176.161] has joined #launchpad
thumperseb128: there are plans afoot to address packing, but it is a work in progress11:11
ianm_how does one get a new project into launchpad?11:12
seb128can I read about those plans somewhere?11:12
kikothumper, hopefully it's not going to take too long, though, because seb128's success is related to bzr's success11:12
kikoianm_, launchpad.net/projects/+new11:12
ianm_seems that should be a big button on the home page no?11:12
kikoianm_, what project are you interested in creating?11:12
kikoianm_, there /is/ a big button there -- Register. :)11:12
ianm_is that for projects?  I thought it was for accounts and I'm already registered11:13
=== who_cares [n=cameron@71-12-166-197.dhcp.gwnt.ga.charter.com] has joined #launchpad
Seveaskiko, can I ask you some questions about translations?11:14
thumperseb128: not just yet11:14
kikoSeveas, you can, and I might even answer them. :)11:14
kikoianm_, it's for projects. good point.11:14
Seveaskiko, excellent :)11:14
Seveaskiko, what's the average waiting time for a translation import? And do all .po files have to be checked, also ones that I upload in eg. a month?11:15
kikoSeveas, the time should go down dramatically now that we have per-product queues.11:16
kikoSeveas, it shouldn't be more than 24h on average11:16
kikoSeveas, only the first po file upload is checked, I believe -- subsequent ones aren't.11:16
Seveasmine's 26h now ;)11:17
Seveasare .po files checked even if a .pot is there?11:17
kikoI think it depends if the path is inferrable or not.11:17
kikothe best person to answer would be carlos or danilo tomorrow morning11:17
Seveasok11:17
Seveasthanks for the answers!11:18
kikoSeveas, you're welcome. please let me know tomorrow if you still need better answers.11:19
ianm_kiko: can I use launchpad for version control?  right now it's in some random SVN hosted by a friend11:19
ianm_kiko: nm I'm FAQing around11:22
=== helix84 [n=a@adsl-dyn107.91-127-42.t-com.sk] has joined #launchpad
kikoianm_, sure you can -- use bzr!11:22
=== amduser [n=amduser@134.173.68.52] has joined #launchpad
=== gmb [n=gmb@i-83-67-5-113.freedom2surf.net] has joined #launchpad
ianm_is the link for the second FAQ correct?  https://bugs.launchpad.net/faq11:26
ianm_it says "To find out how ..." but it links to a list of bugs11:26
mptGoooooooooooooooooood morning Launchpadders!11:30
kikompt awakes!11:30
kikompt, can you check the faq issue above?11:30
ianm_weird, so editing a project has a few extra options over creating it?  (did I miss the 'Bugs are tracked:' section before??)11:32
ianm_do I need an admin to import from SVN or can I do it myself?11:33
mptkiko, that's pre-1.0 bong11:34
kikompt, can we fix it? :-(11:35
mptyep11:35
kikoianm_, there are a lot of options you can edit after creating -- you're welcome to explore.11:35
mptlaunchpad.net/bazaar -> code.launchpad.net11:35
kikoianm_, you can register the import location for your trunk series and we'll get it imported11:35
mptThis is an example of developers treating the FAQ as a junk drawer11:35
mpt</hobbyhorse>11:36
kikothanks matsubara 11:37
matsubarakiko: np11:38
kikompt, do the filenames @@/locked pagerror.gif and refresh.gif ring a bell?11:39
mpt /@@/locked does, the others don't11:40
kikompt, it's a 404.11:40
kikois it an old page?11:40
mptYes, I thought I removed all occurrences of it11:40
mptNo, "/@@/" means "the image called"11:41
kikoit might just be old links11:41
mptgrep -r, why have you forsaken me11:41
mptIt would be odd for people to link to the icon specifically11:41
mptunless they're hotlinking it from some other site11:42
kikompt, I think the issue is cached CSS -- that could be it, right?11:42
kikolook at https://devpad.canonical.com/~jamesh/oops.cgi/2007-08-23/A1175 for instance.11:42
kikohah11:43
kikompt, http://webhost.math.rochester.edu/webworkdocs/discuss/msgReader$389511:43
ianm_so does launchpad use blueprints INSTEAD OF bugs of type "feature request" ?11:43
=== AlexLatchford [n=alex@82-44-193-109.cable.ubr07.haye.blueyonder.co.uk] has joined #launchpad
mptkiko, the page listed as HTTP_REFERER in that page does not use that icon11:44
kikompt, I know11:44
kikompt, could it be CSS-referred?11:44
kikoianm_, it depends. for larger changes where you think a document is a good way of expressing and discussing the change, a blueprint is a good idea.11:44
kikoianm_, the truth is that the line between feature and bug is somewhat tenuous11:44
mptkiko, it's not mentioned in the style sheet either.11:45
kikompt, could be a cached CSS file, then.11:45
kikothanks.11:45
=== gmb [n=gmb@i-83-67-5-113.freedom2surf.net] has joined #launchpad
kikogmb!11:45
mptisn't CSS caching solved yet?11:45
mptyes it is11:45
mpt@import url(https://launchpad.net/+icing/rev118/+style-slimmer.css)11:46
ubotuNew bug: #134372 in launchpad-bazaar "Bazaar hosting FAQ links to completely the wrong place" [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/13437211:46
bdmurrayWhat was the procedure for bug spam?11:46
bdmurrayhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/10787411:46
ubotuLaunchpad bug 107874 in rhythmbox "Can't add songs to librarey" [Low,Invalid]   - Assigned to Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs)11:46
gmbkiko!11:46
kikompt, yeah, but it wasn't earlier today, so that might be it. I landed the definitive fix earlier today, btw.11:47
mptkiko, so I don't see how it could have been cached either. Unless it was something weird like a Web archive saved with the HTML+CSS but without the images.11:47
mptah11:47
mptok11:47
kikogmb, how's it going? stopping by to see the flames? :)11:47
kikogmb, did we fix the issue with trac watches that was uncovered this week?11:47
mptkiko, The Wayback Machine might cause errors of that sort, if people were trying to see what a bug report looked like before it was marked private :-)11:47
kikoyeah11:47
kikogood point11:47
mptor the Google Cache, more realistically11:47
kikobut not 200+ 404s :)11:47
gmbkiko: This is the part where you tell me you're joking or referring to something I just don't get in my sleep-deprived state, right?11:48
=== gmb *begs*
kikogmb, I'm not joking but ask me about it tomorrow :)11:48
kikono begging!11:48
mptbdmurray, first "ask" a "question" at <https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad>11:49
mptreporting the comment11:49
gmbkiko: Okay, I will... 11:49
mptbdmurray, then, nag the Launchpad developers to implement a "Report as inappropriate" function for bug comments :-)11:50
mpt(cf. bug 1734)11:50
ubotuLaunchpad bug 1734 in malone "Need ability to mark bug comments as obsolete" [Wishlist,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/173411:50
bdmurraympt: hmm, that seems like a lot of work11:51
mptbdmurray, yes, we have some work to do to handle that better11:52
RinchenI can just picture it now. Bug comment rating.  *sigh*12:08
Rinchenbarry, ^^12:09
Rinchen:-)12:09
barryRinchen: hah12:10
=== ..[topic/#launchpad:Rinchen] : Launchpad - https://launchpad.net/ | Current version: 1.1.8 | Next developer meeting: Thu 30 Aug 2007, 1400UTC (wiki:MeetingAgenda) | launchpad-users@lists.canonical.com (wiki:MailingLists) | Launchpad help: https://help.launchpad.net | Channel logs: http://tinyurl.com/72w39
=== never|mobi [n=neversfe@82.113.121.1] has joined #launchpad
=== samiam [n=samurai@74-134-144-215.dhcp.insightbb.com] has joined #launchpad
ianm_kiko: so I put in the current SVN URL.  is it just a matter of time now or do I need to do anything else?12:19
=== superm1 [n=superm1@ubuntu/member/superm1] has joined #launchpad
kikoianm_, just a matter of time. what's the project's URL?12:37
ianm_kiko: http://gnomecoder.wordpress.com/luz I guess12:37
ianm_kiko: I plan to do everything I can in launchpad12:38
kikoianm_, I mean the project in launchpad?12:38
ianm_kiko: oh sorry, that would be https://launchpad.net/luz/12:40

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!