[01:20] ok i am out for today ... good night! === asac_the_2nd [n=asac@d112132.adsl.hansenet.de] has left #ubuntu-mozillateam [] === tonyyarusso [n=anthony@ubuntu/member/tonyyarusso] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === JenFraggle [n=jen@91.84.43.217] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === Paddy_EIRE [n=patrick@89.240.243.205] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [10:26] damn ... getting up at 7 to visit public offices isn't fun if you went to bed at 3am :) === bluekuja [n=andrea@ubuntu/member/bluekuja] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [11:01] asac: :) [11:01] hey [11:02] how is life going around here? [11:02] did the police take your drivers license :) [11:02] ? [11:02] lol [11:02] for me things are fine. [11:03] I was lucky they didnt find me [11:03] :P [11:03] anyway everything went fine [11:04] asac: did you see this mail: [11:04] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/motu-council/2007-August/000314.html [11:04] this make me crazy === tonyyarusso [n=anthony@ubuntu/member/tonyyarusso] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [11:05] asac: usually ppl on august leave for vacation [11:05] so does not do any activity [11:05] but maybe it's not clear for everyone [11:06] well ... he cannot know [11:06] so he shouldnt talk [11:06] we usually don't do much holiday [11:06] yeah, because you're one of the project managers [11:07] and you follows mozilla directly [11:07] i don't see anything offending in it [11:07] really [11:07] its just that so many people vanish and just stop [11:07] that its a valid question to ask [11:07] in my opinion he loves to talk too much [11:08] I never put any word in others stuff [11:08] keybuk is a reasonable person ... everybody has his weaknes though [11:08] I speak only for me and for open discussions [11:08] asac: he was scottk [11:08] ah [11:08] ok [11:08] sorry misread [11:09] asac: he did it already with: [11:09] well just answer and get over it ... its a public mailing list so nobody can really stop others from posting things [11:10] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/motu-council/2007-July/000240.html [11:10] and [11:10] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/motu-council/2007-July/000244.html [11:10] yeah ... but he has no word ... some people just want to be over-critical [11:11] yeah, but you know how I'm done [11:11] I get crazy when I see stuff like that [11:11] you cannot prevent technical hybris people to be in a project [11:11] true thing [11:11] think about this as a challenge ... you really have to learn how real life is [11:11] ye, nice hint [11:12] I hope this will end up in a good way [11:12] too many noise [11:12] there are always people that are assholes or want to piss at you ... the average in ubuntu is on top of the world though [11:12] yes ... i cannot tell why this noise happened ... i think its because you peered with a lot of people in the past [11:13] yea [11:13] only because a +0.5 [11:13] and if peer with lots of people chances are high that you bump into someone who has an attitude that isn't really what you want [11:14] yeah ... which wasn't good as well ... i mean ... i think matt (or someone) asked to give clear + 1 or -1 ... and then he answered well "i give 0.5" [11:14] yea [11:14] a bit childish ... either he should stand up to his opinion and give a -1 [11:14] or a +1 [11:14] in fact [11:14] he had no motivation for a -1 [11:14] he asked me in pm [11:15] maybe he hat ... but didn't have the guts to publicly state his opinion [11:15] to have lionel's mail [11:15] s/hat/had/ [11:15] with his response, lionel sent a +1 [11:15] so he had no more chance [11:15] but he gave a +0.5 after 1 month of inactivity [11:17] I don't more mind about this really [11:18] i would just answer to that mail with "i was on vacation" ... and get back to normal life [11:19] a friend sent a mail already [11:19] :) [11:19] when I was away [11:20] then its already clarified ... no need to put time into answering his email [11:20] just ignore it then [11:20] yea [11:21] asac: I will finish vacations on this sunday [11:21] then I restart school [11:21] and I will have really less time to be here [11:21] but I guess one hour per day [11:22] thats good [11:22] yea, at least I can check/answer mails [11:22] fix bugs on my packages [11:23] and nothing more [11:23] how is your new relationship going? [11:24] asac: is not going good with the new gf [11:24] ^^ [11:24] lol [11:24] you had the same idea [11:24] and I posted a msg about it just before you [11:24] :D [11:24] hmm ... i am sorry ... but you are young ... so plenty of time to find the right one [11:24] hehe [11:24] yeah funny [11:25] yeah [11:25] but I hope everything will return to its right placer [11:25] *place [11:25] you will see ... there are times of dark ... and times that are bright [11:26] yeah true, you have tons of experience [11:26] at some point you will wonder "why the hell is everything going so well" [11:26] lol [11:26] I hope it will happen [11:27] bluekuja: school ... last year? [11:28] asac: should be last year [11:28] :/ [11:28] got some problems this year [11:28] e.g I stopped to study [11:29] not really stopped [11:29] but I didnt want to spend hours on books [11:29] a great error [11:30] now I'm 18 and will have 2 more years of school [11:30] damn me [11:32] asac: you know, when you're young, you love to spend time with friends et all instead of books hehe :) [11:34] yes i know [11:35] i didn't do anything at home ... anyway i managed to be one of the best [11:35] the trick is: use the time you are in school [11:35] contribute to classes ... [11:35] yeah [11:36] that's important [11:36] the time in school is wasted otherwise ... and chatting with friends during classes isn't really that great either [11:36] lol [11:36] chatting with friends is really common here [11:36] better do a lot of things in school ... you won't need to do homework then [11:37] bluekuja: its common everywhere [11:37] yup [11:37] you can even do it ... but contribute to the classes ... listen ... try to find it interesting ... then learning is much easier [11:38] its not easy ... but being able to find something interesting even though its boring is really a great advantage [11:39] ok working on something ;) [11:39] asac: have fun :) I'm leaving for the sea [11:39] will be back on sunday [11:40] (sunday --> vacations end) [11:40] take care alex [11:40] ;) [11:40] everything under code tag in your LP home page is borked (your == im sure everyone but atleast for me this happens) [11:40] gnomefreak, huh? [11:41] bluekuja: yeah ... just one more thing about school: there is a way to be good in school but still be the coolest guy in your class [11:41] :) [11:41] asac: :D [11:41] you're a pro man [11:41] :) [11:41] bluekuja: go to your code tag in LP than click on one of the branches it will oops [11:41] gnomefreak: they probably roll-out a new lp build [11:42] asac: i just asked if it was known but yes that is most likely the cause [11:42] gnomefreak, yup [11:42] confirmed here [11:43] gnomefreak, is for build build 4759 [11:43] out this night [11:44] 22-23 august [11:44] huh? [11:44] with ppa support [11:44] et all [11:44] bluekuja: where do you see that its out this night? [11:44] asac: was reading a friend's blog [11:44] who follows it [11:44] url? [11:44] asac: is italian [11:44] :) [11:44] italian planet [11:45] http://planet.ubuntu-it.org/ [11:45] first post [11:45] maybe rewell posted a mail [11:46] in launchpad beta testers [11:46] I forget to check mail [11:46] gnomefreak: do you see personal package archives in mozillateam? [11:46] but I guess that's it [11:46] gnomefreak: https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam [11:46] i won't see it as i am not admin afaik [11:47] asac: who is dfarning? [11:47] asac: yes its called active personal package archive [11:47] bluekuja: dfarning became ubuntu-member and then just left and was never seen again [11:47] oh^^ [11:47] bluekuja: e.g. just to show you that things that scottk claims really happen [11:48] yeah [11:48] gnomefreak: please set one up for us then [11:48] cool ... on ~asac i can see it as well [11:48] nice [11:48] asac: yeah [11:49] is for everyone [11:49] I tested it on beta [11:49] before [11:49] and it rocks [11:49] yes ... i know ... wasn't sure if its all set up alrady [11:49] it builds packages for amd64 and i386 [11:49] hmmmmmmm [11:50] gnomefreak, ? [11:50] i think the https://help.launchpad.net/PPAQuickStart is still outdated as it still refers to beta et al [11:50] asac: what would sound good for an explaination for it [11:51] mozillateam testing/preview and bleeding-edge packages :) [11:51] k [11:51] asac: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/launchpad-users/2007-August/001998.html [11:51] gnomefreak: we can change description later ;) [11:52] https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive [11:52] bluekuja: hmm so its still beta? [11:52] asac: yup [11:52] gnomefreak: ok ... we just have to remember not to upload anything that we don't have a bzr branch [11:52] because it might be wiped at some point [11:53] I think every team member [11:53] will be notified [11:53] with uploads [11:53] asac: you'll receive an ACCEPTED mail [11:53] bluekuja: yeah ... lets see how it works out [11:53] as alwais [11:53] gnomefreak: wanna try? [11:53] yes i will [11:53] push -trunk ? [11:54] :D [11:54] asac: is it up to date [11:54] Ubulette: is your branch in a decent state or shall we cherry-pick things to mozillateam branch and upload that to ppa ? [11:54] Ubulette: trunk branch [11:55] gnomefreak: let me see if Ubulette pushed something to mt branch [11:55] yesterady [11:55] oh code.lp.net is broken :) [11:55] i cant see them [11:55] asac: read above :) [11:55] yeah... now i see the point ;) [11:56] gnomefreak: ok ... lets push something small to test [11:56] https://code.launchpad.net/~fta/nspr/nspr.ubuntu.trunk [11:57] gnomefreak: http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tarballs/ ... tarballs are there [11:58] ok give me a few [11:58] branching still works ... apparently only web-frontend is broken [11:59] asac: I think package removal is active now [11:59] e.g removing a package inside a ppa archive [11:59] gnomefreak: maybe fix version ... append ~mt1 ... and target for gutsy for now [11:59] bluekuja: yeah ... good to know ;) [11:59] yup [11:59] ) [11:59] :) [11:59] at least one can wipe broken things [11:59] is this tarball set to use bzr-build? [11:59] yup [11:59] yes [11:59] damn [12:00] k [12:00] :D [12:00] just branch ... fix changelog (commit) [12:00] asac: how is weather there? [12:00] 20 degree ... partly cloudy ... in short: semi-sucks [12:00] I went to cracow and bratislava some days ago [12:00] and was pretty good [12:00] here is bad [12:01] raining now [12:01] :/ [12:01] yeah ... cracow is poland nowadays [12:01] yup [12:01] they are not that close to the see ... so they have dryer summer ... and colder winters [12:01] s/see/sea/ [12:01] I'll come to hamburg [12:01] so we can meet up [12:01] bratislava is slovakai? [12:01] yup [12:02] ok ... how is the city? [12:02] worth visiting? [12:02] central part of the city is really nice (old castle et all), other parts sux (people have no money there) [12:02] wanted to go to prague at some point ... but maybe thats already too mainstream and so i consider bratislava [12:03] yeah ... just want to look at the old central city [12:03] that's nice [12:03] the [12:03] *then [12:03] :) [12:03] prague rocks too much [12:03] I went there 2 years ago [12:03] well ... i think i will do both [12:03] maybe one can stay longer in prague [12:04] just have been there switching trains ... [12:04] asac: I was talking with a slovakian friend about money/month for works there [12:04] yeah probably 500 EUR if you are lucky :) [12:04] 300 euroes [12:04] *euros [12:04] per month [12:04] yes ... thats less [12:05] it's nothing [12:05] however if you have 1k you can probably live pretty well there [12:05] while you would die here [12:05] yup [12:05] anyway stay longer in prague [12:05] it's the best [12:05] go to romania ... they have even less [12:05] yup [12:05] asac: girls there are the nicest ever [12:06] right ;) [12:06] though its dangerous that way :) [12:06] yup [12:06] asac: Step 4: As there is no override system, you have to upload you package to the right/desired component. In debian/control, use this syntax Section: universe/devel. does that mean i have to use universe/devel? or can i use anything [12:06] gnomefreak, use every section [12:06] you assume is good [12:06] e.g universe/sound [12:06] just use that syntax [12:07] gnomefreak: no idea where nspr belongs to [12:07] so it has to be universe? [12:07] maybe look what apt-cache show shows you [12:07] gnomefreak: probably [12:07] gnomefreak, yea [12:07] asac: libs [12:07] though unsure [12:07] ok [12:07] it doesnt matter [12:07] gnomefreak: you can try [12:07] gnomefreak: but stick to universe for mozillateam packages [12:07] i don't want to pretend that they are suppported ;) [12:08] gnomefreak: what does howto say ... how to upload? dput ... dupload ? [12:09] asac: dput [12:09] or dupload [12:09] same [12:09] for ppa [12:09] dput i think [12:09] yes was just curious what is named in howto [12:09] got no name [12:09] they say "upload" [12:09] ok [12:09] so you have to use your personal uploader [12:09] I guess [12:09] right [12:10] bluekuja: is upload through anonymous ftp ... or authenticated ssh/sftp ? [12:11] asac: mm [12:11] I really don't know [12:11] bluekuja: how did you upload? [12:11] I added a new host on dput.cf [12:11] (you told you tested on dogfood) [12:11] and pushed [12:12] bluekuja: you still have the dput.cf entry? [12:12] yea [12:12] i guess its anonymous ftp if you don't know though [12:12] [ppa] [12:12] fqdn = upload.dogfood.launchpad.net [12:12] incoming = ~bluekuja/ubuntu/ [12:12] login = anonymous [12:12] anonymous [12:12] yea [12:12] :) [12:13] asac: I'm leaving [12:13] gnomefreak: good thing is that you can push with distribution "dapper" -> it will be build for dapper ... [12:13] yup [12:13] bluekuja: ok bye [12:13] cu [12:13] asac: cu on sunday! [12:13] have fun with ppa [12:13] :) [12:14] gnomefreak: you can take the above dput entry and adapt it [12:14] asac: UNRELEASED; change that to? [12:14] e.g. s/bluekuja/mozillateam/ [12:14] gnomefreak: thats the distribution i was talking about [12:14] so if the package is ment for gutsy ... use gutsy [12:14] feisty ... feisty [12:14] k [12:14] and so on [12:14] lets build nspr for gutsy though [12:15] gnomefreak: append ~mt1 to the version ubulette choose [12:15] then commit changelog with: debian/changelog: upload of version XXXX to gutsy ppa [12:16] however lets wait for Ubulette to tell us if its ok to push to mt branch [12:16] but i think it its [12:17] gnomefreak: is there a way so we can recover what was in the old archive? [12:17] that entry is wrong [12:17] asac: no [12:17] e.g. all the dapper packages we did once? [12:17] damn [12:17] not a big problem because so far 1.5.0.x security maintenance appears to work out well [12:18] gnomefreak: which entry is wrong? [12:18] 12:12 < bluekuja> [ppa] [12:18] 12:12 < bluekuja> fqdn = upload.dogfood.launchpad.net [12:18] 12:12 < bluekuja> incoming = ~bluekuja/ubuntu/ [12:18] 12:12 < bluekuja> login = anonymous [12:18] 12:12 < bluekuja> anonymous [12:18] that one? [12:18] ups [12:18] its just [12:18] 12:18 < asac> 12:12 < bluekuja> [ppa] [12:18] 12:18 < asac> 12:12 < bluekuja> fqdn = upload.dogfood.launchpad.net [12:18] 12:18 < asac> 12:12 < bluekuja> incoming = ~bluekuja/ubuntu/ [12:18] 12:18 < asac> 12:12 < bluekuja> login = anonymous [12:18] gnomefreak: but i think the server is different now [12:19] it is that is why i said the entry is wrong [12:19] im looking for correct info [12:19] ok fine === asac_the_2nd [n=asac@80.171.112.132] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [12:22] ppa.launchpad.net is where you upload [12:22] ok thanks [12:22] atleas that is how i see it [12:22] yeah ... just try [12:23] you probably cannot do anything seriously wrong [12:23] otherwise its a bug in ppa [12:25] asac: do you have command for bzr bd to sign and just build source? [12:25] yes [12:25] bzr bd --merge --builder='debuild -S -sa' [12:25] (personally i use dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -S -sa' [12:26] ) [12:26] but debuild should be better [12:26] gnomefreak: if its not you in changelog you have to provide -k as well [12:26] bzr bd --merge --builder='debuild -S -sa -kgnomefreak' [12:27] bzr bd --merge --dont-purge --builder='dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -S -sa -k3C1C3C2A' . [12:27] this bcm43xx wifi chip is stable as well ... the stress test is still running ... 6GB traffic through WPA2 ... just using network-manager [12:28] gnomefreak: looks good [12:28] gnomefreak: you can provide your email as well instead of your keyid [12:28] we shall see brb need more tea [12:28] basically if it shows up with [12:28] gpg --list-keys gnomefreak [12:28] oh wtf [12:28] then you can just use gnomefreak [12:28] i can just use -kasac@d [12:28] or -k asac@debian.org [12:29] as long as list-keys has a distinct match with what you provide as -k ... it should work [12:29] it doesnt matter its already failed [12:30] like? [12:30] http://pastebin.mozilla.org/188439 [12:30] looks like tarball [12:30] but i could be off [12:31] yes ... be sure the tarball is in tarballs [12:31] next to your branch [12:31] did you download it? [12:31] Looking for ../tarballs/nspr-trunk_4.7.0~cvs20070713.orig.tar.gz [12:31] that should exist [12:32] http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tarballs/ [12:32] oh i think i forgot the s on tarballs [12:32] hehe [12:33] nope [12:33] well the tiny details that bite us day in day out [12:33] thats fine [12:33] if you are in branch [12:33] does [12:33] ls ../tarballs/nspr-trunk_4.7.0~cvs20070713.orig.tar.gz [12:33] show up the tarball? [12:34] i know i put it in there [12:35] gnomefreak@GutsyGibbon:~/nspr/tarballs$ ls [12:35] nspr-trunk_4.7.0~cvs20070713.orig.tar.gz [12:35] what is nspr? [12:35] just a dir ... or the branch? [12:35] just a fir [12:35] dir === jeromeg [n=jerome@gra94-2-82-66-142-60.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [12:35] so im not building it in my home dir [12:35] well .. try the ls in the branch [12:35] ls in the branch? [12:36] you cd in the branch [12:36] then try ls as above [12:36] (12:33:23 PM) asac_the_2nd: ls ../tarballs/nspr-trunk_4.7.0~cvs20070713.orig.tar.gz [12:36] gnomefreak@GutsyGibbon:~/nspr/work/nspr.ubuntu.trunk$ ../tarballs/nspr-trunk_4.7.0~cvs20070713.orig.tar.gz [12:36] bash: ../tarballs/nspr-trunk_4.7.0~cvs20070713.orig.tar.gz: No such file or directory [12:36] yes [12:36] you are too deep [12:36] do you see that? [12:36] work? [12:36] you need the branch next to the tarballs dir [12:36] ah ok [12:36] ;) [12:37] hello [12:37] hi [12:38] jeromeg: how did it work out? [12:38] asac_the_2nd: i builded the package without the patch [12:38] you just left without letting us know [12:38] i put tarballs outside of work and it should go inside it [12:38] asac_the_2nd: yep I was borred cause I had forgot to debuild -S -sa ... [12:38] gnomefreak: i have all my branches in ~/ubuntu_bzr/ [12:38] asac_the_2nd: but the bug is still here without the patch [12:39] and a tarballs like ~/ubuntu_bzr/tarballs/ [12:39] gnomefreak: so either move your branch one level up ... or move tarballs one level down (inside worK) [12:39] jeromeg: strange [12:39] i did already let me work on this other error now [12:39] jeromeg: you still have the build-tree ? [12:40] asac_the_2nd: yep [12:40] please go to build-tree/mozilla [12:40] and post output of: quilt applied [12:41] in fact I don't know exactly what you mean by build-tree [12:41] I build with pbuilde [12:41] rr [12:41] well is your pbuilder chroot wiped now? [12:42] then you cannot look ... build tree is the source tree after the build has finished [12:42] I think it's automatically cleaned after each build [12:42] to keep it clean [12:42] yes ... then we cannot look ;) [12:42] for testing you should pass the option to not delete it after build [12:42] I've just commented the patch in debian/patches/series [12:42] or don't buld in pbuilder at all [12:42] debuild -S -sa [12:43] and build [12:43] and test [12:43] yes ... but i want to double check ... as the patch is almost certainly the problem [12:43] asac_the_2nd: I can give you the .deb or .dsc ? [12:43] jeromeg ... the diff.gz [12:44] asac_the_2nd: ok I'll put everything on line [12:44] jeromeg: i just need the diff.gz and the dsc+changes [12:45] jeromeg: i think we forgot to drop bz343360-feed-flat-chrome-fix.patch [12:46] asac_the_2nd: http://vv.guelf.free.fr/ubuntu/firefox/ [12:46] sorry for that [12:46] i was confused by my own confusing patch naming [12:46] I think I dropped this one [12:46] going to check [12:47] +flat-chrome-fix.patch [12:47] then thats the missing? [12:48] ok I should have dropped the two patches ? [12:48] no idea ... i am testing now [12:49] I can do it if you want [12:49] I have some time [12:50] yes maybe try to drop that as well [12:50] ok [12:50] i'm on it [12:50] at best keep your pbuilder so you can later test more easily [12:50] e.g. without a rebuild [12:50] ok [12:51] jeromeg: while you build [12:52] please clean error console in firefox (Tools -> Error Console) [12:52] then reproduce the bug [12:52] and see what shows up there [12:52] please post it [12:52] here or to the bug report ? [12:52] for now here [12:53] jeromeg: in the error there should be a link to the source line that failed [12:53] when you click on it you should get there [12:53] maybe post that as well (e.g. -5 + 5 lines [12:53] ok [12:53] but please to pastebin :) [12:55] yep === Paddy_EIRE [n=patrick@89.240.243.205] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [01:00] asac_the_2nd: I was thinking, after that do you want me to test with only the second patch dropped ? [01:01] no ... both [01:02] asac_the_2nd: how will dput decide to upload to PPA instead of revu. ~/.dput.cf isnt used for revu but ther eis a dput config that has revu as default [01:02] actually i hope that the first patch can be applied in the end ... but to track down we can drop both [01:02] dput NAME file.changes [01:02] e.g. NAME == ppa [01:02] or whatever you put i [] brackets in dput.cf === Paddy_EIRE [n=patrick@89.240.243.205] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [01:04] Uploading to ubuntu (via ftp to upload.ubuntu.com): [01:05] but i dont understand why it didnt default to revu since the main dput config file has revu as default [01:06] well it says it was uploaded [01:07] waiting for LP page to update with this info to see if it is correct [01:07] thought it should have used ppa.launchpad.net instead of uload.ubuntu.com [01:09] yeah [01:10] shouldn't do any harm ... as your key is not in the MOTU/main keyring yet === gnomefre1k [n=gnomefre@adsl-144-142-136.rmo.bellsouth.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [01:19] asac_the_2nd: http://pastebin.com/m4f5568a9 [01:22] yes its still the same [01:22] maybe dropping the other patch fixes it [01:22] otherwise i would have to look more closeyly ... .e.g where is the shorthand 'Cc' defined? [01:23] why isn't it defined for us [01:25] ok [01:26] can I do anything else ? [01:26] wait till the build finishes for now [01:26] if the build tree is still there we can take a closer look [01:30] ok [01:38] i hate dput now [01:39] asac: it seems with ppa.launch[ad.net when using dput it uploads it to ubuntu archive [01:39] i asked in #launchpad waiting for answer on why [01:41] wierd [01:42] changing the ppa.lp.net to dogfood it tells me its already been uploaded === gnomefreak getting pissed with this now [01:42] * "upload.dogfood.launchpad.net" becomes "ppa.launchpad.net". [01:43] gnomefreak: hey its hot ... its beta ... dont be pissed. Lets be happy that ppa will work soonish :) ... i am out for lunch though :) ... catching the a bit sun available atm. [01:43] so i assumed it was correct [01:43] asac: have fun [01:43] gnomefreak: thanks let me know what #launchpad answers [01:43] maybe its correct? [01:43] dont know what i pasted was from lp list though [01:48] asac: seems to be a bug [02:13] asac: ok looks like its uploaded but LP hasnt refreshed the team ppa page nor the build page [02:14] oh and once PPA is stable it will drop all packages that are uploaded atm [02:14] i also have a personal PPA ;) [02:17] yah [02:22] ill be back a bit later have some things to attend to [02:25] asac : bad news, still doesn't work with the two patches dropped [02:28] crazy [02:29] maybe the patch has to be modified ? [02:31] the packages/dsc/diff/changes are at the same adress [02:36] jeromeg: no ... its completely open to me why this happens then [02:37] please try something [02:37] let me look it up first though [02:38] jeromeg: where was your error paste? [02:38] nm ... found it [02:39] jeromeg: can you please open error console ... clear (so you see what happens) [02:39] and then in the textbox put: [02:39] Components.classes["@mozilla.org/browser/shell-service;1"] .getService(Components.interfaces.nsIShellService_MOZILLA_1_8_BRANCH) [02:39] and hit return ... or press evaluate [02:39] what happens? [02:40] jeromeg: is it still the same error at all now? [02:41] I'm having a look [02:42] asac : same error message [02:44] ok try above [02:45] an error message results [02:45] you should get [xpconnect wrapped nsIShell...] [02:45] as output [02:45] but it won't let me copy it [02:45] are you sure you didn't miss a thing? [02:46] e.g. a typo or something? [02:46] let me try [02:46] doesn't seem to be a typo [02:47] yes [02:47] i see it as well [02:47] the error message ? [02:48] yes ... that the shell service component doesn't exist somehow [02:48] it could explain the bug ? [02:48] for sure [02:49] do you want me to do something else , [02:49] ? [02:50] no ... just post to the bug that the @mozilla.org/browser/shell-service;1 apparently is not resolvable and copy the statement above ... say that it fails [02:51] ok [02:51] and I add the first error message or no ? [02:53] yes thats good as well [02:54] jeromeg: when i get an idea whatelse it might be i will let you know [02:55] asac_the_2nd: ok thx for your help [02:59] asac_the_2nd: is that ok : bug 131743 ? [02:59] Launchpad bug 131743 in liferea "liferea-add-feed does nothing in firefox" [Low,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/131743 [03:06] jeromeg: "Thank you for your bug report. I can reproduce this, I'm marking this as triaged." [03:06] --> triaged would mean that we already have an evaluation on how to fix the problem [03:06] :) [03:07] asac : this was for the liferea bug [03:07] interesting the triaged state was dropped [03:08] stupid me ... got confused by new interface [03:08] asac : then I put liferea to Invalid as it was a problem with firefox, and added a firefox bug task [03:08] right [03:08] asac : ah ok :) [03:08] but liferea isn't invalid :) [03:08] atm [03:08] there is a second target (on top) [03:08] fixed [03:09] jeromeg: fix the upstream bug as well [03:09] aeh invalidate i mean ;) [03:09] asac : yeah ok, as it had been invalidated upstream I thought it would be automatic [03:09] ah [03:09] no idea [03:09] :) [03:10] i did it explicitly now [03:10] sorry for confusion ;) [03:10] no problem [03:10] I got to go now [03:10] see you [03:10] cu [03:10] stay tuned [03:10] jeromeg: ^^ [03:10] ok [03:10] bye [03:11] byze [03:11] *bye [03:12] gnomefreak: ppa still broken? [03:12] i guess we have to wait until ppa dev returns [03:12] asac: not sure i got reject email so im trying to fix it atm [03:12] gnomefreak: what does reject tell you? [03:12] asac: we are talking about it in #launchpad [03:12] k [03:13] asac: tells me cant find mozillateam in Lp but i think i have a clue [03:13] i am not in there ... and i better keep it that way ... I already get soaked in too much discussions [03:13] gnomefreak: clue ... good news ;) [03:14] i will let you know if i fix it [03:15] thanks ... i will not look in the channel for an hour or so ;) ... i have to get something done [03:19] thats fine it may be a while before i know if it works anyway [03:40] ok think i figured it out with a bit of help uploaded once again lets see how it goes :) [03:52] asac: https://dogfood.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive [03:52] they are building binaries atm use view build records to see them [03:58] gnomefreak: rock ... do the same for nss :) [03:59] k but you know next week we will have to redo everything [04:01] ok i need links for nss not for tar but for the bzr files [04:01] look at ~fta code.lp.net [04:01] there is nss-trunk [04:02] gnomefreak: ok forgot that it is so soon [04:02] @schedule berlin [04:03] Schedule for Europe/Berlin: 23 Aug 17:00: Ubuntu Development Team | 24 Aug 14:00: MOTU Team | 27 Aug 17:00: Screencast Team | 28 Aug 17:00: Ubuntu Server Team meeting | 28 Aug 21:00: Technical Board | 29 Aug 22:00: Edubuntu === gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === asac_ [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === hjmf [n=hjmf@7.Red-83-44-173.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === shirish [n=shirish@59.95.23.61] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [06:27] hey guys, what's up? [06:48] Ubulette: you up m8? === cwong1_ [i=chatzill@nat/intel/x-9402adf2db353f17] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === shirish [n=shirish@59.95.23.61] has left #ubuntu-mozillateam ["Leaving."] === JenFraggle [n=jen@91.84.43.217] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === asac_the_2n1 [n=asac@e177174234.adsl.alicedsl.de] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [07:42] asac_the_2n1: nss and nspr are complete what else did you want up therE? [07:42] gnomefreak: well for now ... just those ... and maybe try a thunderbird 2.0 backport for feisty [07:42] :) [07:43] asac: one problem with that [07:43] i am not sure if we had standalone nss/nspr in our preview archive though [07:43] can we mix feisty and gutsy for same repo? [07:43] we did [07:44] if not we need to make another team for feisty === gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [07:52] i cant keep a frigging connection :( [07:54] although what we could do is use my personal PPA for feisty, i can try to build the new nss nspr that we just did for gutsy on feisty(if possible) than build tbird2 off that unless you have better idea [08:07] gnomefreak: no we can [08:07] its not mixing [08:07] the apt archive can deal with multiple distributions [08:07] (at least from what i know) [08:10] if all else fails ask :) [08:11] ill let you know the outcome === Ubulette_ [n=Ubulette@APuteaux-153-1-96-79.w86-217.abo.wanadoo.fr] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [08:14] hmm, was i talking alone ? [08:16] i didnt see you talking [08:21] asac: ok tbird2 for feisty built on what version of nss nspr? [08:21] hi [08:21] oh, you experimented ppa [08:21] great [08:21] and with nss/nspr :) [08:21] there's a flaw though... [08:21] i need to rename both source pkgs as src endup in universe, and debs in main [08:21] * Disconnected (Connection timed out). [08:22] too bad ppa are limited to i386 and amd64 :( === Ubulette_ is now known as Ubulette [08:22] the names would need to be changed if officially released but not as of now [08:22] look at the ppa, it's already messed up [08:23] Ubulette: it will be more important for next week since the uploads to PPA will be gone when PPA is released [08:23] Ubulette: im looking at it what is wrong with it? [08:24] https://dogfood.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive [08:24] hmmmmm [08:24] why did debs end up in main [08:24] there's main and universe [08:25] i guess it's because of the name [08:25] i doubt it [08:25] how would name do it [08:26] i see it [08:26] i forgot to add universe/libs to the binaries when i changed it for source [08:26] Source: nspr-trunk [08:26] Section: universe/libs [08:26] ackage: libnspr4-0d [08:26] Section: libs [08:27] oh [08:27] fixing it now [08:29] Hi Ubulette [08:29] asac_the_2n1, hi [08:30] is the main / universe thing fixed now? [08:30] i see them in universe [08:32] btw, mozilla bug 393281 is a wontfix [08:33] Mozilla bug 393281 in HTML: Parser "blank page when visiting a page with a syntax error in it" [Normal,Resolved: wontfix] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393281 [08:34] asac: it will bewhen im done [08:34] Ubulette: yes ... appears to be non-trivial [08:35] don't really care about this page, it's broken anyway. [08:36] :) [08:36] went there as it's the "Seine" river crossing paris that overflowed (?) every century [08:36] last time was in 1910.. and it's raining everyday [08:37] getting close to the next flood... [08:43] well seine appears to be a really quite river then [08:45] at the moment, yes ;) [08:46] do you want me to push my nss/nspr trees to m-t ? [08:50] Ubulette: have i really been such a moron to push those branches to firefox instead of nspr and nss projects? [08:50] oh i haven't pushed them at alll ... yes please do [08:50] ok [08:51] what name should I give them ? [08:51] i renamed all my branches as it was a mess [08:51] just ubuntu.trunk ? === gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [08:51] common practice is not to repeat the project name in the branch name [08:52] this is getting old [08:52] anyway nspr fix is uploading [08:52] so nspr.ubuntu.trunk is redundant because its maintained in the nspr project anyway [08:52] would be nice to have project name as a 1st column on lp code. [08:52] same for nss [08:52] right ... for the way ubuntu uses it that might be better [08:52] I know that but read the whole page.. you'll end up with several ubuntu.trunk [08:52] why do you come up with this stuff after i upload [08:52] but lp is designed for upstream projects as well ... which probably use a more distinct name [08:53] gnomefreak: he? [08:54] name not being right for what i can tell (i was disconnected for the first half) [08:54] gnomefreak: we could say that the upload today was an upload and deserves a changelog entry ... however, since it gets wiped anyway from ppa next week, we still have the option to just keep branch open without checkpointing the changelog entry [08:54] correct [08:54] gnomefreak: Ubulette wasn't here today when we did the upload [08:54] gnomefreak: if you want your changelog entry in, you could push as well [08:54] i am fine with any way ;) [08:54] i had to add changelog entries [08:55] that wasnt a choice i had [08:55] ? [08:55] gnomefreak: you had to target the then topmost entry [08:55] it was still set to UNRELEASED [08:55] why did had to add anything ? [08:55] oh [08:55] i set them both to gutsy i thought [08:55] yes you should have just documented all in the currentl UNRELEASED changelog entry ... which exists to fill it up during development [08:56] ppa is not supposed to end up in gutsy, right ? [08:56] then on upload you close that dev cycle by committing it with distribution you upload to [08:56] Ubulette: what do you mean? [08:56] it's just populating a personal repo [08:56] yes [08:56] asac: that would have worked with first upload but none after that [08:56] gnomefreak: yes right [08:56] or maybe it would have worked [08:56] too late now that can be fixed next week [08:56] you would have to remove the .upload file and hope that launchpad didn't see the last upload [08:57] this week is pretty much play with it and see it work [08:57] yes ... so letss just push Ubulette's branch ... then do it proper next week ;) [08:57] right [08:57] e.g. add all changelog info ... target, commit upload [08:57] Ubulette: so just push your branches ;) [08:58] to mt [08:58] i wanted to get rid of -trunk in src name (as it's not used in deb names)... [08:58] code [08:58] Ubulette: thats a bad idea [08:58] Ubulette: it will finally prevent us to have two versions in the archive at the same time [08:58] current state is bad anyway [08:58] current state isnt bad afaict [08:58] what is bad about it [08:59] yes ... in fact its pretty good ... you can just upgrade to new libnspr and ffox2 still work [08:59] section doesn't matter. better version will be prefered, no ? [08:59] what is better? [08:59] higher? [08:59] y [08:59] then yes. [09:00] until we upload to real universe this isn't a big problem ... isn't it? [09:00] right [09:00] and then we can maybe trick apt by just using a lower version :) [09:00] everything atm are little changes to make nothing big [09:00] and making firefox-trunk/paradiso directly depend on that lib with = [09:01] hmm [09:01] Ubulette: no idea if apt-get will downgrade the lib though when you explicitly install firefox-granparadiso [09:01] but i thin it will [09:01] only open point is how gnome-app-insatll will behave [09:01] will it always remove paradiso? [09:01] on each and every upgrade? [09:01] thats an open point to figure out [09:02] shit [09:03] oh nevermind [09:03] I really think it's too early for next week. [09:03] not really it works fairly well [09:04] Ubulette: what is too early for next week? what happens next week? [09:04] so far, it seems ff2 and ff3 are happy, what about other stuff using those two ? [09:04] Ubulette: new libnspr and libnss should not break abi as you know :) [09:04] otherwise its upstream grave bug we should communicate [09:04] fairly well == as expected [09:04] gnomefreak: what did you test? [09:05] asac: what did i test? [09:05] 21:03 < gnomefreak> not really it works fairly well [09:05] 21:04 < gnomefreak> fairly well == as expected [09:05] PPA [09:05] ah [09:05] though it was a tribe thing... maybe not [09:05] t [09:05] thought [09:06] what has tribe todo with what we try in ppa ? [09:06] or do you mean we should upload trunk packages for real next week already? [09:08] they are uploaded waiting for build to start [09:08] ppa is okay as it's isolated anyway (now and later too). tribe is different, i think we're not ready for system nss/nspr in ff or ff-gp [09:08] needs to be tested 1st [09:09] as moz guys will probably get mad at us if we do that for ff2 [09:10] -as+and [09:11] Ubulette: right ... needs evaluation + discussion [09:11] but in ppa we can do initial evaluation and see how it works out [09:12] Ubulette: we use system nss/nspr for firefox2 already (but maybe i just misread) [09:13] yes but not cvstag ones [09:13] i mean, e use released ones [09:13] we [09:13] right ... but universe is something unsupported and if users only get that when the explicitly want paradiso then this might be okay [09:14] given that after removing paradiso all cleansup automatically [09:14] but i see the point [09:14] and i am at least as concerned about that as you are ;) [09:14] (i hope) [09:14] :) [09:21] hmm, ftbs for trunk today. === gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [09:21] hmm, ftbs for trunk today. [09:21] bz390451_master_password_lost.patch has been rejected. Seems committed, at last :) [09:21] I'll give it a try [09:22] hmmmmm they dont even have a source tarball for 2.0 [09:24] ? [09:25] asac_the_2n1: why doesnt mozilla release source tarballs with nightlys? [09:26] I do :) [09:27] how do you make a source tarball without the source [09:27] need upstream source to make upstream source tarball [09:27] I fetch cvs [09:27] ah that is one way === gnomefreak forgot how much i hate cvs [09:44] yeah [09:44] better don't look back [09:44] you will run away in tears === Paddy_EIRE [n=patrick@89.240.243.205] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [09:47] asac, did you open a bug for installer_shouldnt_skip_strip_if_disable_strip_configured ? [09:50] where? [09:50] upstream? [09:50] no i wanted to submit a good patch right upon opening the bug [09:54] feel free :) === shirish [n=shirish@59.95.23.61] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [10:21] Ubulette: any update on today's build & do you guys have that PPA now? [10:22] hi [10:22] hmm, ftbs for trunk today. [10:22] bz390451_master_password_lost.patch has been rejected. Seems committed, at last :) [10:22] rebuilding now [10:22] lol === shirish [n=shirish@59.95.23.61] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === shirish [n=shirish@59.95.23.61] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === shirish [n=shirish@59.95.23.61] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [10:51] asac, asac_the_2n1 Ubulette anybody has any idea when today's build would be out? === shirish sorry for that in & out, pidgin had been behaving very strangely today, so now on xchat. [10:52] 2nd try: [10:52] hmm, ftbs for trunk today. [10:52] bz390451_master_password_lost.patch has been rejected. Seems committed, at last :) [10:52] rebuilding now [10:52] should be done soon [10:53] shirish, got my answer for pidgin ? [10:53] Ubulette, yup about the monotone, I had played with monotone [10:54] the only problem or stuff is you need to make a database before, a little bit of groundwork, not too hard but also not so easy for noobs [10:54] in that respect svn is very noob-friendly. [10:56] as i said, it's not something my bot is ready for. maybe later [10:56] I'll think about it but if it's only for 1 project, I'm not sure [10:57] btw, I've modify my mini dists, ddebs are now fully integrated [10:57] -y+ied [10:57] Ubulette,: understood, would be looking forward for that, it would be very nice if it also understood montone :) [10:57] ah, cool [10:58] trunk built.. pushing to repo [10:58] 3.0a8pre+cvs20070823t1203+bbot === ubotu [n=ubotu@ubuntu/bot/ubotu] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [10:59] Ubulette: thanx [11:01] done in 3562 sec [11:01] woow. 1h [11:03] wtf adium is not in the repos, isn't it one of the good ones (multi-protocol IM) apart from pidgin? [11:04] ubotu Adium [11:04] Sorry, I don't know anything about adium - try searching on http://bots.ubuntulinux.nl/factoids.cgi === bnovc [n=bnovc@64.22.118.221] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [11:08] bah, me bad it seems Adium is a good IM but only for Macs :( [11:08] lol [11:09] http://www.adiumx.com/blog/2007/05/pidgin-200.php [11:10] there is also centericq but the interface isn't appealing at all, guess have to struggle on pidgin in reduced functionality way as well as on xchat [11:11] i kind of like xchat [11:11] looking for an irc or aim client [11:12] bnovc: looking for multi-protocol IM client, like pidgin, pidgin has been behaving badly after some updates [11:12] shirish: i see. what kind of problems in pidgin? [11:12] bnovc, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pidgin/+bug/134347 [11:12] Launchpad bug 134347 in pidgin "[Gutsy] pidgin doesn't shutdown gracefully" [Undecided,New] [11:13] as well as https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pidgin/+bug/134366 mores serious than the other. [11:13] Launchpad bug 134366 in pidgin "[Gutsy] Pidgin freezes" [Undecided,New] [11:13] shirish: why would one shutdown pidgin? [11:13] ok [11:13] asac: shutdown as in quit I meant [11:13] for me it works well [11:13] should be protocol specific [11:13] have you tried to not use some protocols to see? [11:13] or maybe you have some spurious extension enabled? [11:14] asac: no all by the book, I did do pidgin-dbgsym maybe that could be the reason? [11:14] pidgin works really well for me [11:14] asac: sorry i kind of disappeared after asking about helping earlier this week, got more busy than i expected but will try to contribute something this wkend [11:15] no problem :) [11:15] do as much as you can do [11:15] does installing -dbgsym make the application more heavier (in a sense they get called all the time) or only when one uses gdb or something like that? [11:15] not more ... otherwise your contribution is more likely to not last long :) [11:16] asac: any ideas? [11:16] ... howevr .. some contribution is needed to let you feel the fun of all this ;) [11:17] shirish: only when you run with debug [11:17] shirish: its not that the mozillla is build with --enable-debug ... which would make things slower as more checks are performed and debug output is dumped to console [11:17] but with just dbgsym installed ... shouldn't make a difference [11:18] asac: then have no idea, both these bugs were happening before but as a one off thing, but now consistently. :( [11:19] maybe just coincident [11:19] asac: the pidgin --d I did deliberately so could catch whatever was happening, after it didn't respond 3-4 times in a same/similar fashion. Then used -d flag/swithc [11:19] switch [11:20] i really have no idea about pidgin [11:20] only thing i can say is that you should try to disable all extensions you use [11:20] and if that doesn't help try t disable accounts until you find the problem [11:21] asac: will try, maybe i can isolate the problem area, but not right now, its 3 a.m. maybe tomorrow morning with a strong cup of chai/tea ;) [11:21] take care everybody, asac Ubulette bnovc === shirish out === shirish [n=shirish@59.95.23.61] has left #ubuntu-mozillateam ["Leaving"] === AlexLatchford [n=alex@82-44-193-109.cable.ubr07.haye.blueyonder.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [12:29] Ubulette: still awake? [12:30] asac_the_2n1: just wondered if you managed to do a simple make install with trunk xulrunner ... so we can evaluate upstreams intentions [12:42] with trunk ? not yet [12:50] ok [01:11] in fact, i can as i've already prepared both the chroot and orig.tgz [01:14] Ubulette: just take a glance how the structure produced by current upstream make install looks like ... so not even a to really package it ;)