[01:28] <Ubulette> asac, would be nice if we could create a real xulrunner-1.8.1 for 1.8.1.6 so that other apps (like totem, epiphany, liferea) could try the glue way instead of depending on firefox(-dev)
[01:29] <Ubulette> a good test could be totem-plugin compiled with xulrunner-1.8.1 == 1.8.1.6 and running in GP compiled with xulrunner-1.9 == 1.9a7
[01:35] <Jazzva> asac: I have to go now... I've been trying to look for some other solution and the only one that I can think of now is to provide those strings in ubufox.properties, or to look for where are they located...
[01:35] <Jazzva> asac: I'm still confused why it throws an exception if it doesn't find a string, when it should just return a null :/...
[01:36] <Jazzva> Ok, good night, everybody'
[01:36] <Jazzva> .../day/morning/afternoon :)...
[02:52] <asac_the_2n1> Jazzva|away: it throws an exception because the contract is that it throws an exception ... you are probably expected to test explicitly upfront if the key is available.
[02:52] <asac_the_2n1> and just not try to get the string at all if its not available
[02:53] <asac_the_2n1> Ubulette: why can't we make the test by building totem against 1.9 ?
[02:53] <asac_the_2n1> and other plugins?
[02:54] <Ubulette> we can test the here but I'm not sure seb will adopt xul 1.9beta for totem
[02:55] <Ubulette> -the+that
[02:56] <Ubulette> on my side, I'll test the all-trunk combo
[02:56] <Ubulette> totem/nss/nspr/xul
[02:57] <Ubulette> totem/nss/nspr/xul/ff
[02:58] <Ubulette> I already have trunk versions of totem/ff/nss, nearly xul. remains nspr
[02:58] <Ubulette> which is easy
[10:27] <gnomefreak> !easysource
[10:27] <ubotu> source-o-matic is a webpage where you can (re)generate your sources.list - http://www.ubuntu-nl.org/source-o-matic
[10:27] <gnomefreak> asac_the_2n1: are you here yet?
[10:34] <gnomefreak> its still a bit early for him
[10:34] <gnomefreak> cant say early since its 10:30am give or take but early for him (its also weekend)
[10:35] <tonyyarusso> What is the purpose of "        if [ -d mozilla ] ; then rm -rf mozilla; fi
[10:35] <tonyyarusso> in the clean rule?
[10:35] <gnomefreak> remove empty dir?
[10:36] <gnomefreak> oh no that maybe to remove the mozilla folder that gets created when building
[10:36] <tonyyarusso> It seems to be happening before I'm done using it though
[10:37] <gnomefreak> are you using bzr bd to build it
[10:37] <tonyyarusso> No.
[10:38] <gnomefreak> than it should be there after you build/FTBFS than it would get cleaned upon next build try or if you run fakeroot debian/rules clean
[10:39] <gnomefreak> most of the mozilla apps we have once build fails ther eis a way to test it without clean being ran but i dont know when or what it is
[10:39] <tonyyarusso> hmm
[10:39] <tonyyarusso> Let me see if I can pinpoint that as my problem
[10:40] <gnomefreak> ok this damn patch is wayyyyyyyyy too frigging long
[10:42] <gnomefreak> ok by the looks of it that patch isnt calling it. wher ein the hell does it say to use sunbird.cf
[10:42] <gnomefreak> sunbird.cfg
[11:02] <tonyyarusso> gnomefreak: btw, I'm getting "gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found" when using pbuilder, even though I made the key on this machine and it shows up in gpg --list-public-keys yarusso
[11:03] <gnomefreak> tonyyarusso: i get that sometimes using dpkg-buildpackage
[11:03] <tonyyarusso> gnomefreak: any idea why?
[11:03] <gnomefreak> but only once in a while depending on the package
[11:03] <gnomefreak> not really :(
[11:03] <tonyyarusso> Weird
[11:03] <tonyyarusso> Any problem caused by it?
[11:03] <gnomefreak> debian/build-tools/obscure-tool debian/sunbird.cfg.source debian/sunbird.cfg
[11:04] <gnomefreak> tonyyarusso: no just doesnt sign, says it fails but build doesnt fail afaik just the sig.
[11:04] <tonyyarusso> hrm
[11:06] <tonyyarusso> whew, for the first time I actually got to the building stage
[11:06] <gnomefreak> i think i found the issue, asac_the_2n1 could the issue with the sunbird.cfg not being touched due to debian/build-tools/obscure.c  having firefox in it instead of sunbird?
[11:07] <gnomefreak> although it looks like a comment
[11:08] <gnomefreak> hard to tell i dont remember how to comment in C
[11:09] <gnomefreak> ok looks like /* commment */ but what is the "some text"
[11:10] <gnomefreak> that has to be it, YAY i think i found issue.
[11:21] <gnomefreak> test building with this change hopefully it works
[11:31] <asac> hie
[11:32] <asac> gnomefreak: firefox in sunbird.cfg?
[11:32] <asac> what do u mean?
[11:32] <gnomefreak> hold on ill show you the line
[11:32] <asac> and yes if .cfg is not properly processed the problem coulb e there
[11:33] <gnomefreak> static char doc[]  =
[11:33] <gnomefreak> "obscure #1 -- a program shift a firefox configuration file by 'obscure_value'";
[11:33] <gnomefreak> i changed firefox to sunbird and its building atm
[11:38] <gnomefreak> asac: can you go to http://www.mtas.es/insht/en/legislation/epi_en.htm and let me know if the index Regulations Legislation and legal tests open for you
[11:39] <gnomefreak> i guess it is more of a java script issue more so than firefox
[11:40] <gnomefreak> checking iceape atm
[11:40] <asac>  ==> "obscure #1 -- a program shift a firefox configuration file by 'obscure_value'";
[11:40] <asac> thats just a comment and will change nothing
[11:41] <gnomefreak> i wasnt sure if " was a comment in C i do remember */ */ as comments
[11:41] <asac> hmm
[11:42] <asac> no its definitly something that is just a comment ... or probably a string that is printed on --help
[11:42] <asac> actually i doubt that the problem is the obscuring ... you could try to use unobscured file
[11:42] <asac> and and obscure value of 0
[11:43] <gnomefreak> its been so long since i have delt with C directly
[11:43] <gnomefreak> ah debian/rules sent me to that file
[11:43] <gnomefreak> done; gcc -o debian/build-tools/obscure-tool debian/build-tools/obscure.c; \ debian/build-tools/obscure-tool debian/sunbird.cfg.source debian/sunbird.cfg
[11:44] <gnomefreak> thats why i went there
[11:45] <gnomefreak> thats under pre-build:: section in rules
[11:45] <gnomefreak> that and clean are the only 2 sections that have sunbird.cfg
[11:46] <asac> gnomefreak: that all looks fine
[11:47] <asac> gnomefreak: its just creating and obscured version of the .cfg.source file
[11:47] <asac> gnomefreak: its important that the general.config.obscure_value configuration is set to 13 (or something else i don't remember that is different from 0)
[11:49] <asac> gnomefreak: can you verify that it iS set to something that is not 0 ?
[11:49] <asac> in sunbird config editor
[11:51] <gnomefreak> yep looking
[11:52] <gnomefreak> its 13
[11:53] <gnomefreak> i did see something that caught my eye
[11:54] <asac> ok
[11:54] <asac> i will be out for a few hours soon ... will do wellness today :)
[11:54] <asac> like doing sport ... then taking a steambath and going in sauna
[11:54] <gnomefreak> give me a sec to type this
[11:55] <asac> sure
[11:56] <gnomefreak> config.use_system_prefs == false and config.use_system_prefs.accessibility == false
[11:56] <gnomefreak> in about:config
[11:56] <asac> how are those values set in firefox?
[11:56] <gnomefreak> looking
[11:57] <gnomefreak> damn
[11:57] <gnomefreak> both false in ff
[11:57] <asac> yeah
[11:57] <asac> its strange ... indeed
[11:58] <gnomefreak> i still think its somehting stupid that is right infront of our faces
[11:59] <asac> yeah ... but probably this is on the things that is indirectly in front of your faces .... which you will see once you know why :) ... but not before :/
[11:59] <asac> s/your/our/
[12:00] <gnomefreak> true
[12:01] <gnomefreak> im trying not to patch this since it should be done with .cfg
[12:04] <gnomefreak> asac: btw stgraber is online atm i fyou have time to ping him
[12:20] <asac> ok going to sport now
[12:22] <gnomefreak> have fun
[02:19] <Jazzva> asac: Alive? I was wrong last night... The strings we need to get from chrome://mozapps/locale/plugins/plugins.properites are there... The one that are used in pluginInstallerWizard.xul are in chrome://mozapps/locale/plugins/plugins.dtd. I'll try to first fetch the string from that file, and then from our. Then it should throw the exception when we try to fetch a string that's in our file.
[02:31] <Jazzva> Yep... it does that...
[02:42] <Jazzva> asac: It's fixed now. Go exception catching :). Anyhow, I've noticed something else. If you select to install a plugin, and then cancel the installation outside of FF, the FF will report that the plugin is installed...
[03:01] <Jazzva> asac: I pushed the new revision to my branch :). BTW, rev 40 and 41 are related to removal of hard-coded "Get Ubuntu Addons" and replacing it with string "Get Ubuntu Extensions" in ubufox.dtd
[03:06] <Jazzva> BTW, I think you should merge... The last revision that's the same in both branches is num 38. I made those string changes before your rev 39, and I forgot to merge before this submission...
[03:13] <Jazzva> I'm off now... Exam time :)... See you in the evening.
[04:13] <asac> hmm exception catching was not really the way it ment it :)
[05:28] <gnomefreak> asac: Please restart any running Sunbirdes should be Please restart any running Sunbirds
[05:32] <gnomefreak> ill add that to my to do list for sunbird
[05:33] <asac_> gnomefreak: well ... please open a bug
[05:33] <asac_> and mark it critical
[05:33] <asac_> its critical somehow
[05:33] <gnomefreak> oh it is?
[05:33] <asac_> and we should target it for beta
[05:33] <asac_> well ... if there is an update button and it tries to upgrade then its critical ... yes.
[05:34] <asac_> gnomefreak: do we have the same issue with thunderbird?
[05:34] <asac_> that would even be more critical
[05:34] <gnomefreak> thunderbird doesnt give the update option
[05:34] <gnomefreak> and i was talking about the spelling error with the please restart running sunbirds
[05:41] <asac> gnomefreak: ok ...
[05:41] <asac> i was offline before so maybe i missed that you were not talking about the upgrade option anymore :)
[05:41] <asac> gnomefreak: have we received any regression report since yesterdays tbird security roll-out?
[05:41] <gnomefreak> 11:28 <      gnomefreak > asac: Please restart any running Sunbirdes should be  Please restart any running Sunbirds
[05:42] <gnomefreak> asac: not that i know of
[05:42] <asac> gnomefreak: yeah ... is sunbird release branchin mt?
[05:42] <gnomefreak> i think so
[05:42] <asac> if so feel free to fix it after opening up the branch by committing a new changelog entry eith UNRELEASED distribution
[05:42] <gnomefreak> mine and mt are the same atm
[05:43] <gnomefreak> unreleased
[05:43] <gnomefreak> ?
[05:43] <asac> ok ... let me look at code for sunbird project
[05:43] <asac> ubotu: how is launchpad going ? down?
[05:43] <ubotu> I'll remember that, asac
[05:43] <asac> ouch
[05:43] <gnomefreak> lol
[05:43] <gnomefreak> bug 1
[05:43] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 1 in ubuntu "Microsoft has a majority market share" [Critical,In progress]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/1
[05:43] <asac> why did he remember something?
[05:43] <gnomefreak> no LP is up
[05:44] <asac> last time he remembered something was when i started line with !
[05:44] <gnomefreak> !how is launchpad going
[05:44] <ubotu> But how already means something else!
[05:44] <gnomefreak> !how
[05:44] <ubotu> how is launchpad going ? down?
[05:44] <asac> rofl
[05:44] <asac> ;)
[05:44] <gnomefreak> !forget how
[05:44] <ubotu> I'll forget that, gnomefreak
[05:44] <gnomefreak> :)
[05:44] <asac> damn ... so this thing will remember things that i tell him
[05:44] <asac> not only with !
[05:45] <gnomefreak> yep
[05:45] <gnomefreak> depends on how you use it
[05:45] <gnomefreak> ubotu bug 1
[05:45] <ubotu> For help with Microsoft Windows, please visit ##windows or your nearest mental health institute. See http://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+bug/1 http://linux.oneandoneis2.org/LNW.htm and !equivalents
[05:45] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 1 in ubuntu "Microsoft has a majority market share" [Critical,In progress]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/1
[05:45] <asac> hmmm ... i tolk it to wake up some times
[05:45] <asac> !wake
[05:45] <ubotu> Sorry, I don't know anything about wake - try searching on http://bots.ubuntulinux.nl/factoids.cgi
[05:46] <gnomefreak> hmmmmm
[05:46] <gnomefreak> thats odd
[05:47] <gnomefreak> im in debian/sunbird/sunbird-restart-required.update-notifier and it doesnt have sunbirdes maybe dpkg is doing it
[05:48] <gnomefreak> Description: Sunbird has been upgraded (or reinstalled) and must be restarted. Please quit and restart your web browser now.
[05:48] <asac> gnomefreak: the text doesn't match at all right?
[05:49] <asac> there must be some other update-notifier in that beast
[05:49] <asac> which is maybe the cause why its so badly worded
[05:49] <gnomefreak> above is what is said in the file. following is what is said when installing sunbird
[05:49] <asac> gnomefreak: its not the update-notifier:
[05:49] <asac> asac@hector:~/ubuntu_bzr/sunbird.ubuntu.mt$ grep Sunbirdes debian/*
[05:49] <asac> debian/sunbird.postinst:echo "Please restart any running Sunbirdes, or you will experience problems."
[05:49] <gnomefreak> Please restart any running Sunbirdes, or you will experience problems.
[05:49] <asac> there it is
[05:50] <gnomefreak> fixed
[05:50] <asac> thanks ... hmm maybe we should think about dumping the text from update-notifiert to console as welll ...
[05:50] <asac> it would give us a single place to maintain ... and its even translated (currently only for -fr)
[05:51] <asac> not sure how to best do it from a technical pov though
[05:51] <gnomefreak> well in postinst it uses the file i stated above
[05:52] <asac> yes .. but not to get the text it echoes
[05:52] <asac> those are two different things ...
[05:52] <gnomefreak> good point
[05:52] <gnomefreak> than i say drop it, do we have it in anything else? ff or tb or icceape?
[05:52] <asac> probably everywhere
[05:53] <asac> sunbird was based on ffox-trunk which became firefox (stable) which then was forked in all kinds of directions
[05:53] <asac> among others sunbird came out of it
[05:53] <gnomefreak> true
[05:54] <asac> and you are right ... i am not really sure if we need a message to console at all
[05:54] <asac> there are other messages, but maybe those should be communicated to the user by producing such update-notification files on the flie
[05:55] <asac> most people use gnome-app-install and will hardly every see any console output from install
[05:55] <gnomefreak> very true
[05:55] <asac> like the compreg.dat detected message
[05:55] <asac> should be in postinst as well
[05:55] <gnomefreak> it is at the bottom i think
[05:55] <asac> we should still communicate that to users and i already asked me at some point how? ... but its obvious
[05:56] <asac> use notification files to produce a bubble
[05:56] <gnomefreak> like the lightbulb bubble
[05:56] <gnomefreak> ?
[05:57] <asac> well ... it will be the same that you get on upgrade notification ... iif we use the same mechanism
[05:57] <asac> not idea if its a lightbulb bubble
[05:57] <asac> but i think it its
[05:57] <asac> is
[05:57] <gnomefreak> ff is
[05:58] <asac> independent from that .... this upgrade notification isn't really a final solution
[05:58] <gnomefreak> asac: btw ther eis a bug on sunbird that it should be in office menu not internet
[05:58] <asac> yeah ... makes sense.
[05:58] <asac> lets change it and see if someone complains about that
[05:59] <gnomefreak> well if we pipe the output to term when using apt-get and GUI with the bubble that should be fine no?
[05:59] <asac> (other comment than just: i couldn't find it anymore ... which wouldn't really count)
[05:59] <gnomefreak> asac: just change network to office in the .desktop?
[05:59] <asac> gnomefreak: yes... but maybe the update notificatio ndaemon should be improved
[05:59] <asac> e.g. it could also send a broadcast to *all* terminals
[06:00] <gnomefreak> ko
[06:00] <gnomefreak> ok
[06:00] <asac> but for now lets go for the we spid out content from update notification on our own
[06:00] <asac> now its just open how to best get the right description
[06:01] <asac> e.g. at best we would get the french text when the user is running french desktop et al
[06:01] <asac> hopefully there is a tool to get description from .desktop file ... which is probably the same format as this update-notification file
[06:02] <asac> but i think -fr is wrong for that ... it would be Description[fr]  =...
[06:02] <asac> iirc
[06:02] <gnomefreak> Categories=Application;Network; replace network with office?
[06:03] <gnomefreak> Description-fr: is wrong?
[06:07] <asac> no idea ... maybe try if it works
[06:08] <asac> gnomefreak: look what openoffice has in its desktop file
[06:09] <Ubulette> hi
[06:10] <asac> ola
[06:11] <asac> Ubulette: from what i saw in code the static glue just looks for exactly the same version ...
[06:12] <asac> at least the check passes in the builds that have BUILD_ID as upper as well as lower bound
[06:12] <Ubulette> they don't read base of UUID or something like that ?
[06:12] <Ubulette> +a
[06:12] <asac> not sure if the matching algorithm knows about minor revisions or something though
[06:12] <Ubulette> well, i'll have a look
[06:12] <asac> Ubulette: base of UUID ? in what context?
[06:13] <asac> Ubulette: do you know where to find?
[06:13] <asac> its in xpcom/glue/
[06:13] <asac> search for BUILD_ID (or wsa it BUILDID)
[06:13] <asac> that should bring you to the place where the version check of what was found in /etc/gre.d is initiated
[06:14] <asac> actually i am not really sure what value build id has at that place ... maybe figure that out as well ... i hope its not the date you see during build
[06:14] <Ubulette> i was referring to "Almost all XPCOM functionality is exposed through interfaces, which are versioned using UUIDs. As functionality is completed, these interfaces and the contractIDs that allow access to components are frozen, which guarantees that they will not change in future releases."
[06:14] <asac> -DBUILD_ID=20070801
[06:14] <asac> or 0000000
[06:14] <asac> if you don't set MOZ_OFFICIAL_BUILD during build
[06:15] <asac> Ubulette: ah ok ... that would make sense
[06:15] <asac> Ubulette: anyway ... i just looked for the "find gre" algorithm
[06:15] <asac> they look at build id ... but maybe there is something else
[06:19] <Ubulette> i have to split xul in two debs. so far put everything in xulrunner-1.9_1.9a8pre~cvs20070824_i386.deb
[06:19] <asac> right ... we need devel
[06:20] <Ubulette> btw, nss and nspr are interchangeable
[06:20] <Ubulette> i mean, trunk and the gutsy ones
[06:20] <asac> yes ... thats good
[06:21] <asac> they are just not interchangable during build
[06:21] <Ubulette> oops, i mean "are not"
[06:21] <asac> ah
[06:21] <asac> ok
[06:21] <asac> well i could use trunk for firefox stable
[06:21] <asac> not being able to downgrade for gp makes sense though
[06:21] <asac> as it probably makes use of new features
[06:21] <Ubulette> xul 1.9 wanted symbols (in fact, #define) in nss that weren't catched by the nss check in configure
[06:22] <asac> or did you even had problems using trunk for stable ffox?
[06:22] <asac> yes ... which is reason why we had to package -trunk at al
[06:22] <asac> in paradiso 4 we could still use plain system nss
[06:22] <asac> nspr
[06:22] <asac> then it failed in paradiso and i dropped the use of system libs for that upload
[06:23] <asac> paradiso5
[06:23] <Ubulette> here, i've just used builddep libnspr4-dev (>= 4.7.0~cvs20070713) and libnss3-dev (>= 3.12.0~alpha1b)
[06:24] <Ubulette> which are the tagged ones
[06:24] <Ubulette> so even trunk of those two will match
[06:28] <Ubulette> btw, my branch for nss now builds trunk so if you want the tagged one, checkout the right commit
[06:32] <gnomefreak> asac: pushing postinst, changelog, and .desktop
[06:33] <gnomefreak> asac: https://code.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/sunbird/ubuntu-0.x
[06:47] <gnomefreak> asac: also bug 134746 i reported for the update being enabled
[06:47] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 134746 in lightning-sunbird "[Gutsy]  sunbird help>check for updates is enabled and shouldnt be." [Critical,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/134746
[06:49] <asac> Ubulette: what do you mean by tagged?
[06:49] <asac> versioned depend? on what?
[06:49] <gnomefreak> ill be gone for a while, im building sunbird with the changes to see if all is well
[06:50] <asac> gnomefreak: ok ... your last revision ... can you redo the changelog change and replace gutsy by UNRELEASED please?
[06:50] <gnomefreak> why unreleased?
[06:50] <asac> e.g. uncommit ... change, commit, push with --overwrite
[06:50] <asac> because its unreleased :)
[06:50] <asac> we flip this just before release
[06:50] <asac> so the changelog entry that flips that ... is always the released one
[06:50] <asac> indicates which revision goes up
[06:52] <gnomefreak> pushing it again
[06:59] <gnomefreak> i fucking hate this
[07:01] <gnomefreak> bzr: ERROR: Can't rename /srv/sm-ng/push-branches/00/00/13/32/.bzr/branch/lock/vk0vp57c4r.tmp to /srv/sm-ng/push-branches/00/00/13/32/.bzr/branch/lock/held: /srv/sm-ng/push-branches/00/00/13/32/.bzr/branch/lock/held already exists
[07:03] <gnomefreak> think i fixing it
[07:04] <gnomefreak> goes for smoke
[07:12] <Ubulette> gnomefreak, i've updated and pushed ff 3.0a8pre~cvs20070825 to m-t. feel free to ppa it :)
[07:13] <Ubulette> asac> Ubulette: what do you mean by tagged? => NSPR_HEAD_20070713 & NSS_3_12_ALPHA1B
[07:14] <gnomefreak> Ubulette: trunk or gp?
[07:14] <Ubulette> trunk
[07:15] <gnomefreak> k
[07:15] <Ubulette> you should have up to #59
[07:15] <gnomefreak> yep
[07:16] <gnomefreak> ok ill get to it sometime later im finishing up sunbird push than i am building it than ill play with trunk :)
[07:16] <gnomefreak> sometime during this i have to clean and go shopping
[07:19] <gnomefreak> bbs shower
[07:21] <asac> Ubulette: oh ... so you build real head?
[07:21] <asac> Ubulette: i doubt we really want that ;)
[07:21] <Ubulette> for what ?
[07:21] <asac> Ubulette: i am not even sure if NSS_3_12_xxx is from HEAD at all
[07:21] <asac> maybe it has its own branch?
[07:21] <asac> Ubulette: nspr/nss
[07:22] <Ubulette> i'm building head but that doesn't mean i want you guys to use that
[07:22] <asac> Ubulette: yeah ... does 3_12 has its own branch?
[07:23] <Ubulette> no, but it should
[07:23] <Ubulette> hmm
[07:23] <asac> well as long as there is no other dev branch then it doesn't need its branch
[07:23] <Ubulette> you mean in bzr ? or in upstream cvs ?
[07:23] <asac> upstream
[07:23] <Ubulette> no idea
[07:25] <asac> ok there is no branch
[07:25] <Ubulette> just a tag ?
[07:25] <asac> then building head makes sense ... if you want it ;)
[07:25] <asac> yes
[07:25] <Ubulette> good
[07:25] <asac> in case there were a tag HEAD would probably not be latest as i know that nss folks just develop on one branch at a time
[07:26] <asac> which is why i asked as i didn't want you to build something that isn't latest at all :)
[07:28] <asac> Ubulette: at what revision is trademarks.txt file in your HEAD NSS?
[07:28] <asac> mozilla/security/nss/trademarks.txt that is
[07:28] <asac> probably just 1.1 ;)
[07:29] <asac> nevermind
[07:29] <Ubulette> no rev inside
[07:29] <asac> ok i will be out soon ... drinking lots of bear ;)
[07:29] <asac> well beer ;)
[07:29] <Ubulette> lol
[07:29] <asac> i swear i didn't dring anything today :)
[07:30] <Ubulette> ;)
[09:09] <gnomefreak> Ubulette: any reason the binaries in debian/control are missing Section (on some of them) for -trunk?
[09:10] <Ubulette> hm, no reason.
[09:10] <Ubulette> I haven't touched that
[09:10] <gnomefreak> dom inspecter would be web or devel?
[09:12] <Ubulette> web
[09:12] <Ubulette> universe/web
[09:12] <gnomefreak> thought so ty
[09:19] <Ubulette> fyi, i'm building xulrunner-1.9-1.9a8pre~cvs20070824
[09:20] <Ubulette> should be close to ready
[09:20] <Ubulette> not sure how to push that. app is now xulrunner-1.9, not xulrunner
[10:08] <Jazzva> Evening...
[10:18] <Ubulette> Jazzva, Hi
[10:20] <Jazzva> Hello, Ubulette :)
[10:27] <Ubulette> gnomefreak, i've pushed #60 for trunk (updating a patch shared with xulrunner)
[10:56] <gnomefreak> all done updating?
[11:02] <Ubulette> #60 ?
[11:03] <gnomefreak> yes
[11:03] <gnomefreak> asac_the_2nd: are you lurking?
[11:03] <Ubulette> I think he's out
[11:03] <gnomefreak> did we add plugin finder to feisty?
 ok i will be out soon ... drinking lots of bear ;)
 well beer ;)
[11:06] <Ubulette> hmm, nspr is broken.. we need to install nspr.pc
[11:07] <gnomefreak> what version and is this from PPA?
[11:08] <Ubulette> nspr from my tree, so ppa too
[11:08] <gnomefreak> from what i gathered earlier you have your own nss nspr and than the ones you did for the team now in PPA plus there is the reg versions
[11:09] <Ubulette> mine and the ppa one should be the same, delta sections+changelog
[11:10] <Ubulette> except that I pushed yesterday a new nss, which is really nss-trunk (nss HEAD)
[11:10] <Ubulette> i should have created nss mt 1st..
[11:11] <Ubulette> hmm, i'll do jsut that
[11:11] <gnomefreak> let me know what you find ill most likely get to it tomorrow or during the week (my day is already getting long
[11:12] <Ubulette> ok
[11:13] <gnomefreak> i can change locally if something simple so i dont need to merge and than i can just push mt4 or whatever version im on
[11:13] <gnomefreak> sunbird might almost be done :)
[11:14] <Ubulette> ff-trunk is stable for now. tarball is on my site
[11:15] <gnomefreak> -trunk no need for tarball :)
[11:15] <gnomefreak> ./debian/rules neworig makes tarball
[11:16] <gnomefreak> from whatever date is in changelog as latest
[11:16] <Ubulette> well, that's broken
[11:17] <Ubulette> it should co 1st, then update changelog
[11:17] <Ubulette> i got caught twice already
[11:18] <Ubulette> maybe that's me, try it :)
[11:18] <gnomefreak> i already did
[11:18] <gnomefreak> only time you cant do it is when you are using bzr bd
[11:23] <Ubulette> maybe that's why.. i'm using bzr bd
[11:23] <gnomefreak> ok forgot i was doing this for PPA :(
[11:23] <gnomefreak> that would be why
[11:24] <Ubulette> lol
[11:26] <gnomefreak> sunbird is fixed now all i have to do is find the cause of the update button being enabled
[11:26] <gnomefreak> will see if i can get trunk done first
[11:28] <Ubulette> ok, i've created https://code.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/nss/nss.ubuntu.tag312a1b which is the one that should be used for granparadiso
[11:30] <gnomefreak> NOTE: to updaload to PPA we can not use UNRELEASED it has to be gutsy feisty ect....
[11:31] <gnomefreak> it automaticly builds and makes repo for the disto you use in changelog
[11:33] <Ubulette> could we drop nss-svn.debian.org.trunk ?
[11:34] <gnomefreak> havent seen it
[11:34] <Ubulette> i've created nss.ubuntu.trunk in m-t, i'll drop my own branch
[11:34] <Ubulette> this one is for ff-trunk
[11:34] <gnomefreak> ok ive been using nss.ubuntu.trunk
[11:34] <gnomefreak> for PPA
[11:35] <Ubulette> for ppa, use nss.ubuntu.tag312a1b (which was what you used for the ppa)
[11:36] <gnomefreak> no its not
[11:36] <Ubulette> ~mozillateam/nss.ubuntu.tag312a1b => PPA + GP (once will tell it to use system-nss)
[11:36] <Ubulette> it is
[11:36] <Ubulette> except you section changes
[11:36] <gnomefreak> unless you tagge dit after i finished the builds
[11:37] <gnomefreak> nspr.ubuntu.trunk  nss.ubuntu.trunk
[11:37] <Ubulette> i renamed one
[11:37] <Ubulette> check log. #12 is last for nss.ubuntu.tag312a1b
[11:38] <Ubulette> the -trunk one is now #14 with fresher sources
[11:40] <Ubulette> gnomefreak, dont use ~mozillateam/nss/nss.ubuntu.trunk for the ppa, use ~mozillateam/nss/nss.ubuntu.tag312a1b (which contains what was ~fta/nss/nss.ubuntu.trunk when you fetched it for the ppa)
[11:40] <Ubulette> forget about ~fta/nss
[11:40] <gnomefreak> Ubulette: give me a efw minutes
[11:46] <gnomefreak> are the tarballs the same?
[11:46] <Ubulette> yes
[11:47] <gnomefreak> nss for trunk is tag312a1b?
[11:47] <Ubulette> for trunk ?
[11:47] <gnomefreak> yes
[11:47] <Ubulette> ff trunk?
[11:47] <gnomefreak> for PPA
[11:47] <Ubulette> yes
[11:48] <gnomefreak> one that goes with ff-trunk
[11:48] <gnomefreak> what about nspr?
[11:48] <Ubulette> doesn"t matter for ff-trunk but as you can only build one, build the tagged one
[11:48] <Ubulette> so it can be used for gp and xul
[11:49] <gnomefreak> nspr is the same no changes?
[11:50] <Ubulette> i'm on it. i'll do the same as for nss + fix the missing pkgconfig file(s)
[11:54] <gnomefreak> k
[11:55] <Ubulette> https://code.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/nspr/nspr.ubuntu.tag20070713 is the branch
[11:55] <Ubulette> now i need to fix the stuff
[12:00] <Ubulette> gasp, it's another of those make install bug
[12:00] <gnomefreak> Ubulette: im using the cvs tarballs?
[12:00] <Ubulette> yes, it's in fact a tag
[12:00] <Ubulette> take the one matching changelog
[12:00] <gnomefreak> nss you have alpha and cvs tarballs
[12:00] <Ubulette> yes
[12:01] <gnomefreak> alpha it is than
[12:01] <Ubulette> the tag is NSPR_HEAD_20070713
[12:01] <gnomefreak> nspr.ubuntu.tag20070713
[12:02] <gnomefreak> is the nspr i see
[12:02] <Ubulette> yep
[12:02] <Ubulette> tag for nss was NSS_3_12_ALPHA1B
[12:02] <Ubulette> both are frozen as far as sources are concerned
[12:04] <Ubulette> that why i now keep the name .trunk for real HEAD, not those frozen beasts
[12:12] <gnomefreak> Ubulette: you didnt change anything on nspr?
[12:12] <gnomefreak> or atleast didnt push changelog
[12:14] <gnomefreak> http://pastebin.mozilla.org/189139 Ubulette 1st one was yesterday when i pushed to PPA (before my changes) 2nd one is the latest changelog in bzr nspr
[12:15] <Ubulette> ?
[12:16] <Ubulette> i said it's the same and still needs a fix that i'm working on right now
[12:16] <gnomefreak> ah ok
[12:16] <gnomefreak> nss is safe?
[12:17] <gnomefreak> ok nss and trunk are building for PPA
[12:19] <Ubulette> :)
[12:22] <gnomefreak> ok im out for a while
[12:28] <Ubulette> nspr done
[12:28] <Ubulette> pushed
[12:30] <gnomefreak> uploading nss and -trunk ill worry about nspr when i get home
[12:34] <Ubulette> oh, you're not at home
[12:48] <Ubulette> ok, i've pushed my xulrunner-1.9 branch to mt
[12:59] <Ubulette> asac, could you please have a look when you have time
[01:00] <Ubulette> asac, i'm just concerned by /usr/bin/xulrunner, which shouls probably be a diversion from /usr/bin/xulrunner-1.9
[01:00] <Ubulette> should