=== doko_ [n=doko@dslb-088-073-112-156.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === zul_ [n=chuck@mail.edgewater.ca] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === zul [n=chuck@ubuntu/member/zul] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === jml_ [n=jml@ppp108-61.static.internode.on.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === Lure [n=lure@ubuntu/member/lure] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === n2diy [n=darryl@wlk-barre-208-103-148-41.dynamic-dialup.coretel.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === bullgard4 [n=detlef@p54BF2F51.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === tehk [n=tehk@c-69-249-157-157.hsd1.nj.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === ion [n=ion@70-58-119-250.phnx.qwest.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [05:39] rtg: ipw3945 is failing in the same way that it used to in feisty before the softmac fix went in. Has that been reapplied? [05:39] mjg59: dunno. I have not looked in awhile. [05:39] rtg: iwevent never shows it sending an associated event [05:40] mjg59: I'll look in the morning. [05:40] rtg: THanks [05:41] The symptom [05:41] 's pretty obvious - nm just never realises that the network has associated, and iwevent shows no event that would tell it so [05:42] Whereas on iwl4965, I get "New Access Point/Cell address" when it's associated [05:43] mjg59: That sounds roughly the same. I remember there was a workaround where you could click on the wireless net in the NetWork manager drop down list and get it to connect sometimes. === ion [n=ion@70-58-119-250.phnx.qwest.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === tehk [n=tehk@c-69-249-157-157.hsd1.nj.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === n2diy [n=darryl@wlk-barre-208-103-148-41.dynamic-dialup.coretel.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === Lure [n=lure@ubuntu/member/lure] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === jml [n=jml@ppp108-61.static.internode.on.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === zul [n=chuck@ubuntu/member/zul] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === zul_ [n=chuck@mail.edgewater.ca] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === doko_ [n=doko@dslb-088-073-112-156.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === JanC [n=janc@lugwv/member/JanC] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === allee [n=ach@allee.mpe.mpg.de] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === kraut [i=kraut@blackhole.packetloss.biz] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === cobman [n=justinas@212.47.107.8] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === BenC [n=bcollins@debian/developer/bcollins] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === rikai [n=rikai@unaffiliated/rikai] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === IntuitiveNipple [n=TJ@alexandros.tjworld.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === macd [n=d@cl-151.ewr-01.us.sixxs.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === joris [i=joris@082-146-097-071.dyn.adsl.xs4all.be] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === lifeless [n=robertc@ppp245-86.static.internode.on.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === TheMuso [n=luke@ubuntu/member/themuso] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === sparrw [n=kvirc@71.16.203.242] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === n0u [i=Chaton@unaffiliated/nou] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === \sh_away [n=nnsherma@server3.servereyes.de] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === maks_ [n=max@baikonur.stro.at] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === lamont [n=lamont@mix.mmjgroup.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === calc [n=ccheney@conr-adsl-209-169-124-200.consolidated.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === soren [n=sh@ubuntu/member/shawarma] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === maswan [i=maswan@kennedy.acc.umu.se] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === fs [i=fs@213.178.77.100] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === stgraber [n=stgraber@ubuntu/member/stgraber] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === Riddell [i=jr@kde/jriddell] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === smurf [n=smurf@debian/developer/smurf] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === Traxer [i=traxer@shell6.powershells.de] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === infinity [n=adconrad@cerberus.0c3.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === sevrin [n=sevrin@ns1.clipsalportal.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === Nafallo [n=nafallo@ubuntu/member/nafallo] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === thom [n=thom@amnesiac.heapspace.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === sparr [n=sparr@pdpc/supporter/active/sparr] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === rtg [n=rtg@rtg.theglobal.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === elmo [n=james@83-216-156-21.jamest747.adsl.metronet.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === tepsipakki [n=tjaalton@replicant.hut.fi] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === AndyP [n=andyp@ubuntu/member/welshbyte] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === RemoteViewer [n=555@stan.physik.fu-berlin.de] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === OldKid [n=oldi@fresno121.webperoni.de] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === arno-t [n=arno-t@213.80-202-157.nextgentel.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === bullgard4 [n=detlef@p54BF08B1.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === fabbione [n=fabbione@217.207.76.231] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [08:35] hi all. I followed KernelCustomBuild on the ubuntu wiki, but when I try with the flavours=686 passed to debian/rules, I get Error1 file not found? Should I use 386 instead? === h3b [n=scholtys@pD9EC0FDB.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === ICU [n=me@sechzig.dd.ewetel.de] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === Lure [n=lure@external-1.hermes.si] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === JanC [n=janc@lugwv/member/JanC] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [10:02] moin === fabbione [i=fabbione@nat/canonical/x-3bc4cad6e0578031] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === Lure [n=lure@external-1.hermes.si] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === Keybuk [n=scott@quest.netsplit.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === abogani [n=alessio@adsl203-157-083.mclink.it] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === IanC26 [n=IanC26@2002:908b:a5f7:4:216:6fff:fe39:ff6e] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === m0rg0th [n=m0rg0th@220.225.228.97] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === infinity1 [n=adconrad@cerberus.0c3.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === cobman [n=justinas@194.176.50.51] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === infinity3 [n=adconrad@cerberus.0c3.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === tseliot [n=tseliot@host46-199-dynamic.2-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === tseliot [n=tseliot@host46-199-dynamic.2-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it] has left #ubuntu-kernel [] === zul__ [n=chuck@CPE0006258ec6c1-CM000a73655d0e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === dorileo [n=dorileo@201.40.162.47] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === arno-t_ [n=arno-t@213.80-202-157.nextgentel.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === ivoks [n=ivoks@ubuntu/member/ivoks] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === EtienneG [n=etienne@ubuntu/member/EtienneG] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [03:27] mjg59: Gutsy a10df6bc15d12d3efeef35008337f6df7978273c is the Feisty version of the softmac patch. [03:31] rtg: Hm. Interesting. [03:31] Something seems to have caused it to stop working [03:32] mjg59: I had some problems with i3945 RF kill switch, but other then that it seemed to work OK. [03:32] Though I have not used it lately. === tuxmaniac [n=aanjhan@unaffiliated/tuxmaniac] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === mdomsch [n=Matt_Dom@cpe-70-124-62-55.austin.res.rr.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === mkrufky [n=mk@unaffiliated/mkrufky] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === johanbr [n=j@JBrannlund.MathStat.Dal.Ca] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === pkl_ [n=phillip@unaffiliated/pkl/x-764568] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [05:01] I just pushed gutsy merged w/2.6.22.6 [05:03] rtg, pkl_, kylem: Going through these bugs right now: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.22/+bugs?field.searchtext=&orderby=-importance&field.status%3Alist=New&field.status%3Alist=Incomplete&field.status%3Alist=Confirmed&field.status%3Alist=Triaged&field.status%3Alist=In+Progress&field.status%3Alist=Fix+Committed&assignee_option=any&field.assignee=&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_contact=&field.bug_commenter=&field. [05:03] subscriber=&field.status_upstream-empty-marker=1&field.omit_dupes.used=&field.omit_dupes=on&field.has_patch.used=&field.has_patch=on&field.tag=&field.has_cve.used=&search=Search [05:03] those are ones with patches [05:03] I hate lp URLs [05:06] BenC: the xen patch in that list can be disregarded [05:07] The libata acpi code is still sitting on kernel-team [05:09] mjg59: yeah, kernel-team list is going to be gone through too [05:09] Ok, cool [05:11] the -stable kernel is taking a bit longer than usual for their next release, it seems..... there is a horrible regression fix (broken HD5000 atsc tuning) that will most likely be in 2.6.22.7 , if i sent it to kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com , would you guys merge it into gutsy? [05:13] mkrufky: since we likely wont merge past .6, then yes [05:13] ok, i will sent it now, then [05:13] thanks [05:17] Anyone looked at bug #116326? [05:17] rtg: ^^ ? [05:18] BenC: its the the oled one? [05:18] frankly i've not had time to look at any bugs unless i've been specifically asked to. [05:18] BenC: Just a bit ago, but I'm not convinced there is a patch yet. [05:18] rtg: neither am I [05:19] snd-hda-intel is becoming our ata_piix of past releases [05:19] too many new codecs coming out [05:20] They are all wired differently, each with their own quirk. [05:20] i've an x61s that doesn't have sound with latest -rc4 [05:20] you are in a maze of twisty codecs, all alike. [05:20] the walls are closing in. === BenC hits the power button [05:21] safe at last! [05:24] something is wrong w/ my thunderbird configurationhere @ the office --- I couldn't sent patches inline without whitespace-mangling... so, i just fwd'd them from my outbox .... two patches sent. the b2c2-flexcop patch is absolutely crucial, although the ivtv patch should really be applied as well [05:25] luckily, no users noticed these problems yet, as i dont see any bugs in launchpad against 2.6.22 about these.... so, hopefully those will be applied before anybody notices ;-) [05:26] I'm merging #119457 [05:27] kylem: you want to check the kernel-team list for patches to merge, specifically mjg59's libata-acpi one? [05:27] zul: How is rhinefnet different then drivers/net/via-rhine.c ? [05:27] ack it to the list so it's easy to see what we've pulled in === amitk__ [n=amit@a91-154-119-106.elisa-laajakaista.fi] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [05:28] yeah. [05:29] thanks [05:30] BenC: I think you have hardware for bug #119457 [05:30] yeah, I'll be testing it [05:30] Where is ubuntoid? [05:32] rtg: er its not reject it please [05:32] zul: np [05:33] heh at least i got practice with it [05:37] zul: It looks like both versions support the same set of PCI IDs. [05:38] rtg: yeah i had a look thats why i said reject it [05:39] zul: Do you have any issues with the changes to the build system that I cc'ed you on? [05:39] zul: I was just making sure we didn't overlook something. [05:39] amitk__: when did you send the email [05:39] re bug #67175, any reason why the Gutsy kernel isn't built with NFS v3 ACL support? [05:39] tue/wed [05:39] zul: tue/wed [05:40] rtg: when are you uploading? [05:40] wow. [05:40] Oh no! kylem is so good at it that I let him :) [05:41] this via rhine driver is fucked crack addled. [05:41] kylem: the one from VIA, or the one in the kernel ? [05:41] +struct pci_device_id { [05:41] + unsigned int vendor, device; [05:41] + unsigned int subvendor, subdevice; [05:41] + unsigned int class, classmask; [05:41] + unsigned long driver_data; [05:41] +}; [05:41] it has compatibility code all the way back to 2.2.0 [05:41] amitk__: no complaints from me [05:41] kylem: I agree its pretty ugly. [05:44] +#define pci_dma_sync_single(dev,dma_handle,size,direction) do{} while(0) [05:44] heh. [05:44] wow. === tehk [n=tehk@c-69-249-157-157.hsd1.nj.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [05:45] kylem: how much time do I have before a upload? [05:45] amitk__, monday? i dunno, whenever ben tells me to do ti. [05:46] pkl_: last I recall NFSv3 acls were marked as experimental, which is why it wasn't enabled [05:46] kylem: great... [05:46] BenC? [05:47] kylem: Monday sounds good [05:47] ok. [05:47] hmm, that will be interesting. [05:47] BenC: it is no longer marked as expermental (in the Gutsy kernel). So, this can probably now be enabled. [05:48] upload at 5pm, get on plane at 6:30pm, be in london for 7am BST and fix any fallout. haha. [05:49] pkl_: good, people have been wanting that for awhile [05:50] kylem: I was thinking earlier Monday :) === ivoks [n=ivoks@3-219.dsl.iskon.hr] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [06:03] rtg: you've reviewed the patch in bug #126849 already, right (ATA dev detection)? === tiziano [n=tiziano@host55-123-static.125-81-b.business.telecomitalia.it] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [06:04] BenC: Note the last comment in the LP report. It is not upstream, and its had plenty of time if it was going to be accepted. [06:05] rtg: have you checked libata-dev git? [06:05] good evening, is there a way to reconfigure the ubuntu kernel and still have restricted drivers support? [06:05] the usually show up there first [06:05] BenC: no, only linux-2.6 and s.6.22.y [06:05] tiziano: depends on what you mean by reconfigure [06:06] rtg: gitweb should work on git.kernel.org for that tree, if you want to check [06:06] mkae menuconfig ; make ; make modules install ; etc [06:06] tiziano: then no [06:07] how am i supposed to reconfigure the kernel, i need something modified to boot my thurion laptop boot without noapic option... [06:07] currently it only boots with noapic [06:07] i managed to get a bootable kernel with gentoo [06:08] tiziano: best bet is to file a bug, and tell us what patch you need to make things work so we can get our kernel booting on your system [06:08] otherwise you are on your own [06:14] hi all. I ran "AUTOBUILD=1 NOEXTRAS=1 fakeroot debian/rules binary-debs flavours=386" as suggested on the wiki and after a few hours ended up with no errors. But also with no .deb files? Do I have to copy down bzImage and system map etc manually? [06:15] arno-t_: debian/build/*.deb [06:15] that's where you'll find things [06:15] and I believe the wiki mentions that === tuxmaniac [n=aanjhan@unaffiliated/tuxmaniac] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [06:15] Thanks a lot. The wiki says "The debs are placed in your kernel directory's parent directory." [06:16] to me that would be the parent of from where i run the script... [06:18] fact is this bug is ages old [06:18] kernel hang at boot, it only boots with 1000mhz /low latency [06:18] infact low latency image does boot [06:18] afk 5 minutes [06:22] arno-t_: Its different for Gutsy then it is for Feisty. Gutsy creates debs in the parent, Feisty in debian/build [06:32] re [06:32] thank BenC [06:33] my laptop only boot with the low latency kernel, otherwise it needs noapic, should i file a bug? [06:33] tiziano: still the case for gutsy? [06:33] feisty [06:33] tiziano: try gutsy...we aren't going to work on a fix for feisty [06:33] afaik low latency is not auto updated, you need to search for it [06:34] no idea what you mean by that [06:34] we don't have lowlatency in gutsy [06:36] i mean a user that want to install ubuntu from the cd needs noapic to boot, than he needs to know that there's a kernel build named low-latency. low-latency is not listed in the auto-update [06:37] at any rate I had the fortune to find it, just wondering why low-latency it's not showed in the auto update [06:37] that notify are thing that let you update and reboot... [06:38] are=area [06:41] BenC: the libata patches proposed by Edward Amsden are not in libata-dev. [06:42] hi, where is the official gutsy home page? [06:45] kylem: please merge https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.22/+bug/136426 [06:50] kylem: I'll get #136426. I've been wanting it for awhile. [06:50] wanting it why? [06:50] rtg: thx :) [06:50] you know about $CONCURRENCY_LEVEL, don't you? [06:50] kylem: for muli-arch parallel buildusing 'debuild -b' [06:51] Maybe multi-arch is the wrong term, but you know what I mean. [06:51] kylem: $CONCURRENCY_LEVEL doesn't work with debuild does it? It does not appear that it does. [06:52] export CONCURRENCY_LEVEL=4 [06:52] why wouldn't 'CONCURRENCY_LEVEL=4 debuild -b' work? [06:52] kylem: nobody else but you knows about it, DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS is more known, and it can be supported by buildds [06:53] yeah, sorry, i guess i'm the only person who looks in the rules files of the packages i build... [06:53] yeah, thats the problem, gcc had its own grown way as well [06:54] that was sarcasm. [06:54] buildds already appear to build in parallel... [06:55] doko, is this a new standard or something? Debian uses CONCURRENCY_LEVEL as well, which is why i'm pushing back... [06:56] right, see bug 136420 === macd [n=d@cl-151.ewr-01.us.sixxs.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [06:57] its proposed policy and followed by several packages [06:57] fine. [06:59] doko: It appears to be working for me. [06:59] surprise ;-P [06:59] I suppose since you wrote it, it'll have to work :) [07:01] well, this time I did even test it =) [07:02] rtg: CONCURRENCY_LEVEL is what kernel-package uses [07:02] s/rtg/everyone/ [07:03] BenC: And that is what I normally use when building for a single arch. [07:04] I didn't remove the use of CONCURRENCY_LEVEL, just added the proposed one [07:04] ok [07:04] if it's proposed policy, then it makes sense to support it [07:13] rtg: thanks for commit :-) [07:14] btw https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/74362 is caused by firmware being loaded before the first ifup [07:14] mkrufky: np [07:15] oh, you git-cherry-picked them... my s-o-b is missing from the ivtv fix ... oh well [07:16] anyway thats not important -- thanks [07:18] and for 74362 its still in gutsy by the look of it [07:19] mkrufky: I didn't think to look for your s-o-b, I just plucked 'em from Linus' tree. They applied clean. Please test at your earliest opportunity. [07:20] rtg: the missing s-o-b is the only difference ... the changesets are exactly what was in linus' tree [07:20] i cherry-picked them myself, and just fwd'd the patches [07:20] i can send you pull requests from my tree on kernel.org in the future, if thats what u prefer [07:21] mkrufky: That would be fine. Its a much easier way to preserve the provenance of a patch. [07:21] rtg: ok, cool... will do for next time [07:27] rtg, to avoid having to repull, want to just pull the mjg59 patch i acked, and i'll blat it from my tree and pull yours? it looks like it will commit on top fine. [07:34] kylem: While you are in London you should watch over mjg59's shoulder until he creates his git repo on kernel.ubuntu.com. [07:34] kylem: I'll git the 'Re-add _GTM and _STM support' and push it up in a few minutes. === dorileo [n=dorileo@201.40.162.47] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === _dorileo_ [n=dorileo@201.40.162.47] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [07:54] kylem: pushed === amitk [n=amit@a91-154-119-106.elisa-laajakaista.fi] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === bullgard4 [n=detlef@p54BF1CED.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === pkl_ [n=phillip@unaffiliated/pkl/x-764568] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [08:30] thanks === pkl_ [n=phillip@unaffiliated/pkl/x-764568] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === clever_ [n=clever@fctnnbsc16w-156034219024.nb.aliant.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === bullgard4 [n=detlef@p54BF1CED.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === cobman [n=justinas@194.176.50.25] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === rikai [n=rikai@unaffiliated/rikai] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === Kousotu [i=Invincib@adsl-68-79-9-194.dsl.emhril.ameritech.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [10:25] anyone know if/when Atheros WiFi card AG5007EG wil be supported, or have some kind of connection options in Ubuntu? [10:28] Kousotu: as soon as upstream supports it in a stable release [10:28] damn... [10:29] my zd1211rw is hving isues now.. and my atheros is th only other wifi card I have [10:32] kylem: I just pushed newrelease for gutsy tree with ABIs from 10.30 [10:33] ok thanks. [10:34] lpia included [10:34] BenC: What does Ubuntu use for Ethernet, a gneteral "cover-all" driver? [10:35] general* [10:35] uh, no, there's separate ethernet drivers for each chipset [10:36] tht's interstesing... [10:36] you guys do all the main coding stuff? [10:37] Heh, no, we use a linux kernel...it's all done upstream by kernel developers === Kousotu scratches his head === allee [n=ach@dialin-145-254-253-230.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [10:38] I mean asfar as updates and such === Kousotu points out that he has a LOUSY keyboard [10:39] well we do a lot of work putting everything together, patches, fixed bugs, and deciding which drivers to enable, and other drivers from third parties to include [10:40] I see... [10:41] this my be a bug, I don't know. but wth absolutly ever Guty release I've used my sound works untill I update [10:41] my sound card is not very old, but that just irks me.. [10:41] I'm not sure what you mean [10:41] how does your sound work until you update...do you get it working again? [10:41] I'll explai [10:42] explain* [10:43] my sound on install, Tribe 3, 4 and 5; worked flawlessly, butin every case I installed the updates.and after installing the updates it worked ok, untill I rebooted then it stopped working [10:43] and it's happened on al3 tribes I've used [10:43] all* [10:44] that's likely fixed now [10:44] I doubt it, honestly [10:45] and on top of it all, my wifi is actingup, only on linux.. [10:46] lemme reboot, and I'll be back. I' on windows at the moment [10:48] kylem: I've got amd64 and i386 builds going...I'll do lrm/lum with them and try them out [10:48] hopefully no ABI bump, but we still have updates in lum to upload anyway === cobman [n=justinas@194.176.50.25] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [10:53] ok, brb [10:53] I had to take the dongle apart lol [10:56] BenC, i'm pretty sure there will be, if not, the apparmor stuff will do it. === kousotu [n=kousotu@adsl-68-79-9-194.dsl.emhril.ameritech.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [11:20] BenC: no luck on sound, and my wifi looks to be shot too now [11:20] ay known way to repair a module? [11:24] any* [11:24] kylem: looks like USB core changes caused an ABI bump already [11:25] goodnight, folks [11:25] nite === mkrufky [n=mk@unaffiliated/mkrufky] has left #ubuntu-kernel [] [11:26] BenC: So, I've /finally/ got a working memory stick driver [11:27] conrats mjg59, I can't even find on eofr windows [11:27] lol [11:27] kylem: abi bump pushed [11:27] mjg59: it doesn't require a crap load of changes to core mmc does it? [11:27] BenC: None [11:27] Other than disabling CONFIG_TIFM [11:27] excellent, then you rock :) [11:28] BenC: and ideas for my issues? [11:28] kousotu: run an update to latest linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.22-10-generic and reboot [11:29] linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.22-10-generic set to manual installed. [11:29] 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. [11:29] kousotu@kousotu-laptop:~$ [11:29] kousotu: did you run apt-get update first? [11:31] Failed to fetch http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu/dists/gutsy/commercial/binary-i386/Packages.gz 404 Not Found [11:31] Failed to fetch http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu/dists/gutsy/commercial/source/Sources.gz 404 Not Found [11:31] Reading package lists... Done [11:31] E: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead. [11:31] sorry, that was a bbit big for pasting in chan [11:32] I've no idea what the commercial repo is, that's a problem for some other channel to help you with [11:32] linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.22-10-generic is already the newest version. [11:32] 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 8 not upgraded. [11:32] well, I simply reported errors [11:33] never had issues, even when it fails there [11:34] were updates, literally, just released? [11:35] within the past few days [11:35] what sound chip do you have? [11:35] I installed all of them, then I just got an update msg [11:35] realtek (sec) [11:36] Realtek ALC883 [11:38] rtg: thanks [11:38] kousotu: http://people.ubuntu.com/~bcollins/linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.22-10-generic_2.6.22-10.25_i386.deb [11:38] kousotu: install that and reboot, then let me know [11:39] that goodness for debs [11:39] lol [11:41] Of course, I try it again and it starts behaving badly [11:41] SIgh [11:41] how do I know when it installed? [11:41] I have a feeling the debug spew might have been slowing it down enough to work properly [11:44] BenC: it says [11:44] "Installing package file..." [11:44] (the enter was on accident) [11:46] how long does it usually take? [11:55] BenC: it's not doing anything [11:57] kousotu: it will finish, just wait [11:58] how long does it usually take to finish? [11:58] depends on how fast your machine is [11:58] 1.86 ghz [11:58] sry, I don't have a time estimate based on clock speed [11:59] just wait, it will finish [11:59] which runs circles around my old 2.2 [11:59] rough Idea? my mom's getting annoyed [12:00] Ha. Yeah, a udelay at the same point as one of the debug statements fixes it [12:06] how did we get a new driver in linux-source? [12:06] nm, makefile fix [12:06] lol [12:06] kousotu: IIRC gdebi keeps showing that message, but when installation is ready there should be another one saying so ;) === TIZIANO [n=TIZIANO@213-140-19-112.fastres.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [12:07] yay... it's taking this long just to prepair? [12:09] sudo dpkg -i *.deb [12:12] ty, much faster [12:12] it did just this: [12:12] Unpacking replacement linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.22-10-generic ... [12:12] Setting up linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.22-10-generic (2.6.22-10.25) ... [12:12] update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.22-10-generic [12:13] Unpacking replacement linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.22-10-generic ... [12:13] Setting up linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.22-10-generic (2.6.22-10.25) ... [12:13] update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.22-10-generic [12:13] oops... [12:13] didn't mean to hit that twice [12:14] you don't need to tell me what it did [12:14] just do it, and reboot [12:14] k [12:14] I didn't know what that did [12:15] it installs the package [12:15] once it's done, reboot and see if that fixes sound for you [12:15] k [12:15] brb === kousotu [n=kousotu@adsl-68-79-9-194.dsl.emhril.ameritech.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [12:19] BenC: did nothing [12:19] sound still doesn't work [12:19] oh, and synaptic popped up a kernal update [12:19] kernel* [12:19] which seems to lead to the the same version [12:21] Woohoo === mjg59 inserts a memory stick and marvels as it automounts [12:21] Only three layers of code needed to achieve that [12:22] kousotu: ignore that update === kousotu beats up mjg59 and stels the stick [12:22] BenC: k, but sound still doesn't work [12:22] kousotu: do these commands for me and show the output [12:22] k [12:22] kousotu: ls -l /proc/asound/ [12:22] You want a 128MB memory stick duo? You're pretty much welcome to it [12:23] pro duo? [12:23] BenC: root needed? [12:23] kousotu: I'll add sudo where needed, so no [12:23] total 0 [12:23] dr-xr-xr-x 7 root root 0 2007-08-31 17:23 card0 [12:24] -r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 2007-08-31 17:23 cards [12:24] -r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 2007-08-31 17:23 devices [12:24] lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 5 2007-08-31 17:23 Intel -> card0 [12:24] -r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 2007-08-31 17:23 modules [12:24] dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0 2007-08-31 17:23 oss [12:24] -r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 2007-08-31 17:23 pcm [12:24] dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0 2007-08-31 17:23 seq [12:24] -r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 2007-08-31 17:23 timers [12:24] -r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 2007-08-31 17:23 version [12:24] ok, I usually sudo -i to get into root when running commands, so I thought I'd ask [12:24] asoundconf set-default-card card0 [12:24] still no sudo needed [12:24] do not run as sudo in fact, this will break things [12:25] ok, well, that gave no output [12:25] not supposed to [12:25] k [12:25] log out and back in [12:25] just reporting lol [12:25] restart X? [12:25] logging out will restart X [12:25] yea, but I could keyboard it just as fast === BenC *sigh* === kousotu [n=kousotu@adsl-68-79-9-194.dsl.emhril.ameritech.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [12:27] stil no sound [12:27] kousotu: ctrl+alt+backspace doesn't guarantee to kill off things like esd and such, which may need to be for this to work [12:28] ah... [12:28] ok, I'll try again [12:28] kousotu: restart again, and if sound isn't working, file a bug report === kousotu [n=kousotu@adsl-68-79-9-194.dsl.emhril.ameritech.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [12:29] same effect, nothing [12:30] so I should report a bug? [12:31] yeah [12:31] ok, I'll do that first thing when I return home, cause I gotta head out for a bit [12:32] this same issue has been in the last 3 gutsy releases [12:32] well, what sbout the newest kernel? might that fix it? [12:36] nope [12:36] I'm really not believing it is a kernel problem [12:36] was worth asking [12:36] lol [12:36] if you installed tribe-5 and it worked, you have the latest kernel [12:37] right, but mine shows as *.25 [12:37] Latest kernel upload: 2.6.22-10.26 [12:37] Ok, we can go over it in the bug report [12:37] start of my 3-day weekend now [12:38] and how do I report it? [12:39] er.. [12:39] hold that thought, I will be back in about 20-30 mins === VWJ1bnR1 [n=hewij@c-71-236-227-217.hsd1.or.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [12:42] When I get a kernel package as described on http://www.howtoforge.com/kernel_compilation_ubuntu, does it matter what package I choose?