[12:38] <ubotu> New bug: #134431 in xserver-xorg-driver-nv (main) "LiveCD initial GUI broken" [Medium,Triaged]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/134431
[05:18] <bryce> I've gone through all of the fedora patches - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Fixes_to_Backport
[05:18] <bryce> I'm running a build of all the patches that applied and configured cleanly
[05:56] <ubotu> New bug: #134271 in compiz (main) "mpeg-1 playback does not work (dup-of: 111257)" [Medium,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/134271
[05:56] <ubotu> New bug: #134272 in totem (main) "theora playback does not work (dup-of: 111257)" [Low,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/134272
[10:40] <tepsipakki> bryce: the fedora mesa-patch supercedes our copy
[10:41] <tepsipakki> keescook: selinux-support is going in xserver 1.5
[10:45] <tepsipakki> http://wiki.x.org/wiki/Releases/7.4
[11:30] <ubotu> New bug: #31009 in xserver-xorg-driver-ati "Targa Traveller 826 - built-in LCD not recognised by x-server (dup-of: 22985)" [Unknown,Fix released]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/31009
[06:45] <ubotu> New bug: #136615 in xserver-xorg-video-intel (main) "X server crashes on suspend to RAM after recent Gutsy update" [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/136615
[07:41] <bryce> tepsipakki: ah, ok.  Looks like it's going to take a bit of massaging to get it in
[07:42] <bryce> tepsipakki: I would appreciate it if you could go through that wiki page and flag patches that you know should or shouldn't be included, and the ones I included but that I wasn't sure about if you have an opinion on them
[09:01] <tepsipakki> bryce: sure
[09:11] <tepsipakki> bryce: btw, did you look at the fedora xserver specfile? The patches are grouped in different categories, and the ones that are redhat-specific should probably be left out
[09:11] <bryce> ah, no I didn't
[09:14] <tepsipakki> xserver-1.3.0-newglx-offscreen-pixmaps.patch is a new version of 120-...
[09:18] <bryce> is that the tfp patch?  it looked rather small to be the tfp stuff, but I didn't see another patch that looked like it.
[09:18] <tepsipakki> also, the patch order can be seen from the specfile
[09:18] <tepsipakki> and changelog :)
[09:18] <bryce> good point
[09:19] <tepsipakki> so, the mesa-patch needs to be applied before exa-update and newglx...patch
[09:19] <bryce> ok
[09:30] <tepsipakki> mesa-patch conflicts with patches 21, 125, 126, 127
[09:30] <tepsipakki> they all can be commented out
[09:30] <bryce> excellent
[09:30] <tepsipakki> 21 only affects arches Ubuntu doesn't support
[09:31] <tepsipakki> and in fact, 125-127 can be dropped since they are ours :)
[09:38] <tepsipakki> hmm, add patch 43 to the list
[09:38] <bryce> 43 as one to drop?
[09:39] <tepsipakki> as one conflictiong
[09:39] <tepsipakki> -o
[09:39] <bryce> ok
[09:40] <tepsipakki> leaving that out the mesa/exa/newglx-patches applied fine
[09:42] <bryce> did you update the ordering as well?
[09:42] <tepsipakki> the mesa-patch removes some files, one of which 43 touched
[09:43] <tepsipakki> I just put those three as 133/134/135 (mesa/exa/newglx)
[09:56] <tepsipakki> I'll continue with the rest tomorrow :)
[10:03] <bryce> awesome.  I'll kick off a build myself with these changes.
[10:04] <bryce> Btw, this morning I also started drafting up a X Quick Check list for our testers:  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Testing/QuickCheck
[10:04] <bryce> next I'm working on one for gamers
[10:36] <bryce> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Testing/GamerTest