[01:20] so you don't see how to fix it properly? [01:21] The only way I can see to fix this properly is to change the test case in xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md/unix/Makefile.in from Linuxppc to Linuxpowerpc [01:21] Thats unlikely to break anything else, but I am still running a grep to see if its anywhere else in the tree. [01:23] Ok, it seems that its only checked for in the above mentioned file. [01:24] So it can build ppc xptcall code. [01:24] for linux [01:26] Either that, or e use CPU_ARCH instead of OS_ARCH in the check. [01:27] sorry, CPU_ARCH instead of OS_TEST [01:37] asac, lol [01:37] dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/xulrunner_1.8.1.4-2ubuntu3_i386.deb (--unpack): [01:37] trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/xulrunner', which is also in package xulrunner-1.9 [01:38] that's not good [01:38] i guess a diversion will do === DarkMageZ [n=richard@ppp121-44-11-183.lns4.syd7.internode.on.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [02:19] Ubulette: assume that its gone [02:19] we don't need a diversion [02:19] later we need an alternative [02:19] if we want two parallel installs [02:20] or drop the unversioned link completely [02:20] TheMuso: how about powerpc64? is it the same? [02:23] asac: Without having a ppc64 box I can't say for sure, but as far as I am aware, all userspace stuff is all powerpc, and the kernel is either powerpc or powerpc64. i.e unlike amd64, userspace for both powerpc and powerpc64 is the same. I am having another look however to be sure. [02:30] TheMuso: have you looked in nsprpub and security ... they have their own build system and probably match for arch as well [02:31] I'll take a look. [02:52] asac: Except for kernel and glibc packages, everything else is standard powerpc, including compilers, so if firefox is built on a ppc64 ubuntu, it sould still see the powerpc-linux-gnu build. uname -m on a ppc64 box would in fact give ppc64 as the result, so the change that was made is correct. [02:53] As for nsprpub, it uses a similar check in configure.in for OS_TEST that was used before the toplevel configure.in was changed to use cpu_target. i.e nsprpub uses uname -m. [02:55] asac: whats wrong with iceape? === gnomefreak is heading to hospital tomorrow and i will have only laptop so i wont beable to do much with building as its slow (low mem low ram) [03:02] well i guess ill check with you tomorrow === Jazzva [n=sasa@cable-89-216-130-161.dynamic.sbb.co.yu] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [03:35] asac, I suppose you're not online? [03:37] Anyone up who could help me a bit with layouts in XUL? [03:43] Hmm... nevermind, it works now. asac, there'll be a new upload to my ubufox branch which will fix the icon alignment. === jbs [n=Bernardo@89.181.191.46] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === kompozer [n=kaze@AGrenoble-152-1-79-114.w86-193.abo.wanadoo.fr] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [10:06] gnomefreak: wrong? i think i just didn't come to sponsoring it [10:06] gnomefreak: i will look now [10:09] gnomefreak: the configure checkin doesn't update configure properly [10:10] most likely because you didn't add the 20_force... to 00list before you ran autoconf2.13 [10:10] cwong1: i uploaded a fixed midbrowser [10:10] cwong1: it was a packaging bug after all === AlexLatchford_ [n=alex@82-44-193-109.cable.ubr07.haye.blueyonder.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [11:43] asac: what do you mean. it was added to 00list long before i did autoconf. the only thing that didnt change is the changelog [11:44] no you didn't [11:44] i fixed it now [11:44] will upload to mozillateam [11:45] you can look at bzr log to see that you didn't add to 00list before updating 00configure [11:45] 99 [11:45] i had to since dpatch added it to 00list [11:45] gnomefreak: well look at bzr ... and look at the diff of your 99_configure ... you will see that the VISIBILITY changes you patch against configure.in are not in there [11:46] so as long as dpatch did what it was supposed to do it was added first [11:46] and i uncommitted ... committed first 00list then ran dpatch-edit-patch 99_configure; autoconf2.13; exit 0 [11:46] and all was fine [11:46] committed 99_configure ... changelog [11:46] done [11:46] gnomefreak: you have to verify everything manually [11:47] gnomefreak: don't just hope that dpatch did something ... verify that it did [11:47] :) [11:47] i cant get a diff :( [11:47] that will safe you from lots of nasty bugs ;) [11:47] bzr diff gives me nothing [11:47] you will figure out ... you have to diff revisions [11:51] bzr: ERROR: Path(s) are not versioned: 89 [11:51] i continue to get that no matter what revisions i use [11:56] the problem i am missing is that 20_force was in 00list i edited it (it stayed in 00list) than i ran autoconf2.13 so it had to be there before, remember you asked me before i started it was there before i removed the garbage from it [11:57] cant go by bzr revisions as they had deverged so when i merged they ended up in that order [12:06] reallly ... it just worked here ... so you must have done something wrong. [12:07] it looked fine here. but anyway how is n-m on detected networks? === gnomefreak hopes to have a connection in hospital and i couldnt get one in PA but i could have been doing it wrong [12:09] like can i go in and choose a network to use that it detected or is there more to it [12:11] once you push iceape to MT ill pull from it and go from there (not really too concered with it atm) [12:12] gnomefreak: what chipset? [12:12] its a dlink card not sure of chipset [12:13] im gonna have to pull it out and find out huh? [12:13] ok ... you can see in syslog when you plug in card i guess [12:14] give me a few im gonna take some more pills and set it up === gnomefre1k [n=gnomefre@adsl-221-44-139.rmo.bellsouth.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [12:51] asac: does this help? 06:00.0 Ethernet controller: Atheros Communications, Inc. AR5212 802.11abg NIC (rev 01) [12:51] i looked in syslog but didnt see anything helpful [12:52] yes [12:52] is it broken? [12:52] im on it so it cant be oo broken [12:52] gnomefre1k: search for interface_add in syslog ... tell me what that line looks like please [12:52] the t button is broken [12:52] do you use wpa? === embeemb [n=embee@212.12.250.26] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [12:54] i dont think so [12:54] please search for what i asked above [12:55] hey, i [12:55] i'm not sure if i'm at the right place or not, but i need help with xulrunner [12:55] which xulrunner? [12:55] the one packaged in ubuntu? [12:56] i got it from the mozilla webbie [12:56] then we are not the right channel ;) [12:56] oh :$ any idea where else should I look [12:56] #xulrunner irc.mozilla.org (if that channel exists) [12:56] cool ! thanks a mill ! [12:57] asac: cat syslog | grep interface_add brings up nothing [12:58] case-insensitive [12:58] its INTERFACE_ADD [12:58] lunch now [12:59] thas odd [01:00] bbl [01:01] have fun ill keep looking === DarkMageZ [n=richard@ppp121-44-11-183.lns4.syd7.internode.on.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === Paddy_EIRE [n=patrick@78.144.25.19] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === shirish [n=shirish@59.95.7.178] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [05:02] asac: Ubulette: anybody up? [05:03] tonyyarusso: whenever you are up, https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Kompozer , afaik Kompozer isn't in the repositories yet. I did updates just now & still its not up. If its going to be lemme know, cheers [05:10] shirish: i am [05:12] asac: I know its lame but any idea about the roadmap of gnash? I went through the mailing list of gnash today but couldn't find any sort of roadmap of it :( [05:12] asac: also, are you building the final 0.8.1 to push for inclusion in gutsy or no? [05:16] asac: also do you read otte's blog http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/ , I find it highly interesting :) === asac [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [05:26] shirish: It's sitting in the NEW queue for processing, so yes, technically it's not in yet, but should be "any time now" (figured that would be close enough - didn't expect many people to actually read that yet) [05:26] tonyyarusso: ok cool , thanx for the quick reply, I am subscribed to it :) [05:27] :) [05:34] I'm sure guys have read this one, its an old blog post http://blogs.zdnet.com/Stewart/index.php?p=177 but equally interesting === shirish [n=shirish@59.95.7.178] has left #ubuntu-mozillateam [] === am2g5_1 [n=armin@dslb-084-058-082-251.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === Paddy_EIRE [n=patrick@78.144.25.19] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === Ubulette_ [n=Ubulette@APuteaux-153-1-62-108.w82-124.abo.wanadoo.fr] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === tonyy [n=tonyyaru@ubuntu/member/tonyyarusso] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [11:21] Do we intend to package Songbird when a full release is made? === tonyy is just trying it out for the first time - kinda nifty [11:22] (I needed a free media player for Windows, so it was either this or VLC) === nich2chien_ [n=all@ARennes-256-1-68-56.w90-32.abo.wanadoo.fr] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [11:56] hi === jbs_ [n=Bernardo@89.181.121.164] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === hjmf [n=hjmf@7.Red-83-44-173.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === nich2chien_ [n=all@ARennes-256-1-68-56.w90-32.abo.wanadoo.fr] has left #ubuntu-mozillateam ["Ex-Chat"] === hjmf [n=hjmf@7.Red-83-44-173.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === hjmf [n=hjmf@7.Red-83-44-173.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === Ubulette_ is now known as Ubulette [12:37] tonyyarusso, i will probably package songbird, but it's not straight forward. upstream is kinda messy, filled with prebuilt deps and calling files from dep source trees to build core songbird. [12:38] so it needs serious rework of the build system to be acceptable [12:38] as for a media player for windows, i don't see why you ask here...