[03:40] <bhale> jono: that shirt rules
[03:41] <LaserJock> hi bhale
[03:41] <bhale> hi LaserJock
[03:42] <LaserJock> bhale: how goes it?
[03:43] <bhale> is ok, howre you
[03:43] <LaserJock> surviving, sorta ;-)
[03:47] <mjg59> jdstrand: Yeah, might be differently broken
[03:47] <mjg59> Some more work to do on the Lenovo machines
[03:56] <keescook> geser: got it; uploading now.  thanks!
[04:57] <rockets> Is there any chance that a metapackage remover will be added to synaptic?
[04:57] <rockets> e.g. something that actually removes all the packages it installed
[05:00] <LaserJock> rockets: there's really not much of a need anymore
[05:00] <rockets> LaserJock, why do you say that
[05:00] <LaserJock> rockets: packages installed to satisfy a dependency are flagged as auto removable
[05:00] <rockets> LaserJock, that works for metapackages?
[05:00] <LaserJock> for anything
[05:00] <rockets> cool
[05:01] <LaserJock> it's been that way since Feisty
[05:01] <LaserJock> maybe even some in Edgy
[05:01] <rockets> then how about an autoremove in synaptic :-D
[05:01] <LaserJock> it is
[05:01] <LaserJock> there should be an autoremovable section
[05:02] <LaserJock> when you sort by status
[05:03] <rockets> ill try it
[05:03] <rockets> this is in feisty/
[05:03] <rockets> ?
[05:03] <rockets> LaserJock, I dont see it, i only see complete removal, which just does a --purge
[05:04] <Fujitsu> rockets: Click the `Status' button under the section list.
[05:04] <Fujitsu> And find `Installed (auto-removable)'
[05:05] <rockets> ah i see it
[05:05] <rockets> the only thing there is python2.4 though
[05:05] <rockets> why not other metapackages
[05:05] <rockets> like ubuntu-desktop, not that i want to remove that but shouldnt it be there
[05:05] <LaserJock> no
[05:05] <rockets> why?
[05:06] <LaserJock> well, packages that are installed by default don't go in there I don't think
[05:06] <rockets> ok
[05:06] <Fujitsu> Metapackages aren't autoremovable...
[05:06] <rockets> thanks!
[05:06] <LaserJock> because they were there to start with
[05:06] <Fujitsu> Stuff depended on by metapackages is.
[05:06] <LaserJock> right
[05:11] <TheMuso> A common example is old kernels...
[05:11] <TheMuso> that get left behind by linux-image/linux-generic upgrades.
[06:50] <calc> i think lpsolve got demoted back to universe, anyone around that could put it back into main?
[06:50] <calc> i uploaded openoffice.org and its depwait on it now
[09:24] <tepsipakki> I'm going to upload a new xserver-xorg-video-ati package later today
[10:09] <Kopfgeldjaeger> tag
[11:12] <pygi> mjg59, around perhaps?
[11:24] <knight5482> hello plz can someone help me , i would like to know if it possible to update ubuntu 7.04 Standard personal computer (x86 architecture, PentiumTM, CeleronTM, AthlonTM, SempronTM) to 64 bit version  ?
[11:25] <Amaranth> knight5482: this is also not the right channel
[11:25] <Amaranth> knight5482: you want #ubuntu
[11:25] <Amaranth> but i already gave you an answer
[11:34] <pygi> mjg59, unping, got it =)
[02:21] <kagou> hi
[02:22] <kagou> is it still possible to ask for adding a package not present in gutsy (from debian) ?
[02:23] <kagou> i need gtkimageview from http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=gtkimageview&searchon=names&suite=unstable&section=all
[02:26] <kagou> StevenK, ping
[02:28] <StevenK> kagou: Pong
[02:34] <kagou> StevenK, can you rebuilt ufraw package
[02:34] <kagou> StevenK, it's seems that " gimp (<< 2.4)" under source don't allow installation on gutsy
[02:36] <kagou> StevenK, Bug #138404
[02:36] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 138404 in ufraw "ufraw gimp 2.4" [Undecided,Incomplete]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/138404
[05:11] <blablabla> Please help me: http://tinyurl.com/2yu2te
[05:51] <funman> hi
[06:06] <kgoetz> !seen cjwatson
[06:06] <ubotu> Sorry, I don't know anything about seen cjwatson - try searching on http://ubotu.ubuntu-nl.org/factoids.cgi
[06:07] <kgoetz> bloody bot
[06:07] <funman> !seen pyro
[06:07] <ubotu> Sorry, I don't know anything about seen pyro - try searching on http://ubotu.ubuntu-nl.org/factoids.cgi
[06:08] <funman> !seen fboudra
[06:08] <ubotu> Sorry, I don't know anything about seen fboudra - try searching on http://ubotu.ubuntu-nl.org/factoids.cgi
[06:08] <funman> :/
[06:08] <funman> !seen funman
[06:08] <ubotu> Sorry, I don't know anything about seen funman - try searching on http://ubotu.ubuntu-nl.org/factoids.cgi
[06:08] <funman> !seen ubotu
[06:08] <ubotu> Sorry, I don't know anything about seen ubotu - try searching on http://ubotu.ubuntu-nl.org/factoids.cgi
[06:08] <funman> :/
[06:48] <kagou> thank you StevenK for ufraw :)
[07:07] <mdke> I've just upgraded to gutsy and all seems to be ok; except udevd is really hogging my cpu, between 60 and 85%. Is this known already?
[07:10] <ionstorm> wrong channel for this but I know you guys are smart, nobody knows how to fix my issue in any support channel https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/138440
[07:10] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 138440 in linux-source-2.6.20 "P4 Hyperthread enabled wont boot generic Kernel" [Undecided,New] 
[07:11] <mdke> ah, yes, plenty of bugs about it
[07:11] <soren> ionstorm: Everyone (well, almost) is on weekend.
[07:11] <ionstorm> ic
[07:12] <ionstorm> ;] 
[07:12] <ionstorm> so im not allone?
[07:12] <ionstorm> alone* thats good
[07:13] <ionstorm> im wondering if linux-2.6.22 will fix it, going to compile it
[07:13] <mdke> (it was bug 115616, ftr)
[07:13] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 115616 in evms "Device-mapper errors: dm-linear, lookup failed" [High,In progress]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/115616
[07:15] <ionstorm> so my bug is related to device mapper errors?
[07:15] <mdke> ionstorm: no, my question
[07:15] <mdke> ionstorm: I don't know about your issue
[07:15] <ionstorm> ah
[07:16] <calc> ionstorm: someone on the kernel team will probably have to look at your bug to determine what is causing it
[07:16] <ionstorm> cool
[07:16] <ionstorm> thanks calc
[07:18] <calc> ionstorm: how far does it get into the boot process when it hangs?
[07:18] <ionstorm> not far, let me look at the bug log I posted to know exactly
[07:19] <ionstorm> well it gets to enabling processor 1/1 or something like that
[07:19] <ionstorm> i dont have a digital camera to take a pic of it, it happens fast too
[07:19] <ionstorm> loads quick and reboots instantly
[07:20] <ionstorm> I hope those logs are a help in the bug report
[07:21] <calc> asac: cool, saw the report about fixed ipw driver
[07:21] <albert23> ionstorm: you could try and run a live cd with HT enabled, see if that works
[07:21] <ionstorm> i will definately try that
[07:22] <ionstorm> I will post the results on that report
[07:22] <calc> ionstorm: oh ok
[07:22] <ionstorm> right now im compiling another kernel to try
[07:22] <ionstorm> could be just the generic kernel
[07:24] <albert23> ionstorm: one remark: please add log files as attachment in launchpad, instead of pasting the text
[07:24] <ionstorm> albert23, good idea
[07:25] <ionstorm> i will definately do that in the future
[07:46] <pochu> jdong: could you please check a backport failure? It doesn't look like the package's fault: http://sharkattack.media.mit.edu/inventory/view_log/174
[07:49] <pochu> jdong: forget it, it's tracker's fault.
[10:11] <Kopfgeldjaeger> nacht