[12:38] <xhaker> doko, thanks for the help with my questions
[12:38] <xhaker> lpia is building ok :)
[12:38] <doko> \o/
[12:39] <xhaker> those directories bindings for /proc, etc.. where not so easy to understand.. if i was supposed to do it on the  chroot or the main system.. i figured it out.
[12:39] <xhaker> s/where/were
[12:56] <doko> xhaker: it's a wiki, you can edit it ;p
[12:53] <xhaker> Hi all
[01:19] <xhaker> doko, my eclipse changes seem to have gone ok. still, building amd64 on the ppa system failed, but i'm almost sure it has nothing to do with my changes
[01:20] <doko> url?
[01:20] <xhaker> i snipped that bit of the log where it fails
[01:20] <xhaker> http://pastebin.com/m1f671713
[01:21] <xhaker> https://launchpad.net/~xhaker/+archive
[01:23] <vil> do we still care about gcj native compilation (aot_compile)?
[01:24] <vil> anyway the fail might be of interrest for gcj mailinglist
[01:25] <xhaker> vil, i think the error may be related to it being a xen enabled box
[01:25] <xhaker> i don't think my changes would produce that kind of error
[01:25] <vil> ok
[01:26] <xhaker> vil, do you happen to have access to a ppc box?'
[01:27] <xhaker> I've tried to fix the ppc FTBFS, but would like to test it before bugging someone to upload
[01:27] <vil> I remember a situation, where there was a bug in gcj preventing me from building eclipse using -source 1.3 switch
[01:27] <vil> so I thought this might be similar
[01:27] <xhaker> vil, let me show you the debdiff i prepared
[01:28] <vil> xhaker, try ask imbrandon, he provided a few different boxes for building
[01:28] <xhaker> vil, http://pastebin.com/m1b17c912
[01:28] <vil> also can't you use launchpad PPA? although I have no experience with that 
[01:29] <xhaker> vil, i did use launchpads ppa. it failed on amd64 there
[01:29] <xhaker> but i386 built fine
[01:29] <xhaker> they don't have ppc machines for ppa
[01:30] <xhaker> s/4.1/4.2
[01:31] <vil> http://www.mail-archive.com/ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com/msg01279.html
[01:31] <vil> xhaker, try asking imbrandon or ajmitch
[01:32] <vil> the diff looks fine to me
[01:32] <xhaker> vil, even the 4.1 -> 4.2 change?
[01:32] <xhaker> do you think it might bring problems in other archs?
[01:33] <xhaker> i'm going to build eclipse on my amd64 now
[01:33] <vil> xhaker, no idea, doko understands gcj
[09:02] <xhaker> doko, do you happen to know if there is a eclipse 3.3 tarball? vil was working on it afaik
[09:03] <xhaker> doko, tarball as in for the deb packaging
[09:03] <doko> xhaker: no, I didn't follow eclipse
[09:04] <xhaker> thanks anyway :)
[09:05] <tmarble> doko: can you tell me if https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103384 is still a bug? does the manpage need to have NAME or ".RS 3" fixed?
[09:07] <doko> tmarble: I think for every release before feisty, it comes out as a "bug"
[09:07] <tmarble> so the man-db fix is "the" fix?  upstream man maintainer is asking what he should change
[09:35] <doko> tmarble: no, just move the one section up, I think
[09:37] <doko> tmarble: what was the report number?
[09:40] <tmarble> doko: 103384
[09:41] <doko> tmarble: "To side-step the bug, he man page should put the text below "orbd \- The Object Request Broker Daemon" in a section other than NAME."
[09:42] <tmarble> doko: ok, thx
[09:42] <doko> so the engineer didn't read the bug report ;)
[09:43] <tmarble> hehe... supposedly he did, but maybe he didn't grok it!
[10:00] <xhaker> vil
[10:00] <xhaker> what about that eclipse 3.3 tarball?
[10:02] <xhaker> vi1, i'm asking because a guy from ubuntu motu is probably trying to make a package
[10:03] <vi1> hi xhaker
[10:03] <vi1> it is ready, but I don't have a place to publish it
[10:03] <vi1> I can send it anywher
[10:04] <xhaker> ok
[10:04] <xhaker> i'll setup something
[10:14] <xhaker> vi1, did you see the pm?
[10:15] <vi1> xhaker, yes
[11:10] <vi1> xhaker, uploaded
[11:10] <xhaker> vi1, thanks
[11:11] <xhaker> vi1, i've moved it into the tmp directory so that it is accessible through the link http://www.leetcorp.net/tmpfiles/
[11:11] <vi1> np