[01:15] Ubulette: Thanks. [01:15] I'll merge in xul.trunk before we do a new ppa update [01:15] and in gp a8 when it's released [01:16] well... no ppa for ppc [01:16] hmm [01:20] You know, I've been thinking about that. They could set up a mol instance. :) (mol = mac on linux, which can run linux) [01:21] who ? [01:21] ppa guys ? [01:21] For powerpc, there is a program like vmware/kvm for x87, that allows you to run OS X/Linux inside Linux. [01:21] Yes, the ppa guys., [01:21] THey use xen for amd64/i386, and mol could provide a similar closed environment for building... [01:22] yep. would be nice [01:22] Yeah. [01:23] But theres also the chance that they only want supported arches for PPAs. [01:47] TheMuso, i pushed to gp too. rev 63. At least we're sure it will not be forgotten ;) [01:49] Ok. [02:51] Ubulette: All seems fine here. Just finished building a patched alpha7 on ppc, and am using it successfully. [02:51] good === wfarr [n=wfarr@adsl-61-114-91.asm.bellsouth.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [04:30] anyone know why the I can't install the packages from the mozillateam PPA? it says there's no installation candidate available =/ [04:31] why I can't** [04:39] wfarr: which one? [04:39] never mind - I just saw that (for whatever reason), the PPA repository doesn't build firefox-trunk binaries [04:40] so I'll just grab the dsc and build my own package I suppose [10:41] 88887777999~7999999~7999/c [10:41] ugh [10:44] TheMuso: is that a pass? [10:44] :) [10:44] asac: Its called my screen reader playing funky behavior with me. :) [10:45] asac: But I told Ubulette that my patch worked locally. I was able to run a patched alpha7 ubuntu deb. [11:04] ok fine ... i guess he already added that to trunk, right? === jbs [n=Bernardo@84.39.99.236] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === jbs is now known as Bernardo [11:20] I think so. === jbs [n=Bernardo@84.39.65.91] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === jbs is now known as Bernardo [11:54] hi [11:54] hi [11:54] asac, i've applied the ppc patch to xul.dev and gp [11:55] asac, i'm running dev with the additional extensions, seems fine but no different from before [11:56] asac, and I get some errors: http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/Error-Console.png [12:40] Ubulette: did those pop up because of the new extensions? === asac_ [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === bluekuja [n=and@ubuntu/member/bluekuja] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [05:11] hjmf: hey ... do you have a few examples at hand users could properly retrace, while we/apport couldn't do that? === bluekuja [n=and@ubuntu/member/bluekuja] has left #ubuntu-mozillateam [] === cwong1 [i=chatzill@nat/intel/x-fa17167edd2ab904] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === bluekuja [n=and@host210-174-dynamic.50-82-r.retail.telecomitalia.it] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [07:53] hi back [07:54] asac, i expected at least to see venkman in ff3, nothing [07:55] Ubulette: in? why in? its an extension i guess. [07:55] i think it could either be bundled in, or out as an addon [07:56] well, it's not clear === Bernardo [n=Bernardo@89-180-93-65.net.novis.pt] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === Ubulette [n=Ubulette@APuteaux-153-1-83-24.w86-205.abo.wanadoo.fr] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === bluekuja [n=and@host17-238-dynamic.6-79-r.retail.telecomitalia.it] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [08:52] asac, it's seems venkman is properly installed in xul now. what's missing is the ui link in ff3 calling the proper .js [09:35] ui link? [09:35] hmm [09:36] maybe the extension is not properly registered in firefox at all when you have a xul extension? [09:51] asac, no link, i just read the code and checked my newly installed xul [10:04] Ubulette: is the venkman extension in /usr/lib/xulrunner/extensions ? [10:06] asac, /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9a8pre/extensions/{f13b157f-b174-47e7-a34d-4815ddfdfeb8}/chrome/venkman.jar [10:06] ok [10:06] is firefox listed as a compatible app in install.rdf? [10:07] /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9a8pre/extensions/{f13b157f-b174-47e7-a34d-4815ddfdfeb8}/install.rdf [10:08] yep [10:08] [10:08] [10:08] [10:08] [10:08] [10:08] [10:10] 3.0 hmmm is 3.0 > 3.0a8pre ? [10:10] ok then try to link the extension to the paradiso/extensions dir [10:10] Ubulette: no idea how they match version [10:10] but give it a try [10:10] could be true ;) === shirish [n=shirish@59.95.0.103] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [10:13] hey guys anybody up? [10:13] yop [10:13] hi Ubulette :) [10:14] Ubulette: how can one know that one script is python or not? Is there anyway to find out? [10:14] Ubulette: apart from the name something.py, is there any other way to know the difference? [10:15] file [10:15] Ubulette: what do you mean by file? [10:16] forget it. doesn't work if the py has been "unshebanged" [10:17] well, try "file foo.py" [10:17] Ubulette: what's "unshebanged" [10:17] shebang stripped off [10:18] shirish, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shebang_(Unix) [10:20] Ubulette: did it help?` [10:20] ? [10:20] extensions ;) [10:20] linking ? no [10:21] it should be registered [10:21] he? [10:21] and fixing maxVersion? [10:26] asac, i meant http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/Chrome-Registration-Failed.png [10:30] Ubulette: what's the url for gstreamer that you were saying yestererday, the repository you have [10:30] there's a mini repo called gstreamer0.10 [10:31] ok got it [10:40] looks a bit like ffox cannot register because it doesn't have write permissions? [10:41] you see anything in strace? [10:44] it fails to open .../chrome/icons/default/*.xpm [10:46] hmmm looks for icons in xulrunner chrome? [10:46] or paradiso chrome [10:46] ? [10:46] i doubt that this is the problem [10:47] maybe it just probes for icons in xul dir first [10:47] 16404 open("/usr/lib/firefox-trunk/extensions/{f13b157f-b174-47e7-a34d-4815ddfdfeb8}/chrome.manifest", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_EXCL|O_TRUNC|O_LARGEFILE, 0644) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied) [10:47] looks like a bug [10:47] it should do the same in the profile dir ... not the APPDIR [10:48] but maybe its just a probe again? [10:48] that when the popup 1st appear [10:48] that's === jbs [n=Bernardo@89-180-93-65.net.novis.pt] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [10:49] Ubulette: is that with or without link? [10:49] with [10:49] without link ... what happens? [10:49] no pop-up at all? [10:50] without, nothing [10:50] 16404 open("/usr/lib/firefox-trunk/update.test", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_EXCL|O_TRUNC|O_LARGEFILE, 0644) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied) [10:50] 16404 open("/usr/lib/firefox-trunk/extensions/{f13b157f-b174-47e7-a34d-4815ddfdfeb8}/chrome.manifest", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_EXCL|O_TRUNC|O_LARGEFILE, 0644) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied) [10:50] 16404 open("/usr/lib/firefox-trunk/extensions/{f13b157f-b174-47e7-a34d-4815ddfdfeb8}/chrome.manifest", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_EXCL|O_TRUNC|O_LARGEFILE, 0644) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied) [10:51] that's grep EACCES [10:51] hmmm ... i think you tested but what happens without link and fixed maxVersion? [10:51] (just to be sure before moving ahead ;)) [10:52] hmm, is our ff trunk recognized as id ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384 ? [10:52] look into application.ini [10:53] i think thats the place were its defined [10:53] yep, it is [10:54] well i really think its a bug then [10:54] I bumped max to 4.0 [10:54] 16556 open("/usr/lib/firefox-trunk/update.test", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_EXCL|O_TRUNC|O_LARGEFILE, 0644) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied) [10:54] 16556 open("/usr/lib/firefox-trunk/extensions/{f13b157f-b174-47e7-a34d-4815ddfdfeb8}/chrome.manifest", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_EXCL|O_TRUNC|O_LARGEFILE, 0644) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied) [10:54] 16556 open("/usr/lib/firefox-trunk/extensions/{f13b157f-b174-47e7-a34d-4815ddfdfeb8}/chrome.manifest", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_EXCL|O_TRUNC|O_LARGEFILE, 0644) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied) [10:54] 16556 open("/usr/lib/firefox-trunk/update.test", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_EXCL|O_TRUNC|O_LARGEFILE, 0644) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied) [10:54] 16556 mkdir("/usr/lib/firefox-trunk/extensions/{f13b157f-b174-47e7-a34d-4815ddfdfeb8}-trash", 0755) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied) [10:54] maybe try to move the extension to the trunk dir (instaed of linking) [10:54] 16556 open("/usr/lib/firefox-trunk/update.test", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_EXCL|O_TRUNC|O_LARGEFILE, 0644) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied) [10:55] well, putting it in xul is supposed to allow sharing between all xul apps [10:56] seems we need to chromereg it [10:59] oh no [10:59] please no chrome reg [10:59] i think its a bug [10:59] at least i hope it is === Paddy_EIRE [n=patrick@78.144.25.19] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === jbs_ [n=Bernardo@89-180-93-65.net.novis.pt] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [11:12] mozilla bug 392475 [11:12] Mozilla bug 392475 in JavaScript Debugger "Build Venkman as an extension for XUL (toolkit) based apps" [Normal,Reopened] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392475 [11:13] mozilla bug 371671 [11:13] Mozilla bug 371671 in JavaScript Debugger "Use manifests in Venkman when building with Suiterunner" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=371671 === jbs_ is now known as Bernardo [11:14] lol, patch landed today [11:15] hmm, did my bot build before of after the commit... good question [11:21] hmm, fix not committed yet [11:51] so it was not landed (even though comment claims it is?) [11:51] just committed as Bug 371671: prebuild chrome.manifest on compile; r=gijs [11:51] k [11:52] was supposed to be committed hours ago [11:54] basically, this all seems to be a wip [11:54] http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/weirdal/archives/018483.html [11:54] http://www.gijsk.com/blog/2007/09/venkman-rescue-meeting/ [11:55] bot rebuilding.... [12:00] asac, no news of gnomefreak ? [12:00] no :( [12:10] asac, btw, in xul, we only have venkman and inspector installed, not the other ones [12:12] Ubulette: you mean make install doesn't install the other extensions in the extensions/ folder? [12:14] yes. only those two in mozilla/dist/xulrunner/extensions [12:26] asac, those other ones didnt pass the xpi-stage === zxz [n=zxz@modemcable023.30-56-74.mc.videotron.ca] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === zxz is now known as mertiki [12:34] asac : are-you there? [01:07] asac, yeaaaaahhh, i've got venkman working :)