/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2007/09/12/#ubuntu-artwork.txt

=== PWill [n=paul@unaffiliated/pwill] has joined #ubuntu-artwork
=== Seveas [n=seveas@ubuntu/member/seveas] has joined #ubuntu-artwork
=== yharrow [n=sysadmin@unaffiliated/yharrow] has joined #ubuntu-artwork
=== kwwii [n=kwwii@p549558D2.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-artwork
=== bersace [n=bersace@did75-13-82-243-217-90.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-artwork
=== andreasn [n=andreas@90-227-183-136-no128.tbcn.telia.com] has joined #ubuntu-artwork
=== lapo [n=lapo@host102-254-static.189-82-b.business.telecomitalia.it] has joined #ubuntu-artwork
lapohi11:59
=== kwwii -> lunch
nothlitlapo: do you have anything cooking for -buntu?12:25
laponothlit: I'm just restructuring tangerine-icon-theme a bit12:29
nothlitno additions/modifications at all?12:33
laponothlit: I'd like to cover all the icons in the default install menus at least12:35
lapochange the computer monitors to something similar to the new default bg which is not defined yet12:35
lapothat's mostly the plan12:35
nothlitcool12:36
nothlitis sabdfl anywhere close to moving away from his human iconset?12:37
lapono idea12:37
lapoI hope so tho :-)12:38
kwwiihi guys01:41
kwwiiI think that if anything, we will re-work the human icons, not replace them with tango or such01:41
kwwiithe biggest thing against tango at this point is that it is basically a Novell thing and as a different product and company we want our own look and that has to be somewhat different than what the other companies products are making01:42
andreasnthe style guidelines or tango-icon-theme?01:53
andreasnthe style guidelines more turned into more of a gnome thing than a novell thing at this point01:53
andreasnand quite a number of application developers have picked it up, so in case you select a "unique look", you'll have the drawback that you always have to play catch up and look incomplete, and that's kind of unprofessional01:55
andreasnso if you decide to redo human, leaning a bit closer towards the tango style guidelines might be a good idea01:56
nothlityou wouldn't need the guidelines necessarily, just a general semicompatible look01:57
andreasnor oxygen maybe, guess they both look the same more or less01:57
andreasnnothlit: yeah, perhaps01:59
andreasnI guess it would be a good thing to be able to point a ISV to a document and say "well, if you do your interface like this, it will look good on other distros as well"02:00
andreasnbut I guess I do too much ISV-work, so this is just from my point of view02:00
andreasnI guess a distro that wants to brand itself have other priorities02:00
nothlitis there any kubuntu-specific iconset actually?02:03
andreasnwell, crystal, but that's not kubuntu specific02:03
andreasnor oxygen I gues02:03
andreasns02:03
kwwiireading back....02:09
kwwiiandreasn: agreed, I think the guidelines would need to be followed in future sets to fit in well02:10
kwwiinothlit: no there is no kubuntu specific icon set, we stick to exactly what upstream kde uses02:11
andreasnsounds good, then you would have control over your own base set, while still fitting in with all the other stuff02:11
kwwiiwell, we do have 2-3 icons with a kubuntu logo pasted on top of them, but they are stock icons02:11
kwwiiandreasn: exactly02:11
andreasnthat would sooo much make my job a better place02:11
kwwiiandreasn: in addition the tango guidelines are the best starting point I know of to point people at saying "this is the best way to make good icons"02:12
andreasnjimmac did quite a good work on those, really simple for people to follow it seems02:12
andreasnwell, anyway, I better get back to work02:13
kwwiiit makes working with third-party icon designers much easier (especially those who have never made icons before)02:13
nothlitandreasn: the whole page is good, the examples and illustrations bolster its effectiveness a lot imo02:13
kwwiiyeah, have fun02:13
andreasnfun and fun ;)02:13
andreasnnah, some of it is pretty fun actually02:13
andreasnsome is not :)02:13
kwwiithey would not pay you to do it if it was always fun ;-)02:14
andreasnso true02:14
laponot so true, they will continue paying andreasn 'cause he is good, if you're not good guidelines are not usefull :-)03:14
andreasnlapo: oh, I was referring to some print work I'm working on03:15
lapokwwii: as I said a several time, tango is not a novell thing anymore, and everything something which integrate nicelly with it is a waste of time imho, since you should just use tango style03:16
lapobut mark is the one who pays the bills so he has the right to choose watherever he like03:16
lapoeven if it *not the right thing to do, as in this case03:17
nothlittango is more a clarity and consistency guideline than an artwork style, i know some people prefer being more experimental03:17
=== axxium [n=axxium@ip70-189-42-99.lf.br.cox.net] has joined #ubuntu-artwork
andreasnwell, that's what we talked about, basing a set upon the guidelines03:17
laponothlit: that's the problem of icons in oss03:18
laponothlit: following tango style will make your icons integrate nicelly with the rest, if you want to do different things you can, but you know that it will eventually look out of place in a gnome desktop for example03:19
andreasnwell, we made stuff more themable (in epiphany, evince etc.) so that you could throw you in you more experimental stuff, hopefully you can have something more sane for the default03:20
nothliti think its great that FOSS icons are far more consistent than windows'03:20
lapoimho human doesn't integrate nicelly with the rest of gnome icons and it's a mishmash of style that I can't stand. So we have tangerine which follows ubuntu colors more or less and integrate better with the rest, but if you can stand the mishmash and you like it you should just use it :-)03:20
nothlitbut not having only tango out there is important :P03:20
laponothlit:. sure, but the price you pay having something different is polishness and integratio with the rest of the desktop03:21
laponaturally you could dream of doing all the icons, but you'd need at least 5 designers working on it for several mounths03:22
nothlitnothing wrong with a little bit of diversity available, tango is becoming the standard with other styles being extra anyways03:22
andreasnnothlit: yeah, and that's why stuff are more themeable now03:23
nothlitit'd be cool if we could find a compromise for ubuntu in between03:23
nothlitimo, i know you two love tango03:23
andreasnwell, love and love03:24
andreasnit makes my job easier03:24
laponothlit: I don't love tango I think it has its quick, but you I love coherence and polishness, and you haven't any other choice03:24
andreasnso it's not like "hi! I need you to draw icons for our gnu/linux software, but you have to make 11 sets, one for each distro"03:25
lapoI know how hard is doing a whole theme covering all the naming specs base set, and it's even not enough to have a consistent ui03:25
lapoto have something "mac grade" polished, the base set coverage is roughly less then half of the icons needed03:26
laposo the smartest thing to do for ubuntu will be to leave gnome style alone and just accept upstream decision, as they do with kde03:27
lapoanyway I'm not the boss there and I already told mark he is wasting time and money with human :-)03:28
nothlitubuntu at the minimum needs the palette change lol03:28
laponothlit: brown was a brilliant idea, 'cause it's unique even if it's not something everybody like, but especially with graphics you can't really please everybody03:29
laposo a strong decision was ok there03:29
lapomy point is that it's silly to do branding with ui elements (icons specifically)03:30
nothlitnothing wrong with brown, just unfortunate combinations earlier03:30
lapoand I think it's damaging the gnome desktop actually for the ISV problem andreasn decribed03:30
nothlitthats where branding has the largest effect on the masses though03:31
laponothlit: you can have branding being tango style changing just a bunch of icons03:31
laponothlit: introducing another style with palette and guideliness for a lot of them is not usefull, not working and dangerous03:32
laponothlit: look at bluecurve which is a great piece of artwork and it's the most complete theme around03:32
lapoif you use bluecurve you have a messy ui, since it doesn't integrate with the rest, and as complete as the theme can be it cannot really cover every icon around03:33
lapohuman not even as good as bluecurve03:33
lapoanyway, I have work to do :-)03:33
andreasnrambling you :)03:34
lapoandreasn: I should write all this stuff somewhere and just post the links, I'm saying the same sh*t over and over and over :-))03:34
nothlitsure, but they haven't planned any compatibility with tango at all03:34
laponothlit: my point is that you cannot03:35
=== hfwilke [n=hwilke_@gateway.grayinsco.com] has joined #ubuntu-artwork
andreasnlapo: like a manifest?03:35
andreasn:)03:35
laponothlit: you can reach a level of integration, say like 80% which is not enough to my eyes to have a consistent desktop, if you want 100% you need to be tango style03:35
lapoat least in a gnome environment03:36
laponothlit: tangerine was just a demostration so we didn't put much efforts in it, it's mostly 4 or 5 original icons and some recolored or mixed stuff03:36
laponothlit: but with, say a folder design, the tangerine hw design (copied by human) and some other bits here and there, you'll have a tango style branded theme03:37
andreasnthat would be kind of neat to run as a project for the next release03:38
lapoquite easy to do, better results, better integration, less efforts to produce it then the human mishmash (read less money)03:38
lapoandreasn: it's something I wanted to do for this one, but I was taken away by g-i-t03:38
andreasnyou did totally great work on g-i-t though!03:39
lapothanks, you helped there so congrats yourself as well :-)03:39
andreasnreminds me that I need to send some highcontrast stuff to luca today03:39
andreasneven though it's probably to late to put into 2.2003:39
lapofrankly speaking tho, I could produce something nice for ubuntu, but thinking of having it relegated to a fallback theme it's an energy stop03:40
laposo focusing on upstream is better, since it will be good anyone and not just a subset of ubuntu users03:40
andreasnyeah, I feel that too03:40
nothlitlapo: could be an independently released theme if not adopted immediately03:42
laponothlit: I'm interested in solving ui problems not in making good looking icon themes03:43
laponothlit: the most difficult thing for g-i-t was not drawing the icons, that's the legwork, but finding good metaphors03:44
nothlitthere were metaphors not already solved by tango?03:46
nothliti didn't know there was so much g-i-t handled on its own03:46
laponothlit: tango-icon-theme is untouched since an year or so03:48
=== Skiessi [n=qwe@dsl-roibrasgw1-fe88fb00-133.dhcp.inet.fi] has joined #ubuntu-artwork
=== yharrow [n=sysadmin@unaffiliated/yharrow] has joined #ubuntu-artwork
kwwiilapo: my point is this: which distributions ship with tango?04:58
kwwiias default, I mean04:59
=== yharrow_mobile [n=sysadmin@unaffiliated/yharrow] has joined #ubuntu-artwork
lapokwwii: debian?05:03
lapokwwii: novell ships tango-icon-theme as default with some novell tweaking05:05
lapokwwii: I'm talking about gnome-icon-theme, which is gnome *upstream* default05:06
laposo atm ubuntu is not a "pure" reference gnome distro, as kubuntu is for kde for example05:07
andreasnfedora05:13
andreasnforesight05:13
kwwiilapo: right, and ubuntu was not meant to be that - that is what gobuntu is for, I think05:14
kwwiimy point is that because novell is the only big distro to ship (and make) tango icons I do not think that anyone else is interested in shipping them as default05:15
kwwiianyway05:15
kwwiitime for basketball05:15
andreasnubuntu studio05:16
andreasnyeah, let's continue this some other day05:16
andreasnxubuntu05:17
andreasnhm, I wish I was better at distros05:17
=== sysadmin [n=sysadmin@143.sub-70-202-213.myvzw.com] has joined #ubuntu-artwork
lapokwwii: make? I'm not from novell :-)05:37
lapokwwii: and I'm not looking for a job, so I can be an ass w/o too many problems :-)05:38
lapokwwii: anyway I'm not interested about discussing this stuff, I prefer to produce then talk, but what you're saying is untrue at least05:46
lapoand the perception you have about tango is wrong, yes probably t was started by novell and there were some secret goals I'm not aware about, but now tango style is what upstream gnome choosed and it's the direction other gnome application (not only gnome) are following05:48
lapoand the only novell guy nowdays working on tango project itself is jakub, which is even the only one still in novell from the initial tango project theme05:48
laposo it should be the right time to stop this stupid novell paranoia05:49
=== lapo shut up, really this time :-)
=== hfwilke [n=hwilke_@gateway.grayinsco.com] has left #ubuntu-artwork ["Leaving"]
=== zAo^ [n=ask@ip565eef79.direct-adsl.nl] has joined #ubuntu-artwork
kwwiilapo: all I pointed out was the Novell is the biggest/only commercial distro which ships Tango itself by default. That is the main reason why we want to use a slightly different icon set - it helps us stand out and increases our branding awareness07:30
kwwiiI agree completely with creating icons using the tango guidelines as a starting point07:30
kwwiithis was not my decision to begin with, nor can I change it overnight07:31
=== yharrow_mobile [n=sysadmin@unaffiliated/yharrow] has joined #ubuntu-artwork
lapokwwii: I never said to use tango icon theme (which is just an example implementation of the guidelines..blah, blah, blah) as a default, I'm only talking (as I ever did) about using something which follows the tango guidelines, as fedora, debian, <insert a random gnome distro here> are doing (doing the right thing even)08:02
lapoanyway I'm sick about saying the same thing over and over so I'll quit di discussion, sorry08:03
=== yharrow [n=sysadmin@unaffiliated/yharrow] has joined #ubuntu-artwork
=== sysadmin [n=sysadmin@154.sub-70-202-213.myvzw.com] has joined #ubuntu-artwork
=== yharrow [n=sysadmin@unaffiliated/yharrow] has joined #ubuntu-artwork
=== Skiessi [n=qwe@dsl-roibrasgw1-fe88fb00-133.dhcp.inet.fi] has joined #ubuntu-artwork
=== axxium [n=axxium@ip70-189-42-99.lf.br.cox.net] has joined #ubuntu-artwork
andreasnkwwii, lapo: so you both agree more or less :)10:18
kwwiiandreasn: yeah, that is what I thought too :-)10:18
andreasn:)10:20
andreasnI saw the window decorations nuno did on his blog the other day, those looked pretty neat10:20
kwwiiI am kinda worried that the oxygen style will not have enough contrast...time will tell10:21
andreasnyeah, I was thinking that as well, makes great screenshots though :)10:21
andreasnor do you mean overall with the icon set as well?=10:21
kwwiimore just the styles and the window deco - the icons are perfect, of course :D10:22
kwwiis/styles/style10:22
andreasnof course, and you're not biased at all ;)10:23
andreasnso, yeah, time will tell, good to experiment though10:23
kwwiime?! no, not at all10:23
kwwiimaybe I should put the oxygen icons in ubuntu too!!!10:23
kwwiijust to hear people scream10:24
andreasnhaha10:24
kwwiiI bet if I did that people would complain a lot less about the human icons ;-)10:27
=== axxium [n=axxium@ip70-189-42-99.lf.br.cox.net] has left #ubuntu-artwork ["Leaving"]
=== alex-weej [n=alex@cpc2-darl3-0-0-cust237.midd.cable.ntl.com] has joined #ubuntu-artwork

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!