[12:55] <ubotu> New bug: #139492 in launchpad "Failed build email is misleading over control file lists section" [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/139492
[01:00] <ubotu> New bug: #139495 in launchpad "Beta testers are redirected even when logged out" [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/139495
[01:26] <dthacker> hi, did PPA 101 get logged somewhere?
[01:27] <laga> dthacker: http://tinyurl.com/72w39 ?
[01:27] <dthacker> laga: thank you!
[08:03] <StevenK> How do I go about getting the packages removed from my PPA?
[08:37] <carlos> morning
[08:37] <BjornT> StevenK: atm i think it's quite hard even for the admins to remove packages from PPA. what's the reason you want to remove them?
[08:37] <BjornT> StevenK: (they are working on making it possible to remove packages yourself)
[08:39] <StevenK> BjornT: The reason is because the packages are now available in Gutsy directly
[08:42] <poolie> hi
[08:42] <poolie> would anyone like to fix bug 129778 for me for fix-it-friday?
[08:43] <poolie> it seems like it should be trivial
[08:43] <BjornT> StevenK: ok. would it be a real problem keeping the packages in your PPA for a while, or can you wait until they made it possible to remove packages?
[08:43] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 129778 in launchpad "bad coloring in milestone page" [Medium,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/129778
[08:43] <poolie> and it niggles me whenever i look at a bug list
[08:43] <BjornT> StevenK: if you can't wait, you could try filing a question at https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/soyuz/+addquestion (or talk to cprov on IRC)
[08:45] <BjornT> poolie: i think mpt is the best person to decide which colors to use, and he's not here atm
[08:46] <poolie> BjornT: i guess he's left for the week
[08:46] <poolie> i think basically someone forgot this when 'triaged' was added
[08:47] <poolie> i can assign it to him if you like
[08:50] <BjornT> poolie: yes, please assign it to him. to me it's not clear if triaged should have the same color as confirmed, or yet another color.
[08:51] <poolie> k
[08:51] <poolie> but you agree it's not black?
[08:51] <poolie> i mean, shouldn't be black
[09:00] <BjornT> poolie: yes i agree, it shouldn't be black
[10:05] <ubotu> New bug: #139550 in soyuz "sync-source.py broke: column "published" does not exist " [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/139550
[12:01] <ubotu> New bug: #139568 in rosetta "Directly set property values instead of using methods in GettextPOImporter, MozillaXpiImporter" [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/139568
[12:34] <Kmos> OOPS-622EA31
[12:34] <Kmos> https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/geneweb -> when trying to open this
[12:53] <^^MAg^^> hi,i've got problem with PPA
[12:53] <^^MAg^^> Rejected:
[12:53] <^^MAg^^> Unable to find libopensync-plugin-kdepim_0.19.orig.tar.gz in upload or distribution.
[12:53] <^^MAg^^> Files specified in DSC are broken or missing, skipping package unpack verification.
[12:53] <^^MAg^^> i just used dput with .changes file
[12:57] <laga> ^^MAg^^: did you upload the orig.tar.gz?
[01:07] <^^MAg^^> hmm nope, i thoughy it was done automaticly
[01:07] <laga> when you're building your source package
[01:07] <^^MAg^^> dput only takes .changes file as argument
[01:08] <laga> you need to run debuild -S -sa
[01:08] <laga> the -sa is the important bit
[01:08] <^^MAg^^> ah
[01:08] <^^MAg^^> ok
[01:08] <laga> it'll include the orig.tar.gz in the upload then
[01:08] <^^MAg^^> uhm, os there a way to remove currently uploaded version from PPA ?
[01:08] <^^MAg^^> s/os/is/
[01:09] <laga> no
[01:09] <laga> re-upload with a newer version number
[01:24] <^^MAg^^> hmm i got mail that it was accepted, but id does not show on my ppa page
[01:24] <^^MAg^^> a ok, it's not in build records but it's on the main page
[01:24] <laga> ^^MAg^^: it takes some time. wait for a few hours
[01:24] <laga> ah, godo :)
[01:25] <laga> good*
[01:26] <^^MAg^^> 1 Sources (400.3 KiB)
[01:26] <^^MAg^^> 0 Binaries (0 bytes)
[01:28] <Fujitsu> Builds should appear within a couple of minutes.
[01:29] <Fujitsu> If not already.
[01:30] <mwh> hm
[01:31] <mwh> running the upgrade to gutsy in parallels when the host system is short on disk space --> excitement
[01:37] <jwendell> Hi, folks
[01:38] <jwendell> i have an issue on bug #57803. I don't know if it's a launchpad's bug or feature ;)
[01:38] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 57803 in xorg "xorg.conf has wrong font paths, resulting in failure to find some fonts (dup-of: 63408)" [Low,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/57803
[01:38] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 63408 in xorg "failing to find fonts: dexconf writes bogus FontPaths" [High,Fix released]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/63408
[01:39] <jwendell> someone has added vino to that bug, and i've invalidated it. But i'm still getting mails from that bug, as i'm a bug contact for vino
[01:41] <^^MAg^^> do you plan some button like "Hey we found the fix, if you are the maintainer of this package wake up!" ?
[01:45] <kiko> jwendell, it's a known bug that we still email contacts for invalidated tasks
[01:46] <Fujitsu> ^^MAg^^: We don't have maintainers in Ubuntu, as such. You want to follow the sponsorship process, asking in #ubuntu-motu is probably the best idea.
[01:46] <jwendell> kiko, ah ok, thanks
[01:46] <kiko> jwendell, one question is whether you wouldn't want to listen if somebody says "no, this isn't invalid!!"
[01:46] <kiko> jwendell, I think in that case we might need to change the UI to not give the impression someone'd be paying attention, IYKWIM
[01:47] <jwendell> kiko, yeah, that's a problem
[01:48] <kiko> I wonder how we'd do that. I mean, we'd remove you from the subscribers portlet...
[01:48] <^^MAg^^> Fujitsu: I mean a situation like bug #134622 - rebuild fixes the main problem but other small issues remain
[01:48] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 134622 in opensync "kitchensync - opensync synchronization crash" [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/134622
[01:48] <kiko> jwendell, maybe that, in conjunction with a warning when adding a comment "This bug has no other subscribers; no-one will be notified of your comment"
[01:49] <kiko> I don't know. users don't read etc.
[01:50] <Fujitsu> ^^MAg^^: Right. Produce a debdiff, subscribe ubuntu-universe-sponsors.
[01:50] <jwendell> kiko, you should do like irc, if someones writes your nickname, the xchat blinks the window
[01:50] <jwendell> kiko, got?
[01:51] <kiko> jwendell, I don't think I understand what you meant. :)
[01:51] <jwendell> kiko, if somebody write any comment, i don't want to be notified by email
[01:52] <jwendell> kiko, but if he tells my name, i want to be notified by mail
[01:52] <kiko> jwendell, /any/ comment?
[01:52] <kiko> heh
[01:52] <kiko> that's an interesting idea. hard to implement, though -- you'd have to match every single word against every person.
[01:52] <jwendell> hehe
[01:53] <jwendell> kiko, maybe a couple of checkbox in the comment area, each one with the name of possible subscribers
[01:54] <jwendell> kiko, if the person wants to call me, he checks my name
[01:54] <jwendell> kiko, of course, there are checkboxes only for subscribers for invalid tasks
[01:54] <jwendell> kiko, the others are notified normally
[01:55] <kiko> jwendell, how do you deal with bugs with 100 subscribers, like bug 1? :)
[01:55] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 1 in ubuntu "Microsoft has a majority market share" [Critical,In progress]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/1 - Assigned to Mark Shuttleworth (sabdfl)
[01:55] <jwendell> kiko, it will be handled as today
[01:55] <jwendell> kiko, we're talking about invalid tasks
[01:56] <kiko> jwendell, oh, only for the contacts of invalid tasks?
[01:56] <jwendell> kiko, yep, only for those people we have checkboxes
[01:57] <kiko> jwendell, I think it's hard for the end-user to make a good decision there
[01:57] <jwendell> kiko, i think too, it would be useful for that case you cited above
[01:57] <jwendell> " one question is whether you wouldn't want to listen if somebody says "no, this isn't invalid!!""
[01:58] <jwendell> kiko, in that case, the person will check my name in checkbox and i will be notified by mail
[01:58] <jwendell> kiko, or even better, the name of invalid task
[01:59] <jwendell> kiko, me, as a bug contact would be notified
[02:02] <kiko> jwendell, well, the user could always just mark the task as valid again, and email you as part of that.
[02:02] <jwendell> kiko, yeah
[02:03] <Fujitsu> If someone was to say it's not invalid, they should be setting it to Incomplete or so anyway.
[02:03] <jwendell> kiko, so, you can safely now start fixing that bug then ;)
[02:04] <kiko> jwendell, actually I was disagreeing with your approach above. :-)
[02:04] <jwendell> hehe
[02:04] <jwendell> kiko, it was just insights hehe
[02:05] <kiko> I think if we made it easy for the person to say "This bug is not Invalid!" all our problems would be solved.
[02:31] <Kopfgeldjaeger> hi
[02:35] <ubotu> New bug: #139593 in launchpad-bazaar ""Permission denied: '/root/.bzr.log'" error from supermirror operations" [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/139593
[03:37] <kro> 0
[03:47] <Le-Chuck_ITA> Hi all
[03:48] <Le-Chuck_ITA> I uploaded to PPA but forgot to put something in the changelog
[03:48] <Le-Chuck_ITA> the only sensible thing to do would be to upload the _same_ version with the right changelog, is this allowed?
[03:55] <cprov> Le-Chuck_ITA: no, the same version won't get published, you have to increase the source version number.
[03:56] <Le-Chuck_ITA> Then, where do I write the missing change?
[03:56] <Le-Chuck_ITA> correct place, in the changelog, would be under the version where I really made the change
[03:56] <Le-Chuck_ITA> should I ignore this, and file it under new release changelog?
[03:57] <cprov> Le-Chuck_ITA: up to you.
[03:57] <cprov> Le-Chuck_ITA: 'your PPA, your rules'
[03:57] <Le-Chuck_ITA> what I mean is, if I write it "below", under the correct version number, will there be any problems later since we have two changelogs that have a "different opinion" about the same version?
[03:58] <Le-Chuck_ITA> cprov: I intend to provide the package to let  people test a bugfix in universe
[03:58] <Le-Chuck_ITA> so it's my PPA, your rules :)
[03:58] <Le-Chuck_ITA> in the sense that I will try to get sponsored for universe
[03:58] <Le-Chuck_ITA> but maybe then I will have to put the version number back to ubuntu?
[03:59] <Le-Chuck_ITA> and, moreover, I forgot to add ~ppa to my version number
[03:59] <Le-Chuck_ITA> so I think I
[03:59] <Le-Chuck_ITA> ... 
[03:59] <Le-Chuck_ITA> made a mess!
[03:59] <cprov> Le-Chuck_ITA: all those issues can be sorted with your sponsor, I don't know the context
[03:59] <jnthnjng> sorry if this sounds impatient (i'm not impatient, just curious), but does anybody know how long I am likely to wait to get approved for launchpad-beta-testers?  I'd like to try out the new PPA stuff.
[04:00] <kiko> mrevell, ^^^
[04:00] <Le-Chuck_ITA> ok cprov, by now I will adjust my changelog as it should have been from the beginning
[04:00] <Le-Chuck_ITA> I think this makes more sense
[04:00] <Le-Chuck_ITA> then I will see with my sponsor when it'll be time
[04:00] <Le-Chuck_ITA> thank you
[04:07] <kcy29581> hi all, I have a query regarding entering and commenting on bugs: what exactly is the "Assigned to" field used for; when should it be used, and when should it not
[04:07] <mrevell> jnthnjng: Hi - I usually approve people within 24 hours of applying. I haven't done a batch today though. Let me take a look
[04:08] <kiko> kcy29581, if you don't know, don't use it. :-)
[04:08] <kiko> kcy29581, seriously, the assignee is the person who is going to fix that issue.
[04:08] <kiko> kcy29581, normally a person self-assigns to a bug. in some less standard situations, other people do allocations -- but that's not very free-software-ish IYKWIM
[04:09] <jnthnjng> mrevell: ok, thanks.  didn't mean to make you do it immediately, was just curious :)
[04:10] <mrevell> jnthnjng: No problem :) I'm happy to do it now.
[04:10] <mrevell> jnthnjng: I can't find a username that looks like it might be you though. What's your Launchpad username?
[04:10] <jnthnjng> Jonathon Jongsma
[04:11] <mrevell> jnthnjng: Ah, JonathOn, not JonathAn
[04:11] <jnthnjng> ah, yes
[04:13] <mrevell> jnthnjng: Right, you're iN! :)
[04:13] <jnthnjng> mrevell: many thanks
[04:13] <mrevell> jnthnjng: no problem :)
[04:25] <kcy29581> thanks for the answers guys
[04:26] <ubotu> New bug: #139606 in launchpad "Launchpad (build 4827) does not collapse quoted text" [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/139606
[04:28] <kcy29581> kiko, that is obvious, yes... however, the reason I'm asking: after responded to a bug I entered, it does not appear in my "List reported bugs" in Launchpad. Anyone know why?
[04:29] <kcy29581> ignore that... after logging in and out, the bug now appears again
[04:29] <kcy29581> sorry guys
[04:30] <kiko> kcy29581, odd. looks like a caching issue, but.. we don't cache those pages.
[04:30] <kcy29581> oh well, it works now, so it's fine. Thanks. :)
[04:31] <kcy29581> Can anyone log in to Launchpad and change the status of any bug? I'm wondering if someone can simply log in and invalidate all the bugs entered!
[04:32] <kcy29581> I would like to understand exactly what the process is when a bug is entered, in order to ensure the right people get the right bugs
[04:36] <kiko> kcy29581, what project are you using LP to track bugs for?
[04:37] <kcy29581> Ubuntu
[04:39] <kcy29581> I use DevTrack at work, and Management have decided to use the "Assigned to" field in a way different to what it should be used for. So I'm wondering how the "Assigned to" field is used in Launchpad
[04:40] <kiko> kcy29581, it's used as "normally" it's used in other bugtrackers -- the person who is going to fix the bug assigns themselves to it.
[04:41] <kiko> kcy29581, if it's for Ubuntu, I think you'd do well to look at the Ubuntu QA documentation.
[04:41] <kcy29581> I will, thanks kiko. Is that found on the main Ubuntu site, in the Development section?
[04:42] <kcy29581> if you know, obviously!
[04:42] <kiko> kcy29581, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuQA
[04:42] <kiko> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToTriage
[04:42] <kiko> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance
[04:43] <kiko> kcy29581, those are good starting points.
[04:44] <kcy29581> thanks a lot kiko
[04:44] <Hobbsee> kiko!
[04:45] <kiko> tis me
[04:45] <Hobbsee> argh!
[04:47] <MiserySalin> hi there
[04:48] <MiserySalin> I wanted to ask how to tell PPA that he can use an original orig.tar.gz from gutsy respo. Error message: "Unable to find wxwidgets2.8_2.8.4.0.orig.tar.gz in upload or distribution.
[04:48] <MiserySalin> I used "debuild -S -sd"
[04:50] <kiko> I don't think we actually look up origs in the main distribution, do we cprov?
[04:50] <Hobbsee> we dont
[04:50] <cprov> kiko: no, we don't
[04:51] <cprov> kiko: users have to provide origs in their first upload
[04:51] <Hobbsee> (unfortunately)
[04:51] <MiserySalin> Well... than the error message is a little bit confusing. :-) But thanks.... 33 MB upload. yeah ;-)
[04:51] <MiserySalin> then
[04:56] <kiko> cprov, should be easy to fix, though.
[04:57] <cprov> kiko: yes, it should
[04:57] <kiko> MiserySalin, can you file a soyuz bug and annotate it with the tag "ppa"
[04:58] <kiko> MiserySalin, and we'll try and get it fixed for the next cycle?
[05:00] <MiserySalin> ok, thanks... I will file a bug for that.
[05:04] <kiko> thanks so much.
[05:06] <ubotu> New bug: #139616 in soyuz "Setup a proper interface for Publisher.Config" [Undecided,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/139616
[05:19] <soren> bazaar.launchpad.net looks b0rken.
[05:19] <soren> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mathiaz/apparmor/ubuntu-mathiaz
[05:19] <soren> case in point ^^
[05:20] <ubotu> New bug: #139619 in soyuz "Allow orig.tar.gz from distribution repos" [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/139619
[05:21] <jtv> soren: strange URL... where does that link come from?
[05:21] <soren> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mathiaz/apparmor/ubuntu-mathiaz
[05:21] <soren> jtv: ^^
[05:22] <soren> What's strange about it?
[05:22] <jtv> Well I don't usually hang out on bazaar.launchpad.net, but usually launchpad uses https not http.
[05:22] <jtv> Oh, I see now
[05:23] <jtv> So what's broken?
[05:24] <soren> Click here: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mathiaz/apparmor/ubuntu-mathiaz   :)
[05:25] <jtv> Yes, that is odd
[05:25] <soren> Yes. Hence "b0rken" :)
[05:25] <jtv> okay okay :)
[05:27] <jtv> soren: I'll see if I can get someone who knows more about bazaar
[05:28] <soren> Wicked.
[05:30] <mthaddon> soren, jtv: I'll check with IS 
[05:30] <soren> Rock.
[05:31] <jtv> mthaddon: thanks
[05:31] <jtv> mthaddon: yet again :0
[05:31] <mthaddon> np
[05:44] <synic> ok... so bzr is definitely down?
[05:46] <mthaddon> soren, should be working now
[05:47] <mthaddon> soren, by which I mean you should be able to branch off that URL
[05:48] <synic> ssh: connect to host bazaar.launchpad.net port 22: Connection refused
[05:48] <synic> is what I'm getting
[05:49] <soren> mthaddon: Yes, it appears to work now.
[05:49] <soren> mthaddon: Thanks.
[05:49] <mthaddon> cool
[05:49] <kiko-phone> synic, mthaddon, mwh: fails for me too
[05:49] <mthaddon> synic, can you try again please (fix just put in place)
[05:50] <synic> same
[05:50] <mthaddon> synic, what command are you using to connect?
[05:51] <synic> Merging from remembered location bzr+ssh://arolsen@bazaar.launchpad.net/~exaile-devel/exaile/main/
[05:51] <synic> ssh: connect to host bazaar.launchpad.net port 22: Connection refused
[05:51] <synic> so just bzr merge
[05:51] <mthaddon> ok, thx - lemme check
[05:53] <superm1> indeed failing for me too
[06:01] <ubotu> New bug: #139633 in launchpad "Linking to bug reports in savannah.gnu.org doesn't work" [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/139633
[06:01] <kiko-phone> dupe!
[06:02] <kiko-phone> kiko@whatever:~$ telnet bazaar.launchpad.net 22
[06:02] <kiko-phone> Trying 91.189.94.254...
[06:02] <kiko-phone> telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused
[06:11] <radix> mwh: fix plz
[06:34] <elmo> fixed
[06:34] <superm1> new host it would appear?
[06:34] <superm1> Warning: Permanently added the RSA host key for IP address '91.189.94.254' to the list of known hosts.
[06:35] <elmo> no, just a new IP
[06:36] <kiko-phone> thanks el
[06:36] <kiko-phone> err
[06:36] <kiko-phone> elmo
[06:46] <superm1> how long does supermirror usually take?  I've had it going here for some 4 min now: Unable to obtain lock lp--1217712948:///lock
[06:46] <superm1> held by supermirror@vostok on host vostok [process #28413] 
[06:46] <superm1> locked 4 minutes, 34 seconds ago
[06:51] <Odd_Bloke> superm1: There's a bug open for this.  I presume you're using bzr+ssh?
[06:51] <superm1> yes
[06:51] <superm1> Odd_Bloke, should I try to bzr break-lock it then?
[06:52] <Odd_Bloke> superm1: Yeah, but try using sftp to do so.
[06:53] <superm1> Odd_Bloke, afterward should i still do my push w/ bzr+ssh://, or just use sftp then?
[06:54] <Odd_Bloke> superm1: I think bzr+ssh should work.
[06:54] <Odd_Bloke> I only baguely remember how to workaround this.
[06:54] <superm1> so i dont supposed your subscribe to the bug and have it handy so i can subscribe to it?
[06:55] <Odd_Bloke> superm1: Not that I recall...
[06:55] <superm1> eh it happened again
[06:56] <Odd_Bloke> superm1: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-bazaar/+bug/125420
[06:56] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 125420 in launchpad-bazaar "supermirror tasking locks?" [Undecided,New]  
[07:00] <superm1> ugh. this is fairly frustrating,  i still can't seem to break that lock.  :)
[07:01] <Odd_Bloke> superm1: Try doing everything over sftp?
[07:01] <superm1> yeah i tried
[07:01] <superm1> i think the problem came from when bazaar.launchpad.net went down earlier, someoen else was doign a bzr+ssh commit
[07:01] <superm1> and i broke that bzr+ssh commit myself with another bzr+ssh
[07:03] <superm1> hm well i'll give it a bit and try this again later i guess
[07:05] <Le-Chuck_ITA> I have a problem with PPA
[07:05] <Le-Chuck_ITA> checking whether build environment is sane... configure: error: newly created file is older than distributed files! Check your system clock make: *** [configure-stamp]  Error 1
[07:05] <Le-Chuck_ITA> somebody knows if that can be my fault?
[07:13] <gnomefreak> Le-Chuck_ITA: is the version you are trying to upload lower than whats on there already?
[07:14] <Le-Chuck_ITA> well, I sent two consecutive versions in a short while
[07:14] <Le-Chuck_ITA> may be it built first the last one
[07:14] <Le-Chuck_ITA> oh no sorry
[07:15] <Le-Chuck_ITA> it's saying so for both versions
[07:16] <Hobbsee> gnomefreak: that looks like during a ./configure, so wouldnt relate to ppa
[07:17] <Le-Chuck_ITA> yes it's in configure
[07:18] <gnomefreak> sorry miss read it and on phone :(
[07:18] <Le-Chuck_ITA> here it is:
[07:18] <Le-Chuck_ITA> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9279930/buildlog_ubuntu-gutsy-amd64.xournal_0.4.0.1ubuntu2_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[07:19] <Le-Chuck_ITA> on a related note, if I write fixes (LP: #xxxxxx) in my changelog on my PPA
[07:19] <Le-Chuck_ITA> does LP close all bug reports that I claim fixed?
[07:19] <Le-Chuck_ITA> or is it dput ?
[07:19] <Hobbsee> lp closes all the bugs
[07:20] <Hobbsee> dput is just an uploader
[07:20] <Le-Chuck_ITA> ok
[07:20] <Hobbsee> hmm.  i wonder if tha't fixed if you make -f Makefile.cvs....
[07:20] <Le-Chuck_ITA> I didn't know that PPA triggers this
[07:20] <Hobbsee> it does at the moment, and it's a bug
[07:20] <gnomefreak> PPA shouldnt should it? 
[07:20] <Le-Chuck_ITA> ah ok
[07:20] <gnomefreak> ah thats why
[07:20] <Le-Chuck_ITA> so I will avoid uploading fixes on PPA
[07:22] <synic> is bzr fixed?
[07:22] <synic> it's just hanging now
[07:26] <Le-Chuck_ITA> gnomefreak: what should I do for my build? I have to make a third upload, though?
[07:27] <gnomefreak> synic: i was just informed it was
[07:27] <Le-Chuck_ITA> I wanted to write "I have to make a third upload, though." without the question mark :)
[07:27] <gnomefreak> Le-Chuck_ITA: not sure fix package than bump version
[07:27] <Le-Chuck_ITA> ok then we'll see if it builds
[07:28] <Le-Chuck_ITA> how do I avoild LP marking bugs as fix released?
[07:28] <Le-Chuck_ITA> is removing lines from changelog the only way?
[07:29] <gnomefreak> Le-Chuck_ITA: yes for now
[07:29] <Le-Chuck_ITA> ok thank you
[07:30] <soren> Le-Chuck_ITA: You can remove the X-Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed from your .changes file, if you're adventurous :)
[07:30] <Le-Chuck_ITA> isn't that signed? no?
[07:30] <Le-Chuck_ITA> maybe not
[07:30] <Le-Chuck_ITA> :)
[07:30] <soren> Sure.
[07:30] <soren> Then you edit it and sign it again.
[07:31] <Le-Chuck_ITA> nah
[07:31] <Le-Chuck_ITA> too adventurous :) I
[07:31] <soren> Heh :)
[07:43] <Le-Chuck_ITA> bye
[07:44] <soren> o/
[07:50] <ubotu> New bug: #139654 in launchpad "Branch-scanner script should report "Failed to scan" as ERROR not INFO" [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/139654
[10:14] <kiko-afk> gnomefreak, we have about 130,000 issues in LP. which one are you talking about?
[10:35] <ubotu> New bug: #139685 in malone "In +txt pages there is no information about activity" [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/139685
[11:39] <gnomefreak> kiko-afk: looked like it was just a long lag before it was updated
[11:51] <gnomefreak> is it possible to subscribe toa  PPA? so i get mail on every upload. its for a team not personal PPA
[11:53] <Rinchen> gnomefreak, I don't think you can do that today but we are considering something like that for the future
[11:54] <gnomefreak> Rinchen: cool ty
[11:54] <Rinchen> and by that I mean I've already put in a request so I can do the same thing :-)
[11:55] <gnomefreak> Rinchen: sweet :)
[11:56] <gnomefreak> now to play with gdm
[11:56] <Rinchen> If you have specific suggestions you can of course file a bug
[11:56] <gnomefreak> Rinchen: so far all that i want is going to be added (or has atleast been thought about)
[11:57] <Rinchen> excellent
[12:06] <gnomefreak> is there a list of requests (wishlist bugs for PPA)
[12:08] <synic> failed to open trace file: [Errno 13]  Permission denied: '/root/.bzr.log'
[12:08] <synic> started getting this when trying any operation on bzr
[12:11] <Rinchen> gnomefreak, you can do a search in Launchpad for the "ppa" tag
[12:11] <Rinchen> synic, if it's a pure bzr comment then #bzr would be the place to ask
[12:11] <synic> dunno if it is or not.  It just suddenly started happening, on all my machines
[12:11] <synic> but I'll ask there
[12:12] <gnomefreak> its bzr i used to get that alot but it just went away one day 
[12:17] <gnomefreak> hmmmmmm
[12:40] <gnomefreak> this is bad