[06:45] <emdash_> nn/win 10
[06:45] <emdash_> gar
[07:36] <slavik> UVF = Upstream Version Freeze?
[07:36] <cjracker> iirc
[07:37] <ScottK> slavik: Yes.
[07:37] <slavik> k
[07:37] <slavik> I had an idea ... dunno if it was though of, but what about alsa-oss package by default and also software mixing for all devices that don't support it?
[08:00] <c1|freaky> if i reported a bug for kernel 2.6.20 on feisty, i upgraded to gutsy now theres 2.6.22 - the bug is about cpu frequency scaling which doesnt work - and i now want to report that this is still not working, can i just post a comment under the bug for 2.6.20 ? or should i file a new bugreport?
[08:02] <slavik> hmm, cpu scaling works here ... (feisty)
[08:02] <slavik> I am on c2q though
[08:03] <c1|freaky> <-- amilo M 1437G gutsy
[08:04] <slavik> what cpu?
[08:04] <c1|freaky> Intel Pentium M - Dothan i think
[08:04] <c1|freaky> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/93331
[08:04] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 93331 in linux-source-2.6.20 "Kernel doesn't scale my CPU." [Medium,Fix released] 
[10:46] <\sh> hmmm...does anyone know what this error message could be?
[10:46] <\sh> Rejected:
[10:46] <\sh> Attempt to upload binaries specifying build 375243, where they don't fit.
[10:46] <siretart> any archive admins around?
[10:46] <siretart> hi \sh!
[10:47] <\sh> moins siretart
[10:49] <Kopfgeldjaeger> hi
[10:51] <siretart> \sh: do you remember who this guy was that was interested in fai in ubuntu?
[10:51] <siretart> avinc something, but I don't remember exactly
[10:52] <\sh> logfiles....
[10:53] <\sh> siretart, when was it?
[10:53] <\sh> alvinc was the nic
[10:53] <siretart> ah, thanks
[10:54] <siretart> do you know him? do you have his email adress?
[10:54] <\sh> http://people.ubuntu.com/~fabbione/irclogs/ubuntu-motu-2007-09-05.html
[10:54] <\sh> nope..
[10:54] <siretart> hm.
[10:55] <siretart> seems to be his lp id as well
[10:55] <siretart> thanks
[11:08] <\sh> hmmm...sending a window to virtual desktop no. doesn't work with compiz...but moving it right or left works...do I miss something?
[11:12] <kylem> win 27
[01:11] <TomaszD> hi. Is it me or is bluez-gnome in gutsy completely different from the standard one? If so, where is the translation for this thing? It seems like a cruel joke when people struggle to keep the standard thing up-to-date and all of a sudden I see a different bluetooth-properties applet where everything is in English despite the fact that bluez-gnome is fully translated into Polish.
[01:12] <TomaszD> Rosetta shows that bluez-gnome is fully translated and that's true, I maintain it upstream.
[01:14] <\sh_away> keescook, thanks for the upload
[01:14] <gnomefreak> noticed gb mirror is down/not grabbing packages
[01:18] <Kmos> TomaszD: I think you need to talk to carlos about that on #launchpad
[01:19] <TomaszD> Kmos, ok thanks
[01:46] <\sh_away> anyone who wants to sponser bug 47232? ;)
[01:46] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 47232 in redland-bindings "example file provided in /usr/share/doc/python2.4-librdf doesn't work" [Medium,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/47232
[04:03] <siretart> any ftp-archive admin around? there are some packages in universe which aren't supposed to be there :/
[05:30] <__pablo__> hello world
[05:30] <__pablo__> exist a plugin in dev for rhytmbox to use tap_eq?
[05:35] <finalbeta> tap_eq?
[05:36] <finalbeta> I'll assume you need equalizing, and thus no
[05:36] <__pablo__> yes
[05:36] <__pablo__> i use it as a plugin for ladspa
[05:36] <__pablo__> but i don't set it in simple way
[05:37] <__pablo__> but in ~/.asoundrc
[05:37] <__pablo__> manually
[05:37] <__pablo__> ps:: excuse me for my english
[05:38] <__pablo__> i think that a plugin to set tap_eq will be very usefull... now my linux box sound very well... but if i need to modify the eq set is problematic
[05:39] <finalbeta> I'm sure everyone agrees to you, and this feature has been requested for years now. Someday...
[05:40] <__pablo__> audacius had this feature... i don't think that is very difficult port it to rhytmbox
[06:26] <ace_suares> Dear ppl, I have severe problems with OO in Kubuntu Feisty. I asked in openoofice.org-devel but they point me back to ubuntu
[06:26] <Hobbsee> !weekend
[06:26] <ubotu> It's a weekend.  Often on weekends, the paid developers, and a lot of the community, may not be around to answer your question.  Please be patient, wait longer than you normally would, or try again during the working week.
[06:26] <ace_suares> I reported the problem extensivly in launchpad but hitherto no answers...
[06:27] <ace_suares> hi Hobbsee
[06:27] <Hobbsee> hi
[06:27] <ace_suares> yes it is weekend....
[06:27] <ace_suares> sweet saturday and my machine hangs and i need to reboot :-(
[06:27] <ace_suares> it seems to be difficult to pinpoint this problem
[06:28] <ace_suares> since it's OO interacting with what not (X ? KDE ?)
[06:28] <ace_suares> and maybe it's a freak thing only to be seen on multihead machines and not all developers have multihead
[06:28] <Riddell> ace_suares: you are yet to say what the problem is
[06:29] <Riddell> calc is the dude for openoffice though
[06:29] <ace_suares> I will paste about 7 lines...
[06:29] <ace_suares> calc: (Thanks ridell)
[06:30] <ace_suares> My openoffice on ubuntu feisty crashes whenver I touch the menu (for instance file) but I can't see how to debug this
[06:30] <ace_suares> it hangs the entire machine and only reboot can save me
[06:30] <ace_suares> I have to to the reboot from another machine via ssh
[06:30] <ace_suares> because everyting hangs, and I can't use my keyboard anymore
[06:30] <ace_suares> furthermore, as soon as the screensaver kicks in, I loose an entore screen on my 3-head machine
[06:30] <ace_suares> and X is just working around it by only using the two screens that did NOT have OO running
[06:31] <ace_suares> ridell: hope this makes sense
[06:51] <FoxII> woo! I'm in
[06:51] <FoxII> Any high up devs here? As In those that are 'permenantly' involved with ubuntu?
[06:53] <keescook> \sh_away: you bet.  thanks for the patches.  :)
[06:54] <Hobbsee> !weekend | FoxII
[06:54] <ubotu> FoxII: It's a weekend.  Often on weekends, the paid developers, and a lot of the community, may not be around to answer your question.  Please be patient, wait longer than you normally would, or try again during the working week.
[06:54] <FoxII> Thank you Hobbsee :)
[06:57] <FoxII> My question is (and I'm willing to wait. I know the time that developers put into this project); The relationship between developers and members who are testing and how the development between the both is not hindered by flaming and/or complaints. I understand fully that both are viable and likely to happen, but I would like to know how this is limited and how the developers keep the testers happy with regard to devel
[06:57] <FoxII> opment, even with development of 'back-end' parts which are not initially included in global updates.
[06:58] <Hobbsee> oh, you're from the forums arent you?
[06:58] <FoxII> If that makes sense. I will try to explain further if possible.
[06:58] <FoxII> yes, Hobbsee, it was suggested to try here for my question to be answered. I hope that is okay :)
[06:59] <Hobbsee> hardly anyone here at this time of night
[06:59] <Hobbsee> it is a weekend, after all
[07:00] <FoxII> Ihm, I understand fully for those that are left. hehe. I can wait for a reply. :)
[07:51] <Doctor_Nick> hey, apparently there was a demo yesterday about using launchpad to create and submit packages, does anyone know where i might find that
[07:54] <beuno> Doctor_Nick, https://help.launchpad.net/PPA101/20070913
[07:55] <Doctor_Nick> thanks
[07:56] <beuno> :D
[10:22] <pygi> siretart, ping if you're here
[10:25] <pygi> ok, you're not :p
[11:19] <okaratas> hello
[11:23] <okaratas> ompaul, hello
[11:25] <ompaul> hi
[12:05] <gnomefreak> will /etc/gdm get regenerated if i rm it when gdm starts after reboot?
[12:09] <mjg59> gnomefreak: No?
[12:09] <gnomefreak> the setting look right but i am still missing gdm menu
[12:10] <gnomefreak> looking to start with clean conf
[12:10] <wasabi> So reinstall the config file.
[12:10] <mjg59> If you delete files in /etc, then in most cases the packaging system will assume that you've done it deliberately and not recreate them
[12:11] <gnomefreak> using --purge didnt change it in any way
[12:11] <wasabi> Uh huh. dpkg -i --force-conf or something
[12:11] <wasabi> --force-confmiss
[12:12] <gnomefreak> said it wasnt empty so not removing so im looking for other choices atm
[12:12] <wasabi> missconf. one of those. it's in the man page, plain as day
[12:26] <gnomefreak> options was there just the screen is too big for the monitor screen, that would explain why xubuntu's login screen worked