[10:00] <fabbione> lamont: i keep rsycing stage0 & co... and it generally happens before I pull from ports
[10:00] <fabbione> lamont: in the worst case is 30 minutes of async
[10:00] <lamont> ok
[10:00] <lamont> I'm pulling LP/gutsy into stage0 as it becomes "better"
[10:02] <jbailey> lamont: I thought you said Adam was building it in the DC?
[10:03] <lamont> adam is a relative term. :-)
[10:03] <fabbione> jbailey: yes, but we are still building locally  while LP stabilize
[10:03] <lamont> LP is building gutsy in the DC.
[10:03] <jbailey> Cool.
[10:03] <lamont> it's deb lines in sources.list point to a clone of gutsy-stage0 in the DC
[10:04] <lamont> at some point (once we catch up), then we'll cut over to just using LP for everything - by publishing a new base chroot for gutsy with better deb lines.
[10:05] <lamont> at the moment, there are some packages in the hppa/gutsy LP archive that are hold-overs from dapper (many), some of those were real packages in dapper, and are provided packages in gutsy.  apt prefers the real package, and it's too old.  If I could remember which ones they were, I'd be happier.
[10:05] <lamont> and sometime this week, I expect that I'll take the time to find them and have someone remove them from gutsy/hppa in LP
[10:06] <jbailey> I'd have thought regular archive maintenance would've picked those all for all arches?
[10:06] <lamont> once they're obsoleted by newer builds, it does.
[10:06] <lamont> but,uh, we haven't been building since dapper.. remember? :-)
[10:07] <lamont> the cleaning happens per-arch
[10:07] <jbailey> Oy.