[01:33] <Ubulette> lp is back
[01:33] <asac>  \o/
[01:46] <Ubulette> ppa failed, i'm still not allowed
[01:47] <Ubulette> btw, i pushed with -si and it failed because of missing tarball, yet it was -2
[01:56] <asac> Ubulette: yes ... you have to us -sa
[01:57] <asac> unless the same tarball is already in ppa
[01:58] <Ubulette> it is
[01:58] <Ubulette> as i didnt bump
[01:59] <Ubulette> anyway, I put the a8 tarball in, bumped changelog and i built just fine
[01:59] <Ubulette> it
[02:05] <Ubulette> asac, we should package xul a8 too
[02:06] <Ubulette> but there's no upstream tarball for that
[02:06] <asac> is the tag set?
[02:06] <asac> they usually don't release it, but tag it properly
[02:06] <Ubulette> dont know
[02:08] <Ubulette> I've readded --with-branding=browser/branding/unofficial
[02:10] <Ubulette> i'm wondering if 1 branch of ff3 is not enough at the moment
[02:13] <Ubulette> asac, ?
[02:26] <Ubulette> asac, damn. 3.0~a8 < 3.0~alpha7
[02:35] <gnomefreak> i would assume due to the a8 instead of aletters7
[02:37] <Ubulette> yep but no worry, I've fixed it
[02:38] <gnomefreak> i have 240 LP janitor bugs i have to go through each one and decide close or keep
[02:38] <gnomefreak> fucking thing is buggy as hell but being worked on
[02:40] <gnomefreak> well it marks dups too :(
[03:14] <asac> Ubulette: right i think the idea to have one branch for .dev from which we do ppa releases
[03:14] <asac> Ubulette: i think we should make the branding switch dependent on package version
[03:15] <asac> if there is cvs in it ... don't use it ... otherwise go for it ...
[03:15] <Ubulette> good idea
[03:15] <Ubulette> i have a problem with last commit
[03:18] <Ubulette> cannot get rid of firefox-granparadiso automatically
[03:18] <asac> why?
[03:19] <asac> how automatically?
[03:19] <Ubulette> i guess it's the alpha7 > a8
[03:19] <asac> yeah
[03:19] <Ubulette> The following packages have been kept back:
[03:19] <Ubulette>   firefox-3.0 firefox-3.0-dom-inspector firefox-3.0-gnome-support firefox-3.0-venkman firefox-trunk firefox-trunk-dom-inspector firefox-trunk-gnome-support firefox-trunk-venkman
[03:19] <Ubulette> apt-get install firefox-granparadiso
[03:19] <Ubulette> firefox-granparadiso is already the newest version.
[03:20] <asac> Ubulette: is it a problem to use alpha8 ?
[03:20] <Ubulette> where ?
[03:20] <Ubulette> everywhere ?
[03:21] <asac> everywhere (for ffox) until we are final ... yes.
[03:22] <asac> a second option would be to use upper case for ffox i guess
[03:22] <asac> e.g. ~A8
[03:22] <asac> if that is more suitable for mozclient et al
[03:49] <Ubulette> asac, still doesn't work
[04:10] <asac> Ubulette: take a look at thunderbird transitional packages
[04:10] <asac> its propably a technically issue ... you need a versioned conflicts et a.
[04:10] <Ubulette> it did work for -trunk but not for both -trunk and -gp
[04:11] <Ubulette> I had one
[04:11] <asac> ok the new package has for tbird:
[04:11] <Ubulette> lp is down once again
[04:11] <asac> Conflicts: mozilla-thunderbird-dev (<< 1.6~)
[04:11] <asac> Replaces: mozilla-thunderbird-dev
[04:11] <Ubulette> I did that
[04:11] <asac> while mozilla-thunderbird-dev is just a transitional package that depends on thunderbird
[04:12] <asac> Package: mozilla-thunderbird-dev
[04:12] <asac> Architecture: all
[04:12] <asac> Depends: thunderbird-dev
[04:12] <asac> Description: Transition package for mozilla-thunderbird rename
[04:14] <Ubulette> http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/38189/
[04:15] <asac> Ubulette: you have versioned replaces ... not conflicts
[04:15] <asac> try to flip that
[04:15] <Ubulette> previous commit, I versionned both
[04:16] <asac> and please don't versione the depends in transitional packages
[04:16] <asac> thats a pain for the archive
[04:17] <Ubulette> ?
[04:17] <Ubulette> why ?
[04:18] <asac> think ;)
[04:18] <asac> oh ... i see that your control file wouldn't be such a pain... but thats a bug on its own
[04:18] <asac> Architecture: all ... for transition packages
[04:18] <asac> is the idea
[04:19] <Ubulette> a bug ?
[04:19] <asac> in your control file ... yes.
[04:20] <Ubulette> arch any ?
[04:20] <asac> transitional packages should have arch all
[04:20] <asac> because there is nothing arch dependent in it
[04:20] <Ubulette> oops
[04:21] <Ubulette> any/all
[04:21] <asac> and then drop the versioned depends
[04:21] <asac> because otherwise slow archs will get build failures for packages that build-depend on it for some time
[04:22] <asac> e.g. all package is newer as soon as first arch finishes
[04:22] <Ubulette> oh, i see
[04:22] <asac> while there is no binary package available for days on m86k for example
[04:23] <asac> actually its a bug in the archive and i am not sure if ubuntu archive is smarter than debian archive
[04:23] <asac> but i doubt it
[04:24] <asac> Ubulette: so at best no all arch package has a strict versioned depends
[04:26] <Ubulette> pushed (lp back on)
[04:26] <asac> so it works now?
[04:27] <Ubulette> bot building..
[04:27] <asac> Ubulette: you definitly should flip the the replaces/conflicts versioned depends
[04:27] <Ubulette> done too
[04:27] <asac> ok
[04:27] <asac> what package version is it?
[04:27] <Ubulette> a8
[04:28] <Ubulette> should be ready
[04:28] <asac> full version ;)
[04:28] <asac> of package
[04:28] <Ubulette> yep
[04:28] <asac> i mean i asked for the package version ... not for a8
[04:28] <asac> ;)
[04:29] <Ubulette> firefox-3.0 (3.0~alpha8-0ubuntu1~mt1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
[04:29] <asac> ok
[04:30] <asac> Ubulette: can you please relax the dom-inspector depends (if you haven't done that already)
[04:30] <asac> its arch all afaik
[04:31] <asac> same for venkman
[04:31] <Ubulette> it is
[04:32] <asac> i look at rev 85
[04:32] <Ubulette> Package: firefox-3.0-dom-inspector
[04:32] <Ubulette> Architecture: all
[04:32] <Ubulette> rev85
[04:32] <asac> yes, but read what i asked for :)
[04:33] <asac> "relax the dom-inspector depends"
[04:33] <asac> Depends: firefox-3.0 (>= ${source:Version}), firefox-3.0 (<< ${source:Version}.1~)
[04:33] <asac> its too strict imo
[04:33] <asac> its almost as strict as binary depends
[04:34] <asac> or am i wrong?
[04:34] <asac> i think dom-inspector shouldn't need a strict depends at all
[04:34] <asac> just Depends: firefox-3.0
[04:35] <asac> same probably for venkman
[04:35] <Ubulette> done
[04:35] <asac> but i haven't tracked how venkman evolved in the past
[04:36] <Ubulette> didnt work
[04:36] <Ubulette> well, i'm exhausted
[04:36] <Ubulette> please, fix it
[04:36] <asac> Ubulette: thanks ... i can do that
[04:37] <asac> Ubulette: relax on weekend ;)
[04:37] <Ubulette> thx, you too
[04:37] <asac> ok 'night then
[04:38] <Ubulette> night