[01:14] and for a good build id its export BUILD_OFFICIAL=1 in the rules file [01:14] (if that doesn't work try export MOZILLA_OFFICIAL=1 ... or both, but i think its BUILD_OFFICIAL that forces use of a sane BUILD_ID [01:14] ) [01:18] how can I see the buildid ? [01:18] during build [01:18] i see atm: [01:18] c++ -o nsHTMLCanvasFrame.o -c -fvisibility=hidden -DMOZILLA_INTERNAL_API -D_IMPL_NS_COM -DEXPORT_XPT_API -DEXPORT_XPTC_API -DEXPORT_XPTI_API -D_IMPL_NS_COM_OBSOLETE -D_IMPL_NS_GFX -D_IMPL_NS_WIDGET -DIMPL_XULAPI -DIMPL_NS_NET -DOSTYPE=\"Linux2.6\" -DOSARCH=\"Linux\" -DBUILD_ID=0000000000 -D_.... [01:18] its certainly in some config file as well in the end [01:19] no such thing in 1.9 [01:19] but i usually just see it there ;)... and then don't care anymore [01:19] hmm [01:19] try to grep in config files [01:19] maybe definitions are now in headers [01:20] no /build_/i in build logs [01:20] grep -r -i build_id config/* mozilla-config* build/* [01:20] :) [01:20] grep -r -i build_id config/* mozilla-config* build/* configure.in [01:20] ;) [01:22] maybe but where is it used in 1.9 ? [01:23] $ /usr/lib/xulrunner/xulrunner -v [01:23] Mozilla XULRunner 1.8.1.4_0000000000 [01:23] $ xulrunner -v [01:23] Mozilla XULRunner 1.9a8pre - 2007082400 [01:23] no 000000000 [01:23] ok good [01:24] blind me :) [01:24] you posted that above ;) [01:24] yep [01:34] Ubulette: can you please conflict << 1.8.1.4-2ubuntu4 [01:34] ok [01:34] good ... then things look good [01:38] yes [01:38] i guess we don't have implemented the extensions solution already, right? [01:39] no [01:39] thats ok ... i think we can push this back to a9 b1 [01:39] a9/b1 [01:39] somehting is really fucking wrong with this. ill look at it more tomorrow [01:39] unless you see issues of course [01:39] bot xul and ff3 read from /usr/lib/xulrunner-addons now [01:39] both [01:39] ok [01:39] i think we can do that way [01:40] did you sort out the upgrade path issues? [01:40] e.g. directory exists when link should be created? [01:42] not sure. I've upgraded a 2nd machine without problem [01:42] those issues don't exist in gutsy anyway, right? [01:42] asac: would 99_configure.dpatch have an effect on our pres_ubuntu.dpatch? [01:42] there is firefox-granparadiso at them moment ... and not firefox-3.0 [01:42] no, only ppa and my bot [01:42] yeah === gnomefreak wonders if upstream didnt mess something up [01:43] it will? [01:43] ok i think i can test the upgrade anyway [01:43] xul rev33 pushed [01:43] thanks [01:43] asac, you're getting the diffs now, right ? [01:43] yeah ... a bit late, but i get them :) [01:48] ouch :) [01:48] my mailserver was down :/ [01:48] ? [01:48] i stopped it 6 hours ago apparenlty [01:48] is fetchmail smart enough? or did i loose zillions of mails now? [01:49] ok downloading 1300 messages or so ... good [01:49] hmm, mike installed /usr/bin/xulrunner-config with 1.8 [01:49] did he? [01:49] do we do that as well? [01:50] ix:~$ /usr/bin/xulrunner-config --version [01:50] 1.8.1.4 [01:50] no [01:50] ok, then we don't need an alt for that ;) [01:51] some configure scripts may be confused [01:51] well ... so be it ;) [01:51] afaik there is no debian package using it [01:52] it was broken and mike fixed it just because i wanted to use it [01:52] he said that nobody reported a bug before [01:55] http://ppa.launchpad.net/jani/ubuntu/pool/main/x/xulrunner-1.9/ :)) [01:55] who is jani? [01:57] https://launchpad.net/~jani/+archive [01:57] yes [01:57] saw that [01:58] oh, i know, that's for OLPC [01:58] that's janimo [01:59] Ubulette: you know how i can force exim to deliver everything tht it deferred? [01:59] no, i'm good with sendmail [02:00] yeah [02:00] i guessed that ;) [02:00] why ? [02:00] how ? [02:01] well ;) [02:03] i just think that you probably used sendmail once, and so you have an opinion ... while i hate all these kind of things so much, that I just use whatever comes by default [02:05] but atm there is a thousand mails or so stuck ... and i hate it ;) [02:15] why on earth does miro install wpasupplicant during build ???? [02:16] damn, it's in the bootstrap or toolchain [02:16] bad bad evil [02:17] what? [02:18] I see wpasupplicant installed in my bot logs [02:19] damn, it's in the bootstrap [02:19] yes, but certainly not by toolchain ;) [02:20] in debootstrap? [02:20] yep [02:20] wireless-tools wpasupplicant [02:20] in pbuilder as well? [02:21] i don't know [02:21] I'm not using pbuilder [02:21] do you have synched clock? [02:21] what time is it? [02:21] @time ;) [02:21] @time [02:22] Current time in Etc/UTC: September 27 2007, 00:21:59 - Next meeting: Desktop Team Development in 11 hours 38 minutes [02:22] @time berlin [02:22] Thu Sep 27 02:22:21 CEST 2007 [02:22] Current time in Europe/Berlin: September 27 2007, 02:22:26 - Next meeting: Desktop Team Development in 11 hours 37 minutes [02:22] looks like my mail server is out of sync [02:22] 3 minutes drift or something [02:23] you don't run ntp ? [02:23] yes i do [02:24] i restarted it (it was still running) [02:24] now all is fine again [02:24] must be a bug [02:24] i had haevy ppp issues later today (when i stopped my mailserver) [02:24] e.g. connection droppage for an hour [02:24] maybe that hit ntp too hard :) [02:28] ok i am off [02:28] night [02:29] night === gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [03:54] asac: in the morning before i head to dr or when i return for some damn weird ass reason the 82_prefs_ubuntu patch applies during build but the option that the patch gives doesnt show up once iceape is installed (this has been bothering me the past few days, a hint or 3 would be helpful but i need to handle some troll than im going to bed === tonyy [n=anthony@ubuntu/member/tonyyarusso] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [10:06] gnomefreak: no idea without looking [10:06] can be everything [10:57] asac: my branch has latest changes if you get a minute [11:01] gnomefreak: if that was introduced recently then you just have to figure out which change introduces this regression [11:02] when did it first break? [11:03] asac: from what i have gathered the patch we introduced in 1.1.3 or whatever version it was but for some odd reason update-mnaager fails on that packages (would like a clean install if apt-get can opull that off [11:04] it worked prior to running autoconf2.13 is where i last say it (but very wekk could have be berod that [11:04] sad part is patch gets applied to i fiure its still goood bbut failed to be used once built nad installed [11:06] so which file does it patch? ... and where is that installed? === gnomefreak sad part i i am gonna be confused for a little while as i didnt sleep wprth a crap and asking mvo about envy/disrupdare [11:11] k [11:33] well wen i return from dr.s i would to fix this(i have thinkty ill be back sso as im prettmuch typing without brain activity :(ing 99_confireation [11:33] .win 10 [11:36] !daily [11:36] Daily builds of the CD images of the current development version of Ubuntu are available at http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily/current/ and http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/ === bluekuja [n=andrea@ubuntu/member/bluekuja] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === bluekuja [n=andrea@ubuntu/member/bluekuja] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === AlinuxOS [n=vsichi@87.16.133.72] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [03:14] asac: it patches /modules/libpref/src/init/all.js to add go button to toolbar [03:16] hi [03:16] gnomefreak: yeah ... but if itnever works why should probably just drop that feature ;) [03:16] hi Ubulette [03:18] asac: it did work up until (atleast where i relized) was when we patched for gcc and freinds [03:18] Ubulette: archive will open tomorrow according to /topic in -devel [03:18] but it did work great at one time, and i see no reason why its failing to work now, all we did is add a patch and run autoconf [03:19] gnomefreak: feel free to fix it ... the patch patches a file that is completely unreleated to it ... so it must be something else [03:19] asac: huh? [03:19] it patches the file that th prefs are in [03:19] gnomefreak: the gcc patch has definitly nothing to do with it [03:19] asac: i know that [03:19] unless you dropped the other patch from 00list [03:19] no [03:19] (accidentially) [03:20] gnomefreak: yes ... have you verified that the right config entry exists in the installed file? [03:20] but i did notice in 00list the 82_prefs_ubuntu patch has .dpatch on end and is under the 99_configure but moving it and removing .dpatch from it didnt fix it either [03:21] gnomefreak: don't do trial and error ... figure out why its not working in installed deb [03:21] is the pref set there? [03:21] when i build source i looked into the file th patch patches and it is there [03:21] if not its probably not patched in source [03:21] gnomefreak: look in the build result ... not in the source [03:21] (well looking in source is good to check that the patch applied) [03:21] asac: i looked in build-area/ubuntu.../ modules/ect... [03:22] yes look in the installed files [03:22] installed file you mean after build when i install it? [03:23] gnomefreak: in debian/iceape/... [03:23] or in the real install location [03:23] yes [03:25] ok giv me a few to build source again, i cleaned it up last night since everything i was thinking it could be was wrong [03:25] fucking annoying bastard [03:25] brb [03:26] gnomefreak: look at the installed files then [03:26] (in the meantime) [03:29] bug 144882 asac please fucking comment on this bug before this so of a bitch pisses me off pinging me ever 30 minutes [03:29] Launchpad bug 144882 in network-manager "ioctl[SIOCSIWAUTH] : Operation not supported" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/144882 [03:30] and when you sa installed files you mean in ~/.mozilla/defualt /etc/iceape...? since the debina/* has nothing since its not built yet no temp yet [03:32] im about 30 seconds from banning the fucker now [03:33] there i think im done with him [03:34] asac: btw hes got 2gigs memory [03:34] and a sore IRC nick if he pms me again [03:34] yeah [03:35] gnomefreak: the all.js should be installed somewhere [03:35] k smole first search next [03:36] gnomefreak: why does he ping you? [03:36] gnomefreak: i mean you never commented on that bug ... so how did you pull him to you? [03:36] i told him to file the bug report :( [03:36] price i pay for being an op i guess [03:37] gnomefreak: he sent me a private mail ... which i just deleted [03:37] no idea what he told me [03:37] asac, ;) hello & hello all! Congratulations for Beta! [03:39] hi ... i assume you are not yet happy? [03:39] which locale did i miss? [03:43] asac: /usr/share/iceape/greprefs/all.js has it in there [03:43] there was one other iceape all.js ill look at now [03:44] nope never mind that is xpinstall.js [03:45] so we know patch applies and the correct all.js gets installed (what am i not seeing) [03:55] gnomefreak: no idea [03:55] i guess the all.js is not used then? [03:56] maybe there is still something left in /etc/iceape ? [04:02] not really [04:02] asac: there is a /etc/iceape/iceaperc and an /etc/iceape/base.js [04:02] gnomefreak: ok merged the [SIOCSIWAUTH bug into the signal 5 bug cloud :) [04:02] neither have anything of importances [04:02] hope he is happy now [04:02] bug 144882 [04:02] Launchpad bug 144882 in network-manager "crashes with signal 5 because it cannot acquire dbus connection (dup-of: 85113)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/144882 [04:02] Launchpad bug 85113 in network-manager "[apport] NetworkManager crashed with signal 5 in main()" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/85113 [04:03] ah ok [04:03] good happy means he might leave me alone [04:03] well ... tell him that PM some dev brings him in spam folder [04:03] oh it was /etc/iceape/pref/basejs and /etc/iceape/iceaperc [04:03] maybe he understands then that i never answer to such mails [04:03] asac: good idea [04:03] (unless they reveal a fix of course) [04:04] gnomefreak: so /etc/iceape/pref/basejs contains a setting that conflicts with what ou changed in all.js ? [04:05] pref("intl.locale.matchOS", true); [04:05] not unless that does and im thinking not likely [04:05] no its ok [04:05] base.js looks only to be locale relates [04:05] d [04:06] ICEAPE_DSP="none" not likely either [04:06] that was in iceaperc [04:06] gnomefreak: look at about:config [04:06] maybe the setting is ok? [04:06] which preference did you tweak btw? [04:07] for the profile im loading not a one [04:08] i asked for the pref name you changed :) [04:08] its set to false in about:config [04:09] asac: with the patch? [04:09] its browser.toolbars.showbutton.go [04:09] yes [04:09] search all prefs for a setting like that [04:09] is the setting marked as default ... or modified? [04:09] in about:config [04:09] (normal or bold) [04:10] default [04:10] normal [04:10] default boolean false is everything after the prefs in about:config [04:11] the showbutton.home .print .search are all true [04:11] yeah ... then you did something wrong [04:11] you probably patched the wrong source file [04:11] searcn for all .js files that have that key [04:12] there should be two or your patch is applied to wrong file [04:12] archive.u.c is damn slow [04:14] asac: in top level dir of build-area is there a way to search all files/dir? [04:15] im using search .js | grep prefs changed [04:15] and its not bringing anything up [04:20] damn [04:20] remember: [04:20] find -name \*.js | xargs grep prefname [04:21] gnomefreak: but actually don't do it in build-area, first try to search that way in debian/iceape/ [04:21] (after build) [04:21] never clean builds you have done until you do a new build (so you can easily track down things) [04:22] hmmmmmmmmm might have issue here [04:22] i didnt clean after build and i use --dont-purge but i dont see a debian/tmp [04:23] gnomefreak: look for debian/iceape [04:23] if not you _did_ clean [04:23] not htere [04:23] no mater what you think you did [04:23] an no i didnt clean unless it did after building source [04:23] gnomefreak@Gutsy:~/gutsy-builds/work/ubuntu-1.1.x$ bzr bd --merge --dont-purge --builder='dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -S -sa -k3C1C3C2A' [04:23] i know i didnt clean [04:23] that cleans [04:24] that doesn't build either [04:24] it just builds the sources ... for which you have to clean [04:24] its builds sources [04:24] yes ... thats not a build [04:24] thats just clean + diff [04:24] --dont-purge == dont clean [04:24] oh so i have to build bins [04:24] grrrrrr [04:24] gnomefreak: you don't understand ... building sources isn't building [04:24] right [04:25] its building just not building binaries i thought [04:25] gnomefreak: you have to build ... building sources might use the same word, but isn't building at all [04:26] ubotu: [04:26] Ubulette: [04:26] Uploading to ubuntu (via ftp to upload.ubuntu.com): xulrunner_1.8.1.4-2ubuntu4.dsc: done. xulrunner_1.8.1.4-2ubuntu4.diff.gz: done. xulrunner_1.8.1.4-2ubuntu4_source.changes: done. [04:26] ok bbs its gonna be a bit and it freezes me up something awful but ill be back [04:26] Successfully uploaded packages. [04:26] Not running dinstall. [04:26] sure [04:26] take the build time to rest, drink ... whatever [04:27] im going to lay down i slept like shit so i figure i got time for the build [04:27] gnomefreak: btw, i answered the guys Private mail ... telling him that private mails cannot be considered for bugs ;) [04:27] and deleted ;) [04:27] i didnt see a private mail but i havent looked either [04:28] he kept asking how to get in touch with you and i told him you would comment on the bug no need to talk to him outside of bug [04:28] hes beena royal pain im ny ass (it makes me think twice about saying anything in #ubuntu+1 [04:30] gnomefreak: just ignore pms [04:30] unless you know that they are sensible (e.g from other public channels) [04:31] gnomefreak: he sent private mail to the email he found in bug [04:35] maybe since i didnt tell him how to get intouch with you he tried that. i told him today 4 times to ask me in 4-5 hours im busy as hell and not feeling well [04:35] but he went around my back anyway :( [04:36] i cant sleep i have meeting in about 25 minutes [04:36] !daily [04:36] Daily builds of the CD images of the current development version of Ubuntu are available at http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily/current/ and http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/ [04:43] gnomefreak: yeah ... some people think that yelling helps [04:43] well they will learn :) [04:43] testing beta cd? [04:48] me? [04:48] no [04:48] Ubulette: xulrunner accepted [04:49] is 1.9 ready for a punch? [04:49] 1.8 ? [04:49] yes [04:49] was punched through by RMs apparently, because archive is still not open completely [04:49] hold on. I've packaged a xulapp and I'm testing it with xul 1.9 [04:50] Ubulette: how about testing with firefox ;) ? ... the killer-xul-app [04:50] for me, ff3 is okay [04:50] k [04:51] Ubulette: which xulapp are you testing? [04:51] webrunner === asac being curious [04:51] whats that? [04:51] i tiny browser? [04:51] s/i/a/ [04:51] http://wiki.mozilla.org/WebRunner [04:52] ah ok [04:52] http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/09/web-applications-mozilla-style/ [04:52] it's really tiny [04:52] maybe we should come up with a launchpad specific webrunner ;) [04:52] yes [04:53] sounds interesting [04:53] http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/38811/ [04:54] feel free to create the project on lp :) [04:55] i really have itchy fingers to upload xulrunner-1.9 to debian ;) [04:55] why ? [04:55] unstable or experimental ? [04:55] well, debian deserves a decent xulrunner package :) [04:55] unstable of course :) [04:56] will mike kill you ? [04:56] yeah [04:56] but would be interesting to see what happens if i upload firefox-3.0 + xulrunner-1.9 [04:56] me too [04:57] i think i would need a strawman for that :) === hjmf [n=hjmf@115.Red-83-49-18.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [04:58] lets get some experience first ... if upgrading works fine (for moz embedders), I will open an ITP [04:58] thats less aggressive, but should have nearly the same impact (aka flamewar on -devel) [05:00] Ubulette: now that we use full versioned dirs there won't even be a problem to have both in the archive [05:00] when I don't use cdbs, do I have to do all the dh_* -kfoo myself ? [05:00] -k? [05:00] -p? [05:01] right [05:01] Ubulette: just running dh_install is equivalent to for all packages; do dh_install -p [05:01] i have *.install files and they are ignored [05:01] just run dh_install without -p [05:02] and be sure that the package names match the one in control [05:02] but as soon as you need to do special things it stops to work [05:02] why not using cdbs? [05:02] i see that its not as flexible as plain debhelper, but usually you can do what you want [05:03] (i have no real opinion about it, which is why i want to hear more arguments:)) [05:03] there's nothing to build and no build system, I just need to install the files at the right place [05:05] ok ... i think just including debhelper.mk is the same [05:05] its just one line in rules then [05:05] + .install files [05:05] i saw packages like that already. .. let me think [05:05] but well ... it probably doesn't matter much :) [05:06] just implement clean and binary-arch binary-indep binary [05:08] I want to install each webapp in a different deb, does that sound right to you ? [05:08] definitly ... is there a -common package as well? [05:08] a web app is just a small .webapp file (a zip) [05:08] (take all this with a grain of sand ... i haven't looked in detail) [05:09] Ubulette: so its like an extension package? [05:09] does it have install.rdf? [05:09] or what is in there? [05:09] I think I only want webrunner and a bunch of webapp-{googlereader,gmail,....} depending on webrunner [05:10] $ ls install/profiles/ [05:10] facebook.webapp ganalytics.webapp gcalendar.webapp gdocs.webapp gmail.webapp greader.webapp groups.webapp gtalk.webapp twitter.webapp [05:10] Archive: install/profiles/gmail.webapp [05:10] Length Method Size Ratio Date Time CRC-32 Name [05:10] -------- ------ ------- ----- ---- ---- ------ ---- [05:10] 143 Defl:N 112 22% 09-08-07 15:46 becc978f webapp.ini [05:10] 1019 Defl:N 477 53% 08-31-07 23:40 48c2c9c3 webapp.js [05:10] 1150 Defl:N 163 86% 03-06-07 15:13 0915e154 gmail.ico [05:10] 491 Defl:N 214 56% 07-13-07 08:19 22b21df6 gmail.xpm [05:11] 39891 Defl:X 7188 82% 07-29-07 22:36 ae2b5ccf gmail.icns [05:11] -------- ------- --- ------- [05:11] 42694 8154 81% 5 files === asac_ [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [05:24] asac_ ? [05:26] this is not good, maybe ill have to miss meeting (laywer didnt get my paperwork for court and it says it was deliered) might have to work this out damnit [05:27] Ubulette: maybe i missed a few lines [05:28] but please call the packages webrunner-APPNAME [05:28] not webapp-XX [05:28] sure [05:29] how do I register a mime type ? ie click on a .webapp in nautilus or ff lauch webrunner ? [05:39] asac, on 1st run, I get a python error from xul: http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/38814/ [05:41] (not fatal) [05:41] how is time.so linked? [05:41] (ldd) [05:42] looks like its not linked against any python lib ... which probably causes this [05:42] but then ... python should already be resident in process [05:42] so ... no idea [05:43] does webrunner use pytho at all? [05:43] dont know [05:43] or is it just because our python package is broken? [05:43] (e.g. broken pyxpcom component) [05:44] http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/38816/ [05:44] what happened to firefox lp page? [05:44] https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox [05:45] (broken) [05:45] https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xulrunner [05:45]