[01:07] <bigon> hi
[01:08] <bigon> are buildd admin aware that ppa buildd failed because of Could not connect to archive.ubuntu.com:80 (91.189.89.8). - connect (113 No route to host) [IP: 91.189.89.8 80] 
[01:08] <bigon> ?
[01:08] <Daviey> elmo: are you a LP admin?
[01:51] <reacocard> is PPA out of beta yet?
[01:59] <mtaylor> one of my bzr branches on launchpad seems to be a bit borked - is there anybody around who can help? 
[02:16] <Stickscoder> /quiy
[04:18] <gnomefreak> is loggerhead private or was it packaged for ubuntu repos?
[04:21] <ajmitch> there's a link to the source, no?
[04:22] <gnomefreak> ajmitch: yep but is there a reason why it wasnt packaged for gutsy?
[04:23] <ajmitch> because noone did it?
[04:23] <gnomefreak> is it planned to be released to repos ever?
[04:23] <ajmitch> maybe if someone chooses to package it, just like any piece of software
[04:23] <gnomefreak> since it was branched i assumed that he would have packaged it
[04:23] <ajmitch> who's 'he'?
[04:24] <gnomefreak> that should be easy enough
[04:24] <gnomefreak> tom haden or Michael hudson
[04:24] <ajmitch> easy if you've done packaging
[04:24] <gnomefreak> hadden
[04:25] <gnomefreak> yeah i have
[04:25] <ajmitch> then do it! :)
[04:25] <gnomefreak> just wondered if there was a reason thats all
[04:25] <gnomefreak> ajmitch: i might for hardy since gutsy is closed for most part
[04:25] <ajmitch> because there's no formal release recently?
[04:25] <ajmitch> at least not that I've seen
[04:26] <gnomefreak> The current version is 1.1.1-0.13 (meaning 1.1.1, requiring bazaar 0.13), released on 24 Jan 2006 at revision 109.
[04:26] <gnomefreak> could be a good reason
[04:27] <ajmitch> most people don't care about packaging something if the code is still under development 
[04:28] <gnomefreak> jan 20 2007 was latest in the news section atleast
[04:37] <pwnguin> https://edge.launchpad.net/+builds/yellow/+history
[04:39] <pwnguin> does failed to build different than depwait?
[04:42] <pwnguin> yarg. IS ftb handled differently than depwait =/
[04:42] <pwnguin> seems like all the debhelper packages are failing to install debhelper
[05:28] <minghua> Hello, is there any words about mass build failures on all buildds of different arches?
[06:30] <mpt> Gooooooooooooooooooooood afternoon Launchpadders!
[08:41] <mpt> kiko, that's an excellent idea of Caroline Ford's
[08:41] <mpt> to have translations of "If you want an Ubuntu CD, ...", in popular languages, on the mailing list page
[09:15] <thumper> Daviey: pong but afk
[09:16] <thumper> Daviey: leave a priv msg if you want an answer tonight
[09:17] <Daviey> thumper: woo
[10:58] <TomaszD> there's been some updates to displayconfig-gtk lately with some translation template updates, but these changes haven't been imported to Rosetta. I just want to make sure if there is in a pending template import for Rosetta. Can anyone check that please?
[10:59] <TomaszD> I know it's Saturday, I'm gonna go partying just like you peeps, but seriously, I need to know :] 
[11:02] <mpt> TomaszD, the answer is somewhere in <https://translations.edge.launchpad.net/+imports>
[11:02] <mpt> Unfortunately that list is 101569 items long and not searchable
[11:03] <mpt> carlos, danilos, and jtv are the people who can help you more
[11:05] <TomaszD> mpt, thanks for the link, I just noticed I can't search through this, the filters are helpful but not much
[11:07] <mpt> Yeah, I was just thinking that -- target is Gutsy, filetype is .pot, but even then ...
[11:07] <mpt> 1   50  of 289 results
[11:08] <mpt> hmm, that's only six pages
[11:08] <TomaszD> I did and I manually searched (ctrl+f -> display) for it in needs review and approved
[11:08] <TomaszD> but it's not there
[11:09] <mpt> This problem is reported as bug 119602
[11:09] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 119602 in rosetta "Poor feedback after project enters translation import queue" [High,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/119602 - Assigned to Carlos Perell Marn (carlos)
[11:09] <TomaszD> I probably won't find pitti during the weekend so
[11:10] <TomaszD> ah, subscribed to that bug
[11:21] <danilos> TomaszD, mpt: if it's about Ubuntu package, it's also up on https://translations.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+source/displayconfig-gtk/+imports
[11:22] <TomaszD> danilos, that's the first place I checked. Hmm, I've opened a bug about this omission.
[11:22] <danilos> TomaszD: it says there that it was imported 17h ago
[11:23] <TomaszD> danilos, what was imported? No .pot files there 
[11:23] <TomaszD> ahh, this thing
[11:24] <TomaszD> so theoretically this was a no-change upload, which contradicts the changelog
[11:24] <TomaszD> will see
[11:25] <danilos> TomaszD: was whatever was needed added to POTFILES.in and similar (if using intltool)
[11:25] <ubotu> New bug: #146659 in restricted-manager "[Gutsy]  restricted manager isn't translated into Spanish, there's NOT a .mo file" [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/146659
[11:27] <TomaszD> danilos, the changelog says    * Extract translatable strings from xfailsafedialog
[11:28] <danilos> TomaszD: and, a new package needs to be uploaded (that's when we pick new templates up)
[11:28] <TomaszD> so I assumed that the template needed an updated
[11:28] <TomaszD> *needed an update
[11:30] <danilos> TomaszD: the package seems not to have been built yet (that's when we get the POTs)
[11:30] <mpt> danilos, thanks, I didn't know such pages existed
[11:30] <danilos> TomaszD: look at https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+source/displayconfig-gtk/0.3.1 where it says "Builds of: gutsy i386 - Needs building"
[11:31] <TomaszD> danilos, so the gutsy-changes list is not a good indicator then :]  thanks for letting me know
[11:31] <danilos> TomaszD: to be honest, I don't actually know for sure: soyuz gives us a callback, and that's when we do the upload, and I've never played with that bits of code :)
[11:32] <TomaszD> :] 
[11:32] <danilos> mpt: it's a recent addition (1.1.8 I believe), it's accessible through "See import queue" links on translation pages
[11:33] <TomaszD> I guess you learn something new everyday, sometimes lp is still a mystery to me, but I'm getting the hang of its infrastructure slowly
[12:48] <Hobbsee> who broke bugs-auto-closing-changleogs?
[01:05] <Hobbsee> oh, hmm, it's sometimes working.
[02:00] <ubotu> New bug: #146712 in rosetta "Filter options: accelerators (hotkeys)" [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/146712
[02:36] <ubotu> New bug: #146731 in gnome-screensaver "[Gutsy]  Translation problems with the unlock screen" [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/146731
[03:18] <Kopfgeldjaeger> is a launchpad beta testers admin here?
[03:19] <Hobbsee> mrevell is not.
[03:20] <Kopfgeldjaeger> hum? what do you mean? 
[03:21] <Kopfgeldjaeger> aah... mrevell=admin, and mrevel is not here ;)
[03:22] <Hobbsee> yes
[04:42] <gnomefreak> if amd64 failed to build on PPA due to what looks like a soyaz/chroot issue do i still need to bump version and push again?
[04:43] <Hobbsee> er, ask cprov
[04:43] <gnomefreak> ty
[04:43] <gnomefreak> once he comes around if he does since its weekend
[04:45] <bigon> gnomefreak: there is a retry build link on the build log page
[04:45] <gnomefreak> ah ty
[04:47] <Hobbsee> gnomefreak: socket timeout, by any chance?
[04:49] <gnomefreak> no failed to pull in depends for cdbs and debhelper and friends
[04:49] <Hobbsee> gnomefreak: which package?
[04:49] <Hobbsee> smplayer?  clipper?
[04:49] <gnomefreak> https://edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/+build/400343
[04:50] <gnomefreak> xulrunner 1.9
[04:50] <Hobbsee> oh, they both hate life
[04:51] <Hobbsee> gnomefreak: how did you know it ftbfs, out of interest?
[04:52] <gnomefreak> go to PPA and look at failed builds :)
[04:52] <Hobbsee> gnomefreak: where, though?
[04:53] <Hobbsee> oh, i see.
[04:53] <gnomefreak> Hobbsee: when i upload i check (or someone else does)
[04:53] <Hobbsee> er, wait.
[04:53] <gnomefreak> https://edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/+builds?build_text=&build_state=building
[04:53] <Hobbsee> oh, it's there, right.
[04:53] <gnomefreak> change current to failed to build :)
[04:53] <Hobbsee> gnomefreak: that may fail again
[04:53] <gnomefreak> dont say that :(
[04:54] <gnomefreak> Hobbsee: its nothing with control file since that wasnt changed from mt3-mt4
[04:54] <Hobbsee> gnomefreak: that i386 version probably wont build till monday
[04:54] <gnomefreak> i had issues with grabbing depends (different errors same issue) easly fixedd though
[04:54] <Hobbsee> ie, until infinity or elmo or someone fixes it.
[04:54] <gnomefreak> is i386 down?
[04:54] <gnomefreak> ah
[04:55] <Hobbsee> gnomefreak: try to requeue it, but i dont think it'll take any extra builds
[04:55] <gnomefreak> cant remove it
[04:55] <Hobbsee> gnomefreak: https://edge.launchpad.net/+builds/samarium
[04:55] <gnomefreak> they havent given us that right yet
[04:55] <Hobbsee> NOT OK : Builder presenting continuously 'socket timeout' when downloading gutsy chroot. (AUTO)
[04:55] <Hobbsee> yeah
[04:56] <gnomefreak> oh crap
[04:56] <Hobbsee> amd64 should work OK.
[04:57] <Hobbsee> gnomefreak: this thing failed around ~15 hours ago?
[04:57] <gnomefreak> yes
[04:57] <gnomefreak> give or take
[04:57] <Hobbsee> good.
[04:57] <gnomefreak> but it never started i386
[04:57] <gnomefreak> only 64
[04:57] <Hobbsee> gnomefreak: because i386 had already decided it hated life before it got to your package.
[04:58] <Hobbsee> whereas amd64 kept bailing, so stopped building for a while, then built some things sucessfully
[04:58] <gnomefreak> thank god ::)
[04:58] <Hobbsee> hehe :)
[04:58] <Hobbsee> gnomefreak: you're lucky you arent using sejong or something.
[04:58] <gnomefreak> why it broken too?
[04:59] <Hobbsee> no, it appears to be workign at the moment.  it tends to hate life, and infinity, a lot more than the other buildds do, for some reason.
[04:59] <Hobbsee> clearly you havent heard him cursing about it :P
[04:59] <Hobbsee> https://edge.launchpad.net/+builds for reference
[04:59] <gnomefreak> nope not yet
[06:11] <funman> hi
[06:15] <funman> i can't add my ssh key & gpg key to my profile
[06:15] <funman> because they are already been added to an old profile i don't use anymore
[06:15] <funman> the associated email address doesn't exist anymore
[06:15] <funman> i had asked a while ago for a profile deletion, and did not care about it until recently, when i needed to use launchpad again
[06:16] <funman> i would like to have the old profile deleted
[06:17] <funman> the old profile is https://launchpad.net/~wavael , maybe you want me to sign something using the associated gpg key to prove it's me
[06:20] <pochu> funman: why not merging it with your new account?
[06:20] <pochu> https://launchpad.net/people/+requestmerge
[06:20] <ubotu> New bug: #146855 in rosetta "Delete entries in Fail status after a month in the queue" [Medium,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/146855
[06:20] <funman> i didn't know about that, i'll look
[06:21] <funman> You must have access to the e-mail address registered under the duplicated account.
[06:21] <funman> the e-mail address doesn't exist anymore
[06:22] <funman> should I use the http form request, or is it faster to ask for it here ?
[06:23] <pochu> funman: I'd ask via lp. Since it's Saturday and lp admins may be away...
[06:23] <pochu> answers.launchpad.net/launchpad <- write your request there :)
[06:23] <mpt> funman, if you don't have access to the e-mail address any more, the https://launchpad.net/people/+requestmerge form won't help
[06:23] <mpt> Use the address pochu gavew
[06:23] <mpt> gave
[06:23] <mpt> Though, that gives me an idea
[06:23] <funman> Note: If you no longer have access to the duplicated account's email address, you may place a support request or contact the Launchpad users mailing list; Launchpad administrators will tend to your request.
[06:23] <funman> i meant that one, 'support request'
[06:23] <mpt> yes, use that one
[06:24] <mpt> ... If the account you want has your GPG key
[06:24] <funman> 'you want' mean the old one ?
[06:24] <mpt> We should make it possible for you to claim that account by signing something with that GPG key
[06:24] <funman> ok
[06:24] <mpt> or something like that
[06:24] <pochu> That makes sense
[06:24] <mpt> That's not possible now, but it should be :-)
[06:34] <funman> https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/14227 < that should do the trick
[06:41] <ubotu> New bug: #146861 in launchpad "Allow claiming an account by signing/decrypting with the same OpenPGP key" [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/146861
[08:10] <RainCT> hi
[08:11] <RainCT> just for the case you don't know, the staging server isn't working ([...]  Sorry, there was a problem connecting to the Launchpad server. [...] )
[08:17] <gnomefreak> antone know when the buildds will be fixed (assuming monday since it is weekend)
[08:58] <Daviey> Hey, any LP admins about?
[11:07] <mtaylor> I need to get a borked bzr tree fixed on launchpad - should I just bug you guys in here, or do I need to file a support request on launchpad? 
[12:20] <bebers> http://tubeimage.com/viewer.php?file=cpr097wo8xau0587v6z6.jpg