[12:20] oh bummer, archive frozen [12:20] yeah just saw that [12:20] work through slangasek [12:21] and I was looking for more bugs to close with this [12:21] duh [12:21] I will [12:24] bryce: "freeze" only means "release team reviews and judges"; if they're high priority updates, upload them :) [12:24] tepsipakki: so I got a pre-okay for you for the -ati upload :-) [12:25] woohoo \o/ === ubotu [n=ubotu@ubuntu/bot/ubotu] has joined #ubuntu-x [12:28] ok, I got a nice inter-dep chain of the patches: 02 -> 03 -> 07 -> 09 [12:29] and 05 -> 09 [12:30] so now they are all covered; they either fix bugs or are required for a later patch :) [12:30] tepsipakki, I was thinking making an upstream patch for that rs482/5 thing [12:31] tormod: cool [12:31] pre-okay \o/ [12:36] ok, final check for the diff: http://users.tkk.fi/~tjaalton/dpkg/ati/ati.debdiff [12:36] patch 10 should be under [tormod volden] though :P [12:38] (LP: 132716) -> (LP: #132716) [12:38] heh all those prerequisites, you could make a graphical map to explain this :) [12:38] heh no kidding [12:38] bryce: damn, will fix [12:39] I sort of wonder if listing them in reverse would be better so the fixes are at the top. ;-) but I think it should be fine like this; at least it will be clear that the patches are necessary and not just extras along for the ride [12:39] also pre-req -> prereq [12:40] bryce: right, I'll just make more errors if I start shuffling them around :) [12:40] patch 04 doesn't list as a prereq nor as a bug fix [12:41] true, I'll add an explanation [12:41] otherwise, changelog looks good [12:42] should I review the patches themselves? I assume they're all tested and good. [12:42] well, they are upstream, so.. :) [12:43] heh, we all trust alex [12:43] blindly [12:44] not! [12:44] we have no choice :) [12:44] :-) [12:45] New bug: #149639 in xorg (main) "Xorg crashes very frequently" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/149639 [12:45] seriously, they have been tested on quite a number of cards. [12:53] ok, diff updated, now chat with RM -> [12:56] I made that upstream patch, but now n [12:56] now bugs.fd.o is failing... [12:57] typical [12:58] alex is back in #xorg-devel [01:02] yes, and ati uploaded [01:02] tormod: will you poke him? [01:03] bryce: I milestoned all the bugs that this upload should fix [01:03] five of them [01:04] great [01:09] tepsipakki: I poked alex [01:09] tormod: yep, thanks [01:26] New bug: #44792 in xserver-xorg-video-ati (main) "Fixed resolution usign ati driver with Radeon 7500SE" [Medium,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/44792 [01:40] hmm, ati bug count soon below 100 (105 now) [01:40] yay! [01:42] hmm, I see 125 [01:43] uh, so do I now [01:43] maybe it's b.e.lp.net playing tricks [01:44] sort by recently changed [01:45] actually, it doesn't matter what sort method to use, they all list 20 less [01:45] huh, weird [01:45] yeah.. well, it'll get below 120 anyway :) [01:46] :-) [01:49] anyway, bedtime. good night! [01:50] New bug: #149653 in xorg (main) "Xorg crash with xrandr1.2 and dual screens with compiz" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/149653 [01:55] night [01:56] tepsipakki: if you're not yet asleep, I have a quetion on bug 126425 [01:56] Launchpad bug 126425 in xorg-server "Intel driver (using EXA) crashes system when starting compiz" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/126425 [01:56] they propose dropping patch 120 from xserver; I was wondering why we are carrying it. [02:03] tepsipakki: I just reported that sorting issue to launchpad this morning [02:03] good night I guess :) [02:05] I am off to bed as well. Cool that we got that far with the ati driver tonight! [02:16] 6.7.194-1ubuntu2 got through! that was fast [02:20] good night === tormod [n=tormod@80-219-112-71.dclient.hispeed.ch] has left #ubuntu-x ["Ex-Chat"] [02:23] awesome, good work you two! [02:41] and just now of course alex released 6.7.195 ;-) [02:51] New bug: #40249 in xserver-xorg-input-synaptics (main) "Laptop test: touchpad scroll on Dell Inspiron 600m doesn't work" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/40249 [02:56] New bug: #149662 in xorg (main) "Upgrade to Kubuntu 7.10 beta in Spanish fails to get some .deb's" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/149662 [04:41] New bug: #149684 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.22 (restricted) "linux-restricted-modules-2.6.22-13-generic is not available and makes boot finish on failsafe x interface" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/149684 [06:50] New bug: #149700 in xserver-xorg-driver-vmware (main) "Resolution greater than screen resolution used by vmware driver by default" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/149700 === bryce [n=bryce@c-67-169-207-142.hsd1.or.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-x [09:02] aw dammit, ati failed to build because of a typo in patch 10 I guess.. but we could just as well sync with debian which has .195. delta is small :) [09:10] yup [09:20] New bug: #149726 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.22 (restricted) "[Gutsy] xorg-driver-fglrx: multihead breaks catastrophicly" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/149726 [09:24] tepsipakki: ok that's permission to upload :-) [09:45] New bug: #149732 in xorg (main) "After last update,Xorg can't want to start" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/149732 === mvo [n=egon@p54A64932.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-x [10:05] heya mvo === tormod [n=tormod@80-219-112-71.dclient.hispeed.ch] has joined #ubuntu-x [10:11] ati 6.7.195-1 is out in Debian... [10:12] maybe we should just sync to that? [10:13] tormod, we have permission from RM to upload 195 [10:13] excellent! [10:13] tormod: and unfortunately our -ati upload FTBFS [10:15] oops that bad. it was just happily building when I went to bed. [10:15] did tepsipakki build it himself first? [10:15] not sure, maybe not [10:16] aw dammit, ati failed to build because of a typo in patch 10 I guess.. but we could just as well sync with debian which has .195. delta is small :) [10:17] yes that's better. the delta is real small, basically Michel's exa commits. [10:18] :-) [10:19] I was thinking about building test packages of .195, but maybe that's not needed if you just upload it. [10:20] probably not [10:24] hey bryce [10:25] mvo, how goes? long time no see :-) [10:26] bryce: good, thanks! the usual almost-at-release madness [10:26] yup [10:27] I'm proud of where we're at with gutsy but also know we can do a lot better for hardy [10:27] mvo, fwiw I reinstalled onto an ati laptop recently and was impressed to see compiz come up and "just work" [10:28] bryce: woah, that is cool. it at a good level currently, I'm quite happy with the status [10:28] you've done a great job at getting compiz ready to go, I'm quite impressed. [10:29] I think gutsy is going to be an upgrade people notice. :-) [10:31] thanks! === seb128 [n=seb128@ubuntu/member/seb128] has joined #ubuntu-x [11:08] bryce, I found a (yet another) bug in xresprobe, and I have a debdiff in bug #148231. It could be that it fixes a lot issues, [11:08] Launchpad bug 148231 in xresprobe "[gutsy] bad modes in xorg.conf" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/148231 [11:09] please take a look and tell me if you want me to fix all the non-vesa cases as well. [11:15] tormod: ouch, that vesa change was mine.. [11:16] yep, b0rked sed-line [11:16] tepsipakki: sorry about that ati 10_ patch, I guess I should have tested better, like you ;) [11:17] tepsipakki: almost all the other driver cases have the same "non-robustness" [11:18] no problem, most important that there now is a new release, and jcristau was as fast as always uploading it to experimental :) [11:18] ;) [11:19] merge done, quick check of the debdiff and then upload [11:20] done [11:20] great [11:22] bryce: I'll check patch 120 now [11:29] ah, that's for making composite faster with current drivers [11:30] without that it would crawl [11:31] but we should evaluate it again when hardy opens, and perhaps enable EXA on some hardware (which would obsolete that hack) [11:52] I added xresprobe improvements for other drivers. Does anyone have a xorg.conf collection for regression testing? [11:57] actually it would be much better to fix the drivers to report this in a consistent way... [12:00] New bug: #149661 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.22 (restricted) "[Gutsy] Update fails to install "linux-restricted-modules-generic"" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/149661 === tormod [n=tormod@80-219-112-71.dclient.hispeed.ch] has joined #ubuntu-x [12:40] New bug: #149782 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.22 (restricted) "linux-restricted-modules missing for 2.6.22-13" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/149782 === seb128 [n=seb128@ubuntu/member/seb128] has joined #ubuntu-x [02:45] New bug: #130696 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.22 (restricted) "xine and totem-xine crashes with the fglrx driver" [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/130696 [03:31] New bug: #57345 in xorg-server (main) "No devices detected. after update to xserver-xorg-core 1:1.0.2-0ubuntu10.3 (dup-of: 57153)" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/57345 [04:01] New bug: #149850 in xorg (main) "Cannot change resolution in Gutsy LiveCD with Vmware" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/149850 [04:30] New bug: #66104 in scim (main) "scim input freezes in various applications" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/66104 [04:30] New bug: #149682 in linux-source-2.6.22 (main) "kernel crash after logo loadup (dup-of: 149661)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/149682 === seb128 [n=seb128@ubuntu/member/seb128] has joined #ubuntu-x [05:00] New bug: #149866 in xserver-xorg-video-ati (main) "Open source radeon driver problems" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/149866 [05:05] New bug: #149868 in xserver-xorg-video-ati (main) "Open source radeon driver problems" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/149868 [06:10] New bug: #149559 in gxine (universe) "Gxine crashes on launch with BadMatch error (dup-of: 130696)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/149559 [07:00] New bug: #146228 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.22 (restricted) "Gutsy Reboot on Resume, nvidia-glx-new and linux-2.6.22-12" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/146228 [07:45] New bug: #149929 in xorg (main) "X broken by -13 kernel, -12 still OK" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/149929 [07:48] bah, seems that there are no RM's available to let the new ati through [09:06] New bug: #149952 in xserver-xorg-video-nv (main) "Gutsy Regression: Nvidia Riva 128 not supported (Cairo errors)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/149952 [09:24] tepsipakki: no luck? it's uploaded but in the review queue? [09:32] tormod: right [09:35] when is the hard freeze? [09:36] no idea.. [09:42] the RC release is the 11th, so there should be some days [10:41] tormod, wow yeah I wonder how we hadn't run into issues with those sed lines before [10:42] hi bryce [10:43] yeah it's quite a mess [10:44] bryce: I thought I found another dupe of 127008, but they say it's still broken: bug #128526 [10:44] Launchpad bug 128526 in xresprobe "probing for X, causes scrambled Frame Buffer (dup-of: 127008)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/128526 [10:44] Launchpad bug 127008 in xresprobe "Alternate install of Tribe-4 corrupts video display when installing packages (affected hardware includes Santa Rosa)" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/127008 [10:54] tormod: hmm, I wish solfred had given some details beyond just "still broke" [10:58] you'd expect that to be "exactly same as before" but I am not 100% he's got the same issue as the reporter. [10:58] "same problem" often means "I have a problem too with a similar card" :) [10:59] actually the F4 workaround doesn't work for him, so maybe he's got something else. [11:18] right [11:18] if I had a dollar for every time I heard, "I have the same problem, except I am running a completely different driver, on a different version of Ubuntu" [11:28] bryce: well, X still works even if the modes line has cruft :/ [11:38] yes, if no modes are lost, it's maybe no practical problem, just looks stupid [11:39] right :) [12:00] New bug: #149957 in xorg (main) "Cannot install Gutsy Beta on Samsung R60+" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/149957