/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2007/10/09/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

=== DarkMageZ [n=richard@ppp121-44-55-148.lns10.syd7.internode.on.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
cwong1asac: hey there,  I finally got my system up and running and with access to the git repository.01:32
cwong1asac: I am now running gusty and "git" is slightly different on gusty.  Can you help me with that?01:33
gnomefreakUbulette: ff3 no text boxes showing up on ubuntufourms.org  is this a known issue02:03
gnomefreakUbulette: nevermind it was a user issue (maybe not restarted after update)02:06
=== mode/#ubuntu-mozillateam [+o gnomefreak] by ChanServ
=== mode/#ubuntu-mozillateam [+b *!*n=wii@*.abo.wanadoo.fr] by gnomefreak
=== mode/#ubuntu-mozillateam [-o gnomefreak] by ChanServ
IdleOnegetting an error : could not execute child process firefox granparadiso ( no such file or directory ) after upgrade to ubuntu203:33
gnomefreakIdleOne: ubuntu3 should be out03:39
IdleOneheh ok03:40
IdleOnelet me check03:40
IdleOnegnomefreak: my repos dont seem to have it yet. I am using archive.ubuntu.com03:44
IdleOnethere it is03:46
gnomefreaksorry my fault it is 203:46
IdleOnelmao freaks me out how I hit the servers and it isnt there and a minute later i get a upgrade notcie03:46
gnomefreakwas thinking of another package. try instead of using gp use firefox-3.0 and make the icon use that03:47
IdleOnegnomefreak: ubuntu2 is not working for me03:47
gnomefreaksee if that helps as granparadiso is a dummy package03:47
IdleOnewhat is the command for firefox3.0?03:47
IdleOnenm think i got it03:48
gnomefreaknot sure use menu03:48
gnomefreak.win 1703:48
IdleOne.win 17?03:48
IdleOnehaha that wasnt meant for this window03:49
gnomefreakasac: JanC has ffox 2 and 3 hanging with or without extensions shes running some more differnet things to see if they help03:50
IdleOnegnomefreak: thanks that helped03:51
gnomefreakIdleOne: yw03:51
gnomefreakUbulette: we really need to do something about -gp as it seems it wont launch being a dummy package, IdleOne please explain this to Ubulette when you see him03:51
IdleOnegnomefreak: sure thing03:52
gnomefreakty03:52
=== gnomefreak really getting yelled at again, night
=== AlinuxOS [n=vsichi@host72-133-dynamic.16-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== tonyyarusso wonders what on earth is going on at the gnomefreak household lately
IdleOnewife is probably a lil pissed about the amount of time he spends on the computer.04:45
IdleOneI know my wife gets mad at me now and then04:45
IdleOneso he needs to go and cuddle for a few days hehe04:46
DarkMageZyou just need to take her out somewhere on one of the weekend days.05:47
=== PatrickWeb [n=PatrickW@AMarseille-256-1-55-122.w90-4.abo.wanadoo.fr] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== PatrickWeb [n=PatrickW@AMarseille-256-1-65-42.w90-4.abo.wanadoo.fr] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== jonasj [n=test@82.143.235.237] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
jonasji don't know if this is the right place to ask, but does anyone know if there are plans to make easy codec installation work with the totem firefox plugin as well?10:22
asacjonasj: it doesn't work?10:36
asacjonasj: totem has easy codec installation from what i know10:37
jonasjtotem has10:37
asacwould be strange if it doesn't work in plugin (but might be the case)10:37
jonasjif i open a movie in totem, it asks to get codecs10:37
jonasjalso if i open a stream in totem10:37
jonasjbut not with the plugin10:37
asacok10:37
asacthere is nothing one can do from firefox pov10:37
jonasjyou can just rightclick the plugin and say "open in movie player", and it will search for codecs10:38
asacplease ask on #ubuntu-desktop ... or file a wishlist bug to support easy-codec in totem plugin10:38
jonasjbut it would be more discoverable if it gave the yellow bar in the top like with missing plugins10:38
asaclet me ask for you :)10:38
jonasjniec :)10:38
asacok they don't know ... i would suggest that you file a bug10:39
asachttps://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/totem/+filebug10:39
jonasjwill do so10:40
jonasjthx10:40
asacnp ... sorry that i couldn't help, but its a feature that totem has to implement on its own10:40
jonasjasac: hmm, turns out it used to work, but upstream removed the functionality with no explanation... oh well. https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/totem/+bug/8907210:56
ubotuLaunchpad bug 89072 in totem "Totem-mozilla doesn't request codecs" [Wishlist,Confirmed] 10:56
bluekujaheya asac11:06
bluekujaeverything fine there?11:06
bluekujaI'm doing another partial upgrade to gutsy11:06
asacyeah ... close to your TODO :)11:06
bluekujaoh great :D11:07
asacpartial?11:07
bluekujayup11:07
asacwhy?11:07
asacdo a full upgrade ... everything else will complain :)11:07
asacfail i mean11:07
asacbluekuja: is the branch done?11:07
bluekujaasac: not yet, next todo after upgrading my pc11:08
bluekujaasac: gonna ping you when done11:08
asacpretty late for a MOTU to upgrade now to gutsy ;)11:08
bluekujait was already upgraded11:08
bluekujabut with partial upgrade11:09
bluekujaso I had gutsy repos11:09
bluekujabut forget to update everytime with update-manager popup11:09
bluekujaon the right-top side11:09
bluekujaasac: so in fact I was on gutsy since the beginning of september11:10
asacok :)11:10
bluekujaasac: have you ever heard about partial upgrade?11:11
bluekujaor I'm the only one who did it?11:11
asaci honestly don't know what you are talking about :)11:11
bluekujaoh great :)11:11
asacsometimes the upgrade app asks me if i want to do a partial upgrade11:11
asacno idea if you mean that11:11
bluekujayeah, that's it11:11
bluekuja:)11:11
asacbut i think thats because some depends are not yet fulfillable11:12
bluekujayeah11:12
asace.g. _all packages are available, while _amd64 packages are still on the buildd or something11:12
bluekujaI should apt-get upgrade instead11:12
asacbluekuja: apt-get upgrade is partial upgrade imo11:12
asacapt-get dist-upgrade is full one11:12
bluekujaI'll try to see what I get with dist-upgrade after doing this partial one11:13
bluekujaasac: I had some problems with gutsy at the beginning of semptember11:14
bluekujaasac: for cd rom and other stuff drivers11:14
bluekujapc was unusable11:14
bluekujahad to move back to feisty for a while11:15
bluekujauntil next kernel release11:15
bluekujanow everything seems to be fine11:15
bluekujaasac: is there any chance to get icedove in ubuntu?11:16
asacbluekuja: why? we have thunderbird ;)11:18
asacbluekuja: anyway, until all mozilla apps are xulrunner based i am not allowed to upload new mozilla copies :)11:19
bluekujaasac: icedove features are the same of thunderbird?11:19
asacyes11:19
bluekujaasac: nvm then11:19
asacjust a different branding11:19
asacmaybe they are not 100% in sync11:20
bluekujaasac: best mail client is thunderbird atm, right?11:20
bluekujafor features et all11:20
asacdepends on your requirements. but with lightning-extension i don't see any reason to use evolution anymore11:20
bluekujatrue thing11:21
bluekujaI tested lightning-extension yesterday11:21
bluekujaand that's a pretty useful app11:21
asacthe UI isn't yet perfect, but it more or less does its job11:21
asacyes.11:21
bluekujaasac: did you ever tried out apple mail?11:22
asacno apple here :)11:22
asacor is it a free software application?11:23
bluekujammm...11:23
bluekujano it's not11:23
bluekujaasac: not an apple lover there?11:23
bluekujaasac: restarting everything, brb in 10 mins11:47
asacUbulette: haha ... i suck ;) ... i took the time to document the changes of the ffox prod->.dev merge in the commit log and forgot the most important part :)12:27
asacUbulette: fixed ... overwritten rev 108 ;)12:27
=== rexbron [n=rexbron@62.6.158.161] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== bluekuja [n=andrea@ubuntu/member/bluekuja] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
bluekujaasac back01:04
bluekujadamn, my keyboard settings got changed to en01:04
=== asac_ [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== PatrickWeb [n=PatrickW@AMarseille-256-1-65-42.w90-4.abo.wanadoo.fr] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== bluekuja [n=andrea@ubuntu/member/bluekuja] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
bluekujaasac_: you there?01:15
=== DarkMageZ [n=richard@ppp121-44-55-148.lns10.syd7.internode.on.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
bluekujaasac: let me know when back ;)01:24
=== gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
gnomefreakbunch of people filing bugs about 64bit sys. and flashplugin-nonfree but none of them state snpluginwrapper :(01:43
asacgnomefreak: ?02:07
asacis it broken?02:07
asacgnomefreak: show me a bug02:08
asacbnworks for me02:10
=== tonyyarusso [n=anthony@ubuntu/member/tonyyarusso] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
bluekujaasac: any news?04:38
asaccwong1: there?04:51
asacbluekuja: now looking04:51
bluekujaasac: you rock thanks :)04:51
asacbluekuja: .upstream branch doesn't have any new revision04:52
asacis it just a bugfix?04:52
bluekujaasac: yup, mere bug fix04:52
asacbluekuja: your bzr log doesn't tell me were development for this revision starts ... or where the last upload happened04:53
asacbluekuja: usually you should create new changelog entry right after release with UNRELEASED04:53
bluekujaasac: let me tell you04:53
asacand then for upload update date and to gutsy ;)04:54
asacyeah04:54
asactell me the revision that was in the last upload04:54
bluekujaasac: rev. no. 504:54
bluekujais the previous upload04:54
bluekujaasac: no04:54
bluekujaasac: rev .no 404:55
bluekuja;)04:55
bluekujadeleting gpc folder, which is not-free so cannot be distributed. Updating changelog revision.04:55
bluekujathat's the previous upload04:55
bluekuja5-6-7-8-9 are new04:55
bluekujafor this upload04:55
asacbluekuja: why remove the if ENABLE_GPC blocks instead of taking care that ENABLE_GPC isn't true?04:58
asacbluekuja: its --disable-gpc from what i see04:58
gnomefreakasac: jan didnt give me a bug, iirc jan is canonical employee but i will ask her to report one when i see her (thought i did ask her to report one)04:58
bluekujaasac: which revision?04:59
asacbluekuja: you shouldn't need to patch configure.in either04:59
asacbzr diff -r4..504:59
asacgnomefreak: jan? which nick?04:59
gnomefreakJanC05:00
gnomefreakim 99% sure she is05:00
bluekujaasac: that patch was already there05:00
bluekujaasac: I just cleaned up05:00
asacyou told me that 5 is new05:00
asacanyway ... that patch isn't needed imo05:00
asac--disable-gpc should be enough05:01
asacif not, then that should be fixed instea05:01
bluekujaasac: was added by rene05:01
asachmm05:01
bluekujaand it's needed05:01
asacwell .. --disable-gpc? and fixing the SUBDIRS AC_OUTPUT dependent on the ENABLE_GPC var05:01
asacanyway ... just remember to look into it05:01
bluekujaok05:01
asacbluekuja: so maintainer mode patch is yours?05:03
bluekujaasac: nope05:03
asacso its not new either?05:03
asacsee how hard its even for you to see what is new :)05:04
asacpleaes tell me _which_ revisions belong to this release :)05:04
asacbluekuja: see bzr log05:04
bluekujaasac: for new I mean needed for the new release05:04
asacyou committed the revision 4..5 patch on 7 oct05:04
asacthats definitly new05:04
asacbluekuja: yes ... then tell me how you get those patches?05:05
asacso we can still redo 4..5 :)05:05
bluekujaasac: debian BTS05:05
bluekujaI told you that some days ago05:05
asacok ... maintainer mode patch is ok05:05
asac01_disable_gpc patch should be redone if possible to tackle the real issue05:05
asacdrop the patch and see what is needed to make --disable-gpc work properly05:05
asacthen you can send the patch upstream05:06
bluekujaasac: mmm..why is not needed?05:06
asacthe rest is good05:06
bluekujait was added since 2.405:06
asacread the patch05:06
asacyou remove checks for if ENABLE_GPC ... which thus appear to be true05:07
asacso pass --disable-gpc on configure and autogen.sh and see how you can fix it in a way that it works even if the directory doesn't exist05:07
asacfor that you have to make the AC_OUTPUT make file dependent on ENABLE_GPC05:07
asacin configure.in05:07
asacand the SUBDIRS variable dependent on ENABLE_GPC in Makefile.am05:07
asaci configure.ac you ca replace gpc/Makefile in AC_OUTPUT05:08
asacby ${GPC_MAKEFILE}05:08
asacand set GPC_MAKEFILE to gpc/Makefile if ENABLE_GPC is set05:08
asacin Makefile.am you can introduce a variable GPC_SUBDIR = gpc05:09
asacand only set that if ENABLE_GPC05:09
bluekujaasac: maybe I'm watching a bad patch05:09
bluekujaare you looking at no_gpc patch?05:09
bluekujaor  am_maintainer05:09
bluekujaone05:09
gnomefreakasac: shes afk i guess but i asked her for bug number again just incase i forgot last night05:09
bluekujaasac: I removed gpc folder from SUBDIRS05:10
bluekujaand from makefile05:10
asacbluekuja: yes read what i wrote05:10
asacits about no_gpc patch05:11
bluekujaasac: just to know, what's the problem on having the patch that way?05:11
bluekujawe dropped the gpc dir05:12
bluekujaremoved references05:12
bluekujadisabled from building05:12
bluekujawith --disable-gpc05:12
asacno05:12
asacyou don't use that05:12
asacdrop the patch ... use that ...  and see were it breaks05:12
asacif you do it like i say, the patch can be included upstream05:12
asacyour patch is a hack :)05:13
bluekuja^^05:13
asacand since the right solution is simple i would fix it for real05:13
bluekujaasac: let me see if it works05:13
asacit doesn't05:13
asacread what i wrote05:13
asacthose two changes are needed05:13
asacinstead of the patch ;)05:13
bluekujayeah05:14
bluekujaI removed the patch05:14
bluekujaadding --disable-gpc to configure05:14
bluekuja*autogen05:15
asacyeas05:18
asacyou have create a new patch05:18
asacthat fixes configure.in AC_OUTPUT05:18
asacand Makefile.am subdirs05:18
asacbut not just removing, but making them dependent on whether --disable-gpc is passed.. i outlined it above05:18
bluekujaasac: that's harder05:20
bluekujaasac: a patch that applied fixes configure.in/makefile and add --disable-gpc to rules?05:21
bluekujaso if disabled05:21
bluekujamakes it dependent to it05:21
bluekujaenabled/disabled05:21
asacyes05:39
asacbluekuja: ^^05:40
bluekujaasac: so a patch that removes gpc stuff configure.in/makefile plus adding a --disable-gpc on debian/rules05:40
asacbluekuja: no ... it doesn't remove gpc ... it makes it dependent on whether its --disable-gpc or not05:45
asacremoving wouldn't be better than what we have right now05:46
asacbluekuja: i outlined how you can do that above05:46
bluekujaasac: I've understood I need a new patch05:48
bluekujaasac: I just dont understand how can I make it dependent on that variable05:48
bluekujaasac: only thing is to delete manually gpc stuff in the makefile/configure and a variable in debian/rules05:49
asacbluekuja: i outlined it above05:49
asac17:07 < asac> for that you have to make the AC_OUTPUT make file dependent on ENABLE_GPC05:49
asac17:07 < asac> in configure.in05:50
asac17:07 < asac> and the SUBDIRS variable dependent on ENABLE_GPC in Makefile.am05:50
asac17:08 < asac> i configure.ac you ca replace gpc/Makefile in AC_OUTPUT05:50
asac17:08 < asac> by ${GPC_MAKEFILE}05:50
asac17:08 < asac> and set GPC_MAKEFILE to gpc/Makefile if ENABLE_GPC is set05:50
asac17:09 < asac> in Makefile.am you can introduce a variable GPC_SUBDIR = gpc05:50
asac17:09 < asac> and only set that if ENABLE_GPC05:50
asacbluekuja: ^^^05:50
bluekujaasac: that's the patch plus I add --disable-gpc on debian/rules05:51
bluekuja?05:51
bluekujaasac: I'm getting crazy05:53
bluekuja:)05:53
asacyeah05:55
bluekujaasac: restarting pc for a while06:12
cwong1asac: hey06:18
cwong1asac: tx for taken care of the uncommit06:18
asaccwong1: let me know when you have it up ... so i can release ;)06:19
cwong1asac: ok06:20
=== bluekuja [n=andrea@ubuntu/member/bluekuja] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
bluekujaasac: back06:49
bluekujaasac: what we will have different from the current situation?06:53
bluekujaasac: e.g what will change06:54
bluekujaasac: I dont understand why we need to make changes for a dir that doesnt exist06:59
bluekujaand wont exist in debian for copyright issues06:59
asacbluekuja: because we don't want to carry patches that are not needed07:10
asacits always better to do it right and submit upstream07:10
asacthan carrying a hack forever07:10
bluekujaasac: but upstream will keep shipping gpc07:14
bluekujaI guess07:14
=== rexbron [n=rexbron@62.6.158.161] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
asacthink ;)07:25
asacit doesn't matter ... it just fixes the --enable/disable-gpc option07:25
asacin a way that we can strip the dir07:25
asacnothing upstream wouldn't like about it07:25
cwong1asac:My files are in. Tested the build locally. Please go ahead and do the release.07:29
bluekujaasac: true, I need to find out how to do it. I have your first istructions07:32
bluekujabut I need to move on07:32
=== bdmurray [n=bdmurray@mylar.outflux.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
bdmurrayAre there any known issues with svg rendering in Firefox?07:45
Ubulettehi08:07
=== IdleOne [n=idleone@unaffiliated/idleone] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
Ubuletteasac, I don't get why you included remove.binonly.sh in ff3.dev, it's not needed08:20
Ubulettehttp://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=57158309:33

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!