/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2007/10/15/#launchpad.txt

=== RAOF [n=chris@123-243-65-41.tpgi.com.au] has joined #launchpad
=== doko [n=doko@dslb-088-073-125-209.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #launchpad
=== ianm_ [n=yella@190.172.171.169] has left #launchpad []
=== bigon [n=bigon@ubuntu/member/bigon] has joined #launchpad
=== danilos [n=danilo@adsl-236-193.eunet.yu] has joined #launchpad
=== merriam [n=merriam@85-211-143-106.dyn.gotadsl.co.uk] has joined #launchpad
=== AnMaster [n=AnMaster@unaffiliated/anmaster] has joined #launchpad
=== SLaPoet [n=wpearson@user-38lm58r.cable.mindspring.com] has joined #launchpad
=== lakin [n=lakin@S01060013101832ce.cg.shawcable.net] has joined #launchpad
=== poolie [n=mbp@ppp112-44.static.internode.on.net] has joined #launchpad
=== jordi [n=jordi@115.Red-213-96-69.staticIP.rima-tde.net] has joined #launchpad
=== pitoow [n=nao_@200-138-222-226.fnsce702.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br] has joined #launchpad
=== poolie_ [n=mbp@ppp112-44.static.internode.on.net] has joined #launchpad
=== SLaPoet_ [n=wpearson@user-38lm58r.cable.mindspring.com] has joined #launchpad
=== ubuntulog [i=ubuntulo@trider-g7.fabbione.net] has joined #launchpad
=== Topic for #launchpad: https://launchpad.net | Next developer meeting: Thu 18 Oct 2007, 1400UTC | List: launchpad-users@lists.canonical.com | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | Help: https://help.launchpad.net | Channel logs: http://tinyurl.com/72w39
=== Topic (#launchpad): set by mrevell at Thu Oct 11 18:18:01 2007
=== radekp [n=Miranda@194.213.45.237] has joined #launchpad
=== _nand__ [n=ec4@138.202-128-194.unknown.qala.com.sg] has joined #launchpad
radekphi, i have registered CVS import for dotgnu-pnet project, the page is here: https://code.launchpad.net/dotgnu-pnet/trunk It is now importing only module "pnet", is there a way how to make it import all modules in the repository?07:46
=== Starting logfile irclogs/launchpad.log
=== ubuntulog [i=ubuntulo@ubuntu/bot/ubuntulog] has joined #launchpad
=== Topic for #launchpad: https://launchpad.net | Next developer meeting: Thu 18 Oct 2007, 1400UTC | List: launchpad-users@lists.canonical.com | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | Help: https://help.launchpad.net | Channel logs: http://tinyurl.com/72w39
=== Topic (#launchpad): set by mrevell at Thu Oct 11 18:18:01 2007
jameshradekp: you'd need to create separate imports for the other modules. (possibly registering separate projects for them, if appropriate)08:14
=== bigon [n=bigon@ubuntu/member/bigon] has joined #launchpad
=== ddaa [n=ddaa@canonical/launchpad/ddaa] has joined #launchpad
radekpjamesh: thanks, but then i would have to do bzr pull for each module - right?08:17
jameshradekp: yes.08:17
jameshradekp: I guess the question is: if you ran "bzr commit", at what granularity would you expect the commit to occur?08:18
radekpjamesh: i understand, when we use CVS we have to commit for each module08:21
radekpjamesh:  imho it was bad decision to have this layout (each module for subproject that are tightly coupled)08:22
radekpjamesh: we'll have to live with this somehow, thanks for help08:23
jameshradekp: the other question to ask is "if I was going to create a branch to develop a new feature, how much of the repository would I branch?"08:25
jameshthe answers to those questions would help in deciding where the branch boundaries should be08:26
=== bigon [n=bigon@ubuntu/member/bigon] has joined #launchpad
radekpjamesh: if you want to develop one new feature, then you'll touch at least 2 modules in CVS08:28
radekpjamesh: if you commit only one module, then the other can get broken08:29
jameshradekp: are you planning on migrating the dotgnu-pnet project over to Bazaar completely, or is this just for your own work?08:30
radekpjamesh:  this project will always have main trunk on savannah08:31
=== carlos [n=carlos@canonical/launchpad/carlos] has joined #launchpad
carlosmorning08:31
jameshradekp: you mean a CVS trunk on Savannah, or any version control system on Savannah?08:32
radekpjamesh: CVS trunk08:32
radekpjamesh: but we could use launchpad for developing new features - when they are tested we commit them to CVS08:33
FujitsuWhy are you so attached to CVS?08:33
Odd_BlokeFujitsu: I think they're attached to Savannah. :p08:34
jameshwell, Savannah supports hosting with a number of VCS types, iirc08:34
jameshwhich was why I asked my question08:34
radekpjamesh:  last time i checked it was only CVS, but maybe they added SVN support now08:36
radekpjamesh:  i guess this could solve the problem08:37
FujitsuThey seem to have git, so they must have others too.08:37
jameshradekp: my understanding was that they had GNU Arch support, which is effectively dumb-server file access (i.e. they publish whatever you upload)08:37
jameshwhich would probably be sufficient to publish Bazaar branches08:38
radekphttps://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/WhenSvN08:39
jameshhttps://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/UsingGnuArch makes it sound like you could publish a branch to sftp://arch.sv.gnu.org/archives/project/something08:41
radekpjamesh:  yes, it looks like it could be used for bazaar then, i will try08:43
radekpjamesh: thanks for information, you was very helpful08:44
jameshit looks like you wouldn't have any viewvc type tools though.  But people would still be able to do "bzr branch" from it (either via sftp or http)08:45
radekpjamesh: yes, that could be nice08:47
jameshradekp: of course, you can register any branches you host on savannah with Launchpad08:47
jameshthey'll then be regularly mirrored, which will make them available in our branch browser08:48
radekpjamesh:  that would be even nicer :)08:49
=== elkbuntu [n=melissa@ubuntu/member/elkbuntu] has joined #launchpad
=== sabdfl [i=sabdfl@ubuntu/member/pdpc.silver.sabdfl] has joined #launchpad
=== danilos [n=danilo@adsl-236-193.eunet.yu] has joined #launchpad
=== dneary [n=dneary@mne69-9-88-163-116-163.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #launchpad
=== Hobbsee [n=Hobbsee@ubuntu/member/hobbsee] has joined #launchpad
=== superm1 [n=superm1@ubuntu/member/superm1] has joined #launchpad
=== Hobbsee waves
=== Hobbsee hugs mpt
FujitsuThat wouldn't be for giving our portlet back, would it?09:51
Hobbseeyes09:51
Hobbseealthough it's not on edge yet, it seems09:51
Hobbseeooh, wait, yes it is!09:52
FujitsuIt was there yesterday.09:52
Hobbseerev #'s are screwed, but it's there09:52
FujitsuBut the proper one isn't.09:52
Hobbseewonder why it's the bottom panel09:52
Hobbseeno?  which was the proper one?09:52
Fujitsur5008 is the proper one. It was09:53
FujitsuBah.09:53
FujitsuIt was readded in r4997, but something was bad about it,it seems.09:53
=== beuno [n=beuno@44-111-231-201.fibertel.com.ar] has joined #launchpad
HobbseeFujitsu: i didnt like the r4997 version, and whinged about it.09:54
HobbseeFujitsu: er, i think it was that one.  oh well09:54
FujitsuWhat was wrong with it?09:54
Hobbseeit only showed the current source package version, and only when you clicked on the status, etc.09:54
FujitsuYou mean you didn't like the one hidden under the task?09:54
Hobbseenope09:55
FujitsuThat's not the r4997 one.09:55
Hobbseeoh, then i never saw that one09:55
FujitsuYes you did. You can see it on edge now.09:56
Hobbseeoh, then i'm confused.  so we've never seen the proper one?09:56
FujitsuWell, I think it'll be the same, but it was displaying in the wrong contexts or something. The comment in the bug isn't clear to me.09:57
=== Standley [n=Singer@97-166-223-203.wol.net.pk] has joined #launchpad
=== bigjools [n=ed@canonical/launchpad/bigjools] has joined #launchpad
Hobbseebigjools!10:09
bigjoolshello10:09
Hobbseebigjools: please fix $mypetbug :D10:09
bigjoolsjoin the very long queue ;)10:10
Hobbseebigjools: awww, please?10:10
Hobbseebigjools: it's entirely and utterly blocking my release management work.10:10
bigjoolsit won't be done until next LP cycle I'm afraid10:10
Hobbseedamn.10:10
bigjoolsit's too late to go into the current one, and since it's not a critical bug it won't get cherry picked10:11
bigjoolssorry 'bout that10:11
=== Hobbsee mumbles about how it only effects all of one person.
=== Hobbsee also mumbles about the fact that it *is* a critical bug in that module.
Hobbseebut, probably doesnt come under the launchpad version of critical, whatever that is.10:12
=== schwuk [n=dave@ubuntu/member/schwuk] has joined #launchpad
=== mrevell_ [n=matthew@77-100-239-119.cable.ubr05.wolv.blueyonder.co.uk] has joined #launchpad
Hobbseegood morning mrevell_ 10:13
=== mrevell_ is now known as mrevell
=== allenap [n=allenap@87-194-166-60.bethere.co.uk] has joined #launchpad
mrevellhi Hobbsee10:16
Hobbseemrevell: is it possible to get a list of what launchpad defines as "critical"?10:16
Hobbseemrevell: there was a policy which you all had to read, but i dont think it was ever published.10:16
=== Hobbsee is curious to see what's in it
mrevellHobbsee: Let me look into that. It may be a few hours before I can get back to you, though.10:17
FujitsuFrom the meetings I've seen, Critical means `wants cherrypicking', but I'm not sure what's used to define that.10:18
HobbseeFujitsu: yes, exactly.10:18
=== Hobbsee would have thought "if it makes the module unusable, or otherwise unsafe to use" was one of the determinates of critical bugs.
FujitsuIt is unsafe, but there is a slightly acceptable workaround in place.10:20
HobbseeFujitsu: called not using the UI.  yeah.10:20
Hobbseeoh well.10:20
mwhudsonmrevell: hi, there were several enquiries about beta team membership over the weekend10:21
mrevellmwhudson: Anything in particular?10:22
FujitsuHobbsee: The UI is usable, but only the needs-root-on-drescher one. A great UI that is, but one all the same.10:22
HobbseeFujitsu: ah, looks like others are doing bits of it anyway.  so, for gutsy+1, this sort of stuff will be useful.10:22
HobbseeFujitsu: yeah, but i dont have that :)10:22
FujitsuNoted.10:22
mwhudsonmrevell: no, not really, i just promised that i'd give you a prod on monday morning :)10:22
mwhudsonpeople saying they'd applied, what do they do now10:23
mrevellmwhudson: Thanks :) I see. Looks like there's a bit of a backlog from the weekend actually. I tend not to go near a computer at the weekend these days.10:23
mwhudsonmrevell: smart man :)10:23
mrevell:)10:24
mptFujitsu, Hobbsee: 4997 showed the correct box for distribution packages, but showed the distribution table (the same one that's on the right of <http://launchpad.net/ubuntu>) if no package was specified10:34
mptThat's what I fixed in r500810:34
mptBut any revision later than r4997 should be enough to make you happy10:35
mpt(in that page, at least)10:35
Hobbseempt: woot, thankyou ;)10:35
mptHobbsee, I can also answer your question about Critical10:36
mptbut not definitively10:36
mptThe relevant bit is "an essential feature of a launchpad application fails for a proportion of users"10:36
Fujitsumpt: Aha, thanks!10:36
mptbut it's still undecided what proportion that should be.10:37
mptFujitsu, however, we probably will need to find some solution that isn't dependent on the context10:40
mptbecause we want to make bug pages less context-sensitive10:40
Hobbseempt: ah right10:40
mpt(or at least, context-independent enough that Google groups them under "Google found several pages similar to this one...")10:41
FujitsuYeah, I can see why it was removed, but it can make things more difficult for us.10:41
FujitsuYay, we have the component again.10:41
=== Hobbsee assumed it was a ratio of how badly it was broken and hwo many people it effected, vs how big the change was, and how much else i tmight have effected.
=== Fujitsu doesn't recognise all 16000 source packages, unfortunately.
=== silwol [n=silwol@193.170.124.193] has joined #launchpad
mptWhich bits of info do you use in the box, besides version and component?10:42
Hobbseemaintainer10:42
Fujitsu(also, that component isn't always right, which there's another bug about...)10:42
FujitsuAnd uploader.10:42
HobbseeFujitsu: oh, is this the binary/source differing components bug?10:42
mpthmm10:43
Hobbseempt: btw - urgency is completely unnecessary there10:43
mptIn other words, pretty much all of it10:43
mptHobbsee, ok10:43
mptUrgency is release-specific, I assume10:43
mptand "Low" 99% of the time?10:43
Hobbseempt: because everything in ubuntu is urgency=low - we dont use it at all10:43
FujitsuHobbsee: No, it's the bug that I filed months back about the portal only showing the data from when the current distrosourcepackagerelease was first published, so any component changes are unseen.10:43
mptoh, 100% of the time :-=)10:43
mptok10:43
FujitsuOnly Debian uses urgency, as we don't have testing.10:44
Hobbseempt: well, unless we happen to sync a version of urgency=high from debian10:44
HobbseeFujitsu: oh nice...10:44
FujitsuBug #9329310:44
ubotuLaunchpad bug 93293 in soyuz "Details in source package portlet don't change without new upload" [Low,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/93293 - Assigned to Julian Edwards (julian-edwards)10:44
FujitsuHm, targetted for this release, it seems.10:44
bigjoolsFujitsu: it hasn't been done10:45
Fujitsubigjools: Ah, again.10:45
bigjoolsindeed.  It's low priority so other stuff trumped it.  Soyuz is a very busy place at the moment :/10:45
FujitsuYep.10:45
=== Fujitsu mumbles something about open source being better because people can fix things themselves, then hides under a thick rock.
bigjoolsPPA and partner archive fixes took most of the work in this cycle10:46
FujitsuWhat's special about partner? Publishing to an entirely separate archive?10:47
bigjoolsFujitsu: I honestly don't think that would have helped in this case, because our reviewers only have so much time also :)10:47
Hobbseempt: why do we show the 'initially uploaded to $version" at all?10:47
=== mwhudson wonders whether it would be COMPLETELY unfair to say that you probably need the motivation of money to look at soyuz code...
Fujitsubigjools: This is true.10:47
bigjoolsyes, partner is a totally different archive10:47
=== bigjools winks at mwhudson
mptHobbsee, I don't know, sabdfl wrote that code10:47
Hobbseemwhudson: some of us care about whether it works, and want to fix it when ti's seriously, utterly broken, and blocking our work.10:48
Hobbseempt: i dont think we need it - it's duplicated on the overview page - and reasonably confusing anyway10:48
=== Fujitsu wonders what happened to DRY with +queue.
mptok10:48
HobbseeFujitsu: DRY?10:48
mwhudsonHobbsee: yes yes, please don't mistake what i said for a serious remark10:48
Hobbseemwhudson: :)10:48
FujitsuHobbsee: Don't Repeat Yourself.10:48
HobbseeFujitsu: ah10:48
mptotherwise known as "parsimony"10:48
=== bigjools wonders how long it will be before all typed sentences have an acronym
Fujitsubigjools: RSN.10:49
bigjoolsFujitsu: NFW!10:49
mptbigjools, last time I was in rec.humor.oracle.d some posts were almost entirely acronymized.10:49
mpt(IYKWIM. AITYD.)10:50
bigjoolsthat's.....disturbing10:50
FujitsuHah.10:50
=== kompressor [n=kompress@vc-196-207-45-241.3g.vodacom.co.za] has joined #launchpad
mptHobbsee, Fujitsu, so, things you need: Latest release version, uploader, maintainer, component. Things you don't need: urgency, architectures, "initially uploaded to". Correct?10:51
Fujitsumpt: Yep, and preferably with the component being real.10:51
Hobbseempt: yup10:51
mptRight.10:51
bigjoolsDo you know what the 7th/8th place playoff is called in the Rugby World Cup?  The Bledisloe Cup!10:51
Hobbseempt: can i bug you with some queue UI bugs too, by any chance?  or want me to do so later?10:51
=== dragon-64 [n=dragon-6@74-142-24-38.dhcp.insightbb.com] has joined #launchpad
Fujitsu"Initially uploaded to" I use, but very rarely. It's useful for detecting packages that were synced from Joe Random's repository in Hoary/Breezy, and not touched since.10:52
sabdflmpt, Hobbsee: because, in the case of syncs, we should be able to show that a package is essentially unchanged from its original upload10:52
=== intellectronica [i=intellec@nat/canonical/x-9f3a17a49f1f7c0d] has joined #launchpad
FujitsuUrgency isn't used, and architectures are overriden.10:52
Hobbseesabdfl: done by the version number.10:52
mptHobbsee, sure, if you first tell me what you mean by "queue"10:52
Hobbseesabdfl: and done by the uploader10:52
sabdflHobbsee: ?10:53
mptHobbsee, but where do you see the version number of the original upload?10:53
Hobbseesabdfl: knowing what a sync is, and what it isnt.10:53
Hobbseempt: oh, *original* upload?10:53
Hobbseeon the overview tab.10:53
Hobbseewhy do you want to see the original upload?10:53
mptI don't know! :-)10:54
mptI'm just taking notes here10:54
Hobbseempt: that was to sabdfl, not to you10:54
mptProbably we can extract "stuff that is useful on the bug page" from "stuff that is useful on the source package's overview"10:58
Hobbseesabdfl: *poke*10:58
Hobbseempt: true.10:58
FujitsuThe maintainer isn't on the overview, but is potentially useful.10:59
Hobbseempt: but i'm unsure as to why you want to know where the package originally came from at all - and which release it was uploaded to really doesnt help with that.10:59
HobbseeFujitsu: uh?  yes it is10:59
HobbseeFujitsu: see https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/basket/1.0.1-1 ?10:59
Hobbseeoh, on hte main overview page11:00
FujitsuHobbsee: Oh, I see, yes.11:00
Hobbseeyes, perhaps11:00
FujitsuNot the main one.11:00
sabdflsoyuz is harder than you think11:00
sabdflhere's the issue - who is the maintainer of a source package?11:00
sabdflwhen you say "apache2 in ubuntu"11:00
Fujitsusabdfl: I can see the issue, yes.11:00
sabdflthere might be 6 different releases11:01
sabdflwith multiple source releases in each version of the distro11:01
sabdfluploaded by different people11:01
sabdflthe "maintainer" is an abstract concept we might layer on top of that11:01
Hobbseesabdfl: in terms of the way ubuntu works, the maintainer listed in the latest upload is the maintainer.11:01
sabdflthat's why we try to call the person who actually posts a specific version the "uploader"11:01
=== Hobbsee notes that the maintainer mangling spec also interferes with this
sabdflHobbsee: ok, so what if there is a security update to dapper, that happens to be the latest upload?11:02
FujitsuThat's how Debian works. The latest sourcepackagerelease is authoritative with regard to maintainer and the like.11:02
Hobbseesabdfl: sorry, latest upload for the development distribution11:02
Hobbseesabdfl: same way the bugs work.11:02
FujitsuHobbsee: Which way the bugs work?11:02
HobbseeFujitsu: bug gets closed if it works in the latest release, task gets opened for the earlier release if someone wants to do a SRU for it.11:03
FujitsuAh.11:03
HobbseeFujitsu: so default bugviews are for the latest release.11:03
Hobbsee(latest ubuntu release)11:03
sabdflwe could definitely do latest-development-uploader, yes11:03
FujitsuHobbsee: That has nothing to do with the LP code, however.11:03
Hobbseesabdfl: i still cant see why you would want to know about hte very original release though11:04
HobbseeFujitsu: oh true, but i would have expected it to all work the same way - so that everyone doesnt get confused11:04
Hobbseempt: sorry for the delay, the queue stuff refers to https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+queue?batch=50011:05
=== Hobbsee got somewhat sidetracked.
mptHobbsee, no worries, I'm reporting a bug about this package details thing11:05
Hobbseempt: of course, the minor UI bugs dont really matter if i cant use the entire section at all, due to the major OMGTSIF bugs.11:05
Hobbseempt: but they would be nice to fix when you're looking for something tiny.11:06
FujitsuTSIF? This <something> is f'ed?11:06
HobbseeFujitsu: The Sky Is Falling.  where have you *been*?11:06
mptWell, I can't do anything about the latter, but I can do something about the former :-)11:07
FujitsuAh.11:07
Hobbseempt: :)11:07
spivFujitsu: heh, I guessed what you guessed.11:07
mptHobbsee, that's a nearly-empty page.11:07
Hobbseempt: yes, but it's missing a few bits11:07
Hobbseempt: flip to the unapproved page.11:07
Hobbseethere's stuff there.11:08
FujitsuHobbsee: He probably can't.11:08
FujitsuWe can't see unapproved.11:08
HobbseeFujitsu: yeah, but he's a launchpad guy, so i dont know how far his permissions go11:08
mptI'm not a Launchpadmin, and I don't see anything saying "Unapproved"11:08
FujitsuNot far enough on production, I'd suspect...11:08
mptone moment11:08
=== Hobbsee wonders if that says something about the UI...
Hobbseempt: the dropdown says NEW at the moment.11:09
mptyeah, probably :-(11:09
mptOk, there's no "Unapproved" option in that menu for me on launchpad.net, but there is on my local copy11:09
Hobbseeshow:  new uploads with names like <search box>11:09
=== Fujitsu guesses that the Soyuz sample data probably doesn't populate the queues.
FujitsuOh, OK.11:09
Hobbseempt: right, well, trust that it does exist then.11:10
mptHobbsee, you guess correctly11:10
Hobbseeand trust that it works the same way as the new queue11:10
Hobbseeas in, there are a whole bunch of packages in it usually, and there are 25 to a page by default11:10
mptwhoops11:10
mpt*Fujitsu*, you guess correctly11:10
Fujitsumpt: I assumed.11:10
HobbseeFujitsu: yeha, at some point someoen actually has to test it out, and find the bugs.11:11
mptHobbsee, you're the first person to use it?11:11
Hobbseempt: yeah, i think so.  first non-canonical person anyway.11:11
mptHobbsee, coming to UDS?11:11
Hobbseempt: all the other archive admins are canonical people, so can just ssh into one of their machines (drescher)11:11
Hobbseempt: no, sorry :(11:11
mptok, no worries11:11
=== Hobbsee has to stay and do uni. boston+1 though, give me an invite, and i'll be ther e:)
Hobbseempt: happy for you to call me, if it makes this stuff easier - i know it's hard for you launchpad people to understand ubuntu practicse11:12
Hobbseempt: the stuff i want fixed is as follows: (and this is the UI section)11:12
Hobbsee#144796)11:12
Hobbseeoops11:12
Hobbsee* No select all checkbox at the top of the queue (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+queue)11:12
Hobbsee* If you accept packages from the UNAPPROVED queue, it says they're accepted, and takes you back to the NEW queue.  This should take you back to the UNAPPROVED queue (but the message is good!)11:12
Hobbsee* The queue page does not show you what the current override for each package is - ie, if it's main/restricted/universe/multiverse11:12
Hobbsee* No accept/decline button at the top of the queue too - only at the bottom11:12
Hobbseempt: put it this way. i'm the only person to use it, and to be blocked if it's broken :)11:13
=== dragon-64 is now known as Dragon-64
mptSooooo ... 100% of people trying to use this feature can't use it11:14
Hobbseempt: yup!11:14
evadavesounds like a feature.11:14
evadaveuh, I mean, bug. 11:14
Hobbseempt: well, can.  but asked not to, due to the one of the OMGTSIF bugs.11:14
Hobbseeevadave: yes, sounds like a damned good feature!  :D11:15
=== silwol [n=silwol@193.170.124.193] has left #launchpad []
poolietsif?11:17
ajmitchHobbsee: you've confused people now11:18
=== Hobbsee notes that we just covered this.
Hobbsee[19:06]  <Fujitsu> TSIF? This <something> is f'ed?11:18
Hobbsee[19:06]  <Hobbsee> Fujitsu: The Sky Is Falling.  where have you *been*?11:18
poolie(ignore me)11:18
Hobbsee:)11:18
Hobbseeajmitch: and this is different to anything previous?11:18
mptHobbsee, since I can't reproduce the bugs you're talking about, it probably would be best for you to report them yourself (sorry!)11:19
mptI will report a bug on the lack of sampledata :-)11:19
Hobbseempt: i thought you were the one who would be fixing them?11:19
mptHobbsee, not necessarily11:19
mptAnd even if I was, I'm all in favor of having just a single tracker for these things11:20
Hobbseempt: you can do it based on just seeing the new queue.11:20
Hobbseehuh?11:20
ajmitchHobbsee: quite true11:20
mptHobbsee, the New queue is empty too!11:20
mptAnd even if it wasn't, I doubt I would see any Accept/Decline buttons11:20
Hobbseeajmitch: can you upload some crack please?11:20
mptso, pix^Wscreenshots plz11:21
Hobbseempt: oh, there's a point.11:21
Hobbseempt: was about to ask if that would be helpful11:21
ajmitchHobbsee: I prefer to keep my skin11:21
mptthank you11:21
Hobbseeajmitch: i would have been able to reject it once he was finished.11:22
Hobbseempt: http://wedontsleep.org/~sarah/launchpad.jpg11:22
mptHobbsee, I meant, in the bug report :-)11:22
Hobbseempt: ah.  didnt know if it was worth filing a bug report - or whether to file the UI requests separately, etc.11:22
Hobbseeseems a bit silly for an entire bug report to say "please add a checkbox here"11:23
mptThat's not silly11:23
Hobbseeok, so you do want separate bugs?11:23
mptWe call our tracker "Bugs", but those kinds of things are equally valid entries in it11:23
mptyes please11:23
Hobbseebut...but...that means i have to use launchpad to file all the separate bugs.11:23
=== Hobbsee tries not to think of the load times.
mptYou're closer to launchpad.net than I am!11:24
Hobbseedoesnt mean it doesnt take a few secnods to load every single freaking page.11:24
FujitsuEdge is particularly shockingly slow.11:24
Hobbseewhich makes doing multiple things with bug pages very annoying11:24
Hobbseeyeah, i should move off edge - i was hoping it would be a bit faster11:25
FujitsuI regularly get >20s to load a page.11:25
mpt>20s? Luxury! ;-)11:26
FujitsuBah.11:26
sabdflHobbsee: it's not the very original release, iirc it's the original distro/series that *this source package* was uploaded to11:29
Hobbseesabdfl: right, but why do you want to know?11:30
=== Hobbsee isnt seeing the use case
HobbseeFujitsu: ouch, mine hasnt been that bad for a while.11:30
ubotuNew bug: #152878 in malone "Source package details box hampers bug page context-independence" [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/15287811:31
Fujitsusabdfl: You mean this sourcepackagerelease, rather than sourcepackage?11:31
Hobbseempt: oh yay, now there's an extra bug i see that i want fixed :)11:31
Hobbseehum, i thought there was a "report another bug" option on there a while ago.11:32
FujitsuHobbsee: Down the bottom.11:32
FujitsuNot the usual button.11:32
HobbseeFujitsu: ah.11:33
=== Hobbsee didnt do the page search, as she usually does
Hobbseetext search works remarkably well, for websites that like moving their buttons around.11:33
Hobbseempt: want me to subscribe you to all of them?11:34
ubotuNew bug: #152880 in soyuz "no select all packages checkbox at the top of https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+queue" [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/15288011:35
mptHobbsee, no thanks, I see all Launchpad bugmail already11:35
Hobbseempt: ok, cool11:35
FujitsuWhy are those links down the bottom, anyway?11:36
FujitsuThe rest have a button in the top right.11:37
HobbseeFujitsu: so they dont get found?  it's the idea of reporting less bugs.11:37
sabdflFujitsu: yes11:37
FujitsuHobbsee: Ah, good point.11:37
sabdflHobbsee: imagine there are 12 derivatives of ubuntu in LP11:38
mptHobbsee, people didn't find it in its previous position11:38
sabdflyou want to know which packages have been changed11:38
Hobbseempt: hehe :)11:38
Hobbseempt: seems people dont find buttons much at all, sometimes :)11:38
Hobbseenor products11:38
mptWe'll get there eventually11:39
mptTesting, testing, testing11:39
Hobbsee(products being from my workplace)11:39
Hobbseesabdfl: right....11:39
Hobbseesabdfl: i would have thought that the changelogs told you that, and that there are easier command line tools to give you nice outputs?11:39
ubotuNew bug: #152884 in soyuz "If you accept packages from the UNAPPROVED queue, it says they're accepted, and takes you back to the NEW queue." [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/15288411:40
Fujitsusabdfl: Shouldn't it then state that synced sources are from sid? Or is that reliant on gina importing Debian and copying sources over?11:40
FujitsuDoes anybody here know of the rationale behind hiding UNAPPROVED from all but ubuntu-release?11:42
Fujitsu(there is a nasty workaround, but...)11:43
HobbseeFujitsu: what's the workaround?11:44
FujitsuHobbsee: http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-archive/queue/gutsy/unapproved, or so.11:44
FujitsuYes, that's it.11:44
=== Fujitsu waits for it to be quickly blocked.
ubotuNew bug: #152886 in soyuz "The queue page does not show you what the current override for each package is" [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/15288611:45
HobbseeFujitsu: oh, that's long known11:45
HobbseeFujitsu: updates every 5 mins or so - i ended up needing it for tribe 3.11:46
FujitsuAh.11:46
Hobbseempt: okay, added to my buglist.11:46
HobbseeFujitsu: was hard to do RM with pitti, when i couldnt see the unapproved queue :)11:46
FujitsuThis is true.11:46
Hobbseeat least now i can see it, even if i really shouldnt accept it.11:47
iwjWould anyone like to comment on the fact that bug 141597 is still happening despite a statement from an LP developer that the janitor was turned off ?11:48
ubotuLaunchpad bug 141597 in malone "bug janitor expires bug reports that should remain open." [High,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/141597 - Assigned to Curtis Hovey (sinzui-is)11:48
Fujitsuiwj: I noticed it closed a few, and mentioned it in here a couple of hours later, but got no response..11:48
ubotuNew bug: #152890 in soyuz "No accept/decline button at the top of the queue" [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/15289011:55
=== RicardoPerez [n=RicardoP@84.122.254.204.dyn.user.ono.com] has joined #launchpad
FujitsuUmm, what has happened with mplayer in feisty? The same version seems to now (as of 5 days ago) be published in -security and -updates, and I didn't see any bugs requested it be copied to -updates.12:06
Fujitsus/requested/requesting/12:06
elmoFujitsu: -security is being automatically copied to -updates, where it's trivial/obvious to do so, version-wise to help with bandwidth on security.ubuntu.com12:07
=== Hobbsee waves to elmo
elmo(well, pseudo-automatically)12:07
elmohi Hobbsee 12:07
Fujitsuelmo: Thought it might be something like that. Thanks.12:09
=== RicardoPerez [n=RicardoP@84.122.254.204.dyn.user.ono.com] has joined #launchpad
Davieyx93~/j #samba12:32
Davieyerk12:32
Hobbseehmmm, how much stuff does ppa ahve to build?12:36
FujitsuHobbsee: A lot of language packs, some more language packs, a few more language packs, and not much else.12:37
HobbseeFujitsu: i thought that was the main archive12:37
=== Hobbsee needs to see if this builds, fast.
FujitsuFor stable releases they're built in PPA.12:37
Hobbseeoh, i know.12:37
Fujitsuamd64 will build quickly.12:38
FujitsuBut i386 is DoSed.12:38
Hobbseeyay...12:38
sabdflFujitsu: debian asks us to change the package rather than just sync it12:40
sabdflthough i still hope they'll drop that as its a bizarre decision by them which they don't ask any other derivative12:40
Hobbseesabdfl: which is why we do the maintainer mangling?12:41
=== Hobbsee still fails to see hwo this integrates with launchpad.
Fujitsusabdfl: We only change sources if they're modified.12:42
Fujitsu.... oops, that didn't make much sense.12:42
FujitsuWe only make any modifications to the sources if we're introducing an Ubuntu-specific delta manually... the majority of source packages are bit-identical to Debian.12:43
=== BrianB04 [n=brian@c-69-136-128-216.hsd1.mi.comcast.net] has joined #launchpad
BrianB04Morning all.12:43
HobbseeFujitsu: i thought that was changed when all the build1'12:43
sabdflHobbsee: yes12:43
Hobbsees were done - to mangle the maintainer field12:43
HobbseeFujitsu: didnt you see pitti trashing the gutsy-changes?  :)12:43
FujitsuHobbsee: That was only for ubuntuX releases that hadn't had it mangled already.12:44
HobbseeFujitsu: ah, right.12:44
BrianB04Have a small problem with hosted Launchpad. I pushed a revision up last night (First one) and it's still showing "This branch is not published yet"12:44
FujitsuDirectly synced sources only have the resulting binaries mangled.12:45
Hobbseeright, yes.12:45
FujitsuWhich makes sense.12:45
Fujitsu(well, as much as mangling them at all makes sense)12:45
Hobbseeyeah, well12:45
BrianB04How long do hosted branches take to publish?12:45
FujitsuBrianB04: No more than a few minutes, I believe.12:45
BrianB04I wonder why mine isn't publishing then...12:46
Hobbseethen a maintainer in debian whines about how we've taken all the credit, as he's not the maintainer anymore, adn you didnt do the packaging, and ZOMG IT'S NOT FAIR!!!  UBUNTU SUCKS!!!!12:46
FujitsuI haven't seen any of that... yet.12:46
=== Hobbsee has
=== Hobbsee got a really shitty email about it.
FujitsuLovely.12:46
Hobbseeso i pointed to the place where the thing about "debian maintainers requesting this, and here were the votes" is, and that shut him up.12:47
FujitsuHahaha.12:47
Hobbsee(and got him into the pkgmangler)12:47
ddaaHobbsee: thank your for this12:47
=== Hobbsee never heard anything back afterwards...
Hobbseeddaa: for what?12:47
BrianB04Okay, so it is published in my home, which is ~brianbomamrito/phumbler/phumbler-dev...hrmmm12:48
ddaainforming angry debian developers of why Ubuntu packages do not name them as the maintainer12:48
FujitsuBrianB04: Which branch is it?12:48
Hobbseeddaa: ah yes :)12:48
FujitsuAh.12:48
ddaaBTW, I think Ubuntu debs DO mention them as "X-Original-Maintainer" or somesuch.12:48
Hobbseewe do.12:48
Hobbseebut that's not good enough for him - he wanted to be listed in maintainer only12:48
Fujitsuddaa: Yes, in both sources and binaries.12:48
BrianB04I see the .bzr in there...it has all the files that are needed.12:48
Hobbseeddaa: (fujitsu's a MOTU and i'm a core dev, fi that helps you context-wise)12:49
ddaaHobbsee: the heat that led to this situation was unpleasant enough, it's not nice being flamed again about things being the way Debian wanted them...12:49
Hobbseeddaa: yeah, well.12:49
iwjI think you guys must be just unlucky.  I've had no trouble at all from Debian maintainers.12:50
FujitsuBrianB04: Doesn't look like it pushed properly.12:50
BrianB04Any admins around to maybe see what's locked itup?12:50
ddaaiwj: maybe your reputation precedes you12:50
Hobbseeiwj: yeah, but you're a DD too.12:50
BrianB04Fujitsu: Didn't push properly?12:50
ddaapeople probably think thrice before flaming you12:50
FujitsuBrianB04: Have you tried pushing it again?12:50
Hobbseewhat surprises me is that i havent been flamed for uploading to debian with a @ubuntu.com address.12:51
Hobbseebut maybe uploading 1 package is not enough :p12:51
BrianB04Pushing it again.12:51
FujitsuMy uploads are @ubuntu.org.au, and I'm still alive :)12:51
ddaaHobbsee: that would be kinda silly12:51
BrianB04Tells me no new revisions to push.12:51
Fujitsuddaa: Use --overwrite12:51
FujitsuOops.12:51
Hobbseeddaa: tell me about it....12:51
FujitsuBrianB04: ^^12:51
ddaaHobbsee: it seems to me DD that complain, complain mostly about "ubuntu not giving back to Debian"12:52
Hobbseeyup12:52
ddaadrawing attention to @ubuntu.com uploads would kind of defeat the point12:52
Hobbseeactually, most of the time, my uploads seem to get mangled - as in, the team takes them, and says "changes by Sarah Hobbs" - but never actually mentions ubuntu in there.12:53
Hobbseeso they can get away with saying that we never contribute back12:53
BrianB04Fujitsu: Still saying no changes to push.12:53
FujitsuBrianB04: Have you actually committed anything to your local branch?12:53
BrianB04Yes.12:54
BrianB04Now it just took.12:55
FujitsuThat looks a bit better.12:55
FujitsuWhat did you do differently this time?12:56
=== radekp [n=Miranda@194.213.45.237] has left #launchpad []
BrianB04Well, aside from using the ssh+bzr vs the sftp nothing:)12:56
FujitsuAh.12:56
BrianB04So, perhaps that was the problem.12:57
FujitsuI suspect it only worked because bzr+ssh is more violent - it seems to upload an entire tarball of the directory and clobbers whatever was there.12:58
spivFujitsu: it never uploads tarballs.12:58
spivThe tarball hack is for the initial pull only.12:59
Fujitsuspiv: Oh, I thought that was what bzr+ssh did.12:59
FujitsuAh.12:59
FujitsuSorry.12:59
spivBrianB04: I'm pretty surprised that just changing sftp:// to bzr+ssh:// would make a difference to "no changes to push".12:59
BrianB04spiv: It still said no changes to push, but for some reason, it triggered the publishing.01:00
spivAh, I see.01:00
spivThat makes slightly more sense.01:00
BrianB04spiv: Not much more, but some;)01:01
spiv(Although if there was nothing to push, it shouldn't have done anything that would trigger publishing...)01:01
spivBrianB04: If you see any other weirdness, please let us know.01:01
BrianB04spiv: I will, absolutely. I really like Launchpad, far simpler in UI than say a sourceforge, and it works with Bazaar which is okay with me:)01:02
=== niemeyer [n=niemeyer@200-138-54-64.ctame705.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br] has joined #launchpad
=== salgado [n=salgado@canonical/launchpad/salgado] has joined #launchpad
BrianB04spiv: I would like to see an explanation how to setup something like Mozilla though in Bazaar. It's talked about, but never mentioned how to do it.01:05
=== salgado [n=salgado@canonical/launchpad/salgado] has joined #launchpad
=== PriceChild [n=pricechi@ubuntu/member/pdpc.supporter.student.PriceChild] has joined #launchpad
=== barry [n=barry@canonical/launchpad/barry] has joined #launchpad
BrianB04Like a grouping of software under a group name.01:10
=== cprov [n=cprov@canonical/launchpad/cprov] has joined #launchpad
=== niemeyer [n=niemeyer@200-138-54-64.ctame705.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br] has joined #launchpad
=== bac [n=bac@canonical/launchpad/bac] has joined #launchpad
=== jtv [n=jtv@canonical/launchpad/jtv] has joined #launchpad
=== mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch
=== kompressor [n=kompress@vc-196-207-45-243.3g.vodacom.co.za] has joined #launchpad
=== Spads [i=spacehob@unaffiliated/spads] has joined #launchpad
=== sabdfl [i=sabdfl@ubuntu/member/pdpc.silver.sabdfl] has joined #launchpad
=== RicardoPerez [n=RicardoP@84.122.254.204.dyn.user.ono.com] has joined #launchpad
=== RicardoPerez [n=RicardoP@84.122.254.204.dyn.user.ono.com] has joined #launchpad
=== bigon [n=bigon@ubuntu/member/bigon] has joined #launchpad
=== mrevell-lunch is now known as mrevell
=== Watersevenub [n=Watersev@azevedo.astro.up.pt] has joined #launchpad
=== dneary [n=dneary@mne69-9-88-163-116-163.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #launchpad
=== Hobbsee wonders how hard it woudl be, in the launchpad data model, to merge source packages in together - or at least mark them as "this does not exist anymore. please dont file bugs on this"
bigjoolslamont: hi - do you have some time to talk?02:56
=== Hattory [i=darkrad@ubuntu/member/hattory] has joined #launchpad
lamontbigjools: sure02:57
lamonta bit laggy as I work on some stuff here, but mostly present02:57
=== kompressor [n=kompress@gw.impilinux.co.za] has joined #launchpad
=== mwh [n=mwh@62-31-157-102.cable.ubr01.azte.blueyonder.co.uk] has joined #launchpad
ubotuNew bug: #152940 in launchpad "Home > Projects menu does not show my projects" [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/15294003:06
=== barry [n=barry@canonical/launchpad/barry] has joined #launchpad
=== SLaPoet [n=wpearson@66-194-42-54.static.twtelecom.net] has joined #launchpad
=== PriceChild [n=pricechi@ubuntu/member/pdpc.supporter.student.PriceChild] has joined #launchpad
=== matsubara [n=matsubar@canonical/launchpad/matsubara] has joined #launchpad
evarlastPPA is awesome! Now I know what to do with the packages I make for myself, that I think others might like!03:55
=== mthaddon [n=mthaddon@canonical/launchpad/mthaddon] has joined #launchpad
=== SLaPoet [n=wpearson@66-194-42-54.static.twtelecom.net] has joined #launchpad
=== flacoste [n=francis@modemcable178.77-70-69.static.videotron.ca] has joined #launchpad
=== statik [n=emurphy@189.66.188.72.cfl.res.rr.com] has joined #launchpad
=== ferthur [n=Student@24-213-56-202.static.mrqt.mi.charter.com] has joined #launchpad
ferthur/brb04:19
=== fernando110 [i=fernando@gateway/tor/x-72dba4d5fa79ad8a] has joined #launchpad
=== lakin [n=lakin@S01060013101832ce.cg.shawcable.net] has joined #launchpad
=== carlos [n=carlos@canonical/launchpad/carlos] has joined #launchpad
=== Rinchen [n=joey@canonical/launchpad/pdpc.supporter.professional.rinchen] has joined #launchpad
=== WebMaven [n=webmaven@nv-65-173-67-149.dhcp.embarqhsd.net] has joined #launchpad
=== danilo_ [n=danilo@adsl-236-193.eunet.yu] has joined #launchpad
=== lakin_ [n=lakin@S01060013101832ce.cg.shawcable.net] has joined #launchpad
=== Keybuk [n=scott@wing-commander.netsplit.com] has joined #launchpad
Keybukhi, I be having a blueprint bug05:38
Keybukthe +temp-meeting-export XML does not include the meetings05:38
=== leonel [n=leonel@189.155.89.113] has joined #launchpad
=== bigon [n=bigon@ubuntu/member/bigon] has joined #launchpad
=== effie_jayx [n=valles@ubuntu/member/effie-jayx] has joined #launchpad
gnomefreakto change owners of a team do we need the CC or can it be done another way? the owner deactivated himself and he hasnt been seen or contacted anyone in months05:45
Hobbseegnomefreak: which team?05:46
gnomefreakmozillateam05:46
gnomefreakdavid left for good it seems05:46
Hobbseeyou can probably get a LP admin to hijack it for you - perhaps SteveA 05:46
=== flacoste [n=francis@canonical/launchpad/flacoste] has joined #launchpad
gnomefreakty ill wait for him since you already pinged him  :)05:48
gnomefreakHobbsee: is mathew east the Mailing List contact as well?05:53
Hobbseefor lp users?05:53
gnomefreakno or ubuntu ML05:53
gnomefreakfor05:53
Hobbseewhich ubuntu ML?05:53
gnomefreaki thought there was one person (matt east) to talk to when setting up a ML05:54
Hobbseeoh, then you want to email rt@canonical.com05:54
Hobbseeabout getting one allocated05:54
Hobbseeif you want help about how to use it, poke one of the admins of one of th eubuntu lists05:55
elmonot rt@canonical05:55
gnomefreaki need to change owners for ML as well05:55
elmoeither rt@ubuntu.com ro mailman@lists.ubuntu.com05:55
Hobbseeelmo: oh yes, @ubuntu..  brain is dying, i think05:56
=== Hobbsee clearly hasnt had to email rt in a while.
Hobbseeelmo: rt@canonical exists, i take it?05:56
Hobbseethat'll be the quick way to get stuff done?05:56
elmoHobbsee: err05:56
elmoHobbsee: no.  there's a company private RT for IS (sysadmins) at rt@admin.canonical.com.  and there's the public RT at rt@ubuntu.com (and http://rt.ubuntu.com) but neither gets special treatment and/or is faster/slower than the other05:57
Hobbseeelmo: ah right.  coulda fooled me.05:57
elmoHobbsee: uhm, what are you basing that on?05:59
elmoHobbsee: the public RT has existed for less than a month, and AFAIK you've never filed a ticket in it?05:59
Hobbseeelmo: just how long it took for my request to get approved ages ago05:59
Hobbseeelmo: oh dear, then i'm confused.06:00
gnomefreakso email rt@ubuntu.com about changing owners of ML?06:00
elmognomefreak: yes06:00
gnomefreakelmo: ty06:00
=== matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch
Hobbseeelmo: would be right in thin;king that rt@ubuntu.com was private, or at least, unpublished, prior to this?06:02
Hobbseeor am i just on crack?06:02
elmoHobbsee: rt@ubuntu.com didn't exist until about a month ago, up until then, everything was redirected into rt@admin.c.c, including mailman@lists.u.c and mirrors@u.c06:04
gnomefreakit doesnt seem i have to i guess just being admin i can make all changes06:04
elmoHobbsee: as off about a month ago, we setup a new public RT, including rt@ubuntu.com and redirecting mailman@l.u.c and mirrors@u.c there too06:04
Hobbseeelmo: fair enough.06:04
Hobbseeelmo: out of curiousity, how long is the time for a request to be done - say a mailing list creation?06:05
elmoHobbsee: (mostly due to the influx of loco and other community orientated services we started to host ourselves)06:05
Hobbseeyep06:05
elmoHobbsee: right now, it's a two step process, it gets bounced to jono, he approves/denies, and we have a commitment to process approved lists within 2 working days06:05
Hobbseeelmo: nice!06:05
Hobbsee(tjat06:06
elmoHobbsee: the jono step is still variable because it relies on one person, but I believe that's one of the reasons he set up the loco council06:06
Hobbsee(that's a *lot* better than the few months that mine took!)06:06
Hobbseeyep06:06
=== ubuntulog [i=ubuntulo@trider-g7.fabbione.net] has joined #launchpad
=== Topic for #launchpad: https://launchpad.net | Next developer meeting: Thu 18 Oct 2007, 1400UTC | List: launchpad-users@lists.canonical.com | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | Help: https://help.launchpad.net | Channel logs: http://tinyurl.com/72w39
=== Topic (#launchpad): set by mrevell at Thu Oct 11 18:18:01 2007
=== lakin [n=lakin@S0106000d93cd4833.cg.shawcable.net] has joined #launchpad
=== sacater [n=sacater@ubuntu/member/colchester-lug.sacater] has joined #launchpad
=== salgado-brb is now known as salgado
=== Starting logfile irclogs/launchpad.log
=== ubuntulog [i=ubuntulo@ubuntu/bot/ubuntulog] has joined #launchpad
=== Topic for #launchpad: https://launchpad.net | Next developer meeting: Thu 18 Oct 2007, 1400UTC | List: launchpad-users@lists.canonical.com | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | Help: https://help.launchpad.net | Channel logs: http://tinyurl.com/72w39
=== Topic (#launchpad): set by mrevell at Thu Oct 11 18:18:01 2007
=== tonyyarusso [n=anthony@ubuntu/member/tonyyarusso] has joined #launchpad
yeagermdke: Swedish ubuntu-docs for feisty should be ok now09:20
=== kiko [n=kiko@canonical/launchpad/pdpc.supporter.active.kiko] has joined #launchpad
mdkeyeager: thanks09:28
=== tavla [n=spreker@ip51cfa1ef.direct-adsl.nl] has joined #launchpad
=== lakin [n=lakin@S01060013101832ce.cg.shawcable.net] has joined #launchpad
=== sabdfl [n=sabdfl@ubuntu/member/pdpc.silver.sabdfl] has joined #launchpad
=== leonel [n=leonel@189.155.155.217] has joined #launchpad
ubotuNew bug: #153049 in rosetta "Rosetta didn't import (some) updated GNOME translations from upstream" [Undecided,New]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/15304910:00
gnomefreakSteveA: you around for a question?10:10
=== imbrandon [n=brandon@ubuntu/member/pdpc.active.imbrandon] has joined #launchpad
=== jelmer_ [n=jelmer@157pc196.sshunet.nl] has joined #launchpad
=== Ubulette_ [n=Ubulette@APuteaux-153-1-56-139.w82-124.abo.wanadoo.fr] has joined #launchpad
=== ubotu [n=ubotu@ubuntu/bot/ubotu] has joined #launchpad
=== tck [n=tck@213-202-175-78.bas504.dsl.esat.net] has joined #launchpad
=== AlinuxOS [n=vsichi@host72-133-dynamic.16-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it] has joined #launchpad
=== Ubulette_ is now known as Ubulette
=== pochu [n=emilio@41.Red-83-32-162.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net] has joined #launchpad
=== mwh [n=mwh@62-31-157-102.cable.ubr01.azte.blueyonder.co.uk] has joined #launchpad
=== mwh [n=mwh@62-31-157-102.cable.ubr01.azte.blueyonder.co.uk] has joined #launchpad
=== gianmt [n=gianmt@151.77.177.167] has joined #launchpad
=== cprov [n=cprov@canonical/launchpad/cprov] has joined #launchpad
=== dda1 [n=ddaa@nor75-18-82-241-238-155.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #launchpad
=== RAOF_ [n=chris@123-243-65-41.tpgi.com.au] has joined #launchpad
=== pitoow [n=nao_@200-180-89-230.fnsce702.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br] has joined #launchpad
=== `23meg [n=m@ubuntu/member/-23meg] has joined #launchpad
=== LaserJock [n=mantha@ubuntu/member/laserjock] has joined #launchpad

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!