/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2007/10/17/#ubuntu-motu.txt

fernandois right /etc/ca-certificates.conf deactive all entries by default?15:57
=== tritium_ is now known as tritium
bddebianruffleS: Then you are on your own unfortunately, we can't help you. Sorry.19:03
norsettorufleS: well, any reason not to use the feisty package you have?19:03
ruffleSnorsetto, 'cuz it doesn't work on gutsy, the kernel module won't load19:04
Schnitz_Hobbsee: thanks for the hint19:04
ruffleSbddebian, thanks anyway19:04
ruffleSi'll try to figure out something19:04
bddebianruffleS: Did you ask around in #ubuntu?19:05
ruffleSnot yet19:05
norsettoruffleS: http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/48819:06
ruffleSnorsetto, yeah i've seen that already19:07
=== norsetto is now known as norsetto_limbo
=== Schnitz_ is now known as Schnitz
=== cprov is now known as cprov-out
=== norsetto_limbo is now known as norsetto
=== nuu is now known as nu
=== nu is now known as nuu
YokoZarSRUs are the "updates" repository right?20:29
KmosYokoZar: yes20:30
ScottKYokoZar: Yes.  How's Wine looking?20:31
YokoZarScottK: I found I'm missing a lib compiled in on 64 bit :(20:31
YokoZarSo the 64 bit package is built without libxml support20:32
YokoZarI'm testing a rebuild with hand-linking it on my machine now.20:32
sistpotyhi folks20:34
ScottKYokoZar: We can push stuff to gutsy-proposed now so it gets out in gutsy-updates as quickly as possible.20:34
ScottKhi sistpoty20:34
sistpotyhi ScottK20:35
norsettosistpoty: hi there20:42
sistpotykeescook: just stumbled over LP bug #64373. revu already contains code for this problem ;)20:42
ubotuLaunchpad bug 64373 in launchpad "[wishlist] download gpg keyring for a team" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/6437320:42
sistpotyhi norsetto20:43
norsettohow is it scottk?20:44
YokoZarScottK: can I move it up to Wine 0.9.47 then?20:46
YokoZarScottK: or should I keep it at 0.9.46 and save the later versions for backports?20:47
ScottKKeep it at 0.9.46 and keep 0.9.47 for backports (We'll upload it to Hardy as soon as the repos open and then backport it).20:48
geserYokoZar: I don't know if wine has a special rule but new versions don't get included in -updates20:48
ScottKhey norsetto.  Trying to squash bugs in something I'm upstream for.20:49
ScottKThe good news is I got a new user who's very "detail oriented".  The bad news is I got work to do.20:49
norsettoscottk: hehe20:49
keescooksistpoty: heh, cool.  :)20:53
sistpotykeescook: well, revu needs the keyring of ubuntu-universe-contributors to check if a source package should get accepted. I'm not sure how messy the code is though :P20:53
keescookyeah, I figure it just does a fetch from the keyserver.20:54
sistpotykeescook: iirc, yes... the revu-key script called with update is the entry point to follow what the current hacked up revu does ;)20:55
=== cprov-out is now known as cprov
ajmitchgood morning21:14
bddebianHeya ajmitch21:14
geserHi ajmitch21:14
sistpotyhi ajmitch, bddebian and geser21:15
pochuhi ajmitch, bddebian, geser ans sistpoty :)21:15
bddebianHeya sistpoty21:15
bddebianand pochu21:15
sistpotyhi pochu21:15
geserHi pochu21:15
* ajmitch should not start off an avalanche of greetings21:18
zulhey ajmitch21:24
sistpotyyay, light bulb burned, fuse went out :(21:28
jdongsistpoty: does that mean ntfs-3g stopped working?21:39
* jdong ducks21:39
bddebianheh21:40
sistpotyjdong: ntfs-3g? no... it meant rather that my gf's laptop was still on, while my box was off... the usual "damn, I did s.th. wrong when studying computer science" kind of feeling ;)21:40
jdongbddebian: I am the king of bad puns :)21:41
sistpotylucas: seems like mdt is broken, or am I using the wrong url (your people.debian.org adress)?21:52
Schnitzhow can i specify if a package is in multiverse or universe when i create it?22:03
Schnitzi've searched with google and the wiki and tried grep -ir universe/multiverse but couldn't find anything22:04
sistpotySchnitz: usually it get's set by the archive admins based on the details specified in debian/copyright. but I guess you can give hints by setting the section field of control to multiverse/$section.22:05
sistpoty(though I'm only guessing here as this field can definitely be overrided by an archive admin22:05
sistpoty+)22:05
Schnitzokay i've packaged something and uploaded it to my ppa and now it doesn't build there because it requires a package from multiverse22:06
Schnitzi thought i could specify that somewhere when creating the source package...thanks for your hint22:06
sistpotySchnitz: for ppa, I believe the control file I mentioned is responsible, though I'm not too sure there22:08
sistpotySchnitz: you could ask in #launchpad though, or try searching the launchpad-user mailing list, as I'm sure this was discussed before22:09
geserSchnitz: when you need build-depends from universe add "universe/" to your section22:09
geserthis should also work for multiverse but I don't know if ppa supports multiverse (see the ppa terms)22:10
lamegoI think it does not22:14
pochulamego: I think it does :)22:14
pochuFrom a discussion in #launchpad some days ago.22:15
geseris gutsy-proposed already available?22:15
lamegoI am based on the welcome to launchpad doc, but, I did a quick reading at that time22:16
lamegowelcome to PPA, I mean22:16
sistpotypochu: but it would be a license violation to upload anything to the multiverse section to ppa then? seems like easy sueable targets for me :P22:16
pochusistpoty: well, you can have a package which is GPL, but needs something from multiverse to build? Your package will still be GPL, just deppending on a library from multiverse?22:18
lamegoif it the resulting binaries installation requires multiverse packages, I guess that could be a legal issue22:19
sistpotypochu: I guess that's a corner case though... and actually I was kidding a little bit ;)22:20
pochulamego: why? you are still able to distribute it, aren't you?22:21
ScottKWe do have packages like that in the repository.  zekr for one if FOSS, but depends on stuff in multiverse, so is doomed to live there too.22:21
lamegopochu, if it drives an user to do something illegal, without warning him, I am doing something illegal, I guess22:22
lamegobut well, I am not a lawyer :)22:22
pochulamego: sorry, what's illegal there?22:22
pochulamego: neither am I ;)22:22
sorenhansin: If not, python-flup is probably the answer to your prayers.22:23
ScottKmultiverse stuff is legally distributable, just has other restrictions on it.22:23
lamegothere are multiverse packages, which do violate patents in some countries, correct ?22:23
sorenWhat the..22:23
pochulamego: well, I just said the use of multiverse/ is supported. Nothing else :)22:23
pochulamego: and not always. Those are special cases, afaik.22:23
lamegopochu, right, but distributing those binaries depending on universe packages, without a proper warning may not be supported, for legal reasons22:25
lamegoops, multiverse22:25
pochuDunno. But since you aren't shipping that package...22:26
lamegopochu, not always, but some, do, on some countries, at least they are tagged on the software sources as "Restricted by copyright or legal issues" ;)22:26
lamego"You agree to indemnify and hold Canonical Ltd, and its subsidiaries, affiliates, officers, agents, partners, and employees, harmless from any alleged claim or"22:28
lamegoI am not going to use PPAs :)22:28
pochuheh22:29
ScottKlamego: That's one thing we agree on.22:30
ScottKlamego: See Bug 13744722:30
ubotuLaunchpad bug 137447 in soyuz "PPA Terms of Service one sided" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/13744722:30
sistpotydamn, I didn't want to start a holy war :P ... but anyways I'm off to bed now, gn8 everyone22:32
lamegoI will go a bit further, I think Canonical should provide legal advice for those which may need to upload a software for which the legal status is unclear22:34
norsettonight all22:55
JazzvaI prepared two bugfixes in gnome-schedule. Both bugs are reported. Can I upload them as a single diff, or do I have to separte them?23:41
TheMusoJazzva: Are they for the same package?23:43
JazzvaTheMuso: Yep. It's just that they're two distinct bugs. I suppose I could add two lines in changelogs with both LP bug numbers. I'm just not sure if that's the right way...23:45
TheMusoJazzva: Yes, one diff with both bug fixes mentioned in the changelog is fine.23:50
JazzvaTheMuso: Thanks :)...23:50
TheMusonp23:51
JazzvaAnother question: One of them has been fixed upstream, but the new version is still not in the repositories. Can I provide the bugfix that will fix the version in the repositories?23:51
TheMusoYes I guess you could, but since its a gnome package, you may want to consult the desktop team about that.23:52
JazzvaTheMuso: Ok... thanks again :).23:52
TheMusonp23:52
knixWhen is eclipse goin gto be updated to 3.3?23:53
ajmitchknix: when hardy is being developed, it won't happen for gutsy23:54
ajmitchthere may be a slim chance of it getting into gutsy-backports23:54
knixYea I didn't expect it to happen in a day :P23:54

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!