[00:13] <Ubulette> it's quiet in here today. is that the gutsy's effect ? :)
[00:15] <asac> yeah
[00:15]  * gnomefreak working on a win pc thats not mine today
[00:15] <gnomefreak> panda antivirus installed a trojan, kind of ironic
[00:16]  * gnomefreak scared to remove it and ##windows channel fucking sucks
[00:17] <asac> gnomefreak: please don't get infected
[00:18] <gnomefreak> im not
[00:19] <asac> why again do you have to use windows for so long?
[00:25] <gnomefreak> asac: im on gutsy atm with win pc next to me fixing it for a friend
[00:25] <gnomefreak> asac: it brings in money ;)
[00:27] <asac> hehe
[00:27] <asac> what is broken?
[00:27] <gnomefreak> see above panada antivirus installed a trojan in its W32dir
[00:27] <gnomefreak> w32 dir.
[00:29] <asac> thats the "only" thing you are supposed to fix?
[00:29] <gnomefreak> asac: yes and its easy but im not sure if panda will work without that dll
[00:30] <gnomefreak> about to find out though
[00:30] <asac> well if it infects a dll then you don't want to use that scanner at all
[00:31] <asac> if its just detected as a trojan by some other tool but it actually isn't ... then its a false positive and not a problem
[00:32] <asac> given the fact that the release is out for a good time ... the network-manager bugcount has stayed stable at 190
[00:33] <Ubulette> gutsy's forum is full of it
[00:33] <Ubulette> well, not anymore as it's closed
[00:34] <asac> Ubulette: so the posts have been deleted?
[00:34] <Ubulette> hm, no, threads are still there but closed
[00:34] <asac> show me a few that came after the release please
[00:35] <Ubulette> hmm, i've updated my bookmarks and rss feeds to hardy
[00:36] <asac> so where do all these complains end up now?
[00:36] <gnomefreak> asac: thats what bothers me everything i read is confliting one says FP other says its real BUT panda has said to have fixed this already
[00:36] <Ubulette> asac, good question
[00:37] <asac> i somehow don't understand how forums are categorized
[00:37] <Ubulette> http://ubuntuforums.org/forumdisplay.php?f=238
[00:37] <gnomefreak> they will either be reopened or moved or new thread
[00:37] <gnomefreak> if you want i can find out
[00:37]  * gnomefreak knows forum mods
[00:38] <asac> Ubulette: i don't see any network-manager threads on top
[00:39] <Ubulette> "Wireless stopped working after today's update" ?
[00:39] <Ubulette> i'm not reading those
[00:39] <asac> Problem resolved. It turns out the wireless adapter hardware was somehow disabled. In WinXP, I can use Fn+F2 to disable my wireless card but I've never been able to do it in Ubuntu -- including now -- which is why it was the last thing I checked.
[00:39] <gnomefreak> is it not working or is it the servers being hit too hard (why does he feel it isnt working
[00:39] <asac> ok so a rfkill switch issue maybe
[00:40] <asac> maybe its that it now works and he didn't expect it to work :)
[00:41] <asac> and previously it was always on
[00:41] <asac> i would really like to be able to just close all bugs like they closed all threads in gutsy forum :)
[00:41] <gnomefreak> if you need one opened click REPORT above first post of thread
[00:42] <gnomefreak> and ask it to be moved and it will be moved and reopened. if needed fast if im here let me know and ill have it moved than
[00:42] <asac> gnomefreak: yeah
[00:42] <asac> i don't want to :)
[00:42] <gnomefreak> lol
[00:42] <asac> i even would like to follow their practice and close all bugs
[00:44] <gnomefreak> would be nice
[00:44] <gnomefreak> we close edgy soon :)
[00:44] <gnomefreak> april 08 maybe
[00:44] <gnomefreak> holy shit
[00:44] <gnomefreak> alot of n-m bugs
[00:45] <gnomefreak> you are maybe half of them
[00:51] <asac> me?
[00:51] <asac> you mean lots of nm bugmail, right?
[00:53] <gnomefreak> yes
[00:53] <gnomefreak> >24 hours
[00:54] <gnomefreak> asac: bug 153753 seems weird is this something that changed in firefox or flash?
[00:54] <gnomefreak> oh yeah bot died
[00:54] <gnomefreak> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153753
[00:56] <asac> gnomefreak: he definitly has flash 7 somewhere
[00:56] <asac> maybe in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/
[00:56] <asac> if not in /usr/lib/firefox/plugins nor ~/.mozilla/plugins/
[00:56] <gnomefreak> thats what i thought too but had to find out. care to tell him so i can go to bed?
[00:57] <gnomefreak> im gonn ashut it down to get gutsy(other partition) up and running as it has nothing installed since it was a basic feisty until today
[01:23] <lee986321> hello I need a confirmation
[01:24] <lee986321> in my latest up date to 64 bit system it is saying that fire fox is not accessable
[01:24] <lee986321> any one els running 64 bit that can verify?
[01:31] <lee986321> any one in here
[01:31] <lee986321> please respond
[01:32] <Ubulette> lee986321, it should work
[01:33] <lee986321>  has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source
[01:33] <Ubulette> which version ?
[01:33] <lee986321> Iam currently running Kubuntu 64 bit, I just recently esud the cd fro freshinstall adn half the stuff greyed out
[01:33] <Ubulette> firefox 2.0.0.x is supported
[01:34] <lee986321> then wahts going on? how come I can't down load it
[01:34] <lee986321> I used
[01:34] <lee986321> sudo apt-get install firefox
[01:35] <Ubulette> what does this show: apt-cache policy firefox
[01:35] <lee986321> getting the data
[01:37] <lee986321> Installed: (none)Candidate: (none)Candidate: (none) version table is blank
[01:37] <Ubulette> hmm
[01:37] <Ubulette> what does apt-get install said ?
[01:37] <lee986321> I don't want to get introuble for flooding
[01:37] <lee986321> but
[01:37] <Ubulette> paste into a pastebin
[01:37] <lee986321> E: Could not get lock /var/lib/dpkg/lock - open (11 Resource temporarily unavailable)
[01:38] <Ubulette> oh
[01:38] <lee986321> Package firefox is not available, but is referred to by another package.
[01:38] <lee986321> This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
[01:38] <lee986321> is only available from another source
[01:38] <Ubulette> most probably the lock
[01:38] <lee986321> E: Package firefox has no installation candidate
[01:38] <asac> lee986321: use synaptic ... ensure that there are actually valid update source confirmed ... update the software index ...and things should work
[01:38] <lee986321> waht is a "lock"?
[01:39] <asac> lee986321: sudo apt-get update; sudo apt-get install firefox :)
[01:39] <Ubulette> a file preventing you to use 2 apt-get/synaptic/whatever at the same time
[01:39] <asac> if that doesn't work try to use synaptics in system administration menu to fix your sources
[01:40] <Ubulette> asac, thx to show up.
[01:40] <lee986321> its doing a mess of osmething
[01:40] <asac> lee986321: your issues are really not firefox nor mozilla related, but somewhere further down the food chain ... try #ubuntu
[01:41] <lee986321> and stalled at 99 percent
[01:41] <Ubulette> (it's 2:40am here and I work early tomorrow)
[01:41] <asac> me too
[01:41] <lee986321> eh k I am on kubuntu
[01:41] <lee986321> but ty
[01:41] <asac> lee986321: ask there
[01:41] <asac> we are probably out now :)
[01:41] <asac> bye
[01:42] <lee986321> ty
[10:27] <asac> ok i am probably off for a while testing nm 0.7
[10:57] <Ubulette> hi
[10:57] <Ubulette> asac, http://diveintomark.org/archives/2007/10/18/gobuntu-has-already-failed
[10:57] <Ubulette> look at the bottom
[11:22] <asac> how is that news :)
[11:23] <Ubulette> it's not. just pasted for the last part
[11:23] <asac> yeah
[11:24] <Ubulette> mike commented on that too
[11:24] <asac> but how has gobuntu failed?
[11:24] <asac> where are the comments ... i don't see any on that page
[11:24] <Ubulette> just because it shipped the same ff a gutsy, so with non free branding
[11:25] <asac> ok ... but thats the fault of gobuntu then
[11:25] <asac> i have never been asked to fix anything in this regards
[11:25] <Ubulette> but gobuntu is a plain canonical distro, right ?
[11:25] <asac> e.g. we could punch iceweasel into universe and they can pick that for their distro
[11:26] <asac> i don't think so
[11:26] <asac> i think it all started with an independent project from fsf ... didn't it?
[11:26] <asac> e.g. they wanted to build a 100% free distribution based on ubuntu
[11:26] <asac> then mark said ... ok i want to support that
[11:26] <Ubulette> i thought it was an idea from Mark
[11:27] <Ubulette> http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/130
[11:27] <asac> yeah i think it existed before ... other name i guess
[11:28] <asac> ah i think it was gnewsense that inspired this project
[11:29] <Ubulette> ff 2008 is out officially. are you done with testing ?
[11:29] <asac> yes
[11:30] <asac> i am demotivated because we technically cannot roll this out before monday
[11:30] <asac> because of the gutsy dak sync
[11:31] <Ubulette> at least, push it too ppa so users concerned about that have a chance to grab it
[11:31] <asac> Ubulette: its in my ppa
[11:31] <asac> (except for gutsy)
[11:31] <asac> but i can do that
[11:31] <asac> the beta bits we tested are more or less the same
[11:31] <asac> they miss two patches ... which are not critical
[11:51] <asac> in fact only dapper misses those two patches ... edgy and feisty are the same as 2.0.0.8 final
[11:51] <asac> so if people in forum ask, point them to my ppa ... and maybe tell them to subscribe to the testcase on mozilla.qa.stgraber.org to get informed when new prereleases become available :)
[11:51] <asac> Ubulette: ^^ :)
[11:54] <Ubulette> yep, but I'm now only reading the forum for hardy
[11:54] <asac> hehe
[11:54] <Ubulette> i'm waiting for the new toolchain :)
[11:55] <asac> i need more forum embassador
[11:55] <asac> yeah
[11:55] <Ubulette> http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/10/instantbird-mozilla-based-instant-messaging/
[11:58] <asac> nice
[12:01] <asac> all mirrors are slow ... thats bad for me :/
[12:01] <Ubulette> for ?
[12:02] <asac> updating chroots et al
[12:02] <asac> do you have a full archive mirror?
[12:03] <Ubulette> not anymore (too big). try the french mirrors
[12:05] <Ubulette> try ftp://ftp.proxad.fr/ it's usually fast
[12:05] <asac> i ment full-mirror of main/universe of latest dev version :)
[12:06] <asac> ftp protocol has always high latency for me
[12:06] <asac> do they have http as well?
[12:11] <Ubulette> i dont know
[12:12] <Ubulette> try it with ftp, it should be faster anyway
[12:19] <asac_> oh reconnect
[12:27] <asac_> Ubulette: btw yesterday you said that there are only X debian related channels on freenode ...
[12:27] <asac_> in fact debian doesn't use freenode, but oftc officially
[12:27] <asac_> but you probably know
[12:30] <Ubulette> yes, but i've only listed freenode
[12:30] <asac> sure
[12:31] <asac> at least debian-devel has 100+ more nicks than we have :)
[12:31] <asac>  (in -devel)
[12:40] <asac> hmmm all peers on amd64 torrent are served already
[13:13] <asac> uploading ... uploading ... uploading :)
[13:14] <asac> interesting that my connection hasn't yet been dumped down
[13:14] <Ubulette> what speed ?
[13:21] <asac> 100k total
[13:21] <asac> sucks
[13:21] <Ubulette> lol
[13:21] <asac> but we already talked about it
[13:21] <asac> no fiber because of ignorant former monopol company that says: "copper is the future"
[13:22] <Ubulette> I can problably push a bit but 'im not sure it's useful
[13:27] <asac> hehe
[13:27] <asac> Ubulette: well these go directly to ubuntu archives.
[13:27] <asac> Ubulette: you should at some point apply for MOTU powers
[13:27] <asac> but not sure if you want that :)
[13:28] <Ubulette> what is the benefit ?
[13:28] <asac> you can upload to universe :)
[13:29] <Ubulette> i've just started the two torrents for gutsy desktop i386/amd64
[13:29] <Ubulette> 3min left
[13:29] <Ubulette> :)
[13:31] <asac> yeah
[13:31] <asac> lots of seeders
[13:31] <Ubulette> 1min left
[13:31] <asac> do you still see any leechers at all?
[13:32] <Ubulette> not much
[13:32] <asac> probably because one gets the bits with lightning speed
[13:37] <Ubulette> 200KB/s, not much
[13:37] <Ubulette> 600K
[13:37] <Ubulette> 800K
[13:38] <asac> i thought you already have finished :)
[13:38] <asac> or are you redownloading?
[13:38] <Ubulette> that's up
[13:38] <Ubulette> 1.1M
[13:39] <asac> really?
[13:39] <asac> so there are still leechers ;)
[13:39] <asac> ok i think i don't need to seed then :)
[13:42] <Ubulette> I'll keep mine a bit, i don't lind
[13:42] <Ubulette> mind
[13:45] <Ubulette> i up 5 times more for i836
[13:45] <asac> k
[13:48] <Ubulette> i've added the 2 alternates
[13:49] <asac> :)
[13:49] <Ubulette> it's even faster
[13:49] <Ubulette> 7M
[13:51] <asac> i wonder if mozilla silently dropped support for 1.8.0 branch tbird
[13:51] <asac> they don't mention 1.5.0.14 in the advisories
[13:51] <asac> though they should ... because they announced earlier that 1.5.0.14 _will_ be the last release
[13:51] <Ubulette> tb seems in a bad shape with lead devs gone
[13:51] <asac> lead devs gone?
[13:52] <asac> is mscott gone?
[13:52] <asac> well ... they officially demoted thunderbird on trunk to be _just_ a product until a new company/foundation takes it under their umbrella
[13:52] <asac> i think that happened though
[13:52] <Ubulette> yep
[13:52] <asac> s/just a product/just a project/
[13:53] <asac> so why do you think the lead devs are gone?
[13:53] <asac> david + scott are the ones that cares for that branch i guess
[13:53] <Ubulette> hold on. i'm looking as my rss archives
[13:54] <Ubulette> http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/10/scott-mcgregor-thunderbird-lead-engineer-leaves-mozilla/
[13:54] <Ubulette> http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/10/david-bienvenu-leaving-mozilla-thunderbird-in-trouble/
[13:55] <asac> the titles look scary enough :/
[13:59] <Ubulette> now I up at 1.4MB/s (11Mbps)
[13:59] <Ubulette> 1.7
[14:00] <Ubulette> 1.9
[14:00] <asac> yeah i just stopped to seed because of another upload :)
[14:00] <Ubulette> 2.1
[14:05] <Ubulette> my ration is still < 1 :p
[14:05] <Ubulette> ratio
[14:06] <asac> my ratio sucks
[14:06] <asac> :)
[14:06] <Ubulette> 3.5M/s
[14:06] <Ubulette> but it doesnt last long
[14:06] <Ubulette> i've upped 2.2G
[14:07] <Ubulette> 4.1M/s
[14:07] <Ubulette> 4.7
[14:07] <asac> you should up 100GB
[14:07] <Ubulette> 5.7
[14:07] <Ubulette> 6.3
[14:07] <Ubulette> 7.4
[14:07] <Ubulette> :)
[14:07] <Ubulette> 8.8
[14:07] <asac> how many leachers do you have`
[14:07] <Ubulette> 9.1
[14:07] <Ubulette> no idea
[14:09] <Ubulette> http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/gutsy.png
[14:12] <asac> nice
[14:13] <Ubulette> ratio 1.5
[14:15] <asac> Ubulette: do you know how to make pbuilder autosign packages?
[14:16] <asac> hmm ... nevermind
[14:20] <asac> ok ... i have 3 * xul 1.8.0 + 2 * xul 1.8.1 + 3 * iceape + 2 * icedove + 5 * thunderbird + 5 * firefox + 2 * sunbird + 1 * iceowl + 2 * xulrunner-1.9 + 2 * firefox-3.0
[14:20] <asac> on every security update
[14:20] <asac> ouch
[14:21] <asac> well 1.9 and 3.0 are not released in sync ... but somewhere in between i guess
[14:21] <asac> i think i have to automize all this
[14:21] <asac> its _really_ painful atm
[14:25] <Ubulette> why 2 xul1.9 ?
[14:26] <asac> gutsy + hardy
[14:26] <asac> this time i have luck :)
[14:27] <asac> well not much :)
[14:28] <Ubulette> you have to push twice right ? just with debian/changelog =~ 's/gutsy/hardy/' ?
[14:29] <asac> well ... this upload it will be more or less like that
[14:29] <asac> maybe i will stop to improve firefox in hardy ...then i could stick to this
[14:29] <asac> but i forked the branch alreadey
[14:29] <asac> in bzr
[14:33] <Ubulette> where?
[14:34] <asac> ubuntu-2.0.0.x.gutsy ... or something like taht
[14:36] <Ubulette> oh ok
[15:03] <asac> hi Jazzva
[15:04] <Jazzva> Hello asac...
[15:05] <Jazzva> I'll try to fix that bug in ubufox now. I wasn't really able to start working in the morning...
[15:09] <Jazzva> btw, when are hardy repos gonna be available?
[15:09] <asac> Jazzva: i think they are available right now
[15:09] <Jazzva> I thought of setting up old HDD for it :)...
[15:09] <asac> but nothing has changed so far
[15:09] <asac> try to flip your sources.list
[15:09] <asac> ah
[15:10] <asac> Jazzva: Ubulette already switched to hardy ;)
[15:10] <Jazzva> Well, I have to install some ubuntu on that other drive first... :)
[15:10] <Jazzva> Ubulette: Cool :D...
[15:11] <Jazzva> I wouldn't have courage to do it on this installation...
[15:15] <Ubulette> Get:7 http://archive.ubuntu.com hardy Release [65.9kB]
[15:15] <Ubulette> Get:8 http://archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages [1075kB]
[15:15] <Ubulette> Get:9 http://archive.ubuntu.com hardy/restricted Packages [7638B]
[15:15] <Ubulette> Get:10 http://archive.ubuntu.com hardy/multiverse Packages [158kB]
[15:15] <Ubulette> Get:11 http://archive.ubuntu.com hardy/universe Packages [4065kB]
[15:15] <Jazzva> :)
[15:15] <Ubulette> but it's damn slow
[15:15] <Ubulette> Fetched 6963kB in 2m1s (57.3kB/s)
[15:21] <asac> ha 50K :)
[15:30] <Jazzva> Hmm, funny... In firefox2 I can't install a video plugin using ubufox from repo.
[15:30] <Jazzva> I'll try it now in gp.
[15:31] <asac> Jazzva: you are talking abuot your ubufox?
[15:31] <asac> Jazzva: which videoplugin?
[15:31] <Jazzva> asac: No, about the version from the repos...
[15:31] <asac> what site?
[15:32] <Jazzva> people.ubuntu.com/.../2_multicontent.html
[15:32] <asac> what error do you get?
[15:32] <asac> for me synaptic fails atm with:
[15:32] <asac> http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/gutsy/Release: Unable to find expected entry  web/binary-amd64/Packages in Meta-index file (malformed Release file?)
[15:32] <asac> http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/gutsy-updates/Release: Unable to find expected entry  web/binary-amd64/Packages in Meta-index file (malformed Release file?)
[15:33] <asac> http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/gutsy-backports/Release: Unable to find expected entry  web/binary-amd64/Packages in Meta-index file (malformed Release file?)
[15:33] <asac> http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/gutsy-security/Release: Unable to find expected entry  web/binary-amd64/Packages in Meta-index file (malformed Release file?)
[15:33] <Jazzva> And it doesn't matter which plugin. When you select a plugin and click next it skips to the last page... There is some page in between, but it's there for less then a second
[15:33] <asac> strange
[15:33] <asac> Jazzva: that works for me
[15:33] <Jazzva> Ok, I'll check it again :/...
[15:33] <Jazzva> Is it the repository version?
[15:34] <asac> hmm after the error it installs totem anyway
[15:34] <asac> 0.4~beta1-0ubuntu4
[15:34] <asac> i think thats ahead?
[15:35] <Jazzva> hmm, I have -0ubuntu3...
[15:35] <asac> works with 3 as well
[15:37] <asac> Jazzva: maybe you have still your version installed in the profile
[15:37] <asac> you have to uninstall in addons dialog
[15:37] <Jazzva> Did that...
[15:37] <asac> only then you will see the system installed one
[15:37] <asac> ok
[15:37] <asac> error console?
[15:37] <asac> any output?
[15:38] <Jazzva> None...
[15:38] <Jazzva> But it behaves weird.
[15:38] <Jazzva> It lets me to skip to the next page, even if no plugin is selected
[15:39] <asac> no plugin is selected?
[15:39] <asac> that doesn't happen at all here
[15:39] <asac> the stable ubufox selects the first automatically iirc
[15:39] <asac> maybe you have your own ubuntu3 build installed?
[15:39] <Jazzva> Yes, that's what it should do
[15:39] <asac> apt-get remove ubufox ... then apt-get clean ... then install again
[15:40] <Jazzva> Ok
[15:45] <asac> does the mozillateam want to do https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BuildingCommunity/TeamReporting
[15:45] <asac> ??
[15:50] <Jazzva> The report at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TeamReports/September2007 does look nice... Clean and simple. (my opinion, even though I'm not part of mozillateam)
[15:51] <asac> Jazzva: you are not?
[15:51] <asac> Jazzva: you should i guess
[15:51] <Jazzva> asac: I meant you mean official members... nvm :).
[15:52] <Jazzva> asac: The version from the repo works nice... it was still mine installed
[15:52] <asac> ok :)
[15:52] <asac> good ;)
[15:52] <Jazzva> I'll do a diff between mine and the repo version and try to find the bug :).
[15:53] <asac> well ... maybe really try to get the branch updated ;)
[15:53] <asac> the real i mean
[15:53] <asac> we should also integrate the finish translation that i couldn't include for release
[15:53] <Jazzva> Huh?
[15:53] <asac> derived from main branch :)
[15:53] <asac> or did you already do that?
[15:53] <Jazzva> ~asac/ubufox/main? that one?
[15:53] <asac> yes
[15:54] <asac> thats the _upstream_ branch ... which we use for development
[15:54] <Jazzva> I did... I branched from that and merged with my current (ff3)...
[15:54] <asac> the ubuntu ones just get the packaging and cherry-picked patches in debian/patches
[15:54] <asac> Jazzva: well ... what happened to the debian dir?
[15:54] <asac> the main branch must not have one
[15:54] <Jazzva> Well, there isn't one..
[15:55] <asac> ok
[15:55] <asac> did you remove it explicitly?
[15:55] <asac> during merge?
[15:55] <Jazzva> Nope...
[15:55] <asac> how did you merge then?
[15:55] <Jazzva> bzr merge http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~jazzva/ubufox/ff3
[15:55] <Jazzva> It went without an error...
[15:56] <asac> ok so ff3 was already based on main
[15:56] <Jazzva> Yep...
[15:56] <asac> but your ubuntu branch was based on ubuntu
[15:56] <asac> i don't understand
[15:56] <Jazzva> Was it? *unsure*
[15:56] <asac> it is
[15:57] <Jazzva> Because I branched ff3 from my ubuntu branch
[15:57] <asac> oh no
[15:57] <asac> then i was just confused
[15:57] <asac> ok
[15:57] <Jazzva> Ok :)...
[15:57] <asac> maybe rename it to main
[15:57] <Jazzva> I guess :)...
[15:57] <Jazzva> It'll be less confusing...
[15:57] <asac> e.g. use that one
[15:57] <asac> Jazzva: maybe fix the ubuntu/main branch first then
[15:58] <asac> if that works merge the changes you did to ff3 as well
[15:58] <Jazzva> Ok...
[15:58] <asac> i think the ubuntu/main branch is broken in itself
[15:58] <Jazzva> I'll take a look. Brb, lunch.
[16:14] <asac_> hmm
[16:14] <asac_> this is chatzilla with xulrunner-1.9
[16:15] <asac_> i think we want to package that :)
[16:19] <Ubulette> what is "this" ?
[16:20] <Ubulette> i've already mentioned chatzilla /w xul weeks ago
[16:24] <asac> hehe
[16:24] <asac> yeah might be .. you mentioned alot ;)
[16:24] <asac> i think we should setup a list of xulapps for hardy
[16:25] <Jazzva> asac, fixed :)
[16:26] <Jazzva> At least it selects first radio button by default, and I tested with mplayer and it calles apturl for that package...
[16:26] <asac> hehe
[16:26] <asac> fine
[16:26] <asac> so that is on top of current main, right?
[16:27] <Jazzva> no, i still haven't pushed it...
[16:27] <asac> no ... i mean locally
[16:27] <Jazzva> tep
[16:27] <asac> if you fixed "main"
[16:27] <Jazzva> yep
[16:27] <asac> ok
[16:27] <asac> then pull in the admin feature for ubuntu as well
[16:27] <asac> aeh for main :)
[16:27] <Jazzva> I think it's already there :)... just to test it
[16:29] <Jazzva> It's working...
[16:30] <Jazzva> So, should I push this to main (that is /ubufox/ubuntu) and ff3, and then ask someone to rename ubuntu to main branch? (Or, can I rename it myself *unsure*?)
[16:39] <asac> Jazzva: you can rename on your own
[16:40] <asac> in launchpad
[16:40] <Jazzva> Ok... I'll go find it now...
[17:08] <Ubulette> asac, i'm still at 5M/s
[17:56] <Ubulette> i stop there: http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/gutsy2.png
[17:57] <Ubulette> that's equivalent to 81 CDs
[18:02] <Jazzva> asac, both branches are updated... i'll rename ff3 to main.ff3
[18:02] <Jazzva> ubuntu is renamed to main
[20:19] <Ubulette> archive is damn slow
[23:21] <asac> Jazzva: good
[23:32] <Jazzva> Ok :)...