[19:04] <camrdale> hi, what's the policy for security fixes to edgy universe? are they necessary/recommended?
[19:06] <bluekuja> camrdale, you should check SRUs documentation
[19:06] <bluekuja> in the wiki
[19:10] <camrdale> bluekuja: it doesn't say their not allowed, so I'm guessing it's a good idea?
[19:10] <bluekuja> yep
[19:10] <bluekuja> you need to prepare one
[19:10] <bluekuja> and submit it to the queue
[19:10] <bluekuja> u-u-s
[19:10] <bluekuja> or u-m-s
[19:11] <bluekuja> depends from package component
[19:11] <camrdale> should it be uploaded to REVU or is that only for the current release?
[19:11] <bluekuja> why do you need to provide a SRU?
[19:11] <bluekuja> which package?
[19:12] <bluekuja> which fix
[19:12] <bluekuja> ?
[19:12] <camrdale> the torrentflux package in edgy has security vulnerabilities
[19:12] <bluekuja> ok, then if you have fixes, open a bug
[19:12] <bluekuja> and push a debdiff
[19:12] <bluekuja> and asks for sponsorship
[19:12] <bluekuja> torrent-flux is in main?
[19:12] <camrdale> no, universe
[19:13] <bluekuja> ok
[19:13] <bluekuja> you have fixes ready?
[19:13] <camrdale> yes
[19:13] <bluekuja> make a debdiff
[19:13] <bluekuja> and open a SRU request
[19:13] <bluekuja> and push the bug there
[19:14] <camrdale> ok, thanks
[19:14] <bluekuja> camrdale, ping me with bug number
[19:14] <bluekuja> ;)
[19:14] <camrdale> sure, np
[20:12] <camrdale> bluekuja: LP 155491
[20:12] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 155491 in torrentflux "Multiple security vulnerabilities in Edgy" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/155491
[20:12]  * bluekuja checking
[20:14] <bluekuja> camrdale, woah
[20:14] <bluekuja> so many patches
[20:14] <camrdale> yeah
[20:14] <camrdale> is that a problem?
[20:14] <camrdale> they're all straight from debian
[20:14] <bluekuja> well, it will be harder to check them all
[20:14] <bluekuja> but not a problem
[20:14] <bluekuja> oh ok
[20:14] <bluekuja> if they come from debian is ok
[20:15] <camrdale> good, I'm working on the new package now
[20:15] <bluekuja> sounds great
[20:35] <bluekuja> camrdale, I'm looking at https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/153752
[20:35] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 153752 in ubuntu "[needs-packaging] apt-torrent" [Wishlist,Confirmed]
[20:35] <camrdale> yes
[20:37] <bluekuja> I've just answered
[20:37] <bluekuja> to get some feedback
[20:37] <bluekuja> on having it working for ubuntu
[20:38] <camrdale> thanks
[20:38] <bluekuja> it would be a nice tool
[20:38] <camrdale> it's a nice idea, but I'm more partial to DebTorrent (for obvious reasons ;)
[20:41] <bluekuja> camrdale, is it already packaged?
[20:41] <camrdale> debtorrent is, apt-torrent isn't (as far as I know)
[20:42] <bluekuja> yes
[20:42] <bluekuja> right
[20:43] <camrdale> actually, I guess there are debs for apt-torrent, but it's not in the archive
[20:43] <bluekuja> true
[20:43] <bluekuja> going for a bath
[20:43] <bluekuja> bbl
[20:43] <camrdale> see ya
[21:18] <bluekuja> back
[21:18] <bluekuja> heya fsateler
[21:18] <fsateler> hi
[21:18] <bluekuja> news?
[21:19] <fsateler> not much
[21:19] <fsateler> I've been pretty busy so I haven't been able to work on libtorrent
[21:20] <fsateler> however I spoke with rakshasa's libtorrent maintainer, and we concluded that the Conflicts is not avoidable
[21:22] <bluekuja> fsateler, what do you mean?
[21:22] <fsateler> I mean there is no way we can avoid libtorrent-rasterbar-dev conflicting with libtorrent-dev
[21:24] <bluekuja> oh
[21:24] <bluekuja> then we wont have that package
[21:24] <bluekuja> inside the archive
[21:24] <fsateler> why? there are lots of packages that conflict with each other
[21:25] <bluekuja> like?
[21:26] <fsateler> it would have to be priority extra instead of optional, though
[21:28] <bluekuja> fsateler, anyway it's not really nice to have conflicting packages
[21:28] <fsateler> bluekuja: no, but it's the only option
[21:29] <bluekuja> fsateler, true
[21:29] <bluekuja> fsateler, but the archive admins will accept that?
[21:29] <bluekuja> as it is?
[21:29] <fsateler> I believe they will
[21:29] <fsateler> as long as the rest of the package is acceptable
[21:29] <bluekuja> camrdale, any thought?
[21:32] <bluekuja> fsateler, anyway you should change destination dirs
[21:32] <bluekuja> as well
[21:32] <fsateler> which destination dirs?
[21:32] <bluekuja> if we cannot have a good soname et all
[21:33] <bluekuja> install dir should point to libtorrent-rasterbar
[21:33] <bluekuja> and not libtorrent
[21:33] <bluekuja> you should hack makefiles
[21:33] <fsateler> I changed libtorrent to use -release instead of -version-info
[21:34] <fsateler> so the soname is libtorrent-0.12 rather than libtorrent.so.0
[21:34] <bluekuja> fsateler, I mean directories
[21:34] <bluekuja> not sonames
[21:34] <fsateler> for the header files?
[21:34] <bluekuja> e.g /usr/share/libtorrent-rasterbar
[21:34] <bluekuja> and so on
[21:34] <fsateler> well, the library *must* be in /usr/lib
[21:35] <bluekuja> fsateler, of course
[21:35] <fsateler> so you mean the header files?
[21:35] <bluekuja> fsateler, is it a shared or static lib?
[21:35] <bluekuja> fsateler, yes
[21:35] <fsateler> shared
[21:35] <bluekuja> fine
[22:00] <fsateler> bluekuja: I'm not sure if it is a good idea to move from libtorrent to libtorrent-rasterbar
[22:00] <fsateler> it may break 3rd party programs that #include <libtorrent/file.h>
[22:01] <bluekuja> fsateler, what's the binary name of original libtorrent?
[22:01] <bluekuja> and the one for rasterbar?
[22:02] <fsateler> bluekuja: not sure what you mean
[22:02] <bluekuja> fsateler, binary field in control file
[22:03] <fsateler> rakshasa's is libtorrent10
[22:03] <fsateler> rasterbar's is libtorrent-rasterbar-0.12
[22:03] <bluekuja> fsateler, binary name is the final .deb name
[22:03] <fsateler> bluekuja: oh, ok
[22:03] <bluekuja> just wanted to know them
[22:03] <bluekuja> for both libtorrens
[22:03] <fsateler> libtorrent-rasterbar-0.12_0.12-1_i386.deb
[22:04] <fsateler> libtorrent10_0.11.8-1_i386.deb for rakshasa's
[22:06] <bluekuja> ok
[22:06] <bluekuja> I'm going now
[22:06] <bluekuja> I need some sleep
[22:06] <bluekuja> :)
[22:06] <bluekuja> see you tomorrow
[22:06] <bluekuja> so we can keep talking
[22:07] <fsateler> bluekuja: see ya
[22:07] <bluekuja> good night
[23:54] <camrdale> I updated LP 155491 with the debdiff for the fixed version of the package
[23:54] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 155491 in torrentflux "Multiple security vulnerabilities in Edgy" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/155491