=== Jazzva_ is now known as Jazzva | ||
Jazzva | asac: bug 154593, someone says it's an ubufox bug. As far as I can see it's an apt problem... and I don't think it's a bug, but a request for feature :). | 01:00 |
---|---|---|
ubotu | Launchpad bug 154593 in ubuntu "apt:// protocol, bug with multiple programs" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/154593 | 01:00 |
asac | Jazzva: let me look | 01:24 |
asac | he should post a testpage | 01:25 |
asac | that is too unspecific to say if its a bug at all | 01:25 |
Jazzva | asac: I think he already did... just a sec, phone... | 01:25 |
Ubulette | asac, why ff 2008 isn't in yet ? | 01:31 |
Ubulette | ohoh, i've pushed 200G of gutsy :) starting to slow down. i think it's enough | 01:35 |
Jazzva | asac: back, sorry... I think that he said that if you enter something like "apt://package1, package2, package3" it would say that "package1, package2, package3" doesn't exist. Was multiple package installation supported before? | 01:41 |
gnomefreak | repos opened :) | 01:41 |
Ubulette | gnomefreak, for ? | 01:41 |
gnomefreak | hardy | 01:42 |
Ubulette | i know | 01:42 |
gnomefreak | im upgrading my testing partition | 01:42 |
Ubulette | i'm running it | 01:42 |
gnomefreak | i havent logged into ubuntu in 3 days or so | 01:42 |
gnomefreak | since release day | 01:42 |
Ubulette | $ lsb_release -rcd | 01:42 |
Ubulette | Description: Ubuntu hardy (development branch) | 01:42 |
Ubulette | Release: 8.04 | 01:42 |
Ubulette | Codename: hardy | 01:42 |
gnomefreak | once i figure out my irssi i will be working on iceape 1.1.5 | 01:43 |
gnomefreak | Ubulette: can you add iceape tarballs to mozclient please | 01:43 |
gnomefreak | if you havent already | 01:43 |
Ubulette | iceape is seamonkey right ? | 01:43 |
gnomefreak | me and asac were talking about that the other day | 01:43 |
gnomefreak | yes | 01:43 |
Ubulette | i will | 01:43 |
gnomefreak | if you can for 1.1.x and 2.0.x? or something | 01:44 |
Ubulette | i'm playing with actionmonkey now | 01:44 |
gnomefreak | actionmokeny? | 01:44 |
gnomefreak | only spelled right | 01:44 |
Ubulette | javascript engine of mozilla 2 | 01:45 |
Ubulette | = spidermonkey + tamarin | 01:45 |
gnomefreak | ah | 01:45 |
Ubulette | that's for firefox 4 :) | 01:46 |
gnomefreak | thats way too far ahaead | 01:46 |
gnomefreak | damn your talking a 8-12 months | 01:46 |
Ubulette | more than that | 01:46 |
Ubulette | 18 months, maybe | 01:46 |
gnomefreak | so you see my point ;) | 01:47 |
Ubulette | strange it's so big | 01:48 |
Ubulette | -rw-r--r-- 1 fta fta 48439183 Oct 21 02:44 actionmonkey_1.9~a9~hg20071015r7020.tar.gz | 01:48 |
Jazzva | asac: Now I see that the person that reported the bug sent me an e-mail about it... I'll forward it to you. | 01:48 |
Ubulette | asac, http://benjamin.smedbergs.us/blog/2007-10-16/sharing-mercurial-queues-to-develop-xpcomgc/ | 01:51 |
Ubulette | benjamin is reinventing quilt + bzr :) | 01:51 |
Ubulette | he'll end up doing a deb :) | 01:51 |
gnomefreak | eh if i find time tomorrow ill play with 1.1.5 for now i say good night | 01:58 |
asac | Ubulette: well that feature sounds good | 02:10 |
asac | e.g. mq | 02:10 |
Ubulette | he's just storing patches (even with a "series" file) in a vcs | 02:11 |
Ubulette | it's no different from us | 02:11 |
Ubulette | just bigger patches maybe | 02:12 |
asac | so mq is a mozilla owned extension for hg? | 02:12 |
asac | certainly bigger and more patches :) | 02:12 |
Ubulette | In mid-2005, Chris Mason took the features of quilt and wrote an extension that he called Mercurial Queues, which added quilt-like behaviour to Mercurial. | 02:14 |
Ubulette | The key difference between quilt and MQ is that quilt knows nothing about revision control systems, while MQ is integrated into Mercurial. Each patch that you push is represented as a Mercurial changeset. Pop a patch, and the changeset goes away. | 02:14 |
Ubulette | Because quilt does not care about revision control tools, it is still a tremendously useful piece of software to know about for situations where you cannot use Mercurial and MQ. | 02:14 |
Ubulette | hmm, not very clear what the gain is | 02:15 |
Ubulette | we pop and it's gone too | 02:15 |
asac | for me the gain sounds like its just as handy as quilt, but from revision point of view its tightly integrated | 02:15 |
asac | hard to say ;) | 02:17 |
asac | maybe i will have a better wording of what i mean the other day | 02:17 |
Ubulette | http://hgbook.red-bean.com/hgbookch12.html | 02:17 |
asac | anyone has anyidea on what ubuntu should invent on the mozilla-front in hardy? | 02:18 |
asac | ok i am out | 02:32 |
Ubulette | 'night | 02:33 |
gnomefreak | well i started 1.1.5 but will look into it if it fails tomrrow or some time this week | 05:29 |
=== bluekuja_ is now known as bluekuja | ||
seanhodges | hey everyone, I'm having a bit of trouble using gtkmozembed since I upgraded to Gutsy, can anyone give me some pointers? | 15:13 |
seanhodges | This is for C++ btw, I think some of the paths have moved around, as for one thing I now need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to compile now | 15:14 |
masterx12 | Who is responsible for the extensions, which are accessible via "Get Ubuntu Addons" within Firefox in Gutsy? | 15:33 |
masterx12 | if somebody knows/sees anyone who is responsible for it, please tell him, that he should take a look at following bugs: #155378 and #136619 | 16:02 |
masterx12 | i leave | 16:02 |
Ubulette | hi | 17:36 |
Ubulette | hardy now ships with gcc 4.2.2 by default | 17:37 |
asac | yes | 19:30 |
asac | bug 155378 and bug 136619 | 19:48 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 155378 in tabextensions "mozilla-tabextensions is unrecommended" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/155378 | 19:48 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 136619 in mozilla-firefox-adblock "adblock is outdated" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/136619 | 19:48 |
asac | seanhodges: how do you build ? | 19:59 |
Ubulette | (i use tab mix plus and adblock plus) | 20:05 |
Ubulette | not the old ones | 20:05 |
Ubulette | works fine with ff3 | 20:05 |
seanhodges | asac: are you still here? | 20:18 |
seanhodges | sorry i was at pub ;) | 20:18 |
seanhodges | i'm using gcc: "gcc -g -o test `pkg-config --cflags --libs gtk+-2.0,firefox-gtkmozembed` test.cpp" | 20:23 |
seanhodges | test.cpp is just a small program i knocked together to test the problem i'm having, it just starts gtkmozembed in a GTK window - using the same method that worked for me in Feisty | 20:24 |
seanhodges | to expand on what i typed before (i was a bit inaccurate), it seems to compile fine, but when i run it i get a segfault | 20:25 |
Ubulette | seanhodges, try that: | 20:27 |
Ubulette | export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/usr/lib/firefox | 20:27 |
Ubulette | export MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME=/usr/lib/firefox | 20:27 |
Ubulette | ./test | 20:27 |
seanhodges | will do, cheers | 20:27 |
Ubulette | or post your test.cpp somewhere so we can give it a try | 20:27 |
seanhodges | oh my god it worked! | 20:30 |
seanhodges | lol cheers Ubulette, it looks like i was missing MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME | 20:30 |
Ubulette | :) | 20:30 |
seanhodges | i cant tell u how pleased i am, thanks loads! | 20:31 |
Ubulette | glad it helped | 20:32 |
Ubulette | bluekuja, bug 155491 is pretty nasty. 8 1+ year old security bugs :( | 20:49 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 155491 in torrentflux "Multiple security vulnerabilities in Edgy" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/155491 | 20:49 |
bluekuja | heya Ubulette | 21:18 |
bluekuja | was having a bath | 21:19 |
bluekuja | Ubulette, yeah. I'm in contact with the debian maintainer who filled up that request | 21:19 |
=== asac_ is now known as asac | ||
=== Ubulette_ is now known as Ubulette | ||
atlfalcons866 | is firefox going to be updated to 2.0.8 | 22:40 |
Ubulette | yes | 22:41 |
atlfalcons866 | ok | 22:41 |
asac | ThunderStruck: still on win? | 23:13 |
ThunderStruck | asac, atn yes eating dinner upstairs. seems 1.1.5 doesnt like 99_configure.dpatch so ill fix that tonight i hope, im assuming since it failed only on that patch that it is the state that my branch is at. so im gonna try mt branch than if fails fix it right ;) | 23:14 |
asac | 99_configure.dpatch will always fail | 23:17 |
asac | you always have to update it | 23:17 |
ThunderStruck | ah damn | 23:17 |
asac | e.g. just ignore conflicts ... run autoconf2.13 | 23:17 |
asac | apply | 23:17 |
ThunderStruck | ok thats easy enough | 23:17 |
asac | done | 23:17 |
ThunderStruck | this is done outside or dpatch-edit-* right | 23:18 |
ThunderStruck | but in the source area (build-area or just top level | 23:18 |
ThunderStruck | ) | 23:18 |
ThunderStruck | i have it downstairs on paper but just making sure now | 23:19 |
asac | dpatch-edit 99_... | 23:20 |
asac | then autoconf2.13 | 23:20 |
asac | rm confgure.rej | 23:20 |
asac | exit | 23:20 |
asac | done | 23:20 |
ThunderStruck | ah ok than run config... than ctrld | 23:20 |
asac | right | 23:20 |
ThunderStruck | rm configure.rej before or after fixing it | 23:20 |
ThunderStruck | it should be there now so i assume remove first (that way unless autoconf fails it should not be there | 23:21 |
asac | ThunderStruck: doesn't matter when | 23:21 |
ThunderStruck | ok | 23:22 |
asac | just _before_ you exit | 23:22 |
asac | otherwise you will produce clutter in 99_confi* | 23:22 |
ThunderStruck | oh remove it while in dpatch | 23:22 |
asac | yes | 23:22 |
ThunderStruck | thats easy enough :) | 23:22 |
asac | otherwise it will be added to 99_configure.dpatch (as a new file) | 23:22 |
asac | which you probably don't want | 23:22 |
ThunderStruck | asac, than i should have it built and ready for gutsy :) | 23:23 |
ThunderStruck | no i rather not have another useless file anywhere with this app | 23:23 |
asac | yeah | 23:23 |
asac | ready for hardy you mean? | 23:23 |
ThunderStruck | this should fit in SRU for gutsy | 23:24 |
asac | ah | 23:24 |
ThunderStruck | asac, im gonna build on gutsy first | 23:24 |
asac | well if you have it you can give it to me ... we can probably send it through security | 23:24 |
ThunderStruck | let them work on tool chain a bit more | 23:24 |
asac | not sure how security for universe works though | 23:24 |
asac | or if all security uploads for universe are SRUs? | 23:24 |
ThunderStruck | asac, i will have it hopfully tomorrow mid morning | 23:24 |
asac | ThunderStruck: thats good enough | 23:25 |
ThunderStruck | asac, not sure but i thought they were, can find out tomorrow | 23:25 |
asac | ThunderStruck: i think they should go through the security team | 23:25 |
asac | but first prepare the package | 23:25 |
asac | then lets see | 23:25 |
ThunderStruck | not motu? | 23:25 |
asac | i will figure out tomorrow | 23:25 |
ThunderStruck | or you even since you have upload rights to all | 23:26 |
ThunderStruck | ok | 23:26 |
asac | i cannot say ... i have to ask kees tomorrow. | 23:26 |
ThunderStruck | ill start fixing it tonight and build bin. overnight than build source for upload | 23:26 |
asac | yes | 23:26 |
* ThunderStruck is asssuming none of the patches should give me issues since 99_conf... failed and it as last ran | 23:27 | |
asac | configure is normal to fail .. if the rest works ... all looks good | 23:30 |
asac | spin it ... test it and if you don't see any regressions upload it to your ppa so i can pull it from there and push it to security or main archive | 23:30 |
ThunderStruck | ok i just had a thought too :( the above statment might be wrong but we will see | 23:32 |
ThunderStruck | i expect that if 99_configure changes that means they changed the source files that we might have patched so patches might fail | 23:32 |
ThunderStruck | but let me see what im gonna do with leftover dinner and ill start it when i get downstairs | 23:33 |
ThunderStruck | and maybe if all goes well i can get back to that frigging pos 4 line python program to find out why its buggy | 23:34 |
ThunderStruck | bbs | 23:38 |
Ubulette | asac, what's blocking ff 2008 ? | 23:39 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!